正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Apostate Prophet Admits that David Wood doesn’t actually believe that the Zutt hadith is about sex with black men They expose themselves consistently and this bread of life girl is helping us expose them further because she’s not backing down on her interpretation being wrong. My next video on... show more

Deen

5,756 subscribers

16,068 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

This ex-Muslim is risking his life to expose the lie about Islam being a religion of peace. Please listen to what he has to say — and share this video if you believe more people deserve to hear the truth about Islam.

This ex-Muslim is risking his life to expose the lie about Islam being a religion of peace. Please listen to what he has to say — and share this video if you believe more people deserve to hear the truth about Islam.

Liza Rosen

126,330 次观看 • 1 年前

Imam Tawhidi is a clear disbeliever. He insults and belittles the Prophet ﷺ, his wives, and his friends. He doesn’t even believe in the Afterlife, as evidenced in his debate with Daniel Haqiqatjou Why is he the head of the “Global Imams Council”? Why is this apostate allowed to speak on behalf of Islam, when it’s clear that he’s a disbeliever? It’s extremely important that Muslims watch out for the secret apostates among us. They will pretend to be Muslim, while seeking to undermine Islam from within. Tawhidi is one of the clearest examples of a disbeliever pretending to be a Muslim.

Imam Tawhidi is a clear disbeliever. He insults and belittles the Prophet ﷺ, his wives, and his friends. He doesn’t even believe in the Afterlife, as evidenced in his debate with Daniel Haqiqatjou Why is he the head of the “Global Imams Council”? Why is this apostate allowed to speak on behalf of Islam, when it’s clear that he’s a disbeliever? It’s extremely important that Muslims watch out for the secret apostates among us. They will pretend to be Muslim, while seeking to undermine Islam from within. Tawhidi is one of the clearest examples of a disbeliever pretending to be a Muslim.

OJ Smoke

55,363 次观看 • 8 个月前

AFRO IS NOT HARAM It was reported that, the Nob'e Prophet (SAW) said: “Whoever has hair, let him honor it.” (Sunan Abu Dawood, Hadith 4163, graded Hasan by Al-Albani). This Hadith encourages Muslims to take care of their hair, suggesting it is a blessing that deserves respect and proper grooming. The phrase “let him honor it” implies care, cleanliness, and not shaving it off without purpose—so it aligns with the idea that keeping hair is something commendable. There’s also historical context from the life of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), where he is described as having shoulder-length hair at times and taking care of it.

AFRO IS NOT HARAM It was reported that, the Nob'e Prophet (SAW) said: “Whoever has hair, let him honor it.” (Sunan Abu Dawood, Hadith 4163, graded Hasan by Al-Albani). This Hadith encourages Muslims to take care of their hair, suggesting it is a blessing that deserves respect and proper grooming. The phrase “let him honor it” implies care, cleanliness, and not shaving it off without purpose—so it aligns with the idea that keeping hair is something commendable. There’s also historical context from the life of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), where he is described as having shoulder-length hair at times and taking care of it.

𝐇𝐢𝐝𝐢𝐦𝐚, 𝐏𝐡.𝐃.

34,803 次观看 • 1 年前

✨ Learing starts from the womb to the tomb guys. Such a fitting slogan for daycare that has been violated a few years ago for “subjected children to prohibited disciplinary actions.” Many say Islam is incompatible with the west, more so with daycares in the west. My understanding that some interpretations of “Hadith” is that they are allowed to beat children if they do not pray to their false god by the age of 10. Not saying that’s what happened, just expressing an opinion that people who participate in religion founded on a man who married a 6 year old might not be the perfect candidates for child care operators….

✨ Learing starts from the womb to the tomb guys. Such a fitting slogan for daycare that has been violated a few years ago for “subjected children to prohibited disciplinary actions.” Many say Islam is incompatible with the west, more so with daycares in the west. My understanding that some interpretations of “Hadith” is that they are allowed to beat children if they do not pray to their false god by the age of 10. Not saying that’s what happened, just expressing an opinion that people who participate in religion founded on a man who married a 6 year old might not be the perfect candidates for child care operators….

Angela Rose

71,554 次观看 • 7 个月前

DEBATE CHALLENGE: New Testament vs. Sunni Hadith: Which Is More Historically Reliable? Robert Spencer claims that the reliability of the New Testament is "much greater" than Sunni hadith. Well, debate me on it Robert. Obviously, the debate on Quran vs Bible in terms of historical reliability is long over. Due to overwhelming empirical evidence, the academic consensus has decisively come down in favor of the Quran and only the kookiest Christoan hacks still pretend like this is questionable. But what about hadith? Are hadith more reliable than the Bible? The answer is a definitive yes, and I challenge Robert to prove otherwise. If Robert chickens out and runs away (per usual), any other scholarly Christian authority is welcome to take up the challenge.

DEBATE CHALLENGE: New Testament vs. Sunni Hadith: Which Is More Historically Reliable? Robert Spencer claims that the reliability of the New Testament is "much greater" than Sunni hadith. Well, debate me on it Robert. Obviously, the debate on Quran vs Bible in terms of historical reliability is long over. Due to overwhelming empirical evidence, the academic consensus has decisively come down in favor of the Quran and only the kookiest Christoan hacks still pretend like this is questionable. But what about hadith? Are hadith more reliable than the Bible? The answer is a definitive yes, and I challenge Robert to prove otherwise. If Robert chickens out and runs away (per usual), any other scholarly Christian authority is welcome to take up the challenge.

Daniel Haqiqatjou

34,292 次观看 • 1 年前

Bret Weinstein cuts straight to the chase: "We are going to have an endless battle in which those of us who see what we believe is clear evidence of some kind of election rigging or fraud are faced with indignation from a vast array of people portraying themselves as more rigorous and careful who say, 'Where is your evidence? Where exactly is your evidence that there was something wrong with this election?' And we are gonna be caught in the following predicament. No piece of evidence is sufficient to establish that case. And the sum total of all of the evidence contains true things and false things. So it is also no good. So the question is, can you logically deduce that something has gone wrong? I believe you can easily. Can you prove it? No. And not being able to prove it means that the election will proceed. It will be validated by all of the structures, including the courts. And that means that those who take on the power that derives from these elections will be the result of whatever process we just went through, whether it was an election that happened to be anomalous through organic means, or it was the result of some kind of fraud or election rigging. That is not an accident. That is not an accident. And the point that I wanna make primarily is the primary evidence against elections that look like this being organic is not actually in the trickle of evidence that we are actually able to see, the moment by moment vote count that does something strange during the night when some large tranche of ballots is suddenly counted or something like that. The evidence is in the structure of how the elections are actually carried out. These elections are designed to allow fraud that cannot be detected and will not be prosecuted. And that's really the thing that we must focus on." Bret Weinstein

Bret Weinstein cuts straight to the chase: "We are going to have an endless battle in which those of us who see what we believe is clear evidence of some kind of election rigging or fraud are faced with indignation from a vast array of people portraying themselves as more rigorous and careful who say, 'Where is your evidence? Where exactly is your evidence that there was something wrong with this election?' And we are gonna be caught in the following predicament. No piece of evidence is sufficient to establish that case. And the sum total of all of the evidence contains true things and false things. So it is also no good. So the question is, can you logically deduce that something has gone wrong? I believe you can easily. Can you prove it? No. And not being able to prove it means that the election will proceed. It will be validated by all of the structures, including the courts. And that means that those who take on the power that derives from these elections will be the result of whatever process we just went through, whether it was an election that happened to be anomalous through organic means, or it was the result of some kind of fraud or election rigging. That is not an accident. That is not an accident. And the point that I wanna make primarily is the primary evidence against elections that look like this being organic is not actually in the trickle of evidence that we are actually able to see, the moment by moment vote count that does something strange during the night when some large tranche of ballots is suddenly counted or something like that. The evidence is in the structure of how the elections are actually carried out. These elections are designed to allow fraud that cannot be detected and will not be prosecuted. And that's really the thing that we must focus on." Bret Weinstein

The DarkHorse Podcast

696,713 次观看 • 2 个月前

According to narrations, the Angel of Death (Malak al-Mawt) sought permission from Allah to approach the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) to take his soul. Unlike other human beings whose souls are taken without prior consultation, the Prophet was given a choice—a unique honor bestowed upon him. The Angel of Death said to him: "Your Lord has sent me to you, and He has instructed me not to take your soul except with your permission." The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) then made his decision. It is reported in a hadith: "The Prophet was given the choice between this worldly life and what is with Allah, and he chose what is with Allah." [Sahih al-Bukhari, Hadith 4435]

According to narrations, the Angel of Death (Malak al-Mawt) sought permission from Allah to approach the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) to take his soul. Unlike other human beings whose souls are taken without prior consultation, the Prophet was given a choice—a unique honor bestowed upon him. The Angel of Death said to him: "Your Lord has sent me to you, and He has instructed me not to take your soul except with your permission." The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) then made his decision. It is reported in a hadith: "The Prophet was given the choice between this worldly life and what is with Allah, and he chose what is with Allah." [Sahih al-Bukhari, Hadith 4435]

Idris

24,895 次观看 • 11 个月前

Jake makes a HUGE blunder on istighatha. Jake: "If [a person] was in front of the grave of the Prophet and made that statement [O Prophet give me a child] and he meant by that he is asking the Prophet to make dua for him, then we believe this is a bida." ⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️ Jake, further explaining: "The people who do that [ask the Prophet directly for children] in front of the grave of the Prophet with the meaning that they are asking the Prophet to make dua for them for those things, NO, that's NOT shirk akbar." Me, trying to get clarification: "What is the ruling for the person who says 'O Prophet give me a child?' at his grave? Is that shirk akbar or not?" Jake: "You said that by that they mean just asking the Prophet to make dua?" Me: "But they don't say that. They just say 'O Prophet give me a child." Jake: It doesn't matter. ________________________ What do the Wahhabis make of this? This guy is your aqida police lol Even Deen at the end of the clip says that "everone was telling" him that this was a blunder.

Jake makes a HUGE blunder on istighatha. Jake: "If [a person] was in front of the grave of the Prophet and made that statement [O Prophet give me a child] and he meant by that he is asking the Prophet to make dua for him, then we believe this is a bida." ⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️ Jake, further explaining: "The people who do that [ask the Prophet directly for children] in front of the grave of the Prophet with the meaning that they are asking the Prophet to make dua for them for those things, NO, that's NOT shirk akbar." Me, trying to get clarification: "What is the ruling for the person who says 'O Prophet give me a child?' at his grave? Is that shirk akbar or not?" Jake: "You said that by that they mean just asking the Prophet to make dua?" Me: "But they don't say that. They just say 'O Prophet give me a child." Jake: It doesn't matter. ________________________ What do the Wahhabis make of this? This guy is your aqida police lol Even Deen at the end of the clip says that "everone was telling" him that this was a blunder.

Daniel Haqiqatjou

42,774 次观看 • 7 个月前

“He apologised for all of those!” “None of them are slurs!” 1. He also apologised for the BAFTAs incident (not that he should have needed to, same with the other incidents). He even removed himself from the theatre at one point because he was having such a severe tic attack. 2. Coprolalia causes the involuntary utterance of taboo or obscene language, including slurs. Just because he didn’t call the Queen a cracker or tell the woman with cancer that she’s a r***rd, doesn’t make it any less “offensive” on the surface. My point is to illustrate that coprolalia has no limits, and no sensitivities. It is involuntary at its core and leads to many uncomfortable or inappropriate situations. Need more explicit proof? I’ve attached a video of a black lady called Ruth shouting (non-black) racist slurs in a supermarket and doing the Sieg Heil. She admits that no race, religion, gender, sexuality etc is “off limits” because of her tourettes. She also clarifies that she is not racist. ITS BECAUSE SHE HAS TOURETTES. But you utter fools are conveniently ignoring those facts because you want an excuse to rant, rave, and try to destroy the life of a disabled man who has spent his entire life with an incurable medical condition that causes involuntary utterances. And who has dedicated his entire life to raising awareness and dispelling misinformation around the symptoms of tourettes. What about the black people with Tourettes who spout racial slurs against asians, pakistanis, gay people, et al? And what about the black people with Tourettes who have come out in defence of John Davidson… because they actually understand tourettes and the involuntary nature of coprolalia. Where is your outrage against them? Where is your demand for apologies? Where is your hierarchy of victimhood? Get off the high horse and get a grip.

“He apologised for all of those!” “None of them are slurs!” 1. He also apologised for the BAFTAs incident (not that he should have needed to, same with the other incidents). He even removed himself from the theatre at one point because he was having such a severe tic attack. 2. Coprolalia causes the involuntary utterance of taboo or obscene language, including slurs. Just because he didn’t call the Queen a cracker or tell the woman with cancer that she’s a r***rd, doesn’t make it any less “offensive” on the surface. My point is to illustrate that coprolalia has no limits, and no sensitivities. It is involuntary at its core and leads to many uncomfortable or inappropriate situations. Need more explicit proof? I’ve attached a video of a black lady called Ruth shouting (non-black) racist slurs in a supermarket and doing the Sieg Heil. She admits that no race, religion, gender, sexuality etc is “off limits” because of her tourettes. She also clarifies that she is not racist. ITS BECAUSE SHE HAS TOURETTES. But you utter fools are conveniently ignoring those facts because you want an excuse to rant, rave, and try to destroy the life of a disabled man who has spent his entire life with an incurable medical condition that causes involuntary utterances. And who has dedicated his entire life to raising awareness and dispelling misinformation around the symptoms of tourettes. What about the black people with Tourettes who spout racial slurs against asians, pakistanis, gay people, et al? And what about the black people with Tourettes who have come out in defence of John Davidson… because they actually understand tourettes and the involuntary nature of coprolalia. Where is your outrage against them? Where is your demand for apologies? Where is your hierarchy of victimhood? Get off the high horse and get a grip.

Samantha Smith

54,719 次观看 • 5 个月前

This video is important to watch because when we ask ourselves how we got into this mess, the answer lies in videos like this one. 2020. A pathetic Joe Biden grovels and panders for Muslim support on a zoom call with national Islamic leaders. It's like a comedy sketch. Biden said that he wished more Islam was taught in schools and then actually quoted a verse from an Hadith. It's worth noting that Biden was reading from a screen placed right above camera and he was still struggling. The Democrat party is made up of radicals and shameless weak people who will do and say anything to appease the radicals.

This video is important to watch because when we ask ourselves how we got into this mess, the answer lies in videos like this one. 2020. A pathetic Joe Biden grovels and panders for Muslim support on a zoom call with national Islamic leaders. It's like a comedy sketch. Biden said that he wished more Islam was taught in schools and then actually quoted a verse from an Hadith. It's worth noting that Biden was reading from a screen placed right above camera and he was still struggling. The Democrat party is made up of radicals and shameless weak people who will do and say anything to appease the radicals.

MAZE

163,822 次观看 • 1 个月前

Warning Texas! Radical Imam Yasir Qadhi: Muslims Should NEVER Marry Non-Muslims 🔴 This is one of the men leading the 402-acre Sharia City project in Texas. 🔴 This is the man who sits on the Fiqh Council of North America, pushing for the expansion of Sharia in the U.S. 🔴 This is the man ensuring that Islam does not integrate—but dominates. At Epic Mosque, Yasir Qadhi made it clear: ✅ Muslim men should NOT marry Christian or Jewish women in the West. ✅ Muslim women are NEVER allowed to marry non-Muslim men. ✅ Islam must rule the household—because non-Muslims cannot be trusted with authority. What Does He Mean by "Katabi" (Ahl al-Kitab)? When Qadhi says “Katabi”, he means “People of the Book”—Jews and Christians. Islamic law allows Muslim men to marry Christian or Jewish women only under strict conditions. But Qadhi goes further—saying even that should be banned in the West. And for Muslim women? It is NEVER allowed. Because a non-Muslim man would have authority over a Muslim woman—and that is unacceptable in Islam. And he admits this is not just his opinion—this is the unanimous ruling of Islamic law. This Isn’t About Marriage—It’s About Islamic Supremacy. 🚨 Qadhi says Muslim “authority” must be preserved. 🚨 He rejects integration, insisting that Islam must control the family. 🚨 He warns that interfaith marriage threatens Islamic dominance. ❌ Non-Muslims are NOT equals. ❌ Interfaith relationships are a danger to Islam. ❌ Islamic law must take precedence—even in America. This isn’t about religion. It’s about control. And this is the radical helping to build a 1,000+ home Sharia enclave in Texas—where non-Muslims will always be outsiders. America, wake up. This is political Islam gaining ground—on U.S. soil.

Warning Texas! Radical Imam Yasir Qadhi: Muslims Should NEVER Marry Non-Muslims 🔴 This is one of the men leading the 402-acre Sharia City project in Texas. 🔴 This is the man who sits on the Fiqh Council of North America, pushing for the expansion of Sharia in the U.S. 🔴 This is the man ensuring that Islam does not integrate—but dominates. At Epic Mosque, Yasir Qadhi made it clear: ✅ Muslim men should NOT marry Christian or Jewish women in the West. ✅ Muslim women are NEVER allowed to marry non-Muslim men. ✅ Islam must rule the household—because non-Muslims cannot be trusted with authority. What Does He Mean by "Katabi" (Ahl al-Kitab)? When Qadhi says “Katabi”, he means “People of the Book”—Jews and Christians. Islamic law allows Muslim men to marry Christian or Jewish women only under strict conditions. But Qadhi goes further—saying even that should be banned in the West. And for Muslim women? It is NEVER allowed. Because a non-Muslim man would have authority over a Muslim woman—and that is unacceptable in Islam. And he admits this is not just his opinion—this is the unanimous ruling of Islamic law. This Isn’t About Marriage—It’s About Islamic Supremacy. 🚨 Qadhi says Muslim “authority” must be preserved. 🚨 He rejects integration, insisting that Islam must control the family. 🚨 He warns that interfaith marriage threatens Islamic dominance. ❌ Non-Muslims are NOT equals. ❌ Interfaith relationships are a danger to Islam. ❌ Islamic law must take precedence—even in America. This isn’t about religion. It’s about control. And this is the radical helping to build a 1,000+ home Sharia enclave in Texas—where non-Muslims will always be outsiders. America, wake up. This is political Islam gaining ground—on U.S. soil.

Amy Mek

137,705 次观看 • 1 年前

💰 Andrew Tate on what your money is actually for. "There are two kinds of rich men. The one who brags about how little he spends, and the one who spends 200 grand a week actually living. One of them is lying about being rich." Real life is to be lived. That is what the money is for. Most men will never make enough to find out. The ones who do learn it inside The Real World, from men who actually live it. Link in bio.

💰 Andrew Tate on what your money is actually for. "There are two kinds of rich men. The one who brags about how little he spends, and the one who spends 200 grand a week actually living. One of them is lying about being rich." Real life is to be lived. That is what the money is for. Most men will never make enough to find out. The ones who do learn it inside The Real World, from men who actually live it. Link in bio.

The Real World App

11,683 次观看 • 2 个月前

A dialogue between a Muslim and an atheist: Muslim: There are over 1.8 billion Muslims in the World, and soon we'll overcome the Infidels. Atheist: The 1.8 billion include Ahmadis & Qadiyanis? Muslim: No, Ahmadi Qadiyanis dogs have got nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: How about those Barelvis visiting graves and worshipping the dead? ; they Muslim: Barelvis are infidels. They have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: What do you think of ISIS? The majority of them are Sunnis? Muslim: They have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: How about Shias, following 12 Imams, offering prayers differently, bathing in blood, and calling names to Abu Bakr & Umar? Muslim: Shia Kafirs have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: In a newspaper, there was a headline about an Imam raping a 5-year-old boy and later killing him by hanging with a fan? Muslim: These prayer leaders are bringing a bad name to Islam, they have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: There is another sect that denies all the Hadiths and follows nothing but Quran, known as Parvezis? Muslim: Parvezi followers have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: I heard that Prophet Muhammad married Ayesha when she was 6 and he was 53? Muslim: These are all fabricated Ahadith. Atheist: But these are in the books of Ahadith compiled by Imam Bukhari, Imam Muslim, and considered correct by Ahl-e-Hadith? Muslim: Ahl e Hadith have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: Taliban are killing people in Afghanistan and Pakistan, not allowing girls education, taking up jobs, going to public parks, and never allowing them in public without shuttlecock burqas. Muslim: They are Deo-Bandi Kharjis; they are the agents of India, Israel, and America - they have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: How about those mystic Sufi saints. Muslim: The sufis don’t follow Islam by the book and hold beliefs that lead to infidelity. Thus, they have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: What is your opinion about liberal & progressive Muslims? Muslim: They have gone astray; they include seculars that have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: How about the Saudi Salafi & Wahhabi groups? Muslims: They are extremists and Jihadists; they have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: What do you think of killing non-Muslims? Muslim: Islam is a religion of peace; killings have no place in Islam. Atheist: But Jihad is ordered in the Quran in apparent words? Muslim: It has nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: But Jihad is the 6th Pillar of Islam. Muslim: Islam has 5 pillars only. Atheist: Saudi Prince MBS is on an Islam moderation drive, allowed concerts, and says hadith was written 250 years after Mohammed, and most are false. Muslim: MBS is an American and Israeli agent and has nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: Is it true that Abbasid Abd Al Malik invented Islam and the Quran, and Mohammed did not exist in history? Muslim: Abbasids were descendants of Yazid and were kafirs and had nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: You mean to say Islam has nothing to do with Islam? Muslim: You kaffirs will never understand Islam.

A dialogue between a Muslim and an atheist: Muslim: There are over 1.8 billion Muslims in the World, and soon we'll overcome the Infidels. Atheist: The 1.8 billion include Ahmadis & Qadiyanis? Muslim: No, Ahmadi Qadiyanis dogs have got nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: How about those Barelvis visiting graves and worshipping the dead? ; they Muslim: Barelvis are infidels. They have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: What do you think of ISIS? The majority of them are Sunnis? Muslim: They have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: How about Shias, following 12 Imams, offering prayers differently, bathing in blood, and calling names to Abu Bakr & Umar? Muslim: Shia Kafirs have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: In a newspaper, there was a headline about an Imam raping a 5-year-old boy and later killing him by hanging with a fan? Muslim: These prayer leaders are bringing a bad name to Islam, they have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: There is another sect that denies all the Hadiths and follows nothing but Quran, known as Parvezis? Muslim: Parvezi followers have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: I heard that Prophet Muhammad married Ayesha when she was 6 and he was 53? Muslim: These are all fabricated Ahadith. Atheist: But these are in the books of Ahadith compiled by Imam Bukhari, Imam Muslim, and considered correct by Ahl-e-Hadith? Muslim: Ahl e Hadith have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: Taliban are killing people in Afghanistan and Pakistan, not allowing girls education, taking up jobs, going to public parks, and never allowing them in public without shuttlecock burqas. Muslim: They are Deo-Bandi Kharjis; they are the agents of India, Israel, and America - they have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: How about those mystic Sufi saints. Muslim: The sufis don’t follow Islam by the book and hold beliefs that lead to infidelity. Thus, they have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: What is your opinion about liberal & progressive Muslims? Muslim: They have gone astray; they include seculars that have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: How about the Saudi Salafi & Wahhabi groups? Muslims: They are extremists and Jihadists; they have nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: What do you think of killing non-Muslims? Muslim: Islam is a religion of peace; killings have no place in Islam. Atheist: But Jihad is ordered in the Quran in apparent words? Muslim: It has nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: But Jihad is the 6th Pillar of Islam. Muslim: Islam has 5 pillars only. Atheist: Saudi Prince MBS is on an Islam moderation drive, allowed concerts, and says hadith was written 250 years after Mohammed, and most are false. Muslim: MBS is an American and Israeli agent and has nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: Is it true that Abbasid Abd Al Malik invented Islam and the Quran, and Mohammed did not exist in history? Muslim: Abbasids were descendants of Yazid and were kafirs and had nothing to do with Islam. Atheist: You mean to say Islam has nothing to do with Islam? Muslim: You kaffirs will never understand Islam.

Imtiaz Mahmood

157,538 次观看 • 1 年前

"My hope is, for my people, that the message is not merely that slavery is wrong because we are the slaves, but it is actually an interrogation of systems & a belief that those systems should not exist in the world no matter who it is." -Ta-Nehisi Coates on his new book.

"My hope is, for my people, that the message is not merely that slavery is wrong because we are the slaves, but it is actually an interrogation of systems & a belief that those systems should not exist in the world no matter who it is." -Ta-Nehisi Coates on his new book.

AYMAN

214,720 次观看 • 1 年前

ELON: ORDINARY CITIZENS VERY OFTEN KNOW MORE THAN JOURNALISTS “I think the media is a driver of misinformation much more than the media would like to admit that they are. In a lot of cases, it is the average citizen that knows more than the journalist. Very often, when I see an article about something that I know a lot about, and I read the article, they get a lot wrong. It's the best interpretation of someone who doesn't really understand what's going on in the industry, has only a few facts to play with, and has to come up with an article. It's not going to hit the bullseye. If you read an article about something you know about, how accurate is that article? Now, imagine that that is how essentially all articles are. They're an approximation of what's going on, but not an exact situation. If somebody is actually an expert in the field, and was actually there and then writes about their experience of being actually there, I think that actually that's, in a lot of cases, going to be better than a journalist because the journalist wasn't there.” Source: Interview with the BBC, April 2023

ELON: ORDINARY CITIZENS VERY OFTEN KNOW MORE THAN JOURNALISTS “I think the media is a driver of misinformation much more than the media would like to admit that they are. In a lot of cases, it is the average citizen that knows more than the journalist. Very often, when I see an article about something that I know a lot about, and I read the article, they get a lot wrong. It's the best interpretation of someone who doesn't really understand what's going on in the industry, has only a few facts to play with, and has to come up with an article. It's not going to hit the bullseye. If you read an article about something you know about, how accurate is that article? Now, imagine that that is how essentially all articles are. They're an approximation of what's going on, but not an exact situation. If somebody is actually an expert in the field, and was actually there and then writes about their experience of being actually there, I think that actually that's, in a lot of cases, going to be better than a journalist because the journalist wasn't there.” Source: Interview with the BBC, April 2023

Mario Nawfal

8,733,042 次观看 • 1 年前