正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

And here's postgres bidirectional RCE no admin required, client infects server, server infects client ♻️🐛

V12

5,712 subscribers

116,478 次观看 • 3 天前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Client/Server composition with server components feels illegal 😅

Client/Server composition with server components feels illegal 😅

Alex Sidorenko

69,161 次观看 • 2 年前

Moving data fetching between client and server with SWR

Moving data fetching between client and server with SWR

Alex Sidorenko

33,446 次观看 • 1 年前

opencode's client/server architecture is important we're making quick server management smoother

opencode's client/server architecture is important we're making quick server management smoother

David Hill

64,317 次观看 • 5 个月前

Your AI stack just stopped being closed. 🔓 TanStack AI now speaks AG-UI client-to-server. - The same client hits any AG-UI server. - Any AG-UI client hits a TanStack server. Zero breaking changes. Migration guide in the tweet below 👇

Your AI stack just stopped being closed. 🔓 TanStack AI now speaks AG-UI client-to-server. - The same client hits any AG-UI server. - Any AG-UI client hits a TanStack server. Zero breaking changes. Migration guide in the tweet below 👇

TANSTACK

79,086 次观看 • 1 个月前

Server authoritative movement with client prediction and rollback/replay support. In this example, the client exploits by moving a wall out of the way. But the server owns the movement. The client has failed predictions due to the exploit, and rolls back. #RobloxDev

Server authoritative movement with client prediction and rollback/replay support. In this example, the client exploits by moving a wall out of the way. But the server owns the movement. The client has failed predictions due to the exploit, and rolls back. #RobloxDev

sleitnick

20,523 次观看 • 1 年前

New Expo example: graphQL server and client with ✨automatic type generation✨! 🧘‍♀️ GraphQL Yoga - server 💜 URQL - client 🎉 gql.tada - type generation ☁️ EAS Hosting - for API & web deployments

New Expo example: graphQL server and client with ✨automatic type generation✨! 🧘‍♀️ GraphQL Yoga - server 💜 URQL - client 🎉 gql.tada - type generation ☁️ EAS Hosting - for API & web deployments

Kadi Kraman 💚

17,462 次观看 • 11 个月前

Streaming data from server to client with "use" in Next.js

Streaming data from server to client with "use" in Next.js

Alex Sidorenko

36,533 次观看 • 1 年前

When to use Server vs Client components in Next.js 13

When to use Server vs Client components in Next.js 13

Alex Sidorenko

148,155 次观看 • 2 年前

🧵1/2 Socket Programming in C: Server-Side Basics - Set up a server using socket(), bind(), and listen(). - Accept client connections with accept(). - Send and receive data over TCP. Video 1: Server-Side in C! Video 2: Client-Side Programming will be uploaded soon—stay tuned! 🖥️

🧵1/2 Socket Programming in C: Server-Side Basics - Set up a server using socket(), bind(), and listen(). - Accept client connections with accept(). - Send and receive data over TCP. Video 1: Server-Side in C! Video 2: Client-Side Programming will be uploaded soon—stay tuned! 🖥️

trish

2,925,483 次观看 • 1 年前

is now both MCP server creator and MCP server tester (client). You can now immediately test the generated MCP server from within MCPify itself. Using Cloudflare Developers agents-sdk to do this automatically.

is now both MCP server creator and MCP server tester (client). You can now immediately test the generated MCP server from within MCPify itself. Using Cloudflare Developers agents-sdk to do this automatically.

Bhanu Teja P

27,747 次观看 • 1 年前

If you’re playing on MonkeyTilt, the outcome might already be decided BEFORE you bet “The cryptography behind every bet has always been sound” We tested it It isn’t... we sent two different client seeds for the same nonce same result both times the server is ignoring the client seed entirely the player has ZERO influence on outcomes — what we did — opened the MonkeyTilt provably fair verifier with a revealed server seed entered nonce 1 → got 3.04x changed the client seed same server seed, same nonce → 3.04x changed it again → 3.04x the client seed has ZERO effect on the outcome — why this matters — in a provably fair system the outcome is derived from: -server seed -client seed -nonce the client seed exists so the player contributes randomness the server CAN’T predict if it’s ignored the server knows every outcome BEFORE you bet the hash commitment proves nothing because the server already controls all the inputs — not a frontend bug — we checked the network traffic the verifier sends a WebSocket request with: -client seed -server seed -nonce the server receives different client seeds and returns the same result anyway request 1 → client_seed “Clientseed123456789” → 3.04x request 2 → client_seed “NEWSEED12345” → 3.04x this is the server ignoring input not a display issue — live bet traffic — placing a Limbo bet returns: -random_multiplier -total_payout -round_closed that’s it no hash no seed reference no nonce no proof seeds are fetched from a separate endpoint game engine and seed system are DISCONNECTED — nonce verification — you can only verify nonces you’ve already played in a real system all outcomes are predetermined once the server seed is committed - they’re deterministic blocking future nonces suggests results don’t exist until you bet — summary — -client seed ignored by server -no cryptographic proof in bet responses -game engine and seed system DISCONNECTED -nonce verification restricted this isn’t provably fair it looks like provably fair UI on top of server side RNG MonkeyTilt should probably address this anyone can verify this themselves in 60 seconds - open the verifier, change the client seed, watch the result stay the same

If you’re playing on MonkeyTilt, the outcome might already be decided BEFORE you bet “The cryptography behind every bet has always been sound” We tested it It isn’t... we sent two different client seeds for the same nonce same result both times the server is ignoring the client seed entirely the player has ZERO influence on outcomes — what we did — opened the MonkeyTilt provably fair verifier with a revealed server seed entered nonce 1 → got 3.04x changed the client seed same server seed, same nonce → 3.04x changed it again → 3.04x the client seed has ZERO effect on the outcome — why this matters — in a provably fair system the outcome is derived from: -server seed -client seed -nonce the client seed exists so the player contributes randomness the server CAN’T predict if it’s ignored the server knows every outcome BEFORE you bet the hash commitment proves nothing because the server already controls all the inputs — not a frontend bug — we checked the network traffic the verifier sends a WebSocket request with: -client seed -server seed -nonce the server receives different client seeds and returns the same result anyway request 1 → client_seed “Clientseed123456789” → 3.04x request 2 → client_seed “NEWSEED12345” → 3.04x this is the server ignoring input not a display issue — live bet traffic — placing a Limbo bet returns: -random_multiplier -total_payout -round_closed that’s it no hash no seed reference no nonce no proof seeds are fetched from a separate endpoint game engine and seed system are DISCONNECTED — nonce verification — you can only verify nonces you’ve already played in a real system all outcomes are predetermined once the server seed is committed - they’re deterministic blocking future nonces suggests results don’t exist until you bet — summary — -client seed ignored by server -no cryptographic proof in bet responses -game engine and seed system DISCONNECTED -nonce verification restricted this isn’t provably fair it looks like provably fair UI on top of server side RNG MonkeyTilt should probably address this anyone can verify this themselves in 60 seconds - open the verifier, change the client seed, watch the result stay the same

CoinBets🔍

20,973 次观看 • 3 个月前

"How to share state between React client components with a parent server component?" 👇

"How to share state between React client components with a parent server component?" 👇

Alex Sidorenko

51,480 次观看 • 1 年前

Here's how to deploy your own MCP server in 30 seconds: 1. Remix the Replit template 2. Prompt Agent "create a server that does xyz" 3. Select "Publish" Voila - a streamable HTTP server deployed with API key auth Connect to your sever in your client of choice

Here's how to deploy your own MCP server in 30 seconds: 1. Remix the Replit template 2. Prompt Agent "create a server that does xyz" 3. Select "Publish" Voila - a streamable HTTP server deployed with API key auth Connect to your sever in your client of choice

matt palmer

80,137 次观看 • 8 个月前

React tip: "use client" misconceptions (2/5) 🚫 "You cannot nest Server Components inside Client Components because "use client" turns everything into Client Components." ✅ We can pass the rendered result of Server Components to Client Components as props. Simple example: (Server Component) (Client Component) (Server Component) is designed for the client. It needs to instantly open and close when clicked. is designed for the server. It uses packages that don't work in the browser and needs to fetch data close to where it's stored without exposing credentials. So, how can we nest a component that uses server APIs inside a component that uses client APIs... without using `import`? React props to the rescue! --- (0:00) 1-4: Reminder: Importing code forms a module dependency graph. Adding dependencies to a server or client bundle. (0:23) 5-6: Reminder: Using components eventually forms a rendered component tree. (0:37) 9: Oh no! We get an error when trying to `import` a client API (useState) into a server module. (0:44) 10: We know the trick by now: Add "use client" to mark `2.js` as a client entry point. This moves the module to the client bundle and allows us to use client APIs like `useState.` (0:51) 11: But we get a new error! "use client" moved all imported dependencies into the client bundle, including our ORM package, which doesn't work in the browser. (0:59) 13: Let's refactor without changing our rendered component hierarchy. First, we move the `Cart` import to the parent file that imports `Modal`. This moves `Cart` outside the "use client" boundary and consequently the client bundle. (1:11) 15: Then, we pass down the rendered result of `Cart` as a prop to `Modal`. This allows `Cart` to be entirely rendered on the server as a Server Component before being passed down. `Modal` has no knowledge of what the `cart` prop is. Its only responsibility is placing whatever it receives into the `{cart}` slot. (1:15) 16: Finally, it's common to use the special `children` prop for a component's primary content. The key insight is that we were able to use props to retain our desired component hierarchy even though we changed our module dependency graph.

React tip: "use client" misconceptions (2/5) 🚫 "You cannot nest Server Components inside Client Components because "use client" turns everything into Client Components." ✅ We can pass the rendered result of Server Components to Client Components as props. Simple example: (Server Component) (Client Component) (Server Component) is designed for the client. It needs to instantly open and close when clicked. is designed for the server. It uses packages that don't work in the browser and needs to fetch data close to where it's stored without exposing credentials. So, how can we nest a component that uses server APIs inside a component that uses client APIs... without using `import`? React props to the rescue! --- (0:00) 1-4: Reminder: Importing code forms a module dependency graph. Adding dependencies to a server or client bundle. (0:23) 5-6: Reminder: Using components eventually forms a rendered component tree. (0:37) 9: Oh no! We get an error when trying to `import` a client API (useState) into a server module. (0:44) 10: We know the trick by now: Add "use client" to mark `2.js` as a client entry point. This moves the module to the client bundle and allows us to use client APIs like `useState.` (0:51) 11: But we get a new error! "use client" moved all imported dependencies into the client bundle, including our ORM package, which doesn't work in the browser. (0:59) 13: Let's refactor without changing our rendered component hierarchy. First, we move the `Cart` import to the parent file that imports `Modal`. This moves `Cart` outside the "use client" boundary and consequently the client bundle. (1:11) 15: Then, we pass down the rendered result of `Cart` as a prop to `Modal`. This allows `Cart` to be entirely rendered on the server as a Server Component before being passed down. `Modal` has no knowledge of what the `cart` prop is. Its only responsibility is placing whatever it receives into the `{cart}` slot. (1:15) 16: Finally, it's common to use the special `children` prop for a component's primary content. The key insight is that we were able to use props to retain our desired component hierarchy even though we changed our module dependency graph.

Delba

43,989 次观看 • 2 年前

Here's what I'm using for RSC toast. - flash() function that server actions can call - useFlash() hook on the client that gets populated by all the server-side flash invocations Works with redirects, revalidation, progressive enhancement, etc. Blog post soon!

Here's what I'm using for RSC toast. - flash() function that server actions can call - useFlash() hook on the client that gets populated by all the server-side flash invocations Works with redirects, revalidation, progressive enhancement, etc. Blog post soon!

Ryan Toronto

22,637 次观看 • 1 年前

In the latest `swr@beta`, you can seamlessly move data fetching between client-side and server-side, or both, in an RSC framework like Next.js: 🔸Client only: useSWR(key, fetcher) 🔹Mixed: useSWR(key, fetcher) + RSC-provided data 🔸Server only: useSWR(key) + RSC-provided data

In the latest `swr@beta`, you can seamlessly move data fetching between client-side and server-side, or both, in an RSC framework like Next.js: 🔸Client only: useSWR(key, fetcher) 🔹Mixed: useSWR(key, fetcher) + RSC-provided data 🔸Server only: useSWR(key) + RSC-provided data

Shu

267,424 次观看 • 2 年前

If you want to be able to call server functions from the client, RPC is often the move. The Bun + Better Call combo gets you a fullstack solution in very little code. Server, Client, bundling and HMR 👌 had to record a little video showing the setup

If you want to be able to call server functions from the client, RPC is often the move. The Bun + Better Call combo gets you a fullstack solution in very little code. Server, Client, bundling and HMR 👌 had to record a little video showing the setup

Wes Bos

103,642 次观看 • 8 个月前

Introducing: Akash MCP Server Create a deployment on the Akash Supercloud directly from any MCP client — including Claude and Cursor.

Introducing: Akash MCP Server Create a deployment on the Akash Supercloud directly from any MCP client — including Claude and Cursor.

Akash Network

29,333 次观看 • 1 年前

Roblox's server authority beta is almost here! It prevents clientside hacks by making the server the final decider of what actually happened. You have to provide inputs that the server equally consumes or else the client will mispredict and rollback.

Roblox's server authority beta is almost here! It prevents clientside hacks by making the server the final decider of what actually happened. You have to provide inputs that the server equally consumes or else the client will mispredict and rollback.

Max ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

63,064 次观看 • 7 个月前