正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
Anthropic's Claude Design launch blindsided its partners, Figma and Canva. “Essentially, Anthropic had kind of told these partners like Figma and Canva that the Claude Design product was going to be fairly basic.” “As it got closer to the launch, these partners found out that actually this new product... show more
22 条评论

For all its public 'nice-guy' marketing, Anthropic is extremely aggressive and brazenly monopolistic in its business tactics. They devoured coding and design, and they will soon do the same to finance and life sciences. I talk myself into psychosis about this. But it's true.

Anthropic is that anti-human company, and you can't ever let them win.

It’s was always a no-brainer that Anthropic is gonna eat the whole stack between the consumer and the model. They might even gun for the chips and co too once their models can augment that sufficiently enough

I bet most who post in here don't realize it was basically one then three people who created Claude design. It was not a big corporate takeover and it is pretty ignorant to portray it as such

I think figma/canva need to realize their "advanced features" just take a single prompt on claude code with fable to build

Relying on fox not to be a fox in the henhouse, is a bit naive, no?

There is no way the model providers will allow wrapper-companies to take margin they think they can capture themselves. The model providers will absorb all potentially profitable use cases as they emerge. Weird how the entire ecosystem of start-ups doesn't see this.

This is actually wild! Established companies are heavily invested in Figma and will be slow to migrate, but new startups are side-stepping Figma account setup entirely in favor of Claude Design and AI workflows that no longer require cumbersome handoffs.

as a product designer, after trying CD, went to conclusion that I’m in the N Need Figma Anymore -NNFA bucket. it creates Design Systems, collab work, export in a more capable format than .fig now, CD is not mine, if like Fable, they kill it, I have no tools left

Not terribly surprising. Product companies who "partner" with platforms (AI or otherwise) should never bank on or trust that those platforms will simply rely on the partner to deliver said feature(s). If it's popular enough, the platform company will do what's best for their biz.

AI reporter? Tf? Bro hire an actual reporter don't be lazy .

Telling partners it would be basic then shipping something way more capable is a trust problem. Figma and Canva had roadmaps built around that expectation.

Fable was creating too much slop. It had to be stopped.

Claude Design has its uses but to praise it as some final boss level tool is conjecture. It knows what a design system looks like, it does not know when a design is good.

I've gotten to the point that I wait 15-30 days to try out the new tools. When I got to design it was so much more than I was expecting. Thought it would be a version of Lovable. Wow was I wrong. Now I wonder how Lovable has the valuation it has. Are the investors in AI not looking at the competing tools?

hey try to diem me first

Figma and Canva were naive to think Claude would slow down instead of racing ahead to absorb the entire software world.

Tokenmaxxing is a problem for many enterprises and thats happening in subsidized cost, actual cost is yet to come post IPO when they r forced to show profits. Some will use it but majority will continue to use figma, Canva n Adobe. Anthropic can NEVER be trusted.

Not surprising. When capability expands quickly, roadmaps change faster than partnership assumptions.

A pattern of not consistently candid...

Omg stop already enough with that "shits too powerful" talk bitches

Ethicsmaxxing again


