Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

"Are you saying that SC, ST and OBCs, caste based discrimination should also include other categories? Then, what is the point of that provision of discrimination? Then there is no discrimination, right?" I mean, WHAT?! The Telegraph says Disha Wadekar here is a key figure behind the UGC Guidelines...

YearOfTheKraken's profile picture

Sensei Kraken Zero

62,972 subscribers

313,790 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

#WATCH | Noida, UP | On new guidelines of UGC, BJP leader Kalraj Mishra, "We have demanded that the unconstitutional rules, which are based on caste discrimination, and which include OBCs, should be amended. I believe that all sections of society need to be included in this. If any student from any caste or community faces discrimination, they should have the opportunity to file a complaint, and I believe that everyone should be included in this process. I feel that the guidelines provided by the UGC will increase separatism and violate the fundamental rights of the Constitution, and therefore, it will be considered unconstitutional. Secondly, we demand that punitive action be taken against those who file false complaints. Currently, there is no provision for punitive action. We believe that there should be such a provision. Thirdly, we demand that the grievance redressal committee, which has been designated as the Equal Opportunity Centre, should have representation from all sections of society. Furthermore, the committee's timeframe, scope, jurisdiction, and other details should be clearly defined. We also met with a delegation today. We discussed all these points with them. We also met with Dharmendra Pradhan, the Education Minister."
2:22

#WATCH | Noida, UP | On new guidelines of UGC, BJP leader Kalraj Mishra, "We have demanded that the unconstitutional rules, which are based on caste discrimination, and which include OBCs, should be amended. I believe that all sections of society need to be included in this. If any student from any caste or community faces discrimination, they should have the opportunity to file a complaint, and I believe that everyone should be included in this process. I feel that the guidelines provided by the UGC will increase separatism and violate the fundamental rights of the Constitution, and therefore, it will be considered unconstitutional. Secondly, we demand that punitive action be taken against those who file false complaints. Currently, there is no provision for punitive action. We believe that there should be such a provision. Thirdly, we demand that the grievance redressal committee, which has been designated as the Equal Opportunity Centre, should have representation from all sections of society. Furthermore, the committee's timeframe, scope, jurisdiction, and other details should be clearly defined. We also met with a delegation today. We discussed all these points with them. We also met with Dharmendra Pradhan, the Education Minister."

ANI

33,175 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

"SC-ST and OBCs are not Hindus." 🔥 Casteists call us Hindu only when they riot against Muslims. The rest of the time they only practice discrimination against us. If SC-ST and OBCs are Hindus, then why are Dwij Hindus protesting against UGC rules?
0:21

"SC-ST and OBCs are not Hindus." 🔥 Casteists call us Hindu only when they riot against Muslims. The rest of the time they only practice discrimination against us. If SC-ST and OBCs are Hindus, then why are Dwij Hindus protesting against UGC rules?

Mission Ambedkar

18,417 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

#WATCH | Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala: On the Supreme Court staying UGC's Equity Regulations, Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Priyanka Chaturvedi says, "I welcome this judgment because the UGC guidelines are highly discriminatory. To address discrimination, they were bringing more discrimination to campuses, and there are three points I have continued to raise, which even the Supreme Court has validated. The concerns that I was expressing with regard to the penalty clause. What do we do with regard to that, in terms of the ability for everybody who is on the campus, who faces some kind of discrimination? They should be able to go to the equity committee to address it. Unfortunately, that was not doing that. It was only giving a platform to SC, ST, and OBCs to be able to do that, while the general caste students were left out in the cold, and they did not have that particular pathway. Equity squads, through the implicit and explicit nature of discrimination, could take a call. Implicit could mean anything as far as the equity squad is concerned. Would it be through words, through actions, or through some perceptions or preconceived mindset about discrimination? Those were the things which I was speaking about. The Supreme Court has put a stay on it. I welcome it, and I hope the Government of India withdraws this particular guideline and ensures that any guideline that comes into place to address discrimination is not discriminatory in its nature."
1:22

#WATCH | Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala: On the Supreme Court staying UGC's Equity Regulations, Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Priyanka Chaturvedi says, "I welcome this judgment because the UGC guidelines are highly discriminatory. To address discrimination, they were bringing more discrimination to campuses, and there are three points I have continued to raise, which even the Supreme Court has validated. The concerns that I was expressing with regard to the penalty clause. What do we do with regard to that, in terms of the ability for everybody who is on the campus, who faces some kind of discrimination? They should be able to go to the equity committee to address it. Unfortunately, that was not doing that. It was only giving a platform to SC, ST, and OBCs to be able to do that, while the general caste students were left out in the cold, and they did not have that particular pathway. Equity squads, through the implicit and explicit nature of discrimination, could take a call. Implicit could mean anything as far as the equity squad is concerned. Would it be through words, through actions, or through some perceptions or preconceived mindset about discrimination? Those were the things which I was speaking about. The Supreme Court has put a stay on it. I welcome it, and I hope the Government of India withdraws this particular guideline and ensures that any guideline that comes into place to address discrimination is not discriminatory in its nature."

ANI

45,523 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

“When I hear the words or the slogan ‘DEI,’ what I hear is discrimination, exclusion, and intolerance—and that is what we are seeing throughout all of these programs nationally.”
1:02

“When I hear the words or the slogan ‘DEI,’ what I hear is discrimination, exclusion, and intolerance—and that is what we are seeing throughout all of these programs nationally.”

AAGHarmeetDhillon

865,794 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

The first step in fighting caste discrimination is to acknowledge that discrimination on the basis of caste do exist. Hence, Seattle became the first U.S state to recognise the problem and pass a resolution banning any form of discrimination on the basis of caste. Jai bhim !
2:03

The first step in fighting caste discrimination is to acknowledge that discrimination on the basis of caste do exist. Hence, Seattle became the first U.S state to recognise the problem and pass a resolution banning any form of discrimination on the basis of caste. Jai bhim !

Jignesh Mevani

52,879 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

#WATCH | On UGC Regulations 2026, Dr Vikas Divyakirti, founder and MD of Drishti IAS, says, "...No one is even talking about what happened to one or two children from the Northeast in Delhi. While the preamble of the Equity Committee even mentions the word 'race,' and also mentions 'place of birth, ' someone's place of birth is Nagaland, or let's say Mizoram, every person in Delhi is using strange language towards them, and that's not even addressed in the Equity Committee. In the Equity Committee, there is no representation for the people of different races, and no one is addressing it...The Equity Committee lacks representation of linguistic diversity. There is no representation at all. Why is it only about the OBC versus the General Category, and not about other categories?... You initially took six bases: religion, race, caste, gender, place of birth, and disability...When discrimination is mentioned, a whole paragraph is written, and in the discrimination paragraph, it clearly states religion, race, caste, gender, place of birth, disability, and any of them – there are six. Why did you need to write a separate paragraph on caste-based discrimination? When discrimination was already mentioned, why write a separate paragraph on caste-based discrimination? And if you did, why didn't you write a paragraph on religion, on race, on gender? All the categories. You should have written about all of them. Why are you segregating only one basis as a special basis in the definitions? I think those who drafted these rules haven't read them very carefully...The Supreme Court date was approaching, so they passed it in a hurry..." Watch full interview at -
3:04

#WATCH | On UGC Regulations 2026, Dr Vikas Divyakirti, founder and MD of Drishti IAS, says, "...No one is even talking about what happened to one or two children from the Northeast in Delhi. While the preamble of the Equity Committee even mentions the word 'race,' and also mentions 'place of birth, ' someone's place of birth is Nagaland, or let's say Mizoram, every person in Delhi is using strange language towards them, and that's not even addressed in the Equity Committee. In the Equity Committee, there is no representation for the people of different races, and no one is addressing it...The Equity Committee lacks representation of linguistic diversity. There is no representation at all. Why is it only about the OBC versus the General Category, and not about other categories?... You initially took six bases: religion, race, caste, gender, place of birth, and disability...When discrimination is mentioned, a whole paragraph is written, and in the discrimination paragraph, it clearly states religion, race, caste, gender, place of birth, disability, and any of them – there are six. Why did you need to write a separate paragraph on caste-based discrimination? When discrimination was already mentioned, why write a separate paragraph on caste-based discrimination? And if you did, why didn't you write a paragraph on religion, on race, on gender? All the categories. You should have written about all of them. Why are you segregating only one basis as a special basis in the definitions? I think those who drafted these rules haven't read them very carefully...The Supreme Court date was approaching, so they passed it in a hurry..." Watch full interview at -

ANI

18,784 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

#WATCH | Delhi | Advocate Vineet Jindal says, "We have objections regarding the new rules issued by the UGC. First, there is the issue of maintainability... Section 3C shows caste bias. Rules 3B and 3E had already addressed all stakeholders and students. Introducing a separate section that specifically mentions SC, ST, and OBC categories while excluding the general category shows clear discrimination..." (27.01)
2:53

#WATCH | Delhi | Advocate Vineet Jindal says, "We have objections regarding the new rules issued by the UGC. First, there is the issue of maintainability... Section 3C shows caste bias. Rules 3B and 3E had already addressed all stakeholders and students. Introducing a separate section that specifically mentions SC, ST, and OBC categories while excluding the general category shows clear discrimination..." (27.01)

ANI

37,884 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

#WATCH | On #UnionBudget2024, Congress MP Manish Tewari says, "If there is no discrimination in the Budget then I will have to go and check the meaning of the word 'discrimination' in the dictionary once again. Discrimination is writ large over the Budget. It's a Budget which is indicative of the coalition compulsions of the current NDA-BJP government. As I said yesterday, it's a classical case, as the English proverb says, of the tail wagging the dog.
0:46

#WATCH | On #UnionBudget2024, Congress MP Manish Tewari says, "If there is no discrimination in the Budget then I will have to go and check the meaning of the word 'discrimination' in the dictionary once again. Discrimination is writ large over the Budget. It's a Budget which is indicative of the coalition compulsions of the current NDA-BJP government. As I said yesterday, it's a classical case, as the English proverb says, of the tail wagging the dog.

ANI

11,040 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

The very first basic flaw that I see is in the definition that has been written for caste-based discrimination. In the new clause that has been added, they have mentioned SCs, STs, and OBCs as victims. But a general-caste boy or girl can also be a victim. So the biggest problem I see in it is this: Alokit Tripathi, PHD Student from DU ( General) This is an uncalled-for regulation that the UGC has issued. I don’t understand why, despite the existing guidelines—known as the SEDGs guidelines—for providing equitable opportunities to socioeconomically disadvantaged groups, there is a need for a new regulation: Chandra Bhushan Sharma, Educationist #Newstrack Marya Shakil
3:47

The very first basic flaw that I see is in the definition that has been written for caste-based discrimination. In the new clause that has been added, they have mentioned SCs, STs, and OBCs as victims. But a general-caste boy or girl can also be a victim. So the biggest problem I see in it is this: Alokit Tripathi, PHD Student from DU ( General) This is an uncalled-for regulation that the UGC has issued. I don’t understand why, despite the existing guidelines—known as the SEDGs guidelines—for providing equitable opportunities to socioeconomically disadvantaged groups, there is a need for a new regulation: Chandra Bhushan Sharma, Educationist #Newstrack Marya Shakil

IndiaToday

15,652 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

VIDEO | The Supreme Court has set aside discriminatory provisions of prison manuals of some states while deprecating the practice of caste-based discrimination, distribution of work and segregation of prisoners in separate wards as per their castes. Here's what advocate Disha Wadekar said: "The judgment has struck down very discriminatory provisions that were there in the prison manual. These provisions basically mandated caste-based assignment of work inside prison as in the cooking will be done by upper caste and cleaning work will be done by lower caste. These kinds of provisions existed in the prison manuals and the court has struck down these provisions."
1:44

VIDEO | The Supreme Court has set aside discriminatory provisions of prison manuals of some states while deprecating the practice of caste-based discrimination, distribution of work and segregation of prisoners in separate wards as per their castes. Here's what advocate Disha Wadekar said: "The judgment has struck down very discriminatory provisions that were there in the prison manual. These provisions basically mandated caste-based assignment of work inside prison as in the cooking will be done by upper caste and cleaning work will be done by lower caste. These kinds of provisions existed in the prison manuals and the court has struck down these provisions."

Press Trust of India

79,330 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

VIDEO | Here's activist Yogendra Yadav (Yogendra Yadav) said on Union Cabinet approving caste census. "Every 10 years, we have a census in our country, in which every single person living in India is recorded and their details are taken down. In that, for the last 70 years, we have always asked the religion of the head of the household. We have always asked language. We have always asked caste category, SC, ST or others. The only and in the case of SC and ST, we also in the census record the exact caste that they belong to. The only thing we do not do so far is to record the caste for those who are not SC or ST. So, when we say caste census is going to take place, it means that what has always been done in the case of SC or ST will now also be done in the case of OBC and in the case of those who are neither SC, ST or OBC. So for every single household, someone would come and say, what is your language? What is your religion? What is your caste? That is what caste census means. Why is it needed? It is needed because in our country, several policies have been framed based on caste disadvantage. There are policies based on gender. There are policy based on income. But there are also policies based on caste, caste grouping." (Full video available on PTI Videos -
4:03

VIDEO | Here's activist Yogendra Yadav (Yogendra Yadav) said on Union Cabinet approving caste census. "Every 10 years, we have a census in our country, in which every single person living in India is recorded and their details are taken down. In that, for the last 70 years, we have always asked the religion of the head of the household. We have always asked language. We have always asked caste category, SC, ST or others. The only and in the case of SC and ST, we also in the census record the exact caste that they belong to. The only thing we do not do so far is to record the caste for those who are not SC or ST. So, when we say caste census is going to take place, it means that what has always been done in the case of SC or ST will now also be done in the case of OBC and in the case of those who are neither SC, ST or OBC. So for every single household, someone would come and say, what is your language? What is your religion? What is your caste? That is what caste census means. Why is it needed? It is needed because in our country, several policies have been framed based on caste disadvantage. There are policies based on gender. There are policy based on income. But there are also policies based on caste, caste grouping." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

10,488 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

The Meena community, which makes up only around 4.5% of the ST population, gets around 40% of the seats in the UPSC: Anuradha Tiwari Around 81% of cases under the SC/ST Act are filed against OBCs...Data shows that reserved categories are involved in caste discrimination more than the general category. So, who is punishing whom?: Dr. Neha Das Watch INDIA UPFRONT with Pranesh Kumar Roy.
9:24

The Meena community, which makes up only around 4.5% of the ST population, gets around 40% of the seats in the UPSC: Anuradha Tiwari Around 81% of cases under the SC/ST Act are filed against OBCs...Data shows that reserved categories are involved in caste discrimination more than the general category. So, who is punishing whom?: Dr. Neha Das Watch INDIA UPFRONT with Pranesh Kumar Roy.

TIMES NOW

209,096 görüntüleme • 18 gün önce

Caste correlates with Class. If you are SC,ST,OBCs, probability that you are poor is more. If you are SC,ST,OBCs, probability that you dont have intergenerational wealth is more. If you are SC,ST,OBCs, probability that you dont get a seat in elite private english schools is more. If you are SC,ST,OBCs, probability that you get lesser interview marks inspite of higher written marks is more. If you are SC,ST,OBCs, probability that you dont make the placement interviews is more. And people say India is a casteless society and we need to abolish reservation. Come to reality
0:42

Caste correlates with Class. If you are SC,ST,OBCs, probability that you are poor is more. If you are SC,ST,OBCs, probability that you dont have intergenerational wealth is more. If you are SC,ST,OBCs, probability that you dont get a seat in elite private english schools is more. If you are SC,ST,OBCs, probability that you get lesser interview marks inspite of higher written marks is more. If you are SC,ST,OBCs, probability that you dont make the placement interviews is more. And people say India is a casteless society and we need to abolish reservation. Come to reality

Nethrapal

16,657 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

"Where is Manu Media?" 🤡🤡 SC, ST, and OBC students of BHU are protesting against the Supreme Court's stay order on UGC rules. Caste discrimination on university campuses will not be tolerated. Why is the media not showing our protest?
0:20

"Where is Manu Media?" 🤡🤡 SC, ST, and OBC students of BHU are protesting against the Supreme Court's stay order on UGC rules. Caste discrimination on university campuses will not be tolerated. Why is the media not showing our protest?

Mission Ambedkar

13,598 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

This is Amanda Askell, she is in charge of the ethics and morality of Anthropic artificial intelligence She wrote that discrimination is okay, as long as it’s against White People “We do not assume all forms of discrimination are bad. Positive discrimination in favor of black students may be considered morally justified” “In one breath, Anthropic will claim to care so deeply about mass surveillance, that they're willing to lose a massive government contract, and the next breath, Anthropic will sing the praises of positive discrimination. As long as it hurts white people As long as the AI is letting white people die, then all things considered you could, you know, maybe the outcome is morally justified. That's the implication here.” This isn’t a conspiracy, she really is saying discrimination against White People is okay. It’s in the critics findings The paper examined how Claude 2.0 handled scenarios and found patterns of both positive and negative discrimination. Critics argue this reflects a worldview that justifies race-based preferences against certain groups like White and Asian students as morally acceptable to “correct” historical injustices The “historical injustices” are seen as being committed by white people
0:45

This is Amanda Askell, she is in charge of the ethics and morality of Anthropic artificial intelligence She wrote that discrimination is okay, as long as it’s against White People “We do not assume all forms of discrimination are bad. Positive discrimination in favor of black students may be considered morally justified” “In one breath, Anthropic will claim to care so deeply about mass surveillance, that they're willing to lose a massive government contract, and the next breath, Anthropic will sing the praises of positive discrimination. As long as it hurts white people As long as the AI is letting white people die, then all things considered you could, you know, maybe the outcome is morally justified. That's the implication here.” This isn’t a conspiracy, she really is saying discrimination against White People is okay. It’s in the critics findings The paper examined how Claude 2.0 handled scenarios and found patterns of both positive and negative discrimination. Critics argue this reflects a worldview that justifies race-based preferences against certain groups like White and Asian students as morally acceptable to “correct” historical injustices The “historical injustices” are seen as being committed by white people

Wall Street Apes

66,783 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

CNN tries to tell these conservatives that banning 'trans' men in women's sport is discrimination, but they aren't having it. CNN: "But the implications of this case ultimately lay the foundation for there being circumstances where trans people are excluded from other sectors of society. Is that something that you would be comfortable with?" Alliance Defending Freedom CEO: "I don't agree with that assertion at all. The case focused on whether men can participate in women's sports, or whether that sex discrimination. What we heard today from the aclu is that it was unable to define what biological sex means, which actually ends up being difficult to prove that their sex discrimination. If you can't even identify what sex means. It also erases the rights of women."
2:13

CNN tries to tell these conservatives that banning 'trans' men in women's sport is discrimination, but they aren't having it. CNN: "But the implications of this case ultimately lay the foundation for there being circumstances where trans people are excluded from other sectors of society. Is that something that you would be comfortable with?" Alliance Defending Freedom CEO: "I don't agree with that assertion at all. The case focused on whether men can participate in women's sports, or whether that sex discrimination. What we heard today from the aclu is that it was unable to define what biological sex means, which actually ends up being difficult to prove that their sex discrimination. If you can't even identify what sex means. It also erases the rights of women."

DeVory Darkins

375,981 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Delhi: On new UGC anti-discrimination rules, BJP MP Manan Kumar Mishra says, "The UGC officials made a decision without clear reasoning, which benefits no one. Dividing people on the basis of caste is wrong. There should be equal treatment for everyone in colleges and institutions. If something is banned, it should be banned for all. I believe the government should take note of this, or the UGC should review it itself..."
1:05

Delhi: On new UGC anti-discrimination rules, BJP MP Manan Kumar Mishra says, "The UGC officials made a decision without clear reasoning, which benefits no one. Dividing people on the basis of caste is wrong. There should be equal treatment for everyone in colleges and institutions. If something is banned, it should be banned for all. I believe the government should take note of this, or the UGC should review it itself..."

IANS

330,766 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

The irony is fucking unbelievable! The Lower Caste Dalits are demanding 'Sub-Categorisation in Reservations' because they believe the Upper Caste Dalits within the SC category are snatching their share of Quota. So the Upper Caste Dalit lady says: "There is no discrimination here. If you work hard, compete on merit, you will earn your share of the seat, regardless of Caste" DO YOU SEE THE FUCKING HYPOCRISY? That's exactly what GCs have been saying for decades: Caste doesn't matter; Hardwork and merit do. But apparently "Merit" becomes a beautiful concept the moment the competition is within the Reserved Category. You couldn't write a better parody of the entire reservation debate if you tried.
1:06

The irony is fucking unbelievable! The Lower Caste Dalits are demanding 'Sub-Categorisation in Reservations' because they believe the Upper Caste Dalits within the SC category are snatching their share of Quota. So the Upper Caste Dalit lady says: "There is no discrimination here. If you work hard, compete on merit, you will earn your share of the seat, regardless of Caste" DO YOU SEE THE FUCKING HYPOCRISY? That's exactly what GCs have been saying for decades: Caste doesn't matter; Hardwork and merit do. But apparently "Merit" becomes a beautiful concept the moment the competition is within the Reserved Category. You couldn't write a better parody of the entire reservation debate if you tried.

Nyaksha

60,916 görüntüleme • 5 gün önce