Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Another hot take on character vs function.

19,119 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Badbrothers
Badbrothers1 год назад

“This is obviously the fault of late stage capitalism” O yea communist countries were known for their beautiful architecture

Фото профиля Skylar Romines
Skylar Romines1 год назад

Sigh. More beauty pls

Фото профиля Madebyshedrack 🦀
Madebyshedrack 🦀1 год назад

You're Obsessed with design. Lovely 👍💯💯

Фото профиля Ifeoma C. N
Ifeoma C. N1 год назад

👍🏼

Фото профиля Steve
Steve1 год назад

A symptom of Godlessness not late stage capitalism.

Фото профиля Gugu ❤️not even Satan's daughter💸
Gugu ❤️not even Satan's daughter💸1 год назад

I tweeted a few month ago that when my money is right I'm getting a lot of bespoke things. Like handmade shoes, bags, furniture, art etc.

Фото профиля Mrreg
Mrreg1 год назад

real craftsmanship requires real money. That house takes > 3x the labor of the standard cheap box house and >2x materials. If you think there's a housing crisis now, wait until this plan rolls forward. Character is nice, but nobody can afford it in the technological society.

Фото профиля La Femme Petrichor 🏳️‍⚧️
La Femme Petrichor 🏳️‍⚧️1 год назад

not a whiff of knowledge about the history of design in that take.

Фото профиля Fart dog
Fart dog1 год назад

Its already been done before, its hard to come up with original ideas.

Фото профиля 🔞 Mid Nemčúr
🔞 Mid Nemčúr1 год назад

The fancy buildings have always been funded by wealth. Wood, stone, brick houses were the cheapest way for regular people to build. Now, it’s vinyl siding, laminate, drywall, PEX. We’re living in the ruins of wealth for the most part.

Похожие видео