Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

👀 Arena Breakout: Infinite x Resident Evil 4 Remake collaboration teaser is here. Arena Breakout: Infinite is a free-to-play tactical extraction shooter for PC, where players enter combat zones, collect loot, and escape alive. 📆The collaboration begins July 24.

118,457 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

This is getting seriously interesting again. $BTC dumped from $82,300 to $78,600 this weekend liquidating $1.4B! But this is the important bit: In Friday's post I said $80,000 was the key breakout level and losing it would bring the huge liquidity below into play. That’s exactly what happened. Bitcoin now has roughly $2.3B liquidity below between $76,500 - $78,500 versus $2.3B above between $80,500 - $83,000. This means the HTF liquidity has just been reset and is perfectly balanced, with no clear advantage on either side. On the LTF, the largest liquidity zones sit around $78,400 - $78,900 below and $79,900 - $81,000 above, which makes it likely these levels get swept today. Whales are still showing huge demand from $78,000 - $79,000 to buy the dip, while large sell walls remain stacked above $80,000 until $83,000. This means buyers are defending underneath, but Bulls still have a lot of supply to clear before I trust another breakout. Meanwhile, spot demand has weakened again and Coinbase Premium remains negative, while OI is only starting to rebuild and futures traders have shifted back towards buying. This means leverage is returning, but I still want to see stronger spot demand before becoming Bullish again. So to make things simple for you: - $79k - $80k support failed over the weekend - $78.6k downside sweep played out - $78.9k and $79.9k are the two LTF zones - HTF liquidity is now perfectly balanced - Reclaim $80k-$81k and Bulls regain control; lose $78.4k and I favour another sweep lower I’ll post any changes to my positioning and the key levels I’m watching in the free Telegram (link in bio).

CryptoReviewing

126,143 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce

Hexagons and Octagons Those who follow football and coaching will be well aware that there are trends that emerge and become the great break through in coaching, only to vanish quite quickly. A few stick around and become a staple. Such as the rondo, or the 4v4+4 Guardiola rondo variation. One that did not stick around in the coaching collective consciousness that possible should have was Thomas Tuchel’s use of hexagonal and octagonal playing areas in training sessions. Tuchel explained that cutting off the corners and angling the pitch forced “sharp diagonal” passes that would help break the press. The positioning of players outside the hexagon/octagon or players close to the edges will be manipulated into an open body shape by the angles of the pitch. Players are impacted by environmental constraints and embodied cognition, where the geography of the playing area influences their actions. This influence spreads to the creation of triangles and diamonds within the playing area due to the “funnel” like nature of the playing area. We can use the cut outside angles by placing bounce or target players on the exterior, influencing the movement and organisation internally. The inside players will not have to move wide as those areas are occupied. The internal players will seek to create passing angles using the positioning of the outside players and their internal team mates. The diamonds and triangles will appear. If we leave the spaces on the outside empty players can move to fill the spaces. These act as free spaces to receive from the goalkeeper or open spaces for attackers to overlap into, encouraging attacking combination play and crosses. A different way of using the space is to remove goals and goalkeepers from the ends and place bounce/target players on the outside. Players now can combine with the outside players, when they do so they are then free to finish into the outside goals. The condition can be extended to combining with the target player in the opposite side of the pitch before scoring, adding an element of switching play. The hexagon and octagon are versatile spaces that help to replicate aspects of the game. By funneling the spaces we impact players body shape, ability to play forward quickly, team shape (or small group shapes), players cutting in, defending centrally, the types of combination used and the angles of line breaking pass (diagonals). The angles are hugely significant for teams that value combinations and possession football, Straight passes and receiving angles are much easier to intercept and carry high risks for being counter attacked. Short diagonals can bypass players and attacking shapes, creating angled connections. If an angles pass is given away there is still a risk of being counter attacked but there is more chance of having players around the ball to regain possession. To counter press. The question that emerges is should we then be using hexagons and octagons more? If they are of greater benefit than squares and rectangles, why use them? Should all pitches, including those of a small sided nature be hexagonal? Can the rondo square be replaced by the rondo octagon?

TheBeardedCoach

13,461 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce