Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Angus Taylor gets smashed after refusing to say if his party still supports multiculturalism Taylor “I’ve been very clear what we’re committed to” Journo “With respect sir, you’ve now dodged 4 questions in a row”🔥 Well done Angus. #auspol

86,217 views • 24 days ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Here's the Trunk #TreasurersDebate clip #2. This will rock your socks off if you read it carefully. 🧨 EXPOSED: The ABC Debate Setup You Were Never Meant to Notice In the #TreasurersDebate, something very odd happened — and it wasn’t subtle. Here’s the sequence: Angus Taylor attacks Labor’s budget record. Sarah Ferguson cuts him off: “You’ve said that already. Let’s go to what you’re doing.” She then quotes Peter Dutton from a previous show... “…no more tax cuts because the budget can’t afford it…” But then? 🎬 She cuts to a pre-recorded clip of Peter Dutton, from a different interview, saying exactly that. 👈⏪ Read that again! Let’s pause there. This wasn’t live fact-checking. This wasn’t a reaction to what Angus just said. This was a pre-loaded video insert. That means it was already planned and prepared before the debate even started. And here’s the kicker: How could Sarah Ferguson have known exactly when to drop that Dutton clip unless she knew Angus Taylor would say something that made it “relevant”? She wouldn’t have said “let’s hear Peter Dutton say that” unless she was ready to go to the clip. You can’t just whip up a perfectly edited video mid-show and cut to it on the fly. That takes coordination, scripting, and intention. 🧠 So what does this suggest? It suggests that the editorial team at the ABC had a plan to: Quote Peter Dutton and run a clip that framed him as fiscally responsible. Do it before Angus Taylor even outlines the full policy — giving Dutton the benefit of the doubt before the contradiction lands. Then hand the floor to Angus as if the clip settled the argument — creating the illusion that the Coalition is consistent and responsible. Now, let’s be clear: we’re not alleging conspiracy or backroom deals. But in our opinion, this moment wasn't organic. It looks and feels like a staged transition — designed to make Peter Dutton look strong on discipline before revealing the contradiction. If Angus Taylor had gone in another direction, would they still have shown the clip? Seems likely. Because it looks like they were always going to. That’s the issue. This wasn’t just a debate between two Treasurers. It was a scripted sequence with pre-planted messaging, aired during an election campaign. The public deserves transparency — not subtle promotions baked into the format. If that’s what the ABC calls balance, then I’m a fucking Christmas pudding. 🎄🍮 #treasurersdebateABC Clip # 1 "RUDE-POINTY-SNARKY" is here (more to come)

The Noisy Elephant

22,309 views • 1 year ago