Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Another 2 Top Ranking Military leaders down. He didn’t conquer enemies abroad. He dismantled power from within. Xi Jin Ping, over 160 generals and scores of communist party elites are taken out, and no one dares to question him. To keep the score, that is more than Sino Japanese... show more

The Great Translation Movement 大翻译运动

243,909 subscribers

58,253 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

One name still haunts China’s military: Liu Yazhou. Once one of the PLA’s most influential generals and a leading military thinker, Liu warned that a war over Taiwan would end in disaster. He questioned Xi Jinping’s ability to command such a war and exposed how defeat destroys morale inside the PLA. For that, he was erased. Watch the full video here:

One name still haunts China’s military: Liu Yazhou. Once one of the PLA’s most influential generals and a leading military thinker, Liu warned that a war over Taiwan would end in disaster. He questioned Xi Jinping’s ability to command such a war and exposed how defeat destroys morale inside the PLA. For that, he was erased. Watch the full video here:

Lei's Real Talk

40,817 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Xi Jinping’s sweeping purges inside China’s military are accelerating. Top generals are disappearing, corruption probes are spreading, and loyalty to Xi now matters more than battlefield readiness. But these purges could weaken the very military Xi wants ready for conflict. What’s really happening inside the Chinese Communist Party—and why is the PLA leadership suddenly vanishing?

Xi Jinping’s sweeping purges inside China’s military are accelerating. Top generals are disappearing, corruption probes are spreading, and loyalty to Xi now matters more than battlefield readiness. But these purges could weaken the very military Xi wants ready for conflict. What’s really happening inside the Chinese Communist Party—and why is the PLA leadership suddenly vanishing?

China Uncensored

18,085 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨Afshin Rattansi: This Is Not Just a War on Iran🇮🇷. This Is a War on BRICS. 'Donald Trump wants to break up BRICS. He said so on Truth Social before. Then he put tariffs on BRICS countries. Then he didn't. But the fact is, Trump is visiting Xi Jinping. So how can he break up BRICS and still smile alongside the head of the Chinese Communist Party?' Have a question for Afshin Rattansi that you want answered on the next episode of New Order? Reply to this with your question about BRICS or the global south, and the city you are from!

🚨Afshin Rattansi: This Is Not Just a War on Iran🇮🇷. This Is a War on BRICS. 'Donald Trump wants to break up BRICS. He said so on Truth Social before. Then he put tariffs on BRICS countries. Then he didn't. But the fact is, Trump is visiting Xi Jinping. So how can he break up BRICS and still smile alongside the head of the Chinese Communist Party?' Have a question for Afshin Rattansi that you want answered on the next episode of New Order? Reply to this with your question about BRICS or the global south, and the city you are from!

New Order with Afshin Rattansi

23,872 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🇷🇺 BROWDER: PUTIN IS TRAPPED BY THE WAR HE STARTED “Putin cannot end the war from his side, because if he were to do so in the current situation, he would probably be removed from power. And if he is removed from power, he’ll end up dying. He’ll be put in jail, his money will be taken away, and he’ll be hanged from a lamppost.” - Bill Browder For Putin, the war is no longer only about Ukraine. It has become a personal survival mechanism, and that makes the Kremlin even more dangerous.

🇷🇺 BROWDER: PUTIN IS TRAPPED BY THE WAR HE STARTED “Putin cannot end the war from his side, because if he were to do so in the current situation, he would probably be removed from power. And if he is removed from power, he’ll end up dying. He’ll be put in jail, his money will be taken away, and he’ll be hanged from a lamppost.” - Bill Browder For Putin, the war is no longer only about Ukraine. It has become a personal survival mechanism, and that makes the Kremlin even more dangerous.

WW3finalboss

13,108 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

@donwill94062871 Megyn Kelly Sean Spicer Yes here is a short sound clip of exactly what you’re referring to. The military generals hated him because he was against the war and didn’t take their advice. Sean worked with Trump and he witnessed it firsthand

@donwill94062871 Megyn Kelly Sean Spicer Yes here is a short sound clip of exactly what you’re referring to. The military generals hated him because he was against the war and didn’t take their advice. Sean worked with Trump and he witnessed it firsthand

fixnow

73,886 просмотров • 1 год назад

Browder: Putin is not going to seek an endgame for one reason: he needs a war, a foreign enemy, so that people don't get mad at him inside Russia. This war is now only about Putin's personal survival. He needs the war to stay in power, and he needs to stay in power to survive.

Browder: Putin is not going to seek an endgame for one reason: he needs a war, a foreign enemy, so that people don't get mad at him inside Russia. This war is now only about Putin's personal survival. He needs the war to stay in power, and he needs to stay in power to survive.

Kate from Kharkiv

38,503 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Garry Kasparov unleashes the truth: putin’s war is pure survival, not strategy. Garry Kasparov nails it: putin isn't some rational leader. He's a dictator obsessed with staying in power for 25 years and counting. This war? It's his life support, infecting every part of Russia. Forget ideology, he is a one-man mafia boss, desperate to project strength. He won't stop until he declares 'victory,' which he can't get, so he'll just keep expanding the war. He literally couldn't care less about how many Russians die as long as he controls Moscow and St. Petersburg. Trump even offered him an 'out' twice, and putin rejected it because it would make him look weak - and weakness means the whole flock turns on him. He's even eyeing a test of NATO's Article 5 and hoping his far-right buddies take over Europe. The West's slow reaction and constant reliance on America has just emboldened him. Kasparov is right, the only thing that changes Russia is a Ukrainian victory, and fast. Garry Kasparov: I hate starting to talk with criticism but this time I have to point out that your question basically repeated the same mistake in evaluation because you tried to analyze putin’s actions from the position of the responsible national leader. Everything you said is absolutely correct. vladimir's putin’s rule is devastating for Russia and I believe it will end to the collapse of the Russian Empire which is long overdue. But vladimir putin’s calculations are not based on this rational thinking. His view is very different. He is in power for 25 years and counting. That’s all that matters for him. He’s a dictator and he works for one thing: only survival. He’s still there. And the war has become the only way to keep him in power. War now is in every layer of Russian society, from the very top of the government to industries all the way down to kindergartens. It’s infected by the war virus and that's how putin stays in power. Interviewer: So that makes him different from let's say Soviet leaders or or even some of the tsar’s right? Again you should look at Soviet leaders based on the political momentum, just obviously Soviet leaders that we remember, you and me, so like Brezhnev, they had different calculations. But also don't forget the Soviet leaders after Stalin. They were ruling the country that had strong ideology and communist party. I'm not here to advocate for the communist party or for any kind of ideology but there's a fundamental difference between the party rule which is a mafia structure and the one man dictatorship. putin shifted Russia to a one man dictatorship where everything depends on an individual who is on the top of power, who becomes at certain time a spine of the whole system. And this system depends on his survival, demonstrating his strengths is to be a macho, to be an alpha, surrounded by other mafia bosses. And that's why, you know, his current position today is, you may call it desperate, but I don't think he he sees it the same way. He will continue the war as long as he has the resources. And this is something that the free world is just getting to understand. That was my main criticism to the west. vladimir putin, for a long time was at open war, those were hybrid at the time with the free world. And the free world, and especially Europe, was not willing to hear the messages, to see the messages and to respond accordingly. 1/2

Garry Kasparov unleashes the truth: putin’s war is pure survival, not strategy. Garry Kasparov nails it: putin isn't some rational leader. He's a dictator obsessed with staying in power for 25 years and counting. This war? It's his life support, infecting every part of Russia. Forget ideology, he is a one-man mafia boss, desperate to project strength. He won't stop until he declares 'victory,' which he can't get, so he'll just keep expanding the war. He literally couldn't care less about how many Russians die as long as he controls Moscow and St. Petersburg. Trump even offered him an 'out' twice, and putin rejected it because it would make him look weak - and weakness means the whole flock turns on him. He's even eyeing a test of NATO's Article 5 and hoping his far-right buddies take over Europe. The West's slow reaction and constant reliance on America has just emboldened him. Kasparov is right, the only thing that changes Russia is a Ukrainian victory, and fast. Garry Kasparov: I hate starting to talk with criticism but this time I have to point out that your question basically repeated the same mistake in evaluation because you tried to analyze putin’s actions from the position of the responsible national leader. Everything you said is absolutely correct. vladimir's putin’s rule is devastating for Russia and I believe it will end to the collapse of the Russian Empire which is long overdue. But vladimir putin’s calculations are not based on this rational thinking. His view is very different. He is in power for 25 years and counting. That’s all that matters for him. He’s a dictator and he works for one thing: only survival. He’s still there. And the war has become the only way to keep him in power. War now is in every layer of Russian society, from the very top of the government to industries all the way down to kindergartens. It’s infected by the war virus and that's how putin stays in power. Interviewer: So that makes him different from let's say Soviet leaders or or even some of the tsar’s right? Again you should look at Soviet leaders based on the political momentum, just obviously Soviet leaders that we remember, you and me, so like Brezhnev, they had different calculations. But also don't forget the Soviet leaders after Stalin. They were ruling the country that had strong ideology and communist party. I'm not here to advocate for the communist party or for any kind of ideology but there's a fundamental difference between the party rule which is a mafia structure and the one man dictatorship. putin shifted Russia to a one man dictatorship where everything depends on an individual who is on the top of power, who becomes at certain time a spine of the whole system. And this system depends on his survival, demonstrating his strengths is to be a macho, to be an alpha, surrounded by other mafia bosses. And that's why, you know, his current position today is, you may call it desperate, but I don't think he he sees it the same way. He will continue the war as long as he has the resources. And this is something that the free world is just getting to understand. That was my main criticism to the west. vladimir putin, for a long time was at open war, those were hybrid at the time with the free world. And the free world, and especially Europe, was not willing to hear the messages, to see the messages and to respond accordingly. 1/2

Yasmina

301,112 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

REPORT: Secretary of War Pete Hegseth gathered top military leaders at Quantico and delivered a message they won’t forget: the era of weakness is over, and the new mission of the War Department is clear—prepare for war. He made it clear that this is not about seeking conflict but about preserving peace through strength, warning that pacifism is naïve and only a disciplined, battle-ready force can deter America’s enemies. Hegseth rolled out 10 sweeping directives. Every service member will be held to the highest male combat standard, fitness tests will be mandatory twice a year, and strict height and weight requirements will be enforced. “Fat generals and admirals” are no longer acceptable, he said. Woke language and quotas are gone, basic training will return to being tough and uncompromising, and promotions will be earned through merit, not politics. Hegseth compared these reforms to those before World War II, raising a chilling question: with tensions rising across the globe, is the US bracing for another major conflict? Watch the full episode:👇

REPORT: Secretary of War Pete Hegseth gathered top military leaders at Quantico and delivered a message they won’t forget: the era of weakness is over, and the new mission of the War Department is clear—prepare for war. He made it clear that this is not about seeking conflict but about preserving peace through strength, warning that pacifism is naïve and only a disciplined, battle-ready force can deter America’s enemies. Hegseth rolled out 10 sweeping directives. Every service member will be held to the highest male combat standard, fitness tests will be mandatory twice a year, and strict height and weight requirements will be enforced. “Fat generals and admirals” are no longer acceptable, he said. Woke language and quotas are gone, basic training will return to being tough and uncompromising, and promotions will be earned through merit, not politics. Hegseth compared these reforms to those before World War II, raising a chilling question: with tensions rising across the globe, is the US bracing for another major conflict? Watch the full episode:👇

Vigilant Fox 🦊

50,995 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Scott Jennings just EMBARRASSED Tim Walz live on CNN — using Walz’s own rhetoric. Walz once again reached for Civil War imagery today, comparing what’s happening in Minnesota to Fort Sumter. The only problem is that he didn’t think through what that analogy actually implies. As Jennings pointed out, if Minnesota is Fort Sumter, Walz isn’t Abraham Lincoln...he’s Jefferson Davis. Scott Jennings: “He said today that he thought maybe this was like the next Fort Sumter.” “Walz said that and previously he had referenced the Battle of Gettysburg.” “And so when I hear that kind of language coming out of a governor, this sort of fantasizing about an American Civil War…first of all, I don’t think he stopped to consider who that makes him in this entire endeavor.” “Jefferson Davis spoiler alert!” “And number two, if you wanted more calm, if you wanted a little bit more cooperation, if you wanted to ratchet things down, you would not be referencing the first shots of the Civil War and maybe thinking that we’re in the middle of another one.”

Scott Jennings just EMBARRASSED Tim Walz live on CNN — using Walz’s own rhetoric. Walz once again reached for Civil War imagery today, comparing what’s happening in Minnesota to Fort Sumter. The only problem is that he didn’t think through what that analogy actually implies. As Jennings pointed out, if Minnesota is Fort Sumter, Walz isn’t Abraham Lincoln...he’s Jefferson Davis. Scott Jennings: “He said today that he thought maybe this was like the next Fort Sumter.” “Walz said that and previously he had referenced the Battle of Gettysburg.” “And so when I hear that kind of language coming out of a governor, this sort of fantasizing about an American Civil War…first of all, I don’t think he stopped to consider who that makes him in this entire endeavor.” “Jefferson Davis spoiler alert!” “And number two, if you wanted more calm, if you wanted a little bit more cooperation, if you wanted to ratchet things down, you would not be referencing the first shots of the Civil War and maybe thinking that we’re in the middle of another one.”

Overton

460,810 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Zelensky is Ukraine’s Maduro. In reality, he leads a narco-style network — a militarized structure that has taken control of the state, effectively seized power, and continues to destroy Ukraine. Parliament keeps extending martial law despite the fact that Ukraine has no real chance of continuing the war. The situation with desertions and people being hunted down is catastrophic. There is no real military support from either the United States or Europe, and most importantly, there is no money left to keep the war going. #Ukraine #Peace #Trump

Zelensky is Ukraine’s Maduro. In reality, he leads a narco-style network — a militarized structure that has taken control of the state, effectively seized power, and continues to destroy Ukraine. Parliament keeps extending martial law despite the fact that Ukraine has no real chance of continuing the war. The situation with desertions and people being hunted down is catastrophic. There is no real military support from either the United States or Europe, and most importantly, there is no money left to keep the war going. #Ukraine #Peace #Trump

Oleksandr Dubinskyi

11,422 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

“I believe that President Trump is going after the Chinese…he's cutting off their sources of support.” The US-Israel strikes on Iran are reshaping the global balance of power—and Beijing is feeling the heat,” says Gordon G. Chang “Mao [Zedong] boasted that he won the Chinese Civil War because he encircled the cities from the countryside…Well, Trump has just taken that same policy and applied it against China. …Venezuela and Iran are the countryside, and China is the city."

“I believe that President Trump is going after the Chinese…he's cutting off their sources of support.” The US-Israel strikes on Iran are reshaping the global balance of power—and Beijing is feeling the heat,” says Gordon G. Chang “Mao [Zedong] boasted that he won the Chinese Civil War because he encircled the cities from the countryside…Well, Trump has just taken that same policy and applied it against China. …Venezuela and Iran are the countryside, and China is the city."

Jan Jekielek

52,412 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

We are in the fifth month of the first year of Trump’s endless war with Iran. Now, he is asking for billions of taxpayer dollars to keep fighting, even as this war makes your groceries, gas, and power more expensive.

We are in the fifth month of the first year of Trump’s endless war with Iran. Now, he is asking for billions of taxpayer dollars to keep fighting, even as this war makes your groceries, gas, and power more expensive.

Senator Dick Durbin

16,214 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🇺🇸 DALIO: “WE’RE IN A FINANCIAL, TECHNOLOGY, AND CIVIL WAR” Billionaire and Bridgewater founder Ray Dalio says surging debt, global conflict, and inequality are creating a pre–WWII vibe. He likens rising debt to plaque in the arteries, squeezing out spending and pushing the economy toward crisis. Dalio isn’t ruling out a “civil war of some sort” in the US if deep divides aren’t addressed. Dalio: “We're in war. There is a financial money war. There's a technology war. There is geopolitical wars. And there are more military wars. And so, we have a civil war of some sort, which is developing in the United States and elsewhere where there are irreconcilable differences.” Source: Bloomberg

🇺🇸 DALIO: “WE’RE IN A FINANCIAL, TECHNOLOGY, AND CIVIL WAR” Billionaire and Bridgewater founder Ray Dalio says surging debt, global conflict, and inequality are creating a pre–WWII vibe. He likens rising debt to plaque in the arteries, squeezing out spending and pushing the economy toward crisis. Dalio isn’t ruling out a “civil war of some sort” in the US if deep divides aren’t addressed. Dalio: “We're in war. There is a financial money war. There's a technology war. There is geopolitical wars. And there are more military wars. And so, we have a civil war of some sort, which is developing in the United States and elsewhere where there are irreconcilable differences.” Source: Bloomberg

Mario Nawfal

111,120 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

I think the Commander in Chief just briefed his Generals for war. But most importantly, he MADE SURE THE PUBLIC SAW IT! The message being delivered was not for the Generals. It was for We the People. The US MIL are about to (publicly) go to war with the enemy from within. The Commander in Chief just reminded his Military leadership of their sacred Oath, which is to defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and DOMESTIC. I believe Trump and the US MIL are about to save the Republic.

I think the Commander in Chief just briefed his Generals for war. But most importantly, he MADE SURE THE PUBLIC SAW IT! The message being delivered was not for the Generals. It was for We the People. The US MIL are about to (publicly) go to war with the enemy from within. The Commander in Chief just reminded his Military leadership of their sacred Oath, which is to defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and DOMESTIC. I believe Trump and the US MIL are about to save the Republic.

Clandestine

1,944,214 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

I think the Commander in Chief just briefed his Generals for war. But most importantly, he MADE SURE THE PUBLIC SAW IT! The message being delivered was not for the Generals. It was for We the People. The US MIL are about to (publicly) go to war with the enemy from within. The Commander in Chief just reminded his Military leadership of their sacred Oath, which is to defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and DOMESTIC. I believe Trump and the US MIL are about to save the Republic.

I think the Commander in Chief just briefed his Generals for war. But most importantly, he MADE SURE THE PUBLIC SAW IT! The message being delivered was not for the Generals. It was for We the People. The US MIL are about to (publicly) go to war with the enemy from within. The Commander in Chief just reminded his Military leadership of their sacred Oath, which is to defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and DOMESTIC. I believe Trump and the US MIL are about to save the Republic.

Whiplash347

47,000 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

War Diary Day 1,469 Trump’s war against Iran is foolish. He has learnt nothing from Russia’s evil war against Ukraine. Drones rule. Iran has thousands of them. There is a limit to US power. The prices of oil and gas are rocketing and Putin is the beneficiary of that. #DTDFO! #VPDFO!

War Diary Day 1,469 Trump’s war against Iran is foolish. He has learnt nothing from Russia’s evil war against Ukraine. Drones rule. Iran has thousands of them. There is a limit to US power. The prices of oil and gas are rocketing and Putin is the beneficiary of that. #DTDFO! #VPDFO!

John Sweeney

35,282 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Pakistani soldiers have reached their breaking point in Balochistan. Many of them now realize that this war is not their war, and that this land is not their land. They believe that only high-ranking generals benefit, while ordinary soldiers are nothing more than victims. Pakistan does not care about their lives. This was expressed by a soldier who recorded himself, saying he would resign and leave Balochistan. He knows this will anger the generals who plunder Balochistan’s resources. He added that he can no longer bring himself to kill innocent and women. #Balochistan #Baloch #herof2 #PakArmy

Pakistani soldiers have reached their breaking point in Balochistan. Many of them now realize that this war is not their war, and that this land is not their land. They believe that only high-ranking generals benefit, while ordinary soldiers are nothing more than victims. Pakistan does not care about their lives. This was expressed by a soldier who recorded himself, saying he would resign and leave Balochistan. He knows this will anger the generals who plunder Balochistan’s resources. He added that he can no longer bring himself to kill innocent and women. #Balochistan #Baloch #herof2 #PakArmy

Omar Baloch

56,282 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

“Even if you follow Xi Jinping, you still will be purged. So the hidden rule is broken. I think that will be the end of the whole system,” says China analyst Heng He. With the recent purges of two top military generals, Zhang Youxia and Liu Zhenli, five of the seven members of China’s Central Military Commission have effectively been purged or removed. Only two remain, one of which is Xi Jinping himself. Zhang Youxia is known to have been a longtime ally of Xi Jinping, but was purged nonetheless. The CCP, like a mafia, is governed by unwritten rules. Now, Xi Jinping has broken all the CCP’s hidden rules, He says. “Now nobody knows whom to trust,” and that’s a big problem for the CCP. Xi has essentially purged the two remaining generals with actual battlefield experience. The Chinese military, Heng explains, is different from armed forces in the rest of the world. It’s ruled by the Chinese Communist Party and its primary function has been to protect the Communist Party—not to fight wars overseas. The CCP’s leaders, he explains, depend on the protection of the military, but at the same time they do not trust the military: “They are afraid that they will turn the gun to the wrong side.” But, in order to conquer Taiwan which, Heng tells me, is Xi’s lifelong dream, the generals must be put in full control: “Xi Jinping cannot fight himself, right? He has to give the command to the military leaders. That means the military has the power to turn the gun backwards.” With the removal of General Zhang Youxia—who appears to have opposed Xi Jinping’s views on an invasion of Taiwan—Xi removed an obstacle - but at what price? “The chain of command in the military is totally broken…This never happened in the history of communist rule,” he said.

“Even if you follow Xi Jinping, you still will be purged. So the hidden rule is broken. I think that will be the end of the whole system,” says China analyst Heng He. With the recent purges of two top military generals, Zhang Youxia and Liu Zhenli, five of the seven members of China’s Central Military Commission have effectively been purged or removed. Only two remain, one of which is Xi Jinping himself. Zhang Youxia is known to have been a longtime ally of Xi Jinping, but was purged nonetheless. The CCP, like a mafia, is governed by unwritten rules. Now, Xi Jinping has broken all the CCP’s hidden rules, He says. “Now nobody knows whom to trust,” and that’s a big problem for the CCP. Xi has essentially purged the two remaining generals with actual battlefield experience. The Chinese military, Heng explains, is different from armed forces in the rest of the world. It’s ruled by the Chinese Communist Party and its primary function has been to protect the Communist Party—not to fight wars overseas. The CCP’s leaders, he explains, depend on the protection of the military, but at the same time they do not trust the military: “They are afraid that they will turn the gun to the wrong side.” But, in order to conquer Taiwan which, Heng tells me, is Xi’s lifelong dream, the generals must be put in full control: “Xi Jinping cannot fight himself, right? He has to give the command to the military leaders. That means the military has the power to turn the gun backwards.” With the removal of General Zhang Youxia—who appears to have opposed Xi Jinping’s views on an invasion of Taiwan—Xi removed an obstacle - but at what price? “The chain of command in the military is totally broken…This never happened in the history of communist rule,” he said.

Jan Jekielek

47,416 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

NEW: David Sacks says Democrats now support endless war, Zelensky wants the war to never end, and Joe Biden could have easily stopped the war in its first month by agreeing to the Istanbul Accords. "Zelensky basically says the war needs to go on forever. If the war is over, he loses power. He canceled elections there. If he stands for elections there, he's very unpopular, despite what the fake USAID polls say." "The Democrats have become the Party of forever war. Remember this was Joe Biden's war. He easily could have ended this war in the first month if he agreed to the Istanbul Accords, which said that all Ukraine had to do was stay neutral and basically agree not to become part of NATO. Biden said that was unacceptable, and that's why the war continued." "Then Biden said we have to support Ukraine in this war for as long as it takes as much as it takes, and that's what the Democrats are doing. They want to keep spending hundreds and hundreds of billions of dollars. They want this to keep going and going, but that's not in the American interest." "What benefit are we getting out of all this money that we are sending to Ukraine? What benefits are the Ukrainians getting? Hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians are dying, and they're not winning this war. They're losing this war. What is so wrong with letting President Trump try to negotiate a peace deal?"

NEW: David Sacks says Democrats now support endless war, Zelensky wants the war to never end, and Joe Biden could have easily stopped the war in its first month by agreeing to the Istanbul Accords. "Zelensky basically says the war needs to go on forever. If the war is over, he loses power. He canceled elections there. If he stands for elections there, he's very unpopular, despite what the fake USAID polls say." "The Democrats have become the Party of forever war. Remember this was Joe Biden's war. He easily could have ended this war in the first month if he agreed to the Istanbul Accords, which said that all Ukraine had to do was stay neutral and basically agree not to become part of NATO. Biden said that was unacceptable, and that's why the war continued." "Then Biden said we have to support Ukraine in this war for as long as it takes as much as it takes, and that's what the Democrats are doing. They want to keep spending hundreds and hundreds of billions of dollars. They want this to keep going and going, but that's not in the American interest." "What benefit are we getting out of all this money that we are sending to Ukraine? What benefits are the Ukrainians getting? Hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians are dying, and they're not winning this war. They're losing this war. What is so wrong with letting President Trump try to negotiate a peace deal?"

KanekoaTheGreat

1,985,888 просмотров • 1 год назад