Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Anand Ranganathan flipped the script by exposing how the same people calling Modi a "dictator" today were silent or supportive when real dictatorial actions happened in the past. From censorship to misuse of power, he highlighted historical facts that many prefer to forget. The point wasn't blind support, but... show more

Comman Man

32,395 subscribers

54,063 views • 7 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

President Ruto: I did not tell them (transport sector leaders) to call off the strike. They looked at the facts. Many people said they were influenced this way or that way. Maybe they were; by facts of what the situation is.

President Ruto: I did not tell them (transport sector leaders) to call off the strike. They looked at the facts. Many people said they were influenced this way or that way. Maybe they were; by facts of what the situation is.

NTV Kenya

68,901 views • 2 months ago

Anand Ranganathan strongly slammed Zohran Mamdani over his support for Omar Khalid, calling it a dangerous example of selective outrage and ideological blindness. Ranganathan questioned how Mamdani could defend an individual accused in a serious violence-related case while ignoring the victims and the legal process of a sovereign nation. He argued that branding such figures as symbols of free speech distorts facts, undermines accountability, and fuels narratives that weaken national integrity. The sharp response resonated widely, reigniting debate on foreign commentary, activism politics, and where principled dissent should draw the line. Anand Ranganathan

Anand Ranganathan strongly slammed Zohran Mamdani over his support for Omar Khalid, calling it a dangerous example of selective outrage and ideological blindness. Ranganathan questioned how Mamdani could defend an individual accused in a serious violence-related case while ignoring the victims and the legal process of a sovereign nation. He argued that branding such figures as symbols of free speech distorts facts, undermines accountability, and fuels narratives that weaken national integrity. The sharp response resonated widely, reigniting debate on foreign commentary, activism politics, and where principled dissent should draw the line. Anand Ranganathan

Comman Man

13,033 views • 7 months ago

‘India Still Buying 1.1M Barrels Of Russian Oil Daily’: Anand Ranganathan Shreds Claim Delhi Caved To U.S In this excerpt from SUNDAY SCRUTINY, political commentator Anand Ranganathan (Anand Ranganathan) dismantles the viral claim that India has stopped buying Russian #crudeoil under pressure from the #UnitedStates. Responding to accusations from sections of the opposition and narratives circulating on #socialmedia, Ranganathan argues that the facts tell a very different story. According to him, India has continued purchasing roughly 1.1 million barrels of Russian oil per day, and there has been no official announcement or policy decision to halt those imports. His comments come on the back of US Treasury Secretary #ScottBessent's claim that that #Washington asked #India to stop buying #Russianoil, and that India complied. Ranganathan says that 'despite U.S pressure India did not change its policy', challenging the claim that #NewDelhi “capitulated” to Washington. #India #USA #oil Aditi Prasad

‘India Still Buying 1.1M Barrels Of Russian Oil Daily’: Anand Ranganathan Shreds Claim Delhi Caved To U.S In this excerpt from SUNDAY SCRUTINY, political commentator Anand Ranganathan (Anand Ranganathan) dismantles the viral claim that India has stopped buying Russian #crudeoil under pressure from the #UnitedStates. Responding to accusations from sections of the opposition and narratives circulating on #socialmedia, Ranganathan argues that the facts tell a very different story. According to him, India has continued purchasing roughly 1.1 million barrels of Russian oil per day, and there has been no official announcement or policy decision to halt those imports. His comments come on the back of US Treasury Secretary #ScottBessent's claim that that #Washington asked #India to stop buying #Russianoil, and that India complied. Ranganathan says that 'despite U.S pressure India did not change its policy', challenging the claim that #NewDelhi “capitulated” to Washington. #India #USA #oil Aditi Prasad

The Times Of India

21,543 views • 4 months ago

Jennings: What lengths did the previous admin go to to tell the American people what happened with Epstein? Taylor: SDNY was still investigating the case. And the reports are that they were investigating potential coconspirators. And then the administration sent 20 people to get the files from S.D.N.Y. Then what did they do? They did a control-f, looked for trump's name. And then in July, they said, case is over, case closed. But wait, the case is back open tonight. Is that a coincidence or does it have to do with trump?

Jennings: What lengths did the previous admin go to to tell the American people what happened with Epstein? Taylor: SDNY was still investigating the case. And the reports are that they were investigating potential coconspirators. And then the administration sent 20 people to get the files from S.D.N.Y. Then what did they do? They did a control-f, looked for trump's name. And then in July, they said, case is over, case closed. But wait, the case is back open tonight. Is that a coincidence or does it have to do with trump?

Acyn

234,623 views • 8 months ago

I became a great admirer of Anand Ranganathan quite a few years back. He speaks fearlessly and with precision, always backed by facts and data. He is relentless in exposing and dismantling leftists, liberals, and converts. At the same time, he does not spare those within the BJP, who are complacent or negligent. Heres wishing you many more such moments, accolades and fame. Happy Birthday. 🌟🎊🎉

I became a great admirer of Anand Ranganathan quite a few years back. He speaks fearlessly and with precision, always backed by facts and data. He is relentless in exposing and dismantling leftists, liberals, and converts. At the same time, he does not spare those within the BJP, who are complacent or negligent. Heres wishing you many more such moments, accolades and fame. Happy Birthday. 🌟🎊🎉

Dr Poornima 🇮🇳

27,240 views • 8 months ago

Anand Ranganathan argues that Sonam Wangchuk and Abhijit Deepke are unknowingly replaying the Anna Hazare-Arvind Kejriwal script from 2011 — right down to the hunger strike optics. He invokes the history of Irom Sharmila and Medha Patkar to make the case that state intervention in hunger strikes isn't new, while raising a deeper question: who actually solves the underlying issue once the protest becomes the story? He also points to what he calls selective tolerance — right-wing protesters getting absorbed as "one of us," while left-leaning protesters trigger a bigger reaction. #AnandRanganathan #SonamWangchuk #AnnaHazare #Kejriwal #JantarMantar #NEETLeak #IromSharmila #IndianPolitics Anand Ranganathan Aditi Prasad

Anand Ranganathan argues that Sonam Wangchuk and Abhijit Deepke are unknowingly replaying the Anna Hazare-Arvind Kejriwal script from 2011 — right down to the hunger strike optics. He invokes the history of Irom Sharmila and Medha Patkar to make the case that state intervention in hunger strikes isn't new, while raising a deeper question: who actually solves the underlying issue once the protest becomes the story? He also points to what he calls selective tolerance — right-wing protesters getting absorbed as "one of us," while left-leaning protesters trigger a bigger reaction. #AnandRanganathan #SonamWangchuk #AnnaHazare #Kejriwal #JantarMantar #NEETLeak #IromSharmila #IndianPolitics Anand Ranganathan Aditi Prasad

The Times Of India

122,502 views • 16 days ago

🚨 What if the Alex Pretti shooting had happened under a Democratic regime that was confiscating guns? That’s the premise of our new video: “The Death of Sven Doe.” We flipped the script — same facts, same tragedy — but now the victim isn’t a progressive protester. He’s a lawful gun owner protesting a total ban on semi‑automatic rifles. Disarmed. Then shot. And the government called him a terrorist before the facts came out. This isn’t about left or right. It’s about whether you judge by evidence — or by politics. ⚖️ Think for yourself.

🚨 What if the Alex Pretti shooting had happened under a Democratic regime that was confiscating guns? That’s the premise of our new video: “The Death of Sven Doe.” We flipped the script — same facts, same tragedy — but now the victim isn’t a progressive protester. He’s a lawful gun owner protesting a total ban on semi‑automatic rifles. Disarmed. Then shot. And the government called him a terrorist before the facts came out. This isn’t about left or right. It’s about whether you judge by evidence — or by politics. ⚖️ Think for yourself.

MN Gun Owners Caucus

19,263 views • 6 months ago

This speech won’t sit well with Trump or “Israel.” A clear message to 🇮🇱 🇺🇸 🇷🇺 🇨🇳. He didn’t speak in slogans he spoke facts. What matters isn’t the speech… it’s what follows. Because when you break the image of power, the response is never neutral.

This speech won’t sit well with Trump or “Israel.” A clear message to 🇮🇱 🇺🇸 🇷🇺 🇨🇳. He didn’t speak in slogans he spoke facts. What matters isn’t the speech… it’s what follows. Because when you break the image of power, the response is never neutral.

SilencedSirs◼️

350,196 views • 7 months ago

🚨 DHS SEC. MARKWAYNE MULLIN NAILS IT: "Let's talk about the major networks not willing to carry the President of the United States address to the nation on election security. How shameful is that?! ABC and NBC not carrying that? Why? What are they trying to cover up?!" REVOKE THE LICENSES "Why wouldn't they want to inform the American people? Why are they calling themselves a news outlet if they're not actually trying to put the news out there? We wasn't giving spin on the election. The President wasn't trying to re-litigate what happened in 2020, although he definitely could at this point!" "The President was giving facts, what we have exposed, what the Biden administration covered up, what the intelligence community held from the American people, Congress, and the executive branch. And we're putting it out there, and yet two major networks didn't want to cover it. I think the question really should say why." "Because they sure covered the other part of it when they were saying that it was the most secure election ever, what facts did they have? Because they didn't have facts. They were taking someone's word for it. President Trump gave facts!"

🚨 DHS SEC. MARKWAYNE MULLIN NAILS IT: "Let's talk about the major networks not willing to carry the President of the United States address to the nation on election security. How shameful is that?! ABC and NBC not carrying that? Why? What are they trying to cover up?!" REVOKE THE LICENSES "Why wouldn't they want to inform the American people? Why are they calling themselves a news outlet if they're not actually trying to put the news out there? We wasn't giving spin on the election. The President wasn't trying to re-litigate what happened in 2020, although he definitely could at this point!" "The President was giving facts, what we have exposed, what the Biden administration covered up, what the intelligence community held from the American people, Congress, and the executive branch. And we're putting it out there, and yet two major networks didn't want to cover it. I think the question really should say why." "Because they sure covered the other part of it when they were saying that it was the most secure election ever, what facts did they have? Because they didn't have facts. They were taking someone's word for it. President Trump gave facts!"

Eric Daugherty

254,401 views • 18 days ago

🚨 DHS SEC. MARKWAYNE MULLIN NAILS IT: "Let's talk about the major networks not willing to carry the President of the United States address to the nation on election security. How shameful is that?! ABC and NBC not carrying that? Why? What are they trying to cover up?!" REVOKE THE LICENSES "Why wouldn't they want to inform the American people? Why are they calling themselves a news outlet if they're not actually trying to put the news out there? We wasn't giving spin on the election. The President wasn't trying to re-litigate what happened in 2020, although he definitely could at this point!" "The President was giving facts, what we have exposed, what the Biden administration covered up, what the intelligence community held from the American people, Congress, and the executive branch. And we're putting it out there, and yet two major networks didn't want to cover it. I think the question really should say why." "Because they sure covered the other part of it when they were saying that it was the most secure election ever, what facts did they have? Because they didn't have facts. They were taking someone's word for it. President Trump gave facts!"

🚨 DHS SEC. MARKWAYNE MULLIN NAILS IT: "Let's talk about the major networks not willing to carry the President of the United States address to the nation on election security. How shameful is that?! ABC and NBC not carrying that? Why? What are they trying to cover up?!" REVOKE THE LICENSES "Why wouldn't they want to inform the American people? Why are they calling themselves a news outlet if they're not actually trying to put the news out there? We wasn't giving spin on the election. The President wasn't trying to re-litigate what happened in 2020, although he definitely could at this point!" "The President was giving facts, what we have exposed, what the Biden administration covered up, what the intelligence community held from the American people, Congress, and the executive branch. And we're putting it out there, and yet two major networks didn't want to cover it. I think the question really should say why." "Because they sure covered the other part of it when they were saying that it was the most secure election ever, what facts did they have? Because they didn't have facts. They were taking someone's word for it. President Trump gave facts!"

War Correspondent

13,313 views • 15 days ago

Dear Independents: What do you think you're voting for if and when you vote Democrat? Did you forget what happened the last time they had power? This is the same party that caused the affordability crisis. The same party that wants to raise your taxes. The same party that wants a wide open border. They haven't changed. Don't make the same mistake again. NEVER VOTE DEMOCRAT.

Dear Independents: What do you think you're voting for if and when you vote Democrat? Did you forget what happened the last time they had power? This is the same party that caused the affordability crisis. The same party that wants to raise your taxes. The same party that wants a wide open border. They haven't changed. Don't make the same mistake again. NEVER VOTE DEMOCRAT.

Shawn Farash

100,114 views • 3 months ago

While discussing this road rage of IAF officer in Bengaluru with Rahul Shivshankar, Right wing influencer Anand Ranganathan shows a screenshot of ANI from 2023 where an Army officer claimed that he was attacked and PFI was written on his back. Fact : Even that was a staged attack on himself to get 'famous'. The army man’s friend named Joshy confessed to Kadakkal police that he himself painted ‘PFI’ on the back of the Army man's back as per his request. The police recovered the paint and the tape used in the process, from Joshy’s house. Later Police arrested Shine Kumar and his friend Joshy for staging the attack on themselves. Will Anand Ranganathan apologise to the viewers for misrepresentation of facts? Here is the fact check we had done in 2023 :

While discussing this road rage of IAF officer in Bengaluru with Rahul Shivshankar, Right wing influencer Anand Ranganathan shows a screenshot of ANI from 2023 where an Army officer claimed that he was attacked and PFI was written on his back. Fact : Even that was a staged attack on himself to get 'famous'. The army man’s friend named Joshy confessed to Kadakkal police that he himself painted ‘PFI’ on the back of the Army man's back as per his request. The police recovered the paint and the tape used in the process, from Joshy’s house. Later Police arrested Shine Kumar and his friend Joshy for staging the attack on themselves. Will Anand Ranganathan apologise to the viewers for misrepresentation of facts? Here is the fact check we had done in 2023 :

Mohammed Zubair

84,717 views • 1 year ago

No Difference Between Kejriwal, Rahul, Modi: Anand Ranganathan Unmasks Real Face Of Indian Politics In the latest episode of Scrutiny, Anand Ranganathan strips away the carefully crafted image of moral high ground in Indian politics. Using the defection of Raghav Chadha and six other AAP MPs to the BJP as the context, he makes one point clear: no one is above scrutiny. Arvind Kejriwal once built his brand on clean politics. Prime Minister Narendra Modi once mocked the ‘revdi’ culture. Today, those claims ring hollow. The veneer has cracked. What stands exposed, Ranganathan argues, is a ruthless, no-rules arena—where power trumps principle, and yesterday’s positions are easily discarded for today’s gains. #raghavchadha #aap #arvindkejriwal #bjp #narendramodi #rahulgandhi #delhi #punjab #rajyasabha #indianpolitics #ipl #anandranganathan #sundayscrutiny #timesofindia #toi Aditi Prasad

The Times Of India

116,313 views • 3 months ago

"I would trust a Muslim with my life before any Christian..." 😳 This video starts with a claim that will make you pause, but what happens next completely flips the script. Watch how a simple historical argument gets brutally dismantled with facts you were NEVER taught in school. They don't want you to know the real history behind who actually ran the longest-running slave trade—and why it’s still happening today. Most people will swipe away because they can't handle the truth, but if you're ready to see the narrative break, you need to watch until the very end. 🤫👇 Watch the full episode on my YT channel! Link is in the comments 📷

"I would trust a Muslim with my life before any Christian..." 😳 This video starts with a claim that will make you pause, but what happens next completely flips the script. Watch how a simple historical argument gets brutally dismantled with facts you were NEVER taught in school. They don't want you to know the real history behind who actually ran the longest-running slave trade—and why it’s still happening today. Most people will swipe away because they can't handle the truth, but if you're ready to see the narrative break, you need to watch until the very end. 🤫👇 Watch the full episode on my YT channel! Link is in the comments 📷

Jillian Michaels

280,646 views • 28 days ago

Rachel Maddow is spot on. This is not about what Trump is doing, but rather what will the American people do in response to what he’s doing. He governs (if you can call it that) by consent. The big question is do the American people consent? It’s the answer to this question that will decide the future of the United States. 🎥 TikTok -

Rachel Maddow is spot on. This is not about what Trump is doing, but rather what will the American people do in response to what he’s doing. He governs (if you can call it that) by consent. The big question is do the American people consent? It’s the answer to this question that will decide the future of the United States. 🎥 TikTok -

𝔗𝔯𝔲𝔱𝔥 𝔐𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔢𝔯𝔰

110,696 views • 1 year ago

🇮🇱 NETANYAHU: WHY THE WORLD HATES ME? ... PROPAGANDA Reporter: "Why do you think you're so hated worldwide?" Netanyahu: "A lot of propaganda. The Chancellor of Germany said, Israel did the work for all of us. Because those Iranian missiles were geared at Europe too, and ultimately at America. The question you have to ask is not, why do they hate me or President Trump, [but] why don’t they see reality? Why don’t they see what’s good for them? Most of them do if you tell them the facts.” But how do you tell them the facts over TikTok? I don’t know.” Source: Nelk Boys

🇮🇱 NETANYAHU: WHY THE WORLD HATES ME? ... PROPAGANDA Reporter: "Why do you think you're so hated worldwide?" Netanyahu: "A lot of propaganda. The Chancellor of Germany said, Israel did the work for all of us. Because those Iranian missiles were geared at Europe too, and ultimately at America. The question you have to ask is not, why do they hate me or President Trump, [but] why don’t they see reality? Why don’t they see what’s good for them? Most of them do if you tell them the facts.” But how do you tell them the facts over TikTok? I don’t know.” Source: Nelk Boys

Mario Nawfal

44,457 views • 1 year ago

Sometimes a speech doesn’t just answer political claims—it rewrites the narrative. This is one such rebuttal. Superb 😃👌 Ganesh Godiyal systematically challenges the BJP’s repeated claims of “historic achievements” by asking a simple but powerful question: How much of what is celebrated today was actually conceived, built, and initiated decades ago? From infrastructure to institutions, from public sector projects to national assets, he argues that many of the milestones showcased today have their roots in governments of the past—particularly during the Congress era. Whether you agree with his politics or not, the questions he raises deserve to be heard and debated on facts, not slogans. If public discourse is to move beyond chest-thumping and political branding, then acknowledging the contribution of previous governments is equally important. This is a high-voltage rebuttal backed by historical references and deserves a patient hearing. Must watch and listen to Ganesh Godiyal before forming an opinion.

Sometimes a speech doesn’t just answer political claims—it rewrites the narrative. This is one such rebuttal. Superb 😃👌 Ganesh Godiyal systematically challenges the BJP’s repeated claims of “historic achievements” by asking a simple but powerful question: How much of what is celebrated today was actually conceived, built, and initiated decades ago? From infrastructure to institutions, from public sector projects to national assets, he argues that many of the milestones showcased today have their roots in governments of the past—particularly during the Congress era. Whether you agree with his politics or not, the questions he raises deserve to be heard and debated on facts, not slogans. If public discourse is to move beyond chest-thumping and political branding, then acknowledging the contribution of previous governments is equally important. This is a high-voltage rebuttal backed by historical references and deserves a patient hearing. Must watch and listen to Ganesh Godiyal before forming an opinion.

Pragnya Gupta

32,163 views • 22 days ago

Oregon AG Rayfield: Presidents don’t just get to tweet things on Truth Social and pretend that they’re facts. When you want to do the things you want to do as president, you’ve got to have real facts behind them. And if you don’t, you’ve got to be able to prove yourself in a court of law. If you’re wondering what happened in the courtroom, the first thing that might’ve told you the federal government wasn’t doing so hot was when they started off some of their arguments by talking about Truth Social as their source of facts. And I actually got a comment from the judge: “Is this really how you’re going to move forward—based on Truth Social facts?” So it’s bizarre that we have a president doing that.

Oregon AG Rayfield: Presidents don’t just get to tweet things on Truth Social and pretend that they’re facts. When you want to do the things you want to do as president, you’ve got to have real facts behind them. And if you don’t, you’ve got to be able to prove yourself in a court of law. If you’re wondering what happened in the courtroom, the first thing that might’ve told you the federal government wasn’t doing so hot was when they started off some of their arguments by talking about Truth Social as their source of facts. And I actually got a comment from the judge: “Is this really how you’re going to move forward—based on Truth Social facts?” So it’s bizarre that we have a president doing that.

Acyn

100,075 views • 10 months ago

Anand Ranganathan schools Leftist Journo student on Varna, Ambedkar & Mahatma Gandhi's criticism In a heated exchange, a journalism student questioned Dr. Anand Ranganathan on his criticism of Mahatma Gandhi, accusing him of selectively highlighting Gandhi's flaws while ignoring Ambedkar's praises for Gandhi and not applying the same scrutiny to other leaders like Subhas Chandra Bose. Ranganathan first corrected the student on her misconception about the Varna system, pointing out that it is unrelated to untouchability, and insisted she admit her error, which she eventually did. He then firmly rejected the charge of selective criticism, stating his consistent approach: praising good actions and condemning bad ones without shades of grey. To illustrate, he provocatively asked if she would praise Hitler for his watercolor paintings or economic reforms qualities unrelated to his atrocities. Ranganathan maintained that he applies this objective standard to all leaders he discusses (including Gandhi, Nehru, and others), criticizes wrongs when aware of them, and cannot be expected to address every statement from every figure. He emphasized that he is not offended by differing views but stands by bringing out uncomfortable truths about Gandhi and Nehru. Credit : Clear Cut Talks.

Anand Ranganathan schools Leftist Journo student on Varna, Ambedkar & Mahatma Gandhi's criticism In a heated exchange, a journalism student questioned Dr. Anand Ranganathan on his criticism of Mahatma Gandhi, accusing him of selectively highlighting Gandhi's flaws while ignoring Ambedkar's praises for Gandhi and not applying the same scrutiny to other leaders like Subhas Chandra Bose. Ranganathan first corrected the student on her misconception about the Varna system, pointing out that it is unrelated to untouchability, and insisted she admit her error, which she eventually did. He then firmly rejected the charge of selective criticism, stating his consistent approach: praising good actions and condemning bad ones without shades of grey. To illustrate, he provocatively asked if she would praise Hitler for his watercolor paintings or economic reforms qualities unrelated to his atrocities. Ranganathan maintained that he applies this objective standard to all leaders he discusses (including Gandhi, Nehru, and others), criticizes wrongs when aware of them, and cannot be expected to address every statement from every figure. He emphasized that he is not offended by differing views but stands by bringing out uncomfortable truths about Gandhi and Nehru. Credit : Clear Cut Talks.

Augadh

21,412 views • 7 months ago