Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

American is going over her LensCrafters paperwork when she notices something strange in the terms of service She has to authorize giving her health information to the federal government so it can be used to “provide protection to the president, their authorized persons or foreign heads estate, or to...

117,478 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Texas Sheriff Roy Boyd says their investigations have found the Mexican Government works directly with the cartels So much so, that America has given Mexico money to go after the cartel and instead the cartel was allowed to use the money to take out their enemies “The problem is the cartels and the government of Mexico have been in business for quite some time, that they're now to the point of almost being indistinguishable because the Mexican government is directly involved in the narcotics trade as well. In some of our investigations where the drugs weren't coming from the cartels. The drugs were actually coming from members of the Mexican government. And so I think that the only way to get Mexico to move and do something is to put those pressures on them. But you also have to realize, kind of like when we gave all that money to the Mexican government to go after the Sinaloa Cartel, did they go after the Sinaloa cartel? No, they went to the Sinaloa cartel and said, hey, we need to show the Americans that we're actually doing something. Who are the people you want eliminated? And so we basically spent our tax dollars in America to try to eliminate the Sinaloa cartel. And the Mexican government used that money to help Sinaloa cartel eliminate their competition. So if we're going to deal with the Mexican government, it has to be purely in a punitive measure. It can't be in a form of a grant or assets, because if you send it south of the border, it's going to be used for the benefit of the cartels.”

Wall Street Apes

194,012 views • 1 year ago

🚨To fight digital IDs in the U.S., you must ditch your REAL ID🚨 "The REAL ID is a federal ID masquerading as a state driver's license...the federal gov't has hijacked the state DMVs...according to the law [gov't] can require it for anything...the [DHS] Secretary determines." This clip of Twila Brase (Twila Brase, RN, PHN, Author), author and co-founder of Citizens' Council for Health Freedom, is taken from a discussion with Catherine Austin Fitts (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts) et al. posted to the Children's Health Defense (Children’s Health Defense) Rumble channel on November 13, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- Catherine Austin Fitts: "A REAL ID is something that evolved from an effort to get a national ID at the time of the Patriot Act, and it's been integrated with the driver's licenses in every state. So most people get a REAL ID attached or integrated into their driver's license, correct?" Brase: "Yeah. Although I'd like to say it sort of the other way around. What they have is a real ID, and the federal government is allowing the state to use it for driving. Driving purposes. And so, one of the things I just like to say to get people to understand how this is working is that when you have a REAL ID, the REAL ID is a federal ID masquerading as a state driver's license. People see it looks just like their driver's license before they got a REAL ID, but they do notice that there's a star on it. So it's a— It's a whole masquerading process here which is keeping the American people from understanding what's happening. "And essentially the, the federal government has hijacked the state DMVs by virtue of the fact that the legislators around the country, have decided to bow to the federal government to give up the constitutional rights and the 10th Amendment rights of the people and the states and hand it over to the federal government. "So the federal government has nationalized identification and driving privileges. Or you could say that they have nationalized identification through the REAL ID and then told the states, yeah, you can use it as a, as a driver's license. We will allow you to use it as a driver's license, but we require it for getting on a plane, we require it for federal buildings, we require it for nuclear facilities. And according to the law, we can require it for anything that we want that the Secretary determines. "And so... It's a federal ID, and it could be a federal ID that you— that would be required for you to open a bank account, to access medical care, to go to college— or rent a hotel room or rent a car or get married or anything, because that's what the law says. The law says that its official purposes include any purpose that the Secretary of Homeland Security shall determine. So any purpose. And right now, the American people don't realize the system that's being set up here. "I think the other thing to understand about REAL ID is that the federal government is creating a facial recognition system for the country through the REAL ID, because the real ID requires a biometric, starting with the face. And so, you know, the idea that the government is going to— has claimed a right to collect and capture the coordinates of your body for their control should be anathema to every American. "But Americans don't realize this. They don't realize that the picture that's being taken is a digital picture for the creation of a facial recognition system. A government facial recognition system where all of people's faces are being put into a database. And I'm going to add here because a lot of people, they go to the DMV and they don't understand the picture that's being taken. They just think it's a picture, right? They don't, they don't understand. But what they do understand is that when they go to fly, they're being asked to stand in front of a camera there. So what I'd like to say about that is, so this whole facial recognition system is being created through the REAL ID and about 56% of the American public have their faces in the government database already."

Sense Receptor

48,268 views • 10 months ago

This is why the Mexico City protests happened Texas Sheriff Roy Boyd says their investigations have found the Mexican Government works directly with the cartels ‌ So much so, that America has given Mexico money to go after the cartel and instead the cartel was allowed to use the money to take out their enemies ‌ “The problem is the cartels and the government of Mexico have been in business for quite some time, that they're now to the point of almost being indistinguishable because the Mexican government is directly involved in the narcotics trade as well. ‌ In some of our investigations where the drugs weren't coming from the cartels. The drugs were actually coming from members of the Mexican government. And so I think that the only way to get Mexico to move and do something is to put those pressures on them. ‌ But you also have to realize, kind of like when we gave all that money to the Mexican government to go after the Sinaloa Cartel, did they go after the Sinaloa cartel? No, they went to the Sinaloa cartel and said, hey, we need to show the Americans that we're actually doing something. Who are the people you want eliminated? And so we basically spent our tax dollars in America to try to eliminate the Sinaloa cartel. And the Mexican government used that money to help Sinaloa cartel eliminate their competition. ‌ So if we're going to deal with the Mexican government, it has to be purely in a punitive measure. It can't be in a form of a grant or assets, because if you send it south of the border, it's going to be used for the benefit of the cartels.”

Wall Street Apes

869,794 views • 10 months ago

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents stalked a U.S. citizen, at a POLLING PLACE, to pressure her into deleting her post, from JANUARY, about indicting ICE agent, Jonathan Ross. The exact post read: The ICE agent who shot and killed Renee Good in broad daylight has been identified as Jonathan Ross by the Minnesota Star Tribune. I think today is a great day for Jonathan to be indicted! FEDERAL AGENTS walked into a polling place… one of the most protected civic spaces we have… to intimidate a citizen, over political speech, about holding law enforcement accountable. The document they handed her said… “This notice officially informs you that it is unlawful to threaten to assault, kidnap, and/or murder a federal official or that federal official’s immediate family member with the intent to impede, intimidate, and/or interfere with the federal official’s duties or retaliate against a federal official due to the performance of their duties,” The document also said she could be subject to both federal and state prosecution. And just to be clear… The post, in question, wasn’t “doxxing.” Doxxing is releasing private, non-public information. Repeating publicly reported facts… is not that. Because law enforcement’s identities are not supposed to be private information, especially when they have been involved in the death, or shooting, of a civilian… But, instead of upholding the constitution, the current administration is attempting to stretch “threatening” language to cover political speech they don’t like. And let’s talk about election integrity… Polling places are legally restricted civic spaces. It is illegal to deploy federal troops, or armed federal law enforcement, to any polling place. Using that space to confront someone, over speech about federal agents, is highly inappropriate at minimum… and potentially unlawful. And this isn’t the first instance federal agents have hunted U.S. citizens down to silence calls for government accountability. Which should alarm everyone… Because a government that punishes scrutiny instead of answering it, is not a government holding its agents accountable… It’s a system telling you its agents are above it.

Jesus Freakin Congress

248,831 views • 3 months ago