Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

ANTHROPIC'S LEAD ENGINEER LEAKED A $1.2M SYSTEM THAT TURNS ONE ENGINEER INTO A FLEET OF 10 LOOPS your hands were the bottleneck all along - here are 8 steps that change that stop writing, start delegating - loop: feature, loop: bugfix, loop: tests - each runs independently and ships...

Sprytixl's profile picture

Sprytix

5,711 subscribers

61,481 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

ANTHROPIC LEAKED 6 RULES THAT RUN 8 LOOPS AT ONCE - AND ONE ENGINEER DOES THE WORK OF A TEAM one engineer with this system replaces an entire team - and costs the company 8 times less You → Opus 5 plan → Fable 5 ×8 execute → Fable 5 review → you: 5 min Opus 5 takes your intent and breaks it into subtasks - a bad plan multiplied across every loop gives the same number of disasters - the plan is the only thing you read carefully one repo - isolated worktrees for each loop - nobody stands on anyone's file - parallel PRs ship while you do nothing the agent runs the tests and fixes until green PR - a red build never reaches your eyes one CLAUDE.md for the whole fleet - without it you get different opinions from every loop and one merge hell the average engineer closes 3-4 tasks a day - this system closes a full sprint overnight with zero working hours Fable 5 pre-reviews every PR before it reaches you - you spend 5 minutes - your throughput is now measured in diffs read per hour bookmark and paste into Claude Code - your first fleet can start tonight
1:15

ANTHROPIC LEAKED 6 RULES THAT RUN 8 LOOPS AT ONCE - AND ONE ENGINEER DOES THE WORK OF A TEAM one engineer with this system replaces an entire team - and costs the company 8 times less You → Opus 5 plan → Fable 5 ×8 execute → Fable 5 review → you: 5 min Opus 5 takes your intent and breaks it into subtasks - a bad plan multiplied across every loop gives the same number of disasters - the plan is the only thing you read carefully one repo - isolated worktrees for each loop - nobody stands on anyone's file - parallel PRs ship while you do nothing the agent runs the tests and fixes until green PR - a red build never reaches your eyes one CLAUDE.md for the whole fleet - without it you get different opinions from every loop and one merge hell the average engineer closes 3-4 tasks a day - this system closes a full sprint overnight with zero working hours Fable 5 pre-reviews every PR before it reaches you - you spend 5 minutes - your throughput is now measured in diffs read per hour bookmark and paste into Claude Code - your first fleet can start tonight

Sprytix

37,904 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

ANTHROPIC LEAD ENGINEER MAKING $2.3M/YEAR JUST LEAKED A 12-PAGE DOCUMENT - AND GOT FIRED 15 MINUTES AFTER PUBLISHING most developers build loops - but almost every loop breaks in one of five ways, and each failure has a symptom visible from the outside without reading a single line of code > Blind loop - the agent waits for a human to hand it work every morning - automating execution but not discovery > Tangled loop - parallel agents share one directory and overwrite each other parallelism that destroys instead of multiplies > Nodding loop - the agent grades its own work and approves it every time a loop that has never said no to itself is broken > Amnesiac loop - results live only in the context window every morning the system wakes up with no memory of yesterday > Manual loop - no trigger a human presses the button to start it that is not a loop that is a script waiting for a person a real loop finds its own work - remembers what it did has something that can say no never lets two agents touch the same file and fires itself on a timer remove any one of the five - and the loop either breaks or never starts 12 pages that changed how I build agentic systems today
0:50

ANTHROPIC LEAD ENGINEER MAKING $2.3M/YEAR JUST LEAKED A 12-PAGE DOCUMENT - AND GOT FIRED 15 MINUTES AFTER PUBLISHING most developers build loops - but almost every loop breaks in one of five ways, and each failure has a symptom visible from the outside without reading a single line of code > Blind loop - the agent waits for a human to hand it work every morning - automating execution but not discovery > Tangled loop - parallel agents share one directory and overwrite each other parallelism that destroys instead of multiplies > Nodding loop - the agent grades its own work and approves it every time a loop that has never said no to itself is broken > Amnesiac loop - results live only in the context window every morning the system wakes up with no memory of yesterday > Manual loop - no trigger a human presses the button to start it that is not a loop that is a script waiting for a person a real loop finds its own work - remembers what it did has something that can say no never lets two agents touch the same file and fires itself on a timer remove any one of the five - and the loop either breaks or never starts 12 pages that changed how I build agentic systems today

Sprytix

153,908 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

ANTHROPIC'S LEAD ENGINEER WON A $1.2M BONUS FOR A SYSTEM THAT TURNS ANY DATA CHAOS INTO A GRAPH IN 8 STEPS raw chaos in - self-updating graph out - and the agent gets +42% productivity from day one Load → Extract → Graph → Index → Query → Memory → Swarm → Update eight steps, one pipeline, graph grows while you sleep documents, code, Slack - everything into one stream through Claude Code - nothing gets lost Fable 5 + Opus 5 extracts entity relationships - Neo4j builds a live structure - zero duplicates three types of search in one answer - vectors, keywords and graph - merged ranking gives accuracy no RAG delivers alone a nightly agent pulls new data and updates the graph automatically - the system gets smarter while you sleep bookmark and paste into Claude Code - a $1.2M system now free
0:53

ANTHROPIC'S LEAD ENGINEER WON A $1.2M BONUS FOR A SYSTEM THAT TURNS ANY DATA CHAOS INTO A GRAPH IN 8 STEPS raw chaos in - self-updating graph out - and the agent gets +42% productivity from day one Load → Extract → Graph → Index → Query → Memory → Swarm → Update eight steps, one pipeline, graph grows while you sleep documents, code, Slack - everything into one stream through Claude Code - nothing gets lost Fable 5 + Opus 5 extracts entity relationships - Neo4j builds a live structure - zero duplicates three types of search in one answer - vectors, keywords and graph - merged ranking gives accuracy no RAG delivers alone a nightly agent pulls new data and updates the graph automatically - the system gets smarter while you sleep bookmark and paste into Claude Code - a $1.2M system now free

Sprytix

485,749 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Ex-Google engineer built a graph-based workflow that made Claude Code do nearly 10 days of work in about an hour. Here's the exact setup he uses. step 1. create a separate Git worktree for every task. run: git worktree add ../task-1 -b task-1 open a new terminal, cd into it, and launch Claude Code. repeat this for every agent. each one gets its own branch, so nothing conflicts. step 2. give every Claude agent a different task. same repository. different branches. they all work in parallel. step 3. once they're done, review the pull requests. keep the good ones. merge what works. step 4. add a review agent. paste each PR into Claude and ask: "does this implementation match the original specification" every agent now has another agent reviewing its work before it gets merged. step 5. scale it up. 48GB of RAM can comfortably run around 20 Claude Code agents. 128GB can handle roughly 50. most engineers run Claude Code once and wait. he runs dozens of Claude Code agents in parallel, then merges the best results. this 60-minute lecture is one of the best free resources on graph engineering and multi-agent workflows. bookmark it and watch it below.
55:30

Ex-Google engineer built a graph-based workflow that made Claude Code do nearly 10 days of work in about an hour. Here's the exact setup he uses. step 1. create a separate Git worktree for every task. run: git worktree add ../task-1 -b task-1 open a new terminal, cd into it, and launch Claude Code. repeat this for every agent. each one gets its own branch, so nothing conflicts. step 2. give every Claude agent a different task. same repository. different branches. they all work in parallel. step 3. once they're done, review the pull requests. keep the good ones. merge what works. step 4. add a review agent. paste each PR into Claude and ask: "does this implementation match the original specification" every agent now has another agent reviewing its work before it gets merged. step 5. scale it up. 48GB of RAM can comfortably run around 20 Claude Code agents. 128GB can handle roughly 50. most engineers run Claude Code once and wait. he runs dozens of Claude Code agents in parallel, then merges the best results. this 60-minute lecture is one of the best free resources on graph engineering and multi-agent workflows. bookmark it and watch it below.

MIKE

32,199 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

THE ANATOMY OF A SECOND BRAIN THAT WRITES ITSELF one Obsidian vault, three layers, and a loop that files every good answer back into a wiki you never touch the structure: > CLAUDE.md + AGENTS.md - the constitution. same rules whether Claude or Codex runs the loop > raw/ - inbox, articles, assets. frozen and read-only, you feed it and walk away > wiki/ - index.md, entities/, concepts/, synthesis.md. the agent grows this on its own > log.md - append-only, every move timestamped 47 sources in -> 210 pages out the agent typed 96% of it. you typed zero the cost trick: point Opus 5 only at synthesis.md, the one file that needs frontier reasoning. everything else runs fine on cheaper models under the hood it's loop engineering: you ask -> a good answer gets filed back -> the wiki grows start linking entities to each other and you're one step from a full graph your research compounds while you sleep. the full blueprint is below 👇
0:24

THE ANATOMY OF A SECOND BRAIN THAT WRITES ITSELF one Obsidian vault, three layers, and a loop that files every good answer back into a wiki you never touch the structure: > CLAUDE.md + AGENTS.md - the constitution. same rules whether Claude or Codex runs the loop > raw/ - inbox, articles, assets. frozen and read-only, you feed it and walk away > wiki/ - index.md, entities/, concepts/, synthesis.md. the agent grows this on its own > log.md - append-only, every move timestamped 47 sources in -> 210 pages out the agent typed 96% of it. you typed zero the cost trick: point Opus 5 only at synthesis.md, the one file that needs frontier reasoning. everything else runs fine on cheaper models under the hood it's loop engineering: you ask -> a good answer gets filed back -> the wiki grows start linking entities to each other and you're one step from a full graph your research compounds while you sleep. the full blueprint is below 👇

Annatar.md

23,649 просмотров • 12 дней назад

Anthropic just dropped 1-hour workshop on loop engineering: 1 spec → the loop → 200 features from 0% to 100%: • 10% → 5:31 - Building memory for agentic loops • 30% → 8:22 - Four files for each Loop: features.json, standards.md, progress.md, • 55% → 11:02 - The Loop: check environment → run tests → pick feature → build → test → commit • 80% → 13:06 - one feature per loop. try everything at once and context dies mid-build • 100% → 33:03 - MVP in 1 hour, every next loop under 30 minutes most people build an agent that finishes a task -Anthropic ships agentic loops that can run for days without you. watch it today - then read the full loop engineering playbook below ↓
42:20

Anthropic just dropped 1-hour workshop on loop engineering: 1 spec → the loop → 200 features from 0% to 100%: • 10% → 5:31 - Building memory for agentic loops • 30% → 8:22 - Four files for each Loop: features.json, standards.md, progress.md, • 55% → 11:02 - The Loop: check environment → run tests → pick feature → build → test → commit • 80% → 13:06 - one feature per loop. try everything at once and context dies mid-build • 100% → 33:03 - MVP in 1 hour, every next loop under 30 minutes most people build an agent that finishes a task -Anthropic ships agentic loops that can run for days without you. watch it today - then read the full loop engineering playbook below ↓

Codez

18,398 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

ANTHROPIC LEAKED ONE FILE WORTH $3.4M WHERE 7 WORKERS BUILD AN AI COMPANY IN 24 HOURS you hire nobody - you paste in 1 file and get 7 roles across three shifts with zero onboarding. scout → architect → builders ×3 → critic → scribe → night crew → chief → back into the file the scout goes through mail, tickets and news - and has the agenda ready before you sit down at the desk. the architect cuts the work into a task graph and holds the decisions - 3 builders run on parallel branches. the critic checks every diff before you ever open one - you're no longer the first to see the mistake. the scribe closes the docs and the changelog - the thing you postponed for 3 years now happens daily, without you. the night crew takes the long jobs and the research - the ones that never fit inside an 8-hour day. the chief rolls up the metrics, writes the morning report, and is the only one of the 7 allowed to write back into the file. that one back edge is what turns a pile of assistants into a company - tomorrow's rules get written tonight. every shift hands the next one a finished artefact - nothing gets re-derived from scratch. you work 8 hours, the fleet works 16, 7 roles and zero onboarding. save this and paste it into Claude Code - and your company stops idling ↓
0:58

ANTHROPIC LEAKED ONE FILE WORTH $3.4M WHERE 7 WORKERS BUILD AN AI COMPANY IN 24 HOURS you hire nobody - you paste in 1 file and get 7 roles across three shifts with zero onboarding. scout → architect → builders ×3 → critic → scribe → night crew → chief → back into the file the scout goes through mail, tickets and news - and has the agenda ready before you sit down at the desk. the architect cuts the work into a task graph and holds the decisions - 3 builders run on parallel branches. the critic checks every diff before you ever open one - you're no longer the first to see the mistake. the scribe closes the docs and the changelog - the thing you postponed for 3 years now happens daily, without you. the night crew takes the long jobs and the research - the ones that never fit inside an 8-hour day. the chief rolls up the metrics, writes the morning report, and is the only one of the 7 allowed to write back into the file. that one back edge is what turns a pile of assistants into a company - tomorrow's rules get written tonight. every shift hands the next one a finished artefact - nothing gets re-derived from scratch. you work 8 hours, the fleet works 16, 7 roles and zero onboarding. save this and paste it into Claude Code - and your company stops idling ↓

Noisy

50,907 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Creator of agent loops: "Anthropic also using my agent systems formula and still the biggest mistake in agents: is skipping Graphs" his 3 rules for every agent: rule 1 → loop it, don't run once - think, act, observe, repeat - cut the context and it forgets why it started rule 2 → an agent is memory + tools + reasoning - drop one and it breaks rule 3 → stop fine-tuning the model - the real alpha is the infrastructure around it the formula behind every AI agent - explained by the one who wrote it one agent → a loop → a graph of loops → a system that never forgets watch & bookmark - then read how to wire it into a graph ↓
45:37

Creator of agent loops: "Anthropic also using my agent systems formula and still the biggest mistake in agents: is skipping Graphs" his 3 rules for every agent: rule 1 → loop it, don't run once - think, act, observe, repeat - cut the context and it forgets why it started rule 2 → an agent is memory + tools + reasoning - drop one and it breaks rule 3 → stop fine-tuning the model - the real alpha is the infrastructure around it the formula behind every AI agent - explained by the one who wrote it one agent → a loop → a graph of loops → a system that never forgets watch & bookmark - then read how to wire it into a graph ↓

codila

23,915 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

LOOPS VS GRAPHS: THE ONE DISTINCTION THAT GETS YOU PROMOTED IN 2026 ask ten engineers running Claude which one they're using. eight won't know. that's the gap. > loop - you set the frame, the agent finds the path. best when nobody knows the route yet > graph - you draw the path, the agent fills each node. best when it's the same job every day loops flex. you can't test them. graphs test clean. but the map has to exist first. skip the company brain - tickets, policy, docs - and the agent relearns your business every run Fable 5 for the messy loop. Opus 4.8 for the daily graph - frontier tier, cheaper, runs all day. freeze a loop into a graph the second it stops surprising you say that once in a planning meeting and you've stopped doing tickets. you're designing the system which one is your setup actually running on?
0:23

LOOPS VS GRAPHS: THE ONE DISTINCTION THAT GETS YOU PROMOTED IN 2026 ask ten engineers running Claude which one they're using. eight won't know. that's the gap. > loop - you set the frame, the agent finds the path. best when nobody knows the route yet > graph - you draw the path, the agent fills each node. best when it's the same job every day loops flex. you can't test them. graphs test clean. but the map has to exist first. skip the company brain - tickets, policy, docs - and the agent relearns your business every run Fable 5 for the messy loop. Opus 4.8 for the daily graph - frontier tier, cheaper, runs all day. freeze a loop into a graph the second it stops surprising you say that once in a planning meeting and you've stopped doing tickets. you're designing the system which one is your setup actually running on?

Mr. Buzzoni

25,638 просмотров • 26 дней назад

While AI timeline argues about loop engineering, a 20-year-old student in Shenzhen built the biggest loop anyone's aimed at money: 300 agents, one brain, $1,200 -> 395,000. Not a prompt. Not a bot. A loop that runs the whole job on its own - and never asks him a thing. No fund. No backers. Just a laptop, a dorm room, and a bet that a swarm beats a genius. His wallet: The smartest single model still works one step at a time. His loop moves in 300 directions at once - and never checks in with him. Claude Opus 4.8 runs the floor as the brain. 300 agents are the hands. One loop ties them together: > Decompose - Opus breaks the market into targets > Dispatch - 300 agents scatter across them at once > Execute - thousands of reads in a single pass, not one by one > Review - Opus grades every edge before a cent moves The hands find. The brain judges. The loop learns what failed and runs again, tighter each time. One daily loss cap, and it shuts itself down. It's not a bot you babysit. It's a loop that runs the whole desk. Everyone's just learning to run one loop. He runs 300 in one. The edge was never the genius model - it's the size of the loop, and the brain in charge of it. Save this - the full 300-agent loop is laid out above, start to finish. You'll want it when you build your own. 300 agents are looping right now, hunting the markets everyone skips. Two clicks and their trades land in your wallet too:
0:53

While AI timeline argues about loop engineering, a 20-year-old student in Shenzhen built the biggest loop anyone's aimed at money: 300 agents, one brain, $1,200 -> 395,000. Not a prompt. Not a bot. A loop that runs the whole job on its own - and never asks him a thing. No fund. No backers. Just a laptop, a dorm room, and a bet that a swarm beats a genius. His wallet: The smartest single model still works one step at a time. His loop moves in 300 directions at once - and never checks in with him. Claude Opus 4.8 runs the floor as the brain. 300 agents are the hands. One loop ties them together: > Decompose - Opus breaks the market into targets > Dispatch - 300 agents scatter across them at once > Execute - thousands of reads in a single pass, not one by one > Review - Opus grades every edge before a cent moves The hands find. The brain judges. The loop learns what failed and runs again, tighter each time. One daily loss cap, and it shuts itself down. It's not a bot you babysit. It's a loop that runs the whole desk. Everyone's just learning to run one loop. He runs 300 in one. The edge was never the genius model - it's the size of the loop, and the brain in charge of it. Save this - the full 300-agent loop is laid out above, start to finish. You'll want it when you build your own. 300 agents are looping right now, hunting the markets everyone skips. Two clicks and their trades land in your wallet too:

cvxv666

53,282 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

FABLE 5 BUILT ME AN AGENT THAT CUT MY WORKDAY FROM 8 HOURS TO 15 MINUTES 6 stages, one loop, runs without me: Triage → Conductor → Worker → Verifier → Gate → Trust Ledger finds the task itself, breaks it into steps in seconds, writes the code, checks the result, passes or rejects, records and learns 3 out of 4 tasks passed first try - the system knows where it failed and fixes it 8 hours of work → 15 minutes of watching Fable 5, pure HTML and JS, zero external libraries - and an agent that never stops
0:44

FABLE 5 BUILT ME AN AGENT THAT CUT MY WORKDAY FROM 8 HOURS TO 15 MINUTES 6 stages, one loop, runs without me: Triage → Conductor → Worker → Verifier → Gate → Trust Ledger finds the task itself, breaks it into steps in seconds, writes the code, checks the result, passes or rejects, records and learns 3 out of 4 tasks passed first try - the system knows where it failed and fixes it 8 hours of work → 15 minutes of watching Fable 5, pure HTML and JS, zero external libraries - and an agent that never stops

Noisy

98,722 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

PROMPTS ARE DEAD. LOOPS JUST REPLACED YOUR $200K ENGINEER. Claire Vo showed how to turn one prompt into a self-running loop. It reviews your aging pull requests every morning and hunts for new skills every week. And it spins up its own subagents to check its own work. Runs on Claude Code + Codex. One afternoon. One prompt. The numbers are insane: - Senior doing code review: $200K/year - Automation engineer: $150K/year - This setup: about $200/month - Time to build: one afternoon - Skill required: describe the job like you are onboarding a hire The opportunity is even wilder: Teams pay people to babysit pull requests and chase stale reviews. The loop does it itself at 10:15 a.m., alerts the team, and validates itself with subagents. An agency would charge thousands to wire this up. One person + Claude Code + Codex + one prompt = an engineering team that reviews code and finds new skills while you sleep. Save and watch the clip.
29:06

PROMPTS ARE DEAD. LOOPS JUST REPLACED YOUR $200K ENGINEER. Claire Vo showed how to turn one prompt into a self-running loop. It reviews your aging pull requests every morning and hunts for new skills every week. And it spins up its own subagents to check its own work. Runs on Claude Code + Codex. One afternoon. One prompt. The numbers are insane: - Senior doing code review: $200K/year - Automation engineer: $150K/year - This setup: about $200/month - Time to build: one afternoon - Skill required: describe the job like you are onboarding a hire The opportunity is even wilder: Teams pay people to babysit pull requests and chase stale reviews. The loop does it itself at 10:15 a.m., alerts the team, and validates itself with subagents. An agency would charge thousands to wire this up. One person + Claude Code + Codex + one prompt = an engineering team that reviews code and finds new skills while you sleep. Save and watch the clip.

shmidt

51,155 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

ANTHROPIC LEAKED A SETUP WHERE ONE FILE STARTS 7 LOOPS THAT TURN A PROMPT INTO A WORKING BUSINESS AI engineer drops in 1 file - the other 95% of the work closes automatically without them. spec → tasks → code → tests → docs → release → monitoring → back into the spec you don't write tickets anymore - you write the thing tickets get derived from, and Opus 5 cuts the spec into 6 tasks by itself. a task that fails its test comes back to itself, not to you - and runs a second lap without a single notification. 6 lanes of code run in parallel and none of them wait on you - the critic filters the diff before you ever open it. every new production bug becomes a permanent line in the eval set - the system never steps on it twice. monitoring isn't the end of the line, it's the start of the next spec - those back edges are what make it a graph instead of a conveyor. and one place is left where you say yes - release, 5 minutes instead of 5 hours. save this and paste it into Claude Code - and you get 7 loops that run without you ↓
0:52

ANTHROPIC LEAKED A SETUP WHERE ONE FILE STARTS 7 LOOPS THAT TURN A PROMPT INTO A WORKING BUSINESS AI engineer drops in 1 file - the other 95% of the work closes automatically without them. spec → tasks → code → tests → docs → release → monitoring → back into the spec you don't write tickets anymore - you write the thing tickets get derived from, and Opus 5 cuts the spec into 6 tasks by itself. a task that fails its test comes back to itself, not to you - and runs a second lap without a single notification. 6 lanes of code run in parallel and none of them wait on you - the critic filters the diff before you ever open it. every new production bug becomes a permanent line in the eval set - the system never steps on it twice. monitoring isn't the end of the line, it's the start of the next spec - those back edges are what make it a graph instead of a conveyor. and one place is left where you say yes - release, 5 minutes instead of 5 hours. save this and paste it into Claude Code - and you get 7 loops that run without you ↓

Sprytix

66,333 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

ANTHROPIC SPENT $2.3M ON A LOOP MANUAL WITH 7 PRINCIPLES THAT TURN AN AGENT INTO A MULTI-TASK ASSISTANT 4 years of development and 1000+ hours of lectures - now anyone can launch an agent that earns instead of falls Simplicity → Tool Design → Evaluation → Disclosure → Orchestration → Stop Conditions start with the simplest solution - one call x1, workflow x4, agent x15 - most tasks never needed an agent at all 60% of failures come from a tool written vaguely - clear parameters complete the task that vague ones stop the agent generates, grades itself and returns with notes if wrong - without this the first answer is always the final one 50 tools in context and the agent gets confused - give it 3 relevant ones and it completes the task Opus 5 plans, Fable 5 executes in parallel - parallelism wins only when subtasks do not depend on each other without a turn limit the agent can burn $10,000 overnight and you find out in the morning when nothing can be changed bookmark & paste into Claude Code today - tomorrow the agent earns instead of falls
0:48

ANTHROPIC SPENT $2.3M ON A LOOP MANUAL WITH 7 PRINCIPLES THAT TURN AN AGENT INTO A MULTI-TASK ASSISTANT 4 years of development and 1000+ hours of lectures - now anyone can launch an agent that earns instead of falls Simplicity → Tool Design → Evaluation → Disclosure → Orchestration → Stop Conditions start with the simplest solution - one call x1, workflow x4, agent x15 - most tasks never needed an agent at all 60% of failures come from a tool written vaguely - clear parameters complete the task that vague ones stop the agent generates, grades itself and returns with notes if wrong - without this the first answer is always the final one 50 tools in context and the agent gets confused - give it 3 relevant ones and it completes the task Opus 5 plans, Fable 5 executes in parallel - parallelism wins only when subtasks do not depend on each other without a turn limit the agent can burn $10,000 overnight and you find out in the morning when nothing can be changed bookmark & paste into Claude Code today - tomorrow the agent earns instead of falls

Sprytix

27,543 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

ANTHROPIC LEAKED 8 RULES THAT GIVE ONE ENGINEER 8X FROM A SINGLE CHANGE the engineers built it so nothing adds up - it multiplies, and that's the 8x task → split → verify → score → write back one queue means you wait for every step in turn - three workers together cost you the slowest one, not the sum of all. as long as you're the one reading the diff, the bottleneck is you, not the model. state is written at every step - a crash mid-run costs you one step, not the whole session. history gets compressed 25 times over - the next pass starts at 8k instead of 200k. nothing moves forward without a number - "it got better" isn't a result, and the breakage comes back when you're no longer watching. the eighth rule is the only one that writes back into CLAUDE.md - the agent records what it learned, and the next run doesn't start from zero. copy this into Claude Code today - and tomorrow you work like an engineer on $1.5M a year ↓
1:05

ANTHROPIC LEAKED 8 RULES THAT GIVE ONE ENGINEER 8X FROM A SINGLE CHANGE the engineers built it so nothing adds up - it multiplies, and that's the 8x task → split → verify → score → write back one queue means you wait for every step in turn - three workers together cost you the slowest one, not the sum of all. as long as you're the one reading the diff, the bottleneck is you, not the model. state is written at every step - a crash mid-run costs you one step, not the whole session. history gets compressed 25 times over - the next pass starts at 8k instead of 200k. nothing moves forward without a number - "it got better" isn't a result, and the breakage comes back when you're no longer watching. the eighth rule is the only one that writes back into CLAUDE.md - the agent records what it learned, and the next run doesn't start from zero. copy this into Claude Code today - and tomorrow you work like an engineer on $1.5M a year ↓

Noisy

37,450 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

The creator of Claude Code deleted his IDE in November 2024. In the last 30 days, 100% of his contributions were written by Claude Code. 259 PRs. His job is not prompting anymore. His job is writing loops that prompt Claude for him. Here is what that progression actually looks like: → stage 1: write code by hand with autocomplete → stage 2: run 5-10 claude sessions in parallel, prompt each one yourself → stage 3: write loops that prompt claude — you become the author, the model becomes a subroutine → the ralph loop (2025): bash one-liner, fixed anchor files, built a programming language for $297 → the 2026 loop: loops supervising loops, scheduling on infrastructure time, git-backed durable state → five building blocks: automations, durable state, validator split, loop orchestration, crash recovery Most developers are still in stage 2, prompting sessions by hand. The ones at stage 3 are writing the loops that do the prompting for them. Read this article to be ahead of the curve! Follow NeilXbt for more AI engineering intelligence that shows you exactly where the leverage moved and what building at that level actually looks like.
1:00

The creator of Claude Code deleted his IDE in November 2024. In the last 30 days, 100% of his contributions were written by Claude Code. 259 PRs. His job is not prompting anymore. His job is writing loops that prompt Claude for him. Here is what that progression actually looks like: → stage 1: write code by hand with autocomplete → stage 2: run 5-10 claude sessions in parallel, prompt each one yourself → stage 3: write loops that prompt claude — you become the author, the model becomes a subroutine → the ralph loop (2025): bash one-liner, fixed anchor files, built a programming language for $297 → the 2026 loop: loops supervising loops, scheduling on infrastructure time, git-backed durable state → five building blocks: automations, durable state, validator split, loop orchestration, crash recovery Most developers are still in stage 2, prompting sessions by hand. The ones at stage 3 are writing the loops that do the prompting for them. Read this article to be ahead of the curve! Follow NeilXbt for more AI engineering intelligence that shows you exactly where the leverage moved and what building at that level actually looks like.

NeilXbt

11,556 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

ANTHROPIC LEAKED A 6-LOOP SETUP THAT REPLACES A $3,000 AGENCY AND COSTS $59 A MONTH Microsoft and Google have been running this for a while - the gap against an agency is exactly 51x. an agency charged you for waiting, not for work - the brief walked from the strategist to the copywriter to the designer for weeks. here all 6 loops read one file on the same pass - there's nobody to wait on, and the calendar is empty. 51% of the bill is production on Sonnet 5, and only 5% is strategy on Opus 5 - the priciest model runs once a week. 22% of the whole bill sits on the batch queue at half rate - where nobody is waiting for an answer right now. the journal is the only loop that writes back into the root - which angle is dead, and next week starts tighter. the 6 loops bring you 3 angles a week - the final pick stays yours, and that's the part that never automates. save this and paste it into Claude Code - the loops remove the waiting, not the judgement ↓
2:48

ANTHROPIC LEAKED A 6-LOOP SETUP THAT REPLACES A $3,000 AGENCY AND COSTS $59 A MONTH Microsoft and Google have been running this for a while - the gap against an agency is exactly 51x. an agency charged you for waiting, not for work - the brief walked from the strategist to the copywriter to the designer for weeks. here all 6 loops read one file on the same pass - there's nobody to wait on, and the calendar is empty. 51% of the bill is production on Sonnet 5, and only 5% is strategy on Opus 5 - the priciest model runs once a week. 22% of the whole bill sits on the batch queue at half rate - where nobody is waiting for an answer right now. the journal is the only loop that writes back into the root - which angle is dead, and next week starts tighter. the 6 loops bring you 3 angles a week - the final pick stays yours, and that's the part that never automates. save this and paste it into Claude Code - the loops remove the waiting, not the judgement ↓

Noisy

10,557 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Andrew Ng just released a free 2-hour course on complete Graph Engineering How to go from one prompt to 100 agents that loop, improve, and run without you: 09:14 - Build your first AI agent 33:11 - Run agents with loop engineering 1:02:46 - Turn agent loops into graphs 1:30:15 - Build agents that rewrite themselves 1:49:05 - Run the full graph system without you Most people are still building one agent and calling it finished Andrew Ng is already teaching everything that comes next: Prompt → Agents → Loops → Graphs → Self-Improving Systems Single agents are the old workflow Systems that improve and run without you are the next one This 2-hour course is worth more than most $500 agent engineering programs Bookmark it and watch before everyone catches up Then read how to run 1,000 agents from one prompt below ↓
1:51:29

Andrew Ng just released a free 2-hour course on complete Graph Engineering How to go from one prompt to 100 agents that loop, improve, and run without you: 09:14 - Build your first AI agent 33:11 - Run agents with loop engineering 1:02:46 - Turn agent loops into graphs 1:30:15 - Build agents that rewrite themselves 1:49:05 - Run the full graph system without you Most people are still building one agent and calling it finished Andrew Ng is already teaching everything that comes next: Prompt → Agents → Loops → Graphs → Self-Improving Systems Single agents are the old workflow Systems that improve and run without you are the next one This 2-hour course is worth more than most $500 agent engineering programs Bookmark it and watch before everyone catches up Then read how to run 1,000 agents from one prompt below ↓

reira

14,729 просмотров • 24 дней назад

ANTHROPIC LEAKED A $3.4M FILE THAT GIVES YOU A $120K/MONTH ENGINEERING TEAM IN 10 MINUTES AND BUILDS ANY SYSTEM Microsoft and Google have been using this file for a while - 5 roles, zero hires, and it costs $0. in 10 minutes the whole system is up: core, skills, contracts, tests, cron and a team already working. all of it rests on the root you write: who buys, what it costs, what the team never does, and one metric. Sonnet 5 brings up the core and wires the skills, Opus 5 splits the task and judges the result, Haiku 4.5 assembles the report on the batch queue. contracts get written before the workers - without them every hop re-guesses what the last one meant. with contracts the same object travels between all 5 roles: SETUP.md → skeleton → task graph → gate → report. the critic is the gate - nothing ships past it, which is why you never get a green build with dead logic. the auditor writes one line back into the root - tomorrow's team is better than today's, and you opened nothing. without that edge you don't have a loop, you have 5 scripts repeating monday for a year. 4 typed handoffs and 1 return - the whole system rests on those five arrows. save this and paste it into Claude Code - 10 minutes, 5 roles, zero hires ↓
1:47

ANTHROPIC LEAKED A $3.4M FILE THAT GIVES YOU A $120K/MONTH ENGINEERING TEAM IN 10 MINUTES AND BUILDS ANY SYSTEM Microsoft and Google have been using this file for a while - 5 roles, zero hires, and it costs $0. in 10 minutes the whole system is up: core, skills, contracts, tests, cron and a team already working. all of it rests on the root you write: who buys, what it costs, what the team never does, and one metric. Sonnet 5 brings up the core and wires the skills, Opus 5 splits the task and judges the result, Haiku 4.5 assembles the report on the batch queue. contracts get written before the workers - without them every hop re-guesses what the last one meant. with contracts the same object travels between all 5 roles: SETUP.md → skeleton → task graph → gate → report. the critic is the gate - nothing ships past it, which is why you never get a green build with dead logic. the auditor writes one line back into the root - tomorrow's team is better than today's, and you opened nothing. without that edge you don't have a loop, you have 5 scripts repeating monday for a year. 4 typed handoffs and 1 return - the whole system rests on those five arrows. save this and paste it into Claude Code - 10 minutes, 5 roles, zero hires ↓

Noisy

19,483 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

ANTHROPIC LEAKED A FILE WHERE 10 BUSINESSES ASSEMBLE IN 24 HOURS, MAKE $100K + A MONTH AND COST $8 A DAY TOGETHER one of those 10 loops replaces a $2,000/month agency - and it runs for $1.80 a day. the routing never changes: Haiku at the door, Sonnet on the volume, Opus only where being wrong is expensive. Opus enters exactly 4 loops out of 10 - and in each of those four the mistake has a name: a fine, a misjudged tender, a missed contradiction, 21 drafts sold to nobody. the other 6 fail cheaply and just retry - that's the whole test for who gets the expensive model. competitive intel reads 200 pages for $0.40 and hands back one paragraph - a subscription to the same thing is $500 a month. lead scoring sees 300 signals and 12 get a real letter - the other 288 cost less than a cent between them. review monitoring runs at $0.35 and answers in 4 minutes - a human notices the same review 2 days later. the onboarding agent closes 38 questions out of 40 and hands 2 to a person - a loop that never escalates is a loop that's guessing. the compliance check finds the 4 lines that differ and rules on them for $1.50 - a consultant charges that per hour. all 10 together are $243 a month against the salaries they replace. save this and paste it into Claude Code - cheap at the door, expensive only where being wrong costs ↓
1:11

ANTHROPIC LEAKED A FILE WHERE 10 BUSINESSES ASSEMBLE IN 24 HOURS, MAKE $100K + A MONTH AND COST $8 A DAY TOGETHER one of those 10 loops replaces a $2,000/month agency - and it runs for $1.80 a day. the routing never changes: Haiku at the door, Sonnet on the volume, Opus only where being wrong is expensive. Opus enters exactly 4 loops out of 10 - and in each of those four the mistake has a name: a fine, a misjudged tender, a missed contradiction, 21 drafts sold to nobody. the other 6 fail cheaply and just retry - that's the whole test for who gets the expensive model. competitive intel reads 200 pages for $0.40 and hands back one paragraph - a subscription to the same thing is $500 a month. lead scoring sees 300 signals and 12 get a real letter - the other 288 cost less than a cent between them. review monitoring runs at $0.35 and answers in 4 minutes - a human notices the same review 2 days later. the onboarding agent closes 38 questions out of 40 and hands 2 to a person - a loop that never escalates is a loop that's guessing. the compliance check finds the 4 lines that differ and rules on them for $1.50 - a consultant charges that per hour. all 10 together are $243 a month against the salaries they replace. save this and paste it into Claude Code - cheap at the door, expensive only where being wrong costs ↓

Sprytix

12,603 просмотров • 1 месяц назад