Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

📁 Aravind Srinivas, CEO of Perplexity, says AI still doesn’t solve problems on its own. A human always identifies the important question first. No system has ever asked a fundamental question out of curiosity. That spark remains human. AI can solve, optimize, and verify, knowing what’s worth asking is...

JonhernandezIA's profile picture

Jon Hernandez

24,552 subscribers

85,276 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

EğitimBilim & Teknoloji
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

To scale Perplexity, CEO Aravind Srinivas says large models now label, evaluate, and train smaller ones. The system handles millions of queries daily. Human evaluation is no longer the bottleneck. “An AI has to do this job.”
1:03

To scale Perplexity, CEO Aravind Srinivas says large models now label, evaluate, and train smaller ones. The system handles millions of queries daily. Human evaluation is no longer the bottleneck. “An AI has to do this job.”

vitrupo

61,760 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

📁 Aravind Srinivas, CEO of Perplexity, says that the end of Google’s monopoly would come with an AI-native operating system, backed by major phone makers, that breaks free from Android and iOS and removes Google as the default search engine, undermining its core mobile advertising business. Comet is the first step toward that goal.
2:05

📁 Aravind Srinivas, CEO of Perplexity, says that the end of Google’s monopoly would come with an AI-native operating system, backed by major phone makers, that breaks free from Android and iOS and removes Google as the default search engine, undermining its core mobile advertising business. Comet is the first step toward that goal.

Jon Hernandez

81,985 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

"What is P vs NP and how does it relate to human knowledge?" Avi Wigderson (Turing Award & Abel Prize winner): "In a very basic way, all the problems we want to solve are really NP problems. A subset of it is the problems we can solve. So the question of P versus NP is whether we can solve all the problems we want to solve, whether we can know everything we want to know. This is basically about the limits of our knowledge. You can think there is no limit to what we may want to know but I claim that essentially in any human endeavor, what people are searching for have the property that when a solution is found, it is easily recognized. NP are all problems that we can honestly say we really want to solve and P are those that we can solve. Whether they are equal is just the very fact that a solution can be easily recognized would imply that it can be efficiently found. That means that we can know everything we ever want to know, it's a fundamental question about human knowledge."
1:00

"What is P vs NP and how does it relate to human knowledge?" Avi Wigderson (Turing Award & Abel Prize winner): "In a very basic way, all the problems we want to solve are really NP problems. A subset of it is the problems we can solve. So the question of P versus NP is whether we can solve all the problems we want to solve, whether we can know everything we want to know. This is basically about the limits of our knowledge. You can think there is no limit to what we may want to know but I claim that essentially in any human endeavor, what people are searching for have the property that when a solution is found, it is easily recognized. NP are all problems that we can honestly say we really want to solve and P are those that we can solve. Whether they are equal is just the very fact that a solution can be easily recognized would imply that it can be efficiently found. That means that we can know everything we ever want to know, it's a fundamental question about human knowledge."

Ryan Peterman

20,069 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

📁 Sam Altman says that even though building software is now dramatically easier, building a real business is still just as hard. AI removes technical barriers, but it does not solve the scarcest resource, human attention. Even in a world of radical abundance, distribution and focus remain the bottleneck. The edge will not be speed, but creativity and building things that truly matter.
1:21

📁 Sam Altman says that even though building software is now dramatically easier, building a real business is still just as hard. AI removes technical barriers, but it does not solve the scarcest resource, human attention. Even in a world of radical abundance, distribution and focus remain the bottleneck. The edge will not be speed, but creativity and building things that truly matter.

Jon Hernandez

44,084 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

"LM Arena is a cancer on AI. Labs have entire teams dedicated to hacking it." Edwin Chen (echen), CEO of Surge AI, on why the industry's favorite benchmark is broken and how Surge hit $1.2 billion in revenue without ever raising. Aravind Srinivas (Aravind Srinivas), CEO of Perplexity, on Apple's AI advantage, Claude Code economics, the endgame of coding, and Perplexity Computer. They join @jason on This Week in AI Episode 10: 00:00 Intro to Aravind Srinivas and Edwin Chen 05:25 Edwin on Surge: School for AGI 10:47 What Apple's next CEO should do 21:20 "The iPhone is not getting disrupted by AI" 23:55 Bootstrapping Surge past $1B without raising 30:58 Claude Code as a loss leader 33:30 Are we in the endgame for coding? 41:34 30% headcount growth, 5x revenue 50:29 "People don't buy models, they buy products" 58:00 "LM Arena is a cancer on AI" 1:05:41 Model Council and orchestrating frontier models Full episode on YT, Spotify, and Apple Podcasts below: Perplexity Surge AI
1:19:40

"LM Arena is a cancer on AI. Labs have entire teams dedicated to hacking it." Edwin Chen (echen), CEO of Surge AI, on why the industry's favorite benchmark is broken and how Surge hit $1.2 billion in revenue without ever raising. Aravind Srinivas (Aravind Srinivas), CEO of Perplexity, on Apple's AI advantage, Claude Code economics, the endgame of coding, and Perplexity Computer. They join @jason on This Week in AI Episode 10: 00:00 Intro to Aravind Srinivas and Edwin Chen 05:25 Edwin on Surge: School for AGI 10:47 What Apple's next CEO should do 21:20 "The iPhone is not getting disrupted by AI" 23:55 Bootstrapping Surge past $1B without raising 30:58 Claude Code as a loss leader 33:30 Are we in the endgame for coding? 41:34 30% headcount growth, 5x revenue 50:29 "People don't buy models, they buy products" 58:00 "LM Arena is a cancer on AI" 1:05:41 Model Council and orchestrating frontier models Full episode on YT, Spotify, and Apple Podcasts below: Perplexity Surge AI

This Week in AI

40,456 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

LIVE NOW: Aravind Srinivas: Perplexity CEO’s All-In Gamble to Take Down Google Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas joins the show to explore how AI agents, personalization, and new browsing models could transform the internet experience. From replacing mundane workflows with proactive assistance to envisioning a fully AI-native operating system, Aravind shares his long-term vision, the thinking behind placeholder's browser, and why curiosity will remain humanity’s most valuable skill in the AI era. -------------- TIMESTAMPS 0:00 Intro 9:58 Curiosity as the Key Human Advantage 15:26 From Keywords to Questions 21:35 Personalization and Agency in Browsing 27:13 Keeping Humans in the Loop 32:30 Why People Love Perplexity 38:35 Comet - The AI Browser 47:24 The Browser vs. Agent Debate 57:16 Competing with Big Tech 1:01:26 The OS Endgame 1:08:48 Closing Thoughts
1:09:40

LIVE NOW: Aravind Srinivas: Perplexity CEO’s All-In Gamble to Take Down Google Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas joins the show to explore how AI agents, personalization, and new browsing models could transform the internet experience. From replacing mundane workflows with proactive assistance to envisioning a fully AI-native operating system, Aravind shares his long-term vision, the thinking behind placeholder's browser, and why curiosity will remain humanity’s most valuable skill in the AI era. -------------- TIMESTAMPS 0:00 Intro 9:58 Curiosity as the Key Human Advantage 15:26 From Keywords to Questions 21:35 Personalization and Agency in Browsing 27:13 Keeping Humans in the Loop 32:30 Why People Love Perplexity 38:35 Comet - The AI Browser 47:24 The Browser vs. Agent Debate 57:16 Competing with Big Tech 1:01:26 The OS Endgame 1:08:48 Closing Thoughts

Bankless

51,482 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Jensen Huang says AI is a Questioning System. It’s not about the answer. it’s about the quality of your question. Don't let it think for you, let it solve the impossible with you.
0:57

Jensen Huang says AI is a Questioning System. It’s not about the answer. it’s about the quality of your question. Don't let it think for you, let it solve the impossible with you.

SciTech Era

13,484 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

$PLTR CEO Alex Karp said Palantir’s “secret to sales” is hoping customers LLM companies first and realize “they don’t care about you at all.” Frontier AI Models solve real problems but create even bigger ones while Palantir gives customers the ontology layer to solve those problems and “own the means of production.”
1:18

$PLTR CEO Alex Karp said Palantir’s “secret to sales” is hoping customers LLM companies first and realize “they don’t care about you at all.” Frontier AI Models solve real problems but create even bigger ones while Palantir gives customers the ontology layer to solve those problems and “own the means of production.”

Shay Boloor

60,313 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Mistral CEO Arthur Mensch on why AGI is too simple of a concept: “There’s no such thing as one system that is going to be solving all of the problems of the world... It’s never going to exist.” “Just like you don't have any human that is able to solve every task in the world, you of course have to have some level of specialization to actually solve problems.” “We are back from magical thinking to system thinking.” “In real life enterprises are just complex systems. You can’t solve that with a single abstraction, which is AGI.” Arthur Mensch on Big Technology Podcast
1:05

Mistral CEO Arthur Mensch on why AGI is too simple of a concept: “There’s no such thing as one system that is going to be solving all of the problems of the world... It’s never going to exist.” “Just like you don't have any human that is able to solve every task in the world, you of course have to have some level of specialization to actually solve problems.” “We are back from magical thinking to system thinking.” “In real life enterprises are just complex systems. You can’t solve that with a single abstraction, which is AGI.” Arthur Mensch on Big Technology Podcast

a16z

37,667 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

🇺🇸 ELON: SYMBIOSIS WITH AI CAN KEEP HUMANITY RELEVANT Host: "What's your vision for a society where human effort is no longer required for survival or productivity? How do we avoid irrelevance?" Elon: "That’s the central question. If we become symbiotic with AI, merging human and machine intelligence, we may solve the relevance problem. Just like riding a bike or driving a car makes you superhuman in speed, AI can amplify our capabilities. That doesn’t make running irrelevant, and people still run. Humans working with machines has always raised these debates. It happened with the steam engine and the steam shovel. The best idea I have is interwoven human-machine intelligence. With something like Neuralink, we can augment our minds and become one with AI." Source: Tesla Owners Silicon Valley
2:13

🇺🇸 ELON: SYMBIOSIS WITH AI CAN KEEP HUMANITY RELEVANT Host: "What's your vision for a society where human effort is no longer required for survival or productivity? How do we avoid irrelevance?" Elon: "That’s the central question. If we become symbiotic with AI, merging human and machine intelligence, we may solve the relevance problem. Just like riding a bike or driving a car makes you superhuman in speed, AI can amplify our capabilities. That doesn’t make running irrelevant, and people still run. Humans working with machines has always raised these debates. It happened with the steam engine and the steam shovel. The best idea I have is interwoven human-machine intelligence. With something like Neuralink, we can augment our minds and become one with AI." Source: Tesla Owners Silicon Valley

Mario Nawfal

95,081 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

AI has the IQ of a genius. And the memory of a goldfish. That’s why today’s AI still feels frustrating. But here’s the question nobody’s asking… What happens when AI remembers everything about you? And more importantly… Who owns that memory? Day 321.
4:27

AI has the IQ of a genius. And the memory of a goldfish. That’s why today’s AI still feels frustrating. But here’s the question nobody’s asking… What happens when AI remembers everything about you? And more importantly… Who owns that memory? Day 321.

Eric Jackson

36,066 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

This thread reminded me of Thiel's take on biology and the excuses of biologists for why we aren't solving hard problems (I have a biology background and work as a scientist and still agree with him). My take is that AI won't solve biology, but it will help us understand it at a deeper level. Saying that it is impossible is a lazy take. Saying that AI will solve all problems is a lazy take too. There is an in-between where AI will support and help scientists move things forward. I am really tired of the excuses of the gatekeeper boomer scientists and the hype of the AI bros.
1:42

This thread reminded me of Thiel's take on biology and the excuses of biologists for why we aren't solving hard problems (I have a biology background and work as a scientist and still agree with him). My take is that AI won't solve biology, but it will help us understand it at a deeper level. Saying that it is impossible is a lazy take. Saying that AI will solve all problems is a lazy take too. There is an in-between where AI will support and help scientists move things forward. I am really tired of the excuses of the gatekeeper boomer scientists and the hype of the AI bros.

Linden

67,241 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

I can’t say why the system has rejected Drizzy but what I can say is that there is no question that it has rejected him. The real question I have is… who’s running the system? And why did Colin Kaepernick have to sign a NDA to get his money? And why does Michael Jackson family still not have control of his assets? And…. that’s enough question… I don’t want any problems…
2:53

I can’t say why the system has rejected Drizzy but what I can say is that there is no question that it has rejected him. The real question I have is… who’s running the system? And why did Colin Kaepernick have to sign a NDA to get his money? And why does Michael Jackson family still not have control of his assets? And…. that’s enough question… I don’t want any problems…

Django

18,886 görüntüleme • 27 gün önce

Elon Musk says that by the end of this year, AI will solve digital human emulation A "digital remote worker" that can do anything involving moving electrons or improving human productivity That's the ceiling before robots "once you have physical robots, the limit is physics itself"
1:30

Elon Musk says that by the end of this year, AI will solve digital human emulation A "digital remote worker" that can do anything involving moving electrons or improving human productivity That's the ceiling before robots "once you have physical robots, the limit is physics itself"

Haider.

19,164 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

📁 Demis Hassabis, CEO of DeepMind, says AI is still missing critical capabilities. He explains that current systems cannot plan far ahead or reason like top human scientists, because they lack a deep model of the world. They can process text, images, and video, but they still don’t understand physics, causality, or how actions affect outcomes over time.
1:00

📁 Demis Hassabis, CEO of DeepMind, says AI is still missing critical capabilities. He explains that current systems cannot plan far ahead or reason like top human scientists, because they lack a deep model of the world. They can process text, images, and video, but they still don’t understand physics, causality, or how actions affect outcomes over time.

Jon Hernandez

63,723 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Terence Tao says humans will keep pushing the mathematical frontier, while AI scales the millions of medium-difficulty problems no one has time to solve. This kind of coverage quietly accelerates scientific progress. “As long as you only use the AIs to the extent that you can verify the outputs, and no further, then they can be a great tool.”
1:37

Terence Tao says humans will keep pushing the mathematical frontier, while AI scales the millions of medium-difficulty problems no one has time to solve. This kind of coverage quietly accelerates scientific progress. “As long as you only use the AIs to the extent that you can verify the outputs, and no further, then they can be a great tool.”

vitrupo

38,656 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Mark Zuckerberg says AI has no will of its own. “The AI system has no impulse or desire… it sits there, it waits for you to give it directions.” The future depends entirely on human intent and the values we choose to amplify. Source: Rowan Cheung
1:02

Mark Zuckerberg says AI has no will of its own. “The AI system has no impulse or desire… it sits there, it waits for you to give it directions.” The future depends entirely on human intent and the values we choose to amplify. Source: Rowan Cheung

a16z

100,763 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce