And how much he loves blurring your boundaries.

Terrifying. As soon as I saw this, saw that smug look on his face, I knew it was on purpose. It’s to rub our faces in it. And I hate it. I’m so livid I can hardly see straight when I really get going. The call is coming from inside the house. We opened the door. Disgraceful

Our politicians don't have the will or courage to oppose this takeover. There is one exception. Governor Ron DeSantis has designated the Muslim Brotherhood and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) as foreign terrorist organizations through an executive order.

@amusicalweapon You are correct. America has let Islamist countries fund and propagandize our youth in colleges and universities. People voting for this infiltrator don’t remember or never understood what 9/11 was.

You don’t need to be a genius to understand the Muslim Brotherhood’s plan Plan B

Don’t get me wrong, always known Mamdani was a fucking liar. He’s one of them. AND YOU PSYCHOS ARE VOTING THEM IN. WE WILL ALL BE COVERED UP OR KILLED IF THIS ISNT STOPPED. now.

🎯

Oh, I see… so @EinavAvizemer thinks that @ZohranKMamdani wants Americans to forget that Muslims terrorists were involved in 9/11. Don’t worry Einav, there are many things that will not be forgotten. 🤙

This:

Telling it like it is…

Can you please shut the fuck up? We all know Jews did 911. Look up Larry Silverstein luckiest man alive or the dancing Israelis. It’s common knowledge. I just hope there’s a tribunal at some point and we get to know the full truth.! please move to Israel and leave Americans alone

NEW YORKERS ARE ALL MUSLIM GOATS

I think Mamdummy and Hussein Obama finished same Muslim Brotherhood school of snakes 🤔

Just yesterday little angel 7 years old girl killed by IDF whyyy!! why u don’t speak against that to defend this little angel every day literllay every day kids being killed by Nazis enough Zionists thats enougggh

We all know it was an inside job. Never forget "The Dancing Israelis"

👆👆👆

We know who did 9/11 - scummy Zios

Well done mr mayor

The Muslims are laughing at us they took advantage of our tolerance, now they’re pissing on it

A lot of people say otherwise about who did 9 / 11 . The same people who got the US involved in a war which had nothing to do with the US .

@tatertotsconor Found the jew

Nailed it, 100%. 🤦🤮

Another reminder to mop my floor.

Why they not blow his head off, they are ready to kill the Presidents of your country but they cannot kill this terrorist muslim that`s kiling your city and your country within... I dont get it where`s the maffia, where`s the mossad ??? I dont get it or is the Jews again mybe?

Islam is evil... Wake Up !

Shut up Jew

Literal shit-show!

The west has fallen

@VP @SLOTUS @ACTBrigitte @AmyMek @TomiLahren @thedebralea

Watch the pattern: 1. “They use your democracy to abuse your democracy” This means: people or groups operate inside the formal rules of a democratic system (elections, legislation, majority votes, institutional processes) in order to weaken, capture, or hollow out that same system. Concrete patterns people point to when using this phrasing include: • Winning elections or gaining institutional power and then changing rules, stacking institutions, restricting future competition, or using state power to disadvantage opponents. • Using democratic procedures (laws, regulations, bureaucratic processes) to entrench advantages that make genuine democratic contestation harder. • Treating democracy as a temporary tool for gaining power rather than a set of ongoing constraints that bind the winners as well as the losers. In short: the mechanisms of democracy are turned against the open, competitive, rule-bound character that makes democracy valuable. 2. “They use your freedom of rights to censor your rights. This means: the rights and freedoms that protect speech, association, protest, and open debate are invoked or leveraged to justify restricting those same rights for others. Typical forms of the argument: • Claiming “hate speech,” “misinformation,” “safety,” or “protecting democracy” as reasons to expand speech restrictions, deplatforming, or legal penalties—while still framing the restriction as consistent with free-speech values. • Using the language of rights (equality, non-discrimination, protection from harm) to justify limiting the expression or association of groups or individuals whose views are disfavored. • Treating free speech as a right that mainly protects “the right side,” so that once power is held, the same right can be curtailed for opponents. The core claim is that the protective norms of free expression are selectively applied: they shield the speakers/actors who favor restriction, while being withdrawn from those who oppose it. Underlying idea Both lines describe a form of subversion from within: the formal rules and moral language of liberal democracy are used not to preserve an open society, but to narrow it. The criticism is that this is possible precisely because democracy and free speech create space for actors who may not share those commitments. Whether any particular group, party, government, or movement is actually doing this is a separate empirical and political judgment. The phrases themselves are a general description of that pattern of institutional and rhetorical capture.