正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Another Diddy documentary? This time his sons Justin & Christian Combs are breaking their silence about their father's arrest in a new docuseries on Zeus Zeus CEO Lemuel Plummer responded to backlash after dropping the 2026 trailer "To be clear, this documentary series is centered on providing Justin and... Christian the opportunity to share their personal story and lived experiences, particularly as their lives have also been directly impacted. This project is not intended to endorse, defend, or vindicate Diddy or any individual, nor does it seek to justify or minimize any actions that have been alleged or adjudicated. As a network, we believe in the importance of allowing individuals to speak for themselves, just as any credible network entering the documentary space does. Our role is to provide a platform for stories to be told honestly and without pre-judgment. What viewers will see is raw, real, and authentic storytelling. That is the essence of this project. We respectfully ask that the series not be prejudged before it is seen. Everyone will have the opportunity to watch, assess the content, and arrive at their own conclusions."show more

Victor Baez | Club Ambition

47,708 subscribers

84,598 次观看 • 9 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

“This project is not intended to endorse, defend, or vindicate Diddy or any individual, nor does it seek to justify or minimize any actions that have been alleged or adjudicated.” - Zeus CEO, Lemuel Plummer, addresses the upcoming docuseries with Justin & Christian Combs

“This project is not intended to endorse, defend, or vindicate Diddy or any individual, nor does it seek to justify or minimize any actions that have been alleged or adjudicated.” - Zeus CEO, Lemuel Plummer, addresses the upcoming docuseries with Justin & Christian Combs

Block Topickz (formerly Glock Topickz)

20,752 次观看 • 9 个月前

Speculation that the Holiday Inn Express hotel in Rhoose will be used to house Afghans is deeply concerning. I've been contacted by several constituents about this, who are understandably and legitimately concerned. There have also been several reports on social media. As an elected member representing the area, authorities have told me nothing about this. To the best of my knowledge, there has been no public statement issued by the Ministry of Defence. This is unacceptable. Speculation has been ongoing for several days, and an information vacuum has inevitably developed. I therefore wanted to take the opportunity to explain the actions I have undertaken to address this. I have written to the MOD asking them to clarify the situation urgently. To clarify my position, if speculation is correct, I would strongly and categorically oppose the hotel being used for suggested purpose. It is not suitable to provide accomodation of this nature. The hotel was built to provide accomodation for airport passengers. As a result, the vast majority of guests would, in practice, stay at the hotel for a maximum of one night, either before or after their flight. As such, they would not access local NHS services, schools or other public services. This would not be the case if the hotel is used in the manner suggested. By contrast, it would put huge pressure on local amenities and other public services. It is also situated close to a new college that is set to open. If the reports are true, then the plans would have been developed without any consultation with residents. This too would be unacceptable. They should be afforded the opportunity to provide feedback, have their say and raise any concerns they may have. When I receive further updates, I will update residents accordingly. Be assured I will always put the local community first.

Speculation that the Holiday Inn Express hotel in Rhoose will be used to house Afghans is deeply concerning. I've been contacted by several constituents about this, who are understandably and legitimately concerned. There have also been several reports on social media. As an elected member representing the area, authorities have told me nothing about this. To the best of my knowledge, there has been no public statement issued by the Ministry of Defence. This is unacceptable. Speculation has been ongoing for several days, and an information vacuum has inevitably developed. I therefore wanted to take the opportunity to explain the actions I have undertaken to address this. I have written to the MOD asking them to clarify the situation urgently. To clarify my position, if speculation is correct, I would strongly and categorically oppose the hotel being used for suggested purpose. It is not suitable to provide accomodation of this nature. The hotel was built to provide accomodation for airport passengers. As a result, the vast majority of guests would, in practice, stay at the hotel for a maximum of one night, either before or after their flight. As such, they would not access local NHS services, schools or other public services. This would not be the case if the hotel is used in the manner suggested. By contrast, it would put huge pressure on local amenities and other public services. It is also situated close to a new college that is set to open. If the reports are true, then the plans would have been developed without any consultation with residents. This too would be unacceptable. They should be afforded the opportunity to provide feedback, have their say and raise any concerns they may have. When I receive further updates, I will update residents accordingly. Be assured I will always put the local community first.

Andrew RT Davies

13,694 次观看 • 1 年前

No person forfeits their right to life, dignity or their status as a human being because they are alleged to have violated a law. This is a defining feature of our Constitution that sets us apart as a nation of due process and the rule of law. We will not tolerate anyone using allegations related to any person’s nationality or immigration status to violate their inherent human dignity and our Constitution, or to inflict damage on our society. It simply cannot and will not stand.

No person forfeits their right to life, dignity or their status as a human being because they are alleged to have violated a law. This is a defining feature of our Constitution that sets us apart as a nation of due process and the rule of law. We will not tolerate anyone using allegations related to any person’s nationality or immigration status to violate their inherent human dignity and our Constitution, or to inflict damage on our society. It simply cannot and will not stand.

Leon Schreiber

270,146 次观看 • 3 个月前

After almost 3 years we have a good ending to the Montreal curfew and boat raid story! This is the documentary that Montreal police does not want you to see. Be sure to watch it!

After almost 3 years we have a good ending to the Montreal curfew and boat raid story! This is the documentary that Montreal police does not want you to see. Be sure to watch it!

Yanky 🇺🇲

112,870 次观看 • 2 年前

Germany’s Chancellor Merz: Why all of this? What is, so to speak, the overarching idea? What is the story behind it? What is the purpose of these reforms? Well, ladies and gentlemen, perhaps that is the answer we have failed to provide more than any other. I do not exclude myself from that criticism. We will have to provide an answer — especially to the younger generation in Germany. We have to give the younger generation a convincing answer as to what our country stands for and where our society is supposed to be heading.

Germany’s Chancellor Merz: Why all of this? What is, so to speak, the overarching idea? What is the story behind it? What is the purpose of these reforms? Well, ladies and gentlemen, perhaps that is the answer we have failed to provide more than any other. I do not exclude myself from that criticism. We will have to provide an answer — especially to the younger generation in Germany. We have to give the younger generation a convincing answer as to what our country stands for and where our society is supposed to be heading.

Military Summary

14,639 次观看 • 23 天前

What did Q mean, “the end will not be for everyone?” How can it be? Is this fair? How could it be that the Great Awakening is not for everyone? I have been trying to understand this question for years. I have a possible answer. Q also writes: “Focus, Focus, Ascension.” In order to ascend, one must forget who he is, or who he and others around him consider him to be. This is called ego-death. As a collective, we will reinvent ourselves based on new information. This is not for everyone, and not everyone will be able to achieve this. To accept everything taught about history, healing, law, and life in general is a lie, requires great strength. To have to walk away from your religion is epic. The end will not be for everyone. We have to leave the matrix(all based on lies), and return to the promised land, where we have direct contact with creation itself, 24/7.

What did Q mean, “the end will not be for everyone?” How can it be? Is this fair? How could it be that the Great Awakening is not for everyone? I have been trying to understand this question for years. I have a possible answer. Q also writes: “Focus, Focus, Ascension.” In order to ascend, one must forget who he is, or who he and others around him consider him to be. This is called ego-death. As a collective, we will reinvent ourselves based on new information. This is not for everyone, and not everyone will be able to achieve this. To accept everything taught about history, healing, law, and life in general is a lie, requires great strength. To have to walk away from your religion is epic. The end will not be for everyone. We have to leave the matrix(all based on lies), and return to the promised land, where we have direct contact with creation itself, 24/7.

Eli Weber

77,605 次观看 • 1 个月前

Here's what Rob Bonta said this afternoon on MS NOW about the reports that Paramount is on the verge of saying it'll leave California: "I can't comment on what a corporation will do. And this is a corporation who has professed a commitment to L.A., to Hollywood, to staying there. So, we've heard this threat before, and it's inconsistent with other things that they have said. If they decide to leave, it's their independent choice. I'm not asking for it. I don't want it, obviously. And that responsibility will lay at their feet. There's nothing about this case that requires that – or would cause it. It would be their choice and their choice alone. They'll have to own it. You know, we will enforce the law always without fear or favor. That's our job. And we will also be willing, always, to come to the table and have good faith, sincere negotiations to solve the problem before us. But we're not focused on their threats. We're focused on this case, which is protecting everyday people in California, making sure their costs are affordable, their costs for cable or satellite, for going to the movies. That's what antitrust is about. It's about affordability. So we want to keep prices fair, make sure we protect jobs. And this merger is a threat to jobs. There will be 5000 to 10,000 jobs that could be lost, billions of dollars in economic activity lost because of the merger. We want to make sure there's choice, quality, competition. That's what antitrust enforcement is all about. So we're going to focus on the job ahead, be firm, be fair, and not be distracted by threats."

Here's what Rob Bonta said this afternoon on MS NOW about the reports that Paramount is on the verge of saying it'll leave California: "I can't comment on what a corporation will do. And this is a corporation who has professed a commitment to L.A., to Hollywood, to staying there. So, we've heard this threat before, and it's inconsistent with other things that they have said. If they decide to leave, it's their independent choice. I'm not asking for it. I don't want it, obviously. And that responsibility will lay at their feet. There's nothing about this case that requires that – or would cause it. It would be their choice and their choice alone. They'll have to own it. You know, we will enforce the law always without fear or favor. That's our job. And we will also be willing, always, to come to the table and have good faith, sincere negotiations to solve the problem before us. But we're not focused on their threats. We're focused on this case, which is protecting everyday people in California, making sure their costs are affordable, their costs for cable or satellite, for going to the movies. That's what antitrust is about. It's about affordability. So we want to keep prices fair, make sure we protect jobs. And this merger is a threat to jobs. There will be 5000 to 10,000 jobs that could be lost, billions of dollars in economic activity lost because of the merger. We want to make sure there's choice, quality, competition. That's what antitrust enforcement is all about. So we're going to focus on the job ahead, be firm, be fair, and not be distracted by threats."

Brian Stelter

1,744,159 次观看 • 15 天前

'This is not for a war with Russia' – Macron stated that 26 countries have agreed to send their troops to Ukraine. 'These troops will be a force for ensuring security on land, at sea, or in the air. They will provide Ukraine with guarantees on the day after a ceasefire or peace agreement. This force has no intention or goal to wage any war against Russia. These are forces meant to guarantee peace and, strategically, to be a clear and significant factor. Their deployment will occur under ceasefire conditions, not on the front line, but in areas currently being determined. But the purpose of these forces is to prevent any new large-scale aggression and to involve 26 states directly in ensuring the security and restoration of Ukraine. We have agreed to begin political and legal work to formalize these security guarantees — together with Ukraine and coalition countries.' - SK

'This is not for a war with Russia' – Macron stated that 26 countries have agreed to send their troops to Ukraine. 'These troops will be a force for ensuring security on land, at sea, or in the air. They will provide Ukraine with guarantees on the day after a ceasefire or peace agreement. This force has no intention or goal to wage any war against Russia. These are forces meant to guarantee peace and, strategically, to be a clear and significant factor. Their deployment will occur under ceasefire conditions, not on the front line, but in areas currently being determined. But the purpose of these forces is to prevent any new large-scale aggression and to involve 26 states directly in ensuring the security and restoration of Ukraine. We have agreed to begin political and legal work to formalize these security guarantees — together with Ukraine and coalition countries.' - SK

Zlatti71

239,885 次观看 • 1 年前

60 years ago, Ronald Reagan gave Americans a warning that has stood the test of time. This is from Reagan's "Time for Choosing" speech: "If we lose freedom here, there is no place to escape to. This is the last stand on Earth. And this idea that government is beholden to the people, that it has no other source of power except to sovereign people, is still the newest and most unique idea in all the long history of man's relation to man. This is the issue of this election. Whether we believe in our capacity for self-government or whether we abandon the American revolution and confess that a little intellectual elite in a far-distant capital can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves." "You and I are told increasingly that we have to choose between a left or right, but I would like to suggest that there is no such thing as a left or right. There is only an up or down--up to a man's age-old dream, the ultimate in individual freedom consistent with law and order--or down to the ant heap totalitarianism, and regardless of their sincerity, their humanitarian motives, those who would trade our freedom for security have embarked on this downward course." ... "Well, I for one resent it when a representative of the people refers to you and me--the free man and woman of this country--as 'the masses.' This is a term we haven't applied to ourselves in America. But beyond that, 'the full power of centralized government'--this was the very thing the Founding Fathers sought to minimize. They knew that governments don't control things. A government can't control the economy without controlling people. And they know when a government sets out to do that, it must use force and coercion to achieve its purpose. They also knew, those Founding Fathers, that outside of its legitimate functions, government does nothing as well or as economically as the private sector of the economy." ... "They say we are always 'against' things, never 'for' anything. Well, the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but that they know so much that isn't so." ... "Mr. Democrat himself, Al Smith, the great American, came before the American people and charged that the leadership of his party was taking the part of Jefferson, Jackson, and Cleveland down the road under the banners of Marx, Lenin, and Stalin." ... "Our natural, inalienable rights are now considered to be a dispensation of government, and freedom has never been so fragile, so close to slipping from our grasp as it is at this moment." ... "You and I know and do not believe that life is so dear and peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery. If nothing in life is worth dying for, when did this begin--just in the face of this enemy? Or should Moses have told the children of Israel to live in slavery under the pharaohs? Should Christ have refused the cross? Should the patriots at Concord Bridge have thrown down their guns and refused to fire the shot heard 'round the world? The martyrs of history were not fools, and our honored dead who gave their lives to stop the advance of the Nazis didn't die in vain. Where, then, is the road to peace? Well, it's a simple answer after all." "You and I have the courage to say to our enemies, 'There is a price we will not pay.' There is a point beyond which they must not advance." ... "You and I have a rendezvous with destiny. We will preserve for our children this, the last best hope of man on Earth, or we will sentence them to take the last step into a thousand years of darkness." Doesn't it feel like Reagan is speaking to us TODAY?

60 years ago, Ronald Reagan gave Americans a warning that has stood the test of time. This is from Reagan's "Time for Choosing" speech: "If we lose freedom here, there is no place to escape to. This is the last stand on Earth. And this idea that government is beholden to the people, that it has no other source of power except to sovereign people, is still the newest and most unique idea in all the long history of man's relation to man. This is the issue of this election. Whether we believe in our capacity for self-government or whether we abandon the American revolution and confess that a little intellectual elite in a far-distant capital can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves." "You and I are told increasingly that we have to choose between a left or right, but I would like to suggest that there is no such thing as a left or right. There is only an up or down--up to a man's age-old dream, the ultimate in individual freedom consistent with law and order--or down to the ant heap totalitarianism, and regardless of their sincerity, their humanitarian motives, those who would trade our freedom for security have embarked on this downward course." ... "Well, I for one resent it when a representative of the people refers to you and me--the free man and woman of this country--as 'the masses.' This is a term we haven't applied to ourselves in America. But beyond that, 'the full power of centralized government'--this was the very thing the Founding Fathers sought to minimize. They knew that governments don't control things. A government can't control the economy without controlling people. And they know when a government sets out to do that, it must use force and coercion to achieve its purpose. They also knew, those Founding Fathers, that outside of its legitimate functions, government does nothing as well or as economically as the private sector of the economy." ... "They say we are always 'against' things, never 'for' anything. Well, the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but that they know so much that isn't so." ... "Mr. Democrat himself, Al Smith, the great American, came before the American people and charged that the leadership of his party was taking the part of Jefferson, Jackson, and Cleveland down the road under the banners of Marx, Lenin, and Stalin." ... "Our natural, inalienable rights are now considered to be a dispensation of government, and freedom has never been so fragile, so close to slipping from our grasp as it is at this moment." ... "You and I know and do not believe that life is so dear and peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery. If nothing in life is worth dying for, when did this begin--just in the face of this enemy? Or should Moses have told the children of Israel to live in slavery under the pharaohs? Should Christ have refused the cross? Should the patriots at Concord Bridge have thrown down their guns and refused to fire the shot heard 'round the world? The martyrs of history were not fools, and our honored dead who gave their lives to stop the advance of the Nazis didn't die in vain. Where, then, is the road to peace? Well, it's a simple answer after all." "You and I have the courage to say to our enemies, 'There is a price we will not pay.' There is a point beyond which they must not advance." ... "You and I have a rendezvous with destiny. We will preserve for our children this, the last best hope of man on Earth, or we will sentence them to take the last step into a thousand years of darkness." Doesn't it feel like Reagan is speaking to us TODAY?

Kyle Becker

104,422 次观看 • 2 年前

This UK man is an absolute legend “I don't think in my country, believe me, every inch of this land is mine. My ancestors have lived here for over a thousand years. I don't believe in bending anything to newcomers. You've chosen to live in my country, you live by our ways. We have the right to intellectually criticize one another's faiths. As a Christian, I'm not intimidated by that. We've already gone through hundreds of years of doing this to ourselves. Christianity can stand up to it. Islam, by contrast, is pretty new to the world of getting criticized intellectually. It is absolutely right to criticize Muhammad, his conduct, his words, his right to criticize the Quran. And if you don't like that, go and live somewhere else. We will be better off without you in this country. I want a country that will destroy anyone who does not accept the terms that I offered. Any Islamist who tries to impose Sharia law, any Islamist who thinks that we're going to use violence because you criticized our Prophet or you criticized our book. I want a country that will destroy their lives. Take away their kids, chuck them in prison, stop them having jobs, move them out of the country. I do not want to tolerate any Muslim living in this country that does not accept the Christian heritage of this land and what comes with that. If you are willing to accept the Christian heritage of the nation, then there's a place for you. It's not just get rid of Muslims because they're Muslims. I don't give a sh*t about islamists. I think we need to ruin their lives. And anyone who even slightly hints at an islamist ideology should be dealt with mercilessly, ruthlessly. All right, are we clear about the term?”

This UK man is an absolute legend “I don't think in my country, believe me, every inch of this land is mine. My ancestors have lived here for over a thousand years. I don't believe in bending anything to newcomers. You've chosen to live in my country, you live by our ways. We have the right to intellectually criticize one another's faiths. As a Christian, I'm not intimidated by that. We've already gone through hundreds of years of doing this to ourselves. Christianity can stand up to it. Islam, by contrast, is pretty new to the world of getting criticized intellectually. It is absolutely right to criticize Muhammad, his conduct, his words, his right to criticize the Quran. And if you don't like that, go and live somewhere else. We will be better off without you in this country. I want a country that will destroy anyone who does not accept the terms that I offered. Any Islamist who tries to impose Sharia law, any Islamist who thinks that we're going to use violence because you criticized our Prophet or you criticized our book. I want a country that will destroy their lives. Take away their kids, chuck them in prison, stop them having jobs, move them out of the country. I do not want to tolerate any Muslim living in this country that does not accept the Christian heritage of this land and what comes with that. If you are willing to accept the Christian heritage of the nation, then there's a place for you. It's not just get rid of Muslims because they're Muslims. I don't give a sh*t about islamists. I think we need to ruin their lives. And anyone who even slightly hints at an islamist ideology should be dealt with mercilessly, ruthlessly. All right, are we clear about the term?”

Wall Street Apes

179,354 次观看 • 8 个月前

I'm concerned about the 7 million businesses on TikTok that make their living there. I want to make sure that they have an opportunity, using a law here in the U.S. called the Jobs Act to be able to invest beside me no matter what amount they want to put in. So they become shareholders in the platform. That's why we call it the people's bid in the first place. So we have millions of shareholders in this deal that are all involved in supporting it and making their living from it. Want to be part of this Go to No money or other consideration is being solicited, and if sent in response, will not be accepted; no offer to buy the securities can be accepted and no part of the purchase price can be received until the offering statement is qualified, and any such offer may be withdrawn or revoked, without obligation or commitment of any kind, at any time before notice of its acceptance given after the qualification date; a person's indication of interest involves no obligation or commitment of any kind.

I'm concerned about the 7 million businesses on TikTok that make their living there. I want to make sure that they have an opportunity, using a law here in the U.S. called the Jobs Act to be able to invest beside me no matter what amount they want to put in. So they become shareholders in the platform. That's why we call it the people's bid in the first place. So we have millions of shareholders in this deal that are all involved in supporting it and making their living from it. Want to be part of this Go to No money or other consideration is being solicited, and if sent in response, will not be accepted; no offer to buy the securities can be accepted and no part of the purchase price can be received until the offering statement is qualified, and any such offer may be withdrawn or revoked, without obligation or commitment of any kind, at any time before notice of its acceptance given after the qualification date; a person's indication of interest involves no obligation or commitment of any kind.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

75,106 次观看 • 1 年前

More GOP questions about Iran end goals. Here’s GOP Rep Pete Sessions to me tonight: “This administration is going to have to figure out: what is the goal here? Is the goal here to open back up the strait of hormuz, or is it where Israel's position would be? Or is it to do away with their desire to bomb people?…We should have a better understanding about what is left in an arsenal against not only the United States and our assets there, but also Israel and other friends that we have in the gulf. So this is an equation that they are going to have to put their heads together and make that determination.”

More GOP questions about Iran end goals. Here’s GOP Rep Pete Sessions to me tonight: “This administration is going to have to figure out: what is the goal here? Is the goal here to open back up the strait of hormuz, or is it where Israel's position would be? Or is it to do away with their desire to bomb people?…We should have a better understanding about what is left in an arsenal against not only the United States and our assets there, but also Israel and other friends that we have in the gulf. So this is an equation that they are going to have to put their heads together and make that determination.”

Jim Sciutto

17,230 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨 JUST IN: Secretary Rubio is calling on Iranians to overthrow their OWN regime, now that the US has the regime on their knees "We would LOVE to see this regime be replaced, and as the President said, he would LOVE for the people of Iran to use this an opportunity to RISE UP and remove these leaders." "The bottom line is, no matter who governs that country a year from now, they will NOT have these ballistic missiles and they will NOT have these drones to threaten us."

🚨 JUST IN: Secretary Rubio is calling on Iranians to overthrow their OWN regime, now that the US has the regime on their knees "We would LOVE to see this regime be replaced, and as the President said, he would LOVE for the people of Iran to use this an opportunity to RISE UP and remove these leaders." "The bottom line is, no matter who governs that country a year from now, they will NOT have these ballistic missiles and they will NOT have these drones to threaten us."

Nick Sortor

191,599 次观看 • 7 个月前

It Is the Police Who Will Decide Whether or Not Senator Fadahunsi’s Statement Was Illegal or Not - Morka It is not for any of us to be second-guessing what was said or not said; that is the job of the police. He has been invited to explain his comments, and we must wait for the police to do their jobs and properly put his statements in context. Felix Morka, National Publicity Secretary, APC

It Is the Police Who Will Decide Whether or Not Senator Fadahunsi’s Statement Was Illegal or Not - Morka It is not for any of us to be second-guessing what was said or not said; that is the job of the police. He has been invited to explain his comments, and we must wait for the police to do their jobs and properly put his statements in context. Felix Morka, National Publicity Secretary, APC

ARISE NEWS

46,294 次观看 • 1 个月前

STRAWMAN: THE NATURE OF THE CAGE John K. Webster Here is a deep dive documentary that took 18 months of research to complete this film. No stone is left unturned. By the end of this film you will be well informed of the legal fiction that has been used to manipulate our society. “A minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority; it is not even a minority then; but it is irresistible when it clogs by its whole weight. If the alternative is to keep all just men in prison, or give up war and slavery, the State will not hesitate which to choose. If a thousand men were not to pay their tax bills this year, that would not be a violent and bloody measure, as it would be to pay them, and enable the State to commit violence and shed innocent blood. This is, in fact, the definition of a peaceable revolution, if any such is possible.” – Henry David Thoreau, Civil Disobedience

STRAWMAN: THE NATURE OF THE CAGE John K. Webster Here is a deep dive documentary that took 18 months of research to complete this film. No stone is left unturned. By the end of this film you will be well informed of the legal fiction that has been used to manipulate our society. “A minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority; it is not even a minority then; but it is irresistible when it clogs by its whole weight. If the alternative is to keep all just men in prison, or give up war and slavery, the State will not hesitate which to choose. If a thousand men were not to pay their tax bills this year, that would not be a violent and bloody measure, as it would be to pay them, and enable the State to commit violence and shed innocent blood. This is, in fact, the definition of a peaceable revolution, if any such is possible.” – Henry David Thoreau, Civil Disobedience

Redpill Drifter

104,934 次观看 • 2 年前

Deputy Prime Minister of Canada Chrystia Freeland today commenting about the documentary. “There is a film that is due to be screened at Tiff today in Toronto about Russian soldiers at War. Ukrainian diplomats and the Ukrainian Canadian Community have expressed really grave concerns about that film and I do want to say I share those concerns. We have to be really clear that this is a war where there is no moral equivalency this is a war of Russian aggression this is a war where Russia is breaking international law and committing war crimes. There is very clearly good and evil in this war. Ukrainians are fighting for their sovereignty and for democracy around the world and we as a country have to be very, very clear that there can be no moral equivalency in our understanding of this conflict. It's not right for Canadian public money to be supporting the screening and production of a film like this.”

Deputy Prime Minister of Canada Chrystia Freeland today commenting about the documentary. “There is a film that is due to be screened at Tiff today in Toronto about Russian soldiers at War. Ukrainian diplomats and the Ukrainian Canadian Community have expressed really grave concerns about that film and I do want to say I share those concerns. We have to be really clear that this is a war where there is no moral equivalency this is a war of Russian aggression this is a war where Russia is breaking international law and committing war crimes. There is very clearly good and evil in this war. Ukrainians are fighting for their sovereignty and for democracy around the world and we as a country have to be very, very clear that there can be no moral equivalency in our understanding of this conflict. It's not right for Canadian public money to be supporting the screening and production of a film like this.”

Halibitch Angela 🇨🇦 🇺🇦

216,190 次观看 • 2 年前