Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
Anti-colonization but nationalists for colonial countries
63,707 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 27

@midnight_b65055 Tbh the people who hate syces pico (how ever it’s spelled) are not the same nationalists who hate other Arab countries

United Arab Republic-- it was Nasser's dream

Also worth noting there were attempts at unification between these states that were very short lived, or failed to get off the ground. The skyes picot nations have had effective autonomy for 80-95 years now.

ان تخلط بين القوميين والوحدويين زي ان تقول انو الايرلندي في IRA هو نفس الايرلندي الملكي من الغباء ان تخلط بين فصيلين وتعتبرهم نفس الشخص وتحاكم هذا الشخص التخيلي بأسئلة انتا محدد اجابتها عشان توصل لحكم قاصر بأننا متناقضين

Saudi Arabia was not even in this plan what are you talkin about

You are those ignorant communities that, unlike the Turks, do not fight for your own independence and are condemned to colonization. You are not even citizens of your own country. You consist merely of clans and tribes; if you do not wish to be like Christians, at least try to resemble us.

You are talking about two separate groups of people. The Pan Arabist and the Pan Islamist arabs are proponents of undoing the borders, whereas the Monarchists are pro Western Colonial borders, b/c ultimately they back the rule of their ruler placed by the british.

This is a generalisation fallacy, the best position is to stand for allowing people to choose for themselves (self-determination) via democratic referenda

Actually I think Lebanese in Tripoli would like the idea of merging with Syria

you've been on a roll👏

Today’s borders don’t have a whole lot to do with the Sykes-Picot lines

Sykes picot destroyed the levant and Iraq not the Arab world.

True………

The problem not with the physical borders, they built the borders inside of our hearts and souls. And built the national pride of the different nations. Hence u see im not arab im phenecian or asyrian

Depending on who you talk to to be honest. Pan islamic supporters actually want to end colonial borders while some nationalists don’t have a problem with borders per say, but with how they were actually drawn with no regard to ethnic and religious identities.

Yeah fuck the borders, Egypt and Sudan are one country. Same with Palestine, Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria. Same with Arabia, Yemen, Oman, Qatar, Same with Iraq and I'm sorry but same with Iran too

The malicious Persian couldn't find anything real to criticize Saudi Arabia with, so he resorted to "oil money." We are the ones who distribute the most oil money to Muslims, so what are you talking about? He's simply trying to claim that Saudis hate Palestinians, nothing more.

Yeah either way you don’t have anything to do with it Iranian pig Go worship fire

Start with Merging Saudi, UAE, Qatar, Bahrain, and Kuwait. Who says no? Merge Jordan into that too. Who says no? Or merge it with Syria. Who says no?

I don’t mind Yemen and Oman joining

Israel is the only REAL country Jordan is totally fake. You can call it Palestine we wouldn’t care less

The very concept of Iraqi nationalism is very funny to me

Never seen them arguing for it to be undone

merge morocco, algeria, and tunisia

I agree but tbf Oman has absolutely the best case for being its own country among them

I am a novice here, but I understand the Arabs of the Levant all speak and read the same dialect of Arabic. This reminds me of the Anglo world or perhaps the Hispanic world. You would think there would be a way to unite these peoples, but look what happened to Canada 51st state

Do you support a union between Iran, Afghanistan, and Tajikistan? No, my dear, those backward tribal mountain dwellers are nothing like us. We want to be Europeans.


