Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Angela White has said that cameramen sometimes get erections while shooting her scenes. She added that a cameraman can join in if he has been tested and everyone involved consents. “You have to be tested. I get tested about every 12–13 days, so if the cameraman was tested and...

991,238 次观看 • 12 天前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Q: is it true that Love only eats one bite and then gives the rest to P’Milk? #MilkLoveFancon #มิ้ลค์เลิฟ #MilkLove P’Milk said that she used to finish all the leftovers herself, but she can’t do that anymore. Luckily, she has a new manager who helps her out, so she can share the food with others now. Cuz if she eats all of it, she has to work out a lot just to burn it off. 💚: N’Love says she eats a lot. And yeah, i won’t deny that. She does eat A LOT, but she eats lots of different things, just a little bit of each. 🎤: Anything you want to say in your defense? 💖: 😹 Nothing. I just like trying a lot of different things. I mean, i like having a variety of food, but if i tried to finish everything, it would just be too much. I wouldn’t be able to eat it all. So i just eat enough to get the taste. If it tastes good, ok, i’m satisfied then. (P’Milk mentioned that Namtan is the same way.) 💖: Hey, but i have to say, i don’t ask P’Milk to help me finish my food every single time. Sometimes i feel bad asking her. Sometimes there are only the two of us on set, and it’s like she already knows what to do. She’ll be like, “You’re not eating anymore, right? Ok, Phi will help you finish it.” It’s like she already knows i definitely won’t be able to finish it. 💚: Yeah, cuz i already know. 💖: She was like, “Then Phi won’t take any more. Phi will just eat this.” And it’s not even really leftovers! We’re just sharing the food. 💚: i think it’s… 💖: it’s like we each have things we want to eat. If i ask P’Milk, “Do you want to eat this?” and she says no, then ok, we just won’t eat it. 💚: Let me go back to the whole “leftovers” thing for a second. I think it depends on how you look at it. Sometimes someone on set has already scooped some food onto her plate, and if we don’t eat it, we feel bad. So sometimes i’ll just eat it for her. Let’s say when it comes to food, we’re like really close friends who can even drink from the same straw.

sᴀᴘᴘʜᴏʀɪᴀ 💫

21,713 次观看 • 9 天前

“I can’t speak on whether he was close to converting…I do think from what I’ve been told that he was planning on signing up and starting that process [of becoming Catholic]. But I did not personally have that conversation with him…” A few things: Candace says she can’t speak on whether Charlie was close to converting to Catholicism—and then immediately goes on to speak about how she thinks he was close to converting. 🙄 Additionally, the first time she ever spoke about this (September 15th, see the 2nd clip below) she suggested he was close to converting. Because it’s Candace, she didn’t come right out and say, but she said he “was on the verge of changing some of his beliefs” and then went on to speak about how he was praying the rosary and attending mass. She also referenced him “taking that last step.” All of those things paired together imply (again without outright saying) he was close to converting. She also said in the same episode he was “too smart to be Protestant.” Mind you, this was FIVE DAYS after Charlie had been murdered. Charlie’s parents are Protestant. His wife was raised Catholic but is now Protestant. And whether you think he was close to converting or not, Charlie died Protestant. Her saying that FIVE DAYS after his murder was callous and tone deaf. This is how Candace makes things always and all about herself. This was in fact the first thing that clued me in that something was seriously wrong, after previously being her fan. Today, she doubled down on her implications that Charlie was close to converting (even though again she’d just said she couldn’t speak on that). She said she and Charlie were having conversations about it, but the only evidence she’s ever presented is a single vague text allegedly from him and dated February 2024. The problem is that Charlie went on to reiterate he was evangelical and all of his issues with the Catholic faith this year, in the months leading up to his death. Indeed, one of the final things he said on this earth the day he died was that he was evangelical. So even if he sent that text to Candace in February of 2024, it’s clear he wasn’t that convicted and that she read more into it than was actually meant. Because again, this year, in 2025, he was reaffirming his evangelical faith. Lastly, Candace admitted today that she heard from someone else that Charlie was becoming Catholic (likely Bishop Joseph Brennan). But if she and Charlie were already having conversations about the possibility of him converting (as she claims they were), why wouldn’t he tell Candace directly? Especially when again they allegedly were already having conversations about it? Please listen to what this woman actually says from one month, one week, one day to the next. And parse it out. Hear what she’s saying and also what she’s not saying. Determine what she’s implying. Compare herself to herself. And see if she makes sense to you, if she provides clarity to you, if she provides evidence. Not just on the subject of Charlie converting but on all subjects pertaining to this “investigation.” Finally, this has NOTHING to do with who murdered Charlie and why. I’m tired of talking about it, but she keeps being dishonest about what she actually said, again a mere five days after his murder.

Natalie Jean Beisner

42,540 次观看 • 9 个月前