Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Another defamation case in the works? Ok. Will not apologize. Will not delete. But will apologise and delete if: 1) Institution of national repute will put out a public statement that they will ensure all patients - from all wakes of life will be treated with evidence-based scientific medicine...

theliverdoc's profile picture

TheLiverDoc™

322,540 subscribers

42,797 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Здоровье и велнесНовости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 11

Фото профиля 𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑢
𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑢1 год назад

don't know what to say ... it's a difficult cause you have taken up .. in a nation where we derive vicarious pleasure in our achievements of 5000 years ago ... we have hardly any commitment to the sciences ... the nation looks more lost than ever

Фото профиля Daughters of Persia
Daughters of Persia1 год назад

22 women in Iran’s Evin Prison are being subjected to sexual abuse during brutal body searches. Their open letter exposes the horrors: humiliation, assault, and dehumanization. They risk torture for speaking out. How much longer will the world ignore their screams? @IranIntl_En

Фото профиля Karan T
Karan T1 год назад

Hey Doc, I just noticed 'BPL' written on the prescription. Is it possible that NIMHANS is following two lines of treatment depending on one's ability to pay? For folks who pay regular rates, they prescribe the normal allopathic line of treatment, and for the below-poverty-line patients, they prescribe this garbage. If this is the case, then it exacerbates the issue.

Фото профиля TheLiverDoc
TheLiverDoc1 год назад

More questions than answers I am afraid!

Фото профиля GauravB
GauravB1 год назад

Always backing @theliverdr coz he deserves it.

Фото профиля Georgy Thomas
Georgy Thomas1 год назад

Admire your courage. You are doing great public service.

Фото профиля Jigsawfallingintoplaces
Jigsawfallingintoplaces1 год назад

Full supprt

Фото профиля The Indifferent Indian
The Indifferent Indian1 год назад

Take them to the cleaners

Фото профиля Dr Generation Uno
Dr Generation Uno1 год назад

Bjp single handedly destroyed our medical field. Proud of what you are doing sir. Just remember, you have people backing you

Фото профиля Yash Goyal
Yash Goyal1 год назад

One day , i am afraid it will cost you ,your license. You are not a part of group but an individual. Least i can follow u on insta

Фото профиля Hemanta Saikia
Hemanta Saikia1 год назад

More power to you Sir

Похожие видео

Doctors' leaders say the NHS is 'gambling' with patient safety by using staff who are not doctors in frontline roles and without the knowledge of patients. Physician and Anasthesia Associates are healthcare professionals used to support doctors, but they can work unsupervised.
2:56

Doctors' leaders say the NHS is 'gambling' with patient safety by using staff who are not doctors in frontline roles and without the knowledge of patients. Physician and Anasthesia Associates are healthcare professionals used to support doctors, but they can work unsupervised.

Good Morning Britain

449,985 просмотров • 1 год назад

The public is ignorant of how Doctors are controlled and persecuted if they stray out of their lane. The medical regulators, who are far from protecting patients, are endangering them. They serve Big Pharma and Governments, NOT YOU.
1:18

The public is ignorant of how Doctors are controlled and persecuted if they stray out of their lane. The medical regulators, who are far from protecting patients, are endangering them. They serve Big Pharma and Governments, NOT YOU.

Doc Malik

20,117 просмотров • 1 год назад

EVERYONE NEEDS TO SEE THIS 🚨 American doctor exposes new internal change to Blue Cross prior authorization process to deny coverage for Americans - They’ll only speak to the doctor who put in request - They WONT SAY WHAT NUMBER THEY’RE CALLING FROM - They’ll ONLY CALL ONCE - If they miss the call, the patient will be denied coverage for treatment “Now Blue Cross is saying that they will only do their peer to peer reviews by calling the doctor who is asking for the treatment to be authorized. And they will only call once, and they won't tell you when they're calling, and they won't tell you what number they're calling from.” “So if you're a doctor seeing patients and you have your phone on do not disturb because you're seeing patients or you just don't answer numbers that you don't recognize, and you're seeing patients and you don't wanna interrupt a a patient visit, you're gonna miss the call. And guess what? The treatment will not be authorized” “They're getting more creative about how to deny your claims or just not authorize your treatment at all. I'm going on information given to me by Blue Cross. I am a physician. When we physicians ask for a treatment to be authorized by an insurance company and they deny authorization, what happens at that point is that we are asked to do a peer to peer review, meaning that we, the doctor asking for the treatment, have to speak with the doctor who is employed by the insurance company, who is there only to say no.” THIS IS INSANE
1:51

EVERYONE NEEDS TO SEE THIS 🚨 American doctor exposes new internal change to Blue Cross prior authorization process to deny coverage for Americans - They’ll only speak to the doctor who put in request - They WONT SAY WHAT NUMBER THEY’RE CALLING FROM - They’ll ONLY CALL ONCE - If they miss the call, the patient will be denied coverage for treatment “Now Blue Cross is saying that they will only do their peer to peer reviews by calling the doctor who is asking for the treatment to be authorized. And they will only call once, and they won't tell you when they're calling, and they won't tell you what number they're calling from.” “So if you're a doctor seeing patients and you have your phone on do not disturb because you're seeing patients or you just don't answer numbers that you don't recognize, and you're seeing patients and you don't wanna interrupt a a patient visit, you're gonna miss the call. And guess what? The treatment will not be authorized” “They're getting more creative about how to deny your claims or just not authorize your treatment at all. I'm going on information given to me by Blue Cross. I am a physician. When we physicians ask for a treatment to be authorized by an insurance company and they deny authorization, what happens at that point is that we are asked to do a peer to peer review, meaning that we, the doctor asking for the treatment, have to speak with the doctor who is employed by the insurance company, who is there only to say no.” THIS IS INSANE

Wall Street Apes

1,465,549 просмотров • 1 год назад

11 patients died within 24 hours at Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research in Mysuru #Karnataka Medical Superintendent Dr. Sadananda clarified all 11 were already in critical condition at the time of admission, and that no patient died due to a shortage of doctors or lack of treatment He stated three doctors were on night duty and offered CCTV footage for verification. The hospital however, is operating under severe strain. Doctors are attending to over 100 patients a day against a normal load of 50 to 60 All beds are full, with 20 patients currently being treated on trolleys. The facility caters not just to Mysuru but also to patients from Kodagu, Hassan, Mandya and Chamarajanagar districts Relatives of the deceased alleged that patients were dying due to the absence of doctors and poor facilities
5:59

11 patients died within 24 hours at Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research in Mysuru #Karnataka Medical Superintendent Dr. Sadananda clarified all 11 were already in critical condition at the time of admission, and that no patient died due to a shortage of doctors or lack of treatment He stated three doctors were on night duty and offered CCTV footage for verification. The hospital however, is operating under severe strain. Doctors are attending to over 100 patients a day against a normal load of 50 to 60 All beds are full, with 20 patients currently being treated on trolleys. The facility caters not just to Mysuru but also to patients from Kodagu, Hassan, Mandya and Chamarajanagar districts Relatives of the deceased alleged that patients were dying due to the absence of doctors and poor facilities

Nabila Jamal

244,912 просмотров • 22 дней назад

American Surgeon shows the actual letter from UnitedHealthcare DENYING a patient in emergency condition from receiving care “This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms” “I think we all knew this would happen. I had another patient come in and share with me that UnitedHealthcare denied her inpatient's day. So this is a patient who had shortness of breath and some chest pain, and she just knew that something wasn't right in her body. She had a family history of blood clots and she'd had a deep flap surgery a couple of weeks ago. She went to the hospital and they saw her and they found that she had a life threatening condition known as pulmonary embolisms. So she was admitted to the hospital and taken care of really well by the doctors there. And they ordered all the right things. After a couple of days, she was discharged. She got a letter from UnitedHealthcare explaining that they didn't agree with the level of her care and that they would not cover it. So I'm gonna share some of the language of that letter with you, and I want you to know that my patient that we talked about previously who had her surgery denied had almost exactly the same letter shared. So there's some troubling things in this letter. I think this term is really interesting. United is saying they reviewed the request for inpatient admission. So let's all just pause and consider that. This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms, and the doctor wasn't really requesting anything. They were saying this patient needs to be in the hospital. But an insurance company sees this as a request, and that's part of this prior auth environment that we're living in. So I think it's important as patients and as physicians to just acknowledge that this is our reality now. Someone can think that there's a good medical decision for you and can write orders and wanna do the right thing for you, but your insurance company is seeing that as a request and deciding whether or not they wanna do it. One of the criteria that this insurance company used to decide whether or not to accept or deny this request was whether it's medically necessary. And it's so interesting that we're letting insurance companies and the doctors who work for insurance companies determine what's medically necessary and not just the doctor in front of the patient in the emergency room. So this is a really bold statement from UnitedHealthcare for my patient. They say you did not have to be admitted as an inpatient to the hospital for this care. I think we all need to just reflect on that. An insurance company is telling a patient and her doctor that they disagree with the plan of care to keep that patient safe. I know that this is boiling down to whether it's an inpatient admission or an observation admission, and that's really about money. But what I wanna point out to you is they're making medical decisions. This insurance company is actually weighing in and disagreeing with a doctor who made a medical decision to admit this patient for her safety. So this specific sentence, when a doctor or facility treats a patient above the recommended level of care, we cannot cover it. What the heck? That's what we do. We go above and beyond as physicians. It's clear that insurance companies don't, and they're actually saying it here.”
2:35

American Surgeon shows the actual letter from UnitedHealthcare DENYING a patient in emergency condition from receiving care “This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms” “I think we all knew this would happen. I had another patient come in and share with me that UnitedHealthcare denied her inpatient's day. So this is a patient who had shortness of breath and some chest pain, and she just knew that something wasn't right in her body. She had a family history of blood clots and she'd had a deep flap surgery a couple of weeks ago. She went to the hospital and they saw her and they found that she had a life threatening condition known as pulmonary embolisms. So she was admitted to the hospital and taken care of really well by the doctors there. And they ordered all the right things. After a couple of days, she was discharged. She got a letter from UnitedHealthcare explaining that they didn't agree with the level of her care and that they would not cover it. So I'm gonna share some of the language of that letter with you, and I want you to know that my patient that we talked about previously who had her surgery denied had almost exactly the same letter shared. So there's some troubling things in this letter. I think this term is really interesting. United is saying they reviewed the request for inpatient admission. So let's all just pause and consider that. This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms, and the doctor wasn't really requesting anything. They were saying this patient needs to be in the hospital. But an insurance company sees this as a request, and that's part of this prior auth environment that we're living in. So I think it's important as patients and as physicians to just acknowledge that this is our reality now. Someone can think that there's a good medical decision for you and can write orders and wanna do the right thing for you, but your insurance company is seeing that as a request and deciding whether or not they wanna do it. One of the criteria that this insurance company used to decide whether or not to accept or deny this request was whether it's medically necessary. And it's so interesting that we're letting insurance companies and the doctors who work for insurance companies determine what's medically necessary and not just the doctor in front of the patient in the emergency room. So this is a really bold statement from UnitedHealthcare for my patient. They say you did not have to be admitted as an inpatient to the hospital for this care. I think we all need to just reflect on that. An insurance company is telling a patient and her doctor that they disagree with the plan of care to keep that patient safe. I know that this is boiling down to whether it's an inpatient admission or an observation admission, and that's really about money. But what I wanna point out to you is they're making medical decisions. This insurance company is actually weighing in and disagreeing with a doctor who made a medical decision to admit this patient for her safety. So this specific sentence, when a doctor or facility treats a patient above the recommended level of care, we cannot cover it. What the heck? That's what we do. We go above and beyond as physicians. It's clear that insurance companies don't, and they're actually saying it here.”

Wall Street Apes

115,691 просмотров • 1 год назад

The greatest casualty of modern medicine isn’t innovation or access—it’s the doctor-patient relationship. Insurance companies and government middlemen have hijacked healthcare. Patients don’t trust doctors, and doctors no longer serve patients. We must fix this.
0:42

The greatest casualty of modern medicine isn’t innovation or access—it’s the doctor-patient relationship. Insurance companies and government middlemen have hijacked healthcare. Patients don’t trust doctors, and doctors no longer serve patients. We must fix this.

Dr. Simone Gold

64,692 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 A court case shows some doctors complained about patients asking questions on vaccines. Kim Rosenberg calls out this disturbing mindset. “There was an order in that AAP case in Boston where the judge said that some of the papers… included declarations or affidavits from doctors saying, ‘Well, if I have to have a conversation with a patient about vaccines… I can’t see as many patients. I’m damaged because I can’t make as much money.’” “Money was the focus versus informed consent and helping their patients navigate that choice.” Kim Mack Rosenberg
0:55

🚨 A court case shows some doctors complained about patients asking questions on vaccines. Kim Rosenberg calls out this disturbing mindset. “There was an order in that AAP case in Boston where the judge said that some of the papers… included declarations or affidavits from doctors saying, ‘Well, if I have to have a conversation with a patient about vaccines… I can’t see as many patients. I’m damaged because I can’t make as much money.’” “Money was the focus versus informed consent and helping their patients navigate that choice.” Kim Mack Rosenberg

Children’s Health Defense

19,676 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Dr. Tarek Loubani, an emergency room medical doctor who has been volunteering in Gaza for months, describes the state of the starvation. He says that all of the thousands if not tens of thousands of severely malnourished Palestinians in Gaza will die: "The amount of food that has been coming in has progressively dwindled to the point that now when I see patients, almost everybody is starving. Really truly, every patient who I see, I can clearly make out their spine. I can make out their scapula, their shoulder blades. I can see how much weight they've lost, the skin that's hanging off of them. That shows me what they used to look like before the war..." "...But every single Palestinian who I see at this point, their body looks emaciated. Like I described to you, you can see clearly the bones going through the skin. You can see clearly the impacts. At this point, the people who are severely malnourished, they will die. they will all die. That is thousands if not tens of thousands of people. And that's not because it's impossible to fix their problem. That's because Israel will not allow us the materials and the supplies that we need to fix their problem." Source:
1:01

Dr. Tarek Loubani, an emergency room medical doctor who has been volunteering in Gaza for months, describes the state of the starvation. He says that all of the thousands if not tens of thousands of severely malnourished Palestinians in Gaza will die: "The amount of food that has been coming in has progressively dwindled to the point that now when I see patients, almost everybody is starving. Really truly, every patient who I see, I can clearly make out their spine. I can make out their scapula, their shoulder blades. I can see how much weight they've lost, the skin that's hanging off of them. That shows me what they used to look like before the war..." "...But every single Palestinian who I see at this point, their body looks emaciated. Like I described to you, you can see clearly the bones going through the skin. You can see clearly the impacts. At this point, the people who are severely malnourished, they will die. they will all die. That is thousands if not tens of thousands of people. And that's not because it's impossible to fix their problem. That's because Israel will not allow us the materials and the supplies that we need to fix their problem." Source:

Zachary Foster

22,318 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

2026: A patient reached out to me yesterday to let me know about a concerning interaction with a hospital system. The patient was scheduled for a therapeutic procedure, in advance of surgery. Arrangements were made and the patient paid their estimated portion of the cost. Then they received a call from the facility asking them whether they still had the same insurance. When the patient confirmed that nothing had changed, they received a warning from the facility that the estimate no longer applied and costs could go up…significantly. Why? Because the hospital system is renegotiating with the insurance company. Not because the clinical situation changed, not because the procedure became more complex…just because the patient is caught in the middle of a business negotiation without an advocate. So they called me. And I’m telling all of you. So we can help one another by insisting that patients come first. Always.
0:36

2026: A patient reached out to me yesterday to let me know about a concerning interaction with a hospital system. The patient was scheduled for a therapeutic procedure, in advance of surgery. Arrangements were made and the patient paid their estimated portion of the cost. Then they received a call from the facility asking them whether they still had the same insurance. When the patient confirmed that nothing had changed, they received a warning from the facility that the estimate no longer applied and costs could go up…significantly. Why? Because the hospital system is renegotiating with the insurance company. Not because the clinical situation changed, not because the procedure became more complex…just because the patient is caught in the middle of a business negotiation without an advocate. So they called me. And I’m telling all of you. So we can help one another by insisting that patients come first. Always.

Elisabeth Potter MD

55,057 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

A 24 year old man dislocated his jaw after a "deep yawn" while on a train to Dibrugarh. He was treated and cured immediately by the Railway Hospital surgeon - a doctor trained in MBBS and specialised in MS ENT speciality. Now imagine if the only "doctor" in the train or nearby was an Ayurveda or Homeopathy 'specialist', could they have helped this patient? Absolutely not. Because they are not really doctors, and they are incompetent in helping patients. These incidents are what people with real medical training do on a daily basis. Only pseudoscience peddlers like Ayush practitioners are the ones who will go to Court asking for "equal pay" as MBBS doctors or go to Court complaining about "Wikipedia calling Ayurveda a pseudoscience". Bunch of clowns. Reject these quacks who swindle people by "role playing" doctors.
1:00

A 24 year old man dislocated his jaw after a "deep yawn" while on a train to Dibrugarh. He was treated and cured immediately by the Railway Hospital surgeon - a doctor trained in MBBS and specialised in MS ENT speciality. Now imagine if the only "doctor" in the train or nearby was an Ayurveda or Homeopathy 'specialist', could they have helped this patient? Absolutely not. Because they are not really doctors, and they are incompetent in helping patients. These incidents are what people with real medical training do on a daily basis. Only pseudoscience peddlers like Ayush practitioners are the ones who will go to Court asking for "equal pay" as MBBS doctors or go to Court complaining about "Wikipedia calling Ayurveda a pseudoscience". Bunch of clowns. Reject these quacks who swindle people by "role playing" doctors.

TheLiverDoc™

470,425 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Superpower co-founder Max Marchione describes how he went from being a peptide skeptic to a peptide believer: "When I was first introduced to peptides, one of the most esteemed doctors in the US said to me: 'You take so many supplements. Have you explored peptides? Because I think they're a really interesting modality with a few decades of clinical use.'" "When he said that to me, I was like, 'No way. This is BS. I'm not injecting myself with something. That's weird.'" "So what I did is, I went around to around 20 different doctors whose opinions I respect, and I asked them about peptides. Normally when you ask these doctors about anything — you ask about red meat, spinach, [etc.] — they're all divided." "With peptides, all of them except one said 'These are really interesting. I have used these in my patients. I believe endogenous molecules — peptides that exist in our body — are going to be the future of medicine.'" "And those doctors have the incentive not to be wrong. If they're wrong, they could go to jail. If they're wrong, they can have their license stripped. If they're wrong, patients don't come back to them. They have the maximum incentive. And for 10 to 20 years, they still give [peptides] to their patients. And their patients say 'My life changed.'" "You might say it's placebo. My statement is that the patient says their life changes, and the doctor sees that."
1:21

Superpower co-founder Max Marchione describes how he went from being a peptide skeptic to a peptide believer: "When I was first introduced to peptides, one of the most esteemed doctors in the US said to me: 'You take so many supplements. Have you explored peptides? Because I think they're a really interesting modality with a few decades of clinical use.'" "When he said that to me, I was like, 'No way. This is BS. I'm not injecting myself with something. That's weird.'" "So what I did is, I went around to around 20 different doctors whose opinions I respect, and I asked them about peptides. Normally when you ask these doctors about anything — you ask about red meat, spinach, [etc.] — they're all divided." "With peptides, all of them except one said 'These are really interesting. I have used these in my patients. I believe endogenous molecules — peptides that exist in our body — are going to be the future of medicine.'" "And those doctors have the incentive not to be wrong. If they're wrong, they could go to jail. If they're wrong, they can have their license stripped. If they're wrong, patients don't come back to them. They have the maximum incentive. And for 10 to 20 years, they still give [peptides] to their patients. And their patients say 'My life changed.'" "You might say it's placebo. My statement is that the patient says their life changes, and the doctor sees that."

TBPN

37,426 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

In an exclusive interaction with DD News Jammu, the lady doctor from GMC Jammu who was physically assaulted by the attendants of a patient said, “I was on emergency duty yesterday. I got a call that a patient is unstable and not able to breathe...I removed the tube but still the patient was not able to breathe…during these medical procedures, the attendants of the patient were getting aggressive…I tried to make them understand about all medical procedures but they became aggressive…We do not deserve this treatment because we give our hundred percent”. Manoj Sinha Syed Abid Rasheed Shah Sakina Itoo Omar Abdullah
3:05

In an exclusive interaction with DD News Jammu, the lady doctor from GMC Jammu who was physically assaulted by the attendants of a patient said, “I was on emergency duty yesterday. I got a call that a patient is unstable and not able to breathe...I removed the tube but still the patient was not able to breathe…during these medical procedures, the attendants of the patient were getting aggressive…I tried to make them understand about all medical procedures but they became aggressive…We do not deserve this treatment because we give our hundred percent”. Manoj Sinha Syed Abid Rasheed Shah Sakina Itoo Omar Abdullah

DD NEWS JAMMU | डीडी न्यूज़ जम्मू

18,584 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Accessing your own medical records should be straightforward, not a struggle. Doctors waste time wrestling with PDFs, dictaphones and fax machines instead of looking after patients. Digitising the NHS and giving patients control of their records will change that.
1:10

Accessing your own medical records should be straightforward, not a struggle. Doctors waste time wrestling with PDFs, dictaphones and fax machines instead of looking after patients. Digitising the NHS and giving patients control of their records will change that.

Dr Peter Prinsley MP

14,137 просмотров • 1 год назад

The Elective Care Reform Plan will allow millions of patients to receive quicker diagnosis and treatment for routine care. This ambitious blueprint will empower patients and put them in control of their own care. Click on the link to find out more. ➡️
1:32

The Elective Care Reform Plan will allow millions of patients to receive quicker diagnosis and treatment for routine care. This ambitious blueprint will empower patients and put them in control of their own care. Click on the link to find out more. ➡️

NHS England

81,414 просмотров • 1 год назад

"I saw six patients relapse with melanoma in six weeks." Testifying before the Senate today, oncologist Prof. Angus Dalgleish described seeing melanoma patients who had been stable for years relapse in a short period of time. "They'd been stable for 3 to 18 years, and the thing that was common is they'd all received a booster vaccine." Dalgleish also said he was hearing reports from fellow surgeons of colorectal cancers "presenting late stage 4, not stage 1 or 2," and appearing "in patients in their 20s, 30s and 40s in a way that we have not seen before." Discussing his review of the scientific literature, Dalgleish said it shows "at least a dozen mechanisms where messenger RNA can insert into the DNA and activate oncogenes." "As an oncologist who I'm starting to see that it's not only my patients now, it's people I know really, well, who are going down with cancer and they're going down more aggressively, and the treatment is not working nearly as well." "Many have seen a dozen doctors before. Not one of them has ever asked the vaccine history." "So of course they see no evidence."
2:54

"I saw six patients relapse with melanoma in six weeks." Testifying before the Senate today, oncologist Prof. Angus Dalgleish described seeing melanoma patients who had been stable for years relapse in a short period of time. "They'd been stable for 3 to 18 years, and the thing that was common is they'd all received a booster vaccine." Dalgleish also said he was hearing reports from fellow surgeons of colorectal cancers "presenting late stage 4, not stage 1 or 2," and appearing "in patients in their 20s, 30s and 40s in a way that we have not seen before." Discussing his review of the scientific literature, Dalgleish said it shows "at least a dozen mechanisms where messenger RNA can insert into the DNA and activate oncogenes." "As an oncologist who I'm starting to see that it's not only my patients now, it's people I know really, well, who are going down with cancer and they're going down more aggressively, and the treatment is not working nearly as well." "Many have seen a dozen doctors before. Not one of them has ever asked the vaccine history." "So of course they see no evidence."

Children’s Health Defense

84,157 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Dr. Caleb Masterson say health insurance companies are openly breaking laws in Alabama He explains some of his patients situations with insurance companies - “I had an insurance company tell a patient that no authorization for the procedure was required, the procedure was performed, and then the patient was denied the care because the procedure was never authorized. So the patient got charged the entire cost of the procedure” - “I had another patient who is supposed to be due an answer to an insurance claim within 30 days of submission. If they do not reply within 30 days, that's breaking Alabama law. And that claim is currently at the 65th day, so its insurance can be breaking the law.” - “Then I had an insurance company deny care to a patient that they had previously approved. So a patient qualified for surgery based on medical necessity, they had met all the criteria for surgery, they underwent surgery, then the patient had that surgery denied. The patient submitted that information to the insurance company and said, Hey, look, this was already pre-approved. And they said, We reversed our decision and the patient had to pay.”
1:06

Dr. Caleb Masterson say health insurance companies are openly breaking laws in Alabama He explains some of his patients situations with insurance companies - “I had an insurance company tell a patient that no authorization for the procedure was required, the procedure was performed, and then the patient was denied the care because the procedure was never authorized. So the patient got charged the entire cost of the procedure” - “I had another patient who is supposed to be due an answer to an insurance claim within 30 days of submission. If they do not reply within 30 days, that's breaking Alabama law. And that claim is currently at the 65th day, so its insurance can be breaking the law.” - “Then I had an insurance company deny care to a patient that they had previously approved. So a patient qualified for surgery based on medical necessity, they had met all the criteria for surgery, they underwent surgery, then the patient had that surgery denied. The patient submitted that information to the insurance company and said, Hey, look, this was already pre-approved. And they said, We reversed our decision and the patient had to pay.”

Wall Street Apes

46,070 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

This is Mel Thacker. She was an American surgeon, she quit After going through medical school and being a successful surgeon. She left the profession because of what US Heath Insurance Companies have done to healthcare “So I recently left my career as a surgeon, and I wanted to share that the primary reason I did that is because of moral injury — I felt powerless. I wanted to prescribe a very cheap medication to my patients, like Budesonide, and their insurance company would deny it, and the pharmacy would tell them it would cost them $300. And I couldn't tell which patients had the insurance that would do that and which ones didn't. That's just one tiny little example. But multiply that by thousands and thousands of encounters of interactions, of trying to either prescribe a medication or prescribe a treatment plan or do a surgery, and to just be met with roadblocks and layers of bureaucracy that are, quote, unquote, meant to keep healthcare costs down or a patient safe. But really, don't they just drive a wedge, multiple, multiple wedges between the physician and the patient And when we keep layering in these roadblocks, preventing the doctor and the patient from having an actual relationship, that's when we make mistakes. And so how do we fix this? We got to get business out of medicine. Healthcare needs to go back to relationship building, to trust. Trust between the physician and the patient. They need to be put on the pedestal. We need to start there. Not with the shareholders, not with all of the bureaucratic tasks that are meant to keep patients safe, but just increase costs.”
2:02

This is Mel Thacker. She was an American surgeon, she quit After going through medical school and being a successful surgeon. She left the profession because of what US Heath Insurance Companies have done to healthcare “So I recently left my career as a surgeon, and I wanted to share that the primary reason I did that is because of moral injury — I felt powerless. I wanted to prescribe a very cheap medication to my patients, like Budesonide, and their insurance company would deny it, and the pharmacy would tell them it would cost them $300. And I couldn't tell which patients had the insurance that would do that and which ones didn't. That's just one tiny little example. But multiply that by thousands and thousands of encounters of interactions, of trying to either prescribe a medication or prescribe a treatment plan or do a surgery, and to just be met with roadblocks and layers of bureaucracy that are, quote, unquote, meant to keep healthcare costs down or a patient safe. But really, don't they just drive a wedge, multiple, multiple wedges between the physician and the patient And when we keep layering in these roadblocks, preventing the doctor and the patient from having an actual relationship, that's when we make mistakes. And so how do we fix this? We got to get business out of medicine. Healthcare needs to go back to relationship building, to trust. Trust between the physician and the patient. They need to be put on the pedestal. We need to start there. Not with the shareholders, not with all of the bureaucratic tasks that are meant to keep patients safe, but just increase costs.”

Wall Street Apes

2,292,657 просмотров • 1 год назад

RFK Jr.: "Doctors are being paid to vaccinate, not to evaluate. They're pressured to follow the money, not the science. We've recently uncovered that more than 36,000 doctors had their Medicare reimbursements altered based upon childhood vaccination rates." "That's not medicine. That's coercion. It's immoral. It has no place in a constitutional democracy or in a system that claims to protect children. Medical decisions should be made based upon one thing and one thing only, the well-being of the patient, never on a financial bonus or a government mandate. Patients deserve honest, uncorrupted advice from their doctors." "Doctors deserve the freedom to use their training and to follow the science and speak the truth without fear of punishment. Doctors should be guided by medical judgment and their Hippocratic oath, not by financial incentives or government mandates."
0:58

RFK Jr.: "Doctors are being paid to vaccinate, not to evaluate. They're pressured to follow the money, not the science. We've recently uncovered that more than 36,000 doctors had their Medicare reimbursements altered based upon childhood vaccination rates." "That's not medicine. That's coercion. It's immoral. It has no place in a constitutional democracy or in a system that claims to protect children. Medical decisions should be made based upon one thing and one thing only, the well-being of the patient, never on a financial bonus or a government mandate. Patients deserve honest, uncorrupted advice from their doctors." "Doctors deserve the freedom to use their training and to follow the science and speak the truth without fear of punishment. Doctors should be guided by medical judgment and their Hippocratic oath, not by financial incentives or government mandates."

Camus

314,253 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Should you trust alternative medicine practitioners? The answer is a resounding NO. And here is an example. Trivandrum, Kerala-based Ayurveda practitioner Vaidya (not Dr.) Rekha Radhamony misleads her >100K followers on Instagram with an extremely dangerous anti-science narrative. Such narratives sow seeds of mistrust in science-based medicine among patients and general population. It generates chemophobia (that all modern medicines are chemicals), inculcating the false notion that everything "natural and herbal" are safer and primal practices are effective. This helps Ayurveds and such practitioners sell their practices and products to people. AYUSH practititioners deceive themselves first, through a study course that stuns their critical thinking centers and makes them sheeple when it comes to following dogmatic practices on healthcare. They stop questioning. They stop thinking logically. They lose rationality. They become pithed frogs on a tray waiting for controlled animation. Ayurveda/Homeopathy are like a religion. The practitioners become members of a cult. Their only aim is to protect the religious/dogmatic principles and practices of the cult and its members and have zero concerns and are insensitive towards patients and their families. This results in FIVE major issues: 1. Patients get misdiagnosed and disease worsen. 2. Patients receive wrong treatments for correct diagnoses and develop disease-related complications. 3. Patients develop severe complications related to toxicity and adverse events of untested, unregulated alternative medicines. 4. Patients end up spending more for their required timely treatments due to initial mistreatment and falsely believe that modern medicine is expensive. 5. Patients die - terribly - avoidable deaths. Practices such as Ayurveda are deeply flawed - from every perspective you look at it. The practitioners are empty vessels, they make background noise, they cannot diagnose, treat, and do not have a protocol for follow-up and has no knowledge, practice or methods to identify adverse effects within their treatments. Homeopathy is even worse - if a patient develops worsening of disease due to diluted treatments, or a side effect of the treatment, they consider it "Homeopathic aggravation" - where they are taught and believe that eveyrthing good happens after a period of worsening. Even if the patient dies, Homeopaths would not be able to understand that the person is dead, because Homeopathic practice is inherently a brain-dead practice. Practices such as Ayurveda escape the scientific method and shy away from realistic testing and rigorous trials - because they sure-shot fail. When the evidence is lacking, then how can they sell? In this video, "the primal and primitive dogmatism of healthcare" indoctrinated Vaidya Rekha does exactly that. She confirms that Ayurvedic practice is garbage-worthy & cowardly and sticks to 5000 year old nauseating and utterly nonsense principles that refuse change and runs away from scrutiny. Following such practices is extremely harmful and this WILL lead to avoidable loss of life. The biggest strength of science-based medicine and medical science is that it is humble in its principles. Every new and effective finding is embraced and old findings are discarded. Every wrong is made right, in due course. Every wrong is identified - there is a strong machinery in place. Every doctor will appreciate the flaws and change for the better. It is nowhere like the stupid alternative medicine which is adamant and anti-human and anti-health. Scientific medicine does not fear change, does not fear acceptance of mistakes and does not invest and emote with the past. Everything is futuritic and everything is for the people. Make NO mistake. Ayush practices are cultish, and for the deceptive livelihood of the person practicing. Scientific practices are humanistic, and not for a person, but for the people.
0:41

Should you trust alternative medicine practitioners? The answer is a resounding NO. And here is an example. Trivandrum, Kerala-based Ayurveda practitioner Vaidya (not Dr.) Rekha Radhamony misleads her >100K followers on Instagram with an extremely dangerous anti-science narrative. Such narratives sow seeds of mistrust in science-based medicine among patients and general population. It generates chemophobia (that all modern medicines are chemicals), inculcating the false notion that everything "natural and herbal" are safer and primal practices are effective. This helps Ayurveds and such practitioners sell their practices and products to people. AYUSH practititioners deceive themselves first, through a study course that stuns their critical thinking centers and makes them sheeple when it comes to following dogmatic practices on healthcare. They stop questioning. They stop thinking logically. They lose rationality. They become pithed frogs on a tray waiting for controlled animation. Ayurveda/Homeopathy are like a religion. The practitioners become members of a cult. Their only aim is to protect the religious/dogmatic principles and practices of the cult and its members and have zero concerns and are insensitive towards patients and their families. This results in FIVE major issues: 1. Patients get misdiagnosed and disease worsen. 2. Patients receive wrong treatments for correct diagnoses and develop disease-related complications. 3. Patients develop severe complications related to toxicity and adverse events of untested, unregulated alternative medicines. 4. Patients end up spending more for their required timely treatments due to initial mistreatment and falsely believe that modern medicine is expensive. 5. Patients die - terribly - avoidable deaths. Practices such as Ayurveda are deeply flawed - from every perspective you look at it. The practitioners are empty vessels, they make background noise, they cannot diagnose, treat, and do not have a protocol for follow-up and has no knowledge, practice or methods to identify adverse effects within their treatments. Homeopathy is even worse - if a patient develops worsening of disease due to diluted treatments, or a side effect of the treatment, they consider it "Homeopathic aggravation" - where they are taught and believe that eveyrthing good happens after a period of worsening. Even if the patient dies, Homeopaths would not be able to understand that the person is dead, because Homeopathic practice is inherently a brain-dead practice. Practices such as Ayurveda escape the scientific method and shy away from realistic testing and rigorous trials - because they sure-shot fail. When the evidence is lacking, then how can they sell? In this video, "the primal and primitive dogmatism of healthcare" indoctrinated Vaidya Rekha does exactly that. She confirms that Ayurvedic practice is garbage-worthy & cowardly and sticks to 5000 year old nauseating and utterly nonsense principles that refuse change and runs away from scrutiny. Following such practices is extremely harmful and this WILL lead to avoidable loss of life. The biggest strength of science-based medicine and medical science is that it is humble in its principles. Every new and effective finding is embraced and old findings are discarded. Every wrong is made right, in due course. Every wrong is identified - there is a strong machinery in place. Every doctor will appreciate the flaws and change for the better. It is nowhere like the stupid alternative medicine which is adamant and anti-human and anti-health. Scientific medicine does not fear change, does not fear acceptance of mistakes and does not invest and emote with the past. Everything is futuritic and everything is for the people. Make NO mistake. Ayush practices are cultish, and for the deceptive livelihood of the person practicing. Scientific practices are humanistic, and not for a person, but for the people.

TheLiverDoc™

152,356 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🇵🇸 🇯🇴 His Majesty King Abdullah II: “The world is watching, and history will judge us by the courage we show. And it’s not just the future that will hold us accountable, so will the people of the here and now. They will judge whether we, as the United Nations, will surrender to inaction, or will fight to uphold the principles that anchor this institution and our world. Right now, they are asking whether we will stand by as parents watch their children waste away, as doctors watch their patients die for lack of basic medical supplies, and as more innocent lives are lost, because the world failed to act. This war must end. Hostages and detainees must return home. But every day we wait is one day too long for far too many.”
1:21

🇵🇸 🇯🇴 His Majesty King Abdullah II: “The world is watching, and history will judge us by the courage we show. And it’s not just the future that will hold us accountable, so will the people of the here and now. They will judge whether we, as the United Nations, will surrender to inaction, or will fight to uphold the principles that anchor this institution and our world. Right now, they are asking whether we will stand by as parents watch their children waste away, as doctors watch their patients die for lack of basic medical supplies, and as more innocent lives are lost, because the world failed to act. This war must end. Hostages and detainees must return home. But every day we wait is one day too long for far too many.”

State of Palestine

419,769 просмотров • 1 год назад