Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

An oath is a constitutional commitment, not a personalized or customized pledge. The Constitution permits only two forms: “In the name of God”, if you are religious. “Solemnly affirm”, if you are non-religious. This ensures that public office remains above individuals and personalities.

49,192 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Open Letter to MP Iqbal Mohamed, I recently watched your video where you stated: “Let the West… let the enemies not divide us.” Since you are a sitting Member of the British Parliament, this raises some serious questions that demand clarification: 1. If the West is your “enemy,” then what exactly are you doing representing a British constituency in the UK Parliament – which sits in the heart of the West, in London? You cannot call the very nation you serve an enemy while holding public office within it. 2. Do you genuinely feel safe living among these “enemies” in the UK? If you truly believe this country and its people are hostile, then standing for political office here contradicts your own statement. 3. Are you stepping back from the oath you took – in the name of Allah – to bear true faith and allegiance to His Majesty King Charles and to uphold the laws and values of the United Kingdom? Your words appear fundamentally at odds with the responsibilities and loyalty required of a British MP. 4. How do you justify using taxpayer-funded British institutions, resources, and a parliamentary salary while simultaneously portraying the West as an enemy? It raises questions about integrity and the proper use of public office. 5. When you say “the West,” are you including your own voters in Dewsbury & Batley – the people who trusted you with their mandate? Do you also view them as part of this so-called enemy? 6. Is it appropriate for an MP to label the UK or “the West” as an enemy when this rhetoric risks increasing hostility and creating fear within communities? 7. Will you publicly clarify whether your allegiance lies with the British Constitution and your oath of office, or with overseas political movements that contradict your commitments as a UK MP? Finally, Do you consider yourself a British representative in Pakistan-linked events or a Pakistan representative inside the British Parliament? Richard Tice MP 🇬🇧 Nigel Farage Reform UK The Reform Daily Zia Yusuf #MPIqbalMohamed #West #ReformUK

Prabhdeep Singh

263,910 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Ganesha is not made of Plaster of Paris. You cannot insult a stone. The real insult is to your own consciousness. Man is the only animal who is absurd. He prays to the river, then poisons it. He worships the idol, then drowns it in filth. This is schizophrenia. The true temple is the river, the air, the earth. You spend 11 days in celebration, but where is the meditation? Where is the silence? The DJ and the alcohol are your escapes. The idol is just a toy. If you want to respect Ganesha, respect existence. Clean the river, not just the statue. That would be true prayer. The Idol, the River, and the Hypocrisy: Drowning the Divine in Filth : The Real Insult to Ganesha. The post raises a troubling question, but the answer lies not in theology, but in constitutional morality. Article 25 guarantees the freedom of religion, but it is expressly subject to "public order, morality, and health." Article 21 guarantees the right to a clean environment. When an idol made of Plaster of Paris and toxic chemical dyes is dumped into a river, it is not an act of faith; it is an environmental tort. The Supreme Court and the NGT have laid down clear guidelines mandating eco-friendly clay idols and designated immersion sites. The "absurdity" is not the ritual itself, but the willful disregard of the law that protects the very water we call sacred. Let us be brutally honest. The top comment is not an insult to Ganesha; it is a mirror held up to a society that has lost its way. The law is no respecter of religious sentiments when they become a public nuisance. If you spend lakhs on an idol, drink alcohol, dance to loud DJs, and then treat the river as a garbage dump, you are not practicing religion—you are committing a public wrong. The "Polluter Pays" principle must apply with full force to pandals, municipalities, and individuals alike. The real insult is not the immersion; it is the sheer hypocrisy of poisoning the environment in the name of God. Enforce the law, or stop pretending we are a civilized society. By NK Goswami,Advocate,Supreme Court

NK GOSWAMI

208,536 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat