正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

.Andy Cohen Cohen has a pattern: Align with whoever keeps him palatable to the loudest outsiders. One minute he’s “neutral,” the next he’s dogpiling to protect a brand image. He’s done this for years on reunions and Watch What Happens Live! There’s a reason so many people on Andy... Cohen’s shows look tense at reunions. You can’t be open when you don’t trust the referee. This past season of #RHOC people noticed how a woman like Gretchen Rossi, pushed rhetoric many view as homophobic and transphobic in the years after Covid, was quietly ignored, while Tamra Judge became the convenient villain. That didn’t happen by accident. It was enabled by Andy Cohen’s silence and support. So this is the line, Nicki Minaj not aligning with the ‘right’ administration? Another figure whose credibility has steadily declined in recent years.show more

Cam ✨

1,845 subscribers

127,397 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

艺术新闻政治

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Kelly Dodd gets so triggered by her former #RHOC castmates. She went on a rant after claiming Shannon was upset that she had to pay the $500 bill at The Quiet Woman. Kelly argued that Shannon makes $1 million a year and Andy Cohen, who was also there, makes $20 million a year, asking, “Why are they looking for a free meal?” The problem is that Kelly doesn’t have the full story. Andy Cohen later addressed the situation on his radio show, explaining that he was given the bill, happily paid it, and left a generous tip. As he was leaving, the general manager told him the dinner was actually on The Quiet Woman and that they were going to tear up the bill. Andy said he didn’t want that to happen because he wanted the server to receive the tip. In the end, they worked everything out, so the situation wasn’t what Kelly made it out to be. #RHOC

Kelly Dodd gets so triggered by her former #RHOC castmates. She went on a rant after claiming Shannon was upset that she had to pay the $500 bill at The Quiet Woman. Kelly argued that Shannon makes $1 million a year and Andy Cohen, who was also there, makes $20 million a year, asking, “Why are they looking for a free meal?” The problem is that Kelly doesn’t have the full story. Andy Cohen later addressed the situation on his radio show, explaining that he was given the bill, happily paid it, and left a generous tip. As he was leaving, the general manager told him the dinner was actually on The Quiet Woman and that they were going to tear up the bill. Andy said he didn’t want that to happen because he wanted the server to receive the tip. In the end, they worked everything out, so the situation wasn’t what Kelly made it out to be. #RHOC

Bye Wig Hello Drama

92,233 次观看 • 1 个月前

There it is ladies and gents. The RF has taken no action against this man for what he’s done in the last six years and he’s telling people he is a member of that family and he’s doing the work that he is born to do… after the international incident with Putin and Trump that is..

There it is ladies and gents. The RF has taken no action against this man for what he’s done in the last six years and he’s telling people he is a member of that family and he’s doing the work that he is born to do… after the international incident with Putin and Trump that is..

Longsally AKA Sue Smith

46,410 次观看 • 3 个月前

Neil deGrasse Tyson called out the biggest plot hole in Project Hail Mary, and Andy Weir had to defend it live. Andy Weir: You and I are enemies now. Neil deGrasse Tyson: It was a stretch for me, as an academic, to completely embrace the idea that the entire world of biochemists is insufficient to handle this mission. And they need the one guy who has the expertise no one else has. And he’s a middle school chemistry teacher. Andy Weir: Right, so to be fair, he was a speculative xenobiologist, he’s a PhD astrobiologist, and he had done that, and then he’d left that field. He’d written papers. Neil deGrasse Tyson: But he wrote papers, so the papers are out there and other people are still active, and he’s no longer active. So why does he still become the guy? Andy Weir: Because he’s been part of the mission and the mission planning the whole time, so he understands all the other aspects of the mission as well. He knows all about the Hail Mary itself. Chuck Nice: And they don’t have time to train someone else up on all the other stuff. Andy Weir: And he’s as well trained as any of the other biologists need him to be in the field they need. Neil deGrasse Tyson: Okay, all right. He got out of that one. Andy Weir: I wriggled out of that one.

Neil deGrasse Tyson called out the biggest plot hole in Project Hail Mary, and Andy Weir had to defend it live. Andy Weir: You and I are enemies now. Neil deGrasse Tyson: It was a stretch for me, as an academic, to completely embrace the idea that the entire world of biochemists is insufficient to handle this mission. And they need the one guy who has the expertise no one else has. And he’s a middle school chemistry teacher. Andy Weir: Right, so to be fair, he was a speculative xenobiologist, he’s a PhD astrobiologist, and he had done that, and then he’d left that field. He’d written papers. Neil deGrasse Tyson: But he wrote papers, so the papers are out there and other people are still active, and he’s no longer active. So why does he still become the guy? Andy Weir: Because he’s been part of the mission and the mission planning the whole time, so he understands all the other aspects of the mission as well. He knows all about the Hail Mary itself. Chuck Nice: And they don’t have time to train someone else up on all the other stuff. Andy Weir: And he’s as well trained as any of the other biologists need him to be in the field they need. Neil deGrasse Tyson: Okay, all right. He got out of that one. Andy Weir: I wriggled out of that one.

BIG JOE 🧃

2,577,246 次观看 • 1 个月前

Megyn Kelly: “There are aspects of [President Trump’s] personality which are obviously not good and that we’ve mostly just chosen to overlook. He’s not a moral man, he’s obviously not the greatest husband in the world, and he’s extremely petty and thin-skinned. Extremely petty and thin-skinned.” “What we’re seeing right now is he’s turning on his most loyal supporters because they don’t support this war, and getting in bed with people who f*cking hate him and have hated him from the beginning, and were the original NeverTrumpers, as though that’s what MAGA is, that’s what his core support should look like.” “Meanwhile, there are many who are over here who have loved Trump for many, many years, we’ve had our skirmishes in the past, Tucker’s had skirmishes with him, I have too, but who fought harder than a lot of others during the lawfare against him to make sure people knew that it was bullsh*t and stood up for him during the actual electoral contest to make sure people understood what was at stake and why he had to be the choice.” “There’s no loyalty in return ever from Trump. Ever. If you have a principle disagreement with something he does, you’re otherized, you’re the enemy, and at this particular moment, he’s alienating so many of his core supporters, biggest believers, and boosters and running to people who have not been able to stand him for 10 years, like a Mark Levin or a Ben Shapiro, who actively was against Trump.” “Whatever. It is what is… But there’s still, in my view, a lot to like about Trump. It’s just some of those darker demons are much more in the front view right now.”

Megyn Kelly: “There are aspects of [President Trump’s] personality which are obviously not good and that we’ve mostly just chosen to overlook. He’s not a moral man, he’s obviously not the greatest husband in the world, and he’s extremely petty and thin-skinned. Extremely petty and thin-skinned.” “What we’re seeing right now is he’s turning on his most loyal supporters because they don’t support this war, and getting in bed with people who fcking hate him and have hated him from the beginning, and were the original NeverTrumpers, as though that’s what MAGA is, that’s what his core support should look like.” “Meanwhile, there are many who are over here who have loved Trump for many, many years, we’ve had our skirmishes in the past, Tucker’s had skirmishes with him, I have too, but who fought harder than a lot of others during the lawfare against him to make sure people knew that it was bullsht and stood up for him during the actual electoral contest to make sure people understood what was at stake and why he had to be the choice.” “There’s no loyalty in return ever from Trump. Ever. If you have a principle disagreement with something he does, you’re otherized, you’re the enemy, and at this particular moment, he’s alienating so many of his core supporters, biggest believers, and boosters and running to people who have not been able to stand him for 10 years, like a Mark Levin or a Ben Shapiro, who actively was against Trump.” “Whatever. It is what is… But there’s still, in my view, a lot to like about Trump. It’s just some of those darker demons are much more in the front view right now.”

RedWave Press

207,106 次观看 • 3 个月前

WOW! Did Larry David just wiped the floor with Donald Trump! Chris Wallace: “So how has the 2020 election — everything that has flowed from it — pissed you off?” Larry David: “You can’t go a day without thinking about what [Trump] has done to this country, because he’s such a little baby, that he’s thrown 250 years of democracy out of window by not accepting the results of the… I mean it’s so crazy. He’s such a sociopath. He’s so insane. He just couldn’t admit to losing. And we know he lost. He knows he lost, and look how he’s fooled everybody. He’s convinced all of these people that he didn’t lose. He’s such a sick man. He’s so sick.”

WOW! Did Larry David just wiped the floor with Donald Trump! Chris Wallace: “So how has the 2020 election — everything that has flowed from it — pissed you off?” Larry David: “You can’t go a day without thinking about what [Trump] has done to this country, because he’s such a little baby, that he’s thrown 250 years of democracy out of window by not accepting the results of the… I mean it’s so crazy. He’s such a sociopath. He’s so insane. He just couldn’t admit to losing. And we know he lost. He knows he lost, and look how he’s fooled everybody. He’s convinced all of these people that he didn’t lose. He’s such a sick man. He’s so sick.”

Ed Krassenstein

3,024,078 次观看 • 2 年前

Google Street View started as a project to scan the real world. Cars with cameras photographed streets to collect data. It worked, but everything that made a place feel like a place was gone. Until Andy Szybalski prototyped what it could feel like as a product designed for people. The prototype was completely fake. The map didn't work and the imagery wasn't real. But it let people feel what it was like to stand on the street. An engineer saw it and said "let's ship it." Andy had to explain there was nothing to ship. This "smoke and mirrors" prototype convinced the team to throw out years of work and rebuild Street View through the eye of a human instead of a machine. I talked with Andy about the whole story, including the prototypes, the key design decisions, and how Street View became one of the most beloved products on the internet. Full story (with more early prototypes) in the replies 👇

Google Street View started as a project to scan the real world. Cars with cameras photographed streets to collect data. It worked, but everything that made a place feel like a place was gone. Until Andy Szybalski prototyped what it could feel like as a product designed for people. The prototype was completely fake. The map didn't work and the imagery wasn't real. But it let people feel what it was like to stand on the street. An engineer saw it and said "let's ship it." Andy had to explain there was nothing to ship. This "smoke and mirrors" prototype convinced the team to throw out years of work and rebuild Street View through the eye of a human instead of a machine. I talked with Andy about the whole story, including the prototypes, the key design decisions, and how Street View became one of the most beloved products on the internet. Full story (with more early prototypes) in the replies 👇

Elizabeth Laraki

14,477 次观看 • 1 个月前

Jim Acosta: “What in the world is the president doing in so many photographs with Jeffrey Epstein? How long did it take for it to dawn on you that Jeffrey Epstein was a creep? This friendship went on for years and years. What are you doing hanging out with this guy so much?”

Jim Acosta: “What in the world is the president doing in so many photographs with Jeffrey Epstein? How long did it take for it to dawn on you that Jeffrey Epstein was a creep? This friendship went on for years and years. What are you doing hanging out with this guy so much?”

Marco Foster

169,410 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨 WOMAN WAS RESCUING SEAGULL, NOT STEALING IT A video I shared yesterday of a woman catching a seagull in a blanket, was Not what it looked like, the woman in question was actually concerned for the small seagull after it has fell off the roof previously, as you can see in this video that the woman in question shares with the seagull society on Facebook, she asked locals to help her it on to a flat roof so it could be back with its mother Like many people yesterday I saw the video shared round of her catching it and jumped to conclusions, for that I apologize and hold my hands up I was quick to judge

🚨 WOMAN WAS RESCUING SEAGULL, NOT STEALING IT A video I shared yesterday of a woman catching a seagull in a blanket, was Not what it looked like, the woman in question was actually concerned for the small seagull after it has fell off the roof previously, as you can see in this video that the woman in question shares with the seagull society on Facebook, she asked locals to help her it on to a flat roof so it could be back with its mother Like many people yesterday I saw the video shared round of her catching it and jumped to conclusions, for that I apologize and hold my hands up I was quick to judge

Active Patriot

1,019,099 次观看 • 1 个月前

#7 - Bill Maher delivers a brutal wake-up call to Democrats after the election. Reflecting on Kamala Harris’s last-ditch to captivate viewers on Saturday Night Live, Maher pointed out a major flaw with his party—a flaw so fatal that it makes it “not a good place for us to be.” “I saw Kamala was on Saturday Night Live, as the losing candidate often is… I’m sure every single member of the Saturday Night Live cast was a Harris supporter, but what if one of them wasn’t? What if one of those cast members was for Trump? Would they have felt comfortable saying so? I really don’t think so. They would have had to keep it to themselves. That’s not a good place for us to be.” “And that happens even more on the left. I remember when Elon Musk hosted. And this is well before he was a Trumper. This is three or four years ago. He was just the richest man in the world. And a number of the cast members on Saturday Night Live, like, they didn’t want to deal with him. “They didn’t exactly boycott, but they made it plain. And I was thinking, really, you have Elon Musk on your show for a week. You could talk to one of the most interesting, brilliant people the world has ever produced, even about this issue that bothers you so much—that he’s so rich and lots of people aren’t. But no, you don’t want to even deal with him. “That’s what I hate about the left. You’re brats. You’re brats, and you’re snobs, and people don’t like that.”

#7 - Bill Maher delivers a brutal wake-up call to Democrats after the election. Reflecting on Kamala Harris’s last-ditch to captivate viewers on Saturday Night Live, Maher pointed out a major flaw with his party—a flaw so fatal that it makes it “not a good place for us to be.” “I saw Kamala was on Saturday Night Live, as the losing candidate often is… I’m sure every single member of the Saturday Night Live cast was a Harris supporter, but what if one of them wasn’t? What if one of those cast members was for Trump? Would they have felt comfortable saying so? I really don’t think so. They would have had to keep it to themselves. That’s not a good place for us to be.” “And that happens even more on the left. I remember when Elon Musk hosted. And this is well before he was a Trumper. This is three or four years ago. He was just the richest man in the world. And a number of the cast members on Saturday Night Live, like, they didn’t want to deal with him. “They didn’t exactly boycott, but they made it plain. And I was thinking, really, you have Elon Musk on your show for a week. You could talk to one of the most interesting, brilliant people the world has ever produced, even about this issue that bothers you so much—that he’s so rich and lots of people aren’t. But no, you don’t want to even deal with him. “That’s what I hate about the left. You’re brats. You’re brats, and you’re snobs, and people don’t like that.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

178,222 次观看 • 1 年前

Shapiro: When you have a president who is focused on making money for himself, that corruption leaves us all worse off because it means he’s picking favorites not based on what benefits the American people, but on what benefits him and his children. He’s picking sides in battles that ultimately are un-American because he’s putting his own profiteering ahead of the needs of the American people. That’s point one: his corruption has a real cost to the American people. Point two, though, is that what he’s doing seemingly is totally protected because the Supreme Court of the United States made one of its worst decisions, really over the last century, to give this president absolute and total immunity. And so he feels like he can do anything. So while he sits in that gilded Oval Office, he’s not focused on solving your problems, getting you health care, putting a roof over your head, or driving down your costs. Instead, he’s focused on trying to figure out how he can make a buck for himself and his family. And that is at odds with meeting the needs of the American people. So the first thing is his corruption has a cost to you, and the second thing is his corruption has been enabled by this Supreme Court, which has given him absolute and total immunity. That’s why we need real reform. That’s why we need anti-corruption laws at the federal level. I could make an argument that we need a 28th Amendment to our Constitution to bake in some stricter guardrails to protect the American people from a president of the United States who lacks integrity, ethics, and honor the way this president does. I think everything needs to be on the table. We need real reform.

Shapiro: When you have a president who is focused on making money for himself, that corruption leaves us all worse off because it means he’s picking favorites not based on what benefits the American people, but on what benefits him and his children. He’s picking sides in battles that ultimately are un-American because he’s putting his own profiteering ahead of the needs of the American people. That’s point one: his corruption has a real cost to the American people. Point two, though, is that what he’s doing seemingly is totally protected because the Supreme Court of the United States made one of its worst decisions, really over the last century, to give this president absolute and total immunity. And so he feels like he can do anything. So while he sits in that gilded Oval Office, he’s not focused on solving your problems, getting you health care, putting a roof over your head, or driving down your costs. Instead, he’s focused on trying to figure out how he can make a buck for himself and his family. And that is at odds with meeting the needs of the American people. So the first thing is his corruption has a cost to you, and the second thing is his corruption has been enabled by this Supreme Court, which has given him absolute and total immunity. That’s why we need real reform. That’s why we need anti-corruption laws at the federal level. I could make an argument that we need a 28th Amendment to our Constitution to bake in some stricter guardrails to protect the American people from a president of the United States who lacks integrity, ethics, and honor the way this president does. I think everything needs to be on the table. We need real reform.

Acyn

64,916 次观看 • 1 个月前

Must Watch: Did You Know? In 1976, An Emergency Vaccine Was Pushed On The USA For An Imaginary Pandemic: As a result of this, American citizens were injured and even killed. This video serves as powerful reminder that tactics used in recent years with COVID vaccines have been around for many years. It feels like society is at a point where people have lost faith in institutions that were previously viewed as being trustworthy. If people were properly informed, how many would’ve refused the shots? This is a longer clip so consider playing it on 1.25X speed or bookmarking it for later if you’re short on time.

Must Watch: Did You Know? In 1976, An Emergency Vaccine Was Pushed On The USA For An Imaginary Pandemic: As a result of this, American citizens were injured and even killed. This video serves as powerful reminder that tactics used in recent years with COVID vaccines have been around for many years. It feels like society is at a point where people have lost faith in institutions that were previously viewed as being trustworthy. If people were properly informed, how many would’ve refused the shots? This is a longer clip so consider playing it on 1.25X speed or bookmarking it for later if you’re short on time.

Blake

259,680 次观看 • 2 年前

Bill Maher Delivers a Brutal Wake-Up Call to Democrats, Exposing One of Their Biggest Problems “You’re brats, and you’re snobs, and people don’t like that.” “I saw Kamala was on Saturday Night Live, as the losing candidate often is... I’m sure every single member of the Saturday Night Live cast was a Harris supporter, but what if one of them wasn’t? What if one of those cast members was for Trump? Would they have felt comfortable saying so? I really don’t think so. They would have had to keep it to themselves. That’s not a good place for us to be.” “And that happens even more on the left. I remember when Elon Musk hosted. And this is well before he was a Trumper. This is three or four years ago. He was just the richest man in the world. And a number of the cast members on Saturday Night Live, like, they didn’t want to deal with him. “They didn’t exactly boycott, but they made it plain. And I was thinking, really, you have Elon Musk on your show for a week. You could talk to one of the most interesting, brilliant people the world has ever produced, even about this issue that bothers you so much—that he’s so rich and lots of people aren’t. But no, you don’t want to even deal with him. “That’s what I hate about the left. You’re brats. You’re brats, and you’re snobs, and people don’t like that.”

Bill Maher Delivers a Brutal Wake-Up Call to Democrats, Exposing One of Their Biggest Problems “You’re brats, and you’re snobs, and people don’t like that.” “I saw Kamala was on Saturday Night Live, as the losing candidate often is... I’m sure every single member of the Saturday Night Live cast was a Harris supporter, but what if one of them wasn’t? What if one of those cast members was for Trump? Would they have felt comfortable saying so? I really don’t think so. They would have had to keep it to themselves. That’s not a good place for us to be.” “And that happens even more on the left. I remember when Elon Musk hosted. And this is well before he was a Trumper. This is three or four years ago. He was just the richest man in the world. And a number of the cast members on Saturday Night Live, like, they didn’t want to deal with him. “They didn’t exactly boycott, but they made it plain. And I was thinking, really, you have Elon Musk on your show for a week. You could talk to one of the most interesting, brilliant people the world has ever produced, even about this issue that bothers you so much—that he’s so rich and lots of people aren’t. But no, you don’t want to even deal with him. “That’s what I hate about the left. You’re brats. You’re brats, and you’re snobs, and people don’t like that.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

4,635,664 次观看 • 1 年前

Bill O’Reilly CALLS for Jimmy Kimmel to be FIRED and asks Disney the question everyone is thinking. “Why are you doing this? For what?! You’re not making money off Kimmel.” He said there’s not a single good reason for Kimmel to still be on the air. O’REILLY: “Well, he shouldn’t be on the air, of course.” “He’s not a comedian. He’s not a satirist. He’s there to hate President Trump. Disney knows that.” “But Disney runs a couple operations like The View, that’s all I do is hate Trump.” “You know, the First Amendment protects them. We can’t...we the people can haul him off the air. But there’s no reason for Jimmy Kimmel be on there.” “What the reason? I don’t understand.” “It’s not entertainment. All he’s trying to do is damage the President of the United States and the office of the presidency and goes after Melania Trump saying going to be a widow.” “So my question is to Disney — why are you doing this?” “For what?! You’re not making money off Kimmel, very few people watch him.” “You polarizing a whole country, people take it out on you and your revenue goes down.” “Why are you doing this?”

Bill O’Reilly CALLS for Jimmy Kimmel to be FIRED and asks Disney the question everyone is thinking. “Why are you doing this? For what?! You’re not making money off Kimmel.” He said there’s not a single good reason for Kimmel to still be on the air. O’REILLY: “Well, he shouldn’t be on the air, of course.” “He’s not a comedian. He’s not a satirist. He’s there to hate President Trump. Disney knows that.” “But Disney runs a couple operations like The View, that’s all I do is hate Trump.” “You know, the First Amendment protects them. We can’t...we the people can haul him off the air. But there’s no reason for Jimmy Kimmel be on there.” “What the reason? I don’t understand.” “It’s not entertainment. All he’s trying to do is damage the President of the United States and the office of the presidency and goes after Melania Trump saying going to be a widow.” “So my question is to Disney — why are you doing this?” “For what?! You’re not making money off Kimmel, very few people watch him.” “You polarizing a whole country, people take it out on you and your revenue goes down.” “Why are you doing this?”

Overton

129,778 次观看 • 3 个月前

⁨This is Zach, he was 14 years old when speaking at a protest for Palestine in London last year. He’s not corrupted by mainstream media and he speaks with a clarity many politicians have lost. This is a glimpse of a generation that refuses to look away as teenagers have stopped waiting for permission to understand the world.⁩

⁨This is Zach, he was 14 years old when speaking at a protest for Palestine in London last year. He’s not corrupted by mainstream media and he speaks with a clarity many politicians have lost. This is a glimpse of a generation that refuses to look away as teenagers have stopped waiting for permission to understand the world.⁩

Save Our Citizenships 🔻

11,928 次观看 • 2 个月前

“If only people had predicted that this would happen…” GregGutfeld calls out Democrats and the liberal media for four years of silence on the border, followed by round-the-clock coverage of ICE “If it wasn’t for your malfeasance on the border we wouldn’t be in this situation. So this is on the Dems, it’s not on ICE. If only people had predicted that this would happen… Oh yeah, it was Bill Melugin. It was the years that FOX did this coverage on the border that NO ONE else did in the media. They’re now covering it WALL to WALL. They didn’t do a damn thing before!”

“If only people had predicted that this would happen…” GregGutfeld calls out Democrats and the liberal media for four years of silence on the border, followed by round-the-clock coverage of ICE “If it wasn’t for your malfeasance on the border we wouldn’t be in this situation. So this is on the Dems, it’s not on ICE. If only people had predicted that this would happen… Oh yeah, it was Bill Melugin. It was the years that FOX did this coverage on the border that NO ONE else did in the media. They’re now covering it WALL to WALL. They didn’t do a damn thing before!”

The Five

67,827 次观看 • 6 个月前

.Peter Meijer on Graham Platner: “Well, the idea too, that — ‘well, he’s — he’s — he’s taking responsibility for his actions, he’s transformed.’ I mean, the allegations of texting multiple women while he’s in a relationship and cheating on his wife — I mean, those are within the last year. His Kik profile is still active. He’s changed the profile picture. But this isn’t, ‘oh, this was 15 years ago. I was going through a rough patch.’ And by the way, as a military veteran, I really resent him using post-traumatic stress as an excuse for things that are just vile behavior. Like you — yes, sure, you were in a dark time. You were getting drunk. But the idea, and I’ve heard this repeated by some elected officials too that, ‘oh, well, you know, he’s like any other military veteran., No. Absolutely not. I — that is not reflective of the veterans community. That’s not reflective of people I know. And that idea that there’s a conflation. And then that’s a reason to excuse vile behavior. It’s disgusting.”

Curtis Houck

84,409 次观看 • 2 个月前

Actor sudhir pandey who played Akshay Kumar's father's role in the toilet movie was brutally ignored by the co-actors and paps during ginny weds sunny 2 trailer launch. Feeling saddened by this, he quietly left the stage. For how long will outsiders be humiliated? This is very shameful. Atleast Respect a good artist. Similarly Rakesh Bedi was ignored for so many years and after Dhurandhar, Now everyone wants an interview with him. The growing influence of South industry has weakened the Urduwood lobby but their arrogance has still not diminished.

Actor sudhir pandey who played Akshay Kumar's father's role in the toilet movie was brutally ignored by the co-actors and paps during ginny weds sunny 2 trailer launch. Feeling saddened by this, he quietly left the stage. For how long will outsiders be humiliated? This is very shameful. Atleast Respect a good artist. Similarly Rakesh Bedi was ignored for so many years and after Dhurandhar, Now everyone wants an interview with him. The growing influence of South industry has weakened the Urduwood lobby but their arrogance has still not diminished.

Mr SP

1,395,790 次观看 • 4 个月前

A Real New Yorker for New Yorkers: Curtis Sliwa Still Fighting for the City He Loves As usual, while I was out on the streets talking to people — including NYPD officers — the topic of the day was the New York City elections. When I mentioned Curtis Sliwa, the reactions were all the same: people lit up. They told me they support him because he understands this city in ways most politicians never could. Many said after the debate, they saw a different side of him — someone who truly knows the streets of New York and what they’ve become. I also spent some time with Curtis yesterday at the Halloween Parade, and one thing really stood out — he stopped for everyone. And I don’t mean just a few blocks. Curtis walked the entire parade route, shaking hands, taking photos, and talking to anyone who wanted a moment with him. You could see the respect and love people had for him — families, kids, and long-time New Yorkers alike. It wasn’t just a photo-op; it was Curtis being Curtis. This really highlights the disconnect between what the mainstream polls are showing and what the streets are actually saying. Out here, people are telling me they want Curtis. You can feel the support, you can see it in how people react to him. But the media keeps pushing a different story — one that doesn’t reflect the energy and the voices echoing across this city. Myself, as a native New Yorker who’s lived here for over 40 years, I know a b******* artist when I see one. I understand people — their tone, their movement, their energy — and I can spot the fake ones from a mile away. Now, look — nobody’s perfect. People do stupid things sometimes, and Curtis is no exception. He’s pulled off a few stunts in the past that made people shake their heads or laugh, maybe even question him. But that’s part of who he is — raw, unfiltered, and human. Sometimes people act out to get attention, but in his case, it always came from a place of caring about the city and trying to wake people up. That’s the difference. Curtis might have done things that looked crazy, but his heart’s always been in the right place. He’s real. He’s not a politician — he’s a regular guy who truly wants to save this city and have honest conversations with real New Yorkers. Some people say Curtis is a little crazy — s***, we’re all a little crazy. The man got shot multiple times trying to protect these same streets. Of course he’s going to be a little different. We’ve all seen a lot. Me, being in the line of work I’m in, I’ve seen things I didn’t want to see — things I never signed up to see. Did it make me a little crazy? Absolutely. It changes the way you look at life, at people, and at this city. Let’s not forget, Curtis founded The Marvelous 13 back in 1979 — a small group that later evolved into the now world-famous Guardian Angels. That was the start of a lifelong mission to protect and serve New Yorkers, and he’s been doing it ever since. For over 45 years, Curtis has stood up for the city when few others would. Now, at his age, this is most likely his last run for New York City Mayor, and you can see he’s giving it everything he’s got. Whether he’s walking a parade route, visiting neighborhoods most politicians avoid, or talking directly to everyday New Yorkers, Curtis is still doing what he’s always done — showing up. After so many years putting his life and energy into protecting New Yorkers, the city owes him respect, and voters owe him a fair shot at leading this city the way he’s been fighting to protect it for decades. That’s what makes him different. He’s not trying to be perfect — he’s trying to be real. And in a city that’s seen it all, that’s exactly what people are looking for. By Leeroy Johnson For licensing email viralnewsnyc@gmail.com

A Real New Yorker for New Yorkers: Curtis Sliwa Still Fighting for the City He Loves As usual, while I was out on the streets talking to people — including NYPD officers — the topic of the day was the New York City elections. When I mentioned Curtis Sliwa, the reactions were all the same: people lit up. They told me they support him because he understands this city in ways most politicians never could. Many said after the debate, they saw a different side of him — someone who truly knows the streets of New York and what they’ve become. I also spent some time with Curtis yesterday at the Halloween Parade, and one thing really stood out — he stopped for everyone. And I don’t mean just a few blocks. Curtis walked the entire parade route, shaking hands, taking photos, and talking to anyone who wanted a moment with him. You could see the respect and love people had for him — families, kids, and long-time New Yorkers alike. It wasn’t just a photo-op; it was Curtis being Curtis. This really highlights the disconnect between what the mainstream polls are showing and what the streets are actually saying. Out here, people are telling me they want Curtis. You can feel the support, you can see it in how people react to him. But the media keeps pushing a different story — one that doesn’t reflect the energy and the voices echoing across this city. Myself, as a native New Yorker who’s lived here for over 40 years, I know a b***** artist when I see one. I understand people — their tone, their movement, their energy — and I can spot the fake ones from a mile away. Now, look — nobody’s perfect. People do stupid things sometimes, and Curtis is no exception. He’s pulled off a few stunts in the past that made people shake their heads or laugh, maybe even question him. But that’s part of who he is — raw, unfiltered, and human. Sometimes people act out to get attention, but in his case, it always came from a place of caring about the city and trying to wake people up. That’s the difference. Curtis might have done things that looked crazy, but his heart’s always been in the right place. He’s real. He’s not a politician — he’s a regular guy who truly wants to save this city and have honest conversations with real New Yorkers. Some people say Curtis is a little crazy — s*, we’re all a little crazy. The man got shot multiple times trying to protect these same streets. Of course he’s going to be a little different. We’ve all seen a lot. Me, being in the line of work I’m in, I’ve seen things I didn’t want to see — things I never signed up to see. Did it make me a little crazy? Absolutely. It changes the way you look at life, at people, and at this city. Let’s not forget, Curtis founded The Marvelous 13 back in 1979 — a small group that later evolved into the now world-famous Guardian Angels. That was the start of a lifelong mission to protect and serve New Yorkers, and he’s been doing it ever since. For over 45 years, Curtis has stood up for the city when few others would. Now, at his age, this is most likely his last run for New York City Mayor, and you can see he’s giving it everything he’s got. Whether he’s walking a parade route, visiting neighborhoods most politicians avoid, or talking directly to everyday New Yorkers, Curtis is still doing what he’s always done — showing up. After so many years putting his life and energy into protecting New Yorkers, the city owes him respect, and voters owe him a fair shot at leading this city the way he’s been fighting to protect it for decades. That’s what makes him different. He’s not trying to be perfect — he’s trying to be real. And in a city that’s seen it all, that’s exactly what people are looking for. By Leeroy Johnson For licensing email [email protected]

Viral News NYC

78,182 次观看 • 9 个月前

🚨 ✅ Bridget Phillipson make a good point on Andy Burnham (responding to McSweeney’s claim Labour wasn’t ready to govern after 4 years): “Andy Burnham has been in Cabinet previously. He’s held a number of roles. He’s been an MP before. He actually has more experience of governing than many of us did when we entered government for the very first time as ministers in 2024.” Unlike Andy Burnham, who has real Cabinet and parliamentary experience, neither Starmer nor McSweeney had ever held office while Labour were in power. Starmer then sacked Sue Gray, the one senior figure who actually knew how government worked and their attempt to rule with iron fist failed spectacularly. The inexperience at the top has been glaring.

🚨 ✅ Bridget Phillipson make a good point on Andy Burnham (responding to McSweeney’s claim Labour wasn’t ready to govern after 4 years): “Andy Burnham has been in Cabinet previously. He’s held a number of roles. He’s been an MP before. He actually has more experience of governing than many of us did when we entered government for the very first time as ministers in 2024.” Unlike Andy Burnham, who has real Cabinet and parliamentary experience, neither Starmer nor McSweeney had ever held office while Labour were in power. Starmer then sacked Sue Gray, the one senior figure who actually knew how government worked and their attempt to rule with iron fist failed spectacularly. The inexperience at the top has been glaring.

Liz Webster

40,438 次观看 • 1 个月前