Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

An MCP server that detects production-grade code quality issues in real-time! Even though AI is now generating code at light speed, the engineering bottleneck has just moved from writing to reviewing, and now devs spend 90% of their debugging time on AI-generated code. AI reviewers aren't that reliable either...

_avichawla's profile picture

Avi Chawla

72,535 subscribers

28,628 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

SonarQube has been catching my bugs and security issues for years. The only friction was having to leave Cursor or Windsurf to view the results. Their new MCP Server fixes that by bringing verification directly into the coding environment 🔥 This is actually perfect timing 🧵 ↓ Because we write more code than ever thanks to AI, yet productivity still doesn’t keep up. Google’s 2025 DORA Report shows the tension: → AI usage +90% → Bugs +9% → Review time +91% → PR size +154% (report here: The problem isn’t generating code. It’s verifying it quickly and reliably. And this is what SonarQube's new MCP Server brings instantly: - Live scanning → trigger SonarQube checks inside Cursor, Windsurf, Claude Code… basically any MCP-compatible IDE - Immediate surfacing → security, reliability, and maintainability issues in seconds - Smooth UI handoff → jump to the dashboard only when you need the full picture - AI-native workflow → Sonar’s long-standing rule engine integrated into your daily loop Why it’s great: • Removes constant tab-switching • Faster write → check → fix cycles • Lets the IDE handle speed while SonarQube handles structure • Feels like code quality finally meets AI-native development Setup is super simple: → Enable SonarQube's MCP Server in Cursor → Add your SonarQube instance → Open your repo → Run the scan directly inside the IDE I then pointed it to a JS component I’m building in Streamlit (psst, it’s called Streamlit ChartJS ;)) → Immediate results: security flags, reliability concerns, maintainability smells, and dependency risks ✅ Then I prompted: "Show me the full breakdown." → Cursor opens the SonarQube UI with rule details, severities, fix guidance, and project-wide quality signals! Exactly on point.
0:37

SonarQube has been catching my bugs and security issues for years. The only friction was having to leave Cursor or Windsurf to view the results. Their new MCP Server fixes that by bringing verification directly into the coding environment 🔥 This is actually perfect timing 🧵 ↓ Because we write more code than ever thanks to AI, yet productivity still doesn’t keep up. Google’s 2025 DORA Report shows the tension: → AI usage +90% → Bugs +9% → Review time +91% → PR size +154% (report here: The problem isn’t generating code. It’s verifying it quickly and reliably. And this is what SonarQube's new MCP Server brings instantly: - Live scanning → trigger SonarQube checks inside Cursor, Windsurf, Claude Code… basically any MCP-compatible IDE - Immediate surfacing → security, reliability, and maintainability issues in seconds - Smooth UI handoff → jump to the dashboard only when you need the full picture - AI-native workflow → Sonar’s long-standing rule engine integrated into your daily loop Why it’s great: • Removes constant tab-switching • Faster write → check → fix cycles • Lets the IDE handle speed while SonarQube handles structure • Feels like code quality finally meets AI-native development Setup is super simple: → Enable SonarQube's MCP Server in Cursor → Add your SonarQube instance → Open your repo → Run the scan directly inside the IDE I then pointed it to a JS component I’m building in Streamlit (psst, it’s called Streamlit ChartJS ;)) → Immediate results: security flags, reliability concerns, maintainability smells, and dependency risks ✅ Then I prompted: "Show me the full breakdown." → Cursor opens the SonarQube UI with rule details, severities, fix guidance, and project-wide quality signals! Exactly on point.

Charly Wargnier

22,702 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Nobody is writing 90% of their code using AI. Here's the uncomfortable truth: The real productivity gain from using AI to write code is closer to 10%, nowhere near the 90% people claim. Sundar Pichai said in 2024 that 30% of the new code at Google was AI-generated. However, he went on to admit, during Lex Friedman's podcast, that engineering velocity had only increased by about 10%. AI-generated code isn't free code. It still has to be reviewed, tested, and made production-ready. Optimizing a single step (code generation) doesn't boost output if bottlenecks shift elsewhere (code reviews). It doesn't matter how much code you generate if you can't keep up the review process. The solution: Automate as much as you can the review and verification of your code. I'm working with Sonar, who is sponsoring this post, and they will take care of the code quality and security analysis of your code: • They review over 300B lines of code every single day • They cover reliability, security, and maintainability for your code • You can integrate them into your CI/CD pipeline • You can install them in your IDE (I use their VSCode extension) • Support for more than 30 languages Here is a link so you can check them out:
4:42

Nobody is writing 90% of their code using AI. Here's the uncomfortable truth: The real productivity gain from using AI to write code is closer to 10%, nowhere near the 90% people claim. Sundar Pichai said in 2024 that 30% of the new code at Google was AI-generated. However, he went on to admit, during Lex Friedman's podcast, that engineering velocity had only increased by about 10%. AI-generated code isn't free code. It still has to be reviewed, tested, and made production-ready. Optimizing a single step (code generation) doesn't boost output if bottlenecks shift elsewhere (code reviews). It doesn't matter how much code you generate if you can't keep up the review process. The solution: Automate as much as you can the review and verification of your code. I'm working with Sonar, who is sponsoring this post, and they will take care of the code quality and security analysis of your code: • They review over 300B lines of code every single day • They cover reliability, security, and maintainability for your code • You can integrate them into your CI/CD pipeline • You can install them in your IDE (I use their VSCode extension) • Support for more than 30 languages Here is a link so you can check them out:

Santiago

296,750 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Write 100x better code using AI (for free!) Install the Codacy extension (VSCode, Cursor, WindSurf). This will install an MCP Server locally on your computer. Your coding copilot will use this server with the Codacy CLI to check every line of code it generates. The way this works is pretty awesome (assuming you are using Cursor): 1. You ask Cursor to generate some code 2. Cursor writes the code 3. Cursor then calls Codacy's MCP Server to check it 4. The MCP Server will use the Codacy CLI to find any issues 5. Cursor will fix the issues and call the MCP server again 6. When the code passes all checks, you are done Level of effort on your side: literally zero! Code quality and security because of this: 100x better! Codacy has been doing this for a long, long time, and their Guardrails MCP Server checks for a lot of potential issues: • Security issues • Quality standards • Pattern violations • Linting issues You can see more information about the extension here: I recorded a quick video to show you how it works. Thanks to the Codacy team for helping me set up everything, answering my 1,000 questions, and collaborating with me on this post.
5:21

Write 100x better code using AI (for free!) Install the Codacy extension (VSCode, Cursor, WindSurf). This will install an MCP Server locally on your computer. Your coding copilot will use this server with the Codacy CLI to check every line of code it generates. The way this works is pretty awesome (assuming you are using Cursor): 1. You ask Cursor to generate some code 2. Cursor writes the code 3. Cursor then calls Codacy's MCP Server to check it 4. The MCP Server will use the Codacy CLI to find any issues 5. Cursor will fix the issues and call the MCP server again 6. When the code passes all checks, you are done Level of effort on your side: literally zero! Code quality and security because of this: 100x better! Codacy has been doing this for a long, long time, and their Guardrails MCP Server checks for a lot of potential issues: • Security issues • Quality standards • Pattern violations • Linting issues You can see more information about the extension here: I recorded a quick video to show you how it works. Thanks to the Codacy team for helping me set up everything, answering my 1,000 questions, and collaborating with me on this post.

Santiago

63,316 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Reviewing AI-generated code is the new bottleneck. Writing code was slow before. Now, in a few minutes, you can generate virtually unlimited lines of code using AI. But developers are now spending 70% of their time checking that code. That's the new bottleneck. I've been using Cline, and they have a feature that actually helps with this: You can click a button and have Cline generate an inline explanation for every single line of AI-generated code. Take a look at the attached video. What it does: 1. You can read the code and the explanation together 2. You don't lose context while reviewing code 3. You understand the "why" behind each change And here is the best part: It works on any git diff. You can use it to review PRs, understand commits from other people, or catch up on a codebase you haven't touched in a while.
3:25

Reviewing AI-generated code is the new bottleneck. Writing code was slow before. Now, in a few minutes, you can generate virtually unlimited lines of code using AI. But developers are now spending 70% of their time checking that code. That's the new bottleneck. I've been using Cline, and they have a feature that actually helps with this: You can click a button and have Cline generate an inline explanation for every single line of AI-generated code. Take a look at the attached video. What it does: 1. You can read the code and the explanation together 2. You don't lose context while reviewing code 3. You understand the "why" behind each change And here is the best part: It works on any git diff. You can use it to review PRs, understand commits from other people, or catch up on a codebase you haven't touched in a while.

Santiago

64,477 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

🚀 1 Click for GitHub MCP in VS Code You don't have to install an extension or mess with your mcp.json files to have GitHub Copilot in VS Code use the GitHub MCP server - learn that one weird trick on how to do it.
1:18

🚀 1 Click for GitHub MCP in VS Code You don't have to install an extension or mess with your mcp.json files to have GitHub Copilot in VS Code use the GitHub MCP server - learn that one weird trick on how to do it.

Visual Studio Code

30,202 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

We've built a massive verification bottleneck: • 72% of developers use AI to generate code every day • 96% of them don't fully trust it Writing code is now free. All the work now is verifying that the code does what it's supposed to. According to a new State of Code Survey, almost half of the respondents believe the number one skill that will matter most in the coming years is "reviewing and validating AI-generated code for quality and security". Not prompt engineering or vibe-coding, but checking AI's work.
3:44

We've built a massive verification bottleneck: • 72% of developers use AI to generate code every day • 96% of them don't fully trust it Writing code is now free. All the work now is verifying that the code does what it's supposed to. According to a new State of Code Survey, almost half of the respondents believe the number one skill that will matter most in the coming years is "reviewing and validating AI-generated code for quality and security". Not prompt engineering or vibe-coding, but checking AI's work.

Santiago

16,299 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Kicking off Day 1 of the launch week with the Chakra UI MCP Server 🖲️ Now, you can connect the entire Chakra UI design system to your AI workflow. Works with: - VS Code (GitHub Copilot) - Cursor - Claude Code - Windsurf - Zed Check it out: #ChakraLaunchWeek
0:29

Kicking off Day 1 of the launch week with the Chakra UI MCP Server 🖲️ Now, you can connect the entire Chakra UI design system to your AI workflow. Works with: - VS Code (GitHub Copilot) - Cursor - Claude Code - Windsurf - Zed Check it out: #ChakraLaunchWeek

Chakra

20,190 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Software Engineering Expectations for 2026 - The majority of your code should be written by AI now - Cursor/Codex/Claude Code/Gemini/etc - You should try all the tooling and switch between them, as each one gets an edge over the others depending on the release cycle. - You should be using AI to check the code that is written by AI - Have AI write tests - Have AI read logs - Have AI navigate your browser - I don't do this every time because sometimes it's simple enough to check it myself - You should still skim code changes - This can be a lighter skim on internal tools and a heavier read through on customer facing code - Use AI to help you define specs
4:12

Software Engineering Expectations for 2026 - The majority of your code should be written by AI now - Cursor/Codex/Claude Code/Gemini/etc - You should try all the tooling and switch between them, as each one gets an edge over the others depending on the release cycle. - You should be using AI to check the code that is written by AI - Have AI write tests - Have AI read logs - Have AI navigate your browser - I don't do this every time because sometimes it's simple enough to check it myself - You should still skim code changes - This can be a lighter skim on internal tools and a heavier read through on customer facing code - Use AI to help you define specs

Ben Awad

535,954 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

I tested a new coding assistant on 34,568 lines of code. (Cursor could not achieve what this tool did.) AI models are improving every day: - Faster inference - Longer context lengths But are AI coding assistants advancing at the same rate? Can they truly understand your entire project? I tested Augment Code on my ai-engineering repo with ~35k lines of code. Augment Code is a powerful AI Assistant built for developers working with large, evolving codebases—needing an assistant that understands the full context of their projects. In the video demo below, I asked it to: - Merge two projects. - Answer a global context question. Here’s what happened: - It understood dependencies across both projects. - It merged them intelligently—without breaking anything. - It even created a README file for the merged project. - It answered my global query instantly, pulling from the full codebase. This is the difference between AI autocomplete and an AI engineer that truly understands your repo. Augment Code is powerful because it indexes your entire repo upfront. This way, it can answer questions instantly, no matter how large your project is. Lastly, Augment Code is fully compatible with VSCode, JetBrains, Vim, Slack, and more. Try them now, I have shared a link in the next tweet! Thanks to Augment Code for showing me their powerful AI coding assistant and working with me on this post.
0:31

I tested a new coding assistant on 34,568 lines of code. (Cursor could not achieve what this tool did.) AI models are improving every day: - Faster inference - Longer context lengths But are AI coding assistants advancing at the same rate? Can they truly understand your entire project? I tested Augment Code on my ai-engineering repo with ~35k lines of code. Augment Code is a powerful AI Assistant built for developers working with large, evolving codebases—needing an assistant that understands the full context of their projects. In the video demo below, I asked it to: - Merge two projects. - Answer a global context question. Here’s what happened: - It understood dependencies across both projects. - It merged them intelligently—without breaking anything. - It even created a README file for the merged project. - It answered my global query instantly, pulling from the full codebase. This is the difference between AI autocomplete and an AI engineer that truly understands your repo. Augment Code is powerful because it indexes your entire repo upfront. This way, it can answer questions instantly, no matter how large your project is. Lastly, Augment Code is fully compatible with VSCode, JetBrains, Vim, Slack, and more. Try them now, I have shared a link in the next tweet! Thanks to Augment Code for showing me their powerful AI coding assistant and working with me on this post.

Akshay 🚀

30,876 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Don't sleep on Claude Code + n8n's automation powers. It's one of the easiest ways to connect Claude Code agents with MCP tools. Here is a quick example of how to combine Claude Code agents with an n8n's MCP Server node to track and share AI news:
3:52

Don't sleep on Claude Code + n8n's automation powers. It's one of the easiest ways to connect Claude Code agents with MCP tools. Here is a quick example of how to combine Claude Code agents with an n8n's MCP Server node to track and share AI news:

elvis

84,823 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Introducing Chroma Package Search Enable your AI agents to search the source code of your package dependencies Includes 3 MCP tools: package_search_hybrid() package_search_grep() package_search_read_file() Add it to Cursor, Claude Code, VS Code, and Codex in 5 seconds
1:18

Introducing Chroma Package Search Enable your AI agents to search the source code of your package dependencies Includes 3 MCP tools: package_search_hybrid() package_search_grep() package_search_read_file() Add it to Cursor, Claude Code, VS Code, and Codex in 5 seconds

Chroma

41,833 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

AI is changing the software engineering craft. Anders Hejlsberg (Anders Hejlsberg) - creator of C#, TypeScript and industry legend - on why code review needs to get more enjoyable in response: #1 - AI is shifting the craft from writing code, to reviewing code: "In a sense, we're all turning into project managers. We can have an army of junior programmers, called agents, that will just spit out reams of code but someone's got to have the big picture and review all of that. And so, increasingly, our craft is going from one of writing the code, to one of reviewing the code and building the architecture of the code and overseeing the work. It's a different kind of craft. It's a different kind of enjoyment. I've always liked writing the code. To me that was the fulfilling part, seeing it work. In a way, AI robs a little bit of that, because I am less interested in reviewing code." #2 - The code review experience should be improved: "I think we could also make the process of reviewing code much more interesting than it is today. I mean, today, you see a list of diffs in alphabetical order and now it's up to you to make heads or tails of it. There are more pedagogical ways of presenting that. And you could have commentary generated by the AI that tells you what the changes are and whatever, and then tries to guide you along. So that symbiotic relationship, I think we need to work on that more and to keep the enjoyment in there."
2:04

AI is changing the software engineering craft. Anders Hejlsberg (Anders Hejlsberg) - creator of C#, TypeScript and industry legend - on why code review needs to get more enjoyable in response: #1 - AI is shifting the craft from writing code, to reviewing code: "In a sense, we're all turning into project managers. We can have an army of junior programmers, called agents, that will just spit out reams of code but someone's got to have the big picture and review all of that. And so, increasingly, our craft is going from one of writing the code, to one of reviewing the code and building the architecture of the code and overseeing the work. It's a different kind of craft. It's a different kind of enjoyment. I've always liked writing the code. To me that was the fulfilling part, seeing it work. In a way, AI robs a little bit of that, because I am less interested in reviewing code." #2 - The code review experience should be improved: "I think we could also make the process of reviewing code much more interesting than it is today. I mean, today, you see a list of diffs in alphabetical order and now it's up to you to make heads or tails of it. There are more pedagogical ways of presenting that. And you could have commentary generated by the AI that tells you what the changes are and whatever, and then tries to guide you along. So that symbiotic relationship, I think we need to work on that more and to keep the enjoyment in there."

The Pragmatic Engineer

39,073 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

"The one thing that's going to be truly future proof is judgment. What is the biggest challenge when you have a thousand AI engineers writing code? AI slop. In an era when you can do everything, the question is which of these things matter. On the engineer side, it is evaluating the code. Which of this code is even valuable? You can have AI engineers writing beautiful code that could be wrong, that could have bugs in it, that could be vulnerable. Someone needs to review it. Make sure to have a human review at some point, especially critical code that is in the core of your system. On the product side is judgment around what needs to be built and evaluating. And similarly in design, you have to have judgment around, does it make sense in the broader design system. I think this judgment is the number one thing that humans are going to bring in an era of infinite productivity."
1:12

"The one thing that's going to be truly future proof is judgment. What is the biggest challenge when you have a thousand AI engineers writing code? AI slop. In an era when you can do everything, the question is which of these things matter. On the engineer side, it is evaluating the code. Which of this code is even valuable? You can have AI engineers writing beautiful code that could be wrong, that could have bugs in it, that could be vulnerable. Someone needs to review it. Make sure to have a human review at some point, especially critical code that is in the core of your system. On the product side is judgment around what needs to be built and evaluating. And similarly in design, you have to have judgment around, does it make sense in the broader design system. I think this judgment is the number one thing that humans are going to bring in an era of infinite productivity."

Patrick OShaughnessy

24,818 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Here's how to build your first MCP tool and server with less than 10 Lines of Python code🐍✨ Tried to make this video as short as possible and show the code, the json config and running the server in vs code with github copilot💜
3:43

Here's how to build your first MCP tool and server with less than 10 Lines of Python code🐍✨ Tried to make this video as short as possible and show the code, the json config and running the server in vs code with github copilot💜

Marlene Mhangami

14,616 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Introducing Deep Graph MCP for Claude Code 🤩 Claude Code by Anthropic is excellent and arguably one of the best tools for working with code today but... It has one major limitation, its native code search capabilities don't scale well to large repositories. By adding Deep Graph MCP, Claude's ability to explore large codebases improves dramatically. In this thread 🧵 I’ll show you how easy it is to connect this MCP to Claude Code.
1:12

Introducing Deep Graph MCP for Claude Code 🤩 Claude Code by Anthropic is excellent and arguably one of the best tools for working with code today but... It has one major limitation, its native code search capabilities don't scale well to large repositories. By adding Deep Graph MCP, Claude's ability to explore large codebases improves dramatically. In this thread 🧵 I’ll show you how easy it is to connect this MCP to Claude Code.

Daniel San

31,974 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Good news for devs working in Visual Studio Code! The MongoDB MCP Server connects your MongoDB data to AI clients, such as GitHub Copilot in VS Code. Now you can ask for collection schemas and data samples, manage users and access, and generate queries all using natural language, right from your editor. Give it a try 👉
1:29

Good news for devs working in Visual Studio Code! The MongoDB MCP Server connects your MongoDB data to AI clients, such as GitHub Copilot in VS Code. Now you can ask for collection schemas and data samples, manage users and access, and generate queries all using natural language, right from your editor. Give it a try 👉

MongoDB

20,070 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The Dev Mode MCP Server is now available in beta. Access Dev Mode data directly in your agentic coding workflow → VS Code with Copilot → Cursor → Windsurf → Claude Code
0:29

The Dev Mode MCP Server is now available in beta. Access Dev Mode data directly in your agentic coding workflow → VS Code with Copilot → Cursor → Windsurf → Claude Code

Figma

253,304 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Ship your API to every MCP client in minutes 🚢 Upload your OpenAPI spec to Stainless → Generate an MCP Server → Your users can access your API in Claude Code Community, Cursor, and VS Code Watch me use the Replicate MCP Server to create a logo for my upcoming AI Podcast Generator, all with a single prompt! Now any MCP client can generate images and videos directly
2:57

Ship your API to every MCP client in minutes 🚢 Upload your OpenAPI spec to Stainless → Generate an MCP Server → Your users can access your API in Claude Code Community, Cursor, and VS Code Watch me use the Replicate MCP Server to create a logo for my upcoming AI Podcast Generator, all with a single prompt! Now any MCP client can generate images and videos directly

Adam Anzuoni

22,423 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

What does it mean for software engineering when we no longer write the code? Here's the take from Boris Cherny (Boris Cherny), the creator of Claude Code. Timestamps: 00:00 Intro 11:15 Lessons from Meta 19:46 Joining Anthropic 23:08 The origins of Claude Code 32:55 Boris's Claude Code workflow 36:27 Parallel agents 40:25 Code reviews 47:18 Claude Code's architecture 52:38 Permissions and sandboxing 55:05 Engineering culture at Anthropic 1:05:15 Claude Cowork 1:12:48 Observability and privacy 1:14:45 Agent swarms 1:21:16 LLMs and the printing press analogy 1:30:16 Standout engineer archetypes 1:32:12 What skills still matter for engineers 1:35:24 Book recommendations Brought to you by: • Statsig — ⁠ The unified platform for flags, analytics, experiments, and more. • Sonar – The makers of SonarQube, the industry standard for automated code review. Proactively find and fix issues in real-time with the SonarQube MCP Server: • WorkOS – Everything you need to make your app enterprise ready. Three interesting things from this conversation: 1. Boris automated himself out of code review well before AI. Boris was one of the most prolific code reviewers at Meta company. And he worked hard to minimize time spent on code review. His system::every time he left the same kind of review comment, he logged it in a spreadsheet. Once a pattern hit 3-4 occurrences, he’d write a lint rule to automate it away! 2. PRDs are dead on the Claude Code team: prototypes replaced them. Instead of writing Product Requirement Documents (specs), they build hundreds of working prototypes before shipping a feature. Boris: “There’s just no way we could have shipped this if we started with static mocks and Figma or if we started with a PRD.” 3. This is the year of the generalist (and maybe the year of those with ADHD) Boris’s work has shifted from deep-focus single-threaded coding to managing multiple parallel agents and context-switching rapidly. As Boris put it: “It’s not so much about deep work, it’s about how good I am at context switching and jumping across multiple different contexts very quickly.”
1:37:58

What does it mean for software engineering when we no longer write the code? Here's the take from Boris Cherny (Boris Cherny), the creator of Claude Code. Timestamps: 00:00 Intro 11:15 Lessons from Meta 19:46 Joining Anthropic 23:08 The origins of Claude Code 32:55 Boris's Claude Code workflow 36:27 Parallel agents 40:25 Code reviews 47:18 Claude Code's architecture 52:38 Permissions and sandboxing 55:05 Engineering culture at Anthropic 1:05:15 Claude Cowork 1:12:48 Observability and privacy 1:14:45 Agent swarms 1:21:16 LLMs and the printing press analogy 1:30:16 Standout engineer archetypes 1:32:12 What skills still matter for engineers 1:35:24 Book recommendations Brought to you by: • Statsig — ⁠ The unified platform for flags, analytics, experiments, and more. • Sonar – The makers of SonarQube, the industry standard for automated code review. Proactively find and fix issues in real-time with the SonarQube MCP Server: • WorkOS – Everything you need to make your app enterprise ready. Three interesting things from this conversation: 1. Boris automated himself out of code review well before AI. Boris was one of the most prolific code reviewers at Meta company. And he worked hard to minimize time spent on code review. His system::every time he left the same kind of review comment, he logged it in a spreadsheet. Once a pattern hit 3-4 occurrences, he’d write a lint rule to automate it away! 2. PRDs are dead on the Claude Code team: prototypes replaced them. Instead of writing Product Requirement Documents (specs), they build hundreds of working prototypes before shipping a feature. Boris: “There’s just no way we could have shipped this if we started with static mocks and Figma or if we started with a PRD.” 3. This is the year of the generalist (and maybe the year of those with ADHD) Boris’s work has shifted from deep-focus single-threaded coding to managing multiple parallel agents and context-switching rapidly. As Boris put it: “It’s not so much about deep work, it’s about how good I am at context switching and jumping across multiple different contexts very quickly.”

Gergely Orosz

491,428 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten