Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

American Groyper

118,343 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

This is some black magic Dave brings up the classic groyper question of 'do you blame jewish supremacy for our problems, or just Israel?' The slight of hand comes when he defines jewish supremacy as jews thinking their culture is best. But the groyper theory isn't just that jews prefer their own culture, it's that they control ours. Everyone knows jews prefer their religion, like everyone else. It's only relevant under presumptions of control. The debate is not 'does Israel controls us or are jews are bigoted?' Those are unrelated propositions. The problem is if Dave says 'it's just Israel' he will lose the debate to Nick with people who have adopted their framwork of jewish/israeli control, because throwing in jews is a more holistic explanation. So it's easier for Dave to pretend jewish supremacy in that context means bigotry. That way he can agree with Nick without having to affirm or challenge Nicks idea that "the jews are at the center of everything." Half of Gen Z now thinks they grew up under a system of Jewish or zionist oppression that is at the center of everything bad in their life. That's what we mean when we say they have applied the leftist idea of white supremacy to jews. That is not normal and not a single prominent American libertarian has done anything except fan the flames of Marxist oppression politics within their own side by pretending Israel controls us. Dan Bilzerian is right about them being subversive, he’s just too retarded to realize it’s helping his cause, as Nick has tried to explain to him.

Austin Padgett (LudwigNeverMises)

18,209 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨 Springfield, Ohio Two Surreal Testimonies from a Recent City Commission Meeting about the Illegal Alien Haitian Takeover VIDEO #1 🔴 Women who’s lived in her home for 45 years breaks down… —— “it’s so unsafe in my neighborhood..” and homeless foreign men are camping out on her property —— I have men who cannot speak English on my front yard, screaming at me, throwing mattresses in my front yard, throwing trash in my front yard…. —— I understand you are protecting them, but who’s protecting the citizens? Who’s protecting me? “Look at me, I weigh 95 pounds and couldn’t defend myself if I had to.” 💔 🧢 Geoffrey Martin is a Pedophile Groyper VIDEO #2 🔴 Man describes what everyday life is like in Springfield —— Haitians are flipping over trash cans, they’re running into buildings, they’re flipping cars in the middle of the street. —— I feel like people are getting paid for this in the background. —— there’s nothing but immigrants at the Welfare office —— it’s unsafe for kids to walk to school. “They’re in the park, grabbing up ducks by their neck, cutting their heads off and walking off with them and eating them…” The people listening to these American citizens doesn’t give two-shits about what they have to say… 🔴 VIDEO 3 Reminder… Springfield Ohio’s Illegal Alien Haitian Population has Increased 20,000 over the Last Four Years in a Community of 58,000 Residents

MJTruthUltra

892,322 просмотров • 1 год назад

“Why Did Thomas Massie Lose?” Because Thomas Massie changed, the GOP didn’t. As Sean Davis 🤵 pointed out, Thomas Massie went toe-to-toe against Trump on COVID in 2020 and won 81-19… Then he turned into an obstructionist obsessed with Epstein—an issue he didn’t care about at all under Biden—and GOP voters recognized it. He became more concerned with clicks and clout than securing the border. He started running across the aisle to vote, thinking buddying up with terrorist support Ro Khanna was something his constituents wanted to see. His actions and rhetoric (including accusing his detractors of getting paid “$7,000” for posts) had no discernible difference between that and the Israel obsessed, anti-American, anti-agency Groyper Smurf Army. Look at the list of his endorsers as pointed out by people like Max 📟, Green Beret Nap Time, and Nick Matau, and tell me, does this look like a guy who was running for a GOP primary or a Democrat primary in Dearborn, Michigan? CAIR Code Pink Ro Khanna Jack Dorsey The Quincy Institute Joy Behar Jasmine Crocket AOC Jasmine Crockett MediasTouch The Atlantic The New York Times Rashida Tlaib Ilhan Omar The Krassenstiens David Hogg Trita Parsi Iranian state media CCP officials The ACLU Hasan Piker Sneako Tucker Carlson Candace Owens Why did Thomas Massie lose? Because he thought online votes counted in Kentucky. For a guy who is hailed as living off the grid, the only thing he seemed to care about during this campaign was the grid, was the algorithm. The algorithm didn’t speak last night. Real Kentuckians did. And they said, “No Mas(sie)!”

Jake Donnelly

23,064 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

𝗙𝗥𝗔𝗡𝗞𝗟𝗜𝗡 𝗚𝗥𝗔𝗛𝗔𝗠 𝗦𝗘𝗡𝗧 𝗧𝗥𝗨𝗠𝗣 𝗔 𝗟𝗘𝗧𝗧𝗘𝗥 𝗖𝗔𝗟𝗟𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗧𝗨𝗖𝗞𝗘𝗥 𝗖𝗔𝗥𝗟𝗦𝗢𝗡 𝗔𝗡 𝗔𝗡𝗧𝗜-𝗦𝗘𝗠𝗜𝗧𝗘 — 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗧𝗨𝗖𝗞𝗘𝗥 𝗟𝗢𝗦𝗧 𝗜𝗧 Tucker found out when Trump showed him the letter in person. He immediately tried to reach Graham. Texted back and forth with Graham's assistant all day. Graham wouldn't take the call. Tucker called the behavior "unchristian, sneaky, and dishonest." And on the process point alone, he has a fair grievance — if you think someone holds a view that serious, confront them directly first. But here's what Tucker left out of his wounded monologue. Franklin Graham didn't write that letter in a vacuum. He built a file. In 2024, Tucker hosted revisionist historian Daryl Cooper — who argued that Churchill, not Hitler, was the chief villain of World War II and that the Nazis did not intend to k!ll Jews — and praised Cooper as "the best and most honest popular historian in America." In December 2025, Tucker dismissed polling showing conservatives view radical Islam as America's greatest threat, falsely claimed no one in the US has been k!lled by radical Islam in 24 years, and argued that persuading white Americans to fear radical Islam is "an op" run by Israel. He called American Jewish Zionists Israel's "informal employees in the United States." At Charlie Kirk's memorial service, Tucker described the crucifixion of Jesus in a way that both critics and supporters interpreted as implying Jews or Israelis were behind Kirk's ass∗ssination. He then interviewed Nick Fuentes — a self-described neo-Nazi and groyper — on his show, sitting with him for a friendly conversation about "Zionist Jews." He platformed Joe Kent, who resigned from Congress blaming "Israel and its powerful American lobby" and went on Tucker's show to insinuate Israeli involvement in Kirk's d∗ath. A study by the Jewish People Policy Institute tracking 3,000 Tucker videos found that by mid-2025, roughly 70% of his references to Israel were negative — up from 50% earlier that year — with AI sentiment analysis flagging a clear escalation toward content meeting the IHRA definition of antisemitism. Israel's Diaspora Minister called Tucker "the leading platform for fringe Holocaust deniers, conspiracy theorists, and blood libel enthusiasts who oppose the State of Israel." StopAntisemitism named him Antisemite of the Year for 2025. Tucker wants to know why Graham didn't call him first. 𝗚𝗿𝗮𝗵𝗮𝗺 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗱. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗱 𝗶𝘀 𝗲𝘅𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗶𝘃𝗲. Franklin Graham is 74 years old and has spent his entire life standing with Israel and the Jewish people. When he sees something that concerns him at this level, he goes straight to the president. That's not sneaky. 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁'𝘀 𝗮 𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄𝘀 𝗲𝘅𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗹𝘆 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿.

M.A. Rothman

45,200 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

D'Souza Exposes Nihilistic Intent in the GOP! Carlson aims "to cow JD Vance into submission," by leveraging personal ties." ~ Dinesh D'Souza In a candid discussion on Chicks on the Right, Dinesh D'Souza dissected the provocative tactics of far-right figure Nick Fuentes, portraying him as a calculated performer whose rhetoric fuels division within the Republican Party. "Nick basically, you know, puts on his little narrow tie and his navy blazer," D'Souza observed, likening Fuentes' style to "a certain type of performance artistry." D'Souza acknowledged the malice behind it, stating unequivocally, "Is it malevolent? Yes. Is he an anti-Semite? Yes." Yet D'Souza urged a deeper understanding of the appeal: Fuentes' words resonate with "basement dwellers" harboring "nihilistic" resentment toward an "establishment that runs both parties," where "elites have put everybody at the top of the list and they are at the bottom." This "performance politics," as D'Souza called it, thrives on such "fumes," drawing in disillusioned followers who see the system as rigged against them. Pressed on Fuentes' ultimate aim, D'Souza described it as harnessing "a certain type of dark energy" that Fuentes wields to "skirt the edge" without fully crossing into irrelevance. "Essentially what he's doing is he's trying to burn it all down, which is what all nihilists try to do," D'Souza explained. Far from seeking organized reform, Fuentes engages in "a kind of pyromania," politically igniting chaos in hopes that "out of the ashes your side will emerge stronger." Co-host Mock probed whether this was deliberate sabotage: "Do you think that he is just some sort of an agent to sow discord and like chaos in the Republican Party?" D'Souza affirmed the destructive intent, contrasting it with Tucker Carlson's more strategic maneuvering, which he hinted plays out differently but with equal peril. Shifting to Carlson, D'Souza painted a picture of calculated influence over emerging GOP leaders like JD Vance. "I think the game that Tucker's playing is not whether he votes Republican. I don't think he cares about that," he said. Instead, Carlson aims "to cow JD Vance into submission," by leveraging personal ties. "He thinks Vance is in his back pocket. He thinks Vance owes him because Tucker put Vance into the Senate," D'Souza noted, adding that while he's given up on Trump, Carlson "bets that the future of the Republican Party belongs to him because he controls JD Vance." Though D'Souza praised Vance as "a really smart guy" and unlikely to embrace full bigotry, he warned of the "very malevolent game" and its "serious consequences" for the party's direction.'' The conversation turned to Vance's recent appearance at an Ohio State University Turning Point event, where "groyper infiltrators" seemed to dominate the Q&A. "It did seem like some of the audience members were groper infiltrators, right? The way that they were framing their questions," Mock said, expressing concern over Vance's diplomatic responses and the mounting pressure from figures like Carlson and Fuentes. D'Souza empathized, sensing Vance's internal struggle amid a generation feeling the "American dream has eluded them." These young people, he argued, have absorbed narratives of a "deep state" from conservatives like himself, only for pipers like Carlson and Candace Owens to twist it into anti-Semitic conspiracy: "This whole entire system is being puppeteered by the elite of the elites, namely that's the Jews." Post-COVID disillusionment with Fauci, the FBI, and academia has made them vulnerable, D'Souza said. They are not "entirely bad people," but prey to those "leading them to the precipice." The real challenge for Vance, and the broader right, isn't blunt denunciation, which could backfire into the hands of provocateurs, but redirection: "How do we lead them away from the precipice instead of to the precipice?"

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

77,681 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Unmasking Nick Fuentes NCRI Report: James Lindsay Warns of a Sabotage Operation Targeting Trump's Legacy! “All of a sudden we have a movement appear out of thin air, get amplified by all these shady actors, put on every effing podcast… Don’t tell me this isn’t an operation.” In last night's episode of Apostate Radio, cultural critic James Lindsay dissected the seismic shift in American politics that propelled Donald Trump to victory in every swing state during the 2024 election. Lindsay attributed Trump's triumph not merely to Republican enthusiasm, but to a profound disillusionment among Democratic voters. "He wins every freaking swing state," Lindsay observed. "Why? Because about four to five million Democrats decided that whatever the Democratic Party is doing is bad enough to where they're not going to vote for it again." This abstention, he argued, stemmed from the Democrats' unyielding embrace of polarizing social issues, particularly transgender rights, which have become an electoral anchor dragging the party underwater. Lindsay highlighted stark polling data to illustrate the Democrats' vulnerability. Citing a recent poll by Scott Rasmussen, he noted that support for transgender policies hovers at a mere 17%, with 83% of the population opposing them, a ratio he dubbed "17/83." "The trans issue is sinking the out of the Democrats because they're completely wedded to it," Lindsay explained. "And it's going to take them to the bottom of the sea." In contrast, he pointed out, the Republican platform had historically avoided such "millstones", extreme positions, that alienate the broader electorate. That is, until the emergence of what Lindsay terms the "woke right," a fringe movement intent on mirroring the left's most repugnant excesses to tarnish the entire conservative coalition. Central to Lindsay's critique is Nick Fuentes, the far-right provocateur whose inflammatory rhetoric has been thrust into the spotlight. Fuentes' antisemitic commentary fares even worse in public opinion, with 95% opposition—a "5/95" rating that renders him toxic. "You can't [have] a 5/95 guy as the face of the Republican party," Lindsay asserted, questioning the sudden social ascent of Fuentes across podcasts and mainstream media. "Don't tell me this isn't an operation," he charged. "And don't tell me his point isn't to make sure that the Trump coalition can't continue after he is out of office." For Lindsay, the "woke right" serves a deliberate purpose: to render the right "just as stinky, just as bad, just as scary as the left," ensuring that any post-Trump conservative resurgence is potentially doomed. Bolstering Lindsay's suspicions of orchestration is a forensic analysis released by the Network Contagion Research Institute (NCRI), as detailed in a comprehensive thread by data analyst DataRepublican. The report, titled "America Last: How Fuentes's Coordinated Raids and Foreign Fake Speech Networks Inflate His Influence," unveils a web of synthetic amplification that propelled Fuentes' visibility far beyond organic reach. NCRI's investigation revealed that Fuentes' posts often garnered more early retweets than those from major figures, despite vastly smaller followings. Normalizing for audience size, the disparity was glaring: in the first 30 minutes of key posts, Fuentes dominated velocity charts in patterns "unusually fast, unusually concentrated, and unusually foreign," hallmarks of coordinated manipulation networks rather than grassroots participation. The analysis exposed a cadre of anonymous, single-purpose "Groyper" accounts; 92% lacking profiles, photos, or locations, that accounted for 61% of initial retweets, repeatedly boosting Fuentes across multiple threads in violation of platform anti-spam rules. Even more damning were the foreign engagement clusters from nations like India, Pakistan, Nigeria, Malaysia, and Indonesia, regions notorious for low-cost bot farms with no natural affinity for Fuentes' America First isolationism. NCRI documented Fuentes actively directing these "raids" via real-time commands in private chats, alongside allegations of inflated streaming metrics. As mainstream media coverage of Fuentes surged in late 2025, the report linked this to algorithmic elevation of manipulated content. This manufactured ascent aligns eerily with Lindsay's thesis, suggesting a deliberate effort to embed extremism within Trump's orbit and fracture its longevity. As the Trump coalition prepares for a successor once Trump leaves office, the "woke" influencers are aiming to dismantle the conservative coalition. Lindsay's warnings and NCRI's data underscores a broader battle: not just against left-wing overreach, but against internal saboteurs engineering division. If the "woke right" succeeds in defining conservatism through figures like Fuentes, Trump's hard-won coalition risks dissolution, leaving the field wide open for renewed Democratic dominance. Can the right outflank the foreign influence hybrid warfare saboteurs?

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

13,964 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Americans Have No Idea Who Their Government Is Bombing An article by Antiwar’s Dave DeCamp has highlighted the widely-ignored fact that according to AFRICOM the US waged a three-day bombing campaign in Somalia from October 26 — October 28, bringing the total number of US airstrikes in that nation this year to 89. What percentage of Americans even realize that Trump has bombed Somalia nearly a hundred times this year? I doubt it’s even one percent. The mainstream press barely mention it. Americans have hardly any idea who their own country is bombing. In theory the press are there to create an informed electorate who can then use their votes to move their government in a healthy direction. In practice the press are there to keep the public too ignorant, propagandized and distracted to meddle in the workings of the imperial machine. ❖ Israel keeps violating the “ceasefire” and bombing Gaza whenever it wants to, then saying the ceasefire is back in effect. It’s like saying you’ve quit smoking whenever you’re not currently having a cigarette. NPR reports that after a mid-“ceasefire” bombing campaign that killed 104 people including 46 children, Benjamin Netanyahu “ordered the strikes after accusing Hamas of violating the ceasefire for handing over body parts this week that Israel said were partial remains of a hostage recovered earlier in the war.” Saying you massacred children because you weren’t given the correct pieces of a corpse just might be the craziest justification for a war crime that anyone has ever offered. ❖ Israeli UN Ambassador Danny Danon accused UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese of witchcraft for her report on Israel’s genocidal atrocities in Gaza. That’s right. Witchcraft. “Miss Albanese, you are a witch and this report is another page in your spell book,” Danon said in response to Albanese’s remarks to the UN’s Third Committee on Gaza. Says a lot about the strength of their arguments, really. Pro-Palestine arguments are like, “Here’s raw video footage of atrocities, IDF admissions of war crimes, IDF soldiers documenting their own sadism, eyewitness testimony from western doctors, and analysis from every major human rights group,” while pro-Israel arguments are like, “You’re a witch doing witchcraft!” ❖ Israeli media report that their government is preparing to wage a “propaganda war” for when foreign journalists are able to gain access to Gaza in advance of the expected PR fallout as the world learns “the human stories from Gaza in the voices and faces of the residents themselves.” It’s such a trip how as a state the Israelis understand the importance of perception management more acutely than any nation on earth, but as individuals they still can’t resist the urge to club an old woman on camera or post pictures of themselves wearing stolen panties in Gaza. Really drives home how the entire state is premised on the understanding that its existence depends on actively cultivating the support of powerful western military forces using aggressive lobbying and propaganda campaigns, but the state is also premised on extreme hatred and racism, and these two essential ingredients are clashing with more and more regularity when it comes to Gaza. ❖ It’s not okay to still support a two-state solution in 2025. Israel has spent two years showing the world that it should not exist as a state. It needs to be disarmed, dismantled, and denazified. It was still excusable to naively believe a two-state solution was workable prior to 2023, but after two years of Israeli officials openly saying with the overwhelming support of their citizenry that there will never be a Palestinian state while committing a genocide in full view of the entire world, this is no longer a tenable position to have. There is no longer any excuse for still believing the state of Israel will allow the Palestinians to have a fully sovereign state and leave them in peace, especially not after watching it wage war on all its neighbors with the blatantly obvious goal of domination and territorial expansion. The Israel experiment has been run. The results of that experiment show that it is not workable. Everything we’ve seen these last two years is the result of Zionists getting everything they want. This is what that looks like. The world needs to terminate the experiment by any means necessary and end the Zionist state forever. ❖ Groyper leader Nick Fuentes just went on Infowars to join Alex Jones in endorsing regime change interventionism in Venezuela by the Trump administration. The entire American right is just Dick Cheney wearing various costumes. The empire doesn’t just control the opposition, it controls the opposition to the opposition. ❖ Reading by Tim Foley:

Caitlin Johnstone

43,385 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад