正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Announcing LUMIOS, the world's first human-friendly LED. Powered by revolutionary Ra Incandescent LED technology, Lumios addresses the problems of conventional LED lighting. 1. excess blue light -> low / optimized blue light • Conventional LEDs emit excessive blue light, threatening the eyes, chronically overstimulating the hormonal & nervous systems,...

thelightdiet's profile picture

Matt Maruca 🌞

3,214 subscribers

12,385 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

This is why you should never use LED lights in your home. LED lights are in almost every household but what if I told you they’re slowly making you sick every single day? Traditional light sources like the sun, fire, and even old school incandescent bulbs emit infrared light, which actually boosts cellular energy and repair. But LEDs? They expose you only to blue light. And studies show that prolonged exposure accelerates aging, disrupts neurotransmitters in the brain, and impairs your mitochondria. No wonder so many people feel constantly tired and drained indoors. Niko Instagram Twitter Patreon
0:44

This is why you should never use LED lights in your home. LED lights are in almost every household but what if I told you they’re slowly making you sick every single day? Traditional light sources like the sun, fire, and even old school incandescent bulbs emit infrared light, which actually boosts cellular energy and repair. But LEDs? They expose you only to blue light. And studies show that prolonged exposure accelerates aging, disrupts neurotransmitters in the brain, and impairs your mitochondria. No wonder so many people feel constantly tired and drained indoors. Niko Instagram Twitter Patreon

David Wolfe

229,534 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 WARNING: Your LED bulbs are MAKING YOU SICK from the inside out – Time to THROW THEM AWAY! 🚨 - **Blue Light's Deadly Toll**: Studies show prolonged exposure to blue light from LEDs accelerates aging, disrupts sleep by suppressing melatonin, and is linked to higher risks of cancer, diabetes, heart disease & obesity. One study found a direct connection to increased breast & prostate cancer risks from nighttime blue light. It even damages retinal cells & makes your skin hypersensitive. - **Red Light's Healing Power**: Unlike LEDs, traditional incandescent bulbs emit restorative red & infrared light that boosts cellular energy, reduces inflammation & promotes healing. Red light therapy improves skin complexion in over 90% of users, smooths wrinkles, enhances hair growth & even aids cognition & chronic pain relief. - **The Ban Conspiracy**: Incandescent bulbs – mimicking natural sunlight with healthy infrared – were phased out worldwide under "energy efficiency" pretexts, forcing LEDs that disrupt circadian rhythms & suppress melatonin for poor sleep & health decline. Was this to keep us sick & dependent? Critics call it a hidden agenda ignoring LEDs' blue light harms. Switch to incandescent or red-spectrum alternatives TODAY. Your body will thank you. Have you ditched LEDs yet? Reply below! List of LED bulb alternatives are linked below in replies...
0:44

🚨 WARNING: Your LED bulbs are MAKING YOU SICK from the inside out – Time to THROW THEM AWAY! 🚨 - **Blue Light's Deadly Toll**: Studies show prolonged exposure to blue light from LEDs accelerates aging, disrupts sleep by suppressing melatonin, and is linked to higher risks of cancer, diabetes, heart disease & obesity. One study found a direct connection to increased breast & prostate cancer risks from nighttime blue light. It even damages retinal cells & makes your skin hypersensitive. - **Red Light's Healing Power**: Unlike LEDs, traditional incandescent bulbs emit restorative red & infrared light that boosts cellular energy, reduces inflammation & promotes healing. Red light therapy improves skin complexion in over 90% of users, smooths wrinkles, enhances hair growth & even aids cognition & chronic pain relief. - **The Ban Conspiracy**: Incandescent bulbs – mimicking natural sunlight with healthy infrared – were phased out worldwide under "energy efficiency" pretexts, forcing LEDs that disrupt circadian rhythms & suppress melatonin for poor sleep & health decline. Was this to keep us sick & dependent? Critics call it a hidden agenda ignoring LEDs' blue light harms. Switch to incandescent or red-spectrum alternatives TODAY. Your body will thank you. Have you ditched LEDs yet? Reply below! List of LED bulb alternatives are linked below in replies...

Valerie Anne Smith

72,044 次观看 • 8 个月前

SUPPLEMENTING YOUR WORK ENVIRONMENT WITH AN INCANDESCENT LIGHT BULB IMPROVES MITOCHONDRIAL FUNCTION! - A brand new (Jan 23th, 2026) paper published by Glen Jeffery and Edward Barrett demonstrates how adding a 60 W incandescent lamp to participants work desk dramatically improves color contrast, or a proxy for color vision. The intervention here is simply placing an incandescent lightbulb on the desk without direct irradiation on participants. And this is huge: “we have obtained significant balanced improvements in both the protan and tritan range. Previously, exposure to restricted experimental 670 nm resulted in improvements biased strongly in favour of only tritan function. Hence, exposure to full spectrum lighting results in a balanced pattern of improvement in visual performance.” The mechanism seems to be mitochondrial in nature. Short wavelength light, which is dominated in standard LED lighting, reduces mitochondrial function. There’s a reduction in mitochondria ATP production, and therefore a reduced demand for glucose. This intern can increase body weight and serum cytokinin levels. Also, with short wavelength blue light, there is an increase probability of cell aging and death. “It is suggested that this is partly due to 420–450 nm light, dominant in LEDs, being absorbed by porphyrin and the subsequent production of oxygen singlets driving inflammation.” “Conversely, exposure to longer wavelengths is associated with increased mitochondrial membrane potential and increased concentration of mitochondrial complex proteins that have declined with ageing and disease. This in turn is associated with elevated ATP, reduced inflammation and extended average lifespan.“ So, for the love of mitochondria, get long-wavelength light! This can be done in many ways: -sunlight/daylight exposure (does not need to be direct sunlight) -fire light -incandescent light bulbs -LEDs that emit long-wavelength light (yes, LEDs CAN emit red and near-infrared, but most don’t)
2:56

SUPPLEMENTING YOUR WORK ENVIRONMENT WITH AN INCANDESCENT LIGHT BULB IMPROVES MITOCHONDRIAL FUNCTION! - A brand new (Jan 23th, 2026) paper published by Glen Jeffery and Edward Barrett demonstrates how adding a 60 W incandescent lamp to participants work desk dramatically improves color contrast, or a proxy for color vision. The intervention here is simply placing an incandescent lightbulb on the desk without direct irradiation on participants. And this is huge: “we have obtained significant balanced improvements in both the protan and tritan range. Previously, exposure to restricted experimental 670 nm resulted in improvements biased strongly in favour of only tritan function. Hence, exposure to full spectrum lighting results in a balanced pattern of improvement in visual performance.” The mechanism seems to be mitochondrial in nature. Short wavelength light, which is dominated in standard LED lighting, reduces mitochondrial function. There’s a reduction in mitochondria ATP production, and therefore a reduced demand for glucose. This intern can increase body weight and serum cytokinin levels. Also, with short wavelength blue light, there is an increase probability of cell aging and death. “It is suggested that this is partly due to 420–450 nm light, dominant in LEDs, being absorbed by porphyrin and the subsequent production of oxygen singlets driving inflammation.” “Conversely, exposure to longer wavelengths is associated with increased mitochondrial membrane potential and increased concentration of mitochondrial complex proteins that have declined with ageing and disease. This in turn is associated with elevated ATP, reduced inflammation and extended average lifespan.“ So, for the love of mitochondria, get long-wavelength light! This can be done in many ways: -sunlight/daylight exposure (does not need to be direct sunlight) -fire light -incandescent light bulbs -LEDs that emit long-wavelength light (yes, LEDs CAN emit red and near-infrared, but most don’t)

Jonathan Jarecki

65,208 次观看 • 6 个月前

Andrew Huberman just explained why the switch from old incandescent bulbs to modern LEDs might be quietly messing with our biology. Short-wavelength light (blue/green) dominates LEDs and screens. Long-wavelength light (red/infrared) — the kind that reaches deeper into the body — is largely missing. He cited work from Glenn Jeffery’s lab at University College London showing that long-wavelength light improves mitochondrial function, boosts ATP production, blunts blood glucose spikes, and can even improve vision. Incandescent bulbs and sunlight naturally provide this balance; LEDs do not. Long-wavelength light is absorbed by water in mitochondria, enhancing electron transport chain efficiency and reducing oxidative stress. Studies show improved glucose regulation and mitochondrial performance when red/infrared exposure is added, especially in the absence of excessive short-wavelength light at night. Huberman isn’t anti-LED, but he’s clear: our modern environment is short-wavelength heavy and long-wavelength deficient, and that mismatch may be contributing to metabolic and sleep issues, particularly in younger generations glued to screens. Have you noticed a difference in energy, sleep, or focus when you get more natural sunlight versus heavy indoor LED/screen exposure? Or do you still think the light itself is a minor factor compared to content? Your thoughts 👇
3:57

Andrew Huberman just explained why the switch from old incandescent bulbs to modern LEDs might be quietly messing with our biology. Short-wavelength light (blue/green) dominates LEDs and screens. Long-wavelength light (red/infrared) — the kind that reaches deeper into the body — is largely missing. He cited work from Glenn Jeffery’s lab at University College London showing that long-wavelength light improves mitochondrial function, boosts ATP production, blunts blood glucose spikes, and can even improve vision. Incandescent bulbs and sunlight naturally provide this balance; LEDs do not. Long-wavelength light is absorbed by water in mitochondria, enhancing electron transport chain efficiency and reducing oxidative stress. Studies show improved glucose regulation and mitochondrial performance when red/infrared exposure is added, especially in the absence of excessive short-wavelength light at night. Huberman isn’t anti-LED, but he’s clear: our modern environment is short-wavelength heavy and long-wavelength deficient, and that mismatch may be contributing to metabolic and sleep issues, particularly in younger generations glued to screens. Have you noticed a difference in energy, sleep, or focus when you get more natural sunlight versus heavy indoor LED/screen exposure? Or do you still think the light itself is a minor factor compared to content? Your thoughts 👇

Camus

13,896 次观看 • 5 个月前

I've been recommending incandescent light bulbs. But what about your kitchen? Your bathroom? Incandescents don't fit most of those fixtures. The answer: halogen bulbs. Glen Jeffery, UCL: "In the kitchen I have got a halogen lamp. When you get up in the morning and you're spending that 45 minutes doing stuff — there's a halogen lamp there on at the right time." Halogen is a type of incandescent. Almost identical full spectrum output. Infrared included. The key difference: Halogen bulbs contain halogen gas that redeposits tungsten back onto the filament as it evaporates — longer lifespan, same full spectrum output. The result: longer lifespan than a standard incandescent, higher operating temperature, and slightly whiter light — but still full spectrum with significant infrared output. Like incandescents, halogen bulbs have been phased out and banned across much of Europe and the UK. But they can still be found — Amazon, specialist lighting suppliers, some hardware stores still carry stock. And if you can dim them: "If you just turn the power down — which increases the amount of infrared light — the bulb will last almost forever." Jeffery's team ran a study in a windowless UCL building under harsh LED lighting. They replaced desk lamps with 40W incandescent bulbs — not aimed at eyes, just supplementing the environment. Two weeks later: color perception improved significantly — more than anything they'd seen with long-wavelength LEDs. They removed the bulbs. Came back six days later. The improvement was maintained. A month later — still maintained. Jeffery: "We are suffering from a suppression of our physiology via mitochondria that is just being produced by the built environment." The fix doesn't have to be complicated. Incandescent bulbs where you can. Halogen in the kitchen and bathroom where you can't. Indoor lighting environment sorted.
1:43

I've been recommending incandescent light bulbs. But what about your kitchen? Your bathroom? Incandescents don't fit most of those fixtures. The answer: halogen bulbs. Glen Jeffery, UCL: "In the kitchen I have got a halogen lamp. When you get up in the morning and you're spending that 45 minutes doing stuff — there's a halogen lamp there on at the right time." Halogen is a type of incandescent. Almost identical full spectrum output. Infrared included. The key difference: Halogen bulbs contain halogen gas that redeposits tungsten back onto the filament as it evaporates — longer lifespan, same full spectrum output. The result: longer lifespan than a standard incandescent, higher operating temperature, and slightly whiter light — but still full spectrum with significant infrared output. Like incandescents, halogen bulbs have been phased out and banned across much of Europe and the UK. But they can still be found — Amazon, specialist lighting suppliers, some hardware stores still carry stock. And if you can dim them: "If you just turn the power down — which increases the amount of infrared light — the bulb will last almost forever." Jeffery's team ran a study in a windowless UCL building under harsh LED lighting. They replaced desk lamps with 40W incandescent bulbs — not aimed at eyes, just supplementing the environment. Two weeks later: color perception improved significantly — more than anything they'd seen with long-wavelength LEDs. They removed the bulbs. Came back six days later. The improvement was maintained. A month later — still maintained. Jeffery: "We are suffering from a suppression of our physiology via mitochondria that is just being produced by the built environment." The fix doesn't have to be complicated. Incandescent bulbs where you can. Halogen in the kitchen and bathroom where you can't. Indoor lighting environment sorted.

no.mind

16,042 次观看 • 3 个月前

𝗜 𝗪𝗔𝗦 𝗦𝗞𝗘𝗣𝗧𝗜𝗖𝗔𝗟 𝗔𝗕𝗢𝗨𝗧 𝗧𝗛𝗜𝗦 𝗧𝗢𝗢 — 𝗦𝗢 𝗜 𝗗𝗜𝗗 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗘𝗔𝗥𝗖𝗛. 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗦𝗖𝗜𝗘𝗡𝗖𝗘 𝗜𝗦 𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗟. Andrew Huberman recently told Bill Maher something that sounds wild — that the long-wavelength red and infrared light present in sunlight and old incandescent bulbs actually passes through your body, charges your mitochondria, improves your vision, and helps regulate blood sugar. And that the short-wavelength-dominant LED lights now in most of our homes may be quietly undermining mitochondrial function. His words: 𝘛𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘶𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘤𝘳𝘢𝘻𝘺. 𝘛𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘮𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘭 𝘤𝘳𝘢𝘻𝘺. I was skeptical too. So I looked it up. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗯𝗮𝗰𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗽𝗲𝗲𝗿-𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘄𝗲𝗱. Professor Glen Jeffery at University College London — one of the researchers Huberman specifically names — published a study in 𝘚𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘤 𝘙𝘦𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘴 in July 2025 confirming that infrared wavelengths from sunlight measurably pass through the human torso, even through clothing, and that just 15 minutes of exposure improved color vision by 16% (blue axis) and 9% (red axis) in participants — measured 24 hours later, even when light was blocked from their eyes during exposure. A separate study from the same lab showed that red light exposure reduced post-meal blood glucose spikes by 27%. These aren't fringe blogs. This is University College London published in Nature's Scientific Reports. The mechanism Huberman describes checks out. Your mitochondria contain water that absorbs long-wavelength red and infrared light — the same reason reds disappear when you go underwater. That absorption drives better ATP production, the energy currency of your cells. The retina has more mitochondria per cell than almost any other tissue in the body, which is why vision improvements show up as such a clean measurable signal. 𝗡𝗼𝘄 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗽𝗶𝗲𝗰𝗲. The Biden administration's energy efficiency regulations effectively phased out most incandescent bulbs. The stated reason was energy savings. What was never part of the regulatory conversation — at all — was the growing scientific literature suggesting that the near-infrared wavelengths stripped out of LED lighting may have real biological consequences. Whether that was ignorance or indifference, the result is the same: Americans were nudged by government policy into lighting that the emerging science suggests is metabolically inferior. 𝗦𝗼 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗱𝗼 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗱𝗼 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗶𝘁? Huberman himself is practical about this — he has LEDs at home and isn't panicking. Here's what the science actually points to: The primary solution is sunlight. Outdoors sunlight delivers near-infrared at levels no bulb can match. Even 15 minutes outside — clothed — appears sufficient to trigger measurable effects. If you work near a window, that helps too. For indoor lighting, not all LEDs are equal. Look for "full spectrum" or "broad spectrum" LED bulbs that include wavelengths in the 600–900 nm range. "Warm white" LEDs (2700–3000K color temperature) are closer to incandescent output and include more red-spectrum light than the cool blue-dominant bulbs. They're not a perfect substitute for sunlight, but they're meaningfully better than standard cool-white LEDs for this purpose. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲𝗮𝘄𝗮𝘆 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱: get outside every day. Eat near a window. If you're replacing bulbs, choose warm-spectrum LEDs. And maybe ask why a government that claims to care about public health never thought to ask what stripping infrared out of every American home might do to the people living in them.
2:15

𝗜 𝗪𝗔𝗦 𝗦𝗞𝗘𝗣𝗧𝗜𝗖𝗔𝗟 𝗔𝗕𝗢𝗨𝗧 𝗧𝗛𝗜𝗦 𝗧𝗢𝗢 — 𝗦𝗢 𝗜 𝗗𝗜𝗗 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗘𝗔𝗥𝗖𝗛. 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗦𝗖𝗜𝗘𝗡𝗖𝗘 𝗜𝗦 𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗟. Andrew Huberman recently told Bill Maher something that sounds wild — that the long-wavelength red and infrared light present in sunlight and old incandescent bulbs actually passes through your body, charges your mitochondria, improves your vision, and helps regulate blood sugar. And that the short-wavelength-dominant LED lights now in most of our homes may be quietly undermining mitochondrial function. His words: 𝘛𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘶𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘤𝘳𝘢𝘻𝘺. 𝘛𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘮𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘭 𝘤𝘳𝘢𝘻𝘺. I was skeptical too. So I looked it up. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗯𝗮𝗰𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗽𝗲𝗲𝗿-𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘄𝗲𝗱. Professor Glen Jeffery at University College London — one of the researchers Huberman specifically names — published a study in 𝘚𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘤 𝘙𝘦𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘴 in July 2025 confirming that infrared wavelengths from sunlight measurably pass through the human torso, even through clothing, and that just 15 minutes of exposure improved color vision by 16% (blue axis) and 9% (red axis) in participants — measured 24 hours later, even when light was blocked from their eyes during exposure. A separate study from the same lab showed that red light exposure reduced post-meal blood glucose spikes by 27%. These aren't fringe blogs. This is University College London published in Nature's Scientific Reports. The mechanism Huberman describes checks out. Your mitochondria contain water that absorbs long-wavelength red and infrared light — the same reason reds disappear when you go underwater. That absorption drives better ATP production, the energy currency of your cells. The retina has more mitochondria per cell than almost any other tissue in the body, which is why vision improvements show up as such a clean measurable signal. 𝗡𝗼𝘄 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗽𝗶𝗲𝗰𝗲. The Biden administration's energy efficiency regulations effectively phased out most incandescent bulbs. The stated reason was energy savings. What was never part of the regulatory conversation — at all — was the growing scientific literature suggesting that the near-infrared wavelengths stripped out of LED lighting may have real biological consequences. Whether that was ignorance or indifference, the result is the same: Americans were nudged by government policy into lighting that the emerging science suggests is metabolically inferior. 𝗦𝗼 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗱𝗼 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗱𝗼 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗶𝘁? Huberman himself is practical about this — he has LEDs at home and isn't panicking. Here's what the science actually points to: The primary solution is sunlight. Outdoors sunlight delivers near-infrared at levels no bulb can match. Even 15 minutes outside — clothed — appears sufficient to trigger measurable effects. If you work near a window, that helps too. For indoor lighting, not all LEDs are equal. Look for "full spectrum" or "broad spectrum" LED bulbs that include wavelengths in the 600–900 nm range. "Warm white" LEDs (2700–3000K color temperature) are closer to incandescent output and include more red-spectrum light than the cool blue-dominant bulbs. They're not a perfect substitute for sunlight, but they're meaningfully better than standard cool-white LEDs for this purpose. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲𝗮𝘄𝗮𝘆 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱: get outside every day. Eat near a window. If you're replacing bulbs, choose warm-spectrum LEDs. And maybe ask why a government that claims to care about public health never thought to ask what stripping infrared out of every American home might do to the people living in them.

M.A. Rothman

21,780 次观看 • 5 个月前

Dr. Andrew Huberman just confirmed a “wild conspiracy theory” about incandescent lights and LED bulbs. The long wavelengths found in incandescents increase your metabolism and “charge your mitochondria.” Conversely, the LED bulbs that most of you have in your house are “causing disruptions in mitochondrial function.” DR. ANDREW HUBERMAN: “Your mitochondria function better, you increase ATP production, your metabolism increases in the presence of red light, long wavelength light to the skin.” “Shine long wavelength light on somebody, watch blood glucose levels in a blood glucose test, and it’s blunted.” “Now, the LED lights that are commonly used now… that short wavelength light, in the absence of long wavelength light, has been shown to damage the mitochondria.” “This used to be considered crazy. This was like chemtrail crazy, right?” “But now we’re starting to see from animal studies and human studies, from Glenn Jeffreys and others, that people’s vision gets better when they get in front of an incandescent bulb once a day.” “If they get sunlight, which also has long-wavelength light, your vision improves because of improvements in mitochondria.” The Biden administration quietly pushed incandescents out of the market through aggressive energy regulations. But you can still find them online today if you look hard enough. If that health insight stood out to you, there’s a lot more where that came from.
2:15

Dr. Andrew Huberman just confirmed a “wild conspiracy theory” about incandescent lights and LED bulbs. The long wavelengths found in incandescents increase your metabolism and “charge your mitochondria.” Conversely, the LED bulbs that most of you have in your house are “causing disruptions in mitochondrial function.” DR. ANDREW HUBERMAN: “Your mitochondria function better, you increase ATP production, your metabolism increases in the presence of red light, long wavelength light to the skin.” “Shine long wavelength light on somebody, watch blood glucose levels in a blood glucose test, and it’s blunted.” “Now, the LED lights that are commonly used now… that short wavelength light, in the absence of long wavelength light, has been shown to damage the mitochondria.” “This used to be considered crazy. This was like chemtrail crazy, right?” “But now we’re starting to see from animal studies and human studies, from Glenn Jeffreys and others, that people’s vision gets better when they get in front of an incandescent bulb once a day.” “If they get sunlight, which also has long-wavelength light, your vision improves because of improvements in mitochondria.” The Biden administration quietly pushed incandescents out of the market through aggressive energy regulations. But you can still find them online today if you look hard enough. If that health insight stood out to you, there’s a lot more where that came from.

A Midwestern Doctor

415,823 次观看 • 2 个月前

⚡ RECIPE TO PROTECT YOURSELF IF YOU WORK IN AN OFFICE 1️⃣ 🌞Morning Sunlight = Non-negotiable If your job starts after sunrise, spend 10–15 minutes outside looking at the sky. Doesn’t matter if it’s raining, snowing, or cloudy; infrared light still passes through and starts your circadian clock through the eyes. No sunglasses, no screens. Let natural UV + IR set your biological rhythm. 😬 but If you start before sunrise, buy a near-infrared lamp and turn it on while getting ready. It’s the next-best option. 2️⃣ 🔵Blue-Blocking Glasses = A Must Wear amber lenses under office LEDs. After 4 p.m., switch to red lenses if still under artificial light. 3️⃣🥋Natural Clothing for Protection Choose natural fabrics like wool, cotton, or linen. They don’t hold static charge like synthetics and let your body breathe. Indoors, pick dark colors (black, navy, charcoal) to block excessive artificial light. Remember: Hair, hand, and neck. EMF-blocking fabrics are even better if you can afford them. 4️⃣🆘Add Infrared Support Keep a near-infrared therapy light on your desk or near your computer. If you can’t afford it, use small red bulbs, halogen, or incandescent lamps instead to replace missing infrared from LEDs. 5️⃣💻Screen Filters & Settings On your computer, activate Night Shift, f.lux, or Iris; set color temperature around 1800–2000 K (red/orange tone) if can go bellow better.. if you can bring your own, buy one of those pc with Build-in-blue-light-filters.(if you can afford) If you can not buy a blue-light filter film for your monitor. Reduce brightness slightly; increase contrast for comfort. 6️⃣🪑Reposition Your Desk Sit near a window and open it if possible. Avoid sitting directly under fluorescent or LED ceiling lights. If coworkers ask why you opened the window, say it’s to “circulate the stagnant air.” 😉 Remember: even if the window is far from you, cracking it open still helps. The Lid Experiment shows that infrared light passes through even the smallest gaps, meaning that open window benefits everyone in the office; including you. ☀️ 7️⃣🚬Light Breaks…Your “Fake Smoke” Trick Every 90 minutes, go outside for 3–5 minutes of natural light. Hold a real cigarette, and fake it... you’re feeding your mitochondria, not nicotine. 8️⃣🌳Ground at Lunch Step outside and find the biggest tree near your office. Touch it with bare hands or feet for one minute; trees discharge harmful stray currents from the ground. Even one minute of grounding stabilizes your body’s electrical charge. 9️⃣💦Hydrate Intelligently Drink mineral or spring water, not distilled. Add a pinch of sea salt and a few drops of local lemon juice to improve structure and conductivity. (Check my page for the big crystal water pitcher setup to structure your water naturally.) 🔟💡Reduce Reflections & Glare Use matte screen protectors and avoid glossy surfaces; glare amplifies blue frequencies. 🚫Keep Tech Off the Body Never rest a laptop on your lap. Keep phones and routers off or away when not in use. 🌅Sunset Reset After work, go outside for sunset light exposure. It tells your brain that the day is ending and resets your circadian rhythm. ⚫️🏴‍☠️Dark Office Cleanup If you are alone and must stay late, use red light only. If note, cover you body head to toe… Avoid bright screens and overhead LEDs after dark…., 🍱 🧬 Feed the Mitochondrial Antenna Seafood = DHA rebuilds light-conducting membranes. Magnesium & sulfur-rich foods (eggs, onions, garlic) = support redox cycling….
7:39

⚡ RECIPE TO PROTECT YOURSELF IF YOU WORK IN AN OFFICE 1️⃣ 🌞Morning Sunlight = Non-negotiable If your job starts after sunrise, spend 10–15 minutes outside looking at the sky. Doesn’t matter if it’s raining, snowing, or cloudy; infrared light still passes through and starts your circadian clock through the eyes. No sunglasses, no screens. Let natural UV + IR set your biological rhythm. 😬 but If you start before sunrise, buy a near-infrared lamp and turn it on while getting ready. It’s the next-best option. 2️⃣ 🔵Blue-Blocking Glasses = A Must Wear amber lenses under office LEDs. After 4 p.m., switch to red lenses if still under artificial light. 3️⃣🥋Natural Clothing for Protection Choose natural fabrics like wool, cotton, or linen. They don’t hold static charge like synthetics and let your body breathe. Indoors, pick dark colors (black, navy, charcoal) to block excessive artificial light. Remember: Hair, hand, and neck. EMF-blocking fabrics are even better if you can afford them. 4️⃣🆘Add Infrared Support Keep a near-infrared therapy light on your desk or near your computer. If you can’t afford it, use small red bulbs, halogen, or incandescent lamps instead to replace missing infrared from LEDs. 5️⃣💻Screen Filters & Settings On your computer, activate Night Shift, f.lux, or Iris; set color temperature around 1800–2000 K (red/orange tone) if can go bellow better.. if you can bring your own, buy one of those pc with Build-in-blue-light-filters.(if you can afford) If you can not buy a blue-light filter film for your monitor. Reduce brightness slightly; increase contrast for comfort. 6️⃣🪑Reposition Your Desk Sit near a window and open it if possible. Avoid sitting directly under fluorescent or LED ceiling lights. If coworkers ask why you opened the window, say it’s to “circulate the stagnant air.” 😉 Remember: even if the window is far from you, cracking it open still helps. The Lid Experiment shows that infrared light passes through even the smallest gaps, meaning that open window benefits everyone in the office; including you. ☀️ 7️⃣🚬Light Breaks…Your “Fake Smoke” Trick Every 90 minutes, go outside for 3–5 minutes of natural light. Hold a real cigarette, and fake it... you’re feeding your mitochondria, not nicotine. 8️⃣🌳Ground at Lunch Step outside and find the biggest tree near your office. Touch it with bare hands or feet for one minute; trees discharge harmful stray currents from the ground. Even one minute of grounding stabilizes your body’s electrical charge. 9️⃣💦Hydrate Intelligently Drink mineral or spring water, not distilled. Add a pinch of sea salt and a few drops of local lemon juice to improve structure and conductivity. (Check my page for the big crystal water pitcher setup to structure your water naturally.) 🔟💡Reduce Reflections & Glare Use matte screen protectors and avoid glossy surfaces; glare amplifies blue frequencies. 🚫Keep Tech Off the Body Never rest a laptop on your lap. Keep phones and routers off or away when not in use. 🌅Sunset Reset After work, go outside for sunset light exposure. It tells your brain that the day is ending and resets your circadian rhythm. ⚫️🏴‍☠️Dark Office Cleanup If you are alone and must stay late, use red light only. If note, cover you body head to toe… Avoid bright screens and overhead LEDs after dark…., 🍱 🧬 Feed the Mitochondrial Antenna Seafood = DHA rebuilds light-conducting membranes. Magnesium & sulfur-rich foods (eggs, onions, garlic) = support redox cycling….

Light Me Away ☀️

14,918 次观看 • 10 个月前

After a brief warning of what’s coming next, the conversation shifted to what you can do about your health right now. Dr. Ealy revealed the remarkable benefits of incandescent bulbs, describing them as a “great thing,” showing a giant wave of red light (the healthy type). “Go back to incandescents. It’s the easiest fix,” he said. “You will immediately feel calm and slow in your home. I’ve been doing this with some students… and people have been like ‘Oh my God. It’s instantaneous that my entire nervous system calms down.” The Biden administration effectively banned incandescent bulbs in 2023 by enforcing strict energy efficiency rules. Go figure. But you can still find them in limited quantities online or possibly at your local hardware store. Maria then dropped an insight most people haven’t considered: the ban on incandescent light bulbs might not be about energy efficiency at all. It’s about control—specifically, genetic control. The field is called optogenetics, and it uses light to manipulate gene expression. “They’ve figured out how to alter your genes through LED lights,” she warned. Dr. Ealy backed her up with a chilling explanation. Blue light from everyday devices (phones, TVs, and computers) isn’t just disrupting sleep. It’s triggering something already inside us. “They put the Trojan horse in you,” he said, referring to DNA fragments and plasmids from the COVID shots. Then, when you’re staring at your screen at night, “you’re getting hit with spikes of blue light.” That’s when the activation happens. The fix, according to Ealy, is surprisingly simple: “Bathe yourself in incandescent light.”
1:57

After a brief warning of what’s coming next, the conversation shifted to what you can do about your health right now. Dr. Ealy revealed the remarkable benefits of incandescent bulbs, describing them as a “great thing,” showing a giant wave of red light (the healthy type). “Go back to incandescents. It’s the easiest fix,” he said. “You will immediately feel calm and slow in your home. I’ve been doing this with some students… and people have been like ‘Oh my God. It’s instantaneous that my entire nervous system calms down.” The Biden administration effectively banned incandescent bulbs in 2023 by enforcing strict energy efficiency rules. Go figure. But you can still find them in limited quantities online or possibly at your local hardware store. Maria then dropped an insight most people haven’t considered: the ban on incandescent light bulbs might not be about energy efficiency at all. It’s about control—specifically, genetic control. The field is called optogenetics, and it uses light to manipulate gene expression. “They’ve figured out how to alter your genes through LED lights,” she warned. Dr. Ealy backed her up with a chilling explanation. Blue light from everyday devices (phones, TVs, and computers) isn’t just disrupting sleep. It’s triggering something already inside us. “They put the Trojan horse in you,” he said, referring to DNA fragments and plasmids from the COVID shots. Then, when you’re staring at your screen at night, “you’re getting hit with spikes of blue light.” That’s when the activation happens. The fix, according to Ealy, is surprisingly simple: “Bathe yourself in incandescent light.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

17,917 次观看 • 1 年前

Dr. Andrew Huberman just confirmed a “wild conspiracy theory” about incandescent lights and LED bulbs. The long wavelengths found in incandescents increase your metabolism and “charge your mitochondria.” Conversely, the LED bulbs that most of you have in your house are “causing disruptions in mitochondrial function.” DR. ANDREW HUBERMAN: “Your mitochondria function better, you increase ATP production, your metabolism increases in the presence of red light, long wavelength light to the skin.” “Shine long wavelength light on somebody, watch blood glucose levels in a blood glucose test, and it’s blunted.” “Now, the LED lights that are commonly used now… that short wavelength light, in the absence of long wavelength light, has been shown to damage the mitochondria.” “This used to be considered crazy. This was like chemtrail crazy, right?” “But now we’re starting to see from animal studies and human studies, from Glenn Jeffreys and others, that people’s vision gets better when they get in front of an incandescent bulb once a day.” “If they get sunlight, which also has long-wavelength light, your vision improves because of improvements in mitochondria.” The Biden administration quietly pushed incandescents out of the market through aggressive energy regulations. But you can still find them online today if you look hard enough. If that health insight stood out to you, there’s a lot more where that came from. (See post below) This page finds the moments they don’t want going viral, with captions that tell you exactly why they matter before you even hit play. See why 2 million already follow: The Vigilant Fox 🦊
2:15

Dr. Andrew Huberman just confirmed a “wild conspiracy theory” about incandescent lights and LED bulbs. The long wavelengths found in incandescents increase your metabolism and “charge your mitochondria.” Conversely, the LED bulbs that most of you have in your house are “causing disruptions in mitochondrial function.” DR. ANDREW HUBERMAN: “Your mitochondria function better, you increase ATP production, your metabolism increases in the presence of red light, long wavelength light to the skin.” “Shine long wavelength light on somebody, watch blood glucose levels in a blood glucose test, and it’s blunted.” “Now, the LED lights that are commonly used now… that short wavelength light, in the absence of long wavelength light, has been shown to damage the mitochondria.” “This used to be considered crazy. This was like chemtrail crazy, right?” “But now we’re starting to see from animal studies and human studies, from Glenn Jeffreys and others, that people’s vision gets better when they get in front of an incandescent bulb once a day.” “If they get sunlight, which also has long-wavelength light, your vision improves because of improvements in mitochondria.” The Biden administration quietly pushed incandescents out of the market through aggressive energy regulations. But you can still find them online today if you look hard enough. If that health insight stood out to you, there’s a lot more where that came from. (See post below) This page finds the moments they don’t want going viral, with captions that tell you exactly why they matter before you even hit play. See why 2 million already follow: The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

4,129,289 次观看 • 5 个月前

Dr. Jack Kruse just revealed how blue light causes skin cancer. He says the proof is in how we treat people with severe burns. Kruse is a neurosurgeon who says when burn surgeons or doctors treat burn victims, they use blue light directly on the wound. "You put blue light on a burn victim, you know what it does? It stimulates the skin to grow faster." That same mechanism is exactly what makes blue light dangerous under normal conditions. Cancer is uncontrolled cell growth. Blue light triggers rapid cell division. On a burn wound that's helpful. On healthy skin every day for years, it's a problem. • Your laptop emits blue light • Your phone screen emits blue light • The LED bulbs in your ceiling emit blue light Kruse says incandescent bulbs naturally offset this because they contain UV and red light alongside the blue. Those bulbs are being banned completely by 2028. The frequency that causes cancer is in every room you enter. The frequency that counteracted it is being legislated out of existence. — Dr. Jack Kruse (☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist in exile 🟩🔆) on the Danny Jones (Danny Jones) podcast PS: If interested in content like this, follow me as I continue sharing unconventional health insights you won't find anywhere else on X.
0:27

Dr. Jack Kruse just revealed how blue light causes skin cancer. He says the proof is in how we treat people with severe burns. Kruse is a neurosurgeon who says when burn surgeons or doctors treat burn victims, they use blue light directly on the wound. "You put blue light on a burn victim, you know what it does? It stimulates the skin to grow faster." That same mechanism is exactly what makes blue light dangerous under normal conditions. Cancer is uncontrolled cell growth. Blue light triggers rapid cell division. On a burn wound that's helpful. On healthy skin every day for years, it's a problem. • Your laptop emits blue light • Your phone screen emits blue light • The LED bulbs in your ceiling emit blue light Kruse says incandescent bulbs naturally offset this because they contain UV and red light alongside the blue. Those bulbs are being banned completely by 2028. The frequency that causes cancer is in every room you enter. The frequency that counteracted it is being legislated out of existence. — Dr. Jack Kruse (☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist in exile 🟩🔆) on the Danny Jones (Danny Jones) podcast PS: If interested in content like this, follow me as I continue sharing unconventional health insights you won't find anywhere else on X.

Goku

70,187 次观看 • 4 个月前

👀Remember my post about freckles? If freckles mean melanin is coming out from the brain toward the skin to catch more sunlight (UV), then vitiligo is the opposite… it means melanin is leaving the skin going back in. 🤔 But why? 💡 When the Light Code Turns Toxic 😬 When skin is deprived of natural full-spectrum sunlight during the day and bombarded with toxic blue light at the wrong times (after sunset), the relationship between melanin, mitochondria, and repair systems collapses. The skin no longer “feels safe,” and melanin begins to migrate inside, away from the surface that’s now under photonic war attack. ⚙️ How It Works? Melanin acts like Nature’s solar panel. ☀️ If sunlight is good 👍🏻 full-spectrum, morning-rich, UV balanced with infrared and melanin says: “It’s safe. I’ll go to the surface and make energy.” But when the light is bad 👎🏻fake, blue, flickering, unbalanced, or constant at night, melanin says: “Retreat! The signal is toxic. Protect the core.” 🧬 Let’s Go a Little Deeper Melanin = Antenna, not Paint. ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist in exile 🟩🔆 reminds us that melanin is a semiconductor, not a color pigment. It absorbs photons, converts them into electron flow, and manages redox, especially through the quartet of sunlight, DHA, grounding, and darkness. YES, darkness. It links the surface (skin, eyes, retina) to the core (brain and mitochondria) through light signals that we get through our environment. Freckles appear when the environment asks for more light capture. They’re an adaptive response to strong, natural light and other factors; our skin sending out more antennas to gather photons(go to take a look at my freckles post). 👹Vitiligo Appears When the Environment Turns Hostile When the body is flooded with blue/LED light, EMFs, and deprived of UV and IR(infrared), the photon code becomes chaotic. The body reads this as toxic light; signals that don’t match the natural solar spectrum. With poor redox and weak mitochondria, vitiligo appears. The brain sends a new command: “Pull melanin back inside. Protect the neurons, glands, and mitochondrial core. Mayday in progress.” Vitiligo isn’t pigment loss; it’s pigment relocation. Melanin retreats from a toxic light environment back into the body’s sanctuary to protect vital organs like the brain and heart; the organs that use the most light (energy). When the host avoid the sun and can no longer generate or store enough light, biology makes a trade: to preserve the core, the surface must be sacrificed. 🏔️ Example: Imagine being trapped on Mount Everest. To keep the core warm, the body sacrifices fingers, toes, ears, and nose; the areas with the least circulation, the ones less vital for survival. Vitiligo works the same way. When the light environment turns very hostile, the skin becomes the sacrifice. The pigment(melanin, the molecule that keeps energy flowing) go back inward to defend the core’s energetic integrity. It’s not failure; it’s a strategic withdrawal to protect life’s inner flame 🔥 The skin loses color; not as a malfunction, but as a defensive retreat mechanism 👀 a biological survival move. 🧭 And what creates it? A broken light–circadian–mitochondrial communication loop. When sunlight, magnetism, and redox fall apart, the skin–brain photonic link collapses. Freckles, melanoma, and vitiligo become they are expressions of the same imbalance; different responses to a distorted light environment. 🔋 How to Fix It? Repair the Redox 👇🏻 Rebuild light coherence. See sunrise daily( this one is NOT NEGOTIABLE, why? Go to my post on “Why Sunrise is no-negotiable for your CTA” and you know why) Avoid artificial light after dark. Ground. Eat DHA-rich seafood. Honor darkness. It’s Nature’s operating system update. Protect yourself from EMFs…. When the surface feels safe again and when real sunlight, magnetism, and rhythm return; melanin will come back home. 🏠
3:15

👀Remember my post about freckles? If freckles mean melanin is coming out from the brain toward the skin to catch more sunlight (UV), then vitiligo is the opposite… it means melanin is leaving the skin going back in. 🤔 But why? 💡 When the Light Code Turns Toxic 😬 When skin is deprived of natural full-spectrum sunlight during the day and bombarded with toxic blue light at the wrong times (after sunset), the relationship between melanin, mitochondria, and repair systems collapses. The skin no longer “feels safe,” and melanin begins to migrate inside, away from the surface that’s now under photonic war attack. ⚙️ How It Works? Melanin acts like Nature’s solar panel. ☀️ If sunlight is good 👍🏻 full-spectrum, morning-rich, UV balanced with infrared and melanin says: “It’s safe. I’ll go to the surface and make energy.” But when the light is bad 👎🏻fake, blue, flickering, unbalanced, or constant at night, melanin says: “Retreat! The signal is toxic. Protect the core.” 🧬 Let’s Go a Little Deeper Melanin = Antenna, not Paint. ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist in exile 🟩🔆 reminds us that melanin is a semiconductor, not a color pigment. It absorbs photons, converts them into electron flow, and manages redox, especially through the quartet of sunlight, DHA, grounding, and darkness. YES, darkness. It links the surface (skin, eyes, retina) to the core (brain and mitochondria) through light signals that we get through our environment. Freckles appear when the environment asks for more light capture. They’re an adaptive response to strong, natural light and other factors; our skin sending out more antennas to gather photons(go to take a look at my freckles post). 👹Vitiligo Appears When the Environment Turns Hostile When the body is flooded with blue/LED light, EMFs, and deprived of UV and IR(infrared), the photon code becomes chaotic. The body reads this as toxic light; signals that don’t match the natural solar spectrum. With poor redox and weak mitochondria, vitiligo appears. The brain sends a new command: “Pull melanin back inside. Protect the neurons, glands, and mitochondrial core. Mayday in progress.” Vitiligo isn’t pigment loss; it’s pigment relocation. Melanin retreats from a toxic light environment back into the body’s sanctuary to protect vital organs like the brain and heart; the organs that use the most light (energy). When the host avoid the sun and can no longer generate or store enough light, biology makes a trade: to preserve the core, the surface must be sacrificed. 🏔️ Example: Imagine being trapped on Mount Everest. To keep the core warm, the body sacrifices fingers, toes, ears, and nose; the areas with the least circulation, the ones less vital for survival. Vitiligo works the same way. When the light environment turns very hostile, the skin becomes the sacrifice. The pigment(melanin, the molecule that keeps energy flowing) go back inward to defend the core’s energetic integrity. It’s not failure; it’s a strategic withdrawal to protect life’s inner flame 🔥 The skin loses color; not as a malfunction, but as a defensive retreat mechanism 👀 a biological survival move. 🧭 And what creates it? A broken light–circadian–mitochondrial communication loop. When sunlight, magnetism, and redox fall apart, the skin–brain photonic link collapses. Freckles, melanoma, and vitiligo become they are expressions of the same imbalance; different responses to a distorted light environment. 🔋 How to Fix It? Repair the Redox 👇🏻 Rebuild light coherence. See sunrise daily( this one is NOT NEGOTIABLE, why? Go to my post on “Why Sunrise is no-negotiable for your CTA” and you know why) Avoid artificial light after dark. Ground. Eat DHA-rich seafood. Honor darkness. It’s Nature’s operating system update. Protect yourself from EMFs…. When the surface feels safe again and when real sunlight, magnetism, and rhythm return; melanin will come back home. 🏠

🌞Light Me Away 💫

31,229 次观看 • 10 个月前

Dr. Jack Kruse just revealed how blue light hijacks the dopamine reward pathways in your brain. Your phone, laptop, and TV are all running on a light that keeps your dopamine low by design. He says this was engineered on purpose. Kruse is a neurosurgeon who traced where this blue light display technology came from: 1) In the 1950s, DARPA funded IBM to develop liquid crystal displays using blue light. Side note: DARPA is the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. They build military technology. The internet started there. 2) In 1995, DARPA gave the search algorithm to two Stanford students who founded Google along with this technology 3) Today, Meta and Google own the patents on how this light is delivered through every screen you use. Kruse asked one question no one in tech has answered. Why does every screen on Earth default to blue light? You need third-party software just to get red light on your own device. Kruse says the reason is simple. Blue light at specific frequencies makes screens addictive. It lowers dopamine over time. It makes users more compliant and easier to influence. DARPA wants it sticky so people can be programmed through the content they consume. He says 55% of the American population has already been affected by screen technology in exactly this way. The blue glow on your face right now isn't accidental. According to Kruse, it never was. — Jack Kruse (☣️ Jack Kruse = BTC foundationalist in exile 🟩 ☀️) on the Danny Jones (Danny Jones) Podcast
1:39

Dr. Jack Kruse just revealed how blue light hijacks the dopamine reward pathways in your brain. Your phone, laptop, and TV are all running on a light that keeps your dopamine low by design. He says this was engineered on purpose. Kruse is a neurosurgeon who traced where this blue light display technology came from: 1) In the 1950s, DARPA funded IBM to develop liquid crystal displays using blue light. Side note: DARPA is the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. They build military technology. The internet started there. 2) In 1995, DARPA gave the search algorithm to two Stanford students who founded Google along with this technology 3) Today, Meta and Google own the patents on how this light is delivered through every screen you use. Kruse asked one question no one in tech has answered. Why does every screen on Earth default to blue light? You need third-party software just to get red light on your own device. Kruse says the reason is simple. Blue light at specific frequencies makes screens addictive. It lowers dopamine over time. It makes users more compliant and easier to influence. DARPA wants it sticky so people can be programmed through the content they consume. He says 55% of the American population has already been affected by screen technology in exactly this way. The blue glow on your face right now isn't accidental. According to Kruse, it never was. — Jack Kruse (☣️ Jack Kruse = BTC foundationalist in exile 🟩 ☀️) on the Danny Jones (Danny Jones) Podcast

Goku

4,675,926 次观看 • 5 个月前

☀️ Why the Gates of Hell Want to Dim the Sun I asked myself: 🤔 Why would billionaires spend billions to block sunlight; the very source of all life? Because the Sun is the antidote to their entire control system. When you own your light, you own your biology. When they dim your light, they own you 🫵🏻 🙇🏻‍♀️How that works? 🧠 1 - Control the Frequency of Life The human body runs on light frequencies, not just calories. Our mitochondria are tiny light antennas. They decode sunlight into energy, hormones, and emotions. When sunlight hits the skin and eyes, it builds: Dopamine + Melatonin + Nitric oxide +EZ water,…,all the ingredients for repair and regeneration = health Block that signal and they block human sovereignty. ☁️ 2 - Replace Natural Light with Artificial Blue Its blocks infrared (IR) and ultraviolet (UVA) = the healing ends of the spectrum. While the tech industry fills our world with blue light and microwave EMF…, and those things: Blue light raises cortisol and stress✅ Suppresses melatonin (so no deep repair)✅ Shrinks dopamine levels (so no joy, no drive)✅ Breaks circadian timing(our body’s master clock)✅ Dries up EZ water and destroys mitochondrial coherence (killing us from inside out)✅ And much more…. Without UVA and IR from the Sun, blue light becomes a 🧨 They’re 🌥️ the sum to make sure nothing interferes with their plans. 💉 3- Decouple Humans from Nature Now add the chemical and biological layers: “💉” laced with adjuvants, metals, lipid nanoparticles Food and water filled with endocrine disruptors… Air loaded with particulates that scatter sunlight All these create frequency mismatches; signals your mitochondria can’t read. An alien 👽 in our planet. Result: broken electron flow, inflammation, low ATP (energy), and turbo diseases. Once your redox is low enough, your biology becomes programmable. A body without coherent light can be manipulated by artificial frequency. 🌫 4 - Collapse Human Charge When they block infrared and UV, they cut your ability to charge cellular water. Less charge = less life. You become tired, addicted, anxious, obedient,…,perfect for a control systems. A low-redox population doesn’t rebel. It complies. 🌥️That’s why they dim the sun. That’s why the same people push blue-lit smart cities, 5G grids, and indoor lifestyles. Because they’re making sure to keep their fiat Ponzi scheme afloat, by reducing the number of people in the world, so the few who remains will own nothing and be happy 👀 When this triad 👉🏻 light, water, magnetism 👈🏻 is restored, detox happens automatically, and our body can buffer, recycle, and adapt and our mitochondria handle what no supplement can 💊 🧬 The War on Light Is a War on Consciousness This is not just environmental manipulation; it’s spiritual warfare… Dimming the sun is about dimming your internal light. When Bill Gates and World Health Organization (WHO) push “solar dimming,” they’re not saving the planet; they’re controlling it. ☀️ Less UVA & Infrared = less structured water (EZ), less nitric oxide, less dopamine = weaker bodies, weaker minds. 💀 More blue light + EMF = more stress, more turbo disease = more despair 💊 More dependency = more profit for them, less freedom for us. They’re killing us, slowly, while making sure we spend every penny on their products. A win-win for them, a lose-lose for us. And as Dr. Jack Kruse Decentralized Medicine Maxi 🔆 said: “They can’t own your body if you hold the Sun.” 🔋 The Real Solution ⚡️ UNITED and REDOX but If your country is too fare gone 😖 then leave, go where there’s the sunshine. Where you can still benefit from a better climate and more freedom. That’s where your redox will thrive…and don’t forget to add Bitcoin to the mix, in a cold wallet. Because if you’re holding fiat, you’re going to be left behind. Full interview 👇🏻
8:48

☀️ Why the Gates of Hell Want to Dim the Sun I asked myself: 🤔 Why would billionaires spend billions to block sunlight; the very source of all life? Because the Sun is the antidote to their entire control system. When you own your light, you own your biology. When they dim your light, they own you 🫵🏻 🙇🏻‍♀️How that works? 🧠 1 - Control the Frequency of Life The human body runs on light frequencies, not just calories. Our mitochondria are tiny light antennas. They decode sunlight into energy, hormones, and emotions. When sunlight hits the skin and eyes, it builds: Dopamine + Melatonin + Nitric oxide +EZ water,…,all the ingredients for repair and regeneration = health Block that signal and they block human sovereignty. ☁️ 2 - Replace Natural Light with Artificial Blue Its blocks infrared (IR) and ultraviolet (UVA) = the healing ends of the spectrum. While the tech industry fills our world with blue light and microwave EMF…, and those things: Blue light raises cortisol and stress✅ Suppresses melatonin (so no deep repair)✅ Shrinks dopamine levels (so no joy, no drive)✅ Breaks circadian timing(our body’s master clock)✅ Dries up EZ water and destroys mitochondrial coherence (killing us from inside out)✅ And much more…. Without UVA and IR from the Sun, blue light becomes a 🧨 They’re 🌥️ the sum to make sure nothing interferes with their plans. 💉 3- Decouple Humans from Nature Now add the chemical and biological layers: “💉” laced with adjuvants, metals, lipid nanoparticles Food and water filled with endocrine disruptors… Air loaded with particulates that scatter sunlight All these create frequency mismatches; signals your mitochondria can’t read. An alien 👽 in our planet. Result: broken electron flow, inflammation, low ATP (energy), and turbo diseases. Once your redox is low enough, your biology becomes programmable. A body without coherent light can be manipulated by artificial frequency. 🌫 4 - Collapse Human Charge When they block infrared and UV, they cut your ability to charge cellular water. Less charge = less life. You become tired, addicted, anxious, obedient,…,perfect for a control systems. A low-redox population doesn’t rebel. It complies. 🌥️That’s why they dim the sun. That’s why the same people push blue-lit smart cities, 5G grids, and indoor lifestyles. Because they’re making sure to keep their fiat Ponzi scheme afloat, by reducing the number of people in the world, so the few who remains will own nothing and be happy 👀 When this triad 👉🏻 light, water, magnetism 👈🏻 is restored, detox happens automatically, and our body can buffer, recycle, and adapt and our mitochondria handle what no supplement can 💊 🧬 The War on Light Is a War on Consciousness This is not just environmental manipulation; it’s spiritual warfare… Dimming the sun is about dimming your internal light. When Bill Gates and World Health Organization (WHO) push “solar dimming,” they’re not saving the planet; they’re controlling it. ☀️ Less UVA & Infrared = less structured water (EZ), less nitric oxide, less dopamine = weaker bodies, weaker minds. 💀 More blue light + EMF = more stress, more turbo disease = more despair 💊 More dependency = more profit for them, less freedom for us. They’re killing us, slowly, while making sure we spend every penny on their products. A win-win for them, a lose-lose for us. And as Dr. Jack Kruse Decentralized Medicine Maxi 🔆 said: “They can’t own your body if you hold the Sun.” 🔋 The Real Solution ⚡️ UNITED and REDOX but If your country is too fare gone 😖 then leave, go where there’s the sunshine. Where you can still benefit from a better climate and more freedom. That’s where your redox will thrive…and don’t forget to add Bitcoin to the mix, in a cold wallet. Because if you’re holding fiat, you’re going to be left behind. Full interview 👇🏻

Light Me Away ☀️

192,675 次观看 • 10 个月前

Joe Rogan just casually mentioned ditching his reading glasses entirely — and credits red light therapy as the biggest reason. He used to need them to read his phone. Now? Nothing. He says a red light bed made a “giant difference,” even more than the macular support vitamins he takes. Here’s the wild part: science actually backs this up. A University College London study found that just three minutes of deep red (670nm) light in the morning improved color contrast vision by an average of 17% in people over 40 — with some seeing up to 20% better — and the gains lasted a full week. Other research shows photobiomodulation helps mitochondrial function in retinal cells, which naturally decline with age and screen use. Our eyes are getting wrecked by blue light and aging. If something this simple and low-risk can push back against that, it’s a pretty big deal for staying sharp as we get older. I’ve been pretty skeptical of most biohacking gadgets, but this one feels surprisingly solid and easy to try. Might be adding a red light panel to the routine soon. Has anyone here tried red light therapy for vision? Did it actually work for you?
0:44

Joe Rogan just casually mentioned ditching his reading glasses entirely — and credits red light therapy as the biggest reason. He used to need them to read his phone. Now? Nothing. He says a red light bed made a “giant difference,” even more than the macular support vitamins he takes. Here’s the wild part: science actually backs this up. A University College London study found that just three minutes of deep red (670nm) light in the morning improved color contrast vision by an average of 17% in people over 40 — with some seeing up to 20% better — and the gains lasted a full week. Other research shows photobiomodulation helps mitochondrial function in retinal cells, which naturally decline with age and screen use. Our eyes are getting wrecked by blue light and aging. If something this simple and low-risk can push back against that, it’s a pretty big deal for staying sharp as we get older. I’ve been pretty skeptical of most biohacking gadgets, but this one feels surprisingly solid and easy to try. Might be adding a red light panel to the routine soon. Has anyone here tried red light therapy for vision? Did it actually work for you?

Camus

118,707 次观看 • 3 个月前

Here’s how to ACTUALLY block blue light on your iPhone, most of the apps are actually just filtering a narrow spectrum. This method puts it into pure red light mode. This hack has helped my sleep immeasurably. Step 1: Settings > Accessibility > Display and Text Size > Color Filters Step 2: Turn on color filter > Check “Color Tint” Step 3: Slide the “Intensity” and “Hue” bars all the way to the right (this is maximum red and filters all blue light) Step 4: Go back two screens to “accessibility” then click “Accessibility Shortcut” Step 5: Check “Color Filters” - this turns on the “triple click” function that allows for easy On/Off for this setting How to use: Follow the sun - do not turn off the red light filter until you have consumed true natural red light from the sun in the AM for at least 10-15 mins. I usually wait well into the morning and after my morning outdoor walk before I triple click back to “normal view” Once dusk hits, so too should your red light filter return. So in the winter, that’s like 6p where I live… Ideally, you are not consuming screens at least 2 hours before bed for max circadian support. But if you must, make sure you are at least using this one quick easy technique. Our modern tech lives lead to an absolute decimation of our circadian rhythms, which subsequently leads to all sorts of detrimental impacts like low T, insulin resistance, fat gain, and thyroid dysfunction, amongst many others. Follow Zaid K. Dahhaj and Abud Bakri MD for much deeper analysis on these topics.
0:42

Here’s how to ACTUALLY block blue light on your iPhone, most of the apps are actually just filtering a narrow spectrum. This method puts it into pure red light mode. This hack has helped my sleep immeasurably. Step 1: Settings > Accessibility > Display and Text Size > Color Filters Step 2: Turn on color filter > Check “Color Tint” Step 3: Slide the “Intensity” and “Hue” bars all the way to the right (this is maximum red and filters all blue light) Step 4: Go back two screens to “accessibility” then click “Accessibility Shortcut” Step 5: Check “Color Filters” - this turns on the “triple click” function that allows for easy On/Off for this setting How to use: Follow the sun - do not turn off the red light filter until you have consumed true natural red light from the sun in the AM for at least 10-15 mins. I usually wait well into the morning and after my morning outdoor walk before I triple click back to “normal view” Once dusk hits, so too should your red light filter return. So in the winter, that’s like 6p where I live… Ideally, you are not consuming screens at least 2 hours before bed for max circadian support. But if you must, make sure you are at least using this one quick easy technique. Our modern tech lives lead to an absolute decimation of our circadian rhythms, which subsequently leads to all sorts of detrimental impacts like low T, insulin resistance, fat gain, and thyroid dysfunction, amongst many others. Follow Zaid K. Dahhaj and Abud Bakri MD for much deeper analysis on these topics.

Sandeep Palakodeti, MD MPH

207,083 次观看 • 2 年前

Thought experiment for people regarding the concept of Absolute Time. Absolute means NO EXCEPTIONS. We are NOT looking back in time when we see galaxies and stars. We are NOT looking back in time 1.25 seconds when we see the moon. We're Not looking back in time 3 minutes when we see Mars. We're Not looking back in time 8.33 minutes when we see the Sun. If an astronaut lit a matchstick on Mars, the distant observer would see predator heat waves at the top of the matchstick in real-time while the matchstick started to blacken towards the astronaut's fingers. But there would be no orange light from that chemical reaction or flame seen. If the matchstick burnt out before the packet of orange light from that particular chemical reaction made it to Earth… then the distant observer would just see a disembodied orange flash of light with a lag. But the Earth-bound observer would never actually see the flame associated with the orange wavelength it put out. The wavelength of color emitted by the flame is not a recording of reality. If the orange light is 650 Thz, that means there are 650 trillion individual and separate bursts of orange light pulsating in 1 second. NOT that "the same light" is "waving" 650 trillion times a second and that light is a recording of reality. There are 650 trillion brand-new lights flashing in 1 second. Each Hertz is a brand-new emission and packet unto itself. Time does not re-emit 650 trillion times a second, nor is a photon a particle or a packet of reality acting like the frame of a reel of footage. The orange light that already left the flame will continue to propagate out until it meets the electrons making up the distant observer. But remember, it is never the same light within that packet. And the electrons making up the observer will absorb all of those different lights within that packet and re-emit brand-new lights that produce the product of illumination. A photon is a massless packet of energy, spherically expanding at the rate of c from the source it comes from. Illumination is the result of that energy being absorbed and RE-emitted by any other electrons that did not output that primary packet. But time is not associated with the same light. It's never the same light and time does not re-emit between packets. Time is not relative. Do NOT allow your mind Carte Blanche to think along the lines of relative time. DROP IT for this thought experiment. We are thinking along the lines of ABSOLUTE TIME/ Galilean VARIANCE. What does absolute time mean? It means time is constant in ALL frames of reference. Any frequency shifts between atomic clocks IS a literal change in the speed of light. But relativity forbids the speed of light from Ever changing, so relativity (Lorentz INVARIANCE) invented the concept of the 4th dimension and space-time. Because Relativity doesn't allow light speed to shift.. they interpret the same frequency shift between atomic clocks as being conclusive, irrefutable evidence that time and reality itself shifts. Rather than say it's just that ONE clock being affected by Earth's gravity and the oscillation of that ONE cesium clock is being altered compared to other clocks. People don't realize that in relativity... time dilation is SYMMETRICAL! Not even most relativists know their own theory. If Clock A and Clock B are synchronized and together... and then they accelerate apart... Einstein said Clock A would see Clock B as being slower itself. And Clock B would view Clock A as slower than ITself. NOT that only one observer would see back in time and the other would see forward or not at all. No... BOTH observers are supposed to see each other BACK in time relative to each other according to Einstein and the consequence of the math. It doesn't make ANY sense!! But relativists toss that part of time dilation under their 4th dimensional rug. The rug is woven from threads of gold that only the smart people can see apparently. So... here's a thought experiment/ Gedankenexperiment for absolute time. NO paradoxes... no nonsense or confusion. What do you see in a club? You see disco lights changing and a color wheel effect. You see everyone in REAL-TIME. Not just because they are so close to the lights. Light is not a recording of reality. Light is simply color. Illuminating reality in a certain color. Just because you can't see something yet or the color hasn't reached you doesn't mean it isn't happening in real-time. Zoom out and look at the people in the club through binoculars a mile away. You are still looking at them in real-time. The colors are shifting with a delay in the club. Now look at the club through a telescope from the surface of the moon. You're still looking at the people in real-time. But now there is a lag of the colors shifting by 1.25 seconds because it takes light 1.25 seconds to travel from the Earth to the moon. Now look at the club through an even bigger telescope from the surface of Mars. You're still looking at the people in real-time, but now there is a lag of the colors shifting by 3 minutes because it takes light 3 minutes to travel from Earth to Mars. fr you are a third hypothetical observer zoomed out and watching the person from Mars AND seeing the club on Earth... you're still seeing everything happening in real-time as well. But you see the colored wavepackets traveling with a delay to the observer on Mars. And the disco color wheel effect is just lagging before it affects the observer from Mars and the observer on the Moon. It doesn't matter how far you zoom out! There is only now to observe. But there WILL be a lag and delay for a given color/wavepacket to reach distant observers. But all points in space are already illuminated by other starlight. So if you're too far away... you'll just see the club in real-time but without any disco lights. Just see them in white light because that's the source already illuminating the scene. This is where it gets the most difficult because people think light itself is a recording of reality that replays a scene from where it came from. But another punch in the gut of relativity is that in order to see REFLECTED light... that would require a TWO-WAY transit. Which means the light would have to be sent out... record the scene of a distant event and then RETURN in order to REplay the event. Which means it would take 6 minutes to see the club from Mars by that logic and 2.5 seconds to see the club from the moon by that logic. The difference in tick rates between clocks has NOTHING to do with time dilation. Wait.. what?! How can that be? Because a clock itself doesn't represent all of time and reality. The difference between clocks is a "Transverse relative time shift." If the only light in the universe was from the lighter… the only way a distant observer would be able to see the astronaut on Mars is if the astronaut held down the button of the lighter for longer than 3 minutes. It takes 3 minutes for the packet of light to travel from Mars to Earth. The distant observer would never be able to see Mars, unless the light stretched from Mars all the way to Earth, and illuminated the path between Mars and Earth. And that would take 3 minutes for the boundary and first part of that wave packet to reach Earth. But if the distant observer wanted to observe Mars in real-time… then that packet of light would have to be on for longer than 3 minutes. So if the astronaut on Mars flicked the lighter at 12:00, the distant observer on Earth wouldn't see anything until 12:03. If the light was on for 3 minutes and 10 seconds, and the distant observer is 3 light minutes away... the distant observer would be able to see Mars in real-time for 10 seconds starting at 12:03. In the 20 second video clip of the rotating planet with shifting colors... just imagine you're a couple light minutes or light seconds away. You're still seeing the planet spin in real-time. But there is simply a delay of switching colors. You are Not looking back in time. It's just a color wheel effect from a great distance away. That's it!! There are many major flaws which tarnish people's critical thinking on this thought experiment. 1. Light does NOT ricochet or bounce. Electrons absorb, emit and re-emit ALL electromagnetic radiation. The electrons, making up the glass of a mirror will absorb the incoming light and re-emit a brand-new light as an equal and opposite reaction. NOT that "the same light" bounced off the mirror and continued on within the same frame of reference.  2. Light is NOT a recording of reality. 3. It is NOT the same light being observed from a source. It's never the same light. Each Hertz is a new light. Think of half of a sine wave as being its own emission. On an oscilloscope, a stimulus generates a peak which initiates an equal and opposite trough. Or vice versa. That repeating process is not "the same light." If you cut and paste that sine wave to another sine wave, the boundary between the waves will always be in phase. (thus refraction) 4. The speed of light is NOT the same in ALL frames of reference, no matter what. 5. Light is NOT made of particles and waves that flip back-and-forth. 6. Time is NOT connected to the speed of light. Time remains constant regardless if you accelerate towards or away from a clock. The clocks themselves will indeed be off! But that's an affect on the electrons making up the atomic clock affecting the oscillation of the isotope which is ASSUMED to ALWAYS be the same. So ANY difference in oscillation is treated as a literal distortion in space-time. 7. Space and time are not linked at all. That is a mathematical artifice under Lorentz invariance. Time is relative under Lorentz invariance. But time is absolute under Galilean VARIANCE. When people hear or see the word GALILEAN... their brains switch to auto pilot to "aether theory" and "classical physics." What people don't realize is that aether theory used Galilean INVARIANCE. Rather than space-time being used as an excuse to explain the difference in frequencies between atomic clocks... it was originally aether being used as an excuse to keep the speed of light the same. But None of those things are valid! We are thinking under the framework of Galilean VARIANCE! Completely new revolutionary model returning to Isaac Newton and Classical physics but without the corpuscular theory (particle) theory for light... without a particle-wave duality... without an aether... without a 4th dimension. Just good ol elementary math within 3D Euclidean space. Everything happening in real-time, right now. This reformulation of Galilean transformations was offered by Dr. Edward Dowdye in 1991 called The Extinction Shift Principle. Effectivity as opposed to Relativity. If light required a two-way transit, in order to travel out… Record an event, and travel back to replay the recording…  then it would take 6 minutes to see the astronaut on Mars instead of 3.  Remember… They say the SAME light is a recording, and must travel there and travel back in order to REplay. Relativity says time is relative: t' ≠ t time is NOT the same from all frames of reference) and t = tₒ / √1 - v²/c² but Galilean Variance says time is not relative: t' = t (Time IS the same from all frames of reference) and τ_tr = τₒ / √1 - v²/c² Relativity says c' = c (The velocity of light is the same from all frames of reference) but Galilean variance says c' ≠ c (The velocity of light is NOT the same from all frames of reference) and that c' = c ± v (The velocity of light in one frame of reference is dependent upon the velocity of the light source relative to an observer in another frame of reference. Whether that light source is approaching or receding away from that observer) Relativity says E = mc² (Energy and mass are universally equivalent and literally interchangeable under All conditions.) but Galilean variance says E = Δmc² = mₒc² (Energy changes in a system are the result from changes in mass. mₒ represents the original mass. Mass and energy do not literally interchange. There is an equivalence, not an interchange.) The Rebirth of Classical Physics: Time, Light & Gravity Star light and illumination: Flicking a Lighter on Mars visual example:
0:21

Thought experiment for people regarding the concept of Absolute Time. Absolute means NO EXCEPTIONS. We are NOT looking back in time when we see galaxies and stars. We are NOT looking back in time 1.25 seconds when we see the moon. We're Not looking back in time 3 minutes when we see Mars. We're Not looking back in time 8.33 minutes when we see the Sun. If an astronaut lit a matchstick on Mars, the distant observer would see predator heat waves at the top of the matchstick in real-time while the matchstick started to blacken towards the astronaut's fingers. But there would be no orange light from that chemical reaction or flame seen. If the matchstick burnt out before the packet of orange light from that particular chemical reaction made it to Earth… then the distant observer would just see a disembodied orange flash of light with a lag. But the Earth-bound observer would never actually see the flame associated with the orange wavelength it put out. The wavelength of color emitted by the flame is not a recording of reality. If the orange light is 650 Thz, that means there are 650 trillion individual and separate bursts of orange light pulsating in 1 second. NOT that "the same light" is "waving" 650 trillion times a second and that light is a recording of reality. There are 650 trillion brand-new lights flashing in 1 second. Each Hertz is a brand-new emission and packet unto itself. Time does not re-emit 650 trillion times a second, nor is a photon a particle or a packet of reality acting like the frame of a reel of footage. The orange light that already left the flame will continue to propagate out until it meets the electrons making up the distant observer. But remember, it is never the same light within that packet. And the electrons making up the observer will absorb all of those different lights within that packet and re-emit brand-new lights that produce the product of illumination. A photon is a massless packet of energy, spherically expanding at the rate of c from the source it comes from. Illumination is the result of that energy being absorbed and RE-emitted by any other electrons that did not output that primary packet. But time is not associated with the same light. It's never the same light and time does not re-emit between packets. Time is not relative. Do NOT allow your mind Carte Blanche to think along the lines of relative time. DROP IT for this thought experiment. We are thinking along the lines of ABSOLUTE TIME/ Galilean VARIANCE. What does absolute time mean? It means time is constant in ALL frames of reference. Any frequency shifts between atomic clocks IS a literal change in the speed of light. But relativity forbids the speed of light from Ever changing, so relativity (Lorentz INVARIANCE) invented the concept of the 4th dimension and space-time. Because Relativity doesn't allow light speed to shift.. they interpret the same frequency shift between atomic clocks as being conclusive, irrefutable evidence that time and reality itself shifts. Rather than say it's just that ONE clock being affected by Earth's gravity and the oscillation of that ONE cesium clock is being altered compared to other clocks. People don't realize that in relativity... time dilation is SYMMETRICAL! Not even most relativists know their own theory. If Clock A and Clock B are synchronized and together... and then they accelerate apart... Einstein said Clock A would see Clock B as being slower itself. And Clock B would view Clock A as slower than ITself. NOT that only one observer would see back in time and the other would see forward or not at all. No... BOTH observers are supposed to see each other BACK in time relative to each other according to Einstein and the consequence of the math. It doesn't make ANY sense!! But relativists toss that part of time dilation under their 4th dimensional rug. The rug is woven from threads of gold that only the smart people can see apparently. So... here's a thought experiment/ Gedankenexperiment for absolute time. NO paradoxes... no nonsense or confusion. What do you see in a club? You see disco lights changing and a color wheel effect. You see everyone in REAL-TIME. Not just because they are so close to the lights. Light is not a recording of reality. Light is simply color. Illuminating reality in a certain color. Just because you can't see something yet or the color hasn't reached you doesn't mean it isn't happening in real-time. Zoom out and look at the people in the club through binoculars a mile away. You are still looking at them in real-time. The colors are shifting with a delay in the club. Now look at the club through a telescope from the surface of the moon. You're still looking at the people in real-time. But now there is a lag of the colors shifting by 1.25 seconds because it takes light 1.25 seconds to travel from the Earth to the moon. Now look at the club through an even bigger telescope from the surface of Mars. You're still looking at the people in real-time, but now there is a lag of the colors shifting by 3 minutes because it takes light 3 minutes to travel from Earth to Mars. fr you are a third hypothetical observer zoomed out and watching the person from Mars AND seeing the club on Earth... you're still seeing everything happening in real-time as well. But you see the colored wavepackets traveling with a delay to the observer on Mars. And the disco color wheel effect is just lagging before it affects the observer from Mars and the observer on the Moon. It doesn't matter how far you zoom out! There is only now to observe. But there WILL be a lag and delay for a given color/wavepacket to reach distant observers. But all points in space are already illuminated by other starlight. So if you're too far away... you'll just see the club in real-time but without any disco lights. Just see them in white light because that's the source already illuminating the scene. This is where it gets the most difficult because people think light itself is a recording of reality that replays a scene from where it came from. But another punch in the gut of relativity is that in order to see REFLECTED light... that would require a TWO-WAY transit. Which means the light would have to be sent out... record the scene of a distant event and then RETURN in order to REplay the event. Which means it would take 6 minutes to see the club from Mars by that logic and 2.5 seconds to see the club from the moon by that logic. The difference in tick rates between clocks has NOTHING to do with time dilation. Wait.. what?! How can that be? Because a clock itself doesn't represent all of time and reality. The difference between clocks is a "Transverse relative time shift." If the only light in the universe was from the lighter… the only way a distant observer would be able to see the astronaut on Mars is if the astronaut held down the button of the lighter for longer than 3 minutes. It takes 3 minutes for the packet of light to travel from Mars to Earth. The distant observer would never be able to see Mars, unless the light stretched from Mars all the way to Earth, and illuminated the path between Mars and Earth. And that would take 3 minutes for the boundary and first part of that wave packet to reach Earth. But if the distant observer wanted to observe Mars in real-time… then that packet of light would have to be on for longer than 3 minutes. So if the astronaut on Mars flicked the lighter at 12:00, the distant observer on Earth wouldn't see anything until 12:03. If the light was on for 3 minutes and 10 seconds, and the distant observer is 3 light minutes away... the distant observer would be able to see Mars in real-time for 10 seconds starting at 12:03. In the 20 second video clip of the rotating planet with shifting colors... just imagine you're a couple light minutes or light seconds away. You're still seeing the planet spin in real-time. But there is simply a delay of switching colors. You are Not looking back in time. It's just a color wheel effect from a great distance away. That's it!! There are many major flaws which tarnish people's critical thinking on this thought experiment. 1. Light does NOT ricochet or bounce. Electrons absorb, emit and re-emit ALL electromagnetic radiation. The electrons, making up the glass of a mirror will absorb the incoming light and re-emit a brand-new light as an equal and opposite reaction. NOT that "the same light" bounced off the mirror and continued on within the same frame of reference.  2. Light is NOT a recording of reality. 3. It is NOT the same light being observed from a source. It's never the same light. Each Hertz is a new light. Think of half of a sine wave as being its own emission. On an oscilloscope, a stimulus generates a peak which initiates an equal and opposite trough. Or vice versa. That repeating process is not "the same light." If you cut and paste that sine wave to another sine wave, the boundary between the waves will always be in phase. (thus refraction) 4. The speed of light is NOT the same in ALL frames of reference, no matter what. 5. Light is NOT made of particles and waves that flip back-and-forth. 6. Time is NOT connected to the speed of light. Time remains constant regardless if you accelerate towards or away from a clock. The clocks themselves will indeed be off! But that's an affect on the electrons making up the atomic clock affecting the oscillation of the isotope which is ASSUMED to ALWAYS be the same. So ANY difference in oscillation is treated as a literal distortion in space-time. 7. Space and time are not linked at all. That is a mathematical artifice under Lorentz invariance. Time is relative under Lorentz invariance. But time is absolute under Galilean VARIANCE. When people hear or see the word GALILEAN... their brains switch to auto pilot to "aether theory" and "classical physics." What people don't realize is that aether theory used Galilean INVARIANCE. Rather than space-time being used as an excuse to explain the difference in frequencies between atomic clocks... it was originally aether being used as an excuse to keep the speed of light the same. But None of those things are valid! We are thinking under the framework of Galilean VARIANCE! Completely new revolutionary model returning to Isaac Newton and Classical physics but without the corpuscular theory (particle) theory for light... without a particle-wave duality... without an aether... without a 4th dimension. Just good ol elementary math within 3D Euclidean space. Everything happening in real-time, right now. This reformulation of Galilean transformations was offered by Dr. Edward Dowdye in 1991 called The Extinction Shift Principle. Effectivity as opposed to Relativity. If light required a two-way transit, in order to travel out… Record an event, and travel back to replay the recording…  then it would take 6 minutes to see the astronaut on Mars instead of 3.  Remember… They say the SAME light is a recording, and must travel there and travel back in order to REplay. Relativity says time is relative: t' ≠ t time is NOT the same from all frames of reference) and t = tₒ / √1 - v²/c² but Galilean Variance says time is not relative: t' = t (Time IS the same from all frames of reference) and τ_tr = τₒ / √1 - v²/c² Relativity says c' = c (The velocity of light is the same from all frames of reference) but Galilean variance says c' ≠ c (The velocity of light is NOT the same from all frames of reference) and that c' = c ± v (The velocity of light in one frame of reference is dependent upon the velocity of the light source relative to an observer in another frame of reference. Whether that light source is approaching or receding away from that observer) Relativity says E = mc² (Energy and mass are universally equivalent and literally interchangeable under All conditions.) but Galilean variance says E = Δmc² = mₒc² (Energy changes in a system are the result from changes in mass. mₒ represents the original mass. Mass and energy do not literally interchange. There is an equivalence, not an interchange.) The Rebirth of Classical Physics: Time, Light & Gravity Star light and illumination: Flicking a Lighter on Mars visual example:

TheRealVerbz (Jason Verbelli)

16,608 次观看 • 2 年前

In the 1970s they ran an experiment that still blows minds today. They took four windowless 1st-grade classrooms, swapped the harsh flickering fluorescent lights for full-spectrum bulbs that mimic real daylight… and filmed what happened next. The difference is shocking: hyperactive, off-the-wall kids suddenly calm down, sit still, and focus like never before. The control classrooms under standard lights? Chaos as usual. This is real 1970s footage from Dr. John Ott’s groundbreaking work (1976, Sarasota, FL). His time-lapse cameras caught something schools still ignore: artificial light spectrum and flicker can literally rewire developing brains. Modern science backs it up hard: - 2023 meta-review of 59 studies: kids are WAY more sensitive to light color & timing than adults - Blue-enriched “daylight” lighting improves attention, task-switching, reading fluency - Poor classroom lighting = higher stress, absenteeism, even myopia risk - Natural/full-spectrum light = up to 25% higher test scores in some studies We spend billions on curriculum and tech… but most classrooms still run 1970s prison-grade lighting. Parents, teachers, anyone with kids: watch this clip and tell me this isn’t worth rethinking. The 70s called — they were onto something huge. Who else thinks it’s time for a classroom lighting revolution? Drop your thoughts
1:13

In the 1970s they ran an experiment that still blows minds today. They took four windowless 1st-grade classrooms, swapped the harsh flickering fluorescent lights for full-spectrum bulbs that mimic real daylight… and filmed what happened next. The difference is shocking: hyperactive, off-the-wall kids suddenly calm down, sit still, and focus like never before. The control classrooms under standard lights? Chaos as usual. This is real 1970s footage from Dr. John Ott’s groundbreaking work (1976, Sarasota, FL). His time-lapse cameras caught something schools still ignore: artificial light spectrum and flicker can literally rewire developing brains. Modern science backs it up hard: - 2023 meta-review of 59 studies: kids are WAY more sensitive to light color & timing than adults - Blue-enriched “daylight” lighting improves attention, task-switching, reading fluency - Poor classroom lighting = higher stress, absenteeism, even myopia risk - Natural/full-spectrum light = up to 25% higher test scores in some studies We spend billions on curriculum and tech… but most classrooms still run 1970s prison-grade lighting. Parents, teachers, anyone with kids: watch this clip and tell me this isn’t worth rethinking. The 70s called — they were onto something huge. Who else thinks it’s time for a classroom lighting revolution? Drop your thoughts

Camus

1,527,946 次观看 • 9 个月前

The biggest threat to humanity and nobody has a clue. The U.N. out of all people are even sounding the alarm, and the sad part is, it's already here. Remote Neurotechnology is changing the future. First MK Ultra with our own government, drugs, torture, and sexual abuse, then, which first started out as a secret DARPA project has now reached the commercial sector and will be a standard feature in all upcoming technology, if it isn't already, without you even knowing about it. Why do you think they want smart cities so bad? You'll be hooked up to the "system" and they will know everything about you physically and mentally. Slowly, I've been introducing you to this technology that has been in development since the 1960s, which first started with Professor Delgado's mind control experiment with the raging bull, and electromagnetic remote mind controlled monkey experiments, to it's perfected versions in the 1980s, and now with the help of, RF, ELF, Bluetooth, 5G, electromagnetic radiation, Blue Light, Quantum computers and A.I., remote neural monitoring is here, and has been for some time. They're just publicly coming out now to talk about it. Some of our brightest minds from Harvard, Yale, MIT, and private military contractors have perfected this amazing but absolutely frightening technology. With what is disguised as new, fun, and amazing technology which does have positive benefits, nobody, of course is talking about the other side. The side that not only our intelligence agencies and hacking groups all around the world already have the capabilities of doing, but now Big Tech and advertisers and every other company will now have access to not only see and understand what you are thinking and seeing in your brain, but also capable of planting thoughts, images, and inducing emotions, and behaviors. Blue light technology which is located in every smartphone and computer monitor and T.V. screen also has the ability itself which can regulate dopamine levels, hence why you see the rise is addiction in the younger generations to their phones and other technologies etc. This also goes with tech being developed for "Pre-Crime" identification that the U.K. is already in development with, so you could be charged for thought crimes. Yes, this is real. Jobs will now be able to detect what your thinking about and if your paying attention to the task at hand or day dreaming. The most IMPORTANT thing I am trying to tell you, if you can read between the lines, is that you have to be aware of this technology for a very specific reason. Some of this tech is so sophisticated, and if you are not aware of it you could be tricked into thinking something is happening that really isn't or be induced to do something, or "WITNESS" something happening to you, when in reality it's really just technology. That's how realistic this tech can make you feel by inducing emotions, and behaviors, along with "sounds/voices." Folks, this is important and why Congress is already quietly writing legislation to protect people's privacy and human rights. Please educate yourself and understand that they've already been using this and logging everyone's thoughts and brain patterns to feed the A.I. so it's capable and operational without your knowing consent but quietly slipping in disclosures into most agreements you simply click away on apps you download or products and headphones/devices that you buy, and you don't even know it. Start paying attention to what your signing and why certain things pop up on your feed while you think about them and other strange happenings. There are no coincidences. You've been warned. Check out my Rumble videos for more information on this technology and get educated.
6:43

The biggest threat to humanity and nobody has a clue. The U.N. out of all people are even sounding the alarm, and the sad part is, it's already here. Remote Neurotechnology is changing the future. First MK Ultra with our own government, drugs, torture, and sexual abuse, then, which first started out as a secret DARPA project has now reached the commercial sector and will be a standard feature in all upcoming technology, if it isn't already, without you even knowing about it. Why do you think they want smart cities so bad? You'll be hooked up to the "system" and they will know everything about you physically and mentally. Slowly, I've been introducing you to this technology that has been in development since the 1960s, which first started with Professor Delgado's mind control experiment with the raging bull, and electromagnetic remote mind controlled monkey experiments, to it's perfected versions in the 1980s, and now with the help of, RF, ELF, Bluetooth, 5G, electromagnetic radiation, Blue Light, Quantum computers and A.I., remote neural monitoring is here, and has been for some time. They're just publicly coming out now to talk about it. Some of our brightest minds from Harvard, Yale, MIT, and private military contractors have perfected this amazing but absolutely frightening technology. With what is disguised as new, fun, and amazing technology which does have positive benefits, nobody, of course is talking about the other side. The side that not only our intelligence agencies and hacking groups all around the world already have the capabilities of doing, but now Big Tech and advertisers and every other company will now have access to not only see and understand what you are thinking and seeing in your brain, but also capable of planting thoughts, images, and inducing emotions, and behaviors. Blue light technology which is located in every smartphone and computer monitor and T.V. screen also has the ability itself which can regulate dopamine levels, hence why you see the rise is addiction in the younger generations to their phones and other technologies etc. This also goes with tech being developed for "Pre-Crime" identification that the U.K. is already in development with, so you could be charged for thought crimes. Yes, this is real. Jobs will now be able to detect what your thinking about and if your paying attention to the task at hand or day dreaming. The most IMPORTANT thing I am trying to tell you, if you can read between the lines, is that you have to be aware of this technology for a very specific reason. Some of this tech is so sophisticated, and if you are not aware of it you could be tricked into thinking something is happening that really isn't or be induced to do something, or "WITNESS" something happening to you, when in reality it's really just technology. That's how realistic this tech can make you feel by inducing emotions, and behaviors, along with "sounds/voices." Folks, this is important and why Congress is already quietly writing legislation to protect people's privacy and human rights. Please educate yourself and understand that they've already been using this and logging everyone's thoughts and brain patterns to feed the A.I. so it's capable and operational without your knowing consent but quietly slipping in disclosures into most agreements you simply click away on apps you download or products and headphones/devices that you buy, and you don't even know it. Start paying attention to what your signing and why certain things pop up on your feed while you think about them and other strange happenings. There are no coincidences. You've been warned. Check out my Rumble videos for more information on this technology and get educated.

The SCIF

83,715 次观看 • 1 年前