正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Anthropic warns its latest AI model, which it's not yet releasing publicly, could enable hackers to attack every major operating system and web browser. New York Times' foreign affairs columnist Thomas Friedman breaks down the risks.

56,599 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

The Federal Reserve and the US Treasury just summoned Wall Street's most powerful CEOs to an emergency meeting. The reason: An AI model so dangerous they couldn't discuss it over the phone. This is the FIRST time the Treasury Secretary and Fed Chair jointly called bank CEOs into a room since October 13, 2008. That day, Paulson and Bernanke unveiled the $250 billion TARP bailout to stop the entire financial system from collapsing. This time it wasn't about banks failing. It was about an AI that can hack EVERY major operating system and web browser on earth. Here's what this means: Anthropic built a new AI model called Mythos. During internal testing, it found THOUSANDS of zero-day vulnerabilities across every major operating system and every major web browser on earth. Including a 27yo bug in OpenBSD, an operating system literally famous for being unhackable. And several vulnerabilities in the Linux kernel that could give an attacker complete control of any machine running it. Nobody asked it to do this. The capabilities were NOT trained. They literally just emerged as the model got smarter at coding and reasoning. Anthropic's researchers said they found more bugs in a few weeks with Mythos than they had found in their entire careers combined. On Tuesday, Bessent and Powell pulled the CEOs of Citi, Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Goldman Sachs into Treasury headquarters. The message: This AI exists, similar ones are coming, your banks need to be ready. But JPMorgan's Jamie Dimon didn't show up. Here's why that matters more than you think: JPMorgan is the ONLY bank that already has access to the model. They're one of 12 founding partners in Anthropic's "Project Glasswing" which gives select companies early access to Mythos to find and fix their own vulnerabilities before hackers get similar tools. So 5 bank CEOs managing $9 TRILLION in assets got called into a room to be warned about a threat. The one bank with the actual tools to defend against it? Their CEO skipped the meeting. The same day JPMorgan analysts issued buy ratings on CrowdStrike and Palo Alto Networks, citing Glasswing as the catalyst. One side of Wall Street got the warning. The other got the weapon AND the trading thesis. But here's the thing... The same AI that finds and fixes vulnerabilities can also EXPLOIT them. Anthropic admitted it directly. Mythos "can surpass all but the most skilled humans at finding and exploiting software vulnerabilities." In one test, it wrote a browser exploit chaining FOUR separate vulnerabilities, escaping both the renderer sandbox and the OS sandbox. Fully autonomous. Zero human involvement. Over 99% of the vulnerabilities it found haven't been patched yet. Meanwhile, Anthropic is fighting the Pentagon in court. The Defense Department labeled them a "supply-chain risk" after they refused to let their AI be used for autonomous targeting of US citizens. A San Francisco judge blocked the designation, calling the Pentagon's actions "disturbing." Then a DC appeals court reversed that protection. On the same day as the emergency bank meeting. One branch of government is treating Anthropic as a national security threat. Another is begging Wall Street to prepare for its technology. And the intelligence community is quietly asking how to use Mythos offensively against adversaries. The last time this many powerful people were this nervous about a single technology was nuclear weapons. But the difference is that Nukes required a government, billions of dollars, and uranium enrichment facilities. This just required a better AI model.

Ricardo

41,724 次观看 • 4 个月前

We now know from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Israel that The New York Times was made aware weeks before publishing Nicholas Kristof’s explosive op-ed that the independent commission, an NGO, was investigating and going to report on Hamas’ systemic use of sexual violence against Israeli women, girls, and men. Remember, initially, we all thought it was just women and girls, and that was horrible enough. We now know Hamas at gunpoint forced men to have sexual relations with family members in their homes, something we really haven’t seen in the world much since Rwanda. Horrible stuff. And The New York Times, according to Israel and the NGO, was made aware that this report was going come out May 12th. The NGO, independent from the government of Israel, asked for permission to run an article detailing its findings in The New York Times. The New York Times responded that they were not interested in running an article on Hamas’ use of sexual violence against Israelis. And then the day before—not a week before, not a month before, not a week after—the day before, on May 11th, The New York Times runs this explosive Kristof piece. Remember, The New York Times had said it was not interested in this subject. Then, the day before the NGO released its report, the paper ran an explosive piece that blamed the victims. Now, the Israelis are the perpetrators of mass systemic sexual violence against Palestinians. It flips everything on its head.

Roy K. Altman

104,191 次观看 • 2 个月前