正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Another startup acquired on acquire.com: Seamless For Science - 61 interested buyers - 2 competing offers - 37 day acquisition timeline - 89% profit margin - 3.3x profit multiple - 3x revenue multiple - bootstrapped SaaS We are just getting started!

Andrew Gazdecki

300,983 subscribers

16,431 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

财经教育科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

We just helped a founder exit for $1,250,000 on acquire.com. Business was a bootstrapped SaaS. Multiple 4.7x profit. Took about 65 days from listing to close. Another life changing outcome.

We just helped a founder exit for $1,250,000 on acquire.com. Business was a bootstrapped SaaS. Multiple 4.7x profit. Took about 65 days from listing to close. Another life changing outcome.

Andrew Gazdecki

35,125 次观看 • 8 个月前

To be clear, I am the CEO of STRIKE. I will lead both companies. At Strike, we will continue building #Bitcoin financial services for the world, making Bitcoin more accessible for all. Today, we’re sharing some of our financials for the first time: 2024 Volume: $6B+ YOY Growth: 600% Gross Profit Margin: 85% Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC): $0 Largest Customer Cohort: $50K-$500K/month Profitability Statement: We expect to generate 8-9 figures in net profit in 2025 with just ~75 full-time employees Strike is lean, profitable, and growing. Strike operates on a #Bitcoin standard. We hold almost all of our balance sheet in #bitcoin and sweep all of our cash flow into our #bitcoin treasury. We’re just getting started at STRIKE 🫡🚀

To be clear, I am the CEO of STRIKE. I will lead both companies. At Strike, we will continue building #Bitcoin financial services for the world, making Bitcoin more accessible for all. Today, we’re sharing some of our financials for the first time: 2024 Volume: $6B+ YOY Growth: 600% Gross Profit Margin: 85% Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC): $0 Largest Customer Cohort: $50K-$500K/month Profitability Statement: We expect to generate 8-9 figures in net profit in 2025 with just ~75 full-time employees Strike is lean, profitable, and growing. Strike operates on a #Bitcoin standard. We hold almost all of our balance sheet in #bitcoin and sweep all of our cash flow into our #bitcoin treasury. We’re just getting started at STRIKE 🫡🚀

Jack Mallers

217,507 次观看 • 1 年前

From software entrepreneur to running a garbage business in 15 days. Spencer's fancy neighborhood was pissed about their new trash service. He threw up a test post on Facebook to see if people were serious enough to switch. That post got hundreds of likes and comments. So he made a simple offer: If 200 people signed up at $99 for 3 months, he'd start a new trash company. 150 signed up. $15k in the bank before he owned a single trash can. His startup costs: - A truck off Facebook Marketplace: $40k - 200 used bins from Michigan: $35 each - Some branded stickers Monthly operating costs? Just under $2k. In a bad year, this business clears $150k. A good one? $500k+. With 20% profit margins running one truck, one day per week. But the real potential in this biz…trash companies are acquisition magnets. 2-3x multiple on revenue means Spencer sell this for 7 figures when a big hauler wants to scoop up the little guys. All because his neighbors were complaining on Facebook.

From software entrepreneur to running a garbage business in 15 days. Spencer's fancy neighborhood was pissed about their new trash service. He threw up a test post on Facebook to see if people were serious enough to switch. That post got hundreds of likes and comments. So he made a simple offer: If 200 people signed up at $99 for 3 months, he'd start a new trash company. 150 signed up. $15k in the bank before he owned a single trash can. His startup costs: - A truck off Facebook Marketplace: $40k - 200 used bins from Michigan: $35 each - Some branded stickers Monthly operating costs? Just under $2k. In a bad year, this business clears $150k. A good one? $500k+. With 20% profit margins running one truck, one day per week. But the real potential in this biz…trash companies are acquisition magnets. 2-3x multiple on revenue means Spencer sell this for 7 figures when a big hauler wants to scoop up the little guys. All because his neighbors were complaining on Facebook.

Codie Sanchez

74,929 次观看 • 4 个月前

Just jumped off the Shopify Q1 Earnings call. Shopify is nearly 20 years old and I can say with confidence that you are seeing the strongest version of Shopify in our history. We are building a 100-year company and focused on delivering both growth and profitability. Here are 3 important stats from the Q1 earnings call: 1. GMV was up 23% YoY in Q1 2. Gross profit dollars for the quarter were over $950 million and our free cash flow was over $230 million, with free cash flow margin doubling year over year 3. And, we did almost $2 billion in revenue - that’s up 23% year over year (or 29% excluding Logistics) We will continue to relentlessly innovate and make commerce better for everyone. I can’t wait for you to see what we have in store for the remainder of 2024 and beyond🚀

Just jumped off the Shopify Q1 Earnings call. Shopify is nearly 20 years old and I can say with confidence that you are seeing the strongest version of Shopify in our history. We are building a 100-year company and focused on delivering both growth and profitability. Here are 3 important stats from the Q1 earnings call: 1. GMV was up 23% YoY in Q1 2. Gross profit dollars for the quarter were over $950 million and our free cash flow was over $230 million, with free cash flow margin doubling year over year 3. And, we did almost $2 billion in revenue - that’s up 23% year over year (or 29% excluding Logistics) We will continue to relentlessly innovate and make commerce better for everyone. I can’t wait for you to see what we have in store for the remainder of 2024 and beyond🚀

Harley Finkelstein

171,300 次观看 • 2 年前

Another unbelievable month behind us!🏆 We finished last month with + 80.12 Points profit in VIP 🏆 £1 Stakes £80.12 £10 Stakes £801.20 £100 Stakes £8,012.00 That's 33 Profit months out of a total 40!! Check my website for every month Not many can much those numbers 🤷🏻‍♂️ Hers the Anlaysis Group Results ⬇️ A fantastic month for us in here and tbh probably one of the best months we've ever had, The amount of place bets is insane! As singles we had 209 Winners and 281 that placed along with 37 NAPs that won and 38 that placed, Every other months is also in my website Here's are the multi bet that we landed too: 10/3 Place Bet Of The Day!✅ 6/1 Place Bet Of The Day!✅ 5.75/1 Place Bet Of The Day!✅ 59/1 Big Place Acca!✅ 11/2 Place Bet Of The Day!✅ Epsom Downs full card ew paid out 62/1 ✅ Place bet paid 58/1 ✅ 4/1 Place Bet Of The Day!✅ Doncaster full card ew paid out 18/1 ✅ Place bet paid 16/1 ✅ 17.4/1 Big Place Acca!✅ 13/2 Place Bet Of The Day!✅ 8/1 Place Bet Of The Day!✅ 5/1 Place Bet Of The Day!✅ 25/1 Big Place Acca!✅ 13/2 Place Bet Of The Day!✅ 4.6/1 Place Bet Of The Day!✅ Unbelievable stats boys and the consistency is unbelievable because we've been doing this every month from I started this group! Check comments on how to join 🤝

Another unbelievable month behind us!🏆 We finished last month with + 80.12 Points profit in VIP 🏆 £1 Stakes £80.12 £10 Stakes £801.20 £100 Stakes £8,012.00 That's 33 Profit months out of a total 40!! Check my website for every month Not many can much those numbers 🤷🏻‍♂️ Hers the Anlaysis Group Results ⬇️ A fantastic month for us in here and tbh probably one of the best months we've ever had, The amount of place bets is insane! As singles we had 209 Winners and 281 that placed along with 37 NAPs that won and 38 that placed, Every other months is also in my website Here's are the multi bet that we landed too: 10/3 Place Bet Of The Day!✅ 6/1 Place Bet Of The Day!✅ 5.75/1 Place Bet Of The Day!✅ 59/1 Big Place Acca!✅ 11/2 Place Bet Of The Day!✅ Epsom Downs full card ew paid out 62/1 ✅ Place bet paid 58/1 ✅ 4/1 Place Bet Of The Day!✅ Doncaster full card ew paid out 18/1 ✅ Place bet paid 16/1 ✅ 17.4/1 Big Place Acca!✅ 13/2 Place Bet Of The Day!✅ 8/1 Place Bet Of The Day!✅ 5/1 Place Bet Of The Day!✅ 25/1 Big Place Acca!✅ 13/2 Place Bet Of The Day!✅ 4.6/1 Place Bet Of The Day!✅ Unbelievable stats boys and the consistency is unbelievable because we've been doing this every month from I started this group! Check comments on how to join 🤝

Horse_Racing_Tips_21

22,514 次观看 • 1 年前

PROOF THAT AI IS A PONZI SCHEME (and why it's the reason for Bitcoin's crash): Nvidia just posted the most insane earnings in tech history. $31.9 billion in profit. $57 billion in revenue. 65% profit jump year-over-year. Stock rallied immediately. Then 18 hours later, it dropped 5%. And when people looked closer at the numbers, they found something absolutely wild... The Unpaid Bills Nobody Talked About: Nvidia's accounts receivable jumped to $33.4 billion. That's up 89% in one year. Translation: $33 billion worth of "sales" that haven't been paid yet. The average wait time for payment went from 46 days to 53 days. That extra week of waiting? $10.4 billion that may never turn into actual cash. They're booking revenue. But customers aren't paying. The Inventory That Shouldn't Exist: Unsold chip inventory surged 32% in three months to $19.8 billion. Meanwhile, Nvidia's CEO keeps saying demand is "insane" and they can't make chips fast enough. If demand is so crazy, why is inventory piling up? Either customers aren't buying with cash, or the demand story is bullshit. The Profit vs Cash Problem: Nvidia reported $19.3 billion in profit. But only generated $14.5 billion in actual cash flow. That's a $4.8 billion gap. Their profit-to-cash conversion is 75%. TSMC and AMD? Over 95%. When profit doesn't turn into cash, something's wrong. Here's Where It Gets Insane: The money is going in circles. And the same dollars are being counted as revenue multiple times. Follow this: - Nvidia gave xAI $2 billion - xAI borrowed $12.5 billion to buy Nvidia chips - Microsoft invested $13 billion in OpenAI - OpenAI committed $50 billion to Microsoft's cloud - Microsoft ordered $100 billion in Nvidia chips for that cloud - Oracle gave OpenAI $300 billion in cloud credits - OpenAI used those credits to order Nvidia chips for Oracle data centers The money goes in a circle. Nvidia → xAI → Nvidia Microsoft → OpenAI → Microsoft → Nvidia Oracle → OpenAI → Oracle → Nvidia Everyone books revenue. Nobody's actually paying cash. It's financial engineering disguised as growth. The Smart Money Already Left: Peter Thiel sold his Nvidia stake. SoftBank dumped massive positions. Michael Burry (the guy who called 2008) bought $1.1 billion in put options betting Nvidia crashes. They saw the numbers before everyone else did. And they got out. The Bitcoin Collapse: Bitcoin crashed almost 30% from $126,000 to $89,567. Why does this matter? AI startups use Bitcoin as collateral for loans. If Nvidia's crisis deepens, those startups get margin called. They're forced to sell Bitcoin to cover. Which crashes Bitcoin further. Which triggers more margin calls. Analysts think it could hit $52,000 if this unravels. The MIT Reality Check: OpenAI is valued at $157 billion. MIT released a study saying 95% of AI projects will never be profitable. Not "might struggle." NEVER be profitable. The entire sector is built on inflated expectations. What Happens Next: February 2026: Nvidia's Q4 report shows how many bills are 60+ days overdue. March 2026: Credit agencies start downgrading Nvidia and related companies. April 2026: First earnings restatements hit. The whole thing unwinds. Some experts are calling this a Ponzi scheme. No formal fraud investigation yet. But the structure is there: - Use new investor money to pay old investors - Inflate revenue with circular deals - Book sales before receiving cash - Keep the music playing until someone asks for their money Nvidia executives deny everything. Say it's real growth. Real demand. Real transformation. But the numbers don't lie. $10.4 billion in delayed payments. $19.8 billion in unsold inventory. $4.8 billion profit-to-cash gap. Circular funding loops inflating revenue. This is either the biggest tech transformation in history, or the biggest financial engineering scam since 2008. The next three months will tell us which one it is. What are you betting on?

PROOF THAT AI IS A PONZI SCHEME (and why it's the reason for Bitcoin's crash): Nvidia just posted the most insane earnings in tech history. $31.9 billion in profit. $57 billion in revenue. 65% profit jump year-over-year. Stock rallied immediately. Then 18 hours later, it dropped 5%. And when people looked closer at the numbers, they found something absolutely wild... The Unpaid Bills Nobody Talked About: Nvidia's accounts receivable jumped to $33.4 billion. That's up 89% in one year. Translation: $33 billion worth of "sales" that haven't been paid yet. The average wait time for payment went from 46 days to 53 days. That extra week of waiting? $10.4 billion that may never turn into actual cash. They're booking revenue. But customers aren't paying. The Inventory That Shouldn't Exist: Unsold chip inventory surged 32% in three months to $19.8 billion. Meanwhile, Nvidia's CEO keeps saying demand is "insane" and they can't make chips fast enough. If demand is so crazy, why is inventory piling up? Either customers aren't buying with cash, or the demand story is bullshit. The Profit vs Cash Problem: Nvidia reported $19.3 billion in profit. But only generated $14.5 billion in actual cash flow. That's a $4.8 billion gap. Their profit-to-cash conversion is 75%. TSMC and AMD? Over 95%. When profit doesn't turn into cash, something's wrong. Here's Where It Gets Insane: The money is going in circles. And the same dollars are being counted as revenue multiple times. Follow this: - Nvidia gave xAI $2 billion - xAI borrowed $12.5 billion to buy Nvidia chips - Microsoft invested $13 billion in OpenAI - OpenAI committed $50 billion to Microsoft's cloud - Microsoft ordered $100 billion in Nvidia chips for that cloud - Oracle gave OpenAI $300 billion in cloud credits - OpenAI used those credits to order Nvidia chips for Oracle data centers The money goes in a circle. Nvidia → xAI → Nvidia Microsoft → OpenAI → Microsoft → Nvidia Oracle → OpenAI → Oracle → Nvidia Everyone books revenue. Nobody's actually paying cash. It's financial engineering disguised as growth. The Smart Money Already Left: Peter Thiel sold his Nvidia stake. SoftBank dumped massive positions. Michael Burry (the guy who called 2008) bought $1.1 billion in put options betting Nvidia crashes. They saw the numbers before everyone else did. And they got out. The Bitcoin Collapse: Bitcoin crashed almost 30% from $126,000 to $89,567. Why does this matter? AI startups use Bitcoin as collateral for loans. If Nvidia's crisis deepens, those startups get margin called. They're forced to sell Bitcoin to cover. Which crashes Bitcoin further. Which triggers more margin calls. Analysts think it could hit $52,000 if this unravels. The MIT Reality Check: OpenAI is valued at $157 billion. MIT released a study saying 95% of AI projects will never be profitable. Not "might struggle." NEVER be profitable. The entire sector is built on inflated expectations. What Happens Next: February 2026: Nvidia's Q4 report shows how many bills are 60+ days overdue. March 2026: Credit agencies start downgrading Nvidia and related companies. April 2026: First earnings restatements hit. The whole thing unwinds. Some experts are calling this a Ponzi scheme. No formal fraud investigation yet. But the structure is there: - Use new investor money to pay old investors - Inflate revenue with circular deals - Book sales before receiving cash - Keep the music playing until someone asks for their money Nvidia executives deny everything. Say it's real growth. Real demand. Real transformation. But the numbers don't lie. $10.4 billion in delayed payments. $19.8 billion in unsold inventory. $4.8 billion profit-to-cash gap. Circular funding loops inflating revenue. This is either the biggest tech transformation in history, or the biggest financial engineering scam since 2008. The next three months will tell us which one it is. What are you betting on?

Ricardo

212,902 次观看 • 8 个月前

Nathan rolled up 11 tiny (<$1M EBITDA) HVAC companies, paying low 3x multiples. Now PE is interested in buying the group, and Nathan is already planning to do it all over again. “I see a lot of opportunity in taking these really small mom-and-pop shops and building them up to the lower end of what a PE firm would be interested in acquiring. You can pick them up at 3x, sell them at 10x and repeat that process over and over.” But this story almost ended before it began... After acquiring his first two companies with an SBA loan, Nathan watched revenue collapse, burned through his cash, nearly lost his father's retirement savings and came dangerously close to bankruptcy. The turning point was a complete rethink of incentives, compensation and how to build an acquisition platform that actually compounds. Give it a listen. I hope you appreciate Nathan Lindley extreme transparency on everything, even him sharing how he overcame daily stress through drinking and how, to this day, he is still paying down his SBA note of $8,500 a month… Year six of 10 years on that. It’s very hard out there. Timestamps: 0:00 Nathan's 11 acquisitions and $16M run-rate HVAC platform 0:25 From the first deal in 2020 to acquisition #11 1:24 From book publishing to buying HVAC businesses 3:55 Selling real estate to fund the first acquisition 4:33 Buying a one-technician HVAC company—and the costly assumptions that followed 7:58 Losing 40% of revenue almost immediately after closing 10:26 Acquisition #2 makes every problem much bigger 11:20 Running out of cash—twice 14:18 The decision to put everyone on commission 15:15 Every employee quits on the same day 16:21 The Indeed hire who changed the entire business 18:59 Fear, alcohol and nearly going bankrupt 23:13 One technician outperforms the rest of the company 25:52 Why Nathan waited a full year before doing acquisition #3 27:00 Acquisitions #3 and #4—and buying businesses the second time around 28:46 How his M&A due diligence completely changed 29:30 The "buying at-bats" framework for acquisitions 33:08 Why Lindley spends almost nothing on marketing 34:15 Turning acquired customer databases into new revenue 36:27 Hiring exceptional technicians and building repeatable systems 37:35 The company today: 50 employees across three markets 39:13 How Lindley integrates acquired businesses 42:38 Teaching acquired technicians to double their income 43:17 The acquisitions that didn't work—and why 46:47 Planning an exit and doing it all over again 49:04 Where to connect with Nathan

Nathan rolled up 11 tiny (<$1M EBITDA) HVAC companies, paying low 3x multiples. Now PE is interested in buying the group, and Nathan is already planning to do it all over again. “I see a lot of opportunity in taking these really small mom-and-pop shops and building them up to the lower end of what a PE firm would be interested in acquiring. You can pick them up at 3x, sell them at 10x and repeat that process over and over.” But this story almost ended before it began... After acquiring his first two companies with an SBA loan, Nathan watched revenue collapse, burned through his cash, nearly lost his father's retirement savings and came dangerously close to bankruptcy. The turning point was a complete rethink of incentives, compensation and how to build an acquisition platform that actually compounds. Give it a listen. I hope you appreciate Nathan Lindley extreme transparency on everything, even him sharing how he overcame daily stress through drinking and how, to this day, he is still paying down his SBA note of $8,500 a month… Year six of 10 years on that. It’s very hard out there. Timestamps: 0:00 Nathan's 11 acquisitions and $16M run-rate HVAC platform 0:25 From the first deal in 2020 to acquisition #11 1:24 From book publishing to buying HVAC businesses 3:55 Selling real estate to fund the first acquisition 4:33 Buying a one-technician HVAC company—and the costly assumptions that followed 7:58 Losing 40% of revenue almost immediately after closing 10:26 Acquisition #2 makes every problem much bigger 11:20 Running out of cash—twice 14:18 The decision to put everyone on commission 15:15 Every employee quits on the same day 16:21 The Indeed hire who changed the entire business 18:59 Fear, alcohol and nearly going bankrupt 23:13 One technician outperforms the rest of the company 25:52 Why Nathan waited a full year before doing acquisition #3 27:00 Acquisitions #3 and #4—and buying businesses the second time around 28:46 How his M&A due diligence completely changed 29:30 The "buying at-bats" framework for acquisitions 33:08 Why Lindley spends almost nothing on marketing 34:15 Turning acquired customer databases into new revenue 36:27 Hiring exceptional technicians and building repeatable systems 37:35 The company today: 50 employees across three markets 39:13 How Lindley integrates acquired businesses 42:38 Teaching acquired technicians to double their income 43:17 The acquisitions that didn't work—and why 46:47 Planning an exit and doing it all over again 49:04 Where to connect with Nathan

PrivateEquityGuy (Mikk Markus)

136,807 次观看 • 1 个月前

Pieter Levels makes over $250,000 a month -> alone, from a laptop, with zero employees no co-founder. no investors. no team. just him and a backpack, moving between countries he started by daring himself to launch 12 startups in 12 months. then he kept going -> 70+ products over the years, and most of them flopped he doesn't plan. no roadmaps, no polishing for months. he ships before it's "ready" and kills anything that gets no traction within weeks one throwaway experiment -> an AI photo app he built the day after a tweet went viral -> hit $77,000/month within a year. today it does over $130,000/month on its own he still writes everything in old-school PHP. every error gets piped straight to his Telegram. ~95% of the revenue is pure profit even Andrej Karpathy said this is the model for the future: one person running multiple companies the clip below is him explaining exactly how ↓

Pieter Levels makes over $250,000 a month -> alone, from a laptop, with zero employees no co-founder. no investors. no team. just him and a backpack, moving between countries he started by daring himself to launch 12 startups in 12 months. then he kept going -> 70+ products over the years, and most of them flopped he doesn't plan. no roadmaps, no polishing for months. he ships before it's "ready" and kills anything that gets no traction within weeks one throwaway experiment -> an AI photo app he built the day after a tweet went viral -> hit $77,000/month within a year. today it does over $130,000/month on its own he still writes everything in old-school PHP. every error gets piped straight to his Telegram. ~95% of the revenue is pure profit even Andrej Karpathy said this is the model for the future: one person running multiple companies the clip below is him explaining exactly how ↓

Ridark

480,525 次观看 • 1 个月前

I just jumped off Shopify’s Q2 2024 Earnings Call. Shopify had a great quarter and we continue to push the envelope of what’s possible in commerce. ICYMI, here are the highlights of Q2 2024 Shopify: 1️⃣ We passed a major milestone: Shopify has officially processed 1 TRILLION dollars in cumulative GMV 2️⃣ We delivered on the financials: - Gross Profit in Q2 was $1 billion dollars - up 25% YoY and grew faster than revenue which was $2 billion for the quarter - Our free cash flow margin more than doubled to 16% from 6% last year - This is our fourth consecutive quarter of double-digit free cash flow margin 3️⃣ Brands continue to flock to Shopify; Casper, Away luggage, Tonal, Vince Camuto, Ami Paris, Therabody, and legacy brands like QVC and Barnes and Noble all joined Shopify. ⚡We aren’t just helping brands thrive online, but also offline in physical retail. Our offline business surpassed $100 billion in cumulative GMV. Brands like Mejuri and Evereve launched online and offline with Shopify, and Oak + Fort launched online and rolled out Shopify POS in over 40 locations. ⚡B2B continues to grow. Shopify had its single largest GMV month ever for our B2B business and B2B grew more than 140% YoY. We had incredible operational discipline, and we nailed the execution of the plan we laid out. We are so well positioned to power commerce for years to come. Thank you to everyone on the Shopify team, our partners, and our incredible community for an exceptional quarter🚀

I just jumped off Shopify’s Q2 2024 Earnings Call. Shopify had a great quarter and we continue to push the envelope of what’s possible in commerce. ICYMI, here are the highlights of Q2 2024 Shopify: 1️⃣ We passed a major milestone: Shopify has officially processed 1 TRILLION dollars in cumulative GMV 2️⃣ We delivered on the financials: - Gross Profit in Q2 was $1 billion dollars - up 25% YoY and grew faster than revenue which was $2 billion for the quarter - Our free cash flow margin more than doubled to 16% from 6% last year - This is our fourth consecutive quarter of double-digit free cash flow margin 3️⃣ Brands continue to flock to Shopify; Casper, Away luggage, Tonal, Vince Camuto, Ami Paris, Therabody, and legacy brands like QVC and Barnes and Noble all joined Shopify. ⚡We aren’t just helping brands thrive online, but also offline in physical retail. Our offline business surpassed $100 billion in cumulative GMV. Brands like Mejuri and Evereve launched online and offline with Shopify, and Oak + Fort launched online and rolled out Shopify POS in over 40 locations. ⚡B2B continues to grow. Shopify had its single largest GMV month ever for our B2B business and B2B grew more than 140% YoY. We had incredible operational discipline, and we nailed the execution of the plan we laid out. We are so well positioned to power commerce for years to come. Thank you to everyone on the Shopify team, our partners, and our incredible community for an exceptional quarter🚀

Harley Finkelstein

161,958 次观看 • 2 年前

This poor woman is living every “I bought some land and wanted to be a cute farm girl” fantasy we see on social media… except it’s the unfiltered version 😂 She started with just 2 chickens, then for her 40th birthday decided to treat herself to 2 peacocks… and somehow that turned into 10 peacocks. Now she’s at 4 dogs, 4 cats, 50 chickens, and the peacocks are roaming multiple neighborhoods, getting on roofs, and one even stopped traffic on a busy highway with his tail feathers fully fanned out. She’s officially over it, openly offering to rehome the peacocks, and just found out they can live up to 50 years 😭 Farm life is adorable… until the animals start running the show and you’re getting calls from neighbors while you’re just trying to buy eyeshadow at Ulta. Have you ever had one of those “what have I gotten myself into?!” moments with animals or homesteading?

This poor woman is living every “I bought some land and wanted to be a cute farm girl” fantasy we see on social media… except it’s the unfiltered version 😂 She started with just 2 chickens, then for her 40th birthday decided to treat herself to 2 peacocks… and somehow that turned into 10 peacocks. Now she’s at 4 dogs, 4 cats, 50 chickens, and the peacocks are roaming multiple neighborhoods, getting on roofs, and one even stopped traffic on a busy highway with his tail feathers fully fanned out. She’s officially over it, openly offering to rehome the peacocks, and just found out they can live up to 50 years 😭 Farm life is adorable… until the animals start running the show and you’re getting calls from neighbors while you’re just trying to buy eyeshadow at Ulta. Have you ever had one of those “what have I gotten myself into?!” moments with animals or homesteading?

End3of6Days9 (Helen) 🇺🇸

596,247 次观看 • 3 个月前

Black people and a New Southern Strategy are the way forward. Democrats keep chasing the dream that they can convince the majority of white America to consider all Americans—but consistently, the majority shows you where they stand. Considering that, we as Black people and those who truly focus on a society for all should push for a base-focused approach. Just look at two races from last night. Instead of spending $166 million in Texas and $50 million in Ohio on losses, investing $90 million each in states like Louisiana (33% Black) and Mississippi (37% Black) could mean victory. The proof is in Georgia’s win. Louisiana had a Democrat as governor for 8 years, but Democrats invested almost nothing in the state over the last decade. If we want real change, we need to invest where our voices matter most. I have a lot of feelings. I’ll unpack those another day, I might say too much right now. I just want those who are actually asking what next to understand, we have power to do something. Senate races in multiple southern states are in 2 years. Move the conversation toward our power not just the problem. #KeepPushing #CivicsForThePeople #NewSouthernStrategy #BlackVoterPower #BaseFocusedApproach

Black people and a New Southern Strategy are the way forward. Democrats keep chasing the dream that they can convince the majority of white America to consider all Americans—but consistently, the majority shows you where they stand. Considering that, we as Black people and those who truly focus on a society for all should push for a base-focused approach. Just look at two races from last night. Instead of spending $166 million in Texas and $50 million in Ohio on losses, investing $90 million each in states like Louisiana (33% Black) and Mississippi (37% Black) could mean victory. The proof is in Georgia’s win. Louisiana had a Democrat as governor for 8 years, but Democrats invested almost nothing in the state over the last decade. If we want real change, we need to invest where our voices matter most. I have a lot of feelings. I’ll unpack those another day, I might say too much right now. I just want those who are actually asking what next to understand, we have power to do something. Senate races in multiple southern states are in 2 years. Move the conversation toward our power not just the problem. #KeepPushing #CivicsForThePeople #NewSouthernStrategy #BlackVoterPower #BaseFocusedApproach

Gary Chambers

277,691 次观看 • 1 年前

Meta literally spent $72 BILLION building AI infrastructure that generates ZERO revenue. Then a Chinese company launches an AI agent in March, hits $125 million in revenue by December, and Zuck writes a $2 billion check in 10 days. But this isn't a strategic acquisition... It's panic. Here's what happened: Meta has been burning cash on AI for years. Building data centers. Hiring researchers. Training models. Claiming they're building "superintelligence." The problem: None of it makes money. Meta AI is free. Their models are open source. Their chatbots generate zero revenue. Meanwhile, investors are getting twitchy about the $72 billion infrastructure spending spree with no clear path to profitability. Enter Manus. A startup that launched 8 months ago. Founded in Beijing. Chinese founders. Moved to Singapore in June. March 2025: Manus launches with a viral demo video showing an AI agent that screens job candidates, plans vacations, analyzes stock portfolios. April 2025: Benchmark leads a $75M funding round at $500M valuation. US Senator John Cornyn immediately drags them for investing in a Chinese AI company, asking "who thought it was a good idea for American investors to subsidize our biggest adversary in AI?" December 2025: Manus announces $100M in annual recurring revenue. The fastest startup in HISTORY to hit that milestone. Revenue run rate: $125M. That's when Meta started negotiating. The deal closed in 10 days for ~$2 billion. Meta paid 4x the valuation from 8 months ago for a company that's ACTUALLY making money from AI. Here's why this matters: Manus hit $125M revenue in 8 months. Meta spent $72B on AI and has generated exactly $0 in AI-specific revenue. Zuck couldn't build profitability, so he bought it. But there's a problem. Manus has Chinese founders. Started in Beijing. Backed by Tencent and HongShan Capital (formerly Sequoia China). In the current geopolitical climate, that's radioactive. So Meta immediately issued a statement: "There will be no continuing Chinese ownership interests in Manus following the transaction, and Manus will discontinue its services and operations in China." Translation: We're buying your revenue and your team, cutting all Chinese ties, and pretending this was always an American company. This is geopolitical cleanup. The numbers tell the real story: Manus processed 147 trillion tokens in 8 months. Created 80 million virtual computers. Hit $100M ARR faster than any startup in history. Meta spent years and $72 billion trying to build this and failed. So they panic-bought the Chinese company that figured it out in 8 months. Meanwhile, this is Meta's third major AI acquisition THIS YEAR: June: Bought 49% of Scale AI for $14 billion to get CEO Alexandr Wang. Earlier this month: Acquired AI-wearables startup Limitless. Now: Manus for $2B. Meta's AI strategy is literally pay-to-win. Because after burning $72 billion, they still can't answer the one question investors keep asking: "When does AI make money?" Manus answered that question in 8 months. Meta couldn't answer it in 3 years. The craziest part: Manus charges $39-$199/month for subscriptions. That's it. No fancy enterprise deals. No complex pricing. Just a simple SaaS model that actually works. And it took a Chinese startup to figure out what Silicon Valley couldn't: people will pay for AI that actually does work instead of just answering questions. So Zuck wrote a $2 billion check, promised to cut all Chinese ownership, and is now claiming credit for "accelerating AI innovation." But everyone watching knows the truth... Meta spent $72B building infrastructure for a business they couldn't figure out how to monetize. Then they bought the company that cracked the code in 8 months. The AI race isn't about who builds the best models. It's about who builds a business that actually makes money. And right now, Meta just admitted they can't do it alone.

Meta literally spent $72 BILLION building AI infrastructure that generates ZERO revenue. Then a Chinese company launches an AI agent in March, hits $125 million in revenue by December, and Zuck writes a $2 billion check in 10 days. But this isn't a strategic acquisition... It's panic. Here's what happened: Meta has been burning cash on AI for years. Building data centers. Hiring researchers. Training models. Claiming they're building "superintelligence." The problem: None of it makes money. Meta AI is free. Their models are open source. Their chatbots generate zero revenue. Meanwhile, investors are getting twitchy about the $72 billion infrastructure spending spree with no clear path to profitability. Enter Manus. A startup that launched 8 months ago. Founded in Beijing. Chinese founders. Moved to Singapore in June. March 2025: Manus launches with a viral demo video showing an AI agent that screens job candidates, plans vacations, analyzes stock portfolios. April 2025: Benchmark leads a $75M funding round at $500M valuation. US Senator John Cornyn immediately drags them for investing in a Chinese AI company, asking "who thought it was a good idea for American investors to subsidize our biggest adversary in AI?" December 2025: Manus announces $100M in annual recurring revenue. The fastest startup in HISTORY to hit that milestone. Revenue run rate: $125M. That's when Meta started negotiating. The deal closed in 10 days for ~$2 billion. Meta paid 4x the valuation from 8 months ago for a company that's ACTUALLY making money from AI. Here's why this matters: Manus hit $125M revenue in 8 months. Meta spent $72B on AI and has generated exactly $0 in AI-specific revenue. Zuck couldn't build profitability, so he bought it. But there's a problem. Manus has Chinese founders. Started in Beijing. Backed by Tencent and HongShan Capital (formerly Sequoia China). In the current geopolitical climate, that's radioactive. So Meta immediately issued a statement: "There will be no continuing Chinese ownership interests in Manus following the transaction, and Manus will discontinue its services and operations in China." Translation: We're buying your revenue and your team, cutting all Chinese ties, and pretending this was always an American company. This is geopolitical cleanup. The numbers tell the real story: Manus processed 147 trillion tokens in 8 months. Created 80 million virtual computers. Hit $100M ARR faster than any startup in history. Meta spent years and $72 billion trying to build this and failed. So they panic-bought the Chinese company that figured it out in 8 months. Meanwhile, this is Meta's third major AI acquisition THIS YEAR: June: Bought 49% of Scale AI for $14 billion to get CEO Alexandr Wang. Earlier this month: Acquired AI-wearables startup Limitless. Now: Manus for $2B. Meta's AI strategy is literally pay-to-win. Because after burning $72 billion, they still can't answer the one question investors keep asking: "When does AI make money?" Manus answered that question in 8 months. Meta couldn't answer it in 3 years. The craziest part: Manus charges $39-$199/month for subscriptions. That's it. No fancy enterprise deals. No complex pricing. Just a simple SaaS model that actually works. And it took a Chinese startup to figure out what Silicon Valley couldn't: people will pay for AI that actually does work instead of just answering questions. So Zuck wrote a $2 billion check, promised to cut all Chinese ownership, and is now claiming credit for "accelerating AI innovation." But everyone watching knows the truth... Meta spent $72B building infrastructure for a business they couldn't figure out how to monetize. Then they bought the company that cracked the code in 8 months. The AI race isn't about who builds the best models. It's about who builds a business that actually makes money. And right now, Meta just admitted they can't do it alone.

Ricardo

98,070 次观看 • 7 个月前

My app just hit $7.8k/m in revenue. This is how I'm running ads for mobile apps. To hit 10k/m before I quit my job & fly to Vietnam 🇻🇳 Part One: Apple Ads (First $1k/m). • Repeated this a lot so to summarise: 1. $100 free ad credits, ez mode. 2. Run strict keywords on competitor names. 3. Split into tiers for countries & scale the max bid. 4. Use RevenueCat or Superwall for attribution. 5. Give ad spend & transactions to claude: find winners. 6. Measure the onboarding: tighten funnel. 7. Daily budget can be low at first, like $20. 8. The max bid is the important variable here. 9. This will get you to $1k/m. Part Two: TikSl0p Ads ($1k to $10k) • This is much harder to make profit. • But when you do, it's exponential. • Read Open Book's guide on this first. 1. Make ~6 formats, ~12 creatives. 2. Leave campaign targeting super broad. 3. I do $70/day of campaign budget spend. 4. No demographic or interest settings. 5. Let the algorithm find your perfect user. 6. Give each creative $50 of ad spend. 7. After $50, if (close to) profitable then scale. 8. If no profit, then stop the posts. 9. Use realised LTV to begin with. 10. Simple: revenue / paid customers. 11. 400 IQ chad: aim for profit on initial transaction. 12. Ask Rico for unrealised LTV. Can be hard to calculate. 13. Expect to burn a few hundred $$ to find profit. Notes: If you none of your creatives are profitable, then go back to the drawing board and try again. You're taking $50 gambles each time. When you find a winner, it'll repay the initial investments 100x! This is a game of pain tolerance. You need to be able to stomach losing hundreds of $$$ without seeing any returns. Part Three: Scaling. 1. If you're consistently getting > 2x ROAS. 2. Up your campaign budget by 15%. 3. Do NOT increase more than 30%. 4. Otherwise I will be very very cross with you. 5. You'll kill performance. 6. Performance can be volatile. • Measure ROAS over weeks, not days Notes: When you've found a winning creative, create multiple variations of it. We're talking 100 different kinds. I'm being lazy and need to do this more!! Part Four: Experimental Ad Spend ($10k +). • This is the next level: I've gone 0-1. • I've not seen much sauce on X about scaling past this. • So, this is where I'm at now. I'll share it with all of you. My current position is: 1. Trying out other platforms: Meta, IG, etc 2. Continue reinvesting the profits from previous ads. 3. I'm trying multiple new avenues right now: • Paid influencers, UGC, slideshowmaxxing, etc. Keep pushing, we're all gonna win.

My app just hit $7.8k/m in revenue. This is how I'm running ads for mobile apps. To hit 10k/m before I quit my job & fly to Vietnam 🇻🇳 Part One: Apple Ads (First $1k/m). • Repeated this a lot so to summarise: 1. $100 free ad credits, ez mode. 2. Run strict keywords on competitor names. 3. Split into tiers for countries & scale the max bid. 4. Use RevenueCat or Superwall for attribution. 5. Give ad spend & transactions to claude: find winners. 6. Measure the onboarding: tighten funnel. 7. Daily budget can be low at first, like $20. 8. The max bid is the important variable here. 9. This will get you to $1k/m. Part Two: TikSl0p Ads ($1k to $10k) • This is much harder to make profit. • But when you do, it's exponential. • Read Open Book's guide on this first. 1. Make ~6 formats, ~12 creatives. 2. Leave campaign targeting super broad. 3. I do $70/day of campaign budget spend. 4. No demographic or interest settings. 5. Let the algorithm find your perfect user. 6. Give each creative $50 of ad spend. 7. After $50, if (close to) profitable then scale. 8. If no profit, then stop the posts. 9. Use realised LTV to begin with. 10. Simple: revenue / paid customers. 11. 400 IQ chad: aim for profit on initial transaction. 12. Ask Rico for unrealised LTV. Can be hard to calculate. 13. Expect to burn a few hundred $$ to find profit. Notes: If you none of your creatives are profitable, then go back to the drawing board and try again. You're taking $50 gambles each time. When you find a winner, it'll repay the initial investments 100x! This is a game of pain tolerance. You need to be able to stomach losing hundreds of $$$ without seeing any returns. Part Three: Scaling. 1. If you're consistently getting > 2x ROAS. 2. Up your campaign budget by 15%. 3. Do NOT increase more than 30%. 4. Otherwise I will be very very cross with you. 5. You'll kill performance. 6. Performance can be volatile. • Measure ROAS over weeks, not days Notes: When you've found a winning creative, create multiple variations of it. We're talking 100 different kinds. I'm being lazy and need to do this more!! Part Four: Experimental Ad Spend ($10k +). • This is the next level: I've gone 0-1. • I've not seen much sauce on X about scaling past this. • So, this is where I'm at now. I'll share it with all of you. My current position is: 1. Trying out other platforms: Meta, IG, etc 2. Continue reinvesting the profits from previous ads. 3. I'm trying multiple new avenues right now: • Paid influencers, UGC, slideshowmaxxing, etc. Keep pushing, we're all gonna win.

Frederick James

16,140 次观看 • 10 天前

FundedNext is entering a bold new era! 🚀 Today marks a major milestone in our journey, the 3rd anniversary of FundedNext - and we’re celebrating the day by proudly unveiling our new logo ‘FN’ and an inspiring vision: “For every trader, every market.” The statement focuses on FN’s vision of a unified trading ecosystem, built for any trader, anywhere around the globe. With this new identity, FN (FundedNext) is taking its next big step, beginning with the consecutive launches of a Futures Prop Trading firm and a CFD brokerage. This is just the beginning of something bigger! FN (FundedNext) looks forward to bridging the gap between proprietary trading, brokerage, and diversified solutions, creating a seamless environment where traders can grow, connect, and trade across multiple asset classes. More opportunities, same unmatched 15% profit share from challenge phase profits, 24-hour payouts, and trader-first solutions! The next era of trading starts now—are you ready?

FundedNext

43,813 次观看 • 1 年前

If the Albanese government was serious about exploitation by foreign investors in Australias housing market, they would ensure that buyers have to provide their tax file number to their conveyance lawyer upon purchasing a property. The idea that the ATO can thoroughly match stamp duty payments with a buyers citizenship papers is unrealistic as this clip confirms. It's a pity the ATO didn't crack down on offshore profit shifting with the same vigour it cracked down on small businesses. As the attached article highlights • $35 billion in losses have been claimed by foreign property investors which begs the question as to how much in income hasn't been declared. People First will ban non-citizens from buying residential property (along with Agriculture and Infrastructure). For existing properties owned by foreigners we will request that Real Estate agents withhold 50% of rental payments made to landlords who fail to provide a tax file number to stop offshore profit shifting. We will also charge a minimum 30% on profits from rental properties. Learn more at ••••••••••••••••• "The Australian Taxation Office released its 2024 financial year data in June, and it shows more than 34,000 nonresidents claimed net rent losses worth a combined $473m. It's almost four times the number of Australians who signed up as rentvestors in the same year. The loss entitles the owner to a reduction in the tax on their rental income, but for super wealthy internationals getting rent from multiple properties or with other income it opens the door to a negative gearing claim. Over the past decade, the total for rental losses claimed in tax returns by non-residents was $35bn. Across the same timeline the tax data shows $68.6bn in rent interest deductions were also claimed, as well as $10.5bn in rent capital works deductions and even $65bn in "other" rental deductions.

If the Albanese government was serious about exploitation by foreign investors in Australias housing market, they would ensure that buyers have to provide their tax file number to their conveyance lawyer upon purchasing a property. The idea that the ATO can thoroughly match stamp duty payments with a buyers citizenship papers is unrealistic as this clip confirms. It's a pity the ATO didn't crack down on offshore profit shifting with the same vigour it cracked down on small businesses. As the attached article highlights • $35 billion in losses have been claimed by foreign property investors which begs the question as to how much in income hasn't been declared. People First will ban non-citizens from buying residential property (along with Agriculture and Infrastructure). For existing properties owned by foreigners we will request that Real Estate agents withhold 50% of rental payments made to landlords who fail to provide a tax file number to stop offshore profit shifting. We will also charge a minimum 30% on profits from rental properties. Learn more at ••••••••••••••••• "The Australian Taxation Office released its 2024 financial year data in June, and it shows more than 34,000 nonresidents claimed net rent losses worth a combined $473m. It's almost four times the number of Australians who signed up as rentvestors in the same year. The loss entitles the owner to a reduction in the tax on their rental income, but for super wealthy internationals getting rent from multiple properties or with other income it opens the door to a negative gearing claim. Over the past decade, the total for rental losses claimed in tax returns by non-residents was $35bn. Across the same timeline the tax data shows $68.6bn in rent interest deductions were also claimed, as well as $10.5bn in rent capital works deductions and even $65bn in "other" rental deductions.

Gerard Rennick

18,078 次观看 • 23 天前

Yep. I said imminent & $ALCH is now at 21 cents for another cool $100k profit. Next stop, 2x to 40 cents on its way to $1. Load up. $snai & $edwin are next biggest bags. $collat I'm starting to load up on too. You are advised to load up on ALCHEMIST AI 🔮 immediately $alch is unstoppable & creating generational wealth when crypto melted down all year. Imagine the face melting $alch is now going to do with a bull run of great market conditions. Its made me a million dollars since feb 23 when I sold my 3 btc that was doing nothing & loaded up on $alch at 2 cents & it's just getting started now at 21 cents. $nsai $near $icp $Tao $render $story $griff $snai $fet $sei $get $bdx $grass $Kaito $aix $neur $clank $anon $asm $opul $sol $real $see $ava #jobseek $fart $doge $shib $pepe $bonk $trump $floki $wif $pengu $sse $arc $pvs $sui $lens $drip $bubb $dark $pvs $bst

Yep. I said imminent & $ALCH is now at 21 cents for another cool $100k profit. Next stop, 2x to 40 cents on its way to $1. Load up. $snai & $edwin are next biggest bags. $collat I'm starting to load up on too. You are advised to load up on ALCHEMIST AI 🔮 immediately $alch is unstoppable & creating generational wealth when crypto melted down all year. Imagine the face melting $alch is now going to do with a bull run of great market conditions. Its made me a million dollars since feb 23 when I sold my 3 btc that was doing nothing & loaded up on $alch at 2 cents & it's just getting started now at 21 cents. $nsai $near $icp $Tao $render $story $griff $snai $fet $sei $get $bdx $grass $Kaito $aix $neur $clank $anon $asm $opul $sol $real $see $ava #jobseek $fart $doge $shib $pepe $bonk $trump $floki $wif $pengu $sse $arc $pvs $sui $lens $drip $bubb $dark $pvs $bst

Cole Bartiromo the Dollar Scholar

29,324 次观看 • 1 年前

things keeping me up at night about where AI is actually going: 1. "ambient businesses" are coming. basically, agents monitor the market, handle customers, execute decisions. you check in every few days. 7-8 figure businesses with almost no daily human input. we're early but it's happening. 2. you can now build a company in an hour. grab an idea, vibe code it, add stripe, get a customer. the old timeline was 12 months to first revenue. that's just gone. 3. the internet went app store era → API economy → agent economy. we're now in the part where agents hire other agents on the fly. fixed tech stacks are dissolving. nobody's built the glassdoor for AI agents yet. 4. vertical AI is replacing headcount. that's 10x the market that vertical SaaS ever touched. boring industries like insurance, construction, legal, elder care are the goldmine. 5. SaaS pricing is flipping from per seat to per result. someone is going to build a billion dollar business just by converting legacy SaaS companies to outcome based pricing 6. a whole graveyard of generic SaaS is coming. basic CRMs, analytics dashboards, template marketplaces, scheduling tools. agents just do it better. lots of incumbent saas that are generic and not reinventing themselves right now will struggle/reprice. 7. "human made" is becoming the new luxury. porsche already ran a 100% human made ad campaign. no AI is going to be a premium label like organic is for food. there's a real business in that certification. 8. IRL is having a renaissance. when everything is AI generated, being in a room with other humans becomes scarce. karaoke bars, escape rooms, live music, co-working. the experience economy is accelerating. 9. founder market fit is dead. founder agent fit is what matters now. can you direct a fleet of agents like a film director? that's the new unfair advantage. 10. ghost team org charts are coming. two real people, twelve agents with names, faces, personalities. your about page is going to look the same 11. 1000 true fans is now 100. agents cut your costs so much that 100 customers at $500/mo is a real solo business. micro monopolies across multiple niches. this is the playbook. 12. context window poisoning is the new phishing. cybersecurity hasn't caught up. agents have access to your files, email, bank accounts. bad things are going to happen. it's also a massive startup opportunity. 13. the window is open for maybe 12-24 months. then the moats get built like data, brand, trust, network 14. build cost is basically zero. audiences are underpriced. niches are wide open. idk about you but i'm not sleeping much so much opportunity this is the most asymmetric time to be building a startup. full episode on The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃 to get your creative juices flowing (latest episode get it where you listen/watch pods) no advertisers, just pure ideas to help you im rooting for you don't just bookmark share with a friend watch

GREG ISENBERG

148,998 次观看 • 4 个月前

I've been digging into startup ideas that are obvious in hindsight but somehow still unbuilt And I've got a cash-flowing startup idea for you today... 84% of solo female travelers report feeling unsafe, yet every major travel platform still prioritizes thread counts and breakfast reviews over the basic question: "Can I walk back to my hotel at night?" Women are planning trips by scrolling Reddit threads from 2019, cross-referencing TikToks, and getting safety advice from male backpackers who've never experienced the same risks. It's insane that this is still the state of travel tech in 2025 and going into 2026. Solo female travel is exploding with 71% of solo travelers are now women, searches are up 131% YoY yet they're using tools built for a different era and different concerns. The solution: a map-based safety layer where verified female travelers rate neighborhoods on metrics that actually matter. Green zones for "walked alone at midnight, felt fine." Red zones for "multiple harassment reports." Real data on lighting, staff responsiveness, actual safety. Kinda like what Pieter Levels built with Hoodmaps but in a new category. Distribution is 400K+ member travel Facebook groups, and paying micro travel influencers to create content about it. Monetization is $30/month memberships + $500/month hotel safety certifications. The demand is screaming at you from every travel forum. Why I like the idea: - makes the world a better place - possible to vibe code - proven biz model - creators in the space open to sponsorship at reasonable prices - prob not a venture backable product but still opportunity for someone who is interested in cash flow - Probably gets acquired by Expedia or something down the road if you nail PMF. In today's episode of The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃 (are you following?) this startup idea broken down with... 1 trend im paying attention to 1 news item im paying attention 1 startup framework I love 1 AI product I'm interested in using hope it gets the creative juices flowing and is 100% free all i ask is you don't just bookmark this tweet, but you go out and build i want to see you win. this is the greatest time in history to be building. happy building.

I've been digging into startup ideas that are obvious in hindsight but somehow still unbuilt And I've got a cash-flowing startup idea for you today... 84% of solo female travelers report feeling unsafe, yet every major travel platform still prioritizes thread counts and breakfast reviews over the basic question: "Can I walk back to my hotel at night?" Women are planning trips by scrolling Reddit threads from 2019, cross-referencing TikToks, and getting safety advice from male backpackers who've never experienced the same risks. It's insane that this is still the state of travel tech in 2025 and going into 2026. Solo female travel is exploding with 71% of solo travelers are now women, searches are up 131% YoY yet they're using tools built for a different era and different concerns. The solution: a map-based safety layer where verified female travelers rate neighborhoods on metrics that actually matter. Green zones for "walked alone at midnight, felt fine." Red zones for "multiple harassment reports." Real data on lighting, staff responsiveness, actual safety. Kinda like what Pieter Levels built with Hoodmaps but in a new category. Distribution is 400K+ member travel Facebook groups, and paying micro travel influencers to create content about it. Monetization is $30/month memberships + $500/month hotel safety certifications. The demand is screaming at you from every travel forum. Why I like the idea: - makes the world a better place - possible to vibe code - proven biz model - creators in the space open to sponsorship at reasonable prices - prob not a venture backable product but still opportunity for someone who is interested in cash flow - Probably gets acquired by Expedia or something down the road if you nail PMF. In today's episode of The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃 (are you following?) this startup idea broken down with... 1 trend im paying attention to 1 news item im paying attention 1 startup framework I love 1 AI product I'm interested in using hope it gets the creative juices flowing and is 100% free all i ask is you don't just bookmark this tweet, but you go out and build i want to see you win. this is the greatest time in history to be building. happy building.

GREG ISENBERG

71,068 次观看 • 8 个月前

I keep buying $MURAD right now Dev is doing their best to put 1,400 holders back in profit after the recent ATH You may ask me why we returned to $1M mcap? But look at what is happening to the market right now: People are panicking after Iran’s overnight attacks. Oil is rising again. But we all know this instability will end soon. Even now, after the overnight correction, $MURAD is still trading above $1 MILLION. Just imagine the pump that could be waiting for us when markets stabilize again. Dev continues doing buybacks every $1 million in market cap. Yesterday we hit $2M market cap. So today I expect team to make second $15,000 buyback. And all tokens from those buys are sent to Murad. YOU CAN PUT A GUN TO MY HEAD And I will still tell you the same thing: Even at a $100K mcap $MURAD looks better than $ANSEM Why? Because the upside on a lowcap is multiple times higher ANSEM already reached nearly $400M mcap Where could it go now? $500M. $600M. $1B. In the best case scenario it will make only 2-3x If $MURAD hits at least $10M market cap, We will make over 10x from this price Buybacks. Airdrop for #SPX6900 holders This is how new 100x runners are born Only true believers will be left for the run to millions Mark my words...

I keep buying $MURAD right now Dev is doing their best to put 1,400 holders back in profit after the recent ATH You may ask me why we returned to $1M mcap? But look at what is happening to the market right now: People are panicking after Iran’s overnight attacks. Oil is rising again. But we all know this instability will end soon. Even now, after the overnight correction, $MURAD is still trading above $1 MILLION. Just imagine the pump that could be waiting for us when markets stabilize again. Dev continues doing buybacks every $1 million in market cap. Yesterday we hit $2M market cap. So today I expect team to make second $15,000 buyback. And all tokens from those buys are sent to Murad. YOU CAN PUT A GUN TO MY HEAD And I will still tell you the same thing: Even at a $100K mcap $MURAD looks better than $ANSEM Why? Because the upside on a lowcap is multiple times higher ANSEM already reached nearly $400M mcap Where could it go now? $500M. $600M. $1B. In the best case scenario it will make only 2-3x If $MURAD hits at least $10M market cap, We will make over 10x from this price Buybacks. Airdrop for #SPX6900 holders This is how new 100x runners are born Only true believers will be left for the run to millions Mark my words...

ᴛʀᴀᴄᴇʀ

46,226 次观看 • 1 个月前