正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

And this will be part of the problem. {👇🏼𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘙𝘰𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘵 𝘑𝘰𝘣𝘴𝘰𝘯'𝘴 𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘭𝘪𝘷𝘦} The argument for the unemployed celebrity getting taxpayer funded police security is 𝗯𝗲𝗰𝗮𝘂𝘀𝗲 he still holds status as 5th in line to the throne, and because of his risk factors {𝘸𝘩𝘪𝘤𝘩 𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘦𝘮𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘺... 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯 𝘰𝘳𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘰 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘱𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘢𝘯 𝘰𝘶𝘵𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦}. So let's just say he ends up with taxpayer funded police security. For those reasons. And let's say he's also making charitable and community appearances around the UK and internationally. And he is travelling internationally, as a British prince meeting with political or military leaders, for events and occasions. While covered by Royal rota as part of their 'royal news'. 🤷🏻‍♀️ In a situation already complicated because of the existing blurred lines between 'working' and 'non-working' family members, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 because 𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝙬𝙞𝙡𝙡 𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝙖𝙡𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙙𝙮 𝙗𝙚𝙚𝙣 𝙫𝙖𝙡𝙞𝙙𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙙 by the UK government, by granting him taxpayer funded security largely 𝙗𝙖𝙨𝙚𝙙 𝙤𝙣 𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙪𝙨, any differentiation between 'working' and 'non working' will then have been almost removed. Events such as Easter, Christmas, Christmas Carols, Ascot, Buckingham garden parties, will be overshadowed with 'will they appear', and if not 'were they invited?' And if they weren't invited, why not? And for more serious occasions like ANZAC services, military commemorations, Remembrance Day services such as Cenotaph (𝘩𝘦 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘤𝘢𝘮𝘱𝘢𝘪𝘨𝘯 𝘵𝘰 𝘫𝘰𝘪𝘯 𝘙𝘰𝘺𝘢𝘭 𝘧𝘢𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘺 𝘮𝘦𝘮𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨), Festival of Remembrance, Field of Poppies and other important dates, there will be a constant argument for his inclusion. Whether by media, politicians or the public. Similar to the week of Queen Elizabeth's death, with her funeral and other events. Over the years he has made comments about still having the status, about still being a working royal. And all the UK government needs to do to validate that position is to allocate taxpayer money for those reasons. He can continue to sell that status as a celebrity, as well as be a senior taxpayer funded royal.show more

mrc 🦇

8,629 subscribers

58,948 次观看 • 16 天前 •via X (Twitter)

喜剧新闻政治

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Tell me how this half half grift is still going on? A Californian celebrity family (of over six years), living, working, politicking, raising their children in a foreign country that is not a constitutional monarchy. With full British titles, styles, and official constitutional status ... and it's looking they'll get taxpayer funded security. Very public careers and commercial businesses, all for personal profit. Selling public appearances, goods and entertainment - tv shows, podcasts, all as 'members of the British royal family'. Globally and diplomatically platformed (and likely funded) by an organisation supporting military, established by British monarchy and government, and the position given to this Californian celebrity because he was a member of the British monarchy. No, we don't know how the King will support IG. But any public appearance with the Californian celebrities is an endorsement of the royal status they sell, as well as their commercial interests. I just can't with this anymore 😑 If you want my respect, earn it.

Tell me how this half half grift is still going on? A Californian celebrity family (of over six years), living, working, politicking, raising their children in a foreign country that is not a constitutional monarchy. With full British titles, styles, and official constitutional status ... and it's looking they'll get taxpayer funded security. Very public careers and commercial businesses, all for personal profit. Selling public appearances, goods and entertainment - tv shows, podcasts, all as 'members of the British royal family'. Globally and diplomatically platformed (and likely funded) by an organisation supporting military, established by British monarchy and government, and the position given to this Californian celebrity because he was a member of the British monarchy. No, we don't know how the King will support IG. But any public appearance with the Californian celebrities is an endorsement of the royal status they sell, as well as their commercial interests. I just can't with this anymore 😑 If you want my respect, earn it.

mrc 🦇

16,693 次观看 • 6 个月前

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle DO NOT NEED taxpayer-funded security in the UK. And let’s clear up another ridiculous claim: Harry has NOT been “denied security,” despite what some people are screaming around like headless chickens. Under the bespoke arrangements put in place after Harry stepped back, requests for protective police security are made on a case-by-case basis, with 28-30 days’ notice, so the authorities can assess the circumstances and threat before deciding what protection, if any, is appropriate. He also has his own privately funded security. What he does NOT have is an automatic entitlement to a taxpayer-funded police protection detail simply because he is Prince Harry. There is a difference between being denied security and being denied the level of taxpayer-funded protection you demand. And for everyone repeating, “But Harry said he’ll pay for it” - that is not how police protection works. Police protection is NOT a private service that a wealthy individual can simply purchase because they are willing to write a cheque. Police resources are limited and are allocated according to threat, risk and public interest. Harry also seems to think being a prince entitles him to the sort of highly visible police protection associated with the King and the heir. It doesn’t. Even other members of the Royal Family do not automatically receive that level of protection simply because they are royal. Harry and Meghan already have private security. What they appear to want is the added status, visibility and resources that come with a police escort. And frankly, if this is supposedly all about an overwhelming security threat, why are their movements constantly being briefed to the media? Why does everyone need to know where they are going and when they are going there? You cannot spend your time telling the world about your movements and then demand that the taxpayer provide an extraordinary level of protection because you are supposedly at extraordinary risk. You don’t get to have the perks of the Crown without the duty to the Crown.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle DO NOT NEED taxpayer-funded security in the UK. And let’s clear up another ridiculous claim: Harry has NOT been “denied security,” despite what some people are screaming around like headless chickens. Under the bespoke arrangements put in place after Harry stepped back, requests for protective police security are made on a case-by-case basis, with 28-30 days’ notice, so the authorities can assess the circumstances and threat before deciding what protection, if any, is appropriate. He also has his own privately funded security. What he does NOT have is an automatic entitlement to a taxpayer-funded police protection detail simply because he is Prince Harry. There is a difference between being denied security and being denied the level of taxpayer-funded protection you demand. And for everyone repeating, “But Harry said he’ll pay for it” - that is not how police protection works. Police protection is NOT a private service that a wealthy individual can simply purchase because they are willing to write a cheque. Police resources are limited and are allocated according to threat, risk and public interest. Harry also seems to think being a prince entitles him to the sort of highly visible police protection associated with the King and the heir. It doesn’t. Even other members of the Royal Family do not automatically receive that level of protection simply because they are royal. Harry and Meghan already have private security. What they appear to want is the added status, visibility and resources that come with a police escort. And frankly, if this is supposedly all about an overwhelming security threat, why are their movements constantly being briefed to the media? Why does everyone need to know where they are going and when they are going there? You cannot spend your time telling the world about your movements and then demand that the taxpayer provide an extraordinary level of protection because you are supposedly at extraordinary risk. You don’t get to have the perks of the Crown without the duty to the Crown.

Queen Esther

28,213 次观看 • 16 天前

1/2. Alison Boshoff talking about her Daily Mail story published last Saturday, about the celebrity's visit and his thinking he was getting an updated version of the Sandringham agreement. She says the visit has been well planned for quite awhile, and 'there is support from the palace that can only be coming from the king'. Alison reiterated that her 'Ssx-adjacent source' says Harry believes he will be able to carry out 'working-royal' style engagements and opportunities in the UK, and pursue commercial opportunities elsewhere. Alison says Harry clearly believes he is still a 'working royal' - remember he recently said it in Ukraine. Alison says Harry agreed with the King's request that any upcoming family meeting will not have any social media activity leaked. Alison also says that she told the Ssxes about her story on the Thursday, and offered them a chance to comment. Instead of responding, on Friday the next day, the Ssxes sent operational notes for their visit to their favoured media, which then caused all kinds of chaos as a result because of the security drama.

1/2. Alison Boshoff talking about her Daily Mail story published last Saturday, about the celebrity's visit and his thinking he was getting an updated version of the Sandringham agreement. She says the visit has been well planned for quite awhile, and 'there is support from the palace that can only be coming from the king'. Alison reiterated that her 'Ssx-adjacent source' says Harry believes he will be able to carry out 'working-royal' style engagements and opportunities in the UK, and pursue commercial opportunities elsewhere. Alison says Harry clearly believes he is still a 'working royal' - remember he recently said it in Ukraine. Alison says Harry agreed with the King's request that any upcoming family meeting will not have any social media activity leaked. Alison also says that she told the Ssxes about her story on the Thursday, and offered them a chance to comment. Instead of responding, on Friday the next day, the Ssxes sent operational notes for their visit to their favoured media, which then caused all kinds of chaos as a result because of the security drama.

mrc 🦇

38,213 次观看 • 2 个月前

Over time, this repeated populist posturing, by a leader who is already in Gvt, becomes mere grandstanding for public applause. Why not work to eradicate the plundering, which he is appointed to do, instead of constantly lamenting and presenting his accomplices as hinderances? He is Number 2 and should be telling us measures being instituted to eradicate the plundering and corruption. The people he is lamenting about have been in ZANU PF and Government for a long time and as revealed before actually funded and enabled Operation Restore Legacy which gave his name a heroic glow. Today he stands on a pedestal of heroism chiefly because of the same business people he is now accusing of corruption. If anything we should be the ones taxing him for the plundering and corruption because the accused are people he has been working and cooperating with for years!

Over time, this repeated populist posturing, by a leader who is already in Gvt, becomes mere grandstanding for public applause. Why not work to eradicate the plundering, which he is appointed to do, instead of constantly lamenting and presenting his accomplices as hinderances? He is Number 2 and should be telling us measures being instituted to eradicate the plundering and corruption. The people he is lamenting about have been in ZANU PF and Government for a long time and as revealed before actually funded and enabled Operation Restore Legacy which gave his name a heroic glow. Today he stands on a pedestal of heroism chiefly because of the same business people he is now accusing of corruption. If anything we should be the ones taxing him for the plundering and corruption because the accused are people he has been working and cooperating with for years!

Sabhuku Temba P. Mliswa

57,764 次观看 • 8 个月前

It was just last year, that Prince William was invited to give an articulated and informed speech at the london climate week, at COP26 in Rio de Janeiro and the Blue Economy and Finance Forum in Monaco as President and founder of the Earthshot prize👌🏽 In Rio de Janeiro last year, he also gave another speech as the United for Wildlife summit as President and founder of the United for Wildlife and discussed the work done by UFW in toward that goal. Today, Prince William was invited to speak on the Innovation to Impact panel at the Olympia London Tech Week, as founder and presdident of Homewards UK, to discuss how data and technology help in preventing homelessness, alongside some of the world’s leading tech voices👌🏽 Well then, when William talks about "his work", this is his actual work OUTSIDE of being a royal. This is his professional curriculum, those 3 national and international projects that he runs successfully. And that is why it is very ignorant to compare him to other senior royals such as his Princess Anne and call him "workshy" because he does not do as many royal engagements as her. ALL Princess Anne does as work are royal engagements. However, royal engagements are NOT all William does as work🔥 On top of his royal duties and responsibilities as Heir, on top of his patronages that are common to other working royals, William has a singular professional life as Presiding over these three core initiatives, Earthshot prize, UFW and Homewards UK; He also has his responsibilities as Duke of Cornwall to run the billion pound duchy with all the problems to solve; Put that in perspective and you realise that there is a great deal of work that goes behind running all these successfully, hundreds and hundreds of employees to manage, many meetings to attend, investors to meet, innovations to keep abreast off, and numerous problems arising in all directions..🔥 Yet where Most men in his position would focus on work and neglect the family side, William has found the perfect balance where he built his busy work schedule around his children's schedule, so he can still be a present as a father and do the home school runs with his wife, and take his children on holidays as well. He also make time to enjoy some downtime with his mates and watch an Aston Villa football game.🤗 This does not describe a man who is "lazy" or "workshy". This is rather the protrait of a very disciplined, organised and intelligent man, who knows how to effectively prioritise in life so he can get everything done well and successfully. And that is the credibility that he has on the world stage🔥 #PrinceofWales

It was just last year, that Prince William was invited to give an articulated and informed speech at the london climate week, at COP26 in Rio de Janeiro and the Blue Economy and Finance Forum in Monaco as President and founder of the Earthshot prize👌🏽 In Rio de Janeiro last year, he also gave another speech as the United for Wildlife summit as President and founder of the United for Wildlife and discussed the work done by UFW in toward that goal. Today, Prince William was invited to speak on the Innovation to Impact panel at the Olympia London Tech Week, as founder and presdident of Homewards UK, to discuss how data and technology help in preventing homelessness, alongside some of the world’s leading tech voices👌🏽 Well then, when William talks about "his work", this is his actual work OUTSIDE of being a royal. This is his professional curriculum, those 3 national and international projects that he runs successfully. And that is why it is very ignorant to compare him to other senior royals such as his Princess Anne and call him "workshy" because he does not do as many royal engagements as her. ALL Princess Anne does as work are royal engagements. However, royal engagements are NOT all William does as work🔥 On top of his royal duties and responsibilities as Heir, on top of his patronages that are common to other working royals, William has a singular professional life as Presiding over these three core initiatives, Earthshot prize, UFW and Homewards UK; He also has his responsibilities as Duke of Cornwall to run the billion pound duchy with all the problems to solve; Put that in perspective and you realise that there is a great deal of work that goes behind running all these successfully, hundreds and hundreds of employees to manage, many meetings to attend, investors to meet, innovations to keep abreast off, and numerous problems arising in all directions..🔥 Yet where Most men in his position would focus on work and neglect the family side, William has found the perfect balance where he built his busy work schedule around his children's schedule, so he can still be a present as a father and do the home school runs with his wife, and take his children on holidays as well. He also make time to enjoy some downtime with his mates and watch an Aston Villa football game.🤗 This does not describe a man who is "lazy" or "workshy". This is rather the protrait of a very disciplined, organised and intelligent man, who knows how to effectively prioritise in life so he can get everything done well and successfully. And that is the credibility that he has on the world stage🔥 #PrinceofWales

Canellecitadelle

38,813 次观看 • 3 个月前

“The royal family needs Prince Harry, Harry doesn’t really need the royal family.” Nina Obviously the right wing twat spouts delusion that Harry misses the U.K., regrets leaving, Meghan gave him a wrist burn to do it and that he left for ‘ridiculous’ reasons. That does fascinate me. If Harry’s reasons for leaving as a working royal why do these twats get so angry about his interviews and memoir and say they were damaging to the monarchy? 🤔 Ridiculous reasons are damaging? I think it’s time to do a list of these reasons and see just how ridiculous they are.

“The royal family needs Prince Harry, Harry doesn’t really need the royal family.” Nina Obviously the right wing twat spouts delusion that Harry misses the U.K., regrets leaving, Meghan gave him a wrist burn to do it and that he left for ‘ridiculous’ reasons. That does fascinate me. If Harry’s reasons for leaving as a working royal why do these twats get so angry about his interviews and memoir and say they were damaging to the monarchy? 🤔 Ridiculous reasons are damaging? I think it’s time to do a list of these reasons and see just how ridiculous they are.

Glow Lee

24,922 次观看 • 1 年前

🤔🧐💭THINK PIECE!!! Here I am addressing the rageful fixation of anti Meghan & Harry monarchy trolls constantly whinging on about wanting them to give up their titles. ♦️Most of these disingenuous misinformation trolls like Cristo do so much study on H&M (often more than their supporters) that they already know they offered the titles back in 2020 and the monarchy rejected this asking only that they do not formally or commercially use their HRH titles. ♦️The trolls resent H&M for doing what other royals did (including Charles) and exposing the cruelty behind palace walls by family members. These trolls still want them to suffer so they have to run back and be abused & controlled again. They PRETEND their success and financial prosperity outside the institution is solely due to the titles rather than their own acumen, appeal and personality. Meanwhile Meghan was a business woman, actress & millionaire before involvement in the monarchy or any title. Titled Fergie who had suffered many financial crises in desperation had to be housed on royal grounds while divorced to her royal husband and Prince Edward’s production company failed when he tried to be financially independent, thus proving titles do not guarantee success and financial prosperity. That argument is used to undermine the success of the ones who have achieved success. ♦️Like many other media trolls Cristo Foufas on the other hand claims flippantly that H&M have flopped in their ventures which therefore undermines his argument that titles equate to success rather than merit. ♦️Even without the Duke titles, H&M are Prince and Meghan Princess Henry of Wales. But even if not that either, despite their upset at ill treatment by the monarchy H&M’s intention to ‘breakaway’ from it by offering up their titles has proved to be a fantasy teased as if by the devil wishing to trick them. You cannot un-royal a blood royal and un-royal the royal made one (Meghan) by marriage who is still married to him. This is unlike Diana & Fergie who were no longer married to their blood royals while retaining their titles. ♦️The calls for Meghan to give up her title while still married to her blood royal husband while there were no such calls for Diana and Fergie to give up theirs when they were legitimately delegitimised by divorce, and while all three women spoke out in criticism against the monarchy, has a strong whiff of Meghan being singled out over those English wives. 👀 ♦️Despite trying to ‘breakaway’ Prince Harry has been expected /pressured by the royal media (royal rota reporters) to attend family and state events such as Prince Philips and The Queen’s funerals, The Jubilee celebrations & The Head of State’s Coronation. Without his title this would have still been expected. ♦️When H&M were silent for a year after leaving they were still attacked by royal rota media as if they were royals. ♦️When H&M stopped getting tax funded money & even security they were still attacked by royal rota media as if they were royals. ♦️Harry has discovered that favourable or not he will still be treated/covered like a high profile royal whether or not his Duke title was accepted when offered but in any case, this and certainly his Prince title, is his identity. Being the 2nd son of the living monarch is too. The Sussex title is now their name as a family with Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet Diana. When a regularly person falls out with their family and moves away for peace are they expected to cancel their name if it changes nothing about their identity & profile? ♦️The calls for them to give up their titles are disingenuous since they offered it & now this is their family name and the cannot breakaway from their royal identity & profile, the titles being unused serve no purpose other than denying a reality and making malicious trolls who will still track their every royal move like there is no change in status but fake delegitimisation weaponised to abuse them more.

Glow Lee

21,982 次观看 • 8 个月前

We’d like to share a message with you. Following the tragic events that deeply affected us all over the summer, and the sentencing last week, we feel now is the right time to say: thank you to the amazing people of Southport, Merseyside and beyond. We will continue to be there for you as we move forward as a community. We are working hard to keep the area we so proudly serve a safe place to be. Despite us all being rocked by the events that took place last summer, we remain strong, united and we stand together. Please take a moment to watch this video and hear about how the police and community have supported each other in this toughest of times. As always, our thoughts remain with the families of Alice, Bebe and Elsie, as well as everyone involved in and affected by the tragic events of 29th July.

We’d like to share a message with you. Following the tragic events that deeply affected us all over the summer, and the sentencing last week, we feel now is the right time to say: thank you to the amazing people of Southport, Merseyside and beyond. We will continue to be there for you as we move forward as a community. We are working hard to keep the area we so proudly serve a safe place to be. Despite us all being rocked by the events that took place last summer, we remain strong, united and we stand together. Please take a moment to watch this video and hear about how the police and community have supported each other in this toughest of times. As always, our thoughts remain with the families of Alice, Bebe and Elsie, as well as everyone involved in and affected by the tragic events of 29th July.

Merseyside Police

63,542 次观看 • 1 年前

When sitting MP Will Fowles smashed through a Canberra hotel door in 2019, during what he later described as a period of drug and alcohol addiction, he was given taxpayer-funded leave to recover. Three years later, Labor endorsed him to run again, and he won Ringwood. Compare that with Warren Pickering, who has admitted to and apologised for drug use as a young man - well before he turned his life around, raised his family and served his country. People should not be defined forever by mistakes they have taken responsibility for and worked to overcome. The key distinction between the two cases is that Fowles’ conduct occurred while he was already in office, whereas Pickering’s predates his entire political involvement by nearly 20 years. There has also been far too little weight given in subsequent reporting to the testimony of Pickering’s children, who have strongly defended their father and described his ex-partner as a “narcissistic liar”. The fact that she continues to be elevated by some journalists as a reliable source to fuel further negative coverage is deeply disappointing, particularly given the impact this is now having on the children, who say their father protected and supported them. There is also a clear double standard in the way the two stories have been treated. Fowles’ conduct while in office was ultimately absorbed by his party and, three years later, by the electorate. Pickering’s much older history, meanwhile, is being treated in parts of the media as though it should be disqualifying. Voters did not appear to concerned by Fowles’ conduct in office when they returned him to Parliament, and I suspect it will be much the same with those already voting for Pickering and One Nation Australia. I joined Prue MacSween and Rita Panahi on News24 Australia to discuss the coverage. #SpringSt

When sitting MP Will Fowles smashed through a Canberra hotel door in 2019, during what he later described as a period of drug and alcohol addiction, he was given taxpayer-funded leave to recover. Three years later, Labor endorsed him to run again, and he won Ringwood. Compare that with Warren Pickering, who has admitted to and apologised for drug use as a young man - well before he turned his life around, raised his family and served his country. People should not be defined forever by mistakes they have taken responsibility for and worked to overcome. The key distinction between the two cases is that Fowles’ conduct occurred while he was already in office, whereas Pickering’s predates his entire political involvement by nearly 20 years. There has also been far too little weight given in subsequent reporting to the testimony of Pickering’s children, who have strongly defended their father and described his ex-partner as a “narcissistic liar”. The fact that she continues to be elevated by some journalists as a reliable source to fuel further negative coverage is deeply disappointing, particularly given the impact this is now having on the children, who say their father protected and supported them. There is also a clear double standard in the way the two stories have been treated. Fowles’ conduct while in office was ultimately absorbed by his party and, three years later, by the electorate. Pickering’s much older history, meanwhile, is being treated in parts of the media as though it should be disqualifying. Voters did not appear to concerned by Fowles’ conduct in office when they returned him to Parliament, and I suspect it will be much the same with those already voting for Pickering and One Nation Australia. I joined Prue MacSween and Rita Panahi on News24 Australia to discuss the coverage. #SpringSt

Stephanie Bastiaan

14,545 次观看 • 4 天前

STEALING THE SPOTLIGHT????? NORMALISE THE ROYAL FAMILY NOT HAVING A CLAIM ON EVERY SINGLE DAY OF THE WEEK AGAINST PRINCE HARRY AND DUCHESS MEGHAN. What the Royal PR machine seeks to do is to put some kind of claim on any day of the week so that any time Harry and Meghan do something they can be accused of being demonic or manipulative because it was on a certain day or just before or after a certain day. PLEASE DO NOT LET ROYAL REPORTERS CHANGE YOUR SENSE OF MORALITY OR THINK THAT EVERYTHING IS ABOUT THE ROYAL FAMILY GETTING FIRST & ONLY RIGHTS TO A DAY. ♦️Day claiming shows the continued ARROGANCE OF THE ROYAL INSTITUTION and what a toxic entitlement it has. ♦️Meghan Markle launched her new business #AmericanRivieraOrchard on instagram on her and Harry’s SUSSEX FREEDOM DAY (14th March) - 4 year anniversary. This day is important to them. (See video👇). The day is not owned by anyone. ♦️PRINCESS DIANA would probably love this launch release day choice as she sought to be free too. Obviously the Royal would not love it as they do not support or celebrate the idea of the Sussexes being free and happy and neither do their reporters. ♦️There is nothing wrong with more than one event or occurrence happening on one day. It will happen many more times. Each can be covered by the press. It happens all the time with celebrities. The same applies to royals. But it’s ONLY A PROBLEM WHEN IT’S HARRY & MEGHAN because of the hate incitement campaign of the royals and their reporters. ♦️Harry and Meghan were held back from doing things they wanted while in the team of working royals. Now THEY ARE INDEPENDENT FROM THE ROYAL INSTITUTION’S programme. The whole point of this is freedom of planning and choices. Yet it seems they are still expected to hold themselves back and be at the beckon call, demands of the institution. ♦️The royals and their team have an ongoing desire to control and restrict Harry and Meghan even though they are now independent. But sorry because THEY CAN NOW DEVISE THEIR SCHEDULE ACCORDING TO THEIR OWN DESIRED TIMETABLE and should not have to change it if they become aware of a clash with another royal. ♦️The royals do not need to and do not change their schedule because of Harry and Meghan. So ditto! ♦️Often Prince William and Kate Middleton have heard announcements of the Sussexes fewer and far between events well in advance and (I believe) purposefully scheduled an event to clash as they benefit from being tagged on to the disproportionately higher global reporting on H&Ms event compared. THIS IS PR HIJACKING and their royal rota really take up that opportunity to tag them in. ♦️Why do people not accuse the Royals of being manipulative or demonic when they clash with a Sussex event announced ages ago? It’s because the reporters try to programme us to think they have a right to dominate and override. The institution’s sheep. 🐑🐏 ♦️WHAT’S THE PROBLEM? Why should it be a concern that Harry and Meghan do something on the same day as the royals who are a powerful institution and ‘apparently’ have more backing, support and clout anyway. Apparently!!! ♦️THE ROYALS & THEIR TEAM ARE LACKING IN SELF ESTEEM if they’re worried, bothered and complaining about schedule clashes with Harry and Meghan in another country and appealing to a different audience. Saturday morning comment piece over. 🙂

STEALING THE SPOTLIGHT????? NORMALISE THE ROYAL FAMILY NOT HAVING A CLAIM ON EVERY SINGLE DAY OF THE WEEK AGAINST PRINCE HARRY AND DUCHESS MEGHAN. What the Royal PR machine seeks to do is to put some kind of claim on any day of the week so that any time Harry and Meghan do something they can be accused of being demonic or manipulative because it was on a certain day or just before or after a certain day. PLEASE DO NOT LET ROYAL REPORTERS CHANGE YOUR SENSE OF MORALITY OR THINK THAT EVERYTHING IS ABOUT THE ROYAL FAMILY GETTING FIRST & ONLY RIGHTS TO A DAY. ♦️Day claiming shows the continued ARROGANCE OF THE ROYAL INSTITUTION and what a toxic entitlement it has. ♦️Meghan Markle launched her new business #AmericanRivieraOrchard on instagram on her and Harry’s SUSSEX FREEDOM DAY (14th March) - 4 year anniversary. This day is important to them. (See video👇). The day is not owned by anyone. ♦️PRINCESS DIANA would probably love this launch release day choice as she sought to be free too. Obviously the Royal would not love it as they do not support or celebrate the idea of the Sussexes being free and happy and neither do their reporters. ♦️There is nothing wrong with more than one event or occurrence happening on one day. It will happen many more times. Each can be covered by the press. It happens all the time with celebrities. The same applies to royals. But it’s ONLY A PROBLEM WHEN IT’S HARRY & MEGHAN because of the hate incitement campaign of the royals and their reporters. ♦️Harry and Meghan were held back from doing things they wanted while in the team of working royals. Now THEY ARE INDEPENDENT FROM THE ROYAL INSTITUTION’S programme. The whole point of this is freedom of planning and choices. Yet it seems they are still expected to hold themselves back and be at the beckon call, demands of the institution. ♦️The royals and their team have an ongoing desire to control and restrict Harry and Meghan even though they are now independent. But sorry because THEY CAN NOW DEVISE THEIR SCHEDULE ACCORDING TO THEIR OWN DESIRED TIMETABLE and should not have to change it if they become aware of a clash with another royal. ♦️The royals do not need to and do not change their schedule because of Harry and Meghan. So ditto! ♦️Often Prince William and Kate Middleton have heard announcements of the Sussexes fewer and far between events well in advance and (I believe) purposefully scheduled an event to clash as they benefit from being tagged on to the disproportionately higher global reporting on H&Ms event compared. THIS IS PR HIJACKING and their royal rota really take up that opportunity to tag them in. ♦️Why do people not accuse the Royals of being manipulative or demonic when they clash with a Sussex event announced ages ago? It’s because the reporters try to programme us to think they have a right to dominate and override. The institution’s sheep. 🐑🐏 ♦️WHAT’S THE PROBLEM? Why should it be a concern that Harry and Meghan do something on the same day as the royals who are a powerful institution and ‘apparently’ have more backing, support and clout anyway. Apparently!!! ♦️THE ROYALS & THEIR TEAM ARE LACKING IN SELF ESTEEM if they’re worried, bothered and complaining about schedule clashes with Harry and Meghan in another country and appealing to a different audience. Saturday morning comment piece over. 🙂

Glow Lee

147,431 次观看 • 2 年前

the camera being in a tight close up on both ilya and shane for the entirety of this scene, except for the moment when ilya is working up the courage to say he’s in love. it’s like for the whole conversation it’s just the two of them, there’s nobody else who matters, and then for a brief moment the shot widens as ilya considers the implications of the fact he’s in love with shane. the fact that the rest of the world DOES matter and will always be a presence in their relationship. we’ve been held in this moment between the two of them and by widening the shot, that intimacy is broken just for a second as we’re reminded that there is a world beyond the two of them and ilya is still in russia. what he’s doing is incredibly dangerous. then the camera tightens back into a close up as he realises he needs to say it anyway because all that matters is that he’s on the phone with shane and he’s in love with him. it really is just the two of them in this moment and he doesn’t want to let anyone else in.

the camera being in a tight close up on both ilya and shane for the entirety of this scene, except for the moment when ilya is working up the courage to say he’s in love. it’s like for the whole conversation it’s just the two of them, there’s nobody else who matters, and then for a brief moment the shot widens as ilya considers the implications of the fact he’s in love with shane. the fact that the rest of the world DOES matter and will always be a presence in their relationship. we’ve been held in this moment between the two of them and by widening the shot, that intimacy is broken just for a second as we’re reminded that there is a world beyond the two of them and ilya is still in russia. what he’s doing is incredibly dangerous. then the camera tightens back into a close up as he realises he needs to say it anyway because all that matters is that he’s on the phone with shane and he’s in love with him. it really is just the two of them in this moment and he doesn’t want to let anyone else in.

frances 🏒

294,736 次观看 • 9 个月前

🗣️ Mikel Arteta on Dowman’s work off the ball “I'm glad you are talking about that, because that's a big part of the game as well, and he really wants to do it. “The more he plays, the more he trains with us, and the more ready he is physically to sustain that level, he will do it. “That will help him in his attacking phase for sure, because he will force errors and mistakes from the opponent, and he will then be in a really open situation to exploit his qualities. “He knows that. Today is a big example for him as well, and I'm sure that's going to trigger even more will for him to do it.”

🗣️ Mikel Arteta on Dowman’s work off the ball “I'm glad you are talking about that, because that's a big part of the game as well, and he really wants to do it. “The more he plays, the more he trains with us, and the more ready he is physically to sustain that level, he will do it. “That will help him in his attacking phase for sure, because he will force errors and mistakes from the opponent, and he will then be in a really open situation to exploit his qualities. “He knows that. Today is a big example for him as well, and I'm sure that's going to trigger even more will for him to do it.”

Connor Humm

15,423 次观看 • 1 天前

ROYAL CORRESPONDENT TOM SYKES IS READY WITH PRE WRITTEN NARRATIVES ON PRINCE HARRY & MEGHAN DURING THEIR UK STAY Tom Sykes cannot contain his excitement that Harry and Meghan will be living in UK soil and his comments here show that him and his peers ♦️always wanted H&M in the Uk as proximity to abuse and make up stories that aren’t actually true is much easier. ♦️They have pre set narratives ready to run with regardless of reality. For instances, there may be no contact or they may be cordiality between them with other family members but Tom is ready to write about sensational conflict. No doubt this will be based based on ‘anonymous’ (made up) sources or a ‘friend of William’s 🙄. ♦️Royal reporters pretend Prince Harry ’trashed’ his family and that they did nothing bad to prompt him speaking out (eventually) and they also then pretend to want the family to reconcile but they actually love and want the conflict amped up by then to continue. It’s profitable and more thrilling, patriotic and rewarding for them to casting H&M as villains against the innocent monarchy. #HarryAndMeghanUkReturn

ROYAL CORRESPONDENT TOM SYKES IS READY WITH PRE WRITTEN NARRATIVES ON PRINCE HARRY & MEGHAN DURING THEIR UK STAY Tom Sykes cannot contain his excitement that Harry and Meghan will be living in UK soil and his comments here show that him and his peers ♦️always wanted H&M in the Uk as proximity to abuse and make up stories that aren’t actually true is much easier. ♦️They have pre set narratives ready to run with regardless of reality. For instances, there may be no contact or they may be cordiality between them with other family members but Tom is ready to write about sensational conflict. No doubt this will be based based on ‘anonymous’ (made up) sources or a ‘friend of William’s 🙄. ♦️Royal reporters pretend Prince Harry ’trashed’ his family and that they did nothing bad to prompt him speaking out (eventually) and they also then pretend to want the family to reconcile but they actually love and want the conflict amped up by then to continue. It’s profitable and more thrilling, patriotic and rewarding for them to casting H&M as villains against the innocent monarchy. #HarryAndMeghanUkReturn

Glow Lee

32,447 次观看 • 25 天前

Has Prince Harry been humiliated by the Buckingham Palace saga? Prince Harry will not be staying at Buckingham Palace this week, despite reports that he would be. The Duke of Sussex had initially declined the invite, but changed his mind and accepted the offer to stay at the royal residence. A spokesperson for the Duke of Sussex said: "Following RAVEC’s decision not to provide security for his family, the Duke spent last week making alternative security arrangements. Once those arrangements were in place, he was able to formally accept the offer of accommodation for himself over the weekend.” The duke had been waiting for a review by the Risk Management Board (RMB), part of the process by which Ravec rules on his security requirements, but found out on Friday this has yet to take place. A government spokesperson said: “The UK Government’s protective security system is rigorous and proportionate. It is our long-standing policy not to provide detailed information on those arrangements, as doing so could compromise their integrity and affect individuals’ security.” #princeharry #royalfamily

Has Prince Harry been humiliated by the Buckingham Palace saga? Prince Harry will not be staying at Buckingham Palace this week, despite reports that he would be. The Duke of Sussex had initially declined the invite, but changed his mind and accepted the offer to stay at the royal residence. A spokesperson for the Duke of Sussex said: "Following RAVEC’s decision not to provide security for his family, the Duke spent last week making alternative security arrangements. Once those arrangements were in place, he was able to formally accept the offer of accommodation for himself over the weekend.” The duke had been waiting for a review by the Risk Management Board (RMB), part of the process by which Ravec rules on his security requirements, but found out on Friday this has yet to take place. A government spokesperson said: “The UK Government’s protective security system is rigorous and proportionate. It is our long-standing policy not to provide detailed information on those arrangements, as doing so could compromise their integrity and affect individuals’ security.” #princeharry #royalfamily

Good Morning Britain

32,137 次观看 • 2 个月前

Here’s the entire conversation where #MeghanMarkle lied about Archie’s title & security. She keeps talking about the “George Convention” which is NOT A THING. She’s referring to the 1917 Letters Parent-you’d think she’d at least get the thing affecting her right. She’s lying about Archie not getting a title because they felt like it, she’s lying about the title “Prince” automatically entitling you to state funded security. That privilege depends on working Royal status and place in LoS. Archie wasn’t a working Royal, and was far enough down in the LoS. He would have had the benefit of his parents security. Princess Anne’s children Zara and Peter? They didn’t have taxpayer funded security. They were grandchildren of the Monarch. Lady Louise and James, Earl of Wessex didn’t either. What she’s referring to when she says he’s not titled in the way “other grandchildren” are, she’s referring to the Wales children. Forgetting that they are NOT THE SAME. They are the children of the Heir to the Throne, and #HarryandMeghan’s children will NEVER be equal. That’s what the whole title shit was about-they wanted Archie to have what William & Catherine’s children had-titles, security-but she married the Spare, and it is NOT the same. Nobody told her “we don’t want Archie to be a Prince”. That didn’t happen. And when she says they wanted to “change the Convention for Archie” what does that mean? She’s making shit up. The level of deceit and flat out lying is astonishing. #HarryandMeghan #MeghanMarkleisaLiar

Here’s the entire conversation where #MeghanMarkle lied about Archie’s title & security. She keeps talking about the “George Convention” which is NOT A THING. She’s referring to the 1917 Letters Parent-you’d think she’d at least get the thing affecting her right. She’s lying about Archie not getting a title because they felt like it, she’s lying about the title “Prince” automatically entitling you to state funded security. That privilege depends on working Royal status and place in LoS. Archie wasn’t a working Royal, and was far enough down in the LoS. He would have had the benefit of his parents security. Princess Anne’s children Zara and Peter? They didn’t have taxpayer funded security. They were grandchildren of the Monarch. Lady Louise and James, Earl of Wessex didn’t either. What she’s referring to when she says he’s not titled in the way “other grandchildren” are, she’s referring to the Wales children. Forgetting that they are NOT THE SAME. They are the children of the Heir to the Throne, and #HarryandMeghan’s children will NEVER be equal. That’s what the whole title shit was about-they wanted Archie to have what William & Catherine’s children had-titles, security-but she married the Spare, and it is NOT the same. Nobody told her “we don’t want Archie to be a Prince”. That didn’t happen. And when she says they wanted to “change the Convention for Archie” what does that mean? She’s making shit up. The level of deceit and flat out lying is astonishing. #HarryandMeghan #MeghanMarkleisaLiar

Princess CarParkle 👑

159,852 次观看 • 11 个月前