Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

And NATO 🤡 still thinks it can defeat Russia

Leandro Romão 🇵🇹

73,172 subscribers

950,074 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Yorum

Brandon Herrera profil fotoğrafı

Brandon Herrera1 yıl önce

Russia is currently struggling to defeat something that used to be Russia.

The Fat Electrician profil fotoğrafı

The Fat Electrician1 yıl önce

If NATO couldn’t, why did they freak the fuck out and invade Ukraine for trying to join? You thought the paint chips were cornflakes as a kid, didn’t you?

Dan Gainor profil fotoğrafı

Dan Gainor1 yıl önce

Twenty Ukrainians and a bunch of drones and that looks like a junk yard.

Leandro Romão 🇵🇹 profil fotoğrafı

Leandro Romão 🇵🇹1 yıl önce

And then you woke up

david D. profil fotoğrafı

david D.1 yıl önce

a bunch of kids and old people took out the 4th tank division in sumy at the start of the war... 200+ vehicles captured... keep talking

Jay Lightning-NAS, Everybody Was Kung Fu Fishing. profil fotoğrafı

Jay Lightning-NAS, Everybody Was Kung Fu Fishing.1 yıl önce

Russia is still the second most powerful army in Ukraine

Macer Gifford profil fotoğrafı

Macer Gifford1 yıl önce

A line of museum pieces that have failed to take a country 20 times smaller than Russia. This wasn't a military parade, it's a clown show.

Bård Leonhard Pedersen profil fotoğrafı

Bård Leonhard Pedersen1 yıl önce

Because they hold a show every year? 🤣 Retard take.

Maynard Handley 🟦 profil fotoğrafı

Maynard Handley 🟦1 yıl önce

U.S. has multiple of these. 4400 retired planes in this particular one in Arizona. Just FYI…

Leandro Romão 🇵🇹 profil fotoğrafı

Leandro Romão 🇵🇹1 yıl önce

Cemetery

Benzer Videolar

“If Europe cannot defeat Russia, how can we defeat China?” — Kaja Kallas, the Chief Diplomat of EU. 🤡 for WW3

“If Europe cannot defeat Russia, how can we defeat China?” — Kaja Kallas, the Chief Diplomat of EU. 🤡 for WW3

S.L. Kanthan

1,358,459 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Kellogg's message to Russia, 'we are not afraid of your nukes and we can kick your ass.' If NATO actually believed they could defeat Russia in Ukraine, NATO forces (air, sea and land) would have entered Ukraine on day one, full stop, no hesitation.

Kellogg's message to Russia, 'we are not afraid of your nukes and we can kick your ass.' If NATO actually believed they could defeat Russia in Ukraine, NATO forces (air, sea and land) would have entered Ukraine on day one, full stop, no hesitation.

Alex Christoforou

128,958 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Atomic scientist Dikov declared the impossibility of NATO to defeat Russia

Atomic scientist Dikov declared the impossibility of NATO to defeat Russia

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

31,922 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

1986: NATO is just a friend to Russia. 1987: NATO means no harm to Russia. 1988: NATO seeks cooperation with Russia. 1989: NATO respects Russia’s security. 1990: NATO has no plans to move east. 1991: NATO welcomes partnership with Russia. 1992: NATO is only a defensive alliance. 1993: NATO invites dialogue with Russia. 1994: NATO launches Partnership for Peace, not expansion. 1995: NATO says enlargement is no threat to Russia. 1996: NATO assures Russia of mutual respect. 1997: NATO signs Founding Act—no enemy, just partners. 1998: NATO promises stability, not encirclement. 1999: NATO expands—but insists Russia need not worry. 2000: NATO tells Russia it’s stronger together. 2001: NATO claims cooperation is the future. 2002: NATO forms a Council with Russia—equals, not rivals. 2003: NATO insists enlargement secures everyone. 2004: NATO grows again, but still “only defending.” 2005: NATO emphasizes partnership, not provocation. 2006: NATO repeats: Russia has nothing to fear. 2007: NATO says its doors are open, but not against Russia. 2008: NATO pledges Georgia and Ukraine can join—“no threat.” 2009: NATO insists dialogue remains open. 2010: NATO signs Lisbon summit—“true partners with Russia.” 2011: NATO calls missile defense harmless to Russia. 2012: NATO claims transparency, not aggression. 2013: NATO affirms cooperation is still possible. 2014: NATO moves east after Crimea—“purely defensive.” 2015: NATO reassures Russia it seeks no conflict. 2016: NATO deploys battlegroups—“just deterrence.” 2017: NATO insists it honors past agreements. 2018: NATO repeats: expansion is stability, not threat. 2019: NATO celebrates 70 years—still “not aimed at Russia.” 2020: NATO says cooperation is blocked only by Russia. 2021: NATO warns Russia but calls itself defensive. 2022: NATO declares unity—Russia was always mistaken about its “friend.”

1986: NATO is just a friend to Russia. 1987: NATO means no harm to Russia. 1988: NATO seeks cooperation with Russia. 1989: NATO respects Russia’s security. 1990: NATO has no plans to move east. 1991: NATO welcomes partnership with Russia. 1992: NATO is only a defensive alliance. 1993: NATO invites dialogue with Russia. 1994: NATO launches Partnership for Peace, not expansion. 1995: NATO says enlargement is no threat to Russia. 1996: NATO assures Russia of mutual respect. 1997: NATO signs Founding Act—no enemy, just partners. 1998: NATO promises stability, not encirclement. 1999: NATO expands—but insists Russia need not worry. 2000: NATO tells Russia it’s stronger together. 2001: NATO claims cooperation is the future. 2002: NATO forms a Council with Russia—equals, not rivals. 2003: NATO insists enlargement secures everyone. 2004: NATO grows again, but still “only defending.” 2005: NATO emphasizes partnership, not provocation. 2006: NATO repeats: Russia has nothing to fear. 2007: NATO says its doors are open, but not against Russia. 2008: NATO pledges Georgia and Ukraine can join—“no threat.” 2009: NATO insists dialogue remains open. 2010: NATO signs Lisbon summit—“true partners with Russia.” 2011: NATO calls missile defense harmless to Russia. 2012: NATO claims transparency, not aggression. 2013: NATO affirms cooperation is still possible. 2014: NATO moves east after Crimea—“purely defensive.” 2015: NATO reassures Russia it seeks no conflict. 2016: NATO deploys battlegroups—“just deterrence.” 2017: NATO insists it honors past agreements. 2018: NATO repeats: expansion is stability, not threat. 2019: NATO celebrates 70 years—still “not aimed at Russia.” 2020: NATO says cooperation is blocked only by Russia. 2021: NATO warns Russia but calls itself defensive. 2022: NATO declares unity—Russia was always mistaken about its “friend.”

Russian Market

141,611 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨 SCOTT RITTER: RUSSIA'S TRIUMPH IS INEVITABLE The US and NATO tried to use Ukraine as a weapon to defeat Russia by proxy in a conflict they themselves forced upon all. They miscalculated: now, Russia dominates the battlefield and nothing can change it, Ritter says.

🚨 SCOTT RITTER: RUSSIA'S TRIUMPH IS INEVITABLE The US and NATO tried to use Ukraine as a weapon to defeat Russia by proxy in a conflict they themselves forced upon all. They miscalculated: now, Russia dominates the battlefield and nothing can change it, Ritter says.

Sputnik

48,835 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Nina thinks she can defeat Rudeus ..

Nina thinks she can defeat Rudeus ..

Mii Chan

55,234 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

The EU thinks it can block Bitcoin flows to Russia. Good luck.

The EU thinks it can block Bitcoin flows to Russia. Good luck.

Sasha Hodder

10,091 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Someone people really believe NATO can take on Russia and China?

Someone people really believe NATO can take on Russia and China?

Spetsnaℤ 007 🇷🇺

673,943 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Peskov: ❗️"NATO is at war with Russia; this is obvious and requires no further proof. NATO is de facto involved in this war. NATO provides both indirect and direct support to the Kyiv regime. Therefore, it can be said with absolute certainty that NATO is at war with Russia."

Peskov: ❗️"NATO is at war with Russia; this is obvious and requires no further proof. NATO is de facto involved in this war. NATO provides both indirect and direct support to the Kyiv regime. Therefore, it can be said with absolute certainty that NATO is at war with Russia."

Anton Gerashchenko

302,833 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Did Skabeeva’s producers really not think this clip might raise a few… uncomfortable questions when they aired it? 😂 If the AFU is superior to the American military, does that mean it’s the #1 army in the world? If Russia is supposedly fighting NATO in Ukraine, and the AFU is superior to NATO forces, is that why Russia can’t defeat Ukraine? And if Russia is actually fighting the AFU in Ukraine and still can’t win, wouldn’t it just be easier to start a war with a NATO country instead? 🤔 And finally, if the AFU can ‘wipe out’ American soldiers in a training exercise, what exactly can it do to Russian soldiers in a real war? So many questions. So few convenient answers. 😂

Did Skabeeva’s producers really not think this clip might raise a few… uncomfortable questions when they aired it? 😂 If the AFU is superior to the American military, does that mean it’s the #1 army in the world? If Russia is supposedly fighting NATO in Ukraine, and the AFU is superior to NATO forces, is that why Russia can’t defeat Ukraine? And if Russia is actually fighting the AFU in Ukraine and still can’t win, wouldn’t it just be easier to start a war with a NATO country instead? 🤔 And finally, if the AFU can ‘wipe out’ American soldiers in a training exercise, what exactly can it do to Russian soldiers in a real war? So many questions. So few convenient answers. 😂

Natalka

17,052 görüntüleme • 15 gün önce

Arestovych, then the advisor of Zelensky, argued in 2019 that Russia would have to invade Ukraine (with 99.9% certainty) to prevent NATO expansion, and this would be an opportunity to collectively defeat Russia: "Our price for joining NATO is a big war with Russia"

Arestovych, then the advisor of Zelensky, argued in 2019 that Russia would have to invade Ukraine (with 99.9% certainty) to prevent NATO expansion, and this would be an opportunity to collectively defeat Russia: "Our price for joining NATO is a big war with Russia"

Glenn Diesen

277,335 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

NATO is against the ropes They can’t stop Russia’s new missile No air defense system in the West can. How exactly are they planning to defeat Russia?

NATO is against the ropes They can’t stop Russia’s new missile No air defense system in the West can. How exactly are they planning to defeat Russia?

SprintMedia Press

1,632,051 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

And You Still Think Tinubu Can Defeat Atiku? #TableShaker

And You Still Think Tinubu Can Defeat Atiku? #TableShaker

Reno Omokri

105,659 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

🇪🇺🇺🇸🇷🇺 NATO has to protect the Arctic region against Russian and Chinese influence. – NATO Sec. Gen. Mark Rutte PS: Russia owns ~50% the Arctic coastline, we have the world's largest and most capable Northern force, largest ice breaker fleet. Dumbass thinks he can "protect" the Arctic from Russia, lol, I'd say you focus on the Atlantic and Middle East instead.

🇪🇺🇺🇸🇷🇺 NATO has to protect the Arctic region against Russian and Chinese influence. – NATO Sec. Gen. Mark Rutte PS: Russia owns ~50% the Arctic coastline, we have the world's largest and most capable Northern force, largest ice breaker fleet. Dumbass thinks he can "protect" the Arctic from Russia, lol, I'd say you focus on the Atlantic and Middle East instead.

Spetsnaℤ 007 🇷🇺

93,742 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce