Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
Antisemitic Islamists...
423,781 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 11
💗♝ ℱ𝐋Ｏฬⓔ𝓡 Ｐ𝕆山𝔢𝓇 💲♖1 год назад
Good they should burn that satanic symbol
Julian Ruben Martinez1 год назад
That's jews actually doing the right thing
R053Y1 год назад
Being anti-israel is NOT being antisemitic
V.Woolf1 год назад
I claim them as my cousins.
justin o'flaherty1 год назад
Not antisemitism just anti Zionism! Judaism is a religion but Zionism is a bad dream!!
Elftown Community1 год назад
They sure like their infighting, but they hope others do the actual fighting for them.
Estadio Deportes1 год назад
¡UY! ESO DEBIÓ DOLER 😬 Nassourdine Imavov le propina su tercera derrota a Israel Adesanya. 😲¿Acaso no lo tomó en serio? 🤔 ESTADIO Deportes te cuenta qué pasó. #NassourdineImavov #IsraelAdesanya #UFC
Tim Beaver1 год назад
True practitioners of Judaism
Fashion Guru1 год назад
Good. Lovely scenes
ꪑꪖꪶi 🇸🇾 مالي1 год назад
💪🏽
Arleta Kozak 🌻🌏📚🦝🦈🍉1 год назад
😎✌
![At a campaign rally in Hamilton, Ontario, Liberal leader Mark Carney unveiled what can only be described as a coordinated assault on digital freedom in Canada. Behind the slogans, applause lines, and empty rhetoric about unity, one portion of Carney’s remarks stood out for its implications: a bold, unapologetic commitment to controlling online speech under the guise of “safety” and “misinformation.” “We announced a series of measures with respect to online harm… a sea of misogyny, anti-Semitism, hatred, conspiracy theories—the sort of pollution that's online that washes over our virtual borders from the United States.” He then made clear his intention to act: “My government, if we are elected, will be taking action on those American giants who come across [our] border.” The former central banker, who now postures as a man of the people, made it clear that if the Liberals are re-elected, the federal government will intensify efforts to regulate what Canadians are allowed to see, say, and share online. His language was deliberate. Carney condemned what he called a “sea of misogyny, anti-Semitism, hatred, conspiracy theories” polluting Canada’s internet space—language borrowed directly from the Trudeau-era playbook. But this wasn’t just a moral denunciation. It was a legislative preview. Carney spoke of a future Liberal government taking “action on those American giants who come across our borders.” Translation: he wants to bring Big Tech platforms under federal control, or at least force them to play the role of speech enforcers for the Canadian state. He blamed the United States for exporting “hate” into Canada, reinforcing the bizarre Liberal narrative that the greatest threat to national unity isn’t foreign actors like the CCP or radical Islamists—it’s Facebook memes and American podcasts. But the most revealing moment came when Carney linked online speech directly to violence. He asserted that digital “pollution” affects how Canadians behave in real life, specifically pointing to conjugal violence, antisemitism, and drug abuse. This is how the ground is prepared for censorship: first by tying speech to harm, then by criminalizing what the state deems harmful. What Carney didn’t say is just as important. He made no distinction between actual criminal incitement and political dissent. He offered no assurance that free expression—a right enshrined in Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms—would be respected. He provided no definition of what constitutes a “conspiracy theory” or who gets to make that determination. Under this framework, any criticism of government policy, of global institutions, or of the new technocratic order could be flagged, throttled, and punished. And that’s the point. Mark Carney isn’t interested in dialogue. He wants obedience. He doesn't trust Canadians to discern truth from fiction. He believes it’s the job of government—his government—to curate the national conversation, to protect citizens from wrongthink, to act as referee over what is and isn’t acceptable discourse. In short, he wants Ottawa to become the Ministry of Truth. Why They Don’t Actually Care About Antisemitism The Liberal establishment talks a big game about fighting hate—but when it comes to actual antisemitic violence, they’ve shown nothing but selective enforcement and political cowardice. Let’s look at the facts. In 2023, B’nai Brith Canada recorded nearly 6,000 antisemitic incidents, including 77 violent attacks—from firebombed synagogues to shots fired at Jewish schools in Montreal and Toronto. This wasn’t a marginal increase. It was a 208% spike in violent antisemitism in a single year. Statistics Canada echoed the same alarm bells. Jews—who make up just 1% of Canada’s population—were the victims of 70% of all religiously motivated hate crimes. That’s nearly 900 recorded incidents, up 71% from the previous year. Then came October 2023, when Hamas launched its attack on Israel—and the wave of hate turned into a tsunami: a 670% increase in antisemitic incidents across the country. Jewish schools, synagogues, and community centers were hit with bomb threats, arson attempts, and intimidation campaigns. This was a national security issue, not just a policing matter. And yet, the government's response? Virtually nonexistent. Case in point: the Montreal Riot, November 2024. A 600-person mob, waving anti-NATO and pro-Palestinian banners, turned violent—setting fires, smashing windows, and attacking police. Amid this chaos, a man was filmed screaming “Final Solution”—a direct reference to the Nazi plan to exterminate the Jews. It went viral. There was no ambiguity, no misunderstanding. It was a public call for genocide. So what happened? Three arrests. None for hate crimes. None related to antisemitism. Montreal Police Chief Fady Dagher insisted there were “no confirmed antisemitic acts,” and as of early 2025, no hate crime charges have been filed against the individual caught on camera. That man, as it turns out, owned a Second Cup franchise. His punishment? His café was shut down by the company. Not by law enforcement. Not by hate crime investigators. A corporate HR department showed more backbone than Canada’s justice system. And this is what reveals the truth: they don’t care. They’ll enforce hate speech laws when it’s politically convenient—when it can be used to silence critics, crush dissent, or placate woke constituencies. But when Jewish communities are being threatened, attacked, and terrorized? The same laws suddenly go limp. The same political class that claims to protect minorities becomes paralyzed. They won’t touch it. Because confronting real antisemitism would require standing up to their political allies in activist circles, university campuses, and radical protest movements. This isn't an accident. It's a pattern. The Liberals aren’t weak on antisemitism because they’re unaware of it. They’re weak on it because they don’t see political value in enforcing the law when it conflicts with their ideological allies. Their obsession isn’t with hate speech—it’s with controlling “wrong” speech. And what qualifies as “wrong” isn’t defined by law or principle. It’s defined by what the Liberal establishment deems unacceptable. Their target isn’t violent bigotry. It’s dissent. They’ll chase down citizens for questioning carbon taxes or criticizing globalist policy—but when Jewish schools get shot at, or someone calls for genocide in the street, they shrug. This isn’t leadership. It’s selective justice. And it proves, beyond any doubt, that their agenda was never about protecting Canadians. It was always about protecting control. The Online Harms Act: Carney’s Blueprint for Speech Control This isn’t hypothetical. Mark Carney’s remarks in Hamilton mirror the exact logic and intent behind the Online Harms Act (Bill C-63)—legislation drafted under the Liberal banner and introduced in 2024 that pushes Canada into territory no free society should accept. At its core, Bill C-63 hands the federal government sweeping powers to police digital speech. It creates a Digital Safety Commission, an unelected bureaucratic authority empowered to monitor, investigate, and punish online platforms and individuals for content deemed "harmful." That word—harmful—is never concretely defined. It includes things like “hate speech,” “conspiracy theories,” and vague notions of “harm to children,” but it’s written broadly enough to be used as a political weapon. The most chilling provision? Preemptive imprisonment. Under this law, Canadians could be jailed for up to a year—without having committed a crime—if a judge believes they might post something harmful in the future. This isn’t law enforcement. This is thought policing. Carney didn’t just echo this approach—he amplified it. In his Hamilton rally, he described the internet as being flooded with “misogyny, anti-Semitism, hatred, conspiracy theories,” and laid blame on foreign content “washing over our borders from the United States.” He didn’t argue for open debate or for empowering users to challenge dangerous ideas. He argued for the state to intervene and shut them down. He told Canadians that these ideas are “changing how people behave” and claimed his government will go after “those American giants” that allow this content to circulate. There’s no ambiguity here: this is a public declaration that a Liberal government under Mark Carney intends to censor, de-platform, and penalize dissenting views. Not illegal ones—just ones they don't like. And this isn’t new for him. Back in 2022, during the Freedom Convoy, Carney referred to protesters as committing “sedition” and demanded the government “thoroughly punish” them. These weren’t violent rioters or foreign agitators—these were working-class Canadians honking their horns and standing in the cold, protesting vaccine mandates. For Carney, their real crime was disobedience. Carney’s view of speech is simple: if it challenges the ruling order, it’s dangerous. And now, with Bill C-63 on the table and Carney at the helm, he’s building the legal infrastructure to lock down the digital public square—not to protect Canadians from violence, but to protect the Liberal establishment from criticism. That law is real. Carney’s agenda is real. And if he wins, enforcement is coming. Final thoughts This is the Canada Mark Carney envisions—one where citizens can’t speak freely online without first checking their views against government guidelines. A country where speech is no longer a right but a privilege granted by bureaucrats. A country where opposition isn’t argued with, it’s labeled harmful and erased. There was a time when Liberals championed civil liberties. That era is over. The new Liberalism is authoritarian—cloaked in the language of safety and inclusion, but animated by control. Carney’s rally in Hamilton wasn’t a policy rollout. It was a warning to anyone who still thinks they live in a country where dissent is allowed. They don’t want to fight hate. They want to define “wrong” speech—and then eliminate it. And by “wrong,” they mean anything the Liberal establishment disapproves of. Criticize the government, question the orthodoxy, challenge the state’s narrative, and you’ll be branded a threat. Not a citizen. Not a participant. A threat. So here we are. The speech laws are written. The censors are waiting. And Mark Carney is ready to pull the trigger. This election isn’t about tax credits or campaign slogans. It’s about whether Canada remains a free country or slides deeper into soft tyranny, one regulation, one commission, one silenced voice at a time. There is a choice. And the choice is this: bring it home—restore freedom, restore sanity, restore this country. Or: hand the keys to the same people who think you’re the problem for having the nerve to think for yourself.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1911016400912859219/amplify_video_thumb/1911015612068839424/img/frTZBF9wAo75ED79.jpg)
![🚨 Another online Islamist eruption This time, the employee accused of posting extremist, hateful content online has a taxpayer-funded gig! We have happened upon yet another online Islamist eruption, thanks to our whistleblower friends at Leviathan. Astute viewers of this channel are likely aware that we’ve exposed numerous Islamist reprobates openly and proudly venting their hate online. They were employed at companies ranging from Air Canada and Telus to Scotiabank and the Royal Bank. You may have noticed we used the past-tense. That’s because all those online keyboard warriors were justifiably shown the door. But let’s be honest: all of those aforementioned companies essentially did the right thing for the wrong reason. I.e., they were seemingly OK with turning a blind eye to these Islamists venting hatred and only did something tangible once the spectre of a public relations black eye was imminent. And now comes the latest example of yet another online antisemitic hater. But there’s a twist, given that this guy has a government job. Meet Ammar Rizvi, who is employed by the Regional Municipality of York Region in Newmarket, Ont., just north of Toronto. That’s right, your tax dollars are hard at work employing this guy. Which is problematic, given that he is an open supporter of the Islamic Republic of Iran, where he has been observed glorifying and mourning terrorist figures such as Ayatollah Khomeini, Ayatollah Khamenei, and senior IRGC member Qassem Soleimani. The IRGC is a designated terrorist entity in Canada and has Canadian blood on its hands after shooting down that Ukrainian airliner in January 2020. He is also a frequent attendee of the radical Al-Quds rally, including the one that took place in Toronto earlier this month. For some reason, Rizvi doesn’t care for Indians all that much. Rizvi dehumanizes members of the Hindu Indian community by calling them “jeets”, “pajeets” and “poopjeets.” He has stated the following in writing: “India managed to hold onto their pagan religion. And now they eat cow shit and drink cow piss.” Rizvi also mocks those in the Iranian diaspora. He labels all Iranian protesters as “everyone dead,” claiming a woman he knows in Iran is “the only one left alive.” And Rizvi calls Iranians protesting against the Islamic Republic “diasportards [who] keep crying.” Predictably, Rizvi uses slurs when referring to Israelis. He calls Israelis “Zios”, a derogatory term created by David Duke, the former head of the Ku Klux Klan, who related Zionism (i.e., the belief in Israel's existence) to “fascism, communism, [and] Nazism.” We’re sure Rizvi’s rants and his support of terrorism are of interest to the Iranian, Indian, Jewish, and Israeli communities, especially given that taxpayer dollars are funding his position within their municipality’s government. We reached out to Rizvi. He left us a voicemail stating he would provide a statement in writing via email. We haven’t received it, and we did reach out to him a few more times, but so far, it’s been radio silence. We also reached out to the media relations department of York Region via email and voicemail. Here were my questions: 1⃣. Is York Region aware of Rizvi’s postings? 2⃣. Are such posts a breach of York Region’s Code of Conduct? 3⃣. If so, is any action being taken regarding these posts? 4⃣. Of note, I saw that the most recent media release on your website is dated March 9, 2026 and is headlined: “York Region denounces violence targeting Jewish communities.” If this is the case, how is it ok for Rizvi to spew anti-Jew and anti-Israeli hate? By the way, that March 9th release about antisemitism in York Region features a raft of quotes attributed to Eric Jolliffe, the York Region Chairman and CEO. It states, in part, “On behalf of York Regional Council and the Regional Municipality of York, I am deeply troubled by the recent shootings targeting synagogues across the Greater Toronto Area, including one incident in the City of Vaughan. “Places of worship must be safe spaces for prayer, reflection and gathering. Acts of violence and intimidation directed at any faith community are unacceptable and have no place in York Region. These incidents are alarming and deeply distressing for members of the Jewish community and for residents across our cities and towns who believe in respect, safety and inclusion.” As well, Vaughan Mayor Stephen Del Duca, who has been outspoken when it comes to antisemitism in his city and region, was on Newstalk 1010 last Monday. Del Duca said he wants to Prime Minister Mark Carney to come to York Region to meet with members of the Jewish community. And he rightfully notes that: “Jew hatred has gone largely unchecked.” We finally did receive a statement from Patrick Casey, Director of Corporate Communications at the Regional Municipality of York. Casey states that they are aware of the allegations and that "York Region takes these types of matters seriously and is currently investigating." “York Region denounces violence targeting any community and remains committed to fostering welcoming and inclusive communities, as affirmed by the Inclusion Charter for York Region, where diversity is celebrated and where everyone can develop to their full potential. As this remains an internal staffing matter, York Region will continue to manage the issue through our standard protocols and procedures, and we have no further comment.” OK, we’ll take Mr. Casey at his word that this is under investigation. We shall follow up once that investigation is completed. In the meantime, perhaps Mayor Del Duca should forget about courting Carney. After all, we already know where the Prime Minister stands regarding antisemitism. Rather, the mayor should reach out to Eric Joliffe. Mr. Jolliffe is the chairman and CEO of York Region. Do you know prior to taking on this role, Jolliffe was Chief of the York Regional Police Service? Do you know the slogan for the York Regional Police is “Deeds speak”? Translation: tangible actions are more meaningful than hollow words. David Menzies](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2038605847756960255/media/HEqVP1OWsAEau5B.jpg)