正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Another devastating and profound moment from Douthat’s Interesting Times:

436,296 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

36 条评论

Moog Rogue 的头像
Moog Rogue2 个月前

“What do you mean?” perfectly captured both her limits of imagination and her soullessness.

Burna47592 的头像
Burna475922 个月前

The most soulless “what do you mean” I’ve ever heard

Sebas天 的头像
Sebas天2 个月前

it sounds like he's trying to bring the Spenglerian argument that: “When the ordinary thought of a highly cultivated people begins to regard 'having children' as a question of pro's and con's, the great turning-point has come.”

Wolf.Guy 的头像
Wolf.Guy2 个月前

It seems profound but really its emotive slop. There's no substance behind this other than a vague Burkean conception that "this is how procreation is therefore thats how it should be." Vibes aren't a substantial argument.

keenye 的头像
keenye2 个月前

I think of this exchange like once a week lol

colin 的头像
colin2 个月前

The meaning attributed to the scene is created by the author’s mind, not inherent in the method of birthing a child.

DOWE 的头像
DOWE2 个月前

He’s so good. We are lucky to have him

Mechanical Mind 的头像
Mechanical Mind2 个月前

Doesn't seem to me that parents would be losing something poem-worthy if they have a child by IVF. Surely the existence and behavior of the child are the relevant parts. The child would still be there in the bed anyway.

Gun Emoji Evolution 的头像
Gun Emoji Evolution2 个月前

The poem’s world the destruction of which Ross is pre-lamenting is itself a sterile technological construct, in the good old days there would have been no child’s footsteps in the hall cuz the whole family would’ve been sleeping together on the floor of the one room mud hut

Dmitriy Mandel aka Schnitzel 🐈 的头像
Dmitriy Mandel aka Schnitzel 🐈2 个月前

"What do you mean?" "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it"

frc 的头像
frc2 个月前

Man i love this guy

G. Sheppard 的头像
G. Sheppard2 个月前

Here's the video: Interesting Times with Ross Douthat. 8/7/2025. "Silicon Valley Wants to Optimize Your Children's Genes." Featuring Noor Siddiqui, CEO & founder of Orchid Health. .

Clive Davidson 的头像
Clive Davidson2 个月前

@pegobry_en She is the embodiment of the film Gattaca, where society looks down on and derides “love children” in favour of genetically selected offspring.

Workhouse Overseer 🌐🥑🍌 的头像
Workhouse Overseer 🌐🥑🍌2 个月前

There's millions of people born of IVF alive today and I imagine their parents love them just as much as any other parents love their children

Fedesco 的头像
Fedesco2 个月前

Where's her response though?

DoctorBrydon 的头像
DoctorBrydon2 个月前

Look in her eyes. She has no fucking understanding of what he's talking about.

🥥🌴 的头像
🥥🌴2 个月前

Pretty weak tbh

Daniel Wortel-London 的头像
Daniel Wortel-London2 个月前

We have more power at our disposal today than we have ever had, and yet we are more alienated and estranged from the inner ground of meaning and of love than we have ever been. - Thomas Merton

Sebastian Mellen 的头像
Sebastian Mellen2 个月前

................."what do you mean".............-_-?

Mountain Marmee 的头像
Mountain Marmee2 个月前

In case anyone’s wondering: her answer to this (and to all questions about ethics throughout the interview) was a complete dodge. It is only worth hearing to confirm the fact that she sees the moral & societal ramifications of her technology to be beneath consideration.

AntifaAlgaeScientist 的头像
AntifaAlgaeScientist2 个月前

Yeah let’s deny families choice by stopping a technological advancement because it’s more romantic to have a baby through regular boning. Whatever man.

james 的头像
james2 个月前

@pegobry_en her insane smile while he speaks is just crazy… get this woman away from any power and influence

Amy Mantravadi 的头像
Amy Mantravadi2 个月前

Ah, yes. Orchid. The people who let you avoid having a special needs child, supposedly. Which is another way to say, eradicate all special needs people on the front end.

Aaron Stannard 的头像
Aaron Stannard2 个月前

one of the few remaining taboos in Silicon Valley is asking actually profound questions - only performative ones are sanctioned

Kaushal Kashyap Ⓥ 的头像
Kaushal Kashyap Ⓥ2 个月前

What was her response? We ned to stop thinking in binary terms. Both can be the option for parents. Its their choice.

Caleb Hughes 的头像
Caleb Hughes2 个月前

It was a devastating moment from the perspective of people who agree with Ross, but as Matthew Anderson wrote (and persuaded me of!), probably not a moment that had a chance of persuading her

Caleb Wait 的头像
Caleb Wait2 个月前

As if often the case, Matt is more prescient and understanding and knowledgeable about this. And from my replies, his point only stands.

EmberDays 的头像
EmberDays2 个月前

Her uncomfortable grin says it all. What fkn weirdo.

Cardinal 的头像
Cardinal2 个月前

If people genuinely value natural conception enough they'll opt for that instead of IVF; the way to find out what people really value more is to let them choose.

tater tot 的头像
tater tot2 个月前

Noor is the greatest and you guys will never be on her level in any way whatsoever

JAW 的头像
JAW2 个月前

moral autism of "what do you mean?"

Craig Willy 的头像
Craig Willy2 个月前

It was interesting. What was devastating and profound in your view?

Nolan Pine 的头像
Nolan Pine2 个月前

How did she respond?

Kenneth Kitchin 的头像
Kenneth Kitchin2 个月前

These people have gotten so rich of Silicon Valley money that they’ve lost all sight of what it means to be a human

Amy 的头像
Amy2 个月前

The vacuous, vapid grin says it all.

Alex Hunt 🏹 的头像
Alex Hunt 🏹2 个月前

I forgot how funny this moment was lol

相关视频