AP reported that McCarthy's impeachment inquiry was launched "without evidence.” Here’s McCarthy forcing an AP reporter to admit that there was lots of evidence to support an impeachment inquiry.

FYI, @FarnoushAmiri. You keep saying “without evidence” but here you acknowledged over and over that “that’s what the testimony said.” You understand that testimony is evidence, right? So which is it, are you dumb or dishonest? Cuz those are the only two options here.

We rag on Philip Bump and he deserves it. But the truth is 95% of the legacy media is exactly like him.

💯💯💯

The truth will eventually even reach MSM through sessions like this. They're going to have to cover it.

"I can't answer that" AKA- I know the answer, but my news agency will fire me if i speak the truth.

@SpeakerMcCarthy @MZHemingway What McCarthy should also ask every reporter: Do you believe the investigation into Hunter Biden was conducted fairly, thoroughly and without impediment?

@tlansdown 1. Circumstantial evidence is still evidence. Don’t be fooled by the “no direct evidence” red herring. 2. If this were a civil lawsuit, there is without question enough direct/circumstantial evidence to survive a motion for summary judgment.

Loads of evidence!

AP regime propagandist.

@JJCarafano The AP is garbage