Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Ansem explains the problem with the trenches and how to fix it "Everybody's been trading these $10K market cap coins and not holding anything. The average hold time has been like 30 seconds" "The way you actually make money during bull markets is holding things for an extended period...

MarketBubble's profile picture

Market Bubble

92,860 subscribers

30,872 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & TechnologieFinanzen
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

there is a reason why coins on BASE and BNB run WAY harder than they would on Solana, and it comes down to the culture and the way people trade "on Base and BNB traders will hold longer than people usually do on Solana. on SOL everyone is wired to only buying $10K marketcap coins and there are less people who want to bid coins over $100K on SOL than there are on Base and BNB" if you're trading the memecoin market, join Kanto Labs
1:41

there is a reason why coins on BASE and BNB run WAY harder than they would on Solana, and it comes down to the culture and the way people trade "on Base and BNB traders will hold longer than people usually do on Solana. on SOL everyone is wired to only buying $10K marketcap coins and there are less people who want to bid coins over $100K on SOL than there are on Base and BNB" if you're trading the memecoin market, join Kanto Labs

Ash Robin

58,094 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

there's a ton of coins onchain that are going to do well in this bull market if solana recovers and does well, you don't need to be in and out of coins every 30 seconds
0:35

there's a ton of coins onchain that are going to do well in this bull market if solana recovers and does well, you don't need to be in and out of coins every 30 seconds

Ansem 🐂🀄️

295,935 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen

Threadguy explains why he’s bullish on streamer coins “Crypto people want to buy crypto coins. There are a lot of mainstream people who launched a coin, but none of them come close to Mitch” “The people with the money are crypto people.
1:16

Threadguy explains why he’s bullish on streamer coins “Crypto people want to buy crypto coins. There are a lot of mainstream people who launched a coin, but none of them come close to Mitch” “The people with the money are crypto people.

Mikli

51,252 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

3 Crypto Coins That Could Actually 100X?! (Huge Potential) 👀💥 Three crypto coins that could actually 100X in the next bull market. And you certainly not going to expect the last one. Your first coin is Quant. Your second Altcoin is Xen. Your third token is “Games for a Living.” Will you buy some of these coins? Let me know in the comments! 🤔
0:42

3 Crypto Coins That Could Actually 100X?! (Huge Potential) 👀💥 Three crypto coins that could actually 100X in the next bull market. And you certainly not going to expect the last one. Your first coin is Quant. Your second Altcoin is Xen. Your third token is “Games for a Living.” Will you buy some of these coins? Let me know in the comments! 🤔

.

18,058 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

Bill Ackman, CEO of Pershing Square Capital Management, on how short selling actually works, explained so simply that anyone can understand it: Most people know how to make money when something goes up in value. Buy low, sell high. Simple. But making money when something falls? That's where most people get lost. Bill Ackman breaks it down with a simple analogy: "Imagine for a moment that a friend of yours collects rare coins and you have the view that those coins are going to go down in value." Here's how it works: You call your friend and ask to borrow a few of his coins. He agrees. You then sell those borrowed coins in the market for $1,000 each. Then you wait. Your prediction turns out to be correct. The coins drop in value to $500. You go back into the market, buy them back at the lower price, and return them to your friend. The math is straightforward, as Bill Ackman explains: "You've sold them for $1,000. You've repurchased them for $500. You've made $500 on each coin." Your friend gets his coins back exactly as they were. And because he loaned them to you, he also earns an interest payment in the process. "He's happy because he's made interest lending you the coins. You've made money profiting from the decline in the value of the coins. And that's short selling." Borrow. Sell high. Buy back low. Return. Pocket the difference. That's the entire mechanics of short selling, stripped of all the Wall Street jargon and explained through a coin collection.
0:59

Bill Ackman, CEO of Pershing Square Capital Management, on how short selling actually works, explained so simply that anyone can understand it: Most people know how to make money when something goes up in value. Buy low, sell high. Simple. But making money when something falls? That's where most people get lost. Bill Ackman breaks it down with a simple analogy: "Imagine for a moment that a friend of yours collects rare coins and you have the view that those coins are going to go down in value." Here's how it works: You call your friend and ask to borrow a few of his coins. He agrees. You then sell those borrowed coins in the market for $1,000 each. Then you wait. Your prediction turns out to be correct. The coins drop in value to $500. You go back into the market, buy them back at the lower price, and return them to your friend. The math is straightforward, as Bill Ackman explains: "You've sold them for $1,000. You've repurchased them for $500. You've made $500 on each coin." Your friend gets his coins back exactly as they were. And because he loaned them to you, he also earns an interest payment in the process. "He's happy because he's made interest lending you the coins. You've made money profiting from the decline in the value of the coins. And that's short selling." Borrow. Sell high. Buy back low. Return. Pocket the difference. That's the entire mechanics of short selling, stripped of all the Wall Street jargon and explained through a coin collection.

Big Brain Business

39,834 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Threadguy explains why Solana is uninteresting to him here "I don't get the SOL narrative from here. It looks good, but like why? What would take Solana back to an all time high? You would need euphoria bigger than TRUMP coin. You would need apps that are actually doing something interesting and making a fuck ton of money." "We know what the top of meme coins is. Top of meme coins is $297 per Solana token. That's the top of meme coins. So you need something bigger than that to theoretically send Solana higher. I don't necessarily know that you get it or what it would take to get it. So I remain uninterested in Solana."
0:47

Threadguy explains why Solana is uninteresting to him here "I don't get the SOL narrative from here. It looks good, but like why? What would take Solana back to an all time high? You would need euphoria bigger than TRUMP coin. You would need apps that are actually doing something interesting and making a fuck ton of money." "We know what the top of meme coins is. Top of meme coins is $297 per Solana token. That's the top of meme coins. So you need something bigger than that to theoretically send Solana higher. I don't necessarily know that you get it or what it would take to get it. So I remain uninterested in Solana."

Kai

24,765 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

I made $30,000+ over the past 3 weeks trading memecoins and I only bought coins above 1 million marketcap 🧑‍🍳 you don't HAVE to trench to make money in this market here's how I look for mid-large cap coins to scalp and my thoughts on how I look for ways to make money onchain ⬇️
12:14

I made $30,000+ over the past 3 weeks trading memecoins and I only bought coins above 1 million marketcap 🧑‍🍳 you don't HAVE to trench to make money in this market here's how I look for mid-large cap coins to scalp and my thoughts on how I look for ways to make money onchain ⬇️

Ash Robin

37,503 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Imagine playing a game where the stakes keep rising, but most of the pieces are worthless. That’s what every crypto cycle feels like. A high-stakes game of hot potato. Most coins have no real value, so when a new trend pops off, people just reprice the new garbage to match the old garbage that was already overhyped. The goal is to ride the wave of hype without being left holding any of the worthless coins when the noise stops. But how long does hype really last? A better approach is to focus on movement memecoins that actually have a purpose. Projects with goals that go beyond just making money. These are backed by communities that want to improve the crypto space and create something meaningful. Only memecoins with real missions and strong communities have the chance to outlast the hype. All the other nonsense is here one moment and disappears in the blink of an eye. If you’re underexposed or not exposed to #SPX6900 $SPX, I sincerely feel bad for you. Stop trading and believe in something #FlipTheStockMarket
1:54

Imagine playing a game where the stakes keep rising, but most of the pieces are worthless. That’s what every crypto cycle feels like. A high-stakes game of hot potato. Most coins have no real value, so when a new trend pops off, people just reprice the new garbage to match the old garbage that was already overhyped. The goal is to ride the wave of hype without being left holding any of the worthless coins when the noise stops. But how long does hype really last? A better approach is to focus on movement memecoins that actually have a purpose. Projects with goals that go beyond just making money. These are backed by communities that want to improve the crypto space and create something meaningful. Only memecoins with real missions and strong communities have the chance to outlast the hype. All the other nonsense is here one moment and disappears in the blink of an eye. If you’re underexposed or not exposed to #SPX6900 $SPX, I sincerely feel bad for you. Stop trading and believe in something #FlipTheStockMarket

No One Actually 💹🧲

54,557 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Lebron on what it takes to play for as long as he has at a high level that the average fan may not understand: "It starts way before you get on the floor. They see us once the game is going the popcorn's been popped and the lights are brighter. It takes so much more like sacrifice and discipline and things over the course if you want to be really great at this and if you want to do it for a long period of time. It's so many hours that you got to commit to it. There's so many things that you maybe want to do that you can't if you want to be great but everybody's journey is different. I'm just speaking from my journey but I do think that the game gives back to the ones who put the time in and commit to the game. That's just the game God's rewarding and we don't cheat the process"
0:54

Lebron on what it takes to play for as long as he has at a high level that the average fan may not understand: "It starts way before you get on the floor. They see us once the game is going the popcorn's been popped and the lights are brighter. It takes so much more like sacrifice and discipline and things over the course if you want to be really great at this and if you want to do it for a long period of time. It's so many hours that you got to commit to it. There's so many things that you maybe want to do that you can't if you want to be great but everybody's journey is different. I'm just speaking from my journey but I do think that the game gives back to the ones who put the time in and commit to the game. That's just the game God's rewarding and we don't cheat the process"

Oh No He Didn't

36,740 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

I have a friend who doesn't read anything published in the past 50 years, and the more I think about it, the more I think he's onto something. The reason is that time is the best filter we have for quality. People are bad at judging quality in the moment but very good at getting rid of junk over time. — — "History is not very good at capturing all that is great in art. It is not good at that. There are many great symphonies that have been lost permanently, there are many great painters that died unknown and their paintings are gone, there's novels that have been written that no one will ever read. So history is not good at capturing all this great art. But history is very good at discarding all that is mediocre. And the amount of time that that takes, it's something like 50 years. So over the course of 50 years, what will happen is a lot of stuff that was prominent will be re-filtered and re-filtered and re-filtered, and you'll end up with a smaller group of things which have survived that test of time. So if you think about it right now, if you go back and look at the bestseller lists for 1974, 1973, there's a lot of that that would have been highly regarded at the time, which people do not read anymore for a variety of reasons, and there's some that has survived, and that's a very telling distinction. So in a world where I'm turning 60 this year, you have a limited amount of time, all four of us have active lives, we want to make sure that if we're going to sit down, we're going to read carefully, we're going to meet and we're going to discuss it in detail, we want to make sure that the work is rewarding. And the best way to ensure that is by drawing from the past." amor towles
1:31

I have a friend who doesn't read anything published in the past 50 years, and the more I think about it, the more I think he's onto something. The reason is that time is the best filter we have for quality. People are bad at judging quality in the moment but very good at getting rid of junk over time. — — "History is not very good at capturing all that is great in art. It is not good at that. There are many great symphonies that have been lost permanently, there are many great painters that died unknown and their paintings are gone, there's novels that have been written that no one will ever read. So history is not good at capturing all this great art. But history is very good at discarding all that is mediocre. And the amount of time that that takes, it's something like 50 years. So over the course of 50 years, what will happen is a lot of stuff that was prominent will be re-filtered and re-filtered and re-filtered, and you'll end up with a smaller group of things which have survived that test of time. So if you think about it right now, if you go back and look at the bestseller lists for 1974, 1973, there's a lot of that that would have been highly regarded at the time, which people do not read anymore for a variety of reasons, and there's some that has survived, and that's a very telling distinction. So in a world where I'm turning 60 this year, you have a limited amount of time, all four of us have active lives, we want to make sure that if we're going to sit down, we're going to read carefully, we're going to meet and we're going to discuss it in detail, we want to make sure that the work is rewarding. And the best way to ensure that is by drawing from the past." amor towles

David Perell

86,741 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Matt Damon participated in Howard Zinn's great "The People Speak" series, and read out a great speech by Zinn about the importance of civil disobedience, which is as apt today as when he first wrote it in 1970: "I start from the supposition that the world is topsy-turvy, that things are all wrong, that the wrong people are in jail, and the wrong people are out of jail. That the wrong people are in power, and the wrong people are out of power. I start from the supposition that all we have to do is think about the state of the world today, and realize that things are all upside down. If you don't think, if you listen to TV, read scholarly things, you actually begin to think that things are not so bad. Or that just little things are wrong. But you have to get a little detached, and then come back and look at the world, and you are horrified. So we have to start from that supposition—that things are really topsy-turvy. And our topic is topsy-turvy: civil disobedience. As soon as you say the topic is civil disobedience, you are saying our problem is civil disobedience. That is not our problem…. Our problem is civil obedience. Our problem is the numbers of people all over the world who have obeyed the dictates of the leaders of their government and have gone to war, and millions have been killed because of this obedience. And our problem is that scene in All Quiet on the Western Front where the schoolboys march off dutifully in a line to war. Our problem is that people are obedient all over the world, in the face of poverty and starvation and stupidity, and war and cruelty. Our problem is that people are obedient while the jails are full of petty thieves, and all the while the grand thieves are running the country. That’s our problem."
5:05

Matt Damon participated in Howard Zinn's great "The People Speak" series, and read out a great speech by Zinn about the importance of civil disobedience, which is as apt today as when he first wrote it in 1970: "I start from the supposition that the world is topsy-turvy, that things are all wrong, that the wrong people are in jail, and the wrong people are out of jail. That the wrong people are in power, and the wrong people are out of power. I start from the supposition that all we have to do is think about the state of the world today, and realize that things are all upside down. If you don't think, if you listen to TV, read scholarly things, you actually begin to think that things are not so bad. Or that just little things are wrong. But you have to get a little detached, and then come back and look at the world, and you are horrified. So we have to start from that supposition—that things are really topsy-turvy. And our topic is topsy-turvy: civil disobedience. As soon as you say the topic is civil disobedience, you are saying our problem is civil disobedience. That is not our problem…. Our problem is civil obedience. Our problem is the numbers of people all over the world who have obeyed the dictates of the leaders of their government and have gone to war, and millions have been killed because of this obedience. And our problem is that scene in All Quiet on the Western Front where the schoolboys march off dutifully in a line to war. Our problem is that people are obedient all over the world, in the face of poverty and starvation and stupidity, and war and cruelty. Our problem is that people are obedient while the jails are full of petty thieves, and all the while the grand thieves are running the country. That’s our problem."

☀️👀

297,607 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Qullamaggie on To Make a Lot of Money, You Need to be in the Best Stocks “LVGO and FSLY are the two best stocks right now. I’m long those; this is why you focus on momentum leaders. You’re not going to get any big moves in this. Random stocks like ZNGA—someone mentioned it yesterday— and this GLUE and stuff like that. These are some random stocks that are just having breakouts. You need to focus on the momentum leaders that you really need to be in. If you want to make a lot of money, you need to be in the best stocks. You can’t trade these random pieces of sh*t stocks that you guys trade, or a lot of you, I know.”
0:34

Qullamaggie on To Make a Lot of Money, You Need to be in the Best Stocks “LVGO and FSLY are the two best stocks right now. I’m long those; this is why you focus on momentum leaders. You’re not going to get any big moves in this. Random stocks like ZNGA—someone mentioned it yesterday— and this GLUE and stuff like that. These are some random stocks that are just having breakouts. You need to focus on the momentum leaders that you really need to be in. If you want to make a lot of money, you need to be in the best stocks. You can’t trade these random pieces of sh*t stocks that you guys trade, or a lot of you, I know.”

Lone

15,828 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

The truth came out DC Lobbyist Desirée Townsend spoke with Congress Reps. The REAL REASON Democrats are fighting for illegal’s healthcare is because states like California have so many illegals their entire healthcare system runs on the taxpayer money for illegals “Let's take California, for example. California has a high demographic of individuals that are not here legally, and prior to the expansion of healthcare for them, the hospitals were inundated with people they could not handle. And so, when that expansion happened and immigrants who are here, undocumented immigrants that are here were able to get insurance, all of a sudden, you then had this new kind of revenue stream that came in not only to the hospitals but now to all these doctors and providers in California. — California will be a catastrophe because you'll have all of these individuals now that are not documented with no health insurance. So, all of the providers that were making money off of this kind of, like, new economics in California are- are now not gonna be making any money. And instead, these individuals that are undocumented are gonna have to go to the hospital for treatment, and that's going to, instead of make the hospital money because they're covered by Medicaid, it's going to create a situation where now the hospitals are losing millions of dollars. So, that is what I believe the sticking point is with Medicaid with Democrats. It has to do with a situation in states like California where you have millions and millions of undocumented individuals, um, and if they lose insurance, not only will the providers now not make money and the hospitals are not making money”
3:01

The truth came out DC Lobbyist Desirée Townsend spoke with Congress Reps. The REAL REASON Democrats are fighting for illegal’s healthcare is because states like California have so many illegals their entire healthcare system runs on the taxpayer money for illegals “Let's take California, for example. California has a high demographic of individuals that are not here legally, and prior to the expansion of healthcare for them, the hospitals were inundated with people they could not handle. And so, when that expansion happened and immigrants who are here, undocumented immigrants that are here were able to get insurance, all of a sudden, you then had this new kind of revenue stream that came in not only to the hospitals but now to all these doctors and providers in California. — California will be a catastrophe because you'll have all of these individuals now that are not documented with no health insurance. So, all of the providers that were making money off of this kind of, like, new economics in California are- are now not gonna be making any money. And instead, these individuals that are undocumented are gonna have to go to the hospital for treatment, and that's going to, instead of make the hospital money because they're covered by Medicaid, it's going to create a situation where now the hospitals are losing millions of dollars. So, that is what I believe the sticking point is with Medicaid with Democrats. It has to do with a situation in states like California where you have millions and millions of undocumented individuals, um, and if they lose insurance, not only will the providers now not make money and the hospitals are not making money”

Wall Street Apes

1,058,783 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

I Actually Want the Crypto Market to Crash, Here’s Why Everyone is praying for crypto to pump. I'm hoping for the exact opposite, and here's why. People are waiting for the CLARITY Act to pass and the Fed to cut rates so crypto explodes. I want it delayed. Keep the market down a little longer. Here's why that sounds crazy but isn't. When the market is down is exactly when you get to accumulate at cheap prices. You don't walk into a store hoping the price is high. If you want a quality product, you want it cheap. Assets are no different. But in investing people flip it. They want their bags expensive while they're still trying to buy more. That's trading with your emotions, way too attached to your portfolio. If you truly believed in your investments, you'd want what I want: more money into cheaper assets. That's how this actually works, not the other way around. Flip your perspective and you make money. Stay emotional, blame everyone else, and you stay exactly where you are. Follow for more.
1:45

I Actually Want the Crypto Market to Crash, Here’s Why Everyone is praying for crypto to pump. I'm hoping for the exact opposite, and here's why. People are waiting for the CLARITY Act to pass and the Fed to cut rates so crypto explodes. I want it delayed. Keep the market down a little longer. Here's why that sounds crazy but isn't. When the market is down is exactly when you get to accumulate at cheap prices. You don't walk into a store hoping the price is high. If you want a quality product, you want it cheap. Assets are no different. But in investing people flip it. They want their bags expensive while they're still trying to buy more. That's trading with your emotions, way too attached to your portfolio. If you truly believed in your investments, you'd want what I want: more money into cheaper assets. That's how this actually works, not the other way around. Flip your perspective and you make money. Stay emotional, blame everyone else, and you stay exactly where you are. Follow for more.

Alexander Lorenzo

13,246 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

The ENTIRE crypto market is at ZERO and all of you are now BROKE. Stop lying to each other and scamming your friends on memecoins.. it’s time to make the transition over to making gambling a business for yourself. If you onboarded people into crypto, tell them to leave and onboard them into gambling, they have WAY HIGHER chances on making money (FACT). No more jerk circles and taking advise from people who have no results. Anyone hating in the comments is just scamming their friends to buy their stupid coins.
0:34

The ENTIRE crypto market is at ZERO and all of you are now BROKE. Stop lying to each other and scamming your friends on memecoins.. it’s time to make the transition over to making gambling a business for yourself. If you onboarded people into crypto, tell them to leave and onboard them into gambling, they have WAY HIGHER chances on making money (FACT). No more jerk circles and taking advise from people who have no results. Anyone hating in the comments is just scamming their friends to buy their stupid coins.

Ameer Hussain

20,580 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Had a great chat with jesse.base.eth of Base about content coins Takeaways: Not totally sold on the idea that content coins are different and distinct from memecoins. I think memecoins are a type of "content coins" - Memes are content - The mechanics Jesse describes as unique to ccs, are what I think also happens in memecoins --> some buyers are there to collect, to support, for the lolz, others are there to speculate. What's different and interesting about this reframing is - Content coins can be more than memes, they can be a tweet, a picture, a podcast, whatever content. Maybe we can start changing the way we interact with content online so that liking or double-tapping turns into buying (even if it's just for pennies). This will allow creators to better monetize their content, and fans to have a chance of sharing the upside if the token takes off / becomes viral. Finally People crying because "base is for everyone" coin crashed have a point, the Base tweet was ambiguous about what the token was about BUT You're mad because you blindly aped and the token dropped, and such is life in crypto. Only a little bit of digging would have shown it was a content coin on Zora.
5:02

Had a great chat with jesse.base.eth of Base about content coins Takeaways: Not totally sold on the idea that content coins are different and distinct from memecoins. I think memecoins are a type of "content coins" - Memes are content - The mechanics Jesse describes as unique to ccs, are what I think also happens in memecoins --> some buyers are there to collect, to support, for the lolz, others are there to speculate. What's different and interesting about this reframing is - Content coins can be more than memes, they can be a tweet, a picture, a podcast, whatever content. Maybe we can start changing the way we interact with content online so that liking or double-tapping turns into buying (even if it's just for pennies). This will allow creators to better monetize their content, and fans to have a chance of sharing the upside if the token takes off / becomes viral. Finally People crying because "base is for everyone" coin crashed have a point, the Base tweet was ambiguous about what the token was about BUT You're mad because you blindly aped and the token dropped, and such is life in crypto. Only a little bit of digging would have shown it was a content coin on Zora.

Camila Russo

19,872 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Post Fiat founder goodalexander says the Bitcoin thesis is getting weaker by the day. "You have privacy coins accelerating in terms of their adoption. The European Union and other countries tried to kill Monero, but they weren't successful." "The Tornado Cash rulings in the US have given clarity to coins like Railgun, which are smaller, but are good tech." "And Bitcoin is fundamentally not private." "It also has the unfortunate leverage concentration from Michael Saylor, who has issued a lot of preferred and complex convertible financial instruments on top of it. Which have concentrated the ownership and liquidity profile. And is now driving a market downturn." "Unfortunately, it's hard to see that structurally reversing."
1:11

Post Fiat founder goodalexander says the Bitcoin thesis is getting weaker by the day. "You have privacy coins accelerating in terms of their adoption. The European Union and other countries tried to kill Monero, but they weren't successful." "The Tornado Cash rulings in the US have given clarity to coins like Railgun, which are smaller, but are good tech." "And Bitcoin is fundamentally not private." "It also has the unfortunate leverage concentration from Michael Saylor, who has issued a lot of preferred and complex convertible financial instruments on top of it. Which have concentrated the ownership and liquidity profile. And is now driving a market downturn." "Unfortunately, it's hard to see that structurally reversing."

TBPN

13,406 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

At the BNB Chain hackathon, CZ 🔶 BNB made several very important points about AI trading (Everything in parentheses is my own view and judgment.) He first said that AI will be involved in trading everywhere. Trading itself is already a huge market: there are 300 million users on Binance alone, and if you add the decentralized ecosystems, that number is not small either. In such a mass-market environment, many different trading strategies can work, with countless different coins, different projects, and different ways to play. But there is a big problem here: building commercial AI trading platforms for retail users is actually very hard. If a trading strategy works very well for one person, once a billion people start using the same strategy, that strategy “might still work, or might stop working.” Take copy trading / follow trading as an example: if you buy first and everyone follows you, the first buyer will perform very well, but the last person to follow may not end up with good results. So, with the exact same strategy and the exact same copy logic, the outcomes can be completely different for different people. (On top of that, every strategy also has its own capital capacity limits.) Teams that can really build strong AI are, with high probability, going to trade with their own money. In today’s world, money itself is already somewhat like a “commodity”; many people have a lot of capital, and it’s actually not that hard to raise funds. If you truly have an algorithm that can make a lot of money, it’s not hard to get money and run your own book. There is really only one situation where you would sell this algorithm to mass-market users: for example, if you charge a $10 monthly subscription and can sell it to one million users, then your $10 million monthly subscription revenue is higher than the profit you could make by trading the strategy yourself. (Here this touches one of our earlier theses: as training AI models becomes relatively easier and the supply of models increases, model companies have more incentive to open-source. By analogy, as the production process of trading strategies is increasingly simplified by AI and the supply of strategies explodes, traders will have stronger incentives to monetize by expanding their influence in other words, by “open-sourcing” their strategies.) Of course, CZ did not say that this model can never work. Another path is to build an AI trading platform that lets users tune different AI algorithms, or very easily assemble their own structures and strategies, so that what each person ends up running is different and better tailored to themselves. Some people will make money, some people will lose money, but the platform still has value because it’s very hard for most people to build an AI trading algorithm from scratch. So there are a lot of trade-offs here; it’s not as simple as saying “once AI shows up, everything automatically gets better.” (This is exactly what we presented at the hackathon: you describe your own strategy in natural language, and the AI automatically generates a workflow. The parameters in that workflow, the models used, the logical structure, the APIs it calls, and even the algorithms it invokes are all customizable. The reasons we think workflows are a good way to do this include: controllable execution paths, Lego-like modular nodes, and better visualization that makes it easier for users to build and adjust their workflows.) Finally, his conclusion was very clear: it’s not that AI will definitely make trading better, and it’s not that AI will definitely make things worse. Rather, no matter what, in the future a huge number of people will use AI to trade. This will be a very large field, and whoever can build the best algorithms will make a lot of money.
2:38

At the BNB Chain hackathon, CZ 🔶 BNB made several very important points about AI trading (Everything in parentheses is my own view and judgment.) He first said that AI will be involved in trading everywhere. Trading itself is already a huge market: there are 300 million users on Binance alone, and if you add the decentralized ecosystems, that number is not small either. In such a mass-market environment, many different trading strategies can work, with countless different coins, different projects, and different ways to play. But there is a big problem here: building commercial AI trading platforms for retail users is actually very hard. If a trading strategy works very well for one person, once a billion people start using the same strategy, that strategy “might still work, or might stop working.” Take copy trading / follow trading as an example: if you buy first and everyone follows you, the first buyer will perform very well, but the last person to follow may not end up with good results. So, with the exact same strategy and the exact same copy logic, the outcomes can be completely different for different people. (On top of that, every strategy also has its own capital capacity limits.) Teams that can really build strong AI are, with high probability, going to trade with their own money. In today’s world, money itself is already somewhat like a “commodity”; many people have a lot of capital, and it’s actually not that hard to raise funds. If you truly have an algorithm that can make a lot of money, it’s not hard to get money and run your own book. There is really only one situation where you would sell this algorithm to mass-market users: for example, if you charge a $10 monthly subscription and can sell it to one million users, then your $10 million monthly subscription revenue is higher than the profit you could make by trading the strategy yourself. (Here this touches one of our earlier theses: as training AI models becomes relatively easier and the supply of models increases, model companies have more incentive to open-source. By analogy, as the production process of trading strategies is increasingly simplified by AI and the supply of strategies explodes, traders will have stronger incentives to monetize by expanding their influence in other words, by “open-sourcing” their strategies.) Of course, CZ did not say that this model can never work. Another path is to build an AI trading platform that lets users tune different AI algorithms, or very easily assemble their own structures and strategies, so that what each person ends up running is different and better tailored to themselves. Some people will make money, some people will lose money, but the platform still has value because it’s very hard for most people to build an AI trading algorithm from scratch. So there are a lot of trade-offs here; it’s not as simple as saying “once AI shows up, everything automatically gets better.” (This is exactly what we presented at the hackathon: you describe your own strategy in natural language, and the AI automatically generates a workflow. The parameters in that workflow, the models used, the logical structure, the APIs it calls, and even the algorithms it invokes are all customizable. The reasons we think workflows are a good way to do this include: controllable execution paths, Lego-like modular nodes, and better visualization that makes it easier for users to build and adjust their workflows.) Finally, his conclusion was very clear: it’s not that AI will definitely make trading better, and it’s not that AI will definitely make things worse. Rather, no matter what, in the future a huge number of people will use AI to trade. This will be a very large field, and whoever can build the best algorithms will make a lot of money.

Tykoo

25,535 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

if you missed $ASTER, $CARDS, and streamer coins on $PUMP you have to realize the market is evolving "people are tired of PVP so whales are just waiting for good narratives to come up every few weeks and they are sizing into them instead of getting rinsed in the trenches" if you're looking for a place to trade, join Kanto Labs
2:59

if you missed $ASTER, $CARDS, and streamer coins on $PUMP you have to realize the market is evolving "people are tired of PVP so whales are just waiting for good narratives to come up every few weeks and they are sizing into them instead of getting rinsed in the trenches" if you're looking for a place to trade, join Kanto Labs

AshRobin 🐶

58,181 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Elon Musk: The real hard problem is to improve products while making them more affordable at the same time. “If you have a compelling product and it is affordable, so the value for money is good, and people have enough money to buy it, then demand is never going to be an issue. So, that is not something I worry about. I do worry about making sure that we can achieve affordability thresholds. Because even if you make the value for money infinite, if people do not have enough money to buy it, then it's just frustrating for people. They see this great product, too expensive, can't buy it. So, making the car affordable while continuing to improve the capabilities and quality of the product, that is the hardest problem.” Axel Springer Pioneer's Talk, December 1, 2020
0:45

Elon Musk: The real hard problem is to improve products while making them more affordable at the same time. “If you have a compelling product and it is affordable, so the value for money is good, and people have enough money to buy it, then demand is never going to be an issue. So, that is not something I worry about. I do worry about making sure that we can achieve affordability thresholds. Because even if you make the value for money infinite, if people do not have enough money to buy it, then it's just frustrating for people. They see this great product, too expensive, can't buy it. So, making the car affordable while continuing to improve the capabilities and quality of the product, that is the hardest problem.” Axel Springer Pioneer's Talk, December 1, 2020

ELON CLIPS

52,616 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten