Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Another year, another incredible record-breaking Men’s Final Four Breakfast. ☕️✡️ It was truly amazing to be surrounded by nearly 400 Jewish & non-Jewish coaches, administrators, friends, allies, & many more this past weekend in Indy. #JCA | #JewishCoaches | #JCAB2026

26,661 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

On this day in 1943, in the midst of the Holocaust, the U.S. military high command in North Africa slammed the door on Jewish refugees — explicitly refusing to let the Allies set up safe camps because it “might alienate local Arabs.” Tunisia was home to one of the oldest continuous Jewish communities in the world — more than 2,000 years old. In 1943, roughly 85,000–100,000 Jews lived there, many in ancient communities like Djerba and Tunis. Today, only a fragile remnant of about 1,000 remains — the vast majority driven out in the years after 1948 amid rising persecution and state pressure. The Holocaust was not confined to Europe. The Nazis brought their murderous anti-Jewish policies to North Africa. After Vichy France — the collaborationist regime that eagerly enforced Nazi-style anti-Jewish laws — handed Tunisia over in November 1942, German forces occupied the country for six brutal months. They established at least 27 forced-labor and internment camps, rounding up some 5,000 Jewish men. Hundreds died from starvation, disease, beatings, and execution. Vichy officials actively collaborated in the persecution, keeping their anti-Jewish statutes in force even after the Allies arrived. And it wasn’t only the Nazis and French. As these Tunisian Jewish survivors recount in the attached clip, many local Arab neighbors turned on them — looting homes, informing on Jews, and joining in the violence when the Germans gave the signal. While American and British troops were still battling Rommel’s remnants in Tunisia, desperate Jewish families — fleeing Vichy persecution, forced-labor camps, and the shadow of the Final Solution — looked to the newly liberated coastline as their last hope. Proposals had reached Eisenhower’s headquarters for temporary refugee depots in North Africa, far from the fighting. The logic was simple: room existed, ships could deliver them, and lives could be saved. The American general staff said no. In a cable dated April 26, 1943, Admiral William D. Leahy conveyed the War Department’s firm position to Secretary of State Cordell Hull: no camps. The fear? Arab resentment could destabilize supply lines and complicate the campaign. Better to keep the locals calm than to shelter Jews. The timing could not have been more damning. That same week, the Bermuda Conference was underway — the Allies’ much-publicized meeting to “solve” the refugee crisis. It ended in the same paralysis: fine words, zero action. North Africa would not become a haven. So what happened to those Jews left waiting? The Vichy anti-Jewish laws stayed in force under Allied oversight for months longer. Jewish men and boys remained in brutal Sahara labor camps (some until summer 1943). European Jews trying to reach safety by sea or overland were turned back or left stranded. Thousands who might have been extracted died instead in the death camps of Europe as the crematoria ran at full capacity. The Allied refusal ensured no emergency bolt-hole existed for others. It was a quiet, bureaucratic death sentence — delivered not by Nazis, but by the very commanders fighting them. The episode exposed a brutal truth the Allies never fully admitted: when push came to shove, Arab goodwill mattered more than Jewish lives. That is precisely why Jewish sovereignty changed everything. Israel does not ask permission from hostile neighbors to save its people. It does not weigh military convenience against Jewish survival. It acts. Never again will we be entirely dependent on the goodwill of others.

Captain Allen

25,901 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

I watched the full Louis Theroux documentary on the settler movement. I wanted to point out at least one historical inaccuracy that I spotted when he speaks about Hebron. He states: “In 1968, the year after it was occupied by Israel, a community of Jewish settlers moved in illegally. They now number some 700.” In 1895 the Jewish population of Hebron was 1,429. So there were more Jews in Hebron some 130 years ago than there are Jews in Hebron today. Why does Louis neglect to mention this? He interviews a Palestinian human rights activist named Issa. This man states: “This is my land. The settlers chose to come here. And if it’s not safe for them, why continue to build more settlements in my own city?” But let’s step back for a second. Why is it that the Jewish population of Hebron is smaller today than it was 130 years ago? Jews have lived in Hebron since antiquity. Biblical tradition holds that Abraham settled in Hebron and purchased the Cave of the Patriarchs as a burial place for his wife Sarah. Modern Jewish history in Hebron dates back to at least the 15th century. A visiting rabbi found at least 20 Jewish families living in Hebron in 1521. This small Jewish community grew over the years despite facing brutal discrimination and recurring pogroms. They were banned from praying at the Cave of the Patriarchs - one of the holiest sites in Judaism - until the beginning of the 20th century. The Jewish community of Hebron was only effectively finally destroyed in 1929 as a result of the Hebron Massacre. Dozens of Jews - including non-Zionist Jews who had lived in Hebron for generations - were systematically murdered by Arab nationalists. The British then ordered the remaining Jews to leave the city. Jewish properties and homes were looted. The Hadassah building became an Arab girls' school, the Abraham Avinu synagogue was destroyed and used as a goat pen, and the Jewish cemetery was vandalized and desecrated. When Jordan occupied Hebron from 1948 to 1967, they razed the last remaining Jewish synagogues and strictly prohibited Jewish access to the city. The Tomb of the Patriarchs was once again off limits to the Jews. Following Israel’s victory in the 1967 Six Day War, Jews were finally able to reenter the city and visit the Tomb of the Patriarchs. Louis Theroux only picks up the story here, when settlers “illegally” moved in. I want to clarify that I oppose extremist settlers in the West Bank. But if the Jews are to live anywhere in the West Bank, surely there can be a community in Hebron? I mean, how is it fair that a 500 year old Jewish community gets massacred and expelled and their homes looted and when they move back in 30 years later it’s “illegal.”

Drew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼

538,380 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Yesterday’s terror attack on Sydney’s Jewish community and on all Australians is a day that will be forever burned in the nation’s soul. This was the darkest day Australia has faced since the Port Arthur Massacre in April 1996. Bondi Beach is a symbol of Australia. These murders are a desecration against us all. I acknowledge the swift and courageous response of New South Wales Police and paramedics, whose immediate action helped secure the scene, protect lives and support those caught up in this horrific attack. I particularly recognise those who stepped into danger to help save lives, disarm the terrorists, and render first aid to the wounded. We have all seen video footage of brave civilians, charging into danger in an effort to save lives. They are heroes. I share the nation’s revulsion and horror as we continue listening to the sorrow and heartbreak in the testimonials we are hearing. Many Australians are feeling a growing sense of bewilderment. There is palpable anger. And I share that anger. Because Antisemitism in Australia has been left to fester. Many of us who have been close to Jewish Australians for the last two years, as I have, heard story after story of hideous antisemitism. We have seen a clear failure of leadership to keep Australians safe, especially our Jewish community. We have a government that has seen antisemitism as a problem to be managed instead of evil which must be eradicated. Everything must change from today in how governments respond. Criminal acts have been perpetrated, repeatedly and very publicly. We have seen public landmarks turned into symbols of antisemitic hate. We have seen campuses occupied and Jewish students ostracised. We have seen the homes of Jewish Australians vandalised. We have seen Jewish childcare centres targeted. We have seen synagogues firebombed – orchestrated by foreign terrorist states. Every single day for the past two years, the lives of Jewish Australians have been made harder because the tide of antisemitism has been rising. The armed guards greeting four-year-olds on the way into kindergarten. The mothers who read hateful and threatening posts online and decided to keep their child home from school. University students having to put up with chants like ‘from the ‘river to the sea’. Let’s be clear. This chant calls for the explicit elimination of the Jewish State. Universities did not deal with this properly. Jewish Australians who told me they were returning to Israel because they felt safer there than here. In February this year, ASIO Director General Mike Burgess warned antisemitism was the biggest threat to loss of life in Australia. The Prime Minister has told Jewish Australians he will do whatever it takes to deal with antisemitism. He must start by committing today to implementing his own Antisemitism Envoy’s report in full.

Sussan Ley

21,897 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

"Was it worth it to rebel?.. They fought for national pride... to be free, to be independent... for the right to live here, in our land... In my opinion, it was all worth it" In a spectacular display of zero self-awareness, tour guide and IDF terrorist Naftali Chen crouches in a cave in the West Bank, which he imagines to be part of a tunnel system originating in the 2nd century's Bar Kochba Jewish revolt against the Roman occupation of the land, and asks if it was worth it. The devastating consequences of the rebels' defeat, according to traditional belief, included the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Jews, the extensive forced displacement of Jewish survivors, the annihilation of a thousand Jewish villages and towns, and more. He describes how the rebels fought from within tunnels, and suggests that this very tunnel was built beneath a mikveh as part of the revolt. Tunnels under a civilian facility? Hmm, interesting. Cohen concludes that yes, it was all worth it to be a free nation living in its own land. But he is, of course, too blind to see that he and his so-called "nation" are the modern-day Roman occupier. Cohen is part of the "For Judea" (or "On the Judean Trail") project, an "educational" initiative operated by the army (which also produced this clip), with the cooperation of many other official state bodies, established to promote Israeli tourism in the West Bank. This video was filmed during an archeological excavation, illegal according to international law, taking place at Khirbet Al-Rabiya - which he calls "Khirbet Arab", because Israelis never bother pronouncing non-Hebrew names properly. It never fails to amaze me how 99.9% of Zionists who claim to be interested in history have zero regard for - and often zero knowledge of - thousands of years of non-Jewish history in Palestine. As some older Israeli guy once told me: "When we were kids, they used to say that this land has history that is more than two thousand years old or less than a hundred years old."

B.M.

21,714 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten