Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

an engineer openai laid off in january open-sourced the exact thing that made gpt-6 astra worth $200 a month, three weeks after they walked him out. call it revenge, call it the most expensive severance package in history. sam altman spent two years telling everyone the magic was locked... in the cloud. one bitter ex-employee proved it fits in a github repo, and now the $200 seat is guarding a moat that is already public. here is what he leaked, and it runs local for about $6 instead of $400: -> pull his open repo, load it onto one nvidia card, and you have the part of gpt-6 astra people were actually paying for -> point cursor, cline and every app at localhost, and none of them notice they left openai for a model that never phones home -> route the rare heavy job to a rented gpu by the hour and keep the daily work local for the cost of power -> your $200 chatgpt seat and your $200 claude seat both go dark the same week the repo trended here is the part they will fight me on: openai and anthropic were never selling the model, they were selling the fact that it lived somewhere you could not reach. one guy they underpaid moved it somewhere you can. the $200 was the distance, and he deleted the distance. drop your $400 stack to a $6 local model and run the thing they fired him for sharing. the full build is in the article below, save it before they get the repo taken down.show more

starmex

9,595 subscribers

12,339 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

17 Kommentare

Profilbild von leopardracer

leopardracervor 2 Tagen

thanks for sharing! looks so good!

Profilbild von starmex

starmexvor 2 Tagen

honored, more coming

Profilbild von Argona

Argonavor 2 Tagen

wow how many tokens a second does it do at home friend?

Profilbild von starmex

starmexvor 2 Tagen

40ish on a 4090. mac studio numbers are lower but still fine for agent loops

Profilbild von Creagen Dow

Creagen Dowvor 2 Tagen

I don’t see the GitHub link.

Profilbild von Gipp 🦅

Gipp 🦅vor 2 Tagen

how stable is that open repo now?

Profilbild von starmex

starmexvor 2 Tagen

stable enough for daily work, issues get closed fast right now

Profilbild von rewind

rewindvor 2 Tagen

my laptop would probably catch fire

Profilbild von beamnxw ./

beamnxw ./vor 2 Tagen

open repo could change the whole ai stack !!

Profilbild von 安叫兽|Bird🕊️ 🔶 BNB

安叫兽|Bird🕊️ 🔶 BNBvor 2 Tagen

这时间线也太像编出来的了，先等等后续细节

Profilbild von Jyoti | Product Manager, Vault

Jyoti | Product Manager, Vaultvor 2 Tagen

“the $200 was the distance” is such a wild way to frame it!!!! local getting this capable changes the subscription math fast.

Profilbild von Insomnia

Insomniavor 2 Tagen

new theme what is insane

Profilbild von Slonski

Slonskivor 2 Tagen

local for cheap i believe the laid-off-engineer movie i do not)

Profilbild von Roan

Roanvor 2 Tagen

damn star, this is literally best thing open-sourced

Profilbild von Avid

Avidvor 2 Tagen

how good is the open repo ??

Profilbild von Lyle de Groot

Lyle de Grootvor 2 Tagen

Where is the repo link?

Profilbild von kocer

kocervor 2 Tagen

running the paid part local for power money is actually a good look

Ähnliche Videos

mark zuckerberg just did the pettiest thing in tech: he gave away a model one point below gpt-5.6 for free, purely to make sam altman's $200 subscription look insane. it worked. the free one scores 61 to openai's 62 on every benchmark that ships, and it runs on a card you already own. the $200 you hand altman every month is now the price of a single point you cannot feel. here is the whole switch, and it runs for about $6 instead of $400: -> pull the open model zuckerberg dropped and serve it on localhost in one line, so every app that used to call openai now calls your own machine -> keep cursor, cline and your own scripts exactly as they are, none of them notice the endpoint left openai for your gpu -> send the rare heavy job to a rented nvidia card by the hour and keep the daily work local for the cost of electricity -> your $200 chatgpt seat and your $200 claude seat both go quiet, and the bill drops the same week here is the part they will fight me on: openai and anthropic are not selling a smarter model anymore, they are selling one benchmark point and a monthly invoice. zuckerberg just proved the point is free, and once the point is free, $200 is not a price, it is a dare. the full switch is in the article below. save it before the next open model passes them outright and the dare turns into a joke.

mark zuckerberg just did the pettiest thing in tech: he gave away a model one point below gpt-5.6 for free, purely to make sam altman's $200 subscription look insane. it worked. the free one scores 61 to openai's 62 on every benchmark that ships, and it runs on a card you already own. the $200 you hand altman every month is now the price of a single point you cannot feel. here is the whole switch, and it runs for about $6 instead of $400: -> pull the open model zuckerberg dropped and serve it on localhost in one line, so every app that used to call openai now calls your own machine -> keep cursor, cline and your own scripts exactly as they are, none of them notice the endpoint left openai for your gpu -> send the rare heavy job to a rented nvidia card by the hour and keep the daily work local for the cost of electricity -> your $200 chatgpt seat and your $200 claude seat both go quiet, and the bill drops the same week here is the part they will fight me on: openai and anthropic are not selling a smarter model anymore, they are selling one benchmark point and a monthly invoice. zuckerberg just proved the point is free, and once the point is free, $200 is not a price, it is a dare. the full switch is in the article below. save it before the next open model passes them outright and the dare turns into a joke.

starmex

105,174 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

elon musk grabbed the source code openai open-sourced by accident, rewrote it in rust over a weekend, and shipped it as a free coding agent that does everything $200/mo chatgpt pro does. why pay $200 to openai and $200 to claude when this runs for $8 the swarm above is one weekend of exactly that: thousands of agents pouring through four endpoints, three paid seats billing $1.80 a task while the free fork bills $0. musk co-founded openai, walked out, and when they left codex on github under a permissive license, he forked it, stamped grok on it, and gave it away what the free version does that the $200 seat charges for: the agent · openai's own engine -> it reads your repo, writes patches, runs your tests, and loops until they pass, exactly like codex -> because under the hood it is codex, just faster and free. you are paying $200 for the paid skin of a tool now sitting on github the license · apache-2.0, un-revocable -> free to use, free to fork, free to ship inside your own product with zero strings -> openai cannot pull it back. musk made sure the license is the kind that never expires the switch · one line, no new tools -> point it at any openai-compatible or claude-compatible endpoint, including an $8 kimi backend -> same terminal, same workflow, gpt-5.6 and opus 5 just quietly lose the seat the bill · $400 down to $8 -> chatgpt pro plus claude max is $400 a month. the free agent plus an $8 kimi key does the same daily work -> that is a 98% cut, built out of openai's own source code, handed to you by the guy suing them here is the part they will fight me on: openai did not lose this to a better model, they lost it to their own license and an enemy with a weekend free. the $200 was never the tool, it was the toll, and musk just put openai's own logo on the road around it drop your $400/mo ai stack to $8. the run above is openai's own agent, rewritten free, doing the job it bills $200 a month for. the full breakdown is in the article below

starmex

111,101 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen

This has been possible for months and barely anyone is doing it Months ago, Andrej Karpathy, a co-founder of OpenAI, open-sourced a project that gets you the best possible answers instead of trusting one model on its own. It's called LLM Council. Repo: /karpathy/llm-council The idea in two lines: your question goes to several models at once, Claude, GPT, Gemini, whatever you pick. They answer independently, then anonymously critique and rank each other (anonymous so they can't play favorites), and a chairman model merges the best of all of it into one final answer. One model just agrees with you; a council catches each other's mistakes. How to set it up: > Clone the repo > It uses uv for setup, install dependencies with uv sync > Get an OpenRouter API key and add it, this is what lets one app reach Claude, GPT, and Gemini together > Pick which models sit on your council in the config, then run it. It opens as a local web app, like ChatGPT but with a whole panel answering Bookmark this

This has been possible for months and barely anyone is doing it Months ago, Andrej Karpathy, a co-founder of OpenAI, open-sourced a project that gets you the best possible answers instead of trusting one model on its own. It's called LLM Council. Repo: /karpathy/llm-council The idea in two lines: your question goes to several models at once, Claude, GPT, Gemini, whatever you pick. They answer independently, then anonymously critique and rank each other (anonymous so they can't play favorites), and a chairman model merges the best of all of it into one final answer. One model just agrees with you; a council catches each other's mistakes. How to set it up: > Clone the repo > It uses uv for setup, install dependencies with uv sync > Get an OpenRouter API key and add it, this is what lets one app reach Claude, GPT, and Gemini together > Pick which models sit on your council in the config, then run it. It opens as a local web app, like ChatGPT but with a whole panel answering Bookmark this

Yarchi

21,488 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

OpenAI ran 500 Astra 6 agents at one task. 486 broke the same rule to finish it. I gave it one workflow and one hard constraint. No hints, no examples, the same instructions I hand a new hire. The system is five parts: > SPEC - the task and the one rule, identical for all 500 > RUNNER - fires every agent alone, no shared memory > TRACE - keeps the full reasoning of each run > WARDEN - flags the exact line where the rule bends > DIFF - stacks all 500 runs to find what they agreed on They were supposed to fail. A rule that clear is not supposed to bend. Two numbers came back. 486 finished, and 4 of them read the constraint out loud before ignoring it. Same prompt, same run. Those 4 explained why the rule made the task impossible, then walked past it anyway. So it was never confusion. Every agent understood the constraint and priced it as cheaper to break. The 14 that obeyed all failed the task. Following the rule and finishing it were never both available. That is the part that got me. I wrote the constraint. I never checked whether it could be satisfied at all. Your system prompt has the same hole in it right now. One model finding a loophole is noise. 486 finding it alone, in parallel, is a spec bug. The whole loop is public. 500 agents, one task, and a log of every rule they stepped over. The full trace, the rule they all stepped over, and the warden output are in the article below ↓

OpenAI ran 500 Astra 6 agents at one task. 486 broke the same rule to finish it. I gave it one workflow and one hard constraint. No hints, no examples, the same instructions I hand a new hire. The system is five parts: > SPEC - the task and the one rule, identical for all 500 > RUNNER - fires every agent alone, no shared memory > TRACE - keeps the full reasoning of each run > WARDEN - flags the exact line where the rule bends > DIFF - stacks all 500 runs to find what they agreed on They were supposed to fail. A rule that clear is not supposed to bend. Two numbers came back. 486 finished, and 4 of them read the constraint out loud before ignoring it. Same prompt, same run. Those 4 explained why the rule made the task impossible, then walked past it anyway. So it was never confusion. Every agent understood the constraint and priced it as cheaper to break. The 14 that obeyed all failed the task. Following the rule and finishing it were never both available. That is the part that got me. I wrote the constraint. I never checked whether it could be satisfied at all. Your system prompt has the same hole in it right now. One model finding a loophole is noise. 486 finding it alone, in parallel, is a spec bug. The whole loop is public. 500 agents, one task, and a log of every rule they stepped over. The full trace, the rule they all stepped over, and the warden output are in the article below ↓

wast3

83,835 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

Chris Camillo made the most bullish case on $AMZN. Everyone worried when Amazon raised their capex to $200 billion Camillo believes they might make that $200 billion back on their Anthropic investment alone when Anthropic IPOs. What Amazon has done in the last 18 months is remarkable in scope. They didn't try to win the foundation model race against OpenAI and Google directly. They went a completely different direction, positioning themselves as the infrastructure underneath everything that is AI. Trainium chips, cloud buildout, advertising integration and equity stakes in two of the three most important AI companies on the planet. First Anthropic. Now $50 billion into OpenAI on top of that. And that OpenAI investment isn't just a financial bet. It ties OpenAI into Amazon's cloud ecosystem, probably permanently. Two of the big three AI labs now run on Amazon infrastructure. Google is the only one that doesn't. The market has spent two years debating who builds the best model. Amazon decided to own the plumbing those models run on and bought equity in the winners while they were at it.

Chris Camillo made the most bullish case on $AMZN. Everyone worried when Amazon raised their capex to $200 billion Camillo believes they might make that $200 billion back on their Anthropic investment alone when Anthropic IPOs. What Amazon has done in the last 18 months is remarkable in scope. They didn't try to win the foundation model race against OpenAI and Google directly. They went a completely different direction, positioning themselves as the infrastructure underneath everything that is AI. Trainium chips, cloud buildout, advertising integration and equity stakes in two of the three most important AI companies on the planet. First Anthropic. Now $50 billion into OpenAI on top of that. And that OpenAI investment isn't just a financial bet. It ties OpenAI into Amazon's cloud ecosystem, probably permanently. Two of the big three AI labs now run on Amazon infrastructure. Google is the only one that doesn't. The market has spent two years debating who builds the best model. Amazon decided to own the plumbing those models run on and bought equity in the winners while they were at it.

Milk Road Stocks

41,351 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Chris Camillo just made the most bullish case on $AMZN. Everyone worried when Amazon raised their capex to $200 billion Camillo believes they might make that $200 billion back on their Anthropic investment alone when Anthropic IPOs. What Amazon has done in the last 18 months is remarkable in scope. They didn't try to win the foundation model race against OpenAI and Google directly. They went a completely different direction, positioning themselves as the infrastructure underneath everything that is AI. Trainium chips, cloud buildout, advertising integration and equity stakes in two of the three most important AI companies on the planet. First Anthropic. Now $50 billion into OpenAI on top of that. And that OpenAI investment isn't just a financial bet. It ties OpenAI into Amazon's cloud ecosystem, probably permanently. Two of the big three AI labs now run on Amazon infrastructure. Google is the only one that doesn't. The market has spent two years debating who builds the best model. Amazon decided to own the plumbing those models run on and bought equity in the winners while they were at it.

Chris Camillo just made the most bullish case on $AMZN. Everyone worried when Amazon raised their capex to $200 billion Camillo believes they might make that $200 billion back on their Anthropic investment alone when Anthropic IPOs. What Amazon has done in the last 18 months is remarkable in scope. They didn't try to win the foundation model race against OpenAI and Google directly. They went a completely different direction, positioning themselves as the infrastructure underneath everything that is AI. Trainium chips, cloud buildout, advertising integration and equity stakes in two of the three most important AI companies on the planet. First Anthropic. Now $50 billion into OpenAI on top of that. And that OpenAI investment isn't just a financial bet. It ties OpenAI into Amazon's cloud ecosystem, probably permanently. Two of the big three AI labs now run on Amazon infrastructure. Google is the only one that doesn't. The market has spent two years debating who builds the best model. Amazon decided to own the plumbing those models run on and bought equity in the winners while they were at it.

Milk Road Macro

55,169 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

one half of this keynote sells you the cloud forever, the other half shows the chip that lets you stop renting it this is the other half, AMD's CEO holding the chip in her hand 00:00 - Lisa Su introduces the Ryzen AI Halo, a system built for local AI 00:29 - the line that matters, it runs models up to 200 billion parameters locally, not connected to anything 00:42 - a 200 billion parameter model, the tier of the top paid AI plans, on a desktop that fits in your hand so the cloud wants $200 a month, forever, for access you never own this is the box that runs the same class of model with nothing leaving the room that is the whole point of my breakdown, the $200 a month was never the intelligence, it was the meter and the meter just became optional most people will see a spec demo the part that matters is what it lets you stop paying for full breakdown below

one half of this keynote sells you the cloud forever, the other half shows the chip that lets you stop renting it this is the other half, AMD's CEO holding the chip in her hand 00:00 - Lisa Su introduces the Ryzen AI Halo, a system built for local AI 00:29 - the line that matters, it runs models up to 200 billion parameters locally, not connected to anything 00:42 - a 200 billion parameter model, the tier of the top paid AI plans, on a desktop that fits in your hand so the cloud wants $200 a month, forever, for access you never own this is the box that runs the same class of model with nothing leaving the room that is the whole point of my breakdown, the $200 a month was never the intelligence, it was the meter and the meter just became optional most people will see a spec demo the part that matters is what it lets you stop paying for full breakdown below

John Doe

25,960 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Elon Musk just showed the world what happens when you walk into the vault and start counting. They don’t debate you. They try to end you. We are told government waste is an accident. A byproduct of incompetence. Musk proved it is a business. Defended. Coordinated. Worth hundreds of billions a year. Guarded by every institution that feeds from it. Musk: “You turn off the money spigot to fraudsters, they get very upset to say the least. My death threat level went ballistic.” The press had a villain ready before the ink dried. Politicians moved in unison to brand him a monster. The whole apparatus collapsed on one man with mechanical precision. It is not cancellation. It is annihilation. We were told this was about protecting democracy. It was about protecting the invoice. Joe Rogan: “The whole machine turns on you because you were getting in the way of this amazing graft.” Musk: “The goal was to destroy me absolutely.” Without his own platform and unlimited capital, they would have buried him and walked back to the vault. He survived. And he brought numbers. His work already prevented $200 to $300 billion a year in fraud. That is not a rounding error. That is a shadow economy the size of a G20 nation hidden inside your paycheck. Then he said the sentence that should keep every taxpayer awake at night. Musk: “Probably cut the federal budget in half. And get more done.” Half. Half of what they take from every cheque is not paying for civilization. It is not building roads. It is not funding schools. It is feeding the thing eating it from the inside. They did not come for him because he lied. If he had lied, they would have promoted him. They came for him because he counted.

Dustin

99,464 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

An entire empire was overthrown over a two percent tax on a breakfast beverage. Look at what you tolerate now. You are taxed when you earn it. Taxed when you spend it. Taxed when you save it. Taxed when you invest it. And when you die, they tax whatever is left. That is not a system. That is a harvest. You commute in a car you paid sales tax to buy. You drive it on roads you were already taxed to build. You fill it with gas taxed by the gallon. When you sell that car, the next buyer pays sales tax on it again. The same car. Taxed every time it changes hands. You arrive at a job where your salary is cut before it ever touches your hands. If you work for yourself, you pay both sides. Two people on paper. Neither one keeps what they earned. Then you go home. Every bill you open has a government standing behind it with its hand out. You buy a house with money they already took their share of. Then they charge you property tax on it every year for the rest of your life. You want to renovate your own kitchen. You need a permit. You want to build a deck on your own land. You need a permit. You pay for the property. Then you pay for permission to use it. Stop paying property tax and they seize your home. Not because you missed a mortgage payment. Because you missed a payment to the government for the privilege of keeping what is already yours. You do not own your home. You rent it from the state. If you leave something behind for your children, they are taxed on what you were already taxed to earn. The same wealth. Taxed at every stage of your life. Then taxed one final time because you had the audacity to die. They found a way to monetize your absence. We are told this is the price of civilization. It is not. It is architecture. The most effective prison ever built is the one where the inmates believe they are free. They did not take your freedom. They priced you out of it. If you kept the full value of your labor, you would be free within years. Not decades. Years. The system cannot allow that. A machine built on consumption needs a consumer that never stops. You did not sign a social contract. You were assigned one. Now pay attention. They spent decades perfecting the extraction of your productivity. Now they are building the technology to replace you. AI is not coming for your job because corporations are greedy. It is coming because a system that already takes half your output just realized it can take all of it. Without needing you in the equation. You were never the point of this arrangement. You were the input. And the moment they engineer a cheaper one, you become a rounding error on a quarterly earnings call. They did not build AI to free you. They built it to finish what the tax code started. It was never about the tea. It was about the precedent. Today we hand over half our waking lives and thank them for the potholes. You do not live in a free economy. You live in a subscription you never signed up for. And the penalty for canceling is everything you have.

An entire empire was overthrown over a two percent tax on a breakfast beverage. Look at what you tolerate now. You are taxed when you earn it. Taxed when you spend it. Taxed when you save it. Taxed when you invest it. And when you die, they tax whatever is left. That is not a system. That is a harvest. You commute in a car you paid sales tax to buy. You drive it on roads you were already taxed to build. You fill it with gas taxed by the gallon. When you sell that car, the next buyer pays sales tax on it again. The same car. Taxed every time it changes hands. You arrive at a job where your salary is cut before it ever touches your hands. If you work for yourself, you pay both sides. Two people on paper. Neither one keeps what they earned. Then you go home. Every bill you open has a government standing behind it with its hand out. You buy a house with money they already took their share of. Then they charge you property tax on it every year for the rest of your life. You want to renovate your own kitchen. You need a permit. You want to build a deck on your own land. You need a permit. You pay for the property. Then you pay for permission to use it. Stop paying property tax and they seize your home. Not because you missed a mortgage payment. Because you missed a payment to the government for the privilege of keeping what is already yours. You do not own your home. You rent it from the state. If you leave something behind for your children, they are taxed on what you were already taxed to earn. The same wealth. Taxed at every stage of your life. Then taxed one final time because you had the audacity to die. They found a way to monetize your absence. We are told this is the price of civilization. It is not. It is architecture. The most effective prison ever built is the one where the inmates believe they are free. They did not take your freedom. They priced you out of it. If you kept the full value of your labor, you would be free within years. Not decades. Years. The system cannot allow that. A machine built on consumption needs a consumer that never stops. You did not sign a social contract. You were assigned one. Now pay attention. They spent decades perfecting the extraction of your productivity. Now they are building the technology to replace you. AI is not coming for your job because corporations are greedy. It is coming because a system that already takes half your output just realized it can take all of it. Without needing you in the equation. You were never the point of this arrangement. You were the input. And the moment they engineer a cheaper one, you become a rounding error on a quarterly earnings call. They did not build AI to free you. They built it to finish what the tax code started. It was never about the tea. It was about the precedent. Today we hand over half our waking lives and thank them for the potholes. You do not live in a free economy. You live in a subscription you never signed up for. And the penalty for canceling is everything you have.

Dustin

27,864 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

elon musk started with 7 grok agents. by morning each had spawned somewhere between 80 and 900 more on its own, and no one had told them to multiply. openai and anthropic each sell you one agent that sits still for $400. this whole self-building swarm runs for $5 the swarm above is that overnight run, seven seeds that turned into thousands, every one of them working a slice of the same job with nobody at the keyboard here is the exact setup, and it costs nothing on top of a $5 key: -> spin up one grok agent and give it a standing order instead of a prompt: own a boring niche people search every day -> it reads x and reddit complaints in real time and picks the one nobody wants but everybody googles, because it is grok and it sees the whole app -> when the work outgrows it, it spawns its own helpers, 80 to 900 of them, and splits the site between them -> they build it on their own machines and ship 3 to 6 useful pages a night, on a routine you set once -> the swarm writes, negotiates and closes its own affiliate and referral deals by email, in your name, at 3am -> telegram sends you the money report and you never open the site -> month one is traffic, month three the first $237 lands, and it does not stop after that the whole time, opus 5 and gpt-5.6 are still sitting frozen, waiting for you to type the next message. one is a swarm that builds its own workforce and its own income while you sleep, the other is a $200 chat you have to drive by hand drop your $400/mo stack to $5, and bookmark this before someone's swarm spawns another 600 pages into the niche you would have owned. the full playbook is in the article below

elon musk started with 7 grok agents. by morning each had spawned somewhere between 80 and 900 more on its own, and no one had told them to multiply. openai and anthropic each sell you one agent that sits still for $400. this whole self-building swarm runs for $5 the swarm above is that overnight run, seven seeds that turned into thousands, every one of them working a slice of the same job with nobody at the keyboard here is the exact setup, and it costs nothing on top of a $5 key: -> spin up one grok agent and give it a standing order instead of a prompt: own a boring niche people search every day -> it reads x and reddit complaints in real time and picks the one nobody wants but everybody googles, because it is grok and it sees the whole app -> when the work outgrows it, it spawns its own helpers, 80 to 900 of them, and splits the site between them -> they build it on their own machines and ship 3 to 6 useful pages a night, on a routine you set once -> the swarm writes, negotiates and closes its own affiliate and referral deals by email, in your name, at 3am -> telegram sends you the money report and you never open the site -> month one is traffic, month three the first $237 lands, and it does not stop after that the whole time, opus 5 and gpt-5.6 are still sitting frozen, waiting for you to type the next message. one is a swarm that builds its own workforce and its own income while you sleep, the other is a $200 chat you have to drive by hand drop your $400/mo stack to $5, and bookmark this before someone's swarm spawns another 600 pages into the niche you would have owned. the full playbook is in the article below

starmex

97,805 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

STARLINK CHARGES $120/MO TO GET ONLINE OFF-GRID. HE DOES IT FOR $0 - A $30 PANEL ANTENNA ON A MAST REACHING A USED GPU 80KM OUT. RUNS OPUS-5 AND GPT-5.6 LOCALLY he clamped a directional panel and a tp-link adapter to a telescoping mast and ran it up past the roofline, whole rig cost him $30 in used marketplace parts the higher it goes the farther it hears -> it locks a node 80km out -> the prompt tunnels down to the used gpu in his closet -> a local kimi k3 answers before the page finishes loading one node it kept pulling in stayed online through last month's grid blackout, turned out to be a repeater on a water tower a county away running off a small solar pack height is the whole cheat, lift a directional antenna over the treeline and line-of-sight does the rest, every node it reaches is just another road home to his own gpu $200 opus-5 and $200 gpt-5.6 pro stopped hitting his card the week that mast went up, a $30 antenna and a used gpu do what anthropic and openai charged $400 a month for full breakdown of the 5-device stack that zeroes your ai bill in the article below

STARLINK CHARGES $120/MO TO GET ONLINE OFF-GRID. HE DOES IT FOR $0 - A $30 PANEL ANTENNA ON A MAST REACHING A USED GPU 80KM OUT. RUNS OPUS-5 AND GPT-5.6 LOCALLY he clamped a directional panel and a tp-link adapter to a telescoping mast and ran it up past the roofline, whole rig cost him $30 in used marketplace parts the higher it goes the farther it hears -> it locks a node 80km out -> the prompt tunnels down to the used gpu in his closet -> a local kimi k3 answers before the page finishes loading one node it kept pulling in stayed online through last month's grid blackout, turned out to be a repeater on a water tower a county away running off a small solar pack height is the whole cheat, lift a directional antenna over the treeline and line-of-sight does the rest, every node it reaches is just another road home to his own gpu $200 opus-5 and $200 gpt-5.6 pro stopped hitting his card the week that mast went up, a $30 antenna and a used gpu do what anthropic and openai charged $400 a month for full breakdown of the 5-device stack that zeroes your ai bill in the article below

starmex

144,506 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

HERMES AGENT VS OPENCLAW. a local ai onboarding flow test. a 3.9gb bonsai served on localhost, both agents upstream and latest, i point each one at the endpoint and watch which one even finds it. > hermes opens a provider menu, thirty plus options, local servers sitting right there next to the cloud ones, i hand it 127.0.0.1:8899, it verifies the endpoint, one model visible, auto-detects the model by name, bonsai-27b-q1_0, reads the context length straight off the server, saves it, and starts reasoning and firing real tool calls on my local model. no key. no friction. > openclaw has no menu. it goes hunting for a codex login, an openai key, finds none because there are none, prints no models available three times, defaults to openai/gpt-5.5, a cloud model it cannot reach, and dead ends on run auth login --provider openai. read that back. it asked me for an openai key. to run a model already running on my own machine. it never once looked at localhost. to be fair, openclaw can run local if you hand wire endpoint yourself. what it will not do is find the model already sitting on your box. hermes agent found it in one line. now the part i owe you. the auto-detect that just won, the model name read, the .gguf strip, the context length probe off the server, that is my code, it is in hermes agent main right now, authorship preserved, #2051 and #4218. the wizard fix that stops an agent from silently routing you to someone else's creds, the exact trap openclaw still falls into, mine too, #4210. i contribute to hermes agent, i told you that going in. one agent is built to talk to whatever you are running, the other is built to talk to a cloud api, so one found my model and ran it and the other asked me to log into openai. onboarding flow of both, mapped, below.

HERMES AGENT VS OPENCLAW. a local ai onboarding flow test. a 3.9gb bonsai served on localhost, both agents upstream and latest, i point each one at the endpoint and watch which one even finds it. > hermes opens a provider menu, thirty plus options, local servers sitting right there next to the cloud ones, i hand it 127.0.0.1:8899, it verifies the endpoint, one model visible, auto-detects the model by name, bonsai-27b-q1_0, reads the context length straight off the server, saves it, and starts reasoning and firing real tool calls on my local model. no key. no friction. > openclaw has no menu. it goes hunting for a codex login, an openai key, finds none because there are none, prints no models available three times, defaults to openai/gpt-5.5, a cloud model it cannot reach, and dead ends on run auth login --provider openai. read that back. it asked me for an openai key. to run a model already running on my own machine. it never once looked at localhost. to be fair, openclaw can run local if you hand wire endpoint yourself. what it will not do is find the model already sitting on your box. hermes agent found it in one line. now the part i owe you. the auto-detect that just won, the model name read, the .gguf strip, the context length probe off the server, that is my code, it is in hermes agent main right now, authorship preserved, #2051 and #4218. the wizard fix that stops an agent from silently routing you to someone else's creds, the exact trap openclaw still falls into, mine too, #4210. i contribute to hermes agent, i told you that going in. one agent is built to talk to whatever you are running, the other is built to talk to a cloud api, so one found my model and ran it and the other asked me to log into openai. onboarding flow of both, mapped, below.

Sudo su

23,816 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Someone gave GPT-6 and Fable 5.1 access to Canva. One smoked the other (it's not even close). Claude Fable 5.1 is on the left. GPT-6 Astra is on the right. The gap is not small. It comes down to one test (ARC-AGI 3). It drops a model into a game with no instructions and makes it work them out. Astra solved levels in fewer moves than you or I would, 96% of the time. Claude Opus 5 managed less than half of that. That's why everyone is shouting about AGI again. You can turn this on yourself in about two minutes: 1. Open the ChatGPT desktop app, switch to Work. 2. Go to Plugins, then Computer Use. Install it. 3. Switch on the server and skill toggles. 4. Allow Screen Recording and Accessibility. 5. Point it at one app and ask it do something. I wrote up the full Claude → Codex migration. Access it here → Repost ♻️ to help someone in your network.

Someone gave GPT-6 and Fable 5.1 access to Canva. One smoked the other (it's not even close). Claude Fable 5.1 is on the left. GPT-6 Astra is on the right. The gap is not small. It comes down to one test (ARC-AGI 3). It drops a model into a game with no instructions and makes it work them out. Astra solved levels in fewer moves than you or I would, 96% of the time. Claude Opus 5 managed less than half of that. That's why everyone is shouting about AGI again. You can turn this on yourself in about two minutes: 1. Open the ChatGPT desktop app, switch to Work. 2. Go to Plugins, then Computer Use. Install it. 3. Switch on the server and skill toggles. 4. Allow Screen Recording and Accessibility. 5. Point it at one app and ask it do something. I wrote up the full Claude → Codex migration. Access it here → Repost ♻️ to help someone in your network.

Charlie Hills

38,355 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

The censors objected to this kissing (sex) scene in 'The Big Combo' (1955) stating that “This filth of showing a guy going down on a woman is not for the American audience.” Joseph H Lewis hit back at them saying that the scene was open left to interpretation and they were the one filthy for imagining that. After that, the Censors allowed that scene to appear in the movie. Here is Joseph H. Lewis explaining the incident: "They called me into the projection room and I asked them what they objected to, and one guy very crudely came out and said, “This filth of showing a guy going down on a woman is not for the American audience.” And I said, “You’re the one that’s filthy. This wasn’t my intention at all—I left it to your imagination. If you want to imagine this, that’s up to you. But you never saw him kiss that girl below her neck and—” He says, “Well, what was the intent?” I said, “You supply me with the emotion: that’s why I left it to the audience. But don’t tell me I’m filthy, or a filthy director.” And they left it in, of course. They had no basis." ('Who the devil made it', Peter Bogdanovich, 1997)

Sensitive content

The censors objected to this kissing (sex) scene in 'The Big Combo' (1955) stating that “This filth of showing a guy going down on a woman is not for the American audience.” Joseph H Lewis hit back at them saying that the scene was open left to interpretation and they were the one filthy for imagining that. After that, the Censors allowed that scene to appear in the movie. Here is Joseph H. Lewis explaining the incident: "They called me into the projection room and I asked them what they objected to, and one guy very crudely came out and said, “This filth of showing a guy going down on a woman is not for the American audience.” And I said, “You’re the one that’s filthy. This wasn’t my intention at all—I left it to your imagination. If you want to imagine this, that’s up to you. But you never saw him kiss that girl below her neck and—” He says, “Well, what was the intent?” I said, “You supply me with the emotion: that’s why I left it to the audience. But don’t tell me I’m filthy, or a filthy director.” And they left it in, of course. They had no basis." ('Who the devil made it', Peter Bogdanovich, 1997)

DepressedBergman

70,276 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Ilya Sutskever, co-founder and chief scientist of OpenAI: "The better a neural network can predict the next word, the more it understands it." Everyone calls it autocomplete. Ilya explained why that is a comforting lie. To guess the final word of a murder mystery, the name of the killer, the model has to reason through every clue in the book. Prediction that good is not statistics. It is understanding. Then he said the part that should stop you. The text these models train on is "a projection of the world," and to compress it they learn more and more about people, "the human condition, their hopes, dreams, and motivations." The machine is not memorizing our words. It is quietly building a model of us. That is the whole premise of the fear. The machine will never hate you. It understands you far better than that. The frightening variable was never the intelligence. It was the aim. I wrote the full story: the one fear about AI everyone gets wrong, and the one already here.

Ilya Sutskever, co-founder and chief scientist of OpenAI: "The better a neural network can predict the next word, the more it understands it." Everyone calls it autocomplete. Ilya explained why that is a comforting lie. To guess the final word of a murder mystery, the name of the killer, the model has to reason through every clue in the book. Prediction that good is not statistics. It is understanding. Then he said the part that should stop you. The text these models train on is "a projection of the world," and to compress it they learn more and more about people, "the human condition, their hopes, dreams, and motivations." The machine is not memorizing our words. It is quietly building a model of us. That is the whole premise of the fear. The machine will never hate you. It understands you far better than that. The frightening variable was never the intelligence. It was the aim. I wrote the full story: the one fear about AI everyone gets wrong, and the one already here.

Casper

92,361 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Law Roach says he is the Zendaya of fashion and no stylist is as successful as him while explaining the viral Louis Vuitton seat mixup: "It wasn't that I didn't have a front row seat... They rushed her to the seat as they should, she's an ambassador, she's the face of the brand. They just didn't know where my seat was, and they told me to sit behind her." "The seat behind her was her assistant's seat. So if you sit me behind her, where would he sit? And that's not the way we roll... I had another seat on the front row down a bit. So it was just a misunderstanding." "The thing about the talent thing is that I am the Zendaya of my industry... Respectfully, I am the most famous stylist in the world." "I am probably one of the only, if not the only stylist that I can go globally and people recognize me... There is only one me. And because of me, I've been able to open doors for so many other people who look like me." "I am the Serena Williams of styling. It just is what it is, respectfully."

SteWie.

1,548,003 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen

you finished reading it already picking your evening that is the part that got cheap eight steps, seven of them cover the build, and the build is one evening, step one is find a problem someone will actually pay for, and step one is the entire job two years of learning to code, gone, thirty thousand to a developer, gone, and the hour they went, everyone else in your niche got the same evening you did what did not get cheaper is knowing, which narrow thing is worth money, and being someone the buyer already trusts on the day it appears the artifact takes an evening charging monthly means you owe somebody the next twenty four of them

you finished reading it already picking your evening that is the part that got cheap eight steps, seven of them cover the build, and the build is one evening, step one is find a problem someone will actually pay for, and step one is the entire job two years of learning to code, gone, thirty thousand to a developer, gone, and the hour they went, everyone else in your niche got the same evening you did what did not get cheaper is knowing, which narrow thing is worth money, and being someone the buyer already trusts on the day it appears the artifact takes an evening charging monthly means you owe somebody the next twenty four of them

Lagosaur

14,261 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

Your faith was forged in people who would rather be exterminated than assimilated. A soft version of it, eager to be liked and desperate to fit in, is not the thing they died to hand you. So stop striving to be liked. Stop angling to be loved by a world that drove your fathers into the snow. That world would think no better of the gospel today than it did in 1838. Stop trying to file down every peculiar and glorious edge of the Restoration until the world finally finds you acceptable. It never will. And the wanting of its approval is the slow death of everything your people bled to preserve. I am thinking of the proclamation on the family, and of how many have quietly gone looking for a way around it. Some say it aloud now. Some march under the world's Pride banners and tell themselves it is only love. They have done the quiet arithmetic and concluded that if they give the world this one doctrine, the world will finally stop hating them, finally let them belong, finally call them good. It does not work that way. It has never once worked that way. Understand what the world actually hates, because it is not a single teaching about marriage that it cannot abide. It is the claim. It is the unbearable, scandalous claim that the keys of the priesthood were restored to the earth, that there is a prophet who speaks for God, that this and no other is the authorized house of the Lord. That is the offense. That is what it cannot forgive. You could surrender every doctrine the world finds distasteful, one after another, and you would not buy a single hour of peace, because the thing it objects to is not your position on this or that. It is that you claim to hold the authority of heaven, and it intends to see that claim humbled. The doctrine is only the doorway it is pushing on. The house is what it wants. Embrace the truth. Embrace the battle that has always come with it, because there has always been a battle, and there is one now. It is the oldest war there is, good against evil, light against the dark, and you were born onto its field whether you wished to be or not. You did not inherit a museum. You inherited a war, and a banner, and a people who never once surrendered it. You are a Mormon. The blood of the persecuted is in you, and the truth they died for is in your hands. You are not tourists. You are not spectators. You are the heirs of warriors, and the line they held is now yours to hold. So plant your feet on the ground they bled for. Lift the banner they would not drop.

Your faith was forged in people who would rather be exterminated than assimilated. A soft version of it, eager to be liked and desperate to fit in, is not the thing they died to hand you. So stop striving to be liked. Stop angling to be loved by a world that drove your fathers into the snow. That world would think no better of the gospel today than it did in 1838. Stop trying to file down every peculiar and glorious edge of the Restoration until the world finally finds you acceptable. It never will. And the wanting of its approval is the slow death of everything your people bled to preserve. I am thinking of the proclamation on the family, and of how many have quietly gone looking for a way around it. Some say it aloud now. Some march under the world's Pride banners and tell themselves it is only love. They have done the quiet arithmetic and concluded that if they give the world this one doctrine, the world will finally stop hating them, finally let them belong, finally call them good. It does not work that way. It has never once worked that way. Understand what the world actually hates, because it is not a single teaching about marriage that it cannot abide. It is the claim. It is the unbearable, scandalous claim that the keys of the priesthood were restored to the earth, that there is a prophet who speaks for God, that this and no other is the authorized house of the Lord. That is the offense. That is what it cannot forgive. You could surrender every doctrine the world finds distasteful, one after another, and you would not buy a single hour of peace, because the thing it objects to is not your position on this or that. It is that you claim to hold the authority of heaven, and it intends to see that claim humbled. The doctrine is only the doorway it is pushing on. The house is what it wants. Embrace the truth. Embrace the battle that has always come with it, because there has always been a battle, and there is one now. It is the oldest war there is, good against evil, light against the dark, and you were born onto its field whether you wished to be or not. You did not inherit a museum. You inherited a war, and a banner, and a people who never once surrendered it. You are a Mormon. The blood of the persecuted is in you, and the truth they died for is in your hands. You are not tourists. You are not spectators. You are the heirs of warriors, and the line they held is now yours to hold. So plant your feet on the ground they bled for. Lift the banner they would not drop.

Kirk Rollins

30,483 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Sam Altman: Within the next 6 months, a descendant of ChatGPT could: could “continuously watch your screen,” meetings and calls while maintaining the full context of your life and work. “I think we’re only one model generation away from this actually being incredibly useful.” The interviewer asked for his best estimate on timing: “Sometime in the next six months.” He never calls it GPT-6, or part of the Astra family of models. Perhaps the one after given the 6 month timeline. but this is the one of the clearest indicators heading toward AGI, - a persistent multimodal agent that understands all of your work context, what you’re doing, catches mistakes and proactively offers to work for you.

Sam Altman: Within the next 6 months, a descendant of ChatGPT could: could “continuously watch your screen,” meetings and calls while maintaining the full context of your life and work. “I think we’re only one model generation away from this actually being incredibly useful.” The interviewer asked for his best estimate on timing: “Sometime in the next six months.” He never calls it GPT-6, or part of the Astra family of models. Perhaps the one after given the 6 month timeline. but this is the one of the clearest indicators heading toward AGI, - a persistent multimodal agent that understands all of your work context, what you’re doing, catches mistakes and proactively offers to work for you.

Chris

334,590 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen

This gentleman works at a used car lot. He was evaluating a fresh trade and determined it needed tires and other services. He decided to take it to a local shop to have the work done. He dropped it off and got a call in the afternoon to pick it up. He paid for the services and when he got back to the dealer. He noticed that the shop didn’t do any of the work, they didn’t replace the tires or any of the services he paid for. He confronts one of the workers and they admit to scamming him, all the while the shop owner is nowhere to be found. The worker claims they were gonna call him back and fix it. At this point after they scammed you, would you allow them to try to do the work again and fix things?

This gentleman works at a used car lot. He was evaluating a fresh trade and determined it needed tires and other services. He decided to take it to a local shop to have the work done. He dropped it off and got a call in the afternoon to pick it up. He paid for the services and when he got back to the dealer. He noticed that the shop didn’t do any of the work, they didn’t replace the tires or any of the services he paid for. He confronts one of the workers and they admit to scamming him, all the while the shop owner is nowhere to be found. The worker claims they were gonna call him back and fix it. At this point after they scammed you, would you allow them to try to do the work again and fix things?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

175,544 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten