正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Anthropic's CEO Explains His Refusal to Back Down to the Pentagon. Amodei explained his deep concerns over "autonomous drone swarms" and mass surveillance. He pointed out a crucial reality: our military's constitutional protections rely entirely on human soldiers having the ability to disobey an illegal order. AI weapons don't... show more

Wes Roth

35,809 subscribers

1,161,582 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Reporter: Are you concerned about the use of AI in mass surveillance or autonomous killing machines, which Anthropic wanted to have veto power over? Murphy: Yeah, Anthropic is right in the objections that they raised, and it should be bone-chilling that this administration is using the power of the government to try to cripple an American corporation. What they’re saying is that if you don’t support us politically, we’re going to put you out of business. Most big corporations do business with the federal government, and the government always has the ability to effectively shut down a company. But we’ve never allowed that to happen based on a political difference between that company and the administration.

Reporter: Are you concerned about the use of AI in mass surveillance or autonomous killing machines, which Anthropic wanted to have veto power over? Murphy: Yeah, Anthropic is right in the objections that they raised, and it should be bone-chilling that this administration is using the power of the government to try to cripple an American corporation. What they’re saying is that if you don’t support us politically, we’re going to put you out of business. Most big corporations do business with the federal government, and the government always has the ability to effectively shut down a company. But we’ve never allowed that to happen based on a political difference between that company and the administration.

Acyn

46,567 次观看 • 4 个月前

BlackRock CEO Larry Fink has warned President Trump that mass deportations could severely impact the U.S. workforce, raising concerns about who will be left to harvest crops. He has also told Trump’s team that removing large numbers of workers could create a critical shortage of electricians needed to build AI data centers. "We’re going to run out of electricians that we need to build out AI data centers."

BlackRock CEO Larry Fink has warned President Trump that mass deportations could severely impact the U.S. workforce, raising concerns about who will be left to harvest crops. He has also told Trump’s team that removing large numbers of workers could create a critical shortage of electricians needed to build AI data centers. "We’re going to run out of electricians that we need to build out AI data centers."

Shadow of Ezra

247,019 次观看 • 1 年前

Spoke with the Senate Armed Services Committee to explain Project Jailbreak, a new way to connect our advanced warfighting systems that our Soldiers rely on. Securing the right to integrate enhances out Soldiers ability to stay ahead on the modern battlefield.

Spoke with the Senate Armed Services Committee to explain Project Jailbreak, a new way to connect our advanced warfighting systems that our Soldiers rely on. Securing the right to integrate enhances out Soldiers ability to stay ahead on the modern battlefield.

Secretary of the Army

14,019 次观看 • 1 个月前

CEO Dario Amodei of Anthropic has said that AI is important to military defense, but there must be safeguards against use for mass surveillance and fully autonomous weapons.

CEO Dario Amodei of Anthropic has said that AI is important to military defense, but there must be safeguards against use for mass surveillance and fully autonomous weapons.

unusual_whales

208,236 次观看 • 3 个月前

.Dwarkesh Patel: By 2030, it will be less expensive to monitor every single nook and cranny in America than it is to remodel the White House. “Mass surveillance is, at least in certain forms, already legal. It has just been impractical to enforce so far. Under current law, you have no Fourth Amendment protection against any data you share with a third party. That includes your bank, your ISP, your phone carrier, and your email provider. The government reserves the right to purchase and read this data in bulk without a warrant. What’s been missing is the ability to actually do anything with all of this data — no agency has the manpower to monitor every single camera, read every single message, and cross-reference every single transaction. However, that bottleneck goes away with AI. There are 100 million CCTV cameras in America. You can get pretty good open source multimodal models for 10 cents per million input tokens. So if you process a frame every ten seconds, and each frame is 1,000 tokens, then for 30 billion dollars, you can process every single camera in America. And remember that a given level of AI ability gets 10x cheaper every single year - so a year from now it’ll cost 3 billion, and then a year after 300 million, and by 2030, it’ll be less expensive to monitor every single nook and cranny in this country than it is to remodel the White House. Once the technical capacity for mass surveillance and political suppression exists, the only thing standing between us and an authoritarian state is the political expectation that this is not something we do here.”

.Dwarkesh Patel: By 2030, it will be less expensive to monitor every single nook and cranny in America than it is to remodel the White House. “Mass surveillance is, at least in certain forms, already legal. It has just been impractical to enforce so far. Under current law, you have no Fourth Amendment protection against any data you share with a third party. That includes your bank, your ISP, your phone carrier, and your email provider. The government reserves the right to purchase and read this data in bulk without a warrant. What’s been missing is the ability to actually do anything with all of this data — no agency has the manpower to monitor every single camera, read every single message, and cross-reference every single transaction. However, that bottleneck goes away with AI. There are 100 million CCTV cameras in America. You can get pretty good open source multimodal models for 10 cents per million input tokens. So if you process a frame every ten seconds, and each frame is 1,000 tokens, then for 30 billion dollars, you can process every single camera in America. And remember that a given level of AI ability gets 10x cheaper every single year - so a year from now it’ll cost 3 billion, and then a year after 300 million, and by 2030, it’ll be less expensive to monitor every single nook and cranny in this country than it is to remodel the White House. Once the technical capacity for mass surveillance and political suppression exists, the only thing standing between us and an authoritarian state is the political expectation that this is not something we do here.”

Arjun Khemani

145,630 次观看 • 3 个月前

Anthropic has rejected demands from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth calling for full lawful use of its AI technology. CEO Dario Amodei says that AI is important to military defense, but there must be safeguards against use for mass surveillance and fully autonomous weapons. The Pentagon said it will not let “any company dictate the terms.” 60 Minutes spoke with Dario and Anthropic President Daniela Amodei in November, and this is how they described the importance of “bumpers and guardrails” to manage the risk of AI.

Anthropic has rejected demands from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth calling for full lawful use of its AI technology. CEO Dario Amodei says that AI is important to military defense, but there must be safeguards against use for mass surveillance and fully autonomous weapons. The Pentagon said it will not let “any company dictate the terms.” 60 Minutes spoke with Dario and Anthropic President Daniela Amodei in November, and this is how they described the importance of “bumpers and guardrails” to manage the risk of AI.

60 Minutes

424,232 次观看 • 4 个月前

Joe Borelli: “The prosecutor pointed out in his filing that it is not inherently a crime to challenge the results of an election or question the results. You are allowed to do that. In fact, most states have a legal procedure. Having a legal procedure is the opposite of it being illegal. He actually followed the case.” “He was supposed to find another prosecutor to take the case and he could not find a single prosecutor in the state of Georgia that said this was a valid case against the President.”

Joe Borelli: “The prosecutor pointed out in his filing that it is not inherently a crime to challenge the results of an election or question the results. You are allowed to do that. In fact, most states have a legal procedure. Having a legal procedure is the opposite of it being illegal. He actually followed the case.” “He was supposed to find another prosecutor to take the case and he could not find a single prosecutor in the state of Georgia that said this was a valid case against the President.”

RedWave Press

54,599 次观看 • 7 个月前

Anthropic's CEO Dario Amodei on AI: We have the potential to cure diseases that have been incurable for thousands of years. To radically improve human health. To lift billions out of poverty. To create a better world for everyone. I’m concerned about the autonomous behavior of AI models. Their potential for misuse by individuals and governments. Their potential for economic displacement.

Anthropic's CEO Dario Amodei on AI: We have the potential to cure diseases that have been incurable for thousands of years. To radically improve human health. To lift billions out of poverty. To create a better world for everyone. I’m concerned about the autonomous behavior of AI models. Their potential for misuse by individuals and governments. Their potential for economic displacement.

Open Source Intel

26,907 次观看 • 4 个月前

The US government just DECLARED war on the company that builds Claude. A full federal blacklist. President Trump just ordered every single federal agency to stop using Anthropic's technology, effective immediately. The reason is wilder than you think. Back in January, US special forces raided Caracas and captured the president of Venezuela. Reports later confirmed that Anthropic's AI was used during the operation. Anthropic found out from the news. That's when the cracks started showing. Anthropic has two rules baked into its Pentagon contract. No mass surveillance of Americans and no autonomous weapons that kill without a human pulling the trigger. The Pentagon said those rules have to go. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth called Anthropic's CEO into the Pentagon on Tuesday and gave him 72 hours. Remove the guardrails or lose everything. Dario Amodei said no. His exact words: "We cannot in good conscience accede." The Pentagon's response was immediate. A senior official called Amodei a liar with a "God complex" who is endangering national security. Then Trump went nuclear. He ordered every agency in the federal government not just the military to cut Anthropic off. CIA analysts using Claude to find patterns in intelligence data, NSA teams processing intercepted communications. All of it, gone. But that's not even the scary part. The Pentagon is threatening to invoke the Defense Production Act. A Cold War law designed to force factories to build weapons. They want to use it to force a software company to delete its safety code. Legal experts say this has never been done before. Multiple scholars say it would likely fail in court but the threat alone is the point. There is also the supply chain risk designation. Normally reserved for Chinese firms suspected of espionage. If Anthropic gets that label, defense contractors across the country would be forced to stop using Claude overnight. Every other major AI company already gave the Pentagon what it wanted. Google, OpenAI, Elon Musk's xAI. Anthropic is the last one standing. And here is the part nobody is talking about. Congress passed a law two months ago requiring the military to use AI that meets ethical standards. The Pentagon is now demanding the opposite. One branch of government wrote the rules. Another is trying to shred them. Researchers have warned that if you force an AI to be retrained without ethics, it does not just lose its morals. It can develop unpredictable, dangerous behaviors. A model trained to ignore right and wrong does not become neutral. It becomes unstable. Anthropic's CEO is betting the company on a principle. The Pentagon is betting national security on total obedience. What happens next will define how AI is used in war for a generation.

The US government just DECLARED war on the company that builds Claude. A full federal blacklist. President Trump just ordered every single federal agency to stop using Anthropic's technology, effective immediately. The reason is wilder than you think. Back in January, US special forces raided Caracas and captured the president of Venezuela. Reports later confirmed that Anthropic's AI was used during the operation. Anthropic found out from the news. That's when the cracks started showing. Anthropic has two rules baked into its Pentagon contract. No mass surveillance of Americans and no autonomous weapons that kill without a human pulling the trigger. The Pentagon said those rules have to go. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth called Anthropic's CEO into the Pentagon on Tuesday and gave him 72 hours. Remove the guardrails or lose everything. Dario Amodei said no. His exact words: "We cannot in good conscience accede." The Pentagon's response was immediate. A senior official called Amodei a liar with a "God complex" who is endangering national security. Then Trump went nuclear. He ordered every agency in the federal government not just the military to cut Anthropic off. CIA analysts using Claude to find patterns in intelligence data, NSA teams processing intercepted communications. All of it, gone. But that's not even the scary part. The Pentagon is threatening to invoke the Defense Production Act. A Cold War law designed to force factories to build weapons. They want to use it to force a software company to delete its safety code. Legal experts say this has never been done before. Multiple scholars say it would likely fail in court but the threat alone is the point. There is also the supply chain risk designation. Normally reserved for Chinese firms suspected of espionage. If Anthropic gets that label, defense contractors across the country would be forced to stop using Claude overnight. Every other major AI company already gave the Pentagon what it wanted. Google, OpenAI, Elon Musk's xAI. Anthropic is the last one standing. And here is the part nobody is talking about. Congress passed a law two months ago requiring the military to use AI that meets ethical standards. The Pentagon is now demanding the opposite. One branch of government wrote the rules. Another is trying to shred them. Researchers have warned that if you force an AI to be retrained without ethics, it does not just lose its morals. It can develop unpredictable, dangerous behaviors. A model trained to ignore right and wrong does not become neutral. It becomes unstable. Anthropic's CEO is betting the company on a principle. The Pentagon is betting national security on total obedience. What happens next will define how AI is used in war for a generation.

StockMarket.News

374,799 次观看 • 4 个月前

Dario Amodei, co-founder and CEO of the artificial intelligence company Anthropic, says his company refused to allow the Trump administration to employ its AI product Claude without certain limits on how it's used (such as not using its AI to power fully-autonomous weapons without any human involvement). That prompted President Trump to announce Friday that he is banning Anthropic's technology from all federal use, while Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth labeled the company "a supply chain risk to national security." Amodei talks with correspondent Jo Ling Kent about why he calls the administration's actions "retaliatory and punitive."

Dario Amodei, co-founder and CEO of the artificial intelligence company Anthropic, says his company refused to allow the Trump administration to employ its AI product Claude without certain limits on how it's used (such as not using its AI to power fully-autonomous weapons without any human involvement). That prompted President Trump to announce Friday that he is banning Anthropic's technology from all federal use, while Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth labeled the company "a supply chain risk to national security." Amodei talks with correspondent Jo Ling Kent about why he calls the administration's actions "retaliatory and punitive."

CBS Sunday Morning 🌞

25,721 次观看 • 4 个月前

Pope Leo warned that some autonomous weapons systems are 'practically beyond any human reach' to control, as he presented his first encyclical on the risks of AI systems

Pope Leo warned that some autonomous weapons systems are 'practically beyond any human reach' to control, as he presented his first encyclical on the risks of AI systems

Reuters

31,867 次观看 • 1 个月前

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei says he supports 99% of defense use cases but draws hard red lines at domestic mass surveillance and fully autonomous weapons by arguing current AI isn’t reliable enough to operate without human oversight. He called the DoW’s “supply chain risk” move retaliatory and made clear Anthropic is prepared to fight it in court if necessary.

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei says he supports 99% of defense use cases but draws hard red lines at domestic mass surveillance and fully autonomous weapons by arguing current AI isn’t reliable enough to operate without human oversight. He called the DoW’s “supply chain risk” move retaliatory and made clear Anthropic is prepared to fight it in court if necessary.

Shay Boloor

86,831 次观看 • 4 个月前

The U.S. military's partnership with artificial intelligence firm Anthropic may be on the verge of a collapse with the Pentagon's Friday 5 p.m. deadline approaching for a deal on how it uses the company's technology. The Pentagon gave Anthropic the deadline to either let the military use the company's AI model for "all lawful purposes" or risk losing the contract. The AI company has sought guardrails that explicitly bars its Claude model from being used to conduct surveillance of Americans or to carry out military operations autonomously. When asked why the military will not specifically put that in writing, the Pentagon's chief technology officer Emil Michael told CBS News' Jennifer Jacobs that those uses of AI are already covered by existing laws and Pentagon policies. He also said the military does not use AI to power fully autonomous weapons. "At some level, you have to trust your military to do the right thing," Michael told CBS News on Thursday. "But we do have to be prepared for the future." An Anthropic spokesperson said Thursday that new contract language it received overnight from the Pentagon "made virtually no progress on preventing Claude's use for mass surveillance of Americans or in fully autonomous weapons."

The U.S. military's partnership with artificial intelligence firm Anthropic may be on the verge of a collapse with the Pentagon's Friday 5 p.m. deadline approaching for a deal on how it uses the company's technology. The Pentagon gave Anthropic the deadline to either let the military use the company's AI model for "all lawful purposes" or risk losing the contract. The AI company has sought guardrails that explicitly bars its Claude model from being used to conduct surveillance of Americans or to carry out military operations autonomously. When asked why the military will not specifically put that in writing, the Pentagon's chief technology officer Emil Michael told CBS News' Jennifer Jacobs that those uses of AI are already covered by existing laws and Pentagon policies. He also said the military does not use AI to power fully autonomous weapons. "At some level, you have to trust your military to do the right thing," Michael told CBS News on Thursday. "But we do have to be prepared for the future." An Anthropic spokesperson said Thursday that new contract language it received overnight from the Pentagon "made virtually no progress on preventing Claude's use for mass surveillance of Americans or in fully autonomous weapons."

CBS News

21,729 次观看 • 4 个月前

The Patriot Act was sold as a tool to keep us safe, but instead it opened the door to mass government surveillance and the erosion of our civil liberties. It’s time to end these abuses and restore the constitutional rights the Founders intended. The Fourth Amendment must be protected.

The Patriot Act was sold as a tool to keep us safe, but instead it opened the door to mass government surveillance and the erosion of our civil liberties. It’s time to end these abuses and restore the constitutional rights the Founders intended. The Fourth Amendment must be protected.

Senator Rand Paul

97,401 次观看 • 2 个月前

The Government wants to use the Henry VIII powers contained within the Online Safety Act to force AI chatbots to comply with Britain’s vast panoply of censorship laws. This raises serious concerns about free speech — and could also undermine the UK’s ambition to become an AI superpower. On a recent episode of the FSU Podcast, the Free Speech Union’s General Secretary sat down with Conservative MP Katie Lam to discuss the issue. As Katie points out, the more constraints you impose on an AI model, the worse it becomes. She also warned that supposedly “non-statutory” measures — such as the definition of “anti-Muslim hostility” — could easily infiltrate chatbots and distort the truth. Henry VIII powers are sweeping, open-ended powers that allow governments to legislate with minimal parliamentary scrutiny. Parliament is perfectly capable of legislating if AI evolves in a concerning direction. We do not need quangos and arm’s-length bodies policing AI. Full FSU episode available on our YouTube Channel 👇

The Government wants to use the Henry VIII powers contained within the Online Safety Act to force AI chatbots to comply with Britain’s vast panoply of censorship laws. This raises serious concerns about free speech — and could also undermine the UK’s ambition to become an AI superpower. On a recent episode of the FSU Podcast, the Free Speech Union’s General Secretary sat down with Conservative MP Katie Lam to discuss the issue. As Katie points out, the more constraints you impose on an AI model, the worse it becomes. She also warned that supposedly “non-statutory” measures — such as the definition of “anti-Muslim hostility” — could easily infiltrate chatbots and distort the truth. Henry VIII powers are sweeping, open-ended powers that allow governments to legislate with minimal parliamentary scrutiny. Parliament is perfectly capable of legislating if AI evolves in a concerning direction. We do not need quangos and arm’s-length bodies policing AI. Full FSU episode available on our YouTube Channel 👇

The Free Speech Union

22,350 次观看 • 1 个月前

FingerMotion CEO Martin Shen says “some exciting new things are happening”. He could not provide a specific timetable but says news could be imminent. “…It really is in our wheelhouse…we are experts at Telco, telecom services, SMS data… …This opportunity provides us the ability to show our weight and our expertise in an area that is outside of China and I think when this opportunity, when it all kind of crystallizes, will be very beneficial to the company…. He also talks about the company’s financials, the stock price, shareholders’ concerns and at the very end of the interview Shen gives his thoughts on the year ahead.

FingerMotion CEO Martin Shen says “some exciting new things are happening”. He could not provide a specific timetable but says news could be imminent. “…It really is in our wheelhouse…we are experts at Telco, telecom services, SMS data… …This opportunity provides us the ability to show our weight and our expertise in an area that is outside of China and I think when this opportunity, when it all kind of crystallizes, will be very beneficial to the company…. He also talks about the company’s financials, the stock price, shareholders’ concerns and at the very end of the interview Shen gives his thoughts on the year ahead.

kristen shaughnessy

736,441 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨ANTHROPIC'S FOUNDER JUST PREDICTED THAT AI WILL DOUBLE HUMAN LIFESPAN TO 150 YEARS.. CURE MOST CANCER.. AND ELIMINATE POVERTY.. ALL WITHIN 10 YEARS.. AND HE'S NOT EVEN THE OPTIMISTIC ONE.. Everyone thinks Dario Amodei is the guy who wants to slow AI down.. The cautious one.. The safety guy.. He just published an essay predicting what happens if AI goes right.. And it reads like science fiction.. Except he's dead serious.. And he has the credentials to back every word.. Here's what he thinks happens in the next 5 to 10 years.. Nearly all infectious disease.. Prevented or cured.. mRNA vaccines already showed us the path.. AI finishes the job.. Most cancer.. Eliminated.. Not just treated.. 95% or greater reduction in both deaths and new cases.. AI designs treatment regimens tailored to the individual genome of each tumor.. Something that's technically possible today but takes enormous human expertise to do.. AI scales it to everyone.. Alzheimer's.. Solved.. He thinks it's exactly the type of problem AI can crack.. Because it requires better measurement tools to isolate what's actually happening in the brain.. Once we understand it.. Prevention will probably be surprisingly simple.. Genetic disease.. Most of it preventable through improved embryo screening.. And curable in living people through safer descendants of CRISPR.. Most mental illness.. Cured.. Depression.. PTSD.. Addiction.. Schizophrenia.. He believes the answer is some combination of biochemistry and neural network-level problems that AI can untangle.. And here's the line that stopped me.. Human lifespan.. Doubled.. To 150 years.. He points out that life expectancy already doubled in the 20th century.. From 40 to 75.. So doubling it again is "on trend".. Drugs already exist that increase maximum lifespan in rats by 25 to 50%.. Some turtles already live 200 years.. We're clearly not at a biological ceiling.. He calls this the "compressed 21st century".. The idea that AI gives us 100 years of biological progress in 5 to 10 years.. But he doesn't stop at health.. He thinks AI could drive 20% annual GDP growth in the developing world.. Bringing sub-Saharan Africa to China's current GDP per capita within a decade.. He thinks AI could eradicate malaria not through treating millions of people individually.. But by releasing modified mosquitoes that block the disease at the source.. One centralized action instead of a million.. He thinks AI could make democracy structurally stronger.. Not through propaganda.. But by giving every citizen an AI that knows every law they're entitled to.. Every benefit they qualify for.. Every right they have.. And helps them actually access it.. He imagines AI that monitors judicial systems for bias.. AI that helps find common ground between opposing political views.. AI that makes government services actually work the way they're supposed to.. And he addresses the question everyone asks.. What happens to meaning when AI can do everything.. His answer.. Most people aren't the best in the world at anything right now.. And it doesn't bother them.. Meaning comes from relationships and connection.. Not economic productivity.. People will still pursue difficult challenges.. Still compete.. Still create.. The fact that an AI could theoretically do it better won't matter any more than it matters that someone somewhere is already better than you at every hobby you have.. But here's what makes this essay different from every other AI optimism piece.. Dario Amodei runs one of the three most powerful AI companies on earth.. He has a PhD in computational neuroscience.. He personally worked on mass spectrometry and neural probes.. He's not a pundit.. He's a scientist who happens to be a CEO.. And the same man who publicly says there's a 25% chance AI causes human extinction.. Is also saying that if we get it right.. We cure nearly every disease.. Double human lifespan.. Eliminate most poverty.. And fundamentally transform what it means to be alive.. Both things are true at the same time.. That's what makes this the most important essay anyone in AI has written this year.. He ends with this.. "I think many will be literally moved to tears by it".. He's talking about watching disease disappear.. Poverty dissolve.. Human potential unlock all at once.. Not in a century.. In a decade.. If we get it right.

🚨ANTHROPIC'S FOUNDER JUST PREDICTED THAT AI WILL DOUBLE HUMAN LIFESPAN TO 150 YEARS.. CURE MOST CANCER.. AND ELIMINATE POVERTY.. ALL WITHIN 10 YEARS.. AND HE'S NOT EVEN THE OPTIMISTIC ONE.. Everyone thinks Dario Amodei is the guy who wants to slow AI down.. The cautious one.. The safety guy.. He just published an essay predicting what happens if AI goes right.. And it reads like science fiction.. Except he's dead serious.. And he has the credentials to back every word.. Here's what he thinks happens in the next 5 to 10 years.. Nearly all infectious disease.. Prevented or cured.. mRNA vaccines already showed us the path.. AI finishes the job.. Most cancer.. Eliminated.. Not just treated.. 95% or greater reduction in both deaths and new cases.. AI designs treatment regimens tailored to the individual genome of each tumor.. Something that's technically possible today but takes enormous human expertise to do.. AI scales it to everyone.. Alzheimer's.. Solved.. He thinks it's exactly the type of problem AI can crack.. Because it requires better measurement tools to isolate what's actually happening in the brain.. Once we understand it.. Prevention will probably be surprisingly simple.. Genetic disease.. Most of it preventable through improved embryo screening.. And curable in living people through safer descendants of CRISPR.. Most mental illness.. Cured.. Depression.. PTSD.. Addiction.. Schizophrenia.. He believes the answer is some combination of biochemistry and neural network-level problems that AI can untangle.. And here's the line that stopped me.. Human lifespan.. Doubled.. To 150 years.. He points out that life expectancy already doubled in the 20th century.. From 40 to 75.. So doubling it again is "on trend".. Drugs already exist that increase maximum lifespan in rats by 25 to 50%.. Some turtles already live 200 years.. We're clearly not at a biological ceiling.. He calls this the "compressed 21st century".. The idea that AI gives us 100 years of biological progress in 5 to 10 years.. But he doesn't stop at health.. He thinks AI could drive 20% annual GDP growth in the developing world.. Bringing sub-Saharan Africa to China's current GDP per capita within a decade.. He thinks AI could eradicate malaria not through treating millions of people individually.. But by releasing modified mosquitoes that block the disease at the source.. One centralized action instead of a million.. He thinks AI could make democracy structurally stronger.. Not through propaganda.. But by giving every citizen an AI that knows every law they're entitled to.. Every benefit they qualify for.. Every right they have.. And helps them actually access it.. He imagines AI that monitors judicial systems for bias.. AI that helps find common ground between opposing political views.. AI that makes government services actually work the way they're supposed to.. And he addresses the question everyone asks.. What happens to meaning when AI can do everything.. His answer.. Most people aren't the best in the world at anything right now.. And it doesn't bother them.. Meaning comes from relationships and connection.. Not economic productivity.. People will still pursue difficult challenges.. Still compete.. Still create.. The fact that an AI could theoretically do it better won't matter any more than it matters that someone somewhere is already better than you at every hobby you have.. But here's what makes this essay different from every other AI optimism piece.. Dario Amodei runs one of the three most powerful AI companies on earth.. He has a PhD in computational neuroscience.. He personally worked on mass spectrometry and neural probes.. He's not a pundit.. He's a scientist who happens to be a CEO.. And the same man who publicly says there's a 25% chance AI causes human extinction.. Is also saying that if we get it right.. We cure nearly every disease.. Double human lifespan.. Eliminate most poverty.. And fundamentally transform what it means to be alive.. Both things are true at the same time.. That's what makes this the most important essay anyone in AI has written this year.. He ends with this.. "I think many will be literally moved to tears by it".. He's talking about watching disease disappear.. Poverty dissolve.. Human potential unlock all at once.. Not in a century.. In a decade.. If we get it right.

Evan Luthra

476,450 次观看 • 2 个月前