Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Announcing Hacker House Fall 2024📢 → 4 days of co-building → 30 devs & designers → $15k scholarships + bounties Let's hack onchain:

18,060 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

9 Comments

Arweave India's profile picture
Arweave India1 year ago

We’re back, building a new cohort of top ao/arweave devs & designers in India The Fall 2024 edition kicks off with the hacker house- an IRL build sprint from Nov 30th to Dec 5th in Bengaluru🏙️

Arweave India's profile picture
Arweave India1 year ago

The last edition brought out multiple ideas that developed into full-time projects and are now on their way to being showcased at the upcoming Demo Day🦄

Arweave India's profile picture
Arweave India1 year ago

Ready for the new cohort? Join the ongoing bootcamp ➡️ Got questions? Hop on to the discord ➡️

devjeff's profile picture
devjeff1 year ago

This is awesome!

GauravBariha's profile picture
GauravBariha1 year ago

@SinghSaksham01

Shivang Parmar's profile picture
Shivang Parmar1 year ago

@KirtirajThakor @mohitparmar1_

Farhat Kadiwala's profile picture
Farhat Kadiwala1 year ago

@vai_shhh27

Saksham Singh's profile picture
Saksham Singh1 year ago

@Bariha_Gaurav

Ankit Singh's profile picture
Ankit Singh1 year ago

lfg

Related Videos

EXCLUSIVE: Star Health is a $1.4B revenue insurance company whose CISO sold ~31 million Indians' data from salary to PAN card to a Chinese hacker for $43k. Ever wondered how these things happen? Here's a breakdown of the events "allegedly" with video proof. 1. Amarjeet Khanuja, CISO of Star Health, reaches out to xenZen through a referral from denol on encrypted chat app Tox on July 6, 2024. 2. xenZen says yes and they negotiate and land on $28k for customer data on Monero (crypto). CISO doesn't know Bitcoin is a bad idea for this nor has ever used escrow. 3. CISO sends hacker login credential and an API endpoint w/details on their proton mail. Hacker sends money and gets it. 4. On July 20, CISO says I can also give you all the claims data. They agree on $15k and repeat the above. 5. Five days later, hacker says his access was revoked and CISO says "You've taken 5TB and I want $150k now because senior management wants a cut." 6. Hacker asks for a refund and gives final warning. 7. xenZen posted a sale listing on BreachForums for diplomatic passports of India (unrelated). 8. Sep 25 is when the starhealthleak website drops with 2 Telegram bots for customer and claims data. From private sources, xenZen says he's bought and sold data from Indian companies before. Attached is video evidence which is unlikely to be spoofed. The media did not care until I posted about it yesterday. Star Health responded by legal threats against Telegram and Cloudflare and a forensic investigation. People in power in India (and perhaps elsewhere) will sell your data in a heartbeat. Why? No one seems to care.

Deedy

668,532 views • 2 years ago

Luca Ferrari is the co-founder and CEO of Bending Spoons, one of the most fascinating companies in Europe and just became Italy's first decacorn. He describes it as 25% private equity firm and 75% technology company. They fully acquire and rebuild digital companies like Evernote, Vimeo, and most recently AOL. Luca Ferrari shares exactly how the Bending Spoons playbook works — how they find great businesses, improve every core function, and finance them with both debt and equity to own and operate forever. We also talk about his obsession with attracting and developing exceptional talent and why he's determined to build a generational company in Europe. Enjoy! Timestamps 0:00 Intro 0:30 What is Bending Spoons? 4:30 Why Europe Lacks Trillion-Dollar Companies 7:25 The First Test: From Failure to Founding 10:52 The McKinsey Years & Funding Co-founders 13:24 The Strategic Insight: Why M&A Over Building 16:13 Structural Advantages of the Platform Model 21:00 Talent as the Ultimate Edge 22:50 Rejecting Consensus 26:28 Early Days: From $10K to Billions 30:52 The Evernote Transformation 36:17 Pricing Power & Monetization Sophistication 40:32 Valuation & Deal Discipline 44:52 Financing Strategy 1:01:47 No Variable Pay: A Contrarian Approach 1:04:14 Areas of Dissatisfaction & Regulatory Frustration 1:09:25 Raising Europe's Largest Private Debt Round 1:13:28 AI's Impact on Software Businesses 1:17:26 Building Culture: State of the Spoon & Retreats 1:20:20 Why There Aren't More Bending Spoons 1:23:35 The Kindest Thing

Patrick OShaughnessy

447,670 views • 11 months ago

NEW: Inside $11B Harvey HQ w/ CEO Winston Weinberg Exclusive tour of their gorgeous SF office & an update on their scale.. TLDR: they're ripping. At 4 years old, Harvey has reached: - Passed $300M ARR this month (3x growth from $100M last August) - Nearly 1K employees, 12 global offices - ~2,000 customers - DAU/MAU up from 36% to 52% this year - 42% of revenue from in-house corporates - Token usage: 1T in January to a projected 13T this month The $11 billion AI platform now used by 2/3 of the AmLaw 100 & 500+ in-house legal teams including HSBC, Bridgewater, Carvana, Blue Owl "I think every single company is going to sell intelligence." - Winston Weinberg Co-Founder Gabe Pereyra + Head of Applied Research Niko coming on next 👀 𝐓𝐈𝐌𝐄𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐌𝐏𝐒 (00:00) Winston Weinberg, Co-Founder & CEO at Harvey (00:45) Inside Harvey HQ (03:17) Harvey by the numbers (04:11) How Harvey expands globally (05:16) Why Harvey employs 200+ lawyers (06:30) The philosophy behind Harvey's office (07:35) The loudest lunch culture in tech (09:03) Winston's favorite room (10:04) Eight Airbnbs before a real office (12:58) Inside a $300M ARR company (14:20) Tripling revenue in under a year (15:35) What $1B+ unlocks (17:36) Building an AI native company (21:10) Convincing lawyers to join tech (22:14) The biggest adjustment for lawyers in tech (23:26) Build vs buy (26:59) What SaaS got away with that AI can't (28:39) Financing 13 trillion tokens (30:05) Why the labs can't just copy Harvey (31:18) Competing with OpenAI & Anthropic (32:03) Will the labs start acquiring? (32:50) Does every task need frontier intelligence? (34:23) Why legal benchmarks are broken (35:30) Ordering the same meal 467 times

Molly O’Shea

389,523 views • 3 months ago

BREAKING: Inside Saronic w/ all 4 Co-Founders An Autonomous Defense Prime $2.6B raised. $9.25B valuation. $3B+ shipyard. 4 years. FULL INTERVIEWS › Dino Mavrookas, CEO › Doug Lambert, COO › Rob Lehman, CCO › Vibhav Altekar, CTO Saronic believes in order to rebuild America's maritime power we must build more ships, faster, cheaper, with autonomy designed in from day one. "What we're building at Saronic will not only provide more capabilities faster, but it'll save the taxpayer hundreds of billions of dollars by driving down costs as well." Stats: › Founded in 2022, valued at $9.25B on $2.6B raised › Building $3B+ Port Alpha shipyard in Brownsville, TX › First gov't agreement secured within 90 days of founding › Spyglass, Cutlass, Corsair & Marauder already in the water › Scaling from 24-foot vessels to 180-foot ships, with 400, 800 & eventually 1,200-foot scale in sight › Partnerships w/ Palantir, NVIDIA, Path Robotics & Starlink / Starshield across manufacturing, compute, autonomy & communications Investors: 8VC, a16z, Elad Gil, Kleiner Perkins, General Catalyst, Caffeinated Capital, Franklin Templeton, Advent International, Bessemer, DFJ Growth, BAM Elevate Across all 4 conversations, we go inside the race to build ships faster than America has in decades, scale autonomous fleets from a handful to hundreds, rebuild the maritime supply chain, rethink defense acquisition reform & bring large-scale shipbuilding back to the U.S. 𝐓𝐈𝐌𝐄𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐌𝐏𝐒 (00:00) Dino, Doug, Rob, & Vib, Co-Founders of Saronic (00:56) America's shrinking naval fleet (06:02) How China wins on price (08:04) The Partnerships powering Saronic (10:55) What Hypergrowth actually requires (12:16) From Spyglass to Marauder: The Evolution (13:13) Inside Saronic's operating structure (14:43) What's actually slowing Re-Industrialization (17:16) Building a workforce from scratch (19:55) What Doug's looking forward to next (22:10) Why Hard Tech is the future (24:36) From the Marine Corps to Saronic (28:18) Winning a Government contract in 90 days (30:06) Why Acquisition reform matters so much (34:44) What's Next for Saronic? (36:15) From Juicero to Anduril to Saronic (39:54) Saronic's development process, Then & Now (42:48) Building Hardware and Software together (46:00) Biggest challenge in Maritime Autonomy (52:15) Saronic's key tech partnerships (53:55) Why Redundant comms are non-negotiable (55:15) When communication fails mid-mission (58:06) Why open source will define AI's future

Molly O’Shea

315,447 views • 27 days ago

DROPS E40: Blockmaze - Crypto is $3 trillion. The world has $600 trillion of assets. Tajinder Virk thinks crypto has been solving the wrong problem for a decade. Every token issued today adds up to $3 trillion. The world holds $600 trillion in assets. He thinks that gap only closes once tokens carry real legal weight, not just technical finality. That's the entire premise behind Blockmaze: a chain where nothing gets tokenized unless it's backed by something tangible, licensed, and enforceable by law. We talk about: - Why real world assets, not speculation, are crypto's actual path to $600 trillion - How Blockmaze tokenized 25,000+ stocks and 12,000 ETFs, a Guinness World Record - Why 70% of the global stock market is now technically tokenizable - What happens when stock settlement drops from two days to six seconds - Why proof of reserve checks happen every 15 days on Blockmaze - How AI agents transacting on tokens could reshape over half of global commerce - Why Tajinder aka "Natty" believes the world is quietly moving back toward a barter economy TIMESTAMPS: 0:00 Introduction 1:17 Welcome to DROPS 1:57 Who is Tajinder aka "Natty"? 2:54 Health & Wealth 3:48 Why Health and Wealth Matter Most? 4:49 Building Food-Based Medicine 7:30 Pharma Sector Feud 9:35 The Story Behind Blockmaze 10:15 Value of Money 12:55 Applying Simplicity to Finance 17:40 Building a Global Financial Infrastructure 18:35 Partnership: FortisX 19:00 Blockchain 'Aha' Moment 23:23 What Is a Real World Asset (RWA)? 24:48 What is Blockmaze? 25:41 What Can You Tokenize? 26:59 Blockmaze's Biggest Success Story 28:39 Endgame of Blockmaze 30:57 Key Message From Co-Founder 33:42 Blockmaze isn't Launching Another Token 34:59 Conclusion

MR SHIFT 🦁

181,080 views • 2 months ago

WATCH: Trump's full answer on the federal judge's ruling about the East Wing ballroom construction... .New York Post’s Steven Nelson: “A judge just ordered you to stop construction of the ballroom. Are you planning to stop?” President Trump: “Well, we’ll appeal, but it’s not — I don’t know — it’s basically — I mean, I wrote [sic] — I wrote [sic] wrote part of his opinion. But basically he’s saying I need congressional approval. And he's so wrong. This is being financed privately. It’s a donation that's being given by companies, very rich companies, very rich people, so that, for 150 years, they’ve wanted a ballroom here. We’re going to have the finest ballroom, I believe, anywhere in the world. And he said we need congressional approval. Well, they don’t give congressional approval from the White House when they do things — they don’t — especially when, you know, we didn't ask for any tax money. We have no taxes — this is taxpayer free. We have no taxpayer putting up $0.10 and I see right here. Just write it out. He said we need congressional approval. Well, we've many things at the White House over the years and they don't get congressional approval when they build it in the White House. It’s just totally separate, especially when it's a donation. I mean, the ballroom is a donation. It's gotten great reviews. People love it. And presidents for 150 years have wanted this ballroom to be built because what we have president Xi or other presidents or prime minister is coming, we don’t have a big room. We have the East Room, which is very small and he said we need congressional approval. He also said, but this is positive for us — I'm allowed — meaning we — are allowed to continue building necessary to — let's see — what is that to — safety and security of the White House and its grounds. So, it says here very carefully the safety and security have to be protected in the White House grounds. Well, that’s what we’re doing because everything's bulletproof glass and center and center, including the ballroom and it goes, construction and all of the things necessary, it says, personal safety of the President and his staff are a part of that. So, it talks about that we’re allowed to continue building. In other words, he put an order on and — even that, he gave 14 days. We don't need it. Because that's what we're doing. He’s allowed to continue building as necessary and when it talks about the safety and security of the White House and its grounds. So, just — so, you know, I wrote some of the things we a drone proof roof and it talks about the president and its staff. Well, we don’t have a lot of bulletproof glass. The White House was built a long time ago. This has the highest level of — in fact, they call this graph — this grass — this — the glass — it's been a bulletproof and its ballistic prove. It's very thick. It’s like that. And it's going 45 feet high and every window is covered, every door is covered. The roof is drone-proof. We have secure air handling systems. You know, bad things happen in the air if you have bad people. We have bio defense all over. We have a secure telecommunications and communications all over. We have bomb shelters that we're building. We have a hospital and very major medical facilities that we’re building. We have all of these things. So, that's called I'm allowed to continue building as necessary. So, think of that — for the safety of the President ---- so we have all these things. So, on that, we’re okay. Where he's totally wrong and he made in a statement, that's fine, but we're really — I’ll give you an example. You have right here, $300 to 400 million depending on finishes. If I use very expensive, marble, if I use very expensive wall coatings, if I — I could bring it up to 400. Otherwise, we're right now ahead of schedule, we’re under budget. But depending on finishes from $300 to 400 million are being given by great people — people that you all know — rich people, companies, big companies, they wanted to see this bill because every president literally for 150 years as needed a space like this. Many of you have got to that tent when we have president of a big country or somebody being honored of great distinction. And they said in a tent. And, if it rains, you get so because the grass gets wet here very fast. It's a very wet area. They used to call it a wetland, But I guess don't do that from the White House, but it's essentially a wetland. And when it rains, you're in trouble. the water can go up to 3 to 4 inches over their shoes. That's not a good feeling for prince — what — who was Prince Charles, who will — who will be here next couple of weeks — is King Charles, who’s a great guy. We don't want him to sit in a pool of water and they've been wanting this for 100 — think of it — 150 years and we’re building it and it’s covered perfectly. What's not covered perfectly is the fact that the judge said we need congressional approval. Many things have built in the White House. They haven’t gotten congressional approval, especially when the money is being not put up by the taxpayer. The taxpayers aren’t putting up a dime. This building was necessary for many years by the fact that I've many ballrooms and I’ve built many things that I know how to build. I’m not building the Federal Reserve where the guy’s spending $4 billion for a tiny little building — $4 billion for the federal reserve building. That contractor’s going to be one of the richest men anywhere in the world after he finishes the Federal Reserve. The man is totally incompetent. Jerome “Too Late” Powell is totally incompetent. And he’s got to get out of office pretty fast. He's doing a bad job, but he’s also done a bad job in shepherding the construction in that building. You know, they ripped down the part of that building and it was a nice — they say it’s one of the nicest buildings in Washington. They ripped it down. So — so, we feel and we don't feel, we know that congressional approval is not necessary to put up a ballroom and with many things they’ve built on the site they never got congressional approval especially with the money is all put up — this is all donations by people that love our country that love the White House and that feel it was very necessary.”

Curtis Houck

50,854 views • 6 months ago