Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🇺🇸🇨🇳 America wants reactors on cargo ships again. MARAD signed a deal with Core Power to open a path for U.S.-flagged nuclear merchant ships, so construction could start in 2028. That date is a target, but the lure is obvious: Today’s boxships haul thousands of tons of bunker fuel...

MarioNawfal's profile picture

Mario Nawfal

3,889,792 subscribers

50,651 views • 4 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & TechnologyNews & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🇷🇺🇺🇸🇪🇺🇰🇵 NATO SUNK A RUSSIAN SHIP WITH A TORPEDO!? An investigation into the sinking of the cargo ship Ursa Major in 2024 in the Mediterranean Sea shows the ship was attacked! The Russian ship was carrying important cargo to North Korea, but it was sunk last year. According to the investigation, the ship was carrying two 45-tonne nuclear reactor covers for a nuclear icebreaker of the 10510 project being built. The ship departed from St. Petersburg and was heading to Vladivostok via the Mediterranean Sea. The official cargo included two 45-tonne nuclear reactor covers for a nuclear icebreaker and two German 380-tonne mobile port cranes Liebherr 420, which were to be installed in the port of Vladivostok. On December 22, explosions occurred on the ship, and on the 23rd, it sank. An inspection of the damage showed a hole in the hull with a deformation of the metal inward, which indicates a hit from the outside, not an internal explosion. The investigation suggests that armor-piercing torpedoes were used. -> Who is able to sink ships with torpedoes off the coast of Spain? The answer is simple. The crew was rescued by Spain and the captain of the ship was interrogated there. 1/
1:19

🇷🇺🇺🇸🇪🇺🇰🇵 NATO SUNK A RUSSIAN SHIP WITH A TORPEDO!? An investigation into the sinking of the cargo ship Ursa Major in 2024 in the Mediterranean Sea shows the ship was attacked! The Russian ship was carrying important cargo to North Korea, but it was sunk last year. According to the investigation, the ship was carrying two 45-tonne nuclear reactor covers for a nuclear icebreaker of the 10510 project being built. The ship departed from St. Petersburg and was heading to Vladivostok via the Mediterranean Sea. The official cargo included two 45-tonne nuclear reactor covers for a nuclear icebreaker and two German 380-tonne mobile port cranes Liebherr 420, which were to be installed in the port of Vladivostok. On December 22, explosions occurred on the ship, and on the 23rd, it sank. An inspection of the damage showed a hole in the hull with a deformation of the metal inward, which indicates a hit from the outside, not an internal explosion. The investigation suggests that armor-piercing torpedoes were used. -> Who is able to sink ships with torpedoes off the coast of Spain? The answer is simple. The crew was rescued by Spain and the captain of the ship was interrogated there. 1/

Lord Bebo

33,131 views • 8 months ago

🚨 JUST IN — SEN. JOHN KENNEDY: "The Ayatollah is Muslim, but his strain of Islam says that if you do not agree with his interpretation, you deserve TO DIE." "The Ayatollah wants to KILL ME." "We're not trying to start a war in Iran. The president is trying to end the war in Iran." "I'm talking about the Ayatollah and his followers. In America, we separate government from religion. Not Iran. The government IS the religion." "He acts on this belief." "If the Ayatollah gets a nuclear weapon, he will use it. He could use it against America. He could use it against Israel. I don't know who he'll use it against, and I hope I'm wrong, but he will use it." "And you know what else will happen? As soon as he gets a nuclear weapon, Saudi Arabia is going to get a nuclear weapon, and the UAE is going to get a nuclear weapon, and Japan is going to get a nuclear weapon, and South Korea, and I could go on, and on, and on." "He exports terrorism. He was the person behind Hamas and Hezbollah that has killed, that have killed so many people throughout the world, not just in the Middle East, but across the world, including, but not limited to, Americans. That's why we ought to care."
8:25

🚨 JUST IN — SEN. JOHN KENNEDY: "The Ayatollah is Muslim, but his strain of Islam says that if you do not agree with his interpretation, you deserve TO DIE." "The Ayatollah wants to KILL ME." "We're not trying to start a war in Iran. The president is trying to end the war in Iran." "I'm talking about the Ayatollah and his followers. In America, we separate government from religion. Not Iran. The government IS the religion." "He acts on this belief." "If the Ayatollah gets a nuclear weapon, he will use it. He could use it against America. He could use it against Israel. I don't know who he'll use it against, and I hope I'm wrong, but he will use it." "And you know what else will happen? As soon as he gets a nuclear weapon, Saudi Arabia is going to get a nuclear weapon, and the UAE is going to get a nuclear weapon, and Japan is going to get a nuclear weapon, and South Korea, and I could go on, and on, and on." "He exports terrorism. He was the person behind Hamas and Hezbollah that has killed, that have killed so many people throughout the world, not just in the Middle East, but across the world, including, but not limited to, Americans. That's why we ought to care."

Eric Daugherty

967,760 views • 6 months ago

It is now the seventh day – something that has never happened before – of an emergency situation at the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant. Because of Russian shelling, the plant has been cut off from power, disconnected from the electrical grid, and is being supplied with electricity by diesel generators. This is extraordinary. The generators and the plant were not designed for this, have never operated in this mode for long, and we already have information that one generator has failed. It is Russian shelling that prevents repair of the power lines to the plant and the restoration of basic safety. This is a threat to everyone – no terrorist in the world has ever dared to do to a nuclear plant what Russia is doing. And it is right that the world does not stay silent.
5:47

It is now the seventh day – something that has never happened before – of an emergency situation at the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant. Because of Russian shelling, the plant has been cut off from power, disconnected from the electrical grid, and is being supplied with electricity by diesel generators. This is extraordinary. The generators and the plant were not designed for this, have never operated in this mode for long, and we already have information that one generator has failed. It is Russian shelling that prevents repair of the power lines to the plant and the restoration of basic safety. This is a threat to everyone – no terrorist in the world has ever dared to do to a nuclear plant what Russia is doing. And it is right that the world does not stay silent.

Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський

971,665 views • 11 months ago

🚨COMING SOON: NUCLEAR-POWERED CARGO SHIPS 🚨 U.S. Department of Transportation is working to fast-track construction of a new fleet of vessels to change the game and DOMINATE China THAT MEANS: 📦 MORE CARGO (no internal fuel tanks) 🚢 FASTER SHIPS (up to 75% faster crossings) 🌐 ZERO EMISSIONS (20 years of continuous power without refueling) The first NUCLEAR-POWERED vessel is set to be built in 2028 🇺🇸
0:28

🚨COMING SOON: NUCLEAR-POWERED CARGO SHIPS 🚨 U.S. Department of Transportation is working to fast-track construction of a new fleet of vessels to change the game and DOMINATE China THAT MEANS: 📦 MORE CARGO (no internal fuel tanks) 🚢 FASTER SHIPS (up to 75% faster crossings) 🌐 ZERO EMISSIONS (20 years of continuous power without refueling) The first NUCLEAR-POWERED vessel is set to be built in 2028 🇺🇸

Secretary Sean Duffy

1,473,250 views • 13 days ago

JUST IN 🇺🇸🇮🇷: U.S. Vice President on Iran Having Nukes They just do not want Muslim Countries to have nuclear weapons. Saudi Arabia buys billions in Weapons from America, and the U.S. still does not trust them. Vance: "And it's not just them, because if the Iranians get a nuclear weapon, you know who gets a nuclear weapon like the next day? The Saudi Arabians. And then somebody else in the Gulf Arab state. And so you have nuclear proliferation on a global scale. The biggest threat to security in the world is a lot of people having nuclear weapons. So what the president has said is Iran's not going to get a nuclear weapon."
0:33

JUST IN 🇺🇸🇮🇷: U.S. Vice President on Iran Having Nukes They just do not want Muslim Countries to have nuclear weapons. Saudi Arabia buys billions in Weapons from America, and the U.S. still does not trust them. Vance: "And it's not just them, because if the Iranians get a nuclear weapon, you know who gets a nuclear weapon like the next day? The Saudi Arabians. And then somebody else in the Gulf Arab state. And so you have nuclear proliferation on a global scale. The biggest threat to security in the world is a lot of people having nuclear weapons. So what the president has said is Iran's not going to get a nuclear weapon."

Ryan Rozbiani

73,195 views • 7 months ago

Senator Chris Murhpy on Iran's nuclear program: The president has also said over and over again that a goal of the war is to permanently deny Iran the ability to have nuclear weapons. But in our closed-door briefings, we learned that this is not actually a goal of the war plan. It is not a goal of the war to destroy Iran’s nuclear program — which is not surprising, because you cannot destroy Iran’s nuclear program from the air. You cannot destroy knowledge. You cannot hunt down with missiles every Iranian scientist who knows how to build a nuclear reactor. And much of the material is buried so far underground that it is immune to an air campaign. But then why is the president and the Department of Defense telling the American people that the point of the war is to destroy Iran’s nuclear program?
0:44

Senator Chris Murhpy on Iran's nuclear program: The president has also said over and over again that a goal of the war is to permanently deny Iran the ability to have nuclear weapons. But in our closed-door briefings, we learned that this is not actually a goal of the war plan. It is not a goal of the war to destroy Iran’s nuclear program — which is not surprising, because you cannot destroy Iran’s nuclear program from the air. You cannot destroy knowledge. You cannot hunt down with missiles every Iranian scientist who knows how to build a nuclear reactor. And much of the material is buried so far underground that it is immune to an air campaign. But then why is the president and the Department of Defense telling the American people that the point of the war is to destroy Iran’s nuclear program?

Clash Report

31,792 views • 6 months ago

Salute to DOE-Idaho Operations Office, the unsung heroes of the Reactor Pilot Program. Behind every reactor that reached criticality in this program is a small team at the DOE Idaho Operations Office that quietly cleared the path- not just for us, but for everyone. They rewrote orders and standards to demonstrate how nuclear regulations, that had slowed nuclear down for decades, can be made efficient. They proved something the industry needed to see: the federal government can be an accelerant for new nuclear, not a brake. That team is led by Bob Boston - the man, the myth, the legend, and a true American hero. I also want to express immense gratitude to Idaho National Laboratory for the leadership and unconditional support that carried us across the finish line. It's why INL has earned its name as the Silicon Valley of nuclear. To Office of Nuclear Energy | US Department of Energy and Idaho National Lab together: you proved you can move fast and be safe at the same time. This milestone is as much yours as it is ours, and we share it with you proudly
2:29

Salute to DOE-Idaho Operations Office, the unsung heroes of the Reactor Pilot Program. Behind every reactor that reached criticality in this program is a small team at the DOE Idaho Operations Office that quietly cleared the path- not just for us, but for everyone. They rewrote orders and standards to demonstrate how nuclear regulations, that had slowed nuclear down for decades, can be made efficient. They proved something the industry needed to see: the federal government can be an accelerant for new nuclear, not a brake. That team is led by Bob Boston - the man, the myth, the legend, and a true American hero. I also want to express immense gratitude to Idaho National Laboratory for the leadership and unconditional support that carried us across the finish line. It's why INL has earned its name as the Silicon Valley of nuclear. To Office of Nuclear Energy | US Department of Energy and Idaho National Lab together: you proved you can move fast and be safe at the same time. This milestone is as much yours as it is ours, and we share it with you proudly

Yasir Arafat

10,484 views • 2 months ago

Trump’s media company merging with a nuclear fusion company is a much bigger deal than you think. CEO Devin Nunes calls the project “Manhattan Project 2.0.” “There’s nothing more important than making this work.” Nunes just broke down why this is such a big deal: “We just released plans that we’re merging with TAE.” “The first commercial reactor will be about 50 megawatt, but the second reactor … would be somewhere in that 350 to 500 megawatt range.” “The big nuclear fusion reactors are around a thousand.” “Most of the coal or gas plants are in that two to five hundred range.” “So, TAE working with us, building these reactors—obviously this has never been done before, so there’s a lot to be done.” “You can have all the AI, all the technology you want, but if you don’t have the power, it doesn’t matter.” “The only competition, in my mind, for our future company is China.” “The Chinese have put untold billions into this, and they know that it’s now going to be possible to have a nuclear fusion reactor that works.” “We’re really racing against the clock against China.”
3:36

Trump’s media company merging with a nuclear fusion company is a much bigger deal than you think. CEO Devin Nunes calls the project “Manhattan Project 2.0.” “There’s nothing more important than making this work.” Nunes just broke down why this is such a big deal: “We just released plans that we’re merging with TAE.” “The first commercial reactor will be about 50 megawatt, but the second reactor … would be somewhere in that 350 to 500 megawatt range.” “The big nuclear fusion reactors are around a thousand.” “Most of the coal or gas plants are in that two to five hundred range.” “So, TAE working with us, building these reactors—obviously this has never been done before, so there’s a lot to be done.” “You can have all the AI, all the technology you want, but if you don’t have the power, it doesn’t matter.” “The only competition, in my mind, for our future company is China.” “The Chinese have put untold billions into this, and they know that it’s now going to be possible to have a nuclear fusion reactor that works.” “We’re really racing against the clock against China.”

Jan Jekielek

24,615 views • 7 months ago

🚨Thorium Reactors: China Just Did What Everyone Else Talked About for 50 Years China has just crossed a line the rest of the world never managed to step over. Their experimental thorium molten salt reactor has successfully converted thorium into uranium-233 and sustained nuclear fission inside a working system. This matters more than most people realize. Thorium has always been the nuclear fuel that sounded great in theory and died in practice. It is more abundant than uranium. It produces less long lived waste. It is also harder to weaponize. The physics have been understood since the Cold War, but the problem was always execution, materials, corrosion and chemistry. Control. China solved enough of those problems to make the fuel cycle work. The reactor in question is small, producing only two megawatts so it's not powering cities or feeding the grid, but that is not the point. This was a proof of capability, not a commercial rollout. They demonstrated something no other country has publicly demonstrated. Breeding uranium-233 from thorium inside a molten salt reactor and using it to sustain fission. That single step unlocks the entire thorium fuel cycle. They did it with a reactor that operates at atmospheric pressure, uses liquid fuel, and can be designed to shut itself down passively if things go wrong. No danger of high pressure steam explosions, no fuel rods to melt and no water cooling dependency. China has large domestic thorium reserves. Uranium supply chains are global, fragile, and politically exposed. Thorium changes that equation. It also changes waste profiles and long term fuel availability. In theory, it allows centuries of base load power from material that was previously treated as a curiosity. The United States, Europe, and others studied molten salt reactors decades ago and walked away. Not because they were impossible, but because conventional uranium reactors were already entrenched, regulated, and profitable. Thorium was disruptive before disruption was fashionable. China stayed with it and built materials science programs around it. They accepted slow progress. They ran experiments without promising headlines, and now they are the only country that can point to an operating thorium molten salt reactor that actually does what the textbooks said it should. This does not mean commercial thorium power is around the corner. Scaling this is hard and so is licensing it. Operating molten salt systems for decades is hard. But the breakthrough is real. If the technology that could redefine nuclear safety, fuel independence, and long term energy stability just matured outside the West, what else are we assuming is impossible simply because we stopped trying? #Thorium #NuclearEnergy #China #EnergySecurity #MoltenSaltReactor #CleanEnergy #AdvancedNuclear Video clip source:
1:11

🚨Thorium Reactors: China Just Did What Everyone Else Talked About for 50 Years China has just crossed a line the rest of the world never managed to step over. Their experimental thorium molten salt reactor has successfully converted thorium into uranium-233 and sustained nuclear fission inside a working system. This matters more than most people realize. Thorium has always been the nuclear fuel that sounded great in theory and died in practice. It is more abundant than uranium. It produces less long lived waste. It is also harder to weaponize. The physics have been understood since the Cold War, but the problem was always execution, materials, corrosion and chemistry. Control. China solved enough of those problems to make the fuel cycle work. The reactor in question is small, producing only two megawatts so it's not powering cities or feeding the grid, but that is not the point. This was a proof of capability, not a commercial rollout. They demonstrated something no other country has publicly demonstrated. Breeding uranium-233 from thorium inside a molten salt reactor and using it to sustain fission. That single step unlocks the entire thorium fuel cycle. They did it with a reactor that operates at atmospheric pressure, uses liquid fuel, and can be designed to shut itself down passively if things go wrong. No danger of high pressure steam explosions, no fuel rods to melt and no water cooling dependency. China has large domestic thorium reserves. Uranium supply chains are global, fragile, and politically exposed. Thorium changes that equation. It also changes waste profiles and long term fuel availability. In theory, it allows centuries of base load power from material that was previously treated as a curiosity. The United States, Europe, and others studied molten salt reactors decades ago and walked away. Not because they were impossible, but because conventional uranium reactors were already entrenched, regulated, and profitable. Thorium was disruptive before disruption was fashionable. China stayed with it and built materials science programs around it. They accepted slow progress. They ran experiments without promising headlines, and now they are the only country that can point to an operating thorium molten salt reactor that actually does what the textbooks said it should. This does not mean commercial thorium power is around the corner. Scaling this is hard and so is licensing it. Operating molten salt systems for decades is hard. But the breakthrough is real. If the technology that could redefine nuclear safety, fuel independence, and long term energy stability just matured outside the West, what else are we assuming is impossible simply because we stopped trying? #Thorium #NuclearEnergy #China #EnergySecurity #MoltenSaltReactor #CleanEnergy #AdvancedNuclear Video clip source:

Skywatch Signal

148,292 views • 8 months ago

China warned Japan: if it pushes to revise the Three Non-Nuclear Principles and introduces allied nuclear weapons, it will undermine the post-war international order, violate its commitment to peace, and ultimately pay a heavy price. Japan’s obsession with nuclear weapons is almost poetic. The only country ever hit by nuclear bombs now wants to crawl under the nuclear umbrella of the country that bombed it — while pretending this is “security.” But no. Nuclear weapons will not make Japan safe. A defeated fascist state with an uncleared blood debt to Asia does not get to revive militarism, flirt with nuclear weapons, and pretend history is just a museum exhibit. China keeps reminding Japan of one fact: Japan is a defeated state of World War II. It is bound by the post-war order. It does not get to rewrite the rules because its neo-fascists wants to cosplay militaristic fantasies again. Fascist Japan’s debt to Asia was never paid. Not by anime. Not by cherry blossoms. Not by Western propaganda turning it into a cute, obedient Asian model student. Not by its practiced humility hiding a knife underneath. Not by kneeling at the feet of the same country that nuked it. Japan can decorate itself however it wants. China remembers what it is. And China will not allow history to repeat itself.
0:42

China warned Japan: if it pushes to revise the Three Non-Nuclear Principles and introduces allied nuclear weapons, it will undermine the post-war international order, violate its commitment to peace, and ultimately pay a heavy price. Japan’s obsession with nuclear weapons is almost poetic. The only country ever hit by nuclear bombs now wants to crawl under the nuclear umbrella of the country that bombed it — while pretending this is “security.” But no. Nuclear weapons will not make Japan safe. A defeated fascist state with an uncleared blood debt to Asia does not get to revive militarism, flirt with nuclear weapons, and pretend history is just a museum exhibit. China keeps reminding Japan of one fact: Japan is a defeated state of World War II. It is bound by the post-war order. It does not get to rewrite the rules because its neo-fascists wants to cosplay militaristic fantasies again. Fascist Japan’s debt to Asia was never paid. Not by anime. Not by cherry blossoms. Not by Western propaganda turning it into a cute, obedient Asian model student. Not by its practiced humility hiding a knife underneath. Not by kneeling at the feet of the same country that nuked it. Japan can decorate itself however it wants. China remembers what it is. And China will not allow history to repeat itself.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

36,604 views • 1 month ago

Did Trump bring the nuclear box onto Air Force One a few days ago and concealed it in the biscuit briefcase it could just be that those extra bags were for medical equipment perhaps Trump has a condition that he has not told the public about but we really don’t have any idea all we do know is that that specific briefcase is used to carry the nuclear laptop around so we will see what happens with this war but it seems like it’s heading towards a peaceful conclusion so we do not need a huge bomb to settle things.
1:07

Did Trump bring the nuclear box onto Air Force One a few days ago and concealed it in the biscuit briefcase it could just be that those extra bags were for medical equipment perhaps Trump has a condition that he has not told the public about but we really don’t have any idea all we do know is that that specific briefcase is used to carry the nuclear laptop around so we will see what happens with this war but it seems like it’s heading towards a peaceful conclusion so we do not need a huge bomb to settle things.

Charley Griffin

26,419 views • 18 days ago

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The U.S. is desperately trying to prevent Iran from rebuilding its nuclear programme while needing to get it back to the negotiating table to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. The problem is that one of Iran's most important remaining nuclear facilities is believed to be buried too deep for even America's most powerful conventional bunker-buster bombs to reliably destroy. That has led some analysts to discuss a possibility that until recently would have been almost unthinkable: a U.S. tactical nuclear strike. The greatest danger wouldn't necessarily be Iran's immediate retaliation. It would be breaking an almost 80-year taboo on the use of nuclear weapons. That precedent wouldn't stay in the Middle East. Russia has repeatedly threatened nuclear escalation during the war in Ukraine but has so far stopped short of crossing that line. Part of that restraint comes from the enormous political cost of being the first country since 1945 to use a nuclear weapon in war. If the U.S crosses that line first, it's easier for others to follow. It becomes far harder for Washington and its allies to argue that Russia must never do something they have already done themselves. A tactical nuclear strike might solve one military problem in Iran. But it could also make nuclear weapons politically usable again in every future war that involves a rival with nuclear capabilities. Writer: Mhedi
1:48

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The U.S. is desperately trying to prevent Iran from rebuilding its nuclear programme while needing to get it back to the negotiating table to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. The problem is that one of Iran's most important remaining nuclear facilities is believed to be buried too deep for even America's most powerful conventional bunker-buster bombs to reliably destroy. That has led some analysts to discuss a possibility that until recently would have been almost unthinkable: a U.S. tactical nuclear strike. The greatest danger wouldn't necessarily be Iran's immediate retaliation. It would be breaking an almost 80-year taboo on the use of nuclear weapons. That precedent wouldn't stay in the Middle East. Russia has repeatedly threatened nuclear escalation during the war in Ukraine but has so far stopped short of crossing that line. Part of that restraint comes from the enormous political cost of being the first country since 1945 to use a nuclear weapon in war. If the U.S crosses that line first, it's easier for others to follow. It becomes far harder for Washington and its allies to argue that Russia must never do something they have already done themselves. A tactical nuclear strike might solve one military problem in Iran. But it could also make nuclear weapons politically usable again in every future war that involves a rival with nuclear capabilities. Writer: Mhedi

Mario Nawfal

85,233 views • 1 month ago

🚨 NOW: Rep. Byron Donalds demands Democrats PUT UP or SHUT UP on claiming to want affordable energy, saying they should immediately support massive nuclear power plant legislation SPOT ON! "Nuclear power is American technology. We created it." 🇺🇸 "The United States of America needs to get back into the business of building nuclear power plants. The way we do that is reforming the regulatory side to lower those costs!" "So it becomes more efficient. It's not just a big plan that everybody thinks about. It's also allowing for small modular nuclear reactors and micro nuclear reactors to be deployed to help lower utility costs of the people of Florida, but also of all of America." "Small modular reactors are on all of our naval ships. For the most part is technology and energy sources that are just common sense and we can do that. And I think this might even be a conduit for Senate Democrats to join us to have a way to have cheap and readily available power for the people of our country and of Florida." Byron Donalds knows his stuff. He's gonna be a great governor.
1:16

🚨 NOW: Rep. Byron Donalds demands Democrats PUT UP or SHUT UP on claiming to want affordable energy, saying they should immediately support massive nuclear power plant legislation SPOT ON! "Nuclear power is American technology. We created it." 🇺🇸 "The United States of America needs to get back into the business of building nuclear power plants. The way we do that is reforming the regulatory side to lower those costs!" "So it becomes more efficient. It's not just a big plan that everybody thinks about. It's also allowing for small modular nuclear reactors and micro nuclear reactors to be deployed to help lower utility costs of the people of Florida, but also of all of America." "Small modular reactors are on all of our naval ships. For the most part is technology and energy sources that are just common sense and we can do that. And I think this might even be a conduit for Senate Democrats to join us to have a way to have cheap and readily available power for the people of our country and of Florida." Byron Donalds knows his stuff. He's gonna be a great governor.

Eric Daugherty

35,908 views • 11 days ago

“A ship doesn’t sink because of the water around. A ship will sink because of the water that get in. I’m not going to allow the water that is outside to get into my ship and sink it.” — Burna Boy says.
1:02

“A ship doesn’t sink because of the water around. A ship will sink because of the water that get in. I’m not going to allow the water that is outside to get into my ship and sink it.” — Burna Boy says.

𝐀𝐬𝐚𝐤𝐲𝐆𝐑𝐍

79,522 views • 8 months ago