Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

An excerpt from my recent interview with 99 ZU EINS in which I explain that NATO isn’t just about ensuring Europe’s strategic subordination to the US — but also, crucially, about providing a crucial logistical and infrastructural platform for the global projection of US military power via the US...

battleforeurope's profile picture

Thomas Fazi

52,893 subscribers

13,770 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

An excerpt from my interview on News Central TV yesterday where I spoke about the link between US State intelligence bodies and armed destabilisation of resource-rich countries in the Global South, including Nigeria.
5:04

An excerpt from my interview on News Central TV yesterday where I spoke about the link between US State intelligence bodies and armed destabilisation of resource-rich countries in the Global South, including Nigeria.

David Hundeyin

77,124 просмотров • 1 год назад

#WATCH | US President Donald Trump says, "...We are talking to other countries about working with us on the policing of the Strait. And I think we're getting a good response... We're always there for NATO. We're helping them with Ukraine... It doesn't affect us, but we've helped them. It'd be interesting to see which country wouldn't help us with a very small endeavour, which is just keeping the Strait open..." (Video: US Network Pool via Reuters)
1:41

#WATCH | US President Donald Trump says, "...We are talking to other countries about working with us on the policing of the Strait. And I think we're getting a good response... We're always there for NATO. We're helping them with Ukraine... It doesn't affect us, but we've helped them. It'd be interesting to see which country wouldn't help us with a very small endeavour, which is just keeping the Strait open..." (Video: US Network Pool via Reuters)

ANI

19,531 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Here we have NATO Secretary General, Mark Rutte acknowledging that NATO functions not as a defensive alliance, but as an instrument of US offensive power: "But also it is a platform for the United States to project power on the world stage"
0:39

Here we have NATO Secretary General, Mark Rutte acknowledging that NATO functions not as a defensive alliance, but as an instrument of US offensive power: "But also it is a platform for the United States to project power on the world stage"

Richard

25,251 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

☠️🇺🇸America's strategic objective to encircle and contain China never changed! Remember the video of US Army Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson, former chief of staff to US Secretary of State Colin Powell? It becomes relevant again after Trump's recent comments about retaking Bagram Air Base. In the video, Wilkerson openly admits America's true strategic objectives in Afghanistan, which were never about state-building or fighting the Taliban. Wilkerson states that the primary reasons for the US presence in Afghanistan are to: 1. Encircle and contain China: Afghanistan's strategic location allows the US to project military power to disrupt and control China's Belt and Road Initiative, which America sees as a major threat to it's global hegemony 2. Destabilize Western China: The US aims to support and use Uyghur extremist and terrorist organizations, like the East Turkistan Islamic Movement (ETIM), to create unrest and destabilize China's Xinjiang province. Wilkerson even mentions that the CIA is training these "Uyghur" terrorists in Syria (Which have now been folded into Syria’s military establishment) Conveniently, the US State Dept. under Trump 1.0 revoked the designation of the ETIM as a “terrorist organization” in 2020 This video exposes America's long-standing policy of using terrorism as a tool to destabilize countries that challenge its global dominance. It also confirms China's belief that the US military presence in Afghanistan was never about fighting terrorism, but rather about containing China and threatening its national security👇
1:57

☠️🇺🇸America's strategic objective to encircle and contain China never changed! Remember the video of US Army Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson, former chief of staff to US Secretary of State Colin Powell? It becomes relevant again after Trump's recent comments about retaking Bagram Air Base. In the video, Wilkerson openly admits America's true strategic objectives in Afghanistan, which were never about state-building or fighting the Taliban. Wilkerson states that the primary reasons for the US presence in Afghanistan are to: 1. Encircle and contain China: Afghanistan's strategic location allows the US to project military power to disrupt and control China's Belt and Road Initiative, which America sees as a major threat to it's global hegemony 2. Destabilize Western China: The US aims to support and use Uyghur extremist and terrorist organizations, like the East Turkistan Islamic Movement (ETIM), to create unrest and destabilize China's Xinjiang province. Wilkerson even mentions that the CIA is training these "Uyghur" terrorists in Syria (Which have now been folded into Syria’s military establishment) Conveniently, the US State Dept. under Trump 1.0 revoked the designation of the ETIM as a “terrorist organization” in 2020 This video exposes America's long-standing policy of using terrorism as a tool to destabilize countries that challenge its global dominance. It also confirms China's belief that the US military presence in Afghanistan was never about fighting terrorism, but rather about containing China and threatening its national security👇

StarBoySAR 🇭🇰 🇨🇳 🥭

14,977 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Rubio: I supported NATO because it allowed us to have bases in Europe that would use for something like in the Middle East. When you have NATO partners denying us use of those bases, what’s the purpose of the alliance?
1:20

Rubio: I supported NATO because it allowed us to have bases in Europe that would use for something like in the Middle East. When you have NATO partners denying us use of those bases, what’s the purpose of the alliance?

Acyn

100,929 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🇪🇺🇵🇱 PATRYK JAKI: I FACE THREE YEARS IN PRISON FOR JUST LIKING A POST Leader of the European Conservatives in the European Parliament and Vice-president of the PiS party, Patryk Jaki: “Lots of us are facing prosecution because we are talking for instance about immigration. I faced three years in prison, now in a special trial in Poland because I simply pushed a like on X platform in the movie which described the real scenes of violence of migrants. So now I have trial. They are talking about the freedom and about the human rights but the fact they hate us, they hate this. So our task is to explain the European citizens that you can say whatever you want but you should look into politicians acts, real acts.” Source: Patryk Jaki
0:46

🇪🇺🇵🇱 PATRYK JAKI: I FACE THREE YEARS IN PRISON FOR JUST LIKING A POST Leader of the European Conservatives in the European Parliament and Vice-president of the PiS party, Patryk Jaki: “Lots of us are facing prosecution because we are talking for instance about immigration. I faced three years in prison, now in a special trial in Poland because I simply pushed a like on X platform in the movie which described the real scenes of violence of migrants. So now I have trial. They are talking about the freedom and about the human rights but the fact they hate us, they hate this. So our task is to explain the European citizens that you can say whatever you want but you should look into politicians acts, real acts.” Source: Patryk Jaki

Mario Nawfal

9,682,305 просмотров • 1 год назад

NATO's Rutte to Fox News: When it comes to NATO, I know there is disappointment, But let's also see that these are isolated cases, because there is something more to say about this. Country after country, ally after ally after ally, have made their bases available for Epic Fury. Thousands of sorties, planes taking off from European bases to support Epic Fury, and therefore Europe being this platform of power projection for the U.S.
0:43

NATO's Rutte to Fox News: When it comes to NATO, I know there is disappointment, But let's also see that these are isolated cases, because there is something more to say about this. Country after country, ally after ally after ally, have made their bases available for Epic Fury. Thousands of sorties, planes taking off from European bases to support Epic Fury, and therefore Europe being this platform of power projection for the U.S.

Clash Report

12,182 просмотров • 26 дней назад

.Palmer Luckey says he also collects US military Nuclear bases: “A while ago I purchased the world’s largest video game collection.” “I also collect US Air Force Nuclear Missile Bases.” “So I put that in one of my missile bases 200ft underground.”
0:41

.Palmer Luckey says he also collects US military Nuclear bases: “A while ago I purchased the world’s largest video game collection.” “I also collect US Air Force Nuclear Missile Bases.” “So I put that in one of my missile bases 200ft underground.”

Jawwwn

538,414 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

A clip from my recent interview with Pascal Lottaz, where I explain how modern propaganda works. It’s no longer just about the mainstream media, but about an entire ecosystem of propaganda spanning every aspect of “civil society” — from think tanks to NGOs to academia. Welcome to the astroturfing of everything.
10:17

A clip from my recent interview with Pascal Lottaz, where I explain how modern propaganda works. It’s no longer just about the mainstream media, but about an entire ecosystem of propaganda spanning every aspect of “civil society” — from think tanks to NGOs to academia. Welcome to the astroturfing of everything.

Thomas Fazi

12,780 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🇮🇳Indian dilemma for USA 👑India, which was once the Crown Jewel of the British Empire, offers tantalizing geopolitical opportunities for the US Empire, often for the same reasons. 🇬🇧And just like the British Empire did not want India to gain independence, the US Empire also does not want India to enjoy strategic autonomy. This is precisely why the US ambassador to India bluntly warned Indians – like a mafioso – that India enjoys no such thing as strategic autonomy. The US wants India to be an “ally” – euphemism for vassal – whose foreign policies perfectly align with those of the US. That is, the enemy of the US should be an enemy of India. (Think Russia, China and Iran). Also, America’s wars should be India’s wars; and ideally, India will allow US military bases. Finally, India should not promote BRICS or de-dollarization. After all, the dollar underpins the might of the US Empire. 2/10
0:33

🇮🇳Indian dilemma for USA 👑India, which was once the Crown Jewel of the British Empire, offers tantalizing geopolitical opportunities for the US Empire, often for the same reasons. 🇬🇧And just like the British Empire did not want India to gain independence, the US Empire also does not want India to enjoy strategic autonomy. This is precisely why the US ambassador to India bluntly warned Indians – like a mafioso – that India enjoys no such thing as strategic autonomy. The US wants India to be an “ally” – euphemism for vassal – whose foreign policies perfectly align with those of the US. That is, the enemy of the US should be an enemy of India. (Think Russia, China and Iran). Also, America’s wars should be India’s wars; and ideally, India will allow US military bases. Finally, India should not promote BRICS or de-dollarization. After all, the dollar underpins the might of the US Empire. 2/10

Sputnik India

13,901 просмотров • 1 год назад

It's good to hear that the US and UK will protect the US-UK military base in the Chagos Islands. But that hardly detracts from the utter strategic foolishness of the UK's decision to transfer sovereignty of the islands to a Chinese ally.
0:31

It's good to hear that the US and UK will protect the US-UK military base in the Chagos Islands. But that hardly detracts from the utter strategic foolishness of the UK's decision to transfer sovereignty of the islands to a Chinese ally.

Mike Pompeo

106,899 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

JEFFREY SACHS: IF YOU HAVE A US MILITARY BASE, YOU'RE NOT A SOVEREIGN COUNTRY World renowned economic and policy analyst Jeffrey Sachs says there is a basic proposition in the world of geopolitics: if you host a US base, you ultimately do not have sovereignty. The US has nearly 800 overseas military bases in 80 countries. Sachs makes the point that 80 years after WWII, countries like Germany and Japan still host US military bases, and have lost their ability to criticise Washington, or even point out basic truths about international relations at forums like the UN. Sachs also appealed to India not to join the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue, which is an informal strategic partnership between India, Australia, Japan and the US. He warns that this alliance is another form of US imperialism and that India certainly had enough from its own long and bitter experience with British colonialism.
1:43

JEFFREY SACHS: IF YOU HAVE A US MILITARY BASE, YOU'RE NOT A SOVEREIGN COUNTRY World renowned economic and policy analyst Jeffrey Sachs says there is a basic proposition in the world of geopolitics: if you host a US base, you ultimately do not have sovereignty. The US has nearly 800 overseas military bases in 80 countries. Sachs makes the point that 80 years after WWII, countries like Germany and Japan still host US military bases, and have lost their ability to criticise Washington, or even point out basic truths about international relations at forums like the UN. Sachs also appealed to India not to join the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue, which is an informal strategic partnership between India, Australia, Japan and the US. He warns that this alliance is another form of US imperialism and that India certainly had enough from its own long and bitter experience with British colonialism.

Sovereign Media

11,942 просмотров • 23 дней назад

SECRETARY RUBIO: NATO wasn’t just about defending Europe, but allowing us to have military bases in Europe for our national security. If we’ve reached a point where the NATO alliance means that we can’t use those bases to defend our interests, then it’s a one-way street.
0:26

SECRETARY RUBIO: NATO wasn’t just about defending Europe, but allowing us to have military bases in Europe for our national security. If we’ve reached a point where the NATO alliance means that we can’t use those bases to defend our interests, then it’s a one-way street.

Department of State

1,231,673 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

“All problems should be solved in the course of negotiations, but they refuse to talk to us, including issues of strategic security," Putin said about the invasion in Ukraine and the expansion of NATO
2:37

“All problems should be solved in the course of negotiations, but they refuse to talk to us, including issues of strategic security," Putin said about the invasion in Ukraine and the expansion of NATO

NOELREPORTS 🇪🇺 🇺🇦

266,312 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Derbent on the left's historical postponement of the military question in an interview with lundimatin ( about his book, Clausewitz & the People's War. An acute question now, as ever. Now also available for delivery in the US:
1:33

Derbent on the left's historical postponement of the military question in an interview with lundimatin ( about his book, Clausewitz & the People's War. An acute question now, as ever. Now also available for delivery in the US:

Foreign Languages Press

25,510 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨 JUST IN: Sec. Marco Rubio just TRUTH NUKED NATO allies to their FACES overseas for blocking America from using our own bases, and continuing to FREELOAD "Some countries are still lagging!" "Bases in the region provided us logistical options that we wouldn't otherwise have and when some of those bases are DENIED to you during a conflict that we're involved in, then you question whether that value is still THERE." NATO countries betrayed us!
0:35

🚨 JUST IN: Sec. Marco Rubio just TRUTH NUKED NATO allies to their FACES overseas for blocking America from using our own bases, and continuing to FREELOAD "Some countries are still lagging!" "Bases in the region provided us logistical options that we wouldn't otherwise have and when some of those bases are DENIED to you during a conflict that we're involved in, then you question whether that value is still THERE." NATO countries betrayed us!

Eric Daugherty

21,215 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Friends, the new atheists told an entire generation of young people that we come from nothing and return to nothing. But the Bible speaks of a God who gives us meaning and sends us on mission. I invite you to watch my recent talk on this theme, which I shared with hundreds of young men and women from Ireland during the Jubilee of Youth in Rome.
36:08

Friends, the new atheists told an entire generation of young people that we come from nothing and return to nothing. But the Bible speaks of a God who gives us meaning and sends us on mission. I invite you to watch my recent talk on this theme, which I shared with hundreds of young men and women from Ireland during the Jubilee of Youth in Rome.

Bishop Robert Barron

32,153 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

🚨Breaking: Donald Trump announces a HUGE tarde deal with the European Union: * EU will buy $750B worth of energy from the US. * EU will invest additional $600B into the US. * EU will will buy billions worth of weapons and military equipment from the US. * EU will open up their markets to the US with no tarrifs. * 15% tariffs for automobiles and everything else. * and Trump got NATO to agree with a 5% of GDP military spending. Wow!
2:22

🚨Breaking: Donald Trump announces a HUGE tarde deal with the European Union: * EU will buy $750B worth of energy from the US. * EU will invest additional $600B into the US. * EU will will buy billions worth of weapons and military equipment from the US. * EU will open up their markets to the US with no tarrifs. * 15% tariffs for automobiles and everything else. * and Trump got NATO to agree with a 5% of GDP military spending. Wow!

Kirk Lubimov

32,499 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Anton Leicht breaks down why the entire US strategic position is now a leveraged bet on winning AGI: "The US strategic position is a leveraged bet on building AGI. You can see that the production pace in China of all these military assets they would need for a great power conflict with the US is just outpacing the US by a lot." "On a lot of the metrics, China is winning. On the AI metrics specifically, the US is winning." "It's extremely difficult to pitch the US on the strategic idea that they should initiate a pause, slowdown, treaty, anything that has to do with AI specifically, when the US thinks this is the one way for us to get out of this. This is the one way to accelerate past all the other developments in China." "RSI is in a real way the strategic endpoint of the current structure of the US stock market and US strategic investment." "It seems very hard to do this unilateral disarmament around this one specific tool that seems to put the US ahead, and then not do something that also attaches to hypersonic missile production and drone coordination and all these things that in the trend favor China instead." Anton Leicht
2:29

Anton Leicht breaks down why the entire US strategic position is now a leveraged bet on winning AGI: "The US strategic position is a leveraged bet on building AGI. You can see that the production pace in China of all these military assets they would need for a great power conflict with the US is just outpacing the US by a lot." "On a lot of the metrics, China is winning. On the AI metrics specifically, the US is winning." "It's extremely difficult to pitch the US on the strategic idea that they should initiate a pause, slowdown, treaty, anything that has to do with AI specifically, when the US thinks this is the one way for us to get out of this. This is the one way to accelerate past all the other developments in China." "RSI is in a real way the strategic endpoint of the current structure of the US stock market and US strategic investment." "It seems very hard to do this unilateral disarmament around this one specific tool that seems to put the US ahead, and then not do something that also attaches to hypersonic missile production and drone coordination and all these things that in the trend favor China instead." Anton Leicht

MTS

10,639 просмотров • 5 дней назад