Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

American doctor days she has multiple elderly patients that need to be admitted into nursing homes She says insurance companies are now giving no notice for peer-2-peer calls to approve them. The latest one gives her 3 hours, if she can’t drop everything “he doesn’t get to go” “So... sick of insurance companies. I have had two patients that have been sitting in the hospital for five days that I have said for five days that they, they need to go to the nursing home. Physical therapy, occupational therapy notes are in. They've noted the severe debility. They're recommending nursing home too. — Today I get a notice at 11am That a peer to peer is due in order for one to go to the nursing home and it had to be done by 2pm so you give me a notice at 11 and you give me three hours to work in and I had multiple critical patients at this point. And so you give me three hours to say you have to call by three hours. This patient doesn't get to go” She says she’s having to do the calls from home This is a scam. The insurance companies make it as inconvenient as possible to deny as many patients as they canshow more

Wall Street Apes

1,048,333 subscribers

89,439 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Health & Wellness News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Hospital WHISTLEBLOWER 🚨 New policy is making emergency room employees hand out papers to “old people” saying they will be billed $3,500 per day if their insurance doesn’t cover their visit She says this is to scare them from staying for the health insurance companies “I’m having a moral and ethical dilemma and I don't know who else to share it with. I work at a hospital in an emergency room and part of my job is to deal with insurance stuff and the hospital I work for now has added this paper that I have to give to old people and try to make them sign who are in the emergency room and sometimes people like can go to get physical therapy and stay at a nursing home from the emergency room and we just hold them there until it's time to go based on their insurance. But they want me to give these poor old people this piece of paper that says you may have to pay $3,500 a day for your stay if your insurance doesn't cover it. And it feels so dirty and I feel like a shitty human for having to give these things out and yeah, what do you do? What do you do? I'm feeling the malicious compliance but I don't know what else to do.”

Hospital WHISTLEBLOWER 🚨 New policy is making emergency room employees hand out papers to “old people” saying they will be billed $3,500 per day if their insurance doesn’t cover their visit She says this is to scare them from staying for the health insurance companies “I’m having a moral and ethical dilemma and I don't know who else to share it with. I work at a hospital in an emergency room and part of my job is to deal with insurance stuff and the hospital I work for now has added this paper that I have to give to old people and try to make them sign who are in the emergency room and sometimes people like can go to get physical therapy and stay at a nursing home from the emergency room and we just hold them there until it's time to go based on their insurance. But they want me to give these poor old people this piece of paper that says you may have to pay $3,500 a day for your stay if your insurance doesn't cover it. And it feels so dirty and I feel like a shitty human for having to give these things out and yeah, what do you do? What do you do? I'm feeling the malicious compliance but I don't know what else to do.”

Wall Street Apes

1,154,662 views • 1 year ago

INSANE 🚨 This surgeon has a patient who needs a “deep flap” surgery. Insurance denied it To appeal she had to speak to her patients insurance. “I actually asked, do you know what a deep flap is? THE DOCTOR SAID NO.” The insurance companies deciding if Americans get their procedures DONT EVEN KNOW what the procedures are. How is this okay?! THIS is the state of American healthcare… “You may remember I had a patient who needs a deep flap, and the insurance company denied an inpatient stay for her. So I had to schedule a peer to peer call and schedule time out of my day to ask for a conversation directly with someone who is my peer to discuss deep flap surgery and why that patient needed to be overnight. That call was scheduled for 11AM, and eleven came around 11: 30, 11: 45 and no call still. And then we emailed the insurance company because, of course, they don't give me the call number. They only let me receive the call. So finally at 12: 15, I received the call that was initially scheduled for 11. And the doctor who called me was not a surgeon. And I actually asked the doctor, do you know what a deep flap is? And the doctor said no. So that's where we are. My patient has insurance. She's seeing someone who's fellowship trained in microsurgery, me, to do her breast reconstruction, and I'm having to teach another doctor what a deep flap is in order to justify her overnight stay to navigate her insurance. This is completely ridiculous.”

INSANE 🚨 This surgeon has a patient who needs a “deep flap” surgery. Insurance denied it To appeal she had to speak to her patients insurance. “I actually asked, do you know what a deep flap is? THE DOCTOR SAID NO.” The insurance companies deciding if Americans get their procedures DONT EVEN KNOW what the procedures are. How is this okay?! THIS is the state of American healthcare… “You may remember I had a patient who needs a deep flap, and the insurance company denied an inpatient stay for her. So I had to schedule a peer to peer call and schedule time out of my day to ask for a conversation directly with someone who is my peer to discuss deep flap surgery and why that patient needed to be overnight. That call was scheduled for 11AM, and eleven came around 11: 30, 11: 45 and no call still. And then we emailed the insurance company because, of course, they don't give me the call number. They only let me receive the call. So finally at 12: 15, I received the call that was initially scheduled for 11. And the doctor who called me was not a surgeon. And I actually asked the doctor, do you know what a deep flap is? And the doctor said no. So that's where we are. My patient has insurance. She's seeing someone who's fellowship trained in microsurgery, me, to do her breast reconstruction, and I'm having to teach another doctor what a deep flap is in order to justify her overnight stay to navigate her insurance. This is completely ridiculous.”

Wall Street Apes

1,292,441 views • 1 year ago

American Surgeon talking about US Health Insurance Companies denying coverage for patients in extreme need “Today, this patient was actually denied surgery initially, and he has spinal cord compression. He has spinal nerve compression, he has severe weakness, and he has a collapsed neck. So these are the challenges that we have every day. So to get patients to the OR takes a lot of people.” He then talks about how many people it actually takes just to overcome insurance company denies and get their patients care, “We battle this all the time.” “A patient who has a clear indication for surgery denied by the insurance company, - First they denied the surgery altogether - Then they said that I couldn't use cages to support the spine - Then they said I could do a three level fusion without a plate - Then they said the patient had to go home on the same day of surgery, which I think is, is actually dangerous” This video is crazy, the insurance company actually wants to leave patients in extremely dangerous situations even after surgery

American Surgeon talking about US Health Insurance Companies denying coverage for patients in extreme need “Today, this patient was actually denied surgery initially, and he has spinal cord compression. He has spinal nerve compression, he has severe weakness, and he has a collapsed neck. So these are the challenges that we have every day. So to get patients to the OR takes a lot of people.” He then talks about how many people it actually takes just to overcome insurance company denies and get their patients care, “We battle this all the time.” “A patient who has a clear indication for surgery denied by the insurance company, - First they denied the surgery altogether - Then they said that I couldn't use cages to support the spine - Then they said I could do a three level fusion without a plate - Then they said the patient had to go home on the same day of surgery, which I think is, is actually dangerous” This video is crazy, the insurance company actually wants to leave patients in extremely dangerous situations even after surgery

Wall Street Apes

1,189,908 views • 1 year ago

This is a Neurosurgeon at UCLA He has a patient that has brain tumors 🚨 UnitedHealthcare has denied his patient a MRI for lifesaving imaging and THEY’RE DENYING DOING PEER TO PEERS A Peer to Peer is how doctors could appeal the insurance company decision “So UnitedHealthcare has once again disappointed me as an insurance company because they not only denied an MRI for one of my patients that needed advanced sequences for tumor surgery, but they denied a peer to peer. Now, I thought things were supposed to get better after all the complaints on social media, the heat that they've had from all the public opinion. But to take away the peer to peer process and have us fill out a form that they're going to fax to us at some unknown time and date, this patient literally needs the SARI so that we can do a safer brain tumor surgery, and yet now they're removing the avenues through which we can even apply for that. — UnitedHealth, if you are going to deny our ability to order scans or labs that are crucial for carrying out safe patient care, at least make the appeal process easier so that we can do so”

This is a Neurosurgeon at UCLA He has a patient that has brain tumors 🚨 UnitedHealthcare has denied his patient a MRI for lifesaving imaging and THEY’RE DENYING DOING PEER TO PEERS A Peer to Peer is how doctors could appeal the insurance company decision “So UnitedHealthcare has once again disappointed me as an insurance company because they not only denied an MRI for one of my patients that needed advanced sequences for tumor surgery, but they denied a peer to peer. Now, I thought things were supposed to get better after all the complaints on social media, the heat that they've had from all the public opinion. But to take away the peer to peer process and have us fill out a form that they're going to fax to us at some unknown time and date, this patient literally needs the SARI so that we can do a safer brain tumor surgery, and yet now they're removing the avenues through which we can even apply for that. — UnitedHealth, if you are going to deny our ability to order scans or labs that are crucial for carrying out safe patient care, at least make the appeal process easier so that we can do so”

Wall Street Apes

782,676 views • 1 year ago

🚨Neurosurgeon at UCLA dealing with a patient that suffers brain tumors UnitedHealthcare has denied his patient a MRI for lifesaving imaging!! “So UnitedHealthcare has once again disappointed me as an insurance company because they not only denied an MRI for one of my patients that needed advanced sequences for tumor surgery, but they denied a peer to peer. "Now, I thought things were supposed to get better after all the complaints on social media, the heat that they've had from all the public opinion. But to take away the peer to peer process and have us fill out a form that they're going to fax to us at some unknown time and date, this patient literally needs the SARI so that we can do a safer brain tumor surgery, and yet now they're removing the avenues through which we can even apply for that." "UnitedHealth, if you are going to deny our ability to order scans or labs that are crucial for carrying out safe patient care, at least make the appeal process easier so that we can do so”

🚨Neurosurgeon at UCLA dealing with a patient that suffers brain tumors UnitedHealthcare has denied his patient a MRI for lifesaving imaging!! “So UnitedHealthcare has once again disappointed me as an insurance company because they not only denied an MRI for one of my patients that needed advanced sequences for tumor surgery, but they denied a peer to peer. "Now, I thought things were supposed to get better after all the complaints on social media, the heat that they've had from all the public opinion. But to take away the peer to peer process and have us fill out a form that they're going to fax to us at some unknown time and date, this patient literally needs the SARI so that we can do a safer brain tumor surgery, and yet now they're removing the avenues through which we can even apply for that." "UnitedHealth, if you are going to deny our ability to order scans or labs that are crucial for carrying out safe patient care, at least make the appeal process easier so that we can do so”

Wall Street Mav

34,029 views • 11 months ago

It is 2026 and healthcare is still not making any common sense. Today, multiple cases were canceled again because of a facility issue. The operating rooms weren’t safe to operate in. So my breast cancer patients had their surgeries delayed for hours, and one had to be moved to another facility tomorrow. And what’s so frustrating is that I have an operating room I could take these cases to. It’s ready. It’s safe. But because insurance companies get to decide where we’re allowed to operate, I couldn’t use it. In this case, it was United. They haven’t approved me to be in network at my surgery center, so even though the OR was available, I wasn’t allowed to move the cases there. Other insurance companies have contracted and allow me to take care of patients there. So today, a patient didn’t get surgery when she could have.

It is 2026 and healthcare is still not making any common sense. Today, multiple cases were canceled again because of a facility issue. The operating rooms weren’t safe to operate in. So my breast cancer patients had their surgeries delayed for hours, and one had to be moved to another facility tomorrow. And what’s so frustrating is that I have an operating room I could take these cases to. It’s ready. It’s safe. But because insurance companies get to decide where we’re allowed to operate, I couldn’t use it. In this case, it was United. They haven’t approved me to be in network at my surgery center, so even though the OR was available, I wasn’t allowed to move the cases there. Other insurance companies have contracted and allow me to take care of patients there. So today, a patient didn’t get surgery when she could have.

Elisabeth Potter MD

53,161 views • 6 months ago

EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 🚨 American Surgeon just recorded her peer-to-peer phone call with an insurance company and they admit they have “Planned denials” She plays the recording in this clip, THIS IS CRIMINAL “I think we've all suspected that that's what's going on. But to hear him say that, that some of these denials are, you know, they're planned, it's already set in stone, and they're just going through the motions with the peer to peer, that was eye opening. And I think that term planned denial is something that is probably used internally in insurance companies, but rarely with doctors and patients. So the planned denial sounds like they've already decided, it's denied, and that's it.”

EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 🚨 American Surgeon just recorded her peer-to-peer phone call with an insurance company and they admit they have “Planned denials” She plays the recording in this clip, THIS IS CRIMINAL “I think we've all suspected that that's what's going on. But to hear him say that, that some of these denials are, you know, they're planned, it's already set in stone, and they're just going through the motions with the peer to peer, that was eye opening. And I think that term planned denial is something that is probably used internally in insurance companies, but rarely with doctors and patients. So the planned denial sounds like they've already decided, it's denied, and that's it.”

Wall Street Apes

761,350 views • 1 year ago

Rep. Roy on Obamacare: "They [Democrats] broke the system so badly that they are now coming and asking us to have the treasury print money to then give out in order to enrich insurance companies with massive subsidies. That's the actual fact. The American people understand this, and they recognize that they don't want insurance companies to be enriched, but they want to be able to go get the doctor of their choice. The American people understand this, and so do we. We're here to open the government, and we're here to stand up for doctors and patients, instead of insurance companies and big regulators."

Rep. Roy on Obamacare: "They [Democrats] broke the system so badly that they are now coming and asking us to have the treasury print money to then give out in order to enrich insurance companies with massive subsidies. That's the actual fact. The American people understand this, and they recognize that they don't want insurance companies to be enriched, but they want to be able to go get the doctor of their choice. The American people understand this, and so do we. We're here to open the government, and we're here to stand up for doctors and patients, instead of insurance companies and big regulators."

Rep. Chip Roy Press Office

46,563 views • 8 months ago

American Surgeon shows the actual letter from UnitedHealthcare DENYING a patient in emergency condition from receiving care “This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms” “I think we all knew this would happen. I had another patient come in and share with me that UnitedHealthcare denied her inpatient's day. So this is a patient who had shortness of breath and some chest pain, and she just knew that something wasn't right in her body. She had a family history of blood clots and she'd had a deep flap surgery a couple of weeks ago. She went to the hospital and they saw her and they found that she had a life threatening condition known as pulmonary embolisms. So she was admitted to the hospital and taken care of really well by the doctors there. And they ordered all the right things. After a couple of days, she was discharged. She got a letter from UnitedHealthcare explaining that they didn't agree with the level of her care and that they would not cover it. So I'm gonna share some of the language of that letter with you, and I want you to know that my patient that we talked about previously who had her surgery denied had almost exactly the same letter shared. So there's some troubling things in this letter. I think this term is really interesting. United is saying they reviewed the request for inpatient admission. So let's all just pause and consider that. This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms, and the doctor wasn't really requesting anything. They were saying this patient needs to be in the hospital. But an insurance company sees this as a request, and that's part of this prior auth environment that we're living in. So I think it's important as patients and as physicians to just acknowledge that this is our reality now. Someone can think that there's a good medical decision for you and can write orders and wanna do the right thing for you, but your insurance company is seeing that as a request and deciding whether or not they wanna do it. One of the criteria that this insurance company used to decide whether or not to accept or deny this request was whether it's medically necessary. And it's so interesting that we're letting insurance companies and the doctors who work for insurance companies determine what's medically necessary and not just the doctor in front of the patient in the emergency room. So this is a really bold statement from UnitedHealthcare for my patient. They say you did not have to be admitted as an inpatient to the hospital for this care. I think we all need to just reflect on that. An insurance company is telling a patient and her doctor that they disagree with the plan of care to keep that patient safe. I know that this is boiling down to whether it's an inpatient admission or an observation admission, and that's really about money. But what I wanna point out to you is they're making medical decisions. This insurance company is actually weighing in and disagreeing with a doctor who made a medical decision to admit this patient for her safety. So this specific sentence, when a doctor or facility treats a patient above the recommended level of care, we cannot cover it. What the heck? That's what we do. We go above and beyond as physicians. It's clear that insurance companies don't, and they're actually saying it here.”

American Surgeon shows the actual letter from UnitedHealthcare DENYING a patient in emergency condition from receiving care “This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms” “I think we all knew this would happen. I had another patient come in and share with me that UnitedHealthcare denied her inpatient's day. So this is a patient who had shortness of breath and some chest pain, and she just knew that something wasn't right in her body. She had a family history of blood clots and she'd had a deep flap surgery a couple of weeks ago. She went to the hospital and they saw her and they found that she had a life threatening condition known as pulmonary embolisms. So she was admitted to the hospital and taken care of really well by the doctors there. And they ordered all the right things. After a couple of days, she was discharged. She got a letter from UnitedHealthcare explaining that they didn't agree with the level of her care and that they would not cover it. So I'm gonna share some of the language of that letter with you, and I want you to know that my patient that we talked about previously who had her surgery denied had almost exactly the same letter shared. So there's some troubling things in this letter. I think this term is really interesting. United is saying they reviewed the request for inpatient admission. So let's all just pause and consider that. This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms, and the doctor wasn't really requesting anything. They were saying this patient needs to be in the hospital. But an insurance company sees this as a request, and that's part of this prior auth environment that we're living in. So I think it's important as patients and as physicians to just acknowledge that this is our reality now. Someone can think that there's a good medical decision for you and can write orders and wanna do the right thing for you, but your insurance company is seeing that as a request and deciding whether or not they wanna do it. One of the criteria that this insurance company used to decide whether or not to accept or deny this request was whether it's medically necessary. And it's so interesting that we're letting insurance companies and the doctors who work for insurance companies determine what's medically necessary and not just the doctor in front of the patient in the emergency room. So this is a really bold statement from UnitedHealthcare for my patient. They say you did not have to be admitted as an inpatient to the hospital for this care. I think we all need to just reflect on that. An insurance company is telling a patient and her doctor that they disagree with the plan of care to keep that patient safe. I know that this is boiling down to whether it's an inpatient admission or an observation admission, and that's really about money. But what I wanna point out to you is they're making medical decisions. This insurance company is actually weighing in and disagreeing with a doctor who made a medical decision to admit this patient for her safety. So this specific sentence, when a doctor or facility treats a patient above the recommended level of care, we cannot cover it. What the heck? That's what we do. We go above and beyond as physicians. It's clear that insurance companies don't, and they're actually saying it here.”

Wall Street Apes

115,712 views • 1 year ago

EVERYONE NEEDS TO SEE THIS 🚨 American doctor exposes new internal change to Blue Cross prior authorization process to deny coverage for Americans - They’ll only speak to the doctor who put in request - They WONT SAY WHAT NUMBER THEY’RE CALLING FROM - They’ll ONLY CALL ONCE - If they miss the call, the patient will be denied coverage for treatment “Now Blue Cross is saying that they will only do their peer to peer reviews by calling the doctor who is asking for the treatment to be authorized. And they will only call once, and they won't tell you when they're calling, and they won't tell you what number they're calling from.” “So if you're a doctor seeing patients and you have your phone on do not disturb because you're seeing patients or you just don't answer numbers that you don't recognize, and you're seeing patients and you don't wanna interrupt a a patient visit, you're gonna miss the call. And guess what? The treatment will not be authorized” “They're getting more creative about how to deny your claims or just not authorize your treatment at all. I'm going on information given to me by Blue Cross. I am a physician. When we physicians ask for a treatment to be authorized by an insurance company and they deny authorization, what happens at that point is that we are asked to do a peer to peer review, meaning that we, the doctor asking for the treatment, have to speak with the doctor who is employed by the insurance company, who is there only to say no.” THIS IS INSANE

EVERYONE NEEDS TO SEE THIS 🚨 American doctor exposes new internal change to Blue Cross prior authorization process to deny coverage for Americans - They’ll only speak to the doctor who put in request - They WONT SAY WHAT NUMBER THEY’RE CALLING FROM - They’ll ONLY CALL ONCE - If they miss the call, the patient will be denied coverage for treatment “Now Blue Cross is saying that they will only do their peer to peer reviews by calling the doctor who is asking for the treatment to be authorized. And they will only call once, and they won't tell you when they're calling, and they won't tell you what number they're calling from.” “So if you're a doctor seeing patients and you have your phone on do not disturb because you're seeing patients or you just don't answer numbers that you don't recognize, and you're seeing patients and you don't wanna interrupt a a patient visit, you're gonna miss the call. And guess what? The treatment will not be authorized” “They're getting more creative about how to deny your claims or just not authorize your treatment at all. I'm going on information given to me by Blue Cross. I am a physician. When we physicians ask for a treatment to be authorized by an insurance company and they deny authorization, what happens at that point is that we are asked to do a peer to peer review, meaning that we, the doctor asking for the treatment, have to speak with the doctor who is employed by the insurance company, who is there only to say no.” THIS IS INSANE

Wall Street Apes

1,465,586 views • 1 year ago

Dingell: They are going to rip healthcare away from almost 14 million people. When I was at home, a mother had her child in a wheelchair and started crying on the elevator—she wanted me to promise her that her child would still be able to go to the doctor. Children’s Hospital in Detroit—75% of the patients there are on Medicaid. I had a senior come up to me at a town hall and ask, “Are they going to kick my husband out of a nursing home?”

Dingell: They are going to rip healthcare away from almost 14 million people. When I was at home, a mother had her child in a wheelchair and started crying on the elevator—she wanted me to promise her that her child would still be able to go to the doctor. Children’s Hospital in Detroit—75% of the patients there are on Medicaid. I had a senior come up to me at a town hall and ask, “Are they going to kick my husband out of a nursing home?”

Acyn

41,973 views • 1 year ago

American is extremely frustrated because she’s wants to get on disability She says the amount of work they are making her do to prove she’s disabled, she might as well just apply for a job. But she won’t give up because she wants disability “They make you have to prove this and this and this and this, and they make you do the work to get all your medical records, and they make you do all the work to prove everything, and they make you do all the work to apply with all their paperwork that they've made. Hundreds of papers that you have to go through. I mean, tons of paperwork that you have to go through — How am I supposed to do the work that goes into this when it's nearly the same amount of work as getting a job. Like, applying for disability is the same process as applying for a job, basically” I think it’s pretty clear this is most likely abuse of our welfare system Her profile bio says she’s 27 and an activist…..

Wall Street Apes

232,683 views • 9 days ago

American doctor goes over how Barack Obama destroyed American Healthcare Before Obamacare in 2010 - A family of 4 had $13,000 per year in premiums with a $3,000 deductible Now in 2025 - A family of 4 had $35,000 per year in premiums with a $6,000 deductible “Obamacare has now been around for 15 years and the promise was that it was gonna save us dramatically on our healthcare spending and make us healthier. - And if you look at 2010 for a family of four, their premiums were about $13,000 and they had about $3,000 to $4,000 in deductibles - Now you go to 2025, that has jumped to $35,000 about a $5,000 to $6,000 deductible. What's happening now is we have what's called functionally uninsured patients. That means they have insurance, they think that they're okay, then they get sick, they go to the ER, they present their magic insurance card, and they find out they have a $5,000 deductible. That means they have to pay $5,000 before the first dollar of coverage. Now, the ER for sure is going to eat up that $5,000 deductible. What that means is patients now have ongoing medical debt. So has Obamacare saved us money? No, unfortunately not. What it has done is made the system very, very complex. You've had the growth of very small to moderate insurance companies to huge insurance companies. There's now 7 insurance companies that are in the Fortune 500 right now.”

American doctor goes over how Barack Obama destroyed American Healthcare Before Obamacare in 2010 - A family of 4 had $13,000 per year in premiums with a $3,000 deductible Now in 2025 - A family of 4 had $35,000 per year in premiums with a $6,000 deductible “Obamacare has now been around for 15 years and the promise was that it was gonna save us dramatically on our healthcare spending and make us healthier. - And if you look at 2010 for a family of four, their premiums were about $13,000 and they had about $3,000 to $4,000 in deductibles - Now you go to 2025, that has jumped to $35,000 about a $5,000 to $6,000 deductible. What's happening now is we have what's called functionally uninsured patients. That means they have insurance, they think that they're okay, then they get sick, they go to the ER, they present their magic insurance card, and they find out they have a $5,000 deductible. That means they have to pay $5,000 before the first dollar of coverage. Now, the ER for sure is going to eat up that $5,000 deductible. What that means is patients now have ongoing medical debt. So has Obamacare saved us money? No, unfortunately not. What it has done is made the system very, very complex. You've had the growth of very small to moderate insurance companies to huge insurance companies. There's now 7 insurance companies that are in the Fortune 500 right now.”

Wall Street Apes

1,615,273 views • 9 months ago

American nurse exposes a new change is coming, they will no longer be able to advise patients who call in over the phone 🚨 An artificial intelligence will listen in on all their calls and prompt them on what to say to patients going forward “This is a story about how AI is taking over health care. So I work as a nurse and I have several jobs. One of them, I work from home, as you can tell by my appearance today. And I work as a triage nurse where people will call in and say they're having certain symptoms. And I tell them, you know, you should go to the emergency room, you should call 9-1-1 you can take care of this at home, you know, whatever. And we've been informed that we are now going to be prompted by an AI chat function that listens to our conversations and prompts us with what it wants us to say” He goes on to explain how this AI tool is going to most likely be used to replace nurses

American nurse exposes a new change is coming, they will no longer be able to advise patients who call in over the phone 🚨 An artificial intelligence will listen in on all their calls and prompt them on what to say to patients going forward “This is a story about how AI is taking over health care. So I work as a nurse and I have several jobs. One of them, I work from home, as you can tell by my appearance today. And I work as a triage nurse where people will call in and say they're having certain symptoms. And I tell them, you know, you should go to the emergency room, you should call 9-1-1 you can take care of this at home, you know, whatever. And we've been informed that we are now going to be prompted by an AI chat function that listens to our conversations and prompts us with what it wants us to say” He goes on to explain how this AI tool is going to most likely be used to replace nurses

Wall Street Apes

240,343 views • 9 months ago

Dr. Caleb Masterson say health insurance companies are openly breaking laws in Alabama He explains some of his patients situations with insurance companies - “I had an insurance company tell a patient that no authorization for the procedure was required, the procedure was performed, and then the patient was denied the care because the procedure was never authorized. So the patient got charged the entire cost of the procedure” - “I had another patient who is supposed to be due an answer to an insurance claim within 30 days of submission. If they do not reply within 30 days, that's breaking Alabama law. And that claim is currently at the 65th day, so its insurance can be breaking the law.” - “Then I had an insurance company deny care to a patient that they had previously approved. So a patient qualified for surgery based on medical necessity, they had met all the criteria for surgery, they underwent surgery, then the patient had that surgery denied. The patient submitted that information to the insurance company and said, Hey, look, this was already pre-approved. And they said, We reversed our decision and the patient had to pay.”

Dr. Caleb Masterson say health insurance companies are openly breaking laws in Alabama He explains some of his patients situations with insurance companies - “I had an insurance company tell a patient that no authorization for the procedure was required, the procedure was performed, and then the patient was denied the care because the procedure was never authorized. So the patient got charged the entire cost of the procedure” - “I had another patient who is supposed to be due an answer to an insurance claim within 30 days of submission. If they do not reply within 30 days, that's breaking Alabama law. And that claim is currently at the 65th day, so its insurance can be breaking the law.” - “Then I had an insurance company deny care to a patient that they had previously approved. So a patient qualified for surgery based on medical necessity, they had met all the criteria for surgery, they underwent surgery, then the patient had that surgery denied. The patient submitted that information to the insurance company and said, Hey, look, this was already pre-approved. And they said, We reversed our decision and the patient had to pay.”

Wall Street Apes

46,070 views • 6 months ago

American Healthcare worker speaks out about insurance companies “We had a patient that was so f*cking sick in the hospital” and the insurance company wanted them to send the patient home “For SEVEN WEEKS STRAIGHT, they gave us a last day of coverage, for seven weeks straight, we appealed to Medicare and won because Medicare thought it was unsafe for this patient to go home”

American Healthcare worker speaks out about insurance companies “We had a patient that was so f*cking sick in the hospital” and the insurance company wanted them to send the patient home “For SEVEN WEEKS STRAIGHT, they gave us a last day of coverage, for seven weeks straight, we appealed to Medicare and won because Medicare thought it was unsafe for this patient to go home”

Wall Street Apes

182,192 views • 1 year ago

Chip Roy: "We need to give freedom options for the average hardworking American family so you can afford a catastrophic plan, go get health sharing, be able to have something that you can be able to go to the doctor of your choice rather than enriching insurance companies."

Chip Roy: "We need to give freedom options for the average hardworking American family so you can afford a catastrophic plan, go get health sharing, be able to have something that you can be able to go to the doctor of your choice rather than enriching insurance companies."

Aaron Rupar

107,557 views • 8 months ago

American says her primary care provider started sending out notices to all his patients He says US Insurance Company reimbursements to providers are so low he will now be charging $3,000 per year for 1 person and $10,000 per year per family to continue going to his practice “Yesterday my husband received a letter from his primary care physician, who, by the way, he's been seeing for about 20 years now, maybe even longer, stating that because the insurance companies are offering lower reimbursements for visits, they're requiring that each patient has to pay to go to them. They want him to pay $3,000 a year to continue to go to them — For families, it goes up to $10,000 a year” “If they're going to pay this amount of money, then they can continue to go there. But if you decide that you don't want to pay this money, guess what? You're thrown out. You have to get a new doctor. This is f*cking bullsh*t” Insurance companies rip off providers so now American people get robbed even more

American says her primary care provider started sending out notices to all his patients He says US Insurance Company reimbursements to providers are so low he will now be charging $3,000 per year for 1 person and $10,000 per year per family to continue going to his practice “Yesterday my husband received a letter from his primary care physician, who, by the way, he's been seeing for about 20 years now, maybe even longer, stating that because the insurance companies are offering lower reimbursements for visits, they're requiring that each patient has to pay to go to them. They want him to pay $3,000 a year to continue to go to them — For families, it goes up to $10,000 a year” “If they're going to pay this amount of money, then they can continue to go there. But if you decide that you don't want to pay this money, guess what? You're thrown out. You have to get a new doctor. This is fcking bullsht” Insurance companies rip off providers so now American people get robbed even more

Wall Street Apes

234,597 views • 11 months ago

American Physician Assistant who has worked in cardiology for 8 years says “I have NEVER seen so many echos denied like I have this year” She says health insurance companies are denying routine scans at rates like never before and making it harder to appeal. Just this one phone call she spent 41 minutes of her lunch trying to get approved through the prior authorization department This video shows how many runarounds and multiple numbers and transfers the insurance companies make doctors offices go through, making it literally impossible to get things approved Health insurance companies just keep getting worse and worse

American Physician Assistant who has worked in cardiology for 8 years says “I have NEVER seen so many echos denied like I have this year” She says health insurance companies are denying routine scans at rates like never before and making it harder to appeal. Just this one phone call she spent 41 minutes of her lunch trying to get approved through the prior authorization department This video shows how many runarounds and multiple numbers and transfers the insurance companies make doctors offices go through, making it literally impossible to get things approved Health insurance companies just keep getting worse and worse

Wall Street Apes

455,716 views • 11 months ago