Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Apparently this video has been manipulated. Can Blake Bednarz release the original with the metadata, if this is true.

ShaykhSulaiman's profile picture

Sulaiman Ahmed

756,675 subscribers

104,915 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & PolitikBildung
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Blake Bednarz confronting Blake Neff about his Judas Harpole video in this segment is pretty hilarious. Bednarz offers Neff $15,000 to listen to a one hour presentation. Neff says have a lawyer draft it up.
2:59

Blake Bednarz confronting Blake Neff about his Judas Harpole video in this segment is pretty hilarious. Bednarz offers Neff $15,000 to listen to a one hour presentation. Neff says have a lawyer draft it up.

Zach Costello

62,136 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

This Bad Bunny clip that MAGA has been circulating, claiming there was a technical malfunction with the backing track and he was singing out of tune, has been manipulated. I found the original.
0:43

This Bad Bunny clip that MAGA has been circulating, claiming there was a technical malfunction with the backing track and he was singing out of tune, has been manipulated. I found the original.

Blue Georgia

27,300 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

I hate this is the country we're living in now. Apparently the man in this video has been arrested and charged .
2:17

I hate this is the country we're living in now. Apparently the man in this video has been arrested and charged .

🥀_ Imposter_🖕

3,094,365 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

BREAKING! This Charlie Kirk video is some of the BEST evidence we have! 29 Min of NON STOP coverage. 12:13pm to 12:42pm on 9/10/25. Charlie was shot at 12:23:29pm. This has 90% of the answers we need. Each voice, each movement each frame will be dissected! Original video posted by Blake Bednarz on X!
30:15

BREAKING! This Charlie Kirk video is some of the BEST evidence we have! 29 Min of NON STOP coverage. 12:13pm to 12:42pm on 9/10/25. Charlie was shot at 12:23:29pm. This has 90% of the answers we need. Each voice, each movement each frame will be dissected! Original video posted by Blake Bednarz on X!

In2ThinAir

387,569 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Blake Bednarz Blake is right. That button is on the right side of the glass and there is only one button
0:30

Blake Bednarz Blake is right. That button is on the right side of the glass and there is only one button

RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

34,966 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

The original driving video for this shebafoon video has been found. Who did this?! 😅😅
0:38

The original driving video for this shebafoon video has been found. Who did this?! 😅😅

Chimp Geographic

125,745 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

LibertyJ This is a real video, but the viral version has been AI colorized. The original is black & white.
2:09

LibertyJ This is a real video, but the viral version has been AI colorized. The original is black & white.

Chad West

73,722 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

You’ll want to bookmark this. I’ll start with the Baron & Jason interview & then use Jason’s own videos to illustrate his story changing in real time. Note these VIP dates. 9/18/25•“Video is the Original from iPhone” 9/24/25•”Video has been manipulated with missing frames”💡
10:15

You’ll want to bookmark this. I’ll start with the Baron & Jason interview & then use Jason’s own videos to illustrate his story changing in real time. Note these VIP dates. 9/18/25•“Video is the Original from iPhone” 9/24/25•”Video has been manipulated with missing frames”💡

Blake

59,254 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

I cut the ending of Blake stream from last night because what he says about the 3.2GB UVU Review video needs to be heard — and questioned — by everyone following this case. The highest quality recording of the entire event. No independent investigator has the original file. And the metadata raises a question Blake didn't have a genuine answer for. *Let's start with the biggest problem.* On Blake's Mac, the file shows a date of September 9th. The Charlie Kirk event at UVU was September 10th. The video file is dated the day before the event it recorded. When Blake is asked about the Sept 9 date he says "this is the copy.. it was what I downloaded and copied into my iPhoto album." That's not an explanation for a file that predates the event. That's just describing what he did with it. He never gives reasonable explanation for the Sept 9 date. Keli Rabon asks the obvious question: "So, like why would it say Sept 9 is what they are asking?". A commenter originally asked about the date which is seen in the video below. Blake's response: "I have no idea." "I have no idea" is not acceptable when you're the sole custodian of the highest quality recording in a capital murder case. That metadata anomaly can be examined and potentially explained — but only with access to the original 3.2GB file. Which no independent investigator has. Blake claims he "released" the video on X back on November 5th. Technically true. What he released was a version he edited, watermarked, and uploaded to X — which compresses everything. The result? The public got files in the range of 15MB to 600MB. The original is 3.2GB. That's not a release. That's a fraction of the data. For forensic work — acoustic, ballistic, visual — compression destroys exactly the information that matters. Frame-level detail, audio fidelity, embedded metadata. All of it degraded or stripped. His defense: he's not a professional video editor and didn't realize that editing, watermarking, and uploading to social media would degrade the quality. You don't need to be a professional to understand that a 3.2GB file doesn't come out the other end at 15MB without losing almost everything. It gets stranger. Elizabeth from UVU Review contacted Blake and asked him to take the video down. He posted screenshots of that conversation on X. So there's a documented chain of custody complication — UVU Review wants it pulled, Blake had the file, and nobody doing forensic analysis has the original. When pressed on why he won't just release the 3.2GB file, Blake tells people to contact Elizabeth at UVU Review directly. He has the file. He chose to edit it, watermark it, compress it, and upload the degraded version. Now he's redirecting responsibility to someone who asked him to take it down. Then there's the "metadata verification". midGray on X who has been inactive in the investigation for months, supposedly examined the file and concluded there was no intentional tampering. He pulls the video midGRAY made in an attempt to validate himself. Blake says midGray worked from files downloaded from X but also contradicts himself by showing midGRAY also says Blake sent him the original file for which he has screenshots of metadata and was able to examine in hand. Watch the end of this stream. Keli Rabon starts asking the right questions — pointed, specific, reasonable — and Blake visibly checks out. Stops engaging. Gets uncomfortable. That's not what confidence in your own position looks like. This isn't about accusing Blake of anything nefarious, although it is very strange. It's about a simple principle: If you possess the highest quality recording of a capital murder case, and the metadata shows a date that predates the event, and investigators are asking for the original file — you release it. You don't compress it, watermark it, and tell people to ask someone else. Why not just release the original file for investigators to examine Blake ?
14:23

I cut the ending of Blake stream from last night because what he says about the 3.2GB UVU Review video needs to be heard — and questioned — by everyone following this case. The highest quality recording of the entire event. No independent investigator has the original file. And the metadata raises a question Blake didn't have a genuine answer for. *Let's start with the biggest problem.* On Blake's Mac, the file shows a date of September 9th. The Charlie Kirk event at UVU was September 10th. The video file is dated the day before the event it recorded. When Blake is asked about the Sept 9 date he says "this is the copy.. it was what I downloaded and copied into my iPhoto album." That's not an explanation for a file that predates the event. That's just describing what he did with it. He never gives reasonable explanation for the Sept 9 date. Keli Rabon asks the obvious question: "So, like why would it say Sept 9 is what they are asking?". A commenter originally asked about the date which is seen in the video below. Blake's response: "I have no idea." "I have no idea" is not acceptable when you're the sole custodian of the highest quality recording in a capital murder case. That metadata anomaly can be examined and potentially explained — but only with access to the original 3.2GB file. Which no independent investigator has. Blake claims he "released" the video on X back on November 5th. Technically true. What he released was a version he edited, watermarked, and uploaded to X — which compresses everything. The result? The public got files in the range of 15MB to 600MB. The original is 3.2GB. That's not a release. That's a fraction of the data. For forensic work — acoustic, ballistic, visual — compression destroys exactly the information that matters. Frame-level detail, audio fidelity, embedded metadata. All of it degraded or stripped. His defense: he's not a professional video editor and didn't realize that editing, watermarking, and uploading to social media would degrade the quality. You don't need to be a professional to understand that a 3.2GB file doesn't come out the other end at 15MB without losing almost everything. It gets stranger. Elizabeth from UVU Review contacted Blake and asked him to take the video down. He posted screenshots of that conversation on X. So there's a documented chain of custody complication — UVU Review wants it pulled, Blake had the file, and nobody doing forensic analysis has the original. When pressed on why he won't just release the 3.2GB file, Blake tells people to contact Elizabeth at UVU Review directly. He has the file. He chose to edit it, watermark it, compress it, and upload the degraded version. Now he's redirecting responsibility to someone who asked him to take it down. Then there's the "metadata verification". midGray on X who has been inactive in the investigation for months, supposedly examined the file and concluded there was no intentional tampering. He pulls the video midGRAY made in an attempt to validate himself. Blake says midGray worked from files downloaded from X but also contradicts himself by showing midGRAY also says Blake sent him the original file for which he has screenshots of metadata and was able to examine in hand. Watch the end of this stream. Keli Rabon starts asking the right questions — pointed, specific, reasonable — and Blake visibly checks out. Stops engaging. Gets uncomfortable. That's not what confidence in your own position looks like. This isn't about accusing Blake of anything nefarious, although it is very strange. It's about a simple principle: If you possess the highest quality recording of a capital murder case, and the metadata shows a date that predates the event, and investigators are asking for the original file — you release it. You don't compress it, watermark it, and tell people to ask someone else. Why not just release the original file for investigators to examine Blake ?

Troof

46,336 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Blake Bednarz is now offering a $61,000 reward for anyone who can recreate the t-shirt movement we saw during the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
1:33

Blake Bednarz is now offering a $61,000 reward for anyone who can recreate the t-shirt movement we saw during the assassination of Charlie Kirk.

RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

94,359 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Apparently this ninja has been beating his woman, and this is the punishment he's getting. Is it enough though?
0:27

Apparently this ninja has been beating his woman, and this is the punishment he's getting. Is it enough though?

TheeCandid✌🏾

30,004 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨 Deepfake Video Alert A digitally manipulated video of Mohan Bhagwat is circulating online with the false claim that he urged Prime Minister Narendra Modi to saffronize the Indian Army and remove 50% of non-caste Hindus from the force. #PIBFactCheck ✅ This video is #fake & has been digitally altered. 👉 Watch the original, unedited video here: 🔗 ⚠️ Beware! Such manipulated videos are being deliberately shared to mislead the public. 🛑 Help STOP misinformation If you come across such misleading or manipulated content, report it immediately: 📲 WhatsApp: +91 8799711259 📩 Email: factcheck@pib.gov.in
0:29

🚨 Deepfake Video Alert A digitally manipulated video of Mohan Bhagwat is circulating online with the false claim that he urged Prime Minister Narendra Modi to saffronize the Indian Army and remove 50% of non-caste Hindus from the force. #PIBFactCheck ✅ This video is #fake & has been digitally altered. 👉 Watch the original, unedited video here: 🔗 ⚠️ Beware! Such manipulated videos are being deliberately shared to mislead the public. 🛑 Help STOP misinformation If you come across such misleading or manipulated content, report it immediately: 📲 WhatsApp: +91 8799711259 📩 Email: [email protected]

PIB Fact Check

48,459 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

hey guys can someone confirm if these voice actors from this hoyofair video is original voice actors? i have been seeing some comments about it in the hoyofair video
0:23

hey guys can someone confirm if these voice actors from this hoyofair video is original voice actors? i have been seeing some comments about it in the hoyofair video

🪼 ren !

54,100 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Watch this video and see how been original is the best
1:57

Watch this video and see how been original is the best

Entertaining Clips

32,852 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Whatever this is has been achieved internally apparently
0:33

Whatever this is has been achieved internally apparently

Aidan Gomez

20,378 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

A snippet of the original James Blake version of "This One Here" has surfaced online
0:30

A snippet of the original James Blake version of "This One Here" has surfaced online

GoodAssSub

31,387 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Analysis has been ongoing since the public release of this UAP video. In February of 2024 (Pre-dating Skywatcher), James Fowler captured an object that has characteristics aligning with the 3 objects in the UAP video release. More to come on this... James Fowler
0:44

Analysis has been ongoing since the public release of this UAP video. In February of 2024 (Pre-dating Skywatcher), James Fowler captured an object that has characteristics aligning with the 3 objects in the UAP video release. More to come on this... James Fowler

ProPixel Video Analysis and Research

27,940 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten