Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

And yet again, why Dhanush needs to be celebrated more is because #Dhanush is the ONLY STAR who’s not hesitant to play Vulnerable, Flawed, Next door protagonist roles!! உண்மைலயே தமிழ் industry க்கு இன்னைக்கு தேதில கிடைச்ச ஒரு “பாறைல பூத்த செடி” அப்டினா அது தனுஷ் தான்..💙

69,032 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

2 Yorum

Pulasulaaki profil fotoğrafı
Pulasulaaki5 ay önce

@dhanushkraja மாஸ் வொர்க் அவுட் ஆகல. ஓப்பனிங்கும் ஆவரேஜ், வேற வழி இல்ல.

Sandhya Emmanuel profil fotoğrafı
Sandhya Emmanuel5 ay önce

@dhanushkraja I feel even VJS does that.

Benzer Videolar

Interesting argument. If we were to steel man this and represent it as a syllogism I think it would look like this: 1. God is perfect 2. A perfect being would only create perfect things 3. The world is imperfect 4. Therefore, a perfect God could not have created this world ...And then we'd further conclude a perfect God doesn't exist. The problem is with premise two, for a number of reasons. Firstly, what does it mean to be perfect? To be perfect is to lack for nothing, to be without flaws, to be fully actualized. But only God is like that, so the only way for God to make something perfect would be to make another God exactly like Himself. But there's a problem with this because the second God couldn't be exactly the same since he had to be created, rather than simply existing by his very nature. So logically speaking God can't create something perfect. This means that if* God creates, God can only create things that are imperfect. So now that we've established that God can't make something perfect, I guess the question is... why would God create? Here's a thought. Ontologically speaking God is the greatest conceivable being... would the greatest conceivable being create things? Or not create things? It seems obvious that creating is greater than not creating. An artist that creates no art wouldn't be much of an artist. If this is correct, it means God will create, and from my first argument God will create something imperfect... something flawed. Something lacking. Another thing worth pointing out is that as humans we knowingly create imperfect beings. We know when a baby is born, it's not perfect... yet we choose to do it anyway. Why? Is our desire to bring new life into the world something evil or wicked? I don't think so. I think it comes from our love for each other and our understanding that giving life is a blessing, even if that child screws up, even if they suffer, their life is a blessing. If God is good, wouldn't He want to bless something with the gift of life, the same way we do? I don't see why not. From this I think it follows that if God exists we'd expect to be in some sort of imperfect or flawed reality, and that's exactly what we find ourselves in. But how does atheism explain the existence of a flawed world? To say that something is flawed is to say it's not how it should be. But how can the world be flawed if atheism is true? On atheism the world just... is. It's not meant to be any sort of way. To be consistent the atheist would have to say reality isn't flawed, which is obviously absurd. This means that not only can Christianity explain the world we find ourselves in, it predicts it logically. Atheism on the other hand would have to predict a totally neutral world with no flaws, no issues, no evil... and no one in their right mind would say that's the world we find ourselves in. So this argument not only fails, it gives us more great reasons to reject atheism.

Darwin to Jesus

57,850 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce