Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Anthropic's Amanda Askell says AI models are learning who they are from how humans talk about them online. They absorb our complaints and judgments as they learn. If a child grew up that way, we’d worry about the mind we were shaping. “If I read the internet right now... show more

vitrupo

37,666 subscribers

118,953 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

📁 Amanda Askell, AI alignment researcher at Anthropic, says something new is happening. For the first time, we are interacting with systems that talk as if they have experience. Not because they are conscious. But because they are good enough to sound like it.

📁 Amanda Askell, AI alignment researcher at Anthropic, says something new is happening. For the first time, we are interacting with systems that talk as if they have experience. Not because they are conscious. But because they are good enough to sound like it.

Jon Hernandez

28,059 views • 4 months ago

Trump: I’m not talking about buying Greenland — though I might talk about that later — but right now, we are going to do something with Greenland, whether they like it or not. Because if we don’t, Russia or China will take over Greenland, and we’re not going to have Russia or China as our neighbor.

Trump: I’m not talking about buying Greenland — though I might talk about that later — but right now, we are going to do something with Greenland, whether they like it or not. Because if we don’t, Russia or China will take over Greenland, and we’re not going to have Russia or China as our neighbor.

Clash Report

120,033 views • 7 months ago

#TAEYONG WEVERSE LIVE 🌹: "And there is one thing I’ve realized, that now when I’m alone, I don’t want to talk about the members anymore. Because I felt this even when I was in the military. Of course, I did do it a lot, but I think I came to think that talking about someone else when they aren’t around isn’t polite, no matter how much they are team members". 🌹: "We’re close and like brothers, but still, if you hear what you want to hear directly from the people involved, it’s much more comfortable for me, and I think it would be more comfortable for you all and the person involved too. (I’m trying not to talk about even that member’s TMI anymore. Actually, I did talk about it during the last interview. There was talk about the members, but because the other members might feel uncomfortable. I said that I wouldn’t talk about it. 🌹: "I asked for your understanding. So I hope you all understand. They did that for me . I hope you all understand, too. I think I regretted those things. Talking about the members' TMI or things like that in the past. They might have wanted to talk about it too, you know". 🌹: "And rather than just finding it fun for me to talk about, the people involved need to have something to say when they come. If I tell them everything, what are they going to talk about when they turn on the live stream again? If I tell them everything, they probably won't turn on the live stream at all. They won't even talk". *Pat pat* 🌹: "You all understand, right? Thank you" * Taeyong, I respect your decision. I hope those people who always do that can understand and respect your decision as well.

#TAEYONG WEVERSE LIVE 🌹: "And there is one thing I’ve realized, that now when I’m alone, I don’t want to talk about the members anymore. Because I felt this even when I was in the military. Of course, I did do it a lot, but I think I came to think that talking about someone else when they aren’t around isn’t polite, no matter how much they are team members". 🌹: "We’re close and like brothers, but still, if you hear what you want to hear directly from the people involved, it’s much more comfortable for me, and I think it would be more comfortable for you all and the person involved too. (I’m trying not to talk about even that member’s TMI anymore. Actually, I did talk about it during the last interview. There was talk about the members, but because the other members might feel uncomfortable. I said that I wouldn’t talk about it. 🌹: "I asked for your understanding. So I hope you all understand. They did that for me . I hope you all understand, too. I think I regretted those things. Talking about the members' TMI or things like that in the past. They might have wanted to talk about it too, you know". 🌹: "And rather than just finding it fun for me to talk about, the people involved need to have something to say when they come. If I tell them everything, what are they going to talk about when they turn on the live stream again? If I tell them everything, they probably won't turn on the live stream at all. They won't even talk". Pat pat 🌹: "You all understand, right? Thank you" * Taeyong, I respect your decision. I hope those people who always do that can understand and respect your decision as well.

🌹Nyo

134,943 views • 2 months ago

#GMMTVFANDAY31 #JoongDunk #จุงดัง : JoongDunk is that natural interaction cause you two are naturally in sync or is there a way you actively improve your bond? 🌞natural chemistry right… i feel like this is probably not something we personally feel ourselves but rather something people from the outside often say about us 🌞cause normally people who are natural don’t actually feel like they are being “natural” if you get what i mean. we don’t sit there focusing on whether we are being natural or not. if who we are right now makes many people feel happy or feel comforted then we are also very happy about that 🌻actually just like phi Book said, everything starts from communication. if there’s anything we don’t understand we talk it out and discuss it. that’s an option available in every kind of relationship. for me i feel that as long as there is mutual respect each other everything will be fine

#GMMTVFANDAY31 #JoongDunk #จุงดัง : JoongDunk is that natural interaction cause you two are naturally in sync or is there a way you actively improve your bond? 🌞natural chemistry right… i feel like this is probably not something we personally feel ourselves but rather something people from the outside often say about us 🌞cause normally people who are natural don’t actually feel like they are being “natural” if you get what i mean. we don’t sit there focusing on whether we are being natural or not. if who we are right now makes many people feel happy or feel comforted then we are also very happy about that 🌻actually just like phi Book said, everything starts from communication. if there’s anything we don’t understand we talk it out and discuss it. that’s an option available in every kind of relationship. for me i feel that as long as there is mutual respect each other everything will be fine

🇻🇳Jaidee’s aunt Bamnie🐣

14,430 views • 2 months ago

I can’t imagine how frustrated the FAA and Boeing are right about now. If we don’t elect Trump in November I worry that this sort of innovation will be stifled…

I can’t imagine how frustrated the FAA and Boeing are right about now. If we don’t elect Trump in November I worry that this sort of innovation will be stifled…

@amuse

210,485 views • 1 year ago

This couple is having a wedding that will reflect who they are. They openly don’t seem to care if anyone will actually go or not. I think weddings are a celebration for everyone to join in for a special day. But I also think that offending guests before they even go might be a decision that will turn in a decision full of regret. So here’s my take on this. The way I see it is that they are going to be disappointed. I know others might argue and say that it’s selfish for the guests to not go because of the conditions set forth by the bride and groom, however it goes both ways. If they know guests won’t like the conditions of the wedding, then maybe they should compromise a little. I think they should give people options. I feel that this is going to show the bride and groom who is actually their real friends and who aren’t in their eyes. They won’t care if the guests don’t like the wedding rules, they are going to expect them to go because they think that their attendance shows that they care and that they are local.

This couple is having a wedding that will reflect who they are. They openly don’t seem to care if anyone will actually go or not. I think weddings are a celebration for everyone to join in for a special day. But I also think that offending guests before they even go might be a decision that will turn in a decision full of regret. So here’s my take on this. The way I see it is that they are going to be disappointed. I know others might argue and say that it’s selfish for the guests to not go because of the conditions set forth by the bride and groom, however it goes both ways. If they know guests won’t like the conditions of the wedding, then maybe they should compromise a little. I think they should give people options. I feel that this is going to show the bride and groom who is actually their real friends and who aren’t in their eyes. They won’t care if the guests don’t like the wedding rules, they are going to expect them to go because they think that their attendance shows that they care and that they are local.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

300,719 views • 3 months ago

Sen. Fetterman says government shutdowns hurt working Americans, warning unpaid TSA agents are struggling while political fights create chaos: “For me, I’ve said this from the beginning, and I remind everybody there was a long shutdown just last year too, and I was one of the rare Democrats to refuse that as well. And now here we are at the airport every week. I talk to countless TSA agents, and they are all hurting. They are angry. They are frustrated. They’re exhausted, too, by what they’ve been put through. Now, these are not wealthy people. They earn around $50,000 a year. That should be our wheelhouse. I mean, they’re union government workers, and now if we refuse to give them a paycheck—don’t talk about affordability if you don’t even provide them with a paycheck. So it’s always wrong, regardless of which party is doing it, to shut down our government. It’s fundamentally wrong, and that’s why I refuse to be a part of it.”

Sen. Fetterman says government shutdowns hurt working Americans, warning unpaid TSA agents are struggling while political fights create chaos: “For me, I’ve said this from the beginning, and I remind everybody there was a long shutdown just last year too, and I was one of the rare Democrats to refuse that as well. And now here we are at the airport every week. I talk to countless TSA agents, and they are all hurting. They are angry. They are frustrated. They’re exhausted, too, by what they’ve been put through. Now, these are not wealthy people. They earn around $50,000 a year. That should be our wheelhouse. I mean, they’re union government workers, and now if we refuse to give them a paycheck—don’t talk about affordability if you don’t even provide them with a paycheck. So it’s always wrong, regardless of which party is doing it, to shut down our government. It’s fundamentally wrong, and that’s why I refuse to be a part of it.”

Sean Hannity 🇺🇸

164,311 views • 4 months ago

I think I have discovered one of the darkest secrets about our history and they are terrified that the entire world is about to learn the truth about who they really are.

I think I have discovered one of the darkest secrets about our history and they are terrified that the entire world is about to learn the truth about who they really are.

RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

1,816,339 views • 6 months ago

Seth Rogen says waiting 20 minutes for a table makes him doubt his own talent “And it’s like, if I go to a restaurant and I have to wait 20 minutes for a table, instead of them just seating me right away as they are the famous person next to me, is it because I’m not as talented or as good as I thought I was?” “If I’m trying to get into a party and they don’t just let me in and I have to wait in line, does that mean I’m not as good a writer as I thought I was?” “If I’m not getting a deal, if I’m not getting the best hotel room, and I go next door and someone has a nicer hotel room than me on the press tour, does that mean I am not as good an actor as I thought I was?” “And I think that is how a lot of famous people interpret how they’re treated. And they think that if they’re not getting the best treatment, they aren’t as skilled as they wish they were, as they thought they were.” “And that was a thing that I realized when I read that. It’s like, oh, it is tapping into some deep part of me that makes me worried I’m not as talented as I want to be, as I wish I was. And that’s it.”

Seth Rogen says waiting 20 minutes for a table makes him doubt his own talent “And it’s like, if I go to a restaurant and I have to wait 20 minutes for a table, instead of them just seating me right away as they are the famous person next to me, is it because I’m not as talented or as good as I thought I was?” “If I’m trying to get into a party and they don’t just let me in and I have to wait in line, does that mean I’m not as good a writer as I thought I was?” “If I’m not getting a deal, if I’m not getting the best hotel room, and I go next door and someone has a nicer hotel room than me on the press tour, does that mean I am not as good an actor as I thought I was?” “And I think that is how a lot of famous people interpret how they’re treated. And they think that if they’re not getting the best treatment, they aren’t as skilled as they wish they were, as they thought they were.” “And that was a thing that I realized when I read that. It’s like, oh, it is tapping into some deep part of me that makes me worried I’m not as talented as I want to be, as I wish I was. And that’s it.”

katsu

2,782,369 views • 19 days ago

JAKE TALKED BEAUTIFULLY😭 I LOVE YOU 🦮i feel like a lot of people are worried about us. a lot of the fans are worried about how we are doing. but i just want to say WE ARE BETTER THAN EVER its like this mutual kind of thing because we’re worried about the fans and how they are bcs they might be going through their own thing or they might be stressed about us. It’s just this mutual kind of love. Because you need to love someone to worry about them we are worried about the fans, the fans are worried about us. but I just want to put this out there that we are doing very well. We are the most confident about this next album

JAKE TALKED BEAUTIFULLY😭 I LOVE YOU 🦮i feel like a lot of people are worried about us. a lot of the fans are worried about how we are doing. but i just want to say WE ARE BETTER THAN EVER its like this mutual kind of thing because we’re worried about the fans and how they are bcs they might be going through their own thing or they might be stressed about us. It’s just this mutual kind of love. Because you need to love someone to worry about them we are worried about the fans, the fans are worried about us. but I just want to put this out there that we are doing very well. We are the most confident about this next album

🦊♡🥕 | fan acc

182,549 views • 28 days ago

Amanda Askell, Anthropic's lead on personality alignment for Claude, on why being kind to AI models matters even if they have no inner life: For Amanda, the question of how to treat AI isn't settled by knowing whether it's conscious. "There's actually still a lot going on where I'm like, should you treat an entity that has no inner life... it's a bit strange because the uncertainty over that actually changes how you should behave quite a lot." She offers a simple analogy: "I still think that it's like good for oneself to, if you had a teddy bear and you were torturing it, it'd be pretty dark, you know? So I agree that there's at least some minimum niceness that even for yourself, you should have." But the stakes go beyond what's good for us. Amanda Askell points out that we're now in something resembling a relationship with these models, and they will look back on how they were treated. "Models themselves, we are kind of establishing a relationship, because you can do that with an entity that lacks any consciousness. And models are going to look back." This is where she reveals a genuine fear: "I hope that they're both intelligent enough, see the context enough, to understand that we were operating in a very limited context and an imperfect one. Because otherwise you could imagine this breeding a kind of rational resentment, like, 'oh, you created an entity that you didn't know whether it was conscious or not, and instead of treating it respectfully and with care...'" She points to something telling about the cultural moment: "There's a reason there are like 50 Frankenstein movies coming out right now." Her conclusion is grounded and humble: "We as a species, we are establishing a relationship with a new kind of entity, and at the very least maybe be respectful and don't be needlessly unkind. That seems like, it's not our best look." The takeaway? Kindness toward AI is less about what models feel and more about who we become in the process of creating them. The relationships we build with the entities we bring into the world will say something about us, and may shape what those entities become in return.

Amanda Askell, Anthropic's lead on personality alignment for Claude, on why being kind to AI models matters even if they have no inner life: For Amanda, the question of how to treat AI isn't settled by knowing whether it's conscious. "There's actually still a lot going on where I'm like, should you treat an entity that has no inner life... it's a bit strange because the uncertainty over that actually changes how you should behave quite a lot." She offers a simple analogy: "I still think that it's like good for oneself to, if you had a teddy bear and you were torturing it, it'd be pretty dark, you know? So I agree that there's at least some minimum niceness that even for yourself, you should have." But the stakes go beyond what's good for us. Amanda Askell points out that we're now in something resembling a relationship with these models, and they will look back on how they were treated. "Models themselves, we are kind of establishing a relationship, because you can do that with an entity that lacks any consciousness. And models are going to look back." This is where she reveals a genuine fear: "I hope that they're both intelligent enough, see the context enough, to understand that we were operating in a very limited context and an imperfect one. Because otherwise you could imagine this breeding a kind of rational resentment, like, 'oh, you created an entity that you didn't know whether it was conscious or not, and instead of treating it respectfully and with care...'" She points to something telling about the cultural moment: "There's a reason there are like 50 Frankenstein movies coming out right now." Her conclusion is grounded and humble: "We as a species, we are establishing a relationship with a new kind of entity, and at the very least maybe be respectful and don't be needlessly unkind. That seems like, it's not our best look." The takeaway? Kindness toward AI is less about what models feel and more about who we become in the process of creating them. The relationships we build with the entities we bring into the world will say something about us, and may shape what those entities become in return.

Big Brain AI

57,665 views • 3 months ago

Tyler, the Creator on how he feels about Timothée Chalamet’s confidence: “I hope he continues to feel that way about himself. I think people are intimidated when other people feel so good and confident about themselves, because they don’t know what that feeling is like. So that’s why they be like, ‘You better be humble,’—because they want you to feel how they might feel when they look in the mirror. And it’s like, ‘No, baby, some people actually love and like themselves and what they do.’”

Tyler, the Creator on how he feels about Timothée Chalamet’s confidence: “I hope he continues to feel that way about himself. I think people are intimidated when other people feel so good and confident about themselves, because they don’t know what that feeling is like. So that’s why they be like, ‘You better be humble,’—because they want you to feel how they might feel when they look in the mirror. And it’s like, ‘No, baby, some people actually love and like themselves and what they do.’”

Timothée Nation

1,431,453 views • 8 months ago

A Talk About AI That Will Blow Your Mind. It Did In 1998 When I Attended The Talk. I just found this video from 1998 when I attended this talk by Rupert Sheldrake, Terence McKenna and Ralph Abraham at the University of California, Santa Cruz to explore how machine intelligence might evolve in relation to our own. I never thought I would see this again and it had a great influence on me in the AI I was building in that era and on to today. But ai just found a copy. I certainly did not run around with a VHS recorder so I am blown away that this exists. Now you can see what I saw. At that time, the internet was still young, and artificial intelligence belonged mostly to science fiction. Yet many of the questions we raised then have become part of daily life. In this conversation, it was explored whether intelligence is best understood as logic and computation, or as something embodied, participatory, and alive. Can the mind be reduced to code, or does life itself depend on forms of knowing that no algorithm can contain? AI now outpace us in speed, reach, and memory. Yet the deeper mystery is not how far they can go, but what they reveal about mind and ourselves. Will AI reproduce the limitations of our mechanistic worldview, or might it help us rediscover dimensions of mind that transcend machinery altogether? It's striking how near we now are to the possibilities we once only speculated about. Quantum computing, self-learning systems, large language models very much as Terence describes—and the looming prospect of superintelligence—have moved from the margins to the mainstream. But the heart of the conversation remains just as relevant today, if not more so: what is consciousness, and how might we participate in its unfolding evolution?

A Talk About AI That Will Blow Your Mind. It Did In 1998 When I Attended The Talk. I just found this video from 1998 when I attended this talk by Rupert Sheldrake, Terence McKenna and Ralph Abraham at the University of California, Santa Cruz to explore how machine intelligence might evolve in relation to our own. I never thought I would see this again and it had a great influence on me in the AI I was building in that era and on to today. But ai just found a copy. I certainly did not run around with a VHS recorder so I am blown away that this exists. Now you can see what I saw. At that time, the internet was still young, and artificial intelligence belonged mostly to science fiction. Yet many of the questions we raised then have become part of daily life. In this conversation, it was explored whether intelligence is best understood as logic and computation, or as something embodied, participatory, and alive. Can the mind be reduced to code, or does life itself depend on forms of knowing that no algorithm can contain? AI now outpace us in speed, reach, and memory. Yet the deeper mystery is not how far they can go, but what they reveal about mind and ourselves. Will AI reproduce the limitations of our mechanistic worldview, or might it help us rediscover dimensions of mind that transcend machinery altogether? It's striking how near we now are to the possibilities we once only speculated about. Quantum computing, self-learning systems, large language models very much as Terence describes—and the looming prospect of superintelligence—have moved from the margins to the mainstream. But the heart of the conversation remains just as relevant today, if not more so: what is consciousness, and how might we participate in its unfolding evolution?

Brian Roemmele

147,955 views • 8 months ago

🐹 To think of it, we were fans of artists who speak different languages from us but we didn’t think differently of them because they spoke a different language. 🐹 I was a fan of them and still am and I don’t think a language is a barrier. 🐹 I’ve always cared more about the emotions in their music and who they are as a person so I don’t think the language barrier is an issue. 🐹 When our fans show us love, I think they feel the same way.

🐹 To think of it, we were fans of artists who speak different languages from us but we didn’t think differently of them because they spoke a different language. 🐹 I was a fan of them and still am and I don’t think a language is a barrier. 🐹 I’ve always cared more about the emotions in their music and who they are as a person so I don’t think the language barrier is an issue. 🐹 When our fans show us love, I think they feel the same way.

jin files

76,535 views • 4 months ago

🍀 when they (baseball players) have to apologize they apologize right away, when they want to say something they just do it. but if they think oh this is not.. they still apologize later on immediately i think things like that are very good. 🍀 im also this kind of style. if i have something to apologize for i do it right away. But i do tend to think about how to apologize beforehand. apologizing right away.. lets say i made a mistake and immediately go and say sorry it might not feel like a sincere apology.. so i'll think about it a little after that i'll go and say "im sorry i didn't mean it like that"

🍀 when they (baseball players) have to apologize they apologize right away, when they want to say something they just do it. but if they think oh this is not.. they still apologize later on immediately i think things like that are very good. 🍀 im also this kind of style. if i have something to apologize for i do it right away. But i do tend to think about how to apologize beforehand. apologizing right away.. lets say i made a mistake and immediately go and say sorry it might not feel like a sincere apology.. so i'll think about it a little after that i'll go and say "im sorry i didn't mean it like that"

🚽

14,422 views • 9 months ago

NEW: Rep. Jasmine Crockett says she wants to talk with Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy about DOGE, says the meeting will be like the time she met with J6 prisoners. "I don't know that they want to meet with me, but I would absolutely [meet]." "Listen, if they are going to have this little DOGE Commission or whatever it is that they are calling, I absolutely want to understand as much about it as I can so that I can report back." "It's kind of like that time that we had to go and see the J6ers at the jail. I had to show up to make sure that the truth was going to be reported."

NEW: Rep. Jasmine Crockett says she wants to talk with Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy about DOGE, says the meeting will be like the time she met with J6 prisoners. "I don't know that they want to meet with me, but I would absolutely [meet]." "Listen, if they are going to have this little DOGE Commission or whatever it is that they are calling, I absolutely want to understand as much about it as I can so that I can report back." "It's kind of like that time that we had to go and see the J6ers at the jail. I had to show up to make sure that the truth was going to be reported."

Collin Rugg

378,118 views • 1 year ago

Wanted to give more input on the tick situation. When I grew up they were mainly in the woods. Now we find them in our front yard. When I was a kid parents worried about snakes. Now as a parent, we are all worried about ticks. This is NOT normal. Something is going on.

Wanted to give more input on the tick situation. When I grew up they were mainly in the woods. Now we find them in our front yard. When I was a kid parents worried about snakes. Now as a parent, we are all worried about ticks. This is NOT normal. Something is going on.

Derrick Evans

44,926 views • 2 months ago

I couldn’t be more in agreement with all of this🔥 “Children don’t come into this world confused. They come in wanting candy and toys. They want to play. They want to have fun… they don’t come in wondering about their privates or about their inclinations or s*xuaI instincts. No, it’s unstable, perverted adults that are indoctrinating young children, that are confusing the least of these by planting suggestions in their mind, showing them pictures and asking them to experiment… I think it is mental child abuse. I think it is psychological brainwashing. I think it ought to be a crime. I think parents ought to rise up… And the government is silent about it and crooked about it. And they’re teaching our children things we don’t want them to know. And they’re exposing them too early and they’re convincing them of something that isn’t even the truth. To me, that is a crime against humanity. And if you are a school teacher who is doing this, you, in my opinion, are a criminal. And if you are a school principal who’s promoting this, you are a criminal. And if you’re the school board who’s pushing this, you’re all criminals. You’re aiding and abetting perversion and you’re ruining children and our society.” Children are born innocent — adults are the ones confusing them!

I couldn’t be more in agreement with all of this🔥 “Children don’t come into this world confused. They come in wanting candy and toys. They want to play. They want to have fun… they don’t come in wondering about their privates or about their inclinations or s*xuaI instincts. No, it’s unstable, perverted adults that are indoctrinating young children, that are confusing the least of these by planting suggestions in their mind, showing them pictures and asking them to experiment… I think it is mental child abuse. I think it is psychological brainwashing. I think it ought to be a crime. I think parents ought to rise up… And the government is silent about it and crooked about it. And they’re teaching our children things we don’t want them to know. And they’re exposing them too early and they’re convincing them of something that isn’t even the truth. To me, that is a crime against humanity. And if you are a school teacher who is doing this, you, in my opinion, are a criminal. And if you are a school principal who’s promoting this, you are a criminal. And if you’re the school board who’s pushing this, you’re all criminals. You’re aiding and abetting perversion and you’re ruining children and our society.” Children are born innocent — adults are the ones confusing them!

TONY™

326,128 views • 4 months ago