Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

AOC: Last year, this administration claimed in an unannounced strike that they had destroyed Iran’s nuclear capabilities. For them to have that claim and then say, “Oh, we were two seconds away from a nuclear weapon,” I think doesn’t add up. Their story doesn’t add up. The threat doesn’t...

Acyn's profile picture

Acyn

734,708 subscribers

62,216 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

“I have no indication that they were anywhere close to getting nuclear weapons since we bombed their facilities,” Sen. Ted Cruz says. He tells Margaret Brennan he doesn’t have present-day intelligence on what progress Iran has made toward rebuilding a nuclear weapon, but argues Tehran had “an ongoing desire” to rebuild.
2:42

“I have no indication that they were anywhere close to getting nuclear weapons since we bombed their facilities,” Sen. Ted Cruz says. He tells Margaret Brennan he doesn’t have present-day intelligence on what progress Iran has made toward rebuilding a nuclear weapon, but argues Tehran had “an ongoing desire” to rebuild.

Face The Nation

83,706 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

The government has run out of excuses for keeping nuclear power illegal. During this interview with Anthony Albanese the hosts press him on why nuclear power is banned… Albo: “no one is saying that - hey, we want to invest in this [nuclear]. No one.” Host: “There's a rule that says you can't.” Albo: “No, that's because it doesn’t stack up.” Host: “Why do you need a rule if the business case doesn’t stack up, to ban it?” Albo: “Because it doesn’t stack up” Host: “Well, get rid of the moratorium, then” The lack of clear answers goes to show that the government’s only justification for defending the bans on nuclear power is politics. It is wrong to conflate the economics of nuclear with a principled position to just consider nuclear power. At this time, we need all options on the table, including nuclear power. Sign our petition:
1:15

The government has run out of excuses for keeping nuclear power illegal. During this interview with Anthony Albanese the hosts press him on why nuclear power is banned… Albo: “no one is saying that - hey, we want to invest in this [nuclear]. No one.” Host: “There's a rule that says you can't.” Albo: “No, that's because it doesn’t stack up.” Host: “Why do you need a rule if the business case doesn’t stack up, to ban it?” Albo: “Because it doesn’t stack up” Host: “Well, get rid of the moratorium, then” The lack of clear answers goes to show that the government’s only justification for defending the bans on nuclear power is politics. It is wrong to conflate the economics of nuclear with a principled position to just consider nuclear power. At this time, we need all options on the table, including nuclear power. Sign our petition:

Will Shackel

70,344 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Tanden: We had a system where Iran had no nuclear access, no nuclear weapons. Jennings: False Tanden: They did not have nuclear weapons. Jennings: They were on the brink. Tanden: What is a brink? One year? Two years? Ten years?
0:28

Tanden: We had a system where Iran had no nuclear access, no nuclear weapons. Jennings: False Tanden: They did not have nuclear weapons. Jennings: They were on the brink. Tanden: What is a brink? One year? Two years? Ten years?

Acyn

171,676 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Reporter: We obliterated their nuclear facilities. What was the intelligence that suggested that somehow they became a threat once again? Hegseth: The evidence was that Iran had no intention of actually negotiating a nuclear deal that truly meant they had did not have a pathway to a nuclear bomb.
1:33

Reporter: We obliterated their nuclear facilities. What was the intelligence that suggested that somehow they became a threat once again? Hegseth: The evidence was that Iran had no intention of actually negotiating a nuclear deal that truly meant they had did not have a pathway to a nuclear bomb.

Acyn

342,944 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Rep. Adam Smith (D-WA) questioned Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth on the bombing of Iran’s nuclear facilities. Smith: “We had to start this war you just said 60 days ago because the nuclear weapon was an imminent threat. Now you're saying that it was completely obliterated?” Hegseth: “They had not given up their nuclear ambitions.”
1:56

Rep. Adam Smith (D-WA) questioned Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth on the bombing of Iran’s nuclear facilities. Smith: “We had to start this war you just said 60 days ago because the nuclear weapon was an imminent threat. Now you're saying that it was completely obliterated?” Hegseth: “They had not given up their nuclear ambitions.”

CBS News

53,996 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🇺🇸🇮🇷 TRUMP: IRAN’S STRUGGLING TO SURVIVE, FORGET THEIR NUKES! "Today, Iran is just trying to survive. You know, when I heard the reports 2 weeks ago, Iran’s looking to build a nuclear weapon, I said: 'Don’t worry about it. They’ve got a lot of things they want to do before nuclear weapons.' The last thing they want to do is build a nuclear weapon. It didn’t work out. And if they did a nuclear weapon before they got even close, that site would be attacked, and it would be wiped out." Source: President Donald J. Trump, Donald J. Trump, Aaron Rupar
0:28

🇺🇸🇮🇷 TRUMP: IRAN’S STRUGGLING TO SURVIVE, FORGET THEIR NUKES! "Today, Iran is just trying to survive. You know, when I heard the reports 2 weeks ago, Iran’s looking to build a nuclear weapon, I said: 'Don’t worry about it. They’ve got a lot of things they want to do before nuclear weapons.' The last thing they want to do is build a nuclear weapon. It didn’t work out. And if they did a nuclear weapon before they got even close, that site would be attacked, and it would be wiped out." Source: President Donald J. Trump, Donald J. Trump, Aaron Rupar

Mario Nawfal

1,019,947 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

JD Vance: "The nuclear weapons program is destroyed. It is gone. If the Iranians decided tomorrow to build a nuclear weapon, they simply don't have the capacity in order to do that— What we're trying to ensure is they don't rebuild that capacity not just a year from now, two years from now, but many, many years from now, so that our children never have to worry about a state sponsor of terrorism having a nuclear weapon."
0:21

JD Vance: "The nuclear weapons program is destroyed. It is gone. If the Iranians decided tomorrow to build a nuclear weapon, they simply don't have the capacity in order to do that— What we're trying to ensure is they don't rebuild that capacity not just a year from now, two years from now, but many, many years from now, so that our children never have to worry about a state sponsor of terrorism having a nuclear weapon."

MJTruthUltra

20,969 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Reporter: What would a good deal look like for you? Trump: No nuclear weapon. I think it’s already been regime change, but we never had that as a criteria. No nuclear weapon, that is 99%. Reporter: The strait as well? Trump: That will open up automatically
0:50

Reporter: What would a good deal look like for you? Trump: No nuclear weapon. I think it’s already been regime change, but we never had that as a criteria. No nuclear weapon, that is 99%. Reporter: The strait as well? Trump: That will open up automatically

Acyn

156,547 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Clark: House Republicans refuse to take yes for an answer. Mike Johnson said that this bill is a joke. That is another classic we can add to their lines about how they feel about the American people and what they are going through right now. We can add it to “affordability is a hoax”
1:38

Clark: House Republicans refuse to take yes for an answer. Mike Johnson said that this bill is a joke. That is another classic we can add to their lines about how they feel about the American people and what they are going through right now. We can add it to “affordability is a hoax”

Acyn

28,727 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

23 people have died in immigration detention this year under the Trump administration, and ICE seems to be lying about the circumstances. They told Congress that Chaofeng Ge died by suicide, but he was found with his hands and feet tied. That simply doesn’t add up.
0:38

23 people have died in immigration detention this year under the Trump administration, and ICE seems to be lying about the circumstances. They told Congress that Chaofeng Ge died by suicide, but he was found with his hands and feet tied. That simply doesn’t add up.

Rep. Pramila Jayapal

853,806 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Reporter: In March, the office of DNI concluded “Iran is not building a nuclear weapon, and Khamenei has not authorized the nuclear programs he suspended in 2003.” So what new intelligence does the U.S have since then that the Iranians have changed their position on nuclear weapons? And does this new intelligence come from U.S. Sources and methods, or are we getting this information from other countries?
1:20

Reporter: In March, the office of DNI concluded “Iran is not building a nuclear weapon, and Khamenei has not authorized the nuclear programs he suspended in 2003.” So what new intelligence does the U.S have since then that the Iranians have changed their position on nuclear weapons? And does this new intelligence come from U.S. Sources and methods, or are we getting this information from other countries?

Acyn

986,734 просмотров • 1 год назад

JUST IN 🇺🇸🇮🇷: U.S. Vice President on Iran Having Nukes They just do not want Muslim Countries to have nuclear weapons. Saudi Arabia buys billions in Weapons from America, and the U.S. still does not trust them. Vance: "And it's not just them, because if the Iranians get a nuclear weapon, you know who gets a nuclear weapon like the next day? The Saudi Arabians. And then somebody else in the Gulf Arab state. And so you have nuclear proliferation on a global scale. The biggest threat to security in the world is a lot of people having nuclear weapons. So what the president has said is Iran's not going to get a nuclear weapon."
0:33

JUST IN 🇺🇸🇮🇷: U.S. Vice President on Iran Having Nukes They just do not want Muslim Countries to have nuclear weapons. Saudi Arabia buys billions in Weapons from America, and the U.S. still does not trust them. Vance: "And it's not just them, because if the Iranians get a nuclear weapon, you know who gets a nuclear weapon like the next day? The Saudi Arabians. And then somebody else in the Gulf Arab state. And so you have nuclear proliferation on a global scale. The biggest threat to security in the world is a lot of people having nuclear weapons. So what the president has said is Iran's not going to get a nuclear weapon."

Ryan Rozbiani

73,195 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨 NOW: SecWar Pete Hegseth says it PERFECTLY on why Donald Trump had to do the right thing and strike Iran "They were creating a conventional umbrella of so many missiles and so many capabilities that no one would want to challenge them! Think of North Korea!" "This is the North Korea strategy. We have so many conventional capabilities. You won't do something about it." "And underneath that, we're going to develop more nuclear capabilities." "So the will was still there. President Trump had the courage to say we have to dismantle and take on those conventional capabilities." "While the dust, while the nuclear facilities are watched 24-7 and over watched, and we will ensure one way or another, hopefully around chooses a deal, that they give up those ambitions, give up those capabilities, and we're able to confirm that every step of the way." "So that has been President Trump's focus on it. He set them back like no other president." "He ripped up the terrible deal that would have given them a bomb. He took care of it in midnight hammer. We're watching it right now and ultimately feel good about the fact that the end state will ensure that Iran never has a nuclear weapon."
0:58

🚨 NOW: SecWar Pete Hegseth says it PERFECTLY on why Donald Trump had to do the right thing and strike Iran "They were creating a conventional umbrella of so many missiles and so many capabilities that no one would want to challenge them! Think of North Korea!" "This is the North Korea strategy. We have so many conventional capabilities. You won't do something about it." "And underneath that, we're going to develop more nuclear capabilities." "So the will was still there. President Trump had the courage to say we have to dismantle and take on those conventional capabilities." "While the dust, while the nuclear facilities are watched 24-7 and over watched, and we will ensure one way or another, hopefully around chooses a deal, that they give up those ambitions, give up those capabilities, and we're able to confirm that every step of the way." "So that has been President Trump's focus on it. He set them back like no other president." "He ripped up the terrible deal that would have given them a bomb. He took care of it in midnight hammer. We're watching it right now and ultimately feel good about the fact that the end state will ensure that Iran never has a nuclear weapon."

Eric Daugherty

20,098 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Sorkin: The President said that China was going to buy 12 million metric tons of soybeans by the end of the year. I’ve repeatedly asked members of the administration: the end of the year is basically here—we’re about 15 days away. I think we’ve sold about 300,000 metric tons. So how do you get from 300,000 to 12 million? The math just doesn’t add up.
1:53

Sorkin: The President said that China was going to buy 12 million metric tons of soybeans by the end of the year. I’ve repeatedly asked members of the administration: the end of the year is basically here—we’re about 15 days away. I think we’ve sold about 300,000 metric tons. So how do you get from 300,000 to 12 million? The math just doesn’t add up.

Acyn

228,320 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Bill O’Reilly pulls receipts on Chris Cuomo after Cuomo tried to claim Secretary Hegseth “made up” the intelligence on Iran’s nuclear program. O’REILLY: “So you’re a president of the United States, Cuomo, and you have Intel coming in from the CIA, the NSA and Mossad that says these people, the Iranians are very close to getting a nuclear weapon—” CUOMO: “That wasn’t the intelligence he got.” O’REILLY: “Yes, it was.” CUOMO: “We just heard the U.S. intelligence agencies put out information that they were not weeks away from having a nuclear weapon, just like Grossi from the IAEA. Hegseth either made that up or got it wrong.” O’REILLY: “Okay, no it’s a Reuters report. That’s what you were citing last week, which was totally phony.” CUOMO: “Oh, really? How do you know?” O’REILLY: “The Wall Street Journal...because the Wall Street Journal citing the Institute for Science and International Security.” “Whereas Reuters cited nothing, just anonymous sources.” “The headline was U.S. Israeli strike set back Iran’s ability to build a nuclear weapon.” “The headline at Reuters, that you jumped on, was Iran no further from nuclear weapon than before war.” “Reuters is not a legitimate news agency, it’s a partisan news agency that hates Trump.”
1:09

Bill O’Reilly pulls receipts on Chris Cuomo after Cuomo tried to claim Secretary Hegseth “made up” the intelligence on Iran’s nuclear program. O’REILLY: “So you’re a president of the United States, Cuomo, and you have Intel coming in from the CIA, the NSA and Mossad that says these people, the Iranians are very close to getting a nuclear weapon—” CUOMO: “That wasn’t the intelligence he got.” O’REILLY: “Yes, it was.” CUOMO: “We just heard the U.S. intelligence agencies put out information that they were not weeks away from having a nuclear weapon, just like Grossi from the IAEA. Hegseth either made that up or got it wrong.” O’REILLY: “Okay, no it’s a Reuters report. That’s what you were citing last week, which was totally phony.” CUOMO: “Oh, really? How do you know?” O’REILLY: “The Wall Street Journal...because the Wall Street Journal citing the Institute for Science and International Security.” “Whereas Reuters cited nothing, just anonymous sources.” “The headline was U.S. Israeli strike set back Iran’s ability to build a nuclear weapon.” “The headline at Reuters, that you jumped on, was Iran no further from nuclear weapon than before war.” “Reuters is not a legitimate news agency, it’s a partisan news agency that hates Trump.”

Overton

50,292 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Senator Murphy coming out of private briefing on the attack on Iran’s nuclear sites: It still appears that we have only set back the Iranian nuclear program by a handful of months… the allegations that we have obliterated their program just don’t seem to stand up…
0:58

Senator Murphy coming out of private briefing on the attack on Iran’s nuclear sites: It still appears that we have only set back the Iranian nuclear program by a handful of months… the allegations that we have obliterated their program just don’t seem to stand up…

Acyn

190,350 просмотров • 1 год назад

Moulton: The president started by saying, we need a deal, basically the same deal that he tore up in his first term, the deal that Obama had secured and that his own administration certified Iran was following. That deal, prevented Iran from ever building a nuclear weapon. And most importantly, it had intrusive inspections and electronic monitoring so we could see exactly what they were doing and respond if they violated the deal. We don't have any of that right now, so we don't even know the exact status of their nuclear weapons program. We know the president is lying about it because he told us last summer it was obliterated. And yet now in his speech, just a couple nights ago, he's saying we have to bomb it further.
1:44

Moulton: The president started by saying, we need a deal, basically the same deal that he tore up in his first term, the deal that Obama had secured and that his own administration certified Iran was following. That deal, prevented Iran from ever building a nuclear weapon. And most importantly, it had intrusive inspections and electronic monitoring so we could see exactly what they were doing and respond if they violated the deal. We don't have any of that right now, so we don't even know the exact status of their nuclear weapons program. We know the president is lying about it because he told us last summer it was obliterated. And yet now in his speech, just a couple nights ago, he's saying we have to bomb it further.

Acyn

32,129 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад