Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Apparently Alex Jones is REALLY upset that a prankster called him pretending to be Tucker Carlson. Jones stated the following about the Prankster: “He stole Tucker Carlson’s identity. He faked his number. He faked his voice. He called me and made sexual threats, basically. And he just thinks that’s...

2,527,213 views • 3 years ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

JHN's profile picture
JHN3 years ago

He can dish it out, but he can't take it.

Brian Krassenstein's profile picture
Brian Krassenstein3 years ago

Well said!

The Phantom's profile picture
The Phantom3 years ago

Brian please don't tweet about this, Elon is gonna fucking see it now.

Joseph's profile picture
Joseph3 years ago

I don't know honestly how anyone can listen to this guy. Used to be different....but has gone off the rails completely

Brian Krassenstein's profile picture
Brian Krassenstein3 years ago

I've never been a fan, but I do agree he has gone further and further down the rabbit hole over the years.

Dj's profile picture
Dj3 years ago

Wasnt this guy talking about Epstein’s island in the 90s? How it was an intelligence operation? And now its coming out that the CIA, head of banks, and even Bill Gates were having meeting with him? Hes been wrong about stuff but hes also been right.

Brian Krassenstein's profile picture
Brian Krassenstein3 years ago

There is a difference between "being wrong" and knowing you are wrong but using the argument to further torment the victims of a tragedy in order to make a dollar.

go Laura()'s profile picture
go Laura()3 years ago

The prankster posted he did this on Twitter 😅.

Travis Matthew's profile picture
Travis Matthew3 years ago

Alex Jones playing the ‘Dicktim’ card…

UnRooolie ❼'s profile picture
UnRooolie ❼3 years ago

Can we get the video of this please

Related Videos

Tucker Carlson Drops Bombshell Theory on Alex Jones and 9/11 For 15 years, Tucker Carlson has watched the federal government—FBI, DOJ, and more—relentlessly target Alex Jones. Yet, no so-called gatekeepers, whistleblower protectors, or journalistic "ethics guardians" have defended Jones on First Amendment grounds. This silence is deafening. But the real question burns brighter: Why are the feds so hellbent on destroying Alex Jones? Here’s Carlson’s explosive theory, laid bare: In February 2001, Alex Jones went on air and made a chilling prediction. He warned, with timestamped precision, that planes would crash into the World Trade Centers. He said they’d pin it on Osama bin Laden. He even urged viewers to call the Bush White House to sound the alarm. Jones didn’t just hint at 9/11—he called it, in detail, months before it happened. The tapes exist. Carlson has played them. This isn’t speculation; it’s fact. Then, September 11, 2001, unfolds exactly as Jones foretold. The 9/11 Commission is swiftly convened to investigate. They grill countless officials, insiders, and experts, asking: Were there signs? Could this have been stopped? But one man is conspicuously absent from their list: Alex Jones—the only person who publicly predicted the attack with uncanny accuracy. Not a single investigator asks, “How did Jones know?” No subpoena. No interview. Nothing. Instead, the full weight of the DOJ and FBI is unleashed to destroy him. Coincidence? Carlson thinks not. “The connection is clear,” he says. “Jones exposed something they didn’t want known. Rather than hailing him as a prophet—or at least asking how he knew—they moved to silence him. Why? What are they hiding?” This isn’t just about Alex Jones. It’s about a system that punishes truth-tellers while protecting its own. Carlson demands answers: Why was Jones ignored by the 9/11 Commission? Why has the government spent decades trying to crush him instead of investigating his sources? And what does this say about the state of free speech in America? The tapes are real. The questions are urgent. The truth won’t stay buried forever.

Camus

52,880 views • 1 year ago

🚨BOMBSHELL: Joe Kent's old army buddy reveals the true story. On tonight's episode of the Political Theater, Alladin, who served in Iraq with Joe Kent back in 2012 and have been close ever since, revealed that he had a phone call with Joe Kent and revealed that Kent said he did not have access to the information he claimed he had, that he was coerced into pulling this stunt, and that the interview with Tucker Carlson was scheduled A WEEK in advance. "Title 10 is internal collection authority, title title 50 is external and NCTC they don't have any of that. So the NCTC agents is basically they get fed information from FBI, other intelligence agencies and they try to make sense of the intel intelligence that they receive. And that's what was his frustration because he was asking questions and he was not getting it and that's where the confusion happened." Q: "So this means that his role actually had no access to intelligence unless it was given to him and then he was asking for specific intelligence and they were not getting giving it to him whether it existed or not, he has no ability to even know that in the first place?" A: "Correct." Q: "Who pushed him into this because I'm sure you asked him?" A: "He did not want to divulge that. I think I know where it was. I can tell you one thing. Uh the interview with Tucker Carlson, it was not scheduled like an hour after uh his resignation letter. It was actually scheduled the week prior." "He has his own frustration with everything and uh I don't think uh the Tucker Carlson because I had uh about I'm not going to lie to you guys I had about 12 minutes uh a phone call with him and and I think he has some regrets to the Tucker Carlson interview because Tucker Carlson like he veered him into like the whole Charlie Kirk and other stuff that he was not expecting anyway and he was like just basically that as the interview was going. So yeah, this to me tells me that Joe Kent made a mistake and whoever it is that veered him into this direction uh would also made a mistake. So, not wise, but you know, oh well." "By the by the way, I operated with that guy actually I was in combat with him. That's how well, I know Joe Kent. I was in combat with him in 2012." "I have no idea who put him into this and I'm still upset about it. And uh uh and thank God, he had a a 12 minute to spare me a f*cking conversation with with him. But I think we can course correct with that." I knew right from the start that this was shady. Now it seems I have been vindicated, Dan Bongino has been vindicated, Trump has been vindicated. This was a coordinated attack, most likely by Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes, on the administration.

Jacktron

34,932 views • 4 months ago