正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

An exasperated Dr Chris Shoemaker breaks down why the Nakahara study should have been the final nail in the coffin. The study surprisingly showed nearly all of the vaccinated hearts working 46% harder for at least 6 months after the shot. ‘As a cardiologist you would be apoplectic if... show more

Kat A 🌸

72,246 subscribers

119,934 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

健康养生新闻政治科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 条评论

Kat A 🌸 的头像

Kat A 🌸1 年前

The Ladapo study

Kat A 🌸 的头像

Kat A 🌸1 年前

The Nakahara study 👇

Liz Churchill 的头像

Liz Churchill1 年前

Horrific.

Kat A 🌸 的头像

Kat A 🌸1 年前

Yep

Helen D. Riley 的头像

Helen D. Riley1 年前

The fact, alone, that the heart is forced to work significantly harder in those who take the shot should be sufficient to pull it off the market. This video clip of Dr. Shoemaker explaining such should be played for the President to see. Is this what he wants for Americans?💔🇺🇸🇺🇸

Kat A 🌸 的头像

Kat A 🌸1 年前

Yes it is so easy to understand

Joe Turco 的头像

Joe Turco1 年前

Well then, it appears that the mRNA jabs are working according to plan!

Kat A 🌸 的头像

Kat A 🌸1 年前

It would appear so 🙄

Jim Land 的头像

Jim Land1 年前

They are clearly trying to kill or maim. Many prime athletes are collapsing on the field, unlike anything I've seen before 2021. If the CDC studied this, could open a can of worms, as is the case where they conveniently sweep this under the rug for autism in relation to the jab.

Kat A 🌸 的头像

Kat A 🌸1 年前

It’s hard not to see it as intentional at this point

相关视频

It took Canadian Dr Chris Shoemaker two years to fully realise the truth. Now he believes many more doctors are awake but afraid to speak out. What we have is a non vaccine that increases the disease it was meant to prevent and reduces immunity to other ailments. In particular he refers to the surprising data from the Nakahara study which showed nearly all of the vaccinated hearts were working 46% harder for at least six months post shot. ‘As a cardiologist you would be apoplectic if a heart was working 15% harder.’ This should have been the final nail in the coffin!! Interview : Cafe Locked Out

It took Canadian Dr Chris Shoemaker two years to fully realise the truth. Now he believes many more doctors are awake but afraid to speak out. What we have is a non vaccine that increases the disease it was meant to prevent and reduces immunity to other ailments. In particular he refers to the surprising data from the Nakahara study which showed nearly all of the vaccinated hearts were working 46% harder for at least six months post shot. ‘As a cardiologist you would be apoplectic if a heart was working 15% harder.’ This should have been the final nail in the coffin!! Interview : Cafe Locked Out

Kat A 🌸

252,781 次观看 • 2 年前

1/3 Nakahara Study Shows "Vaxed" Heart Works 46% Harder‼️ Dr. Chris Shoemaker on a Zoom type call highlights the importance of the Nakahara study‼️ "The study was on 1000 patients getting pet scans for a variety of health reasons, 2/3 "vaxed" and 1/3 "unvaxed"‼️🙏👇

1/3 Nakahara Study Shows "Vaxed" Heart Works 46% Harder‼️ Dr. Chris Shoemaker on a Zoom type call highlights the importance of the Nakahara study‼️ "The study was on 1000 patients getting pet scans for a variety of health reasons, 2/3 "vaxed" and 1/3 "unvaxed"‼️🙏👇

Sophia Dahl

84,389 次观看 • 2 年前

Professor Clancy: “The increase in mortality.... peaks [about] three or four months after being vaccinated” A stunning 21 Million person Japanese study A potential blueprint for Excess Mortality This Study out of Japan highlights a massive flaw in the recent French study out of JAMA. French scientists showed a mortality BENEFIT from vaccination.... but they ignore deaths happening for 6 months after vaccination... and did NOT provide any raw data. Prof. Dr. Martin Haditsch: “The trick was.. they started to count the deaths in the vaccinated, only 6 months after they got the shot.” Link that to what Professor Robert Clancy says of the 21 million person Japanese study: "The increase in mortality.... peaks three or four months after being vaccinated.... by five or 6 months, it's back down to the nonvaccinated number of individuals.”

Professor Clancy: “The increase in mortality.... peaks [about] three or four months after being vaccinated” A stunning 21 Million person Japanese study A potential blueprint for Excess Mortality This Study out of Japan highlights a massive flaw in the recent French study out of JAMA. French scientists showed a mortality BENEFIT from vaccination.... but they ignore deaths happening for 6 months after vaccination... and did NOT provide any raw data. Prof. Dr. Martin Haditsch: “The trick was.. they started to count the deaths in the vaccinated, only 6 months after they got the shot.” Link that to what Professor Robert Clancy says of the 21 million person Japanese study: "The increase in mortality.... peaks three or four months after being vaccinated.... by five or 6 months, it's back down to the nonvaccinated number of individuals.”

Humanspective

46,197 次观看 • 2 个月前

🧵THREAD: “We’re seeing a disturbing continued trend of cardiac arrests in people who have taken the vaccine,” reported world-renowned cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough Friday. “Now we have data from Nakahara in a human cardiac PET study showing that positron emission tomography scans of the heart change in almost everybody who took the shot, at least for six months or longer, where the heart’s metabolism changes.” (Continue reading in the thread below)

🧵THREAD: “We’re seeing a disturbing continued trend of cardiac arrests in people who have taken the vaccine,” reported world-renowned cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough Friday. “Now we have data from Nakahara in a human cardiac PET study showing that positron emission tomography scans of the heart change in almost everybody who took the shot, at least for six months or longer, where the heart’s metabolism changes.” (Continue reading in the thread below)

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,396,178 次观看 • 2 年前

Dr. Peter McCullough: HALT All mRNA Vaccines Several studies have recently come out, showing alarming findings from the COVID-19 mRNA injections: • A study from Schreckenberg demonstrated that mRNA from Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are directly toxic to heart muscle cells (cardiomyocytes). • A study from Krausen revealed the presence of vaccine mRNA in the heart tissue of people who died after receiving the vaccine. • In contrast to what authorities told us, a study from Castruita showed that vaccine mRNA circulates in the bloodstream for at least a month and remains in lymph nodes around the injection site for at least a couple of months. Even more frightening, this mRNA technology is coming soon to flu and RSV shots, turning an ineffective but generally safe flu shot into a dangerous shot, says Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®. "There should be a ban on all messenger development at this point in time, given the COVID-19 vaccine debacle."

Dr. Peter McCullough: HALT All mRNA Vaccines Several studies have recently come out, showing alarming findings from the COVID-19 mRNA injections: • A study from Schreckenberg demonstrated that mRNA from Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are directly toxic to heart muscle cells (cardiomyocytes). • A study from Krausen revealed the presence of vaccine mRNA in the heart tissue of people who died after receiving the vaccine. • In contrast to what authorities told us, a study from Castruita showed that vaccine mRNA circulates in the bloodstream for at least a month and remains in lymph nodes around the injection site for at least a couple of months. Even more frightening, this mRNA technology is coming soon to flu and RSV shots, turning an ineffective but generally safe flu shot into a dangerous shot, says Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®. "There should be a ban on all messenger development at this point in time, given the COVID-19 vaccine debacle."

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

718,313 次观看 • 2 年前

6 out of 18 glioblastoma (brain cancer) patients maintained a low GKI for 6+ months. All 6 lived at least 33 months. At the time the study was published, 1 of them was still alive 84 months after diagnosis. Of the 12 who did not maintain a low GKI, just 1 lived more than 30 months. Read the full study: Watch an excerpt from the full interview:

6 out of 18 glioblastoma (brain cancer) patients maintained a low GKI for 6+ months. All 6 lived at least 33 months. At the time the study was published, 1 of them was still alive 84 months after diagnosis. Of the 12 who did not maintain a low GKI, just 1 lived more than 30 months. Read the full study: Watch an excerpt from the full interview:

Thomas N. Seyfried

51,737 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 New Cedars Sinai Study Finds Heart Attack Deaths Are Up Nearly 30% in People Ages 25 to 44 "A national study from Cedars Sinai hospital shows the deaths related to heart attacks increased across every age group since the spring of 2020 but the group that saw the biggest increase isn't who you might think...The relative increase in heart attack associated deaths among 25-44 year olds was a staggering 30%...Experts are still working to figure out why young people are so impacted."

🚨 New Cedars Sinai Study Finds Heart Attack Deaths Are Up Nearly 30% in People Ages 25 to 44 "A national study from Cedars Sinai hospital shows the deaths related to heart attacks increased across every age group since the spring of 2020 but the group that saw the biggest increase isn't who you might think...The relative increase in heart attack associated deaths among 25-44 year olds was a staggering 30%...Experts are still working to figure out why young people are so impacted."

Chief Nerd

648,431 次观看 • 2 年前

“An Inconvenient Study” asks a simple question: Are vaccinated children healthier, or less healthy? The data was clear.. higher rates of asthma, developmental delays, learning issues, and speech disorders among the vaccinated group. And yet, the study was never published. When there’s a signal this strong, you follow it. You study it. You don’t ignore it. That’s the heart of the work I do, because where there’s risk, there must be choice. Watch An Inconvenient Study free at Full interview available at Dr. Drew

“An Inconvenient Study” asks a simple question: Are vaccinated children healthier, or less healthy? The data was clear.. higher rates of asthma, developmental delays, learning issues, and speech disorders among the vaccinated group. And yet, the study was never published. When there’s a signal this strong, you follow it. You study it. You don’t ignore it. That’s the heart of the work I do, because where there’s risk, there must be choice. Watch An Inconvenient Study free at Full interview available at Dr. Drew

Del Bigtree

400,525 次观看 • 7 个月前

The Most Important Vaccine Safety Study Ever Suppressed. Henry Ford Vaxxed vs. Unvaxxed Study: Vaccinated Kids Had 453% More Neurodevelopmental Disorders. Unvaccinated children had ZERO cases of brain dysfunction, ADHD, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities or tics. Soon To Be Released..."Impact of Childhood Vaccination on Short- and Long-Term Chronic Health Outcomes in Children: A Birth Cohort Study" ICAN lead counsel Aaron Siri, Esq. revealed the results of an unpublished study from Michigan’s Henry Ford Health System. The study was done by infectious disease physician, Dr Marcus Zervos, MD. In 2016, journalist Del Bigtree issued a challenge to the head of infectious disease at one of the most prestigious medical institutions in the world: conduct the most thorough vaxxed vs. unvaxxed study that has ever been done. The expert, Dr Marcus Zervos MD, took up the challenge and ran the study to prove Del wrong. What the study revealed was so horrifying that it was locked away, hidden from the public...until now. Henry Ford birth cohort (n=18,468) tracked children from birth for 10 years. The Study Found... -4.29 times the rate of asthma -3.03 times the rate of atopic disease -5.96 times the rate of autoimmune disease -5.53 times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders which included 4.47 times the rate of speech disorder and 3.28 times the rate of developmental delay. Notably, the study also found the following: -Brain Dysfunction: 8 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Diabetes: 42 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -ADHD: 262 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Behavioral Disability: 165 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Learning Disability: 65 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Intellectual Disability: 5 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Tics: 46 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Other Psychological Disability 9 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated 👇An Inconvenient Study: Premieres October 3👇 👇Figure #1 From The Unpublished Study👇 👇Vaccinated Study By Hooker & Miller👇 Credits: ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network Del Bigtree Aaron Siri Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® McCullough Foundation Senator Ron Johnson The HighWire Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

The Most Important Vaccine Safety Study Ever Suppressed. Henry Ford Vaxxed vs. Unvaxxed Study: Vaccinated Kids Had 453% More Neurodevelopmental Disorders. Unvaccinated children had ZERO cases of brain dysfunction, ADHD, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities or tics. Soon To Be Released..."Impact of Childhood Vaccination on Short- and Long-Term Chronic Health Outcomes in Children: A Birth Cohort Study" ICAN lead counsel Aaron Siri, Esq. revealed the results of an unpublished study from Michigan’s Henry Ford Health System. The study was done by infectious disease physician, Dr Marcus Zervos, MD. In 2016, journalist Del Bigtree issued a challenge to the head of infectious disease at one of the most prestigious medical institutions in the world: conduct the most thorough vaxxed vs. unvaxxed study that has ever been done. The expert, Dr Marcus Zervos MD, took up the challenge and ran the study to prove Del wrong. What the study revealed was so horrifying that it was locked away, hidden from the public...until now. Henry Ford birth cohort (n=18,468) tracked children from birth for 10 years. The Study Found... -4.29 times the rate of asthma -3.03 times the rate of atopic disease -5.96 times the rate of autoimmune disease -5.53 times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders which included 4.47 times the rate of speech disorder and 3.28 times the rate of developmental delay. Notably, the study also found the following: -Brain Dysfunction: 8 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Diabetes: 42 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -ADHD: 262 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Behavioral Disability: 165 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Learning Disability: 65 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Intellectual Disability: 5 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Tics: 46 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Other Psychological Disability 9 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated 👇An Inconvenient Study: Premieres October 3👇 👇Figure #1 From The Unpublished Study👇 👇Vaccinated Study By Hooker & Miller👇 Credits: ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network Del Bigtree Aaron Siri Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® McCullough Foundation Senator Ron Johnson The HighWire Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Valerie Anne Smith

87,927 次观看 • 9 个月前

The Japanese study showing excess deaths occurring largely in the vaccinated is now being replicated in the US, Australia and Czechoslovakia. The 21 million person study showed deaths peaked 90-120 days post vax. With Prof. Clancy noting new evidence reveals vaccinated young men have a concerning 7 fold increase in heart attacks. Is it any wonder the UK has refused to release their vaxxed/unvaxxed data on the basis it would cause anger and mental distress!

The Japanese study showing excess deaths occurring largely in the vaccinated is now being replicated in the US, Australia and Czechoslovakia. The 21 million person study showed deaths peaked 90-120 days post vax. With Prof. Clancy noting new evidence reveals vaccinated young men have a concerning 7 fold increase in heart attacks. Is it any wonder the UK has refused to release their vaxxed/unvaxxed data on the basis it would cause anger and mental distress!

Kat A 🌸

187,742 次观看 • 7 个月前

"If you are pro-vaccine, you are anti-science." Del sat down with Dr. Brandon Crawford to discuss the award-winning film "An Inconvenient Study." Del: "There is not a single study in the entire world - not from one single health department in any nation in the world - that can show you a study that compared their vaccinated kids to their unvaccinated kids and showed that the vaccinated are the ones who have better health outcomes... Why? Why can't anyone in the world show us a study that the vaccinated are healthier? It doesn't exist. You would think they could manipulate it. And that's why I think when you look at the Henry Ford study, you realize why they can't. The disparity between these two is so vast. There's no way to manipulate the study to somehow get the vaccinated to look like they're healthier. And now what we're left with is a scientific body is never going to admit it was wrong because it's liable. They're liable for trillions of dollars in damages now because they made us take these products, telling us it was making us a healthier nation.... So, we're in a position now where you could sit as a parent, I'm going to have to use my own intuition now, and I'm going to have to do my own deep research, and I'm going to have to start making decisions because I don't want my child's health to be based on a coin toss. It's worse than a fifty-fifty coin toss if your child is going to be free of chronic disease or not. Much worse.."

"If you are pro-vaccine, you are anti-science." Del sat down with Dr. Brandon Crawford to discuss the award-winning film "An Inconvenient Study." Del: "There is not a single study in the entire world - not from one single health department in any nation in the world - that can show you a study that compared their vaccinated kids to their unvaccinated kids and showed that the vaccinated are the ones who have better health outcomes... Why? Why can't anyone in the world show us a study that the vaccinated are healthier? It doesn't exist. You would think they could manipulate it. And that's why I think when you look at the Henry Ford study, you realize why they can't. The disparity between these two is so vast. There's no way to manipulate the study to somehow get the vaccinated to look like they're healthier. And now what we're left with is a scientific body is never going to admit it was wrong because it's liable. They're liable for trillions of dollars in damages now because they made us take these products, telling us it was making us a healthier nation.... So, we're in a position now where you could sit as a parent, I'm going to have to use my own intuition now, and I'm going to have to do my own deep research, and I'm going to have to start making decisions because I don't want my child's health to be based on a coin toss. It's worse than a fifty-fifty coin toss if your child is going to be free of chronic disease or not. Much worse.."

The HighWire

70,670 次观看 • 6 个月前

Deconstructed: How a Lancet Study Manufactured the "Vaccine Safer Than COVID" Headline. A recent headline from The Independent, based on a Lancet study, claims the COVID jab presents less harm than the virus itself. But a closer look reveals a masterclass in how to manipulate data to reach a predetermined conclusion. Here’s how the study was engineered: 1. Rigged Timeline for the "Infection" Group: - The study defined its "COVID infection" cohort from Jan 2020 to March 2022. - This crucially includes the pandemic's darkest period: no vaccines, no natural immunity, failed lockdown policies, and the highest mortality. This group was set up to look as bad as possible. 2. Stacked the Deck for the "Vaccinated" Group: - The vaccinated cohort was studied from Aug 2021 to Dec 2022. - By this time, natural immunity was widespread and the virus had evolved to be less severe (IFR decreased by an order of magnitude). This group was already at a massively lower risk before the vaccine was even factored in. 3. Narrowed the Focus to Hide the Truth: - The alarming graphs you see are based on outcomes in the FIRST SIX MONTHS for each group. - This further hones in on the absolute peak of the pandemic for the unvaccinated, versus a much calmer period for the vaccinated. 4. The "Vaccinated" Group is a Misonomer: - The study's definition of "vaccinated" was a record of a SINGLE Pfizer dose. - We know from robust data that myocarditis risk spikes dramatically after the SECOND and THIRD doses. By ignoring this, the study completely sidesteps the primary source of vaccine-associated harm. The result? A chart showing infection as dangerously red and vaccination as safely blue. But when you analyze ALL the data from the same study—without the cherry-picked windows—the graph flips. It shows the vaccinated group with significantly higher rates of myocarditis, inflammatory conditions, pulmonary embolism, and stroke. This isn't science; it's narrative support. It's starting with a headline and working backward, twisting every parameter until the numbers comply. The days of accepting these "cooked-book" studies at face value are over. It's time for the objective, transparent science the public deserves.

Deconstructed: How a Lancet Study Manufactured the "Vaccine Safer Than COVID" Headline. A recent headline from The Independent, based on a Lancet study, claims the COVID jab presents less harm than the virus itself. But a closer look reveals a masterclass in how to manipulate data to reach a predetermined conclusion. Here’s how the study was engineered: 1. Rigged Timeline for the "Infection" Group: - The study defined its "COVID infection" cohort from Jan 2020 to March 2022. - This crucially includes the pandemic's darkest period: no vaccines, no natural immunity, failed lockdown policies, and the highest mortality. This group was set up to look as bad as possible. 2. Stacked the Deck for the "Vaccinated" Group: - The vaccinated cohort was studied from Aug 2021 to Dec 2022. - By this time, natural immunity was widespread and the virus had evolved to be less severe (IFR decreased by an order of magnitude). This group was already at a massively lower risk before the vaccine was even factored in. 3. Narrowed the Focus to Hide the Truth: - The alarming graphs you see are based on outcomes in the FIRST SIX MONTHS for each group. - This further hones in on the absolute peak of the pandemic for the unvaccinated, versus a much calmer period for the vaccinated. 4. The "Vaccinated" Group is a Misonomer: - The study's definition of "vaccinated" was a record of a SINGLE Pfizer dose. - We know from robust data that myocarditis risk spikes dramatically after the SECOND and THIRD doses. By ignoring this, the study completely sidesteps the primary source of vaccine-associated harm. The result? A chart showing infection as dangerously red and vaccination as safely blue. But when you analyze ALL the data from the same study—without the cherry-picked windows—the graph flips. It shows the vaccinated group with significantly higher rates of myocarditis, inflammatory conditions, pulmonary embolism, and stroke. This isn't science; it's narrative support. It's starting with a headline and working backward, twisting every parameter until the numbers comply. The days of accepting these "cooked-book" studies at face value are over. It's time for the objective, transparent science the public deserves.

Camus

21,909 次观看 • 7 个月前

A recent hearing chaired by Senator Ron Johnson brought significant attention to an unpublished study conducted by the Henry Ford Health System, led by Dr. Marcus Zervos, the head of infectious diseases. The study, which compared health outcomes in vaccinated versus completely unvaccinated children, has become a central point of controversy. Following the hearing, Henry Ford Health System pushed back, stating the study draft faced significant peer review concerns and serious data flaws, and that the institution was unaware the rejected draft was being discussed. Critics, including a Washington Post journalist, have echoed these concerns, labeling the research as commissioned by an "anti-vaccine group" and highlighting methodological issues. However, defenders of the study offer counterarguments to the criticism: - They assert the study was not "commissioned" but was a challenge to Dr. Zervos to prove the safety of the vaccine schedule. - They claim no formal peer review was ever conducted on the completed study. - They argue that while the unvaccinated cohort was smaller, its size was statistically significant for comparison. - They contend that sensitivity analyses—which limited data to one year, three years, and five years—consistently showed worse health outcomes in the vaccinated group, with the results becoming more pronounced over time. The core finding of the study indicates vaccinated children were 2.5 times more likely to develop a chronic disease. Defenders of the research argue that the study's design mirrors the CDC's own recommended blueprint for such comparative safety studies and question why a major health institution would bury concerning results rather than address the alleged flaws and publish. This incident is framed as part of a larger pattern where a comprehensive vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study is avoided by public health authorities. A forthcoming documentary, An Inconvenient Study, promises to explore the entire episode in detail.

A recent hearing chaired by Senator Ron Johnson brought significant attention to an unpublished study conducted by the Henry Ford Health System, led by Dr. Marcus Zervos, the head of infectious diseases. The study, which compared health outcomes in vaccinated versus completely unvaccinated children, has become a central point of controversy. Following the hearing, Henry Ford Health System pushed back, stating the study draft faced significant peer review concerns and serious data flaws, and that the institution was unaware the rejected draft was being discussed. Critics, including a Washington Post journalist, have echoed these concerns, labeling the research as commissioned by an "anti-vaccine group" and highlighting methodological issues. However, defenders of the study offer counterarguments to the criticism: - They assert the study was not "commissioned" but was a challenge to Dr. Zervos to prove the safety of the vaccine schedule. - They claim no formal peer review was ever conducted on the completed study. - They argue that while the unvaccinated cohort was smaller, its size was statistically significant for comparison. - They contend that sensitivity analyses—which limited data to one year, three years, and five years—consistently showed worse health outcomes in the vaccinated group, with the results becoming more pronounced over time. The core finding of the study indicates vaccinated children were 2.5 times more likely to develop a chronic disease. Defenders of the research argue that the study's design mirrors the CDC's own recommended blueprint for such comparative safety studies and question why a major health institution would bury concerning results rather than address the alleged flaws and publish. This incident is framed as part of a larger pattern where a comprehensive vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study is avoided by public health authorities. A forthcoming documentary, An Inconvenient Study, promises to explore the entire episode in detail.

Camus

33,372 次观看 • 9 个月前

The Inconvenient Truth: Suppressed Data Shows Vaccinated Cohort Far Sicker Than Unvaccinated Del Bigtree reveals a hidden-camera investigation into a suppressed study from Henry Ford Health, with allegations so explosive the filmmakers are now facing a cease-and-desist. The study compared health outcomes in children. The results were the inverse of the public health narrative. The data allegedly showed the vaccinated cohort had a 250% increased rate of chronic disease and 6 times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders. Bigtree states: "Had it been the unvaccinated with those rates... they would have rushed this to publication. It would have been the biggest headline across the world." But it wasn't. The findings were allegedly buried because they revealed the opposite of what the pharmaceutical industry wants us to believe. The investigation points to the study's lead, Dr. Marcus Zervos—a world-renowned virologist who led Moderna's trials for the institution. On camera, he reportedly affirms the study's validity, saying, "It's a good study. I would publish it as it is, but I'm worried about losing my job." Henry Ford Health claims the study wasn't published due to poor scientific rigor, not the results. This fuels Bigtree's central question: "If vaccines are making our kids healthier, we need proof of that right now. Show us the study where the vaccinated have lower rates of autism, lower rates of ADHD... then I won't have anything I can say." "Why has no government in the world ever done that study?" Bigtree asks. "They've never been able to prove that the vaccinated are healthier. They can't do that study. That should scare the hell out of everyone in the world right now with children."

The Inconvenient Truth: Suppressed Data Shows Vaccinated Cohort Far Sicker Than Unvaccinated Del Bigtree reveals a hidden-camera investigation into a suppressed study from Henry Ford Health, with allegations so explosive the filmmakers are now facing a cease-and-desist. The study compared health outcomes in children. The results were the inverse of the public health narrative. The data allegedly showed the vaccinated cohort had a 250% increased rate of chronic disease and 6 times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders. Bigtree states: "Had it been the unvaccinated with those rates... they would have rushed this to publication. It would have been the biggest headline across the world." But it wasn't. The findings were allegedly buried because they revealed the opposite of what the pharmaceutical industry wants us to believe. The investigation points to the study's lead, Dr. Marcus Zervos—a world-renowned virologist who led Moderna's trials for the institution. On camera, he reportedly affirms the study's validity, saying, "It's a good study. I would publish it as it is, but I'm worried about losing my job." Henry Ford Health claims the study wasn't published due to poor scientific rigor, not the results. This fuels Bigtree's central question: "If vaccines are making our kids healthier, we need proof of that right now. Show us the study where the vaccinated have lower rates of autism, lower rates of ADHD... then I won't have anything I can say." "Why has no government in the world ever done that study?" Bigtree asks. "They've never been able to prove that the vaccinated are healthier. They can't do that study. That should scare the hell out of everyone in the world right now with children."

Camus

28,429 次观看 • 8 个月前

The head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Health ran what may be the largest vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study ever done. When I asked him, "Is there a better way to do this study?" He said, "I can't think of any way you could do it better." "Is this study important?" "It's very important." "Will you publish it?" "I'm not going to publish it because it'll destroy my career." "If the climate was different, would you publish this as it is?" "I would publish it exactly as it is." That's the man who ran the study, in his own words, on hidden camera. That's why I made the film. Watch An Inconvenient Study. 👇 Mary Talley Bowden MD

The head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Health ran what may be the largest vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study ever done. When I asked him, "Is there a better way to do this study?" He said, "I can't think of any way you could do it better." "Is this study important?" "It's very important." "Will you publish it?" "I'm not going to publish it because it'll destroy my career." "If the climate was different, would you publish this as it is?" "I would publish it exactly as it is." That's the man who ran the study, in his own words, on hidden camera. That's why I made the film. Watch An Inconvenient Study. 👇 Mary Talley Bowden MD

Del Bigtree

122,484 次观看 • 2 个月前

Our study found a 1,236% surge in excess cardiac arrest deaths following the mass COVID-19 "vaccination" campaign in King County, WA. Nearly 98% of the county’s 2+ million residents received at least one dose of a cardiotoxic mRNA shot. The Ultimate Assist Podcast

Our study found a 1,236% surge in excess cardiac arrest deaths following the mass COVID-19 "vaccination" campaign in King County, WA. Nearly 98% of the county’s 2+ million residents received at least one dose of a cardiotoxic mRNA shot. The Ultimate Assist Podcast

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

41,347 次观看 • 1 年前

Steve Kirsch weighs in on the inconvenient Zervos study showing the alarming health risks in vaccinated children. It’s a standard observational study which should have been published but the authors were harassed and muzzled. They are desperate to hide this information because - ‘It basically shows the medical system has been poisoning our kids for decades.’

Steve Kirsch weighs in on the inconvenient Zervos study showing the alarming health risks in vaccinated children. It’s a standard observational study which should have been published but the authors were harassed and muzzled. They are desperate to hide this information because - ‘It basically shows the medical system has been poisoning our kids for decades.’

Kat A 🌸

14,905 次观看 • 8 个月前

Dr. McCullough Explains Why People Always Seem to Get Sick After the Flu Shot He says he was getting sick “virtually every month,” not realizing that the flu shots he was taking could be causing the problem. According to the data, when you get the flu shot, your risk of catching the common cold “markedly increases.” And a new study from the Cleveland Clinic found that last year’s flu shot actually INCREASED the risk of catching the flu itself. The study stated: “In an analysis adjusted for age, sex, clinical nursing job, and employment location, the risk of influenza was SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER for the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated state, yielding a calculated vaccine effectiveness of NEGATIVE 26.9%.”

Dr. McCullough Explains Why People Always Seem to Get Sick After the Flu Shot He says he was getting sick “virtually every month,” not realizing that the flu shots he was taking could be causing the problem. According to the data, when you get the flu shot, your risk of catching the common cold “markedly increases.” And a new study from the Cleveland Clinic found that last year’s flu shot actually INCREASED the risk of catching the flu itself. The study stated: “In an analysis adjusted for age, sex, clinical nursing job, and employment location, the risk of influenza was SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER for the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated state, yielding a calculated vaccine effectiveness of NEGATIVE 26.9%.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

164,252 次观看 • 4 个月前

More damning evidence for the mRNA shot. A new Italian study shows a 30%- 60% increase in cancer in the vaccinated in a population of 296 015. It’s real data. Statistically significant and very concerning says Dr John Campbell.

More damning evidence for the mRNA shot. A new Italian study shows a 30%- 60% increase in cancer in the vaccinated in a population of 296 015. It’s real data. Statistically significant and very concerning says Dr John Campbell.

Kat A 🌸

600,600 次观看 • 9 个月前

"For years, parents have been shouting from the rooftops. Now, they have a microphone." The premiere of 'An Inconvenient Study' wasn't just a screening—it was the sound of a movement. We the people are the distribution company now. It's time to share the truth. AN INCONVENIENT STUDY The film that changes everything.

"For years, parents have been shouting from the rooftops. Now, they have a microphone." The premiere of 'An Inconvenient Study' wasn't just a screening—it was the sound of a movement. We the people are the distribution company now. It's time to share the truth. AN INCONVENIENT STUDY The film that changes everything.

Camus

37,503 次观看 • 8 个月前