Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
Any architects or physics experts out there? This video explains what should have happened with the twin towers. Is the video correct?
7,583,426 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren •via X (Twitter)
10 Kommentare

Logically, it should have just slid off the weakest side where most of the damage occurred. It wouldn't have just collapsed perfectly straight down (perfectly) at freefall speed. All of the floors below which were NOT damaged would have stopped or slowed the speed of collapse.

Never forget WTC7

I wonder how building 7 fell? 🤔

We all know what really happened 🤨

What actually occurred with the towers is more consistent with a controlled demolition with explosives on the lower levels. It’s likely the plane crashing into the building was intended simply to distract from the detonators down below and provide then”terrorism” cover story.

I remember when @WallStreetApes got community noted for this... so I figured I'd share it again for you. This is obviously 100% fiction...

A guy named Wall Street Silver on X is nearing to uncover us

dude when you see a video where they are comparing 9/11 to towers made of snow.. dont repost it.. as the video said thats highschool physics.. they are not the same at all. sorry this is like bad clickbait<3

It was a controlled demolition. It's blatantly obvious that Tower 7 collapsing was an inside job.

Rare footage inside WTC Building 7 on 9/11 after the destruction of the Twin Towers This 47-story steel framed skyscraper completely collapsed due to “office fires” a few hours later. Notice anything interesting?
