Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🚨Approaching Ragnarok: The Convergence of Global Flashpoints🚨 Something is moving. The signs are undeniable. In just the last two weeks, we’ve seen a cascade of developments that on their own are extraordinary, but together form a picture of escalation that feels less like politics and more like prelude to...

xAlphaWarriorx's profile picture

ALPHAWARRIOR

131,340 subscribers

18,584 views • 10 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Health & WellnessNews & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 ‼️John Mearsheimer 🚨"FIRED "🚨Donald Trump No signs of quick end to US-Israel war on Iran First of all, this argument that, Iran is a great threat to stability in the Middle East, and a serious threat to the United States is nonsense. The greatest threat to stability in the Middle East is the United States, working closely together, with Israel. Iran has not started a war, in centuries as best I can tell. It's not a highly aggressive country. The country in the Middle East that aggressive is Israel. The country that has, committed genocide in Gaza is not Iran, it's Israel, and we were complicit. We meaning the United States is complicit in genocide. Twice, once last year in June of twenty twenty-five and again on February 28th of this year, the United States and Israel launched unprovoked attacks against Iran. So the idea that Iran is this great destabilizer in the Middle East is a myth that the United States and Israel purvey. The Israelis and the Americans are now doing to deal with this purported Iranian threat, what you see is we've taken measures that have made the situation much worse. In fact, one could argue that we are going to crash the international economy as a result of this war that Israel and the United States started. I would make the argument that we are on the edge of the precipice, in terms of the state of the world economy because of this war. This war shows no, signs of ending anytime soon, and already great damage has been done to the international economy, and more damage will be done the longer the war goes on. So this idea that, number one, Iran is a great threat to the United States is bogus, and number two, the idea that President Trump, and his friends in Israel are making, a safer and more stable Middle East is a ludicrous argument. In fact, what they're doing is they're putting the entire world, on the precipice of a disaster.
2:48

🚨 ‼️John Mearsheimer 🚨"FIRED "🚨Donald Trump No signs of quick end to US-Israel war on Iran First of all, this argument that, Iran is a great threat to stability in the Middle East, and a serious threat to the United States is nonsense. The greatest threat to stability in the Middle East is the United States, working closely together, with Israel. Iran has not started a war, in centuries as best I can tell. It's not a highly aggressive country. The country in the Middle East that aggressive is Israel. The country that has, committed genocide in Gaza is not Iran, it's Israel, and we were complicit. We meaning the United States is complicit in genocide. Twice, once last year in June of twenty twenty-five and again on February 28th of this year, the United States and Israel launched unprovoked attacks against Iran. So the idea that Iran is this great destabilizer in the Middle East is a myth that the United States and Israel purvey. The Israelis and the Americans are now doing to deal with this purported Iranian threat, what you see is we've taken measures that have made the situation much worse. In fact, one could argue that we are going to crash the international economy as a result of this war that Israel and the United States started. I would make the argument that we are on the edge of the precipice, in terms of the state of the world economy because of this war. This war shows no, signs of ending anytime soon, and already great damage has been done to the international economy, and more damage will be done the longer the war goes on. So this idea that, number one, Iran is a great threat to the United States is bogus, and number two, the idea that President Trump, and his friends in Israel are making, a safer and more stable Middle East is a ludicrous argument. In fact, what they're doing is they're putting the entire world, on the precipice of a disaster.

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

73,659 views • 4 months ago

🚨Former Israeli Acting President: ‘Trump needed a SHORT WAR, Netanyahu needed a LONG WAR against Iran. Netanyahu hasn’t profited A THING politically from this war on Iran!’ ‘This war with Iran was a competition between two end dates. Trump had to end it and to finish it before it has an impact on the midterm elections, and therefore it should have been a very short exercise or a manoeuvre. And Netanyahu has to extend it as long as possible because he wants to go into elections in a state of war, because Israelis, when there is a state of war, usually rally around the flag of the government and the flag of the prime minister. So the motivation of what is the role of the war for the internal politics was very different in American internal politics and the Israeli domestic one. It looks to me that, as for now, Netanyahu did not profit a thing politically, internally, from this campaign, maybe lost a lot. And the next elections will show that the Israelis are fed up with both his manipulation, his tricks, his shticks and his endurance. That’s, if you ask me, the very last couple of months of his.’ -Former Israeli Knesset Speaker and former Acting President of Israel Avraham Burg Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇
1:50

🚨Former Israeli Acting President: ‘Trump needed a SHORT WAR, Netanyahu needed a LONG WAR against Iran. Netanyahu hasn’t profited A THING politically from this war on Iran!’ ‘This war with Iran was a competition between two end dates. Trump had to end it and to finish it before it has an impact on the midterm elections, and therefore it should have been a very short exercise or a manoeuvre. And Netanyahu has to extend it as long as possible because he wants to go into elections in a state of war, because Israelis, when there is a state of war, usually rally around the flag of the government and the flag of the prime minister. So the motivation of what is the role of the war for the internal politics was very different in American internal politics and the Israeli domestic one. It looks to me that, as for now, Netanyahu did not profit a thing politically, internally, from this campaign, maybe lost a lot. And the next elections will show that the Israelis are fed up with both his manipulation, his tricks, his shticks and his endurance. That’s, if you ask me, the very last couple of months of his.’ -Former Israeli Knesset Speaker and former Acting President of Israel Avraham Burg Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

Going Underground

33,850 views • 4 months ago

🚨President Trump: The Power our some of this Weaponry is Unthinkable During a Bilateral Meeting today, President Trump told reporters that the U.S. weaponry is capable of ending the Iran war is two seconds flat. He also goes on to to say that what Raytheon and Lockheed are building right now is tremendous and that nobody has seen anything like it. Source:
0:46

🚨President Trump: The Power our some of this Weaponry is Unthinkable During a Bilateral Meeting today, President Trump told reporters that the U.S. weaponry is capable of ending the Iran war is two seconds flat. He also goes on to to say that what Raytheon and Lockheed are building right now is tremendous and that nobody has seen anything like it. Source:

Skywatch Signal

30,390 views • 4 months ago

WATCH: CNN’s Juliette Kayyem seems to blame President Trump waging war on Iran for inciting violence against Jews, including now at a synagogue in Michigan, AND warns of “attacks against Iranian Americans”... “[The sheriff] said specifically in the last two weeks, he has been in contact with federal authorities as well as — as the Jewish community about the heightened threat level. It is something that all of us have been warning about that, you know, this may be a regional war, but it’s going to have global consequences. And one of them is going to be incitement radicalization in particular as Islamic terrorist groups, are utilizing the war like ISIS to go, to go online and to, to lure people to violence. Now is that this specific case? We don’t know.” “But when you asked me, what did I take away from that? I took away the fantastic news and let’s hope it holds that no one but the — the — the assailant was, was — was shot. That is beyond — you know, everyone is incredibly grateful and — and the private security there is likely responsible for that. But the second is, though we’re not hearing much from the federal government on this, neither DHS, FBI, nor the National Counterterrorism Center have issued formal bulletin, what we call a formal intelligence bulletin to law enforcement...[T]he threat environment that people that I talked to right now who are in the state and local world are worried about two things. One, of course what we’ve seen today attacks against the Jewish community and then of course, attacks against Iranian Americans.” “And so, all of that is part of this horrible stew of terrorism and incitement that we live in now in a world online and in a world where, where violence is — is — is too prevalent and so, once again, the fact that the sheriff said two weeks, that’s not a — that’s not a coincidental two weeks. Every — Every law enforcement agent knew or leader knew that this war was going to have consequences in the homeland in ways that — that we are seeing. Well, we don’t that we could be seeing today I’ll be careful, but in ways that we should anticipate the longer this war goes.”
2:37

WATCH: CNN’s Juliette Kayyem seems to blame President Trump waging war on Iran for inciting violence against Jews, including now at a synagogue in Michigan, AND warns of “attacks against Iranian Americans”... “[The sheriff] said specifically in the last two weeks, he has been in contact with federal authorities as well as — as the Jewish community about the heightened threat level. It is something that all of us have been warning about that, you know, this may be a regional war, but it’s going to have global consequences. And one of them is going to be incitement radicalization in particular as Islamic terrorist groups, are utilizing the war like ISIS to go, to go online and to, to lure people to violence. Now is that this specific case? We don’t know.” “But when you asked me, what did I take away from that? I took away the fantastic news and let’s hope it holds that no one but the — the — the assailant was, was — was shot. That is beyond — you know, everyone is incredibly grateful and — and the private security there is likely responsible for that. But the second is, though we’re not hearing much from the federal government on this, neither DHS, FBI, nor the National Counterterrorism Center have issued formal bulletin, what we call a formal intelligence bulletin to law enforcement...[T]he threat environment that people that I talked to right now who are in the state and local world are worried about two things. One, of course what we’ve seen today attacks against the Jewish community and then of course, attacks against Iranian Americans.” “And so, all of that is part of this horrible stew of terrorism and incitement that we live in now in a world online and in a world where, where violence is — is — is too prevalent and so, once again, the fact that the sheriff said two weeks, that’s not a — that’s not a coincidental two weeks. Every — Every law enforcement agent knew or leader knew that this war was going to have consequences in the homeland in ways that — that we are seeing. Well, we don’t that we could be seeing today I’ll be careful, but in ways that we should anticipate the longer this war goes.”

Curtis Houck

25,951 views • 5 months ago

🇺🇸🇻🇪LARA TRUMP: "MADURO KNEW HIS TIME WAS COMING" Lara Trump is calling it the real war on drugs, and says the U.S. strike that captured Maduro was the moment it all came to a head. She claims Maduro knew he was being tracked and that his removal is a major victory not just for Venezuela, but for the U.S. Lara linked Maduro directly to the fentanyl crisis in America and said Venezuelans are crying with joy. "He probably knew he was being tracked by the United States. Trump did not hesitate… we’re also going in on land in Venezuela. It has been a plague on our country that hopefully will come to an end. This president said, this is the real war on drugs. We are crying tears of joy for the fact that this illegitimate dictator is no longer in power. He knew his time was limited and that came to a conclusion overnight." Source: Fox News, The Patriot Oasis™, Lara Trump
2:00

🇺🇸🇻🇪LARA TRUMP: "MADURO KNEW HIS TIME WAS COMING" Lara Trump is calling it the real war on drugs, and says the U.S. strike that captured Maduro was the moment it all came to a head. She claims Maduro knew he was being tracked and that his removal is a major victory not just for Venezuela, but for the U.S. Lara linked Maduro directly to the fentanyl crisis in America and said Venezuelans are crying with joy. "He probably knew he was being tracked by the United States. Trump did not hesitate… we’re also going in on land in Venezuela. It has been a plague on our country that hopefully will come to an end. This president said, this is the real war on drugs. We are crying tears of joy for the fact that this illegitimate dictator is no longer in power. He knew his time was limited and that came to a conclusion overnight." Source: Fox News, The Patriot Oasis™, Lara Trump

Mario Nawfal

136,146 views • 7 months ago

NEW: Fox News’ Bret Baier details where the United States is at in the war against Iran following a call with President Trump. Here are the updates from Trump: - The U.S. is “ahead of where they thought they would be.” - 49 leaders have been taken out. - Trump thinks someone on the ground will rise up. - The leaders were meeting for breakfast when the attack took place. - Trump pointed to “Venezuela as a template.” - “[Trump] does believe that this is going faster than they thought, and he believes that four weeks is something that they had put as a kind of calendar of what they were looking at…”
2:42

NEW: Fox News’ Bret Baier details where the United States is at in the war against Iran following a call with President Trump. Here are the updates from Trump: - The U.S. is “ahead of where they thought they would be.” - 49 leaders have been taken out. - Trump thinks someone on the ground will rise up. - The leaders were meeting for breakfast when the attack took place. - Trump pointed to “Venezuela as a template.” - “[Trump] does believe that this is going faster than they thought, and he believes that four weeks is something that they had put as a kind of calendar of what they were looking at…”

Collin Rugg

356,943 views • 5 months ago

Israeli-British Historian Prof. Avi Shlaim: ‘The Trump-Netanyahu war on Iran is one of the most UNJUSTIFIED, SENSELESS and FOOLISH wars of the 21st century. There was absolutely no reason to go to war. This is an unlawful war. There was no Security Council resolution that mandated a war on Iran. There was no imminent threat from Iran to either Israel or America. So it was a decision taken by these two leaders to launch an attack on Iran. And the dominant personality here is Netanyahu. He’s the junior partner, but he’s the real architect of this war. He succeeded in dragging America into the war on Iran. And remember that Netanyahu was first elected as prime minister in 1996. For the last 30 years, Netanyahu has been demonising Iran and calling for a military strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities. But no American president until Trump was stupid enough to fall for it. Now, Trump went along with this plan by Netanyahu, and we have seen the consequences. It’s been a war that has caused immense damage and destruction, inflicted a lot of suffering on civilians, and not just in Iran, but on Lebanon as well. And at the same time, Israel continues the genocide in Gaza and the ethnic cleansing of the West Bank. So what we are seeing is an Israeli success in dragging America into a war which is damaging to America, damaging to America’s Gulf allies, hugely damaging to the international economy, and undermines international law.’ -Prof. Avi Shlaim, Emeritus Professor of International Relations at the University of Oxford Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇
3:06

Israeli-British Historian Prof. Avi Shlaim: ‘The Trump-Netanyahu war on Iran is one of the most UNJUSTIFIED, SENSELESS and FOOLISH wars of the 21st century. There was absolutely no reason to go to war. This is an unlawful war. There was no Security Council resolution that mandated a war on Iran. There was no imminent threat from Iran to either Israel or America. So it was a decision taken by these two leaders to launch an attack on Iran. And the dominant personality here is Netanyahu. He’s the junior partner, but he’s the real architect of this war. He succeeded in dragging America into the war on Iran. And remember that Netanyahu was first elected as prime minister in 1996. For the last 30 years, Netanyahu has been demonising Iran and calling for a military strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities. But no American president until Trump was stupid enough to fall for it. Now, Trump went along with this plan by Netanyahu, and we have seen the consequences. It’s been a war that has caused immense damage and destruction, inflicted a lot of suffering on civilians, and not just in Iran, but on Lebanon as well. And at the same time, Israel continues the genocide in Gaza and the ethnic cleansing of the West Bank. So what we are seeing is an Israeli success in dragging America into a war which is damaging to America, damaging to America’s Gulf allies, hugely damaging to the international economy, and undermines international law.’ -Prof. Avi Shlaim, Emeritus Professor of International Relations at the University of Oxford Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

Going Underground

32,717 views • 2 months ago

🚨ICYMI, Prof. John Mearsheimer: Iran ‘HOLDS ALL THE CARDS’ in war of attrition against US and Israel ‘President Trump believed, and the Israelis believed, that we could win a quick and decisive victory, that we could decapitate the Iranian regime, give them some shock and awe for the first few days, and the Iranians would throw up their hands and surrender. President Trump and his closest advisors all thought that we would not end up in a long war where these massive problems that are now beginning to surface would face us… But the problem is that President Trump did not have a coherent strategy or a viable strategy for winning a quick victory. And once the war turned into a war of attrition, it turns out that it’s the Iranians, not the Americans and the Israelis, who hold almost all of the cards.’ -Prof. John Mearsheimer, one of the world’s most respected realist International Relations scholars, on the first ever episode of New Order
1:39

🚨ICYMI, Prof. John Mearsheimer: Iran ‘HOLDS ALL THE CARDS’ in war of attrition against US and Israel ‘President Trump believed, and the Israelis believed, that we could win a quick and decisive victory, that we could decapitate the Iranian regime, give them some shock and awe for the first few days, and the Iranians would throw up their hands and surrender. President Trump and his closest advisors all thought that we would not end up in a long war where these massive problems that are now beginning to surface would face us… But the problem is that President Trump did not have a coherent strategy or a viable strategy for winning a quick victory. And once the war turned into a war of attrition, it turns out that it’s the Iranians, not the Americans and the Israelis, who hold almost all of the cards.’ -Prof. John Mearsheimer, one of the world’s most respected realist International Relations scholars, on the first ever episode of New Order

New Order with Afshin Rattansi

28,840 views • 4 months ago

WATCH U.S. National Security Advisor Waltz: Ukraine needs to move toward a partial ceasefire, a permanent ceasefire, and ultimately, an end to this war. What became evident to us in that session was that Zelensky is not ready to discuss peace at all. But here’s the problem—time is not on his side. The conflict cannot continue indefinitely. The patience of the American people is not unlimited. Their wallets are not unlimited, and neither are our stockpiles of munitions, which we need for various contingencies worldwide. The time to negotiate is now. What we’re hearing as alternatives—whether from Democrats or world leaders—is essentially a continuation of grinding, World War I-style trench warfare, which is a meat grinder for people, munitions, and national resources. The president campaigned on ending this war. He was elected to end this war. He will be the peacemaker-in-chief. But it was truly baffling that Zelensky left the White House on Friday without securing a positive outcome. The U.S. and Ukraine could have been bound together economically for a generation. The British are discussing putting troops on the ground with security guarantees. The French are talking about the same. Even NATO Secretary General met with the president just before the Zelensky meeting. This was no ambush—it was an opportunity, a pivotal moment. And I believe President Zelensky did his country a real disservice by failing to seize it. We’ll see where things go from here.
1:33

WATCH U.S. National Security Advisor Waltz: Ukraine needs to move toward a partial ceasefire, a permanent ceasefire, and ultimately, an end to this war. What became evident to us in that session was that Zelensky is not ready to discuss peace at all. But here’s the problem—time is not on his side. The conflict cannot continue indefinitely. The patience of the American people is not unlimited. Their wallets are not unlimited, and neither are our stockpiles of munitions, which we need for various contingencies worldwide. The time to negotiate is now. What we’re hearing as alternatives—whether from Democrats or world leaders—is essentially a continuation of grinding, World War I-style trench warfare, which is a meat grinder for people, munitions, and national resources. The president campaigned on ending this war. He was elected to end this war. He will be the peacemaker-in-chief. But it was truly baffling that Zelensky left the White House on Friday without securing a positive outcome. The U.S. and Ukraine could have been bound together economically for a generation. The British are discussing putting troops on the ground with security guarantees. The French are talking about the same. Even NATO Secretary General met with the president just before the Zelensky meeting. This was no ambush—it was an opportunity, a pivotal moment. And I believe President Zelensky did his country a real disservice by failing to seize it. We’ll see where things go from here.

Polymarket Intel

62,485 views • 1 year ago

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio: After the end of the war, Ukraine has the right to conclude security agreements not only with the United States and European countries. "Any sovereign country in the world has a right to enter into security alliances with other countries. And it's not just NATO; we have such alliances with South Korea, Japan, and other countries have it with each other. Everyone would acknowledge - including, for the first time, the Russian side, under President Trump's sort of pressure or suggestion - that a Ukraine post-conflict has a right to enter into security agreements with other countries. And we will work with our European allies - and non-European countries - to build such a security guarantee. That'll be something that will have to be in place after a peace deal so that Ukraine can feel safe moving forward," he said. The U.S. Secretary of State emphasized that America is no longer providing Ukraine with weapons or money, but is only selling equipment, which is being paid for by European countries. "They are using NATO to buy the weapons and transfer them to Ukraine." Marco Rubio also added that "President Trump is the only leader in the world that can talk to both" President Zelenskyy and Putin and "bring them both to a meeting."
1:36

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio: After the end of the war, Ukraine has the right to conclude security agreements not only with the United States and European countries. "Any sovereign country in the world has a right to enter into security alliances with other countries. And it's not just NATO; we have such alliances with South Korea, Japan, and other countries have it with each other. Everyone would acknowledge - including, for the first time, the Russian side, under President Trump's sort of pressure or suggestion - that a Ukraine post-conflict has a right to enter into security agreements with other countries. And we will work with our European allies - and non-European countries - to build such a security guarantee. That'll be something that will have to be in place after a peace deal so that Ukraine can feel safe moving forward," he said. The U.S. Secretary of State emphasized that America is no longer providing Ukraine with weapons or money, but is only selling equipment, which is being paid for by European countries. "They are using NATO to buy the weapons and transfer them to Ukraine." Marco Rubio also added that "President Trump is the only leader in the world that can talk to both" President Zelenskyy and Putin and "bring them both to a meeting."

Anton Gerashchenko

77,464 views • 11 months ago

'A trilateral meeting will be planned' — Mertz stated that if Putin does not meet with Zelensky, the ball will once again be on the side of the Europeans and Americans. - The US President last week expressed the expectation that a meeting between Zelensky and Putin would take place within two weeks. This deadline expires next weekend. What reaction do you expect from Trump if such a meeting does not take place by next weekend? And what options for action do you have yourself? - Indeed, last week in our presence President Trump spoke on the phone with President Putin. After that, we discussed the results of this call. We jointly expressed the expectation that a meeting between President Zelensky and President Putin would take place within two weeks. Putin considers it appropriate to link this meeting to preliminary conditions which, in the view of Ukraine and in my personal opinion, are completely unacceptable. This again reveals a strategy of delay on the part of Russia. If such a meeting does not take place, as agreed between Trump and Putin, then the ball will again be on our side, that is, with the Europeans and Americans. We will consult again. President Trump then proposed holding a trilateral meeting — between him, Putin, and Zelensky. This would be the logical next step if the agreed meeting does not happen within two weeks. - SK
1:39

'A trilateral meeting will be planned' — Mertz stated that if Putin does not meet with Zelensky, the ball will once again be on the side of the Europeans and Americans. - The US President last week expressed the expectation that a meeting between Zelensky and Putin would take place within two weeks. This deadline expires next weekend. What reaction do you expect from Trump if such a meeting does not take place by next weekend? And what options for action do you have yourself? - Indeed, last week in our presence President Trump spoke on the phone with President Putin. After that, we discussed the results of this call. We jointly expressed the expectation that a meeting between President Zelensky and President Putin would take place within two weeks. Putin considers it appropriate to link this meeting to preliminary conditions which, in the view of Ukraine and in my personal opinion, are completely unacceptable. This again reveals a strategy of delay on the part of Russia. If such a meeting does not take place, as agreed between Trump and Putin, then the ball will again be on our side, that is, with the Europeans and Americans. We will consult again. President Trump then proposed holding a trilateral meeting — between him, Putin, and Zelensky. This would be the logical next step if the agreed meeting does not happen within two weeks. - SK

Zlatti71

35,160 views • 11 months ago

Israeli-British Historian Prof. Avi Shlaim: ‘The Trump-Netanyahu war on Iran is one of the most UNJUSTIFIED, SENSELESS and FOOLISH wars of the 21st century. There was absolutely no reason to go to war. This is an unlawful war. There was no Security Council resolution that mandated a war on Iran. There was no imminent threat from Iran to either Israel or America. So it was a decision taken by these two leaders to launch an attack on Iran. And the dominant personality here is Netanyahu. He’s the junior partner, but he’s the real architect of this war. He succeeded in dragging America into the war on Iran. And remember that Netanyahu was first elected as prime minister in 1996. For the last 30 years, Netanyahu has been demonising Iran and calling for a military strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities. But no American president until Trump was stupid enough to fall for it. Now, Trump went along with this plan by Netanyahu, and we have seen the consequences. It’s been a war that has caused immense damage and destruction, inflicted a lot of suffering on civilians, and not just in Iran, but on Lebanon as well. And at the same time, Israel continues the genocide in Gaza and the ethnic cleansing of the West Bank. So what we are seeing is an Israeli success in dragging America into a war which is damaging to America, damaging to America’s Gulf allies, hugely damaging to the international economy, and undermines international law.’ -Prof. Avi Shlaim, Emeritus Professor of International Relations at the University of Oxford, on Going Underground
3:06

Israeli-British Historian Prof. Avi Shlaim: ‘The Trump-Netanyahu war on Iran is one of the most UNJUSTIFIED, SENSELESS and FOOLISH wars of the 21st century. There was absolutely no reason to go to war. This is an unlawful war. There was no Security Council resolution that mandated a war on Iran. There was no imminent threat from Iran to either Israel or America. So it was a decision taken by these two leaders to launch an attack on Iran. And the dominant personality here is Netanyahu. He’s the junior partner, but he’s the real architect of this war. He succeeded in dragging America into the war on Iran. And remember that Netanyahu was first elected as prime minister in 1996. For the last 30 years, Netanyahu has been demonising Iran and calling for a military strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities. But no American president until Trump was stupid enough to fall for it. Now, Trump went along with this plan by Netanyahu, and we have seen the consequences. It’s been a war that has caused immense damage and destruction, inflicted a lot of suffering on civilians, and not just in Iran, but on Lebanon as well. And at the same time, Israel continues the genocide in Gaza and the ethnic cleansing of the West Bank. So what we are seeing is an Israeli success in dragging America into a war which is damaging to America, damaging to America’s Gulf allies, hugely damaging to the international economy, and undermines international law.’ -Prof. Avi Shlaim, Emeritus Professor of International Relations at the University of Oxford, on Going Underground

Going Underground

22,956 views • 2 months ago

"YOU CAN'T BLUFF A MOUNTAIN RANGE, MR. TRUMP!" Col. Douglas Macgregor [Douglas Macgregor] delivers a blistering - and accurate - assessment of President Trump's war against Iran, warning that Washington was dangerously unprepared for the reality of the initial phase of the war-of-choice against Iran, and the president remains blind to the mountain of challenges that would result for the U.S. should he order the war's resumption. Macgregor argues that “Trump's game of power and coercion on behalf of Israel has failed” and the U.S. is in strategic drift with its war in the Middle East. The U.S. strategy of psychological bluffing has hit a wall against a state that is effectively a “giant fortress surrounded by mountains.” He warns that we are currently using the “wrong instrument” in an effort to subdue Iran, stating bluntly: “we're not organized for (a war like this), we're not trained for it, we're not ready for it" and the blunt reality is, even if we had a field army of a million men, it would still likely fail to topple the regime in Tehran, at the cost of hundreds of thousands of American lives. The matter is all the more absurd given that the *entirity* of the active duty U.S. Army is LESS than half that number. Meaning: the U.S. embarked on a war of choice against a "mountain fortress" of a country, with insufficient combat power to defeat them, while setting unattainable political objectives for the military to try and accomplish. In other words, failure was baked in because of the mismatch. 📺 Watch the full, urgent breakdown on Daniel Davis Deep Dive now. 👉 #IranWar #MiddleEastConflict #DouglasMacgregor #DanielDavis #USStrategy #Geopolitics #NationalSecurity #ForeignPolicy #BreakingNews #Trump #Israel #PersianGulf
2:53

"YOU CAN'T BLUFF A MOUNTAIN RANGE, MR. TRUMP!" Col. Douglas Macgregor [Douglas Macgregor] delivers a blistering - and accurate - assessment of President Trump's war against Iran, warning that Washington was dangerously unprepared for the reality of the initial phase of the war-of-choice against Iran, and the president remains blind to the mountain of challenges that would result for the U.S. should he order the war's resumption. Macgregor argues that “Trump's game of power and coercion on behalf of Israel has failed” and the U.S. is in strategic drift with its war in the Middle East. The U.S. strategy of psychological bluffing has hit a wall against a state that is effectively a “giant fortress surrounded by mountains.” He warns that we are currently using the “wrong instrument” in an effort to subdue Iran, stating bluntly: “we're not organized for (a war like this), we're not trained for it, we're not ready for it" and the blunt reality is, even if we had a field army of a million men, it would still likely fail to topple the regime in Tehran, at the cost of hundreds of thousands of American lives. The matter is all the more absurd given that the *entirity* of the active duty U.S. Army is LESS than half that number. Meaning: the U.S. embarked on a war of choice against a "mountain fortress" of a country, with insufficient combat power to defeat them, while setting unattainable political objectives for the military to try and accomplish. In other words, failure was baked in because of the mismatch. 📺 Watch the full, urgent breakdown on Daniel Davis Deep Dive now. 👉 #IranWar #MiddleEastConflict #DouglasMacgregor #DanielDavis #USStrategy #Geopolitics #NationalSecurity #ForeignPolicy #BreakingNews #Trump #Israel #PersianGulf

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

13,673 views • 3 months ago

🚨BREAKING: TRUMP SAYS ISRAEL MUST IMMEDIATELY STOP THE BOMBING OF GAZA After Donald Trump posted Hamas’ statement which welcomed his administration’s Gaza peace proposal, Trump has now put out a statement via Truth Social ordering Israel to immediately stop the bombing of Gaza. With bated breath, the genocide may finally be coming to an end. The reality of this is the genocide could have been ended a long time ago in the same manner, via a Truth Social post, or at worst a very stern phone call and a threat to withhold military aid. So why is the order from Washington to end the genocide coming now? Perhaps Trump has seen more of the horrific imagery of forced starvation and Israel’s IDF committing war crimes… Or perhaps it is to do with the preparation for a potential second US-Israeli attack on Iran. The military might of the US empire is being rotated back to the Middle East in the same way it was before the first US-Israeli attack on Iran. In a second war with Iran, Iran will not hold back, and perhaps the Trump Administration has calculated that Israel cannot fight a war on two fronts. What next for Israel? A population that overwhelmingly supports apartheid and genocide against Palestinians will be in an outraged frenzy at the thought of not occupying Gaza and ethnically cleansing every Palestinian. Fanatical members of Benjamin Netanyahu’s coalition such as Smotrich and Ben-Gvir will almost certainly oppose any attempts to even slow down the genocide, let alone stop it. Israeli media are already reporting that the Israeli cabinet were shocked by Trump’s positive response to Hamas’ statement. Will Netanyahu, now with his grip on power even more uncertain after Trump’s order, openly disobey Trump and continue bombing Gaza? Or will he pretend to obey for now, and fabricate a pretext later to bomb the peace plan out of existence and restart the horrors? At least two things are clear currently: 1. Benjamin Netanyahu now risks drawing the ire of the majority of the MAGA base, and the US population should he disobey Trump’s order 2. The US and Israel are setting the stage for a potential second war on Iran Perhaps there is finally hope for the starving, exhausted Palestinian survivors in Gaza…but the US and Israel may be about to unleash even more horrific carnage with a second war on Iran.
2:21

🚨BREAKING: TRUMP SAYS ISRAEL MUST IMMEDIATELY STOP THE BOMBING OF GAZA After Donald Trump posted Hamas’ statement which welcomed his administration’s Gaza peace proposal, Trump has now put out a statement via Truth Social ordering Israel to immediately stop the bombing of Gaza. With bated breath, the genocide may finally be coming to an end. The reality of this is the genocide could have been ended a long time ago in the same manner, via a Truth Social post, or at worst a very stern phone call and a threat to withhold military aid. So why is the order from Washington to end the genocide coming now? Perhaps Trump has seen more of the horrific imagery of forced starvation and Israel’s IDF committing war crimes… Or perhaps it is to do with the preparation for a potential second US-Israeli attack on Iran. The military might of the US empire is being rotated back to the Middle East in the same way it was before the first US-Israeli attack on Iran. In a second war with Iran, Iran will not hold back, and perhaps the Trump Administration has calculated that Israel cannot fight a war on two fronts. What next for Israel? A population that overwhelmingly supports apartheid and genocide against Palestinians will be in an outraged frenzy at the thought of not occupying Gaza and ethnically cleansing every Palestinian. Fanatical members of Benjamin Netanyahu’s coalition such as Smotrich and Ben-Gvir will almost certainly oppose any attempts to even slow down the genocide, let alone stop it. Israeli media are already reporting that the Israeli cabinet were shocked by Trump’s positive response to Hamas’ statement. Will Netanyahu, now with his grip on power even more uncertain after Trump’s order, openly disobey Trump and continue bombing Gaza? Or will he pretend to obey for now, and fabricate a pretext later to bomb the peace plan out of existence and restart the horrors? At least two things are clear currently: 1. Benjamin Netanyahu now risks drawing the ire of the majority of the MAGA base, and the US population should he disobey Trump’s order 2. The US and Israel are setting the stage for a potential second war on Iran Perhaps there is finally hope for the starving, exhausted Palestinian survivors in Gaza…but the US and Israel may be about to unleash even more horrific carnage with a second war on Iran.

Afshin Rattansi

81,280 views • 10 months ago

Key meeting of the day. A very important conversation with U.S. Secretary of State and Acting National Security Advisor Marco Rubio — one of the key architects of American foreign policy. Together with Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko, Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council Rustem Umerov, First Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs Sergiy Kyslytsya 🇺🇦, and Ukraine’s Ambassador to the United States Olga Stefanishyna, we discussed preparations for the meeting between the Presidents of Ukraine and the United States, scheduled for this Friday. We exchanged views on what a long-term security architecture should look like — not only for Ukraine but for all of Europe. The leadership of the United States and personally President Donald Trump made peace in the Middle East possible. This is the kind of vision the world — and Ukraine in particular — needs today. We also discussed the steps that could compel Russia to end its war. Thank you, Secretary Marco Rubio. The American people are truly fortunate to have such a strong and principled Secretary of State.
0:20

Key meeting of the day. A very important conversation with U.S. Secretary of State and Acting National Security Advisor Marco Rubio — one of the key architects of American foreign policy. Together with Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko, Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council Rustem Umerov, First Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs Sergiy Kyslytsya 🇺🇦, and Ukraine’s Ambassador to the United States Olga Stefanishyna, we discussed preparations for the meeting between the Presidents of Ukraine and the United States, scheduled for this Friday. We exchanged views on what a long-term security architecture should look like — not only for Ukraine but for all of Europe. The leadership of the United States and personally President Donald Trump made peace in the Middle East possible. This is the kind of vision the world — and Ukraine in particular — needs today. We also discussed the steps that could compel Russia to end its war. Thank you, Secretary Marco Rubio. The American people are truly fortunate to have such a strong and principled Secretary of State.

Andriy Yermak

19,976 views • 10 months ago

‘Israel’s war on the Palestinians and Arabs is NO LONGER A JUST WAR, it will bring about the end of Zionism.’ —Former Chief of Israel’s Shin Bet Admiral Ami Ayalon ‘Our war with the Arabs and the Palestinians started since the beginning of the Zionism, at the end of the 19th century. What I claim is that we won this war. We won this war because in Beirut in 2002, all the Arab League members, they met and they reverse the three no’s of Khartoum, as a result of the Israeli victory in the Six Day War, they met in Khartoum and they come to decide on three no’s: No to recognition, no to negotiation, and no to peace with Israel. It took several years and in 2002 they met again in Beirut and they understand that what they're facing is a new region, new Middle East, a new reality. And they reverse and they decide on the three yes: yes to recognition, yes to conversation and negotiation, and yes to peace with Israel, on the conditions, on the parameters of the UN Security Council resolutions. This is a major victory and we refuse to see our victory...since they accepted our presence, our right to declare a Jewish state in the Middle East, what I claim is that since this moment our war is not a just war anymore. Because what we are fighting for, and we do not understand in Israel, is in order to expand our eastern border, to deny the creation of a Palestinian state and the Palestinian right to self-determination…this is the end of the Zionist dream. Because if we are not majority in our state, we do not have the power and we do not have the right to dictate the culture, the language, the symbols, the way we celebrate our holidays. So in a way we are fighting without understanding that this war will bring the end of Zionist concept.’ Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇
3:16

‘Israel’s war on the Palestinians and Arabs is NO LONGER A JUST WAR, it will bring about the end of Zionism.’ —Former Chief of Israel’s Shin Bet Admiral Ami Ayalon ‘Our war with the Arabs and the Palestinians started since the beginning of the Zionism, at the end of the 19th century. What I claim is that we won this war. We won this war because in Beirut in 2002, all the Arab League members, they met and they reverse the three no’s of Khartoum, as a result of the Israeli victory in the Six Day War, they met in Khartoum and they come to decide on three no’s: No to recognition, no to negotiation, and no to peace with Israel. It took several years and in 2002 they met again in Beirut and they understand that what they're facing is a new region, new Middle East, a new reality. And they reverse and they decide on the three yes: yes to recognition, yes to conversation and negotiation, and yes to peace with Israel, on the conditions, on the parameters of the UN Security Council resolutions. This is a major victory and we refuse to see our victory...since they accepted our presence, our right to declare a Jewish state in the Middle East, what I claim is that since this moment our war is not a just war anymore. Because what we are fighting for, and we do not understand in Israel, is in order to expand our eastern border, to deny the creation of a Palestinian state and the Palestinian right to self-determination…this is the end of the Zionist dream. Because if we are not majority in our state, we do not have the power and we do not have the right to dictate the culture, the language, the symbols, the way we celebrate our holidays. So in a way we are fighting without understanding that this war will bring the end of Zionist concept.’ Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

Going Underground

65,335 views • 17 days ago

Yellowstone creator Taylor Sheridan perfectly encapsulates how the left’s refusal to accept Donald Trump as president is actively eroding the rule of law. He warns that they are setting a very dangerous precedent for the future of America. SHERIDAN: “It’s so dangerous what we’re seeing.” “You can like Trump or not like Trump, it doesn’t...people are going to like presidents and dislike presidents.” “But now, defying the rule of law because he happens to be the head of the federal government and openly defying the government.” “The repercussions of that are going to be, okay, fine, you can’t stand this man, you think he’s a terrible president and you’re not going to follow his laws.” “But that’s the new normal now.” “So when a president gets in that you do support, then the other side — because we’ve established this precedent — they’re just not going to follow his laws either.” “And now we’ve eroded the rule of law.” “And then what happens?”
0:45

Yellowstone creator Taylor Sheridan perfectly encapsulates how the left’s refusal to accept Donald Trump as president is actively eroding the rule of law. He warns that they are setting a very dangerous precedent for the future of America. SHERIDAN: “It’s so dangerous what we’re seeing.” “You can like Trump or not like Trump, it doesn’t...people are going to like presidents and dislike presidents.” “But now, defying the rule of law because he happens to be the head of the federal government and openly defying the government.” “The repercussions of that are going to be, okay, fine, you can’t stand this man, you think he’s a terrible president and you’re not going to follow his laws.” “But that’s the new normal now.” “So when a president gets in that you do support, then the other side — because we’ve established this precedent — they’re just not going to follow his laws either.” “And now we’ve eroded the rule of law.” “And then what happens?”

Overton

374,933 views • 1 month ago

"THE UNITED STATES IS ON THE BRINK OF WAR WITH IRAN" The United States is currently moving additional military reinforcements to the Middle East, amid escalating tensions with Iran. These moves aim to enhance the U.S. defensive posture, protect American forces and interests in the region and provide President Trump with military options if needed. Officials emphasize the deployments are primarily defensive, in response to the risk of Iranian retaliation or further escalation. The U.S. government is unwilling to share the specifics with the media. In contrast, I have no issues with that. The U.S. and Israel are seeking to effectuate a regime change in Iran. Iran's leader, Ayatollah Khamenei, has around 8 to 10 days to flee the country. If he does not comply, he will be eliminated. The question arises as to whether Israel and the US will permit him to exit the country in light of the recent developments in Iran. What are your thoughts?
0:41

"THE UNITED STATES IS ON THE BRINK OF WAR WITH IRAN" The United States is currently moving additional military reinforcements to the Middle East, amid escalating tensions with Iran. These moves aim to enhance the U.S. defensive posture, protect American forces and interests in the region and provide President Trump with military options if needed. Officials emphasize the deployments are primarily defensive, in response to the risk of Iranian retaliation or further escalation. The U.S. government is unwilling to share the specifics with the media. In contrast, I have no issues with that. The U.S. and Israel are seeking to effectuate a regime change in Iran. Iran's leader, Ayatollah Khamenei, has around 8 to 10 days to flee the country. If he does not comply, he will be eliminated. The question arises as to whether Israel and the US will permit him to exit the country in light of the recent developments in Iran. What are your thoughts?

WORLD AT WAR

14,859 views • 6 months ago