正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Argument between two young men, as one insisted he doesn’t believe in chasing women and feels it’s not worth it, while the other argued that it is worth it and encouraged going for what you want. The first said, “In the days of our forefathers, men didn’t apply so... show more

CHUKS 🍥

175,025 subscribers

27,210 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

“We welcome competition from opposition in Abia State. Any opposition party is free to apply for any location they want in Abia State for campaign, as long as they pay the required fee. Once you pay, I will make the venue available for you. It is now left for the people of Abia State to decide who they want to follow. The days of panic are gøne. Sometimes you pay for a venue and you are later prevented from using it, that is panic. If you know what you are doing, you should not be panicking.” — Governor Alex Otti

“We welcome competition from opposition in Abia State. Any opposition party is free to apply for any location they want in Abia State for campaign, as long as they pay the required fee. Once you pay, I will make the venue available for you. It is now left for the people of Abia State to decide who they want to follow. The days of panic are gøne. Sometimes you pay for a venue and you are later prevented from using it, that is panic. If you know what you are doing, you should not be panicking.” — Governor Alex Otti

CHUKS 🍥

162,682 次观看 • 1 个月前

Men who have no intention of marrying you will waste as much of your time as you let them waste. A man who loves you doesn’t have to be convinced of anything. If he’s not marrying you it’s because he doesn’t want to marry you. Specifically you. He’s already decided on it, he’s just getting as much from you as he can. It is not selfish of you to want marriage and it’s not okay for a man to make you feel that way. Men will easily give a woman they love all of the things the last woman felt she had to beg for. Do not try to convince men to love you and don’t let an uncommitted boyfriend stop you from finding a committed husband.

Men who have no intention of marrying you will waste as much of your time as you let them waste. A man who loves you doesn’t have to be convinced of anything. If he’s not marrying you it’s because he doesn’t want to marry you. Specifically you. He’s already decided on it, he’s just getting as much from you as he can. It is not selfish of you to want marriage and it’s not okay for a man to make you feel that way. Men will easily give a woman they love all of the things the last woman felt she had to beg for. Do not try to convince men to love you and don’t let an uncommitted boyfriend stop you from finding a committed husband.

Echo 🔆

145,409 次观看 • 2 年前

I can’t believe a person you would put your trust into, marry them, have kids with them and they can do this to you! And then have the nerve to get mad when we choose the bear. It’s really sicko and weird. Would you want this to happen to your daughter or sister or mother? I’m at a lost for words. For the men who say they are our allies, you have a lot of work to do. Men who get offended by this it’s because you know what men are actually capable of. Either you are them or so ashamed you don’t want to admit it. But it doesn’t stop it from happening. Damn damn damn. 🤦🏾‍♀️🤦🏾‍♀️🤦🏾‍♀️🤦🏾‍♀️ I just wish we had the same strength as men cause this would be a different story. And for the ones who think “not all men” you are a very big part of the problem. You definitely know a man who is. Talk to the women in your life they will tell you or like he said they may not cause they just don’t trust you enough to do so. 🤦🏾‍♀️🤦🏾‍♀️🤦🏾‍♀️🤦🏾‍♀️🤦🏾‍♀️🤦🏾‍♀️

I can’t believe a person you would put your trust into, marry them, have kids with them and they can do this to you! And then have the nerve to get mad when we choose the bear. It’s really sicko and weird. Would you want this to happen to your daughter or sister or mother? I’m at a lost for words. For the men who say they are our allies, you have a lot of work to do. Men who get offended by this it’s because you know what men are actually capable of. Either you are them or so ashamed you don’t want to admit it. But it doesn’t stop it from happening. Damn damn damn. 🤦🏾‍♀️🤦🏾‍♀️🤦🏾‍♀️🤦🏾‍♀️ I just wish we had the same strength as men cause this would be a different story. And for the ones who think “not all men” you are a very big part of the problem. You definitely know a man who is. Talk to the women in your life they will tell you or like he said they may not cause they just don’t trust you enough to do so. 🤦🏾‍♀️🤦🏾‍♀️🤦🏾‍♀️🤦🏾‍♀️🤦🏾‍♀️🤦🏾‍♀️

Leslie Jones 🦋

261,633 次观看 • 1 年前

The Maasai tribe from Africa teaching the world "What is a woman" Matt Walsh travels to Africa to ask local villagers about transgenderism and if their notions of gender are as fluid as in the West. He asks the Maasai Tribe "What is a Woman?". What they tell Matt is different from many of the so called “experts” who couldn't answer the Question "There are things a woman can do that a man cannot, and things men can do that women cannot, hence, we have been created equally but different to ‘supplement’ each other by being what the other is not" ~ Maasai Tribe Elder "if you want to become a lady but you are a man, you have something wrong with you ..." ~ Maasai One of the Maasai Men asked the translator in Maasai language "is this guy insane or what?" They were clearly holding back laughter out of kindness. As soon as Matt left they told all their friends back home and laughed at the outside world. This is the first time in the Documentary Film Matt looks so afraid not to offend people! And as someone from Africa, I can assure you that they were thinking what the hell is wrong with this man is he insane or what? Before the translator could finish the last question, the whole crowd was laughing. It is as if Matt proved to the Maasai tribe that the outside world is crazy. Your comments on this

The Maasai tribe from Africa teaching the world "What is a woman" Matt Walsh travels to Africa to ask local villagers about transgenderism and if their notions of gender are as fluid as in the West. He asks the Maasai Tribe "What is a Woman?". What they tell Matt is different from many of the so called “experts” who couldn't answer the Question "There are things a woman can do that a man cannot, and things men can do that women cannot, hence, we have been created equally but different to ‘supplement’ each other by being what the other is not" ~ Maasai Tribe Elder "if you want to become a lady but you are a man, you have something wrong with you ..." ~ Maasai One of the Maasai Men asked the translator in Maasai language "is this guy insane or what?" They were clearly holding back laughter out of kindness. As soon as Matt left they told all their friends back home and laughed at the outside world. This is the first time in the Documentary Film Matt looks so afraid not to offend people! And as someone from Africa, I can assure you that they were thinking what the hell is wrong with this man is he insane or what? Before the translator could finish the last question, the whole crowd was laughing. It is as if Matt proved to the Maasai tribe that the outside world is crazy. Your comments on this

African Hub

80,770 次观看 • 1 年前

“As a country, we know ourselves as we are. What other lessons, then, would you still need, beyond what you have seen, what you have gone through, and the consequences of those experiences? To our young people, many of whom are here today, I ask you this: wherever you go in the world, whatever you see, whatever you admire, never think of trying to leap away from who you are and becoming something else you saw elsewhere. It does not last. And even if it did last, it would be like living without truly existing. This is rooted in what we believe, and this applies even in matters of religious faith, but it is also rooted in culture. When your culture is replaced by trying to copy what you saw elsewhere, it is destructive and it does not endure. We must therefore guard against that, and instead look for ways to develop what is ours, where it is not good, we change it and make it better, but always building on the foundation of who we are.” President Kagame | National Prayer Breakfast.

“As a country, we know ourselves as we are. What other lessons, then, would you still need, beyond what you have seen, what you have gone through, and the consequences of those experiences? To our young people, many of whom are here today, I ask you this: wherever you go in the world, whatever you see, whatever you admire, never think of trying to leap away from who you are and becoming something else you saw elsewhere. It does not last. And even if it did last, it would be like living without truly existing. This is rooted in what we believe, and this applies even in matters of religious faith, but it is also rooted in culture. When your culture is replaced by trying to copy what you saw elsewhere, it is destructive and it does not endure. We must therefore guard against that, and instead look for ways to develop what is ours, where it is not good, we change it and make it better, but always building on the foundation of who we are.” President Kagame | National Prayer Breakfast.

Presidency | Rwanda

24,234 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨 HOLY CRAP! Tish Hyman GRILLS Rep. Ro Khanna (D) to his face on supporting men in women's bathrooms. "Listen to me. Women and men are NOT the same. There's NO such thing as a TRANS!" Tish is the same woman kicked out of Gold's Gym for exposing they let MEN in the women's locker rooms. "You need to open up this bill and protect WOMEN! NONE of the women here are protected by state law!" "I'm not a Democrat or Republican. I AM A WOMAN, who is a lesbian...a lot of this is going on and YOU need to do something about it. Republicans will back you on it. DEMOCRATS need to do something. TRANS ARE NOT WOMEN. THEY ARE MEN." 📽️ WomenAreReal

🚨 HOLY CRAP! Tish Hyman GRILLS Rep. Ro Khanna (D) to his face on supporting men in women's bathrooms. "Listen to me. Women and men are NOT the same. There's NO such thing as a TRANS!" Tish is the same woman kicked out of Gold's Gym for exposing they let MEN in the women's locker rooms. "You need to open up this bill and protect WOMEN! NONE of the women here are protected by state law!" "I'm not a Democrat or Republican. I AM A WOMAN, who is a lesbian...a lot of this is going on and YOU need to do something about it. Republicans will back you on it. DEMOCRATS need to do something. TRANS ARE NOT WOMEN. THEY ARE MEN." 📽️ WomenAreReal

Eric Daugherty

178,729 次观看 • 7 个月前

“Your generosity conceals something dirtier and meaner.” A wife saying this to her husband is a reminder to men to treat marriage as one of your least, and highest-risk, investments. An investment which, if it collapses, leaves you unshaken; and if it does not collapse, remains sustainable. And therefore, prioritize investments in self-sufficiency. Amass enough value and resources that only a portion of it when committed to marriage, suffices - while the remainder, if the marriage fails, insulates you from ruin. Most marriages fail partly because men are too little sufficient for the amount of stake they make. Men risk failing. And When men fail, marriages fail. And when marriage fails, the man fails the woman. Because a woman, I Will tell you, is often with the man because of the marriage, not in the marriage because of the man. For women, marriage is often the goal, not the man. The man is a means. And when marriage fails, that means has, in her eyes, proven useless. She rages. And with that, the man’s peace is alienated. You must not fail. Because your failure can become the marriage’s failure. For in your incapacity, the security marriage guaranteed your wife is threatened. And women’s attraction plummets where security diminishes. Then it matters less how much you have sacrificed, how much security you once guaranteed, your dreams, or even your potential to recover. What matters is the impending doom your failure appears to announce - the threat to her security. And with that, her survival. And as a naturally and spiritually dependent species, which woman is, you, the man, lose utility when you are no longer dependable. And consequently, lose respect, grace and companion. The whole point I am belabouring is this: Men, do not delude yourselves with the “for better or worse” myth and invest excessively in marriage. Invest in it with only a minimal percentage of your value, as you would any other high-risk investment. Be so self-sufficient before marriage that you can run your home on a harmless and mildly percentage of your finances. Marry a woman who poses less threat to your finances, peace, and emotional stability. Make marriage one of the smallest running investments in your portfolio. Because when you invest too much of yourself in marriage, you relinquish more profitable parts of your existence for something as low-profit and uncertain as marriage. Again and for the last time, Invest little enough in marriage that its collapse cannot collapse you. For a man who places too much of himself in marriage does builds a vulnerability not a union.

“Your generosity conceals something dirtier and meaner.” A wife saying this to her husband is a reminder to men to treat marriage as one of your least, and highest-risk, investments. An investment which, if it collapses, leaves you unshaken; and if it does not collapse, remains sustainable. And therefore, prioritize investments in self-sufficiency. Amass enough value and resources that only a portion of it when committed to marriage, suffices - while the remainder, if the marriage fails, insulates you from ruin. Most marriages fail partly because men are too little sufficient for the amount of stake they make. Men risk failing. And When men fail, marriages fail. And when marriage fails, the man fails the woman. Because a woman, I Will tell you, is often with the man because of the marriage, not in the marriage because of the man. For women, marriage is often the goal, not the man. The man is a means. And when marriage fails, that means has, in her eyes, proven useless. She rages. And with that, the man’s peace is alienated. You must not fail. Because your failure can become the marriage’s failure. For in your incapacity, the security marriage guaranteed your wife is threatened. And women’s attraction plummets where security diminishes. Then it matters less how much you have sacrificed, how much security you once guaranteed, your dreams, or even your potential to recover. What matters is the impending doom your failure appears to announce - the threat to her security. And with that, her survival. And as a naturally and spiritually dependent species, which woman is, you, the man, lose utility when you are no longer dependable. And consequently, lose respect, grace and companion. The whole point I am belabouring is this: Men, do not delude yourselves with the “for better or worse” myth and invest excessively in marriage. Invest in it with only a minimal percentage of your value, as you would any other high-risk investment. Be so self-sufficient before marriage that you can run your home on a harmless and mildly percentage of your finances. Marry a woman who poses less threat to your finances, peace, and emotional stability. Make marriage one of the smallest running investments in your portfolio. Because when you invest too much of yourself in marriage, you relinquish more profitable parts of your existence for something as low-profit and uncertain as marriage. Again and for the last time, Invest little enough in marriage that its collapse cannot collapse you. For a man who places too much of himself in marriage does builds a vulnerability not a union.

Mr Sergio

13,014 次观看 • 2 个月前

They want to promote the idea that women should get #equal rights- but at the same time they are clearly showing that a woman is weak and is not able to handle it. They are showing as if women are pregnant for lifetime?

They want to promote the idea that women should get #equal rights- but at the same time they are clearly showing that a woman is weak and is not able to handle it. They are showing as if women are pregnant for lifetime?

ShoneeKapoor

169,582 次观看 • 11 个月前

The natural progression of women wanting to copy men is that British Vogue article. The crux of it is that women are jealous of other women being in relationships while they are not, and they use the masculine “boss babe” agenda to hide that fact. Make them believe the latter to deny the former. So it is the collective way for unsuccessful women to shame those who are successful in their personal lives. Women who are winning will then be influenced into believing that something is wrong with them. The single-female-friend-group self-sabotage is now operating on a grand scale through the networking effect of social media. Another example of the female self-stirring “shitshow” the more we give them a voice. The opposite is not true for men, as men are judged on their accomplishments first and foremost. If a man makes his whole or main identity being a husband, he is falling for the feminine value matrix through association in mating. This is how women are currently trying to frame men as accessories - as evidence of their own success, the same way men do with trophy wives. The copying here happens when women don’t want to come across as “less than” within a relationship, because we have entered a matriarchal and gynocratic society where the approval of other women outweighs the approval of the man they are with. This is further evidence of why “husband material” is an insult toward a man and an early sign of his future emasculation by her, in the same way women are being made to feel. Another effort of the mainstream is to eliminate any degree of polarity between the genders.

The natural progression of women wanting to copy men is that British Vogue article. The crux of it is that women are jealous of other women being in relationships while they are not, and they use the masculine “boss babe” agenda to hide that fact. Make them believe the latter to deny the former. So it is the collective way for unsuccessful women to shame those who are successful in their personal lives. Women who are winning will then be influenced into believing that something is wrong with them. The single-female-friend-group self-sabotage is now operating on a grand scale through the networking effect of social media. Another example of the female self-stirring “shitshow” the more we give them a voice. The opposite is not true for men, as men are judged on their accomplishments first and foremost. If a man makes his whole or main identity being a husband, he is falling for the feminine value matrix through association in mating. This is how women are currently trying to frame men as accessories - as evidence of their own success, the same way men do with trophy wives. The copying here happens when women don’t want to come across as “less than” within a relationship, because we have entered a matriarchal and gynocratic society where the approval of other women outweighs the approval of the man they are with. This is further evidence of why “husband material” is an insult toward a man and an early sign of his future emasculation by her, in the same way women are being made to feel. Another effort of the mainstream is to eliminate any degree of polarity between the genders.

French OG

37,506 次观看 • 8 个月前

Why are so many young people single these days? Pooja Arora (Pooja Arora): So my last question: I wanted to talk about why people are single nowadays. I would have asked about human nature, but that’s for another day. I sent you an article—how do you think common knowledge fits into that area? Why do you think so many youngsters are single? Me: Yes, it’s a good question. I’m not sure that common knowledge is an important part of the answer, but some of it is that women no longer depend on the economic contributions of men for their livelihood, as was true, say, in my mother’s era, when women were not professionally trained. To pay the rent, they had to be married. Now, not only are women better educated, but the economy has shifted to favor the kinds of skills that women, as opposed to men, have. And just as women have been rising, men have been sinking because of the decline in blue-collar work. There have also been cultural trends that favor women’s temperaments. Men have been distracted by internet gaming, gambling, and pornography and are less desirable as marriage partners. Women with more economic power are more likely to raise their standards for what they want in a man. In my parents’ generation, it was not uncommon for a woman to marry a man with much less education and, sometimes, less intelligence. This was not unusual among my parents’ friends. The men often had a high school degree and then went immediately into a small business—sometimes a family business, sometimes one he started himself. The criterion was: does he make a living? No one cared about education. That has changed, with the result that there are fewer men who satisfy the criteria women now have. This was mentioned in the article you shared with me. Also, with more sexual freedom, people don’t have to get married simply to have sex, which was again true in my parents’ generation. There’s a process that has been in place since the baby boomers and has accelerated among millennials and Generation Z. For other reasons, I think a generation of men may also be incapable of socially skilled interaction, partly because they’ve grown up with screens instead of face-to-face contact. There is some fear that a sexual encounter could result in an accusation of rape or sexual harassment. There is so much pornography that, for an increasing number of men, it serves as an outlet for what in the past would have required actual human contact. There are many factors. The article from The Economist lists them, I think, quite skillfully. It’s not clear how to reverse the trend. Increasing the economic prospects of men and creating an educational system that is less feminized and more encouraging of male achievement might help. Another could be changing norms—and here common knowledge comes in. Among women, is it a sign of low status to be with a man who has less education than you? Men, from time immemorial, have been happy to marry women with less education than themselves. Women don't. That immediately reduces the marriage pool. Maybe that’s a norm that could change. Go back to the norm in my parents’ generation? Pooja Arora: No, let’s not do that. Me: Okay, let's not do that. Pooja Arora: We’re happy to marry men who are not as educated as us. It’s fine. They just have to be nice and kind at this point in time. Me: Well, yes—exactly. Nice and kind.

Why are so many young people single these days? Pooja Arora (Pooja Arora): So my last question: I wanted to talk about why people are single nowadays. I would have asked about human nature, but that’s for another day. I sent you an article—how do you think common knowledge fits into that area? Why do you think so many youngsters are single? Me: Yes, it’s a good question. I’m not sure that common knowledge is an important part of the answer, but some of it is that women no longer depend on the economic contributions of men for their livelihood, as was true, say, in my mother’s era, when women were not professionally trained. To pay the rent, they had to be married. Now, not only are women better educated, but the economy has shifted to favor the kinds of skills that women, as opposed to men, have. And just as women have been rising, men have been sinking because of the decline in blue-collar work. There have also been cultural trends that favor women’s temperaments. Men have been distracted by internet gaming, gambling, and pornography and are less desirable as marriage partners. Women with more economic power are more likely to raise their standards for what they want in a man. In my parents’ generation, it was not uncommon for a woman to marry a man with much less education and, sometimes, less intelligence. This was not unusual among my parents’ friends. The men often had a high school degree and then went immediately into a small business—sometimes a family business, sometimes one he started himself. The criterion was: does he make a living? No one cared about education. That has changed, with the result that there are fewer men who satisfy the criteria women now have. This was mentioned in the article you shared with me. Also, with more sexual freedom, people don’t have to get married simply to have sex, which was again true in my parents’ generation. There’s a process that has been in place since the baby boomers and has accelerated among millennials and Generation Z. For other reasons, I think a generation of men may also be incapable of socially skilled interaction, partly because they’ve grown up with screens instead of face-to-face contact. There is some fear that a sexual encounter could result in an accusation of rape or sexual harassment. There is so much pornography that, for an increasing number of men, it serves as an outlet for what in the past would have required actual human contact. There are many factors. The article from The Economist lists them, I think, quite skillfully. It’s not clear how to reverse the trend. Increasing the economic prospects of men and creating an educational system that is less feminized and more encouraging of male achievement might help. Another could be changing norms—and here common knowledge comes in. Among women, is it a sign of low status to be with a man who has less education than you? Men, from time immemorial, have been happy to marry women with less education than themselves. Women don't. That immediately reduces the marriage pool. Maybe that’s a norm that could change. Go back to the norm in my parents’ generation? Pooja Arora: No, let’s not do that. Me: Okay, let's not do that. Pooja Arora: We’re happy to marry men who are not as educated as us. It’s fine. They just have to be nice and kind at this point in time. Me: Well, yes—exactly. Nice and kind.

Steven Pinker

89,071 次观看 • 5 个月前

We are living in a time where more men are being more vocal about their feelings which many women have said they have wanted for a long time. However, some women are struggling with accepting what men have to say when it comes to them having to accept that all relationship problems are not caused by men. This is not meant to be an attack on women but many women take it as an attack and are way more interested in defending women than actually understanding what men are trying to say. It tends to be more challenging for women to emotionally regulate and to accept accountability, not because they are flawed, but because of the conditioning and training that has taught women that men are less intelligent and more than often the problem. Quality men, which there are plenty of but are often overlooked and not talked about, are tired of being blamed for everything and are no longer willing to tolerate it. They want to make it clear that most men are not like the stereotypical bs that our society teaches about men. It has been challenging because it's difficult for many women to accept because of their personal experiences from choosing and dealing with lesser quality men.

We are living in a time where more men are being more vocal about their feelings which many women have said they have wanted for a long time. However, some women are struggling with accepting what men have to say when it comes to them having to accept that all relationship problems are not caused by men. This is not meant to be an attack on women but many women take it as an attack and are way more interested in defending women than actually understanding what men are trying to say. It tends to be more challenging for women to emotionally regulate and to accept accountability, not because they are flawed, but because of the conditioning and training that has taught women that men are less intelligent and more than often the problem. Quality men, which there are plenty of but are often overlooked and not talked about, are tired of being blamed for everything and are no longer willing to tolerate it. They want to make it clear that most men are not like the stereotypical bs that our society teaches about men. It has been challenging because it's difficult for many women to accept because of their personal experiences from choosing and dealing with lesser quality men.

Tamorah Shareef Muhammad

12,429,157 次观看 • 2 年前

Due to the Australian sex discrimination commissioners interpretation of the law women are having to: • Go to the high court to reestablish that we are still included in the legislation that was created specifically for us • Lesbians have to go to a tribunal for a second time to reestablish that heterosexual men are not lesbians • A woman is being dragged through a state tribunal for saying that men who claim to be women cannot breastfeed • Women are losing both employment & volunteer positions for asserting the *fact* that men are not women • A woman is appealing a $95,000 fine for using publicly available information to inform people that there are men in women’s sport • Women are being threatened with punishment if they don’t compete with the men in sport • School aged girls are not drinking water at school - or not attending at all for the week of their period - so they don’t have to use unisex bathrooms • Women currently & formally in prison are revealing the sexual assaults they have experienced due to men who claim to be women locked in cells with them The current *interpretation* of Australia’s sex discrimination act - accepted by the full federal court for reasons known only to them - is not creating less discrimination. In fact, it’s creating much more. Interestingly, it’s simultaneously proving that everyone knows exactly who the women & girls actually are, because we’re the ones being punished. Gender ideology has failed and is being rejected in almost every other country it attempted to thrive within. It has brought down the careers of many politicians who didn’t have the metaphorical balls to acknowledge reality and fix the problem. To think that Australian is any different is as ignorant as it is insane. This is not a “culture war”, Anthony Albanese. It’s a war on women & girls.

Due to the Australian sex discrimination commissioners interpretation of the law women are having to: • Go to the high court to reestablish that we are still included in the legislation that was created specifically for us • Lesbians have to go to a tribunal for a second time to reestablish that heterosexual men are not lesbians • A woman is being dragged through a state tribunal for saying that men who claim to be women cannot breastfeed • Women are losing both employment & volunteer positions for asserting the fact that men are not women • A woman is appealing a $95,000 fine for using publicly available information to inform people that there are men in women’s sport • Women are being threatened with punishment if they don’t compete with the men in sport • School aged girls are not drinking water at school - or not attending at all for the week of their period - so they don’t have to use unisex bathrooms • Women currently & formally in prison are revealing the sexual assaults they have experienced due to men who claim to be women locked in cells with them The current interpretation of Australia’s sex discrimination act - accepted by the full federal court for reasons known only to them - is not creating less discrimination. In fact, it’s creating much more. Interestingly, it’s simultaneously proving that everyone knows exactly who the women & girls actually are, because we’re the ones being punished. Gender ideology has failed and is being rejected in almost every other country it attempted to thrive within. It has brought down the careers of many politicians who didn’t have the metaphorical balls to acknowledge reality and fix the problem. To think that Australian is any different is as ignorant as it is insane. This is not a “culture war”, Anthony Albanese. It’s a war on women & girls.

Sall Grover

78,634 次观看 • 1 个月前

I never buy women drinks… I never give women free rides… I never buy women gifts… I never sacrifice my resources in anyway for women… And while I’m considered kind and do freely give, I learnt to never to give my resources to women because I learnt quickly from them that they view men who spend on them as fools. To women, it doesn’t matter if your kindness as a man, is done with no ulterior motive, if she’s not giving you something tangible in return she views you as a fool. Men on the other hand, view themselves as charitable and wise for spending their scarce resources on women who see them as fools for spending money on them. Except you’re a simp with low self-esteem, the only reason you should be spending on a woman is if she’s sacrificed heavily for you and/or if you’re 100% sure she would do the same for you. Before you curse a whore, stone a simp.

Sensitive content

I never buy women drinks… I never give women free rides… I never buy women gifts… I never sacrifice my resources in anyway for women… And while I’m considered kind and do freely give, I learnt to never to give my resources to women because I learnt quickly from them that they view men who spend on them as fools. To women, it doesn’t matter if your kindness as a man, is done with no ulterior motive, if she’s not giving you something tangible in return she views you as a fool. Men on the other hand, view themselves as charitable and wise for spending their scarce resources on women who see them as fools for spending money on them. Except you’re a simp with low self-esteem, the only reason you should be spending on a woman is if she’s sacrificed heavily for you and/or if you’re 100% sure she would do the same for you. Before you curse a whore, stone a simp.

Taiwo_junzi

43,917 次观看 • 3 个月前

Harris Faulkner: “So you believe men and women are the same? You don’t believe in science?” Marie Harf: “Those two questions are different.” Harris Faulkner: “No, actually they are not.” Marie Harf: “Of course I believe in science. [The Democratic Party] is the one that believes in science when it comes to COVID and vaccines and all those things.” Jeremy Hunt: “But not biological s*x— that’s the problem that so many of us have.” “It’s about having clarity.”

Harris Faulkner: “So you believe men and women are the same? You don’t believe in science?” Marie Harf: “Those two questions are different.” Harris Faulkner: “No, actually they are not.” Marie Harf: “Of course I believe in science. [The Democratic Party] is the one that believes in science when it comes to COVID and vaccines and all those things.” Jeremy Hunt: “But not biological s*x— that’s the problem that so many of us have.” “It’s about having clarity.”

RedWave Press

155,572 次观看 • 3 个月前

They said cooking and cleaning is slavery but see them desperately pointing it out as something a woman can add to a billionaire's life, something he can outsource easily. Women don't have rules for all men, they have rules for poor men and men they don't like. Until they know you're OK without them in the picture, they'll not provide any value.

They said cooking and cleaning is slavery but see them desperately pointing it out as something a woman can add to a billionaire's life, something he can outsource easily. Women don't have rules for all men, they have rules for poor men and men they don't like. Until they know you're OK without them in the picture, they'll not provide any value.

Plato's Cousin

33,271 次观看 • 6 个月前

bnd’s jaehyun’s first time in daechinso but not as an mc so he called hanbin 🥹 🧸 it’s the first time he’s been here as a guest instead of an mc 🐶 it’s my first time today and it’s also the first time i didn’t do the script reading beforehand and just came in from outside so it feels really strange. 🐶 and as soon as i got to m countdown, i thought of the old days and called hanbin. "i missed you since i’m at m countdown" that’s what i said and... well yeah, that’s what happened. 🧸 so there wasn’t much of a reaction? 🐶 oh and he said he’s watching!

bnd’s jaehyun’s first time in daechinso but not as an mc so he called hanbin 🥹 🧸 it’s the first time he’s been here as a guest instead of an mc 🐶 it’s my first time today and it’s also the first time i didn’t do the script reading beforehand and just came in from outside so it feels really strange. 🐶 and as soon as i got to m countdown, i thought of the old days and called hanbin. "i missed you since i’m at m countdown" that’s what i said and... well yeah, that’s what happened. 🧸 so there wasn’t much of a reaction? 🐶 oh and he said he’s watching!

꾸 🍎

33,854 次观看 • 2 个月前

They took this man’s property… not because they needed it… but because they wanted it. He built something worth roughly $400,000… his land, his investment, his future. The county steps in under eminent domain… claims it’s for a fire station. Public use. Public good. Sounds clean… sounds lawful. But watch what actually happened. They forced him out… cut him a check for $175,000. Not market value. Not fair value. Half. Then… just months later… They flip the same property. No fire station. No public use. Luxury development. And suddenly that same land is worth hundreds of thousands more… A $675,000 gain… off land they took from a private citizen under the authority of the government. That’s not development. That’s not planning. That’s conversion of private property using state power. And here’s where it gets serious… A judge steps in… looks at the facts… and says what should’ve been said from the beginning: You cannot take someone’s property under eminent domain for one purpose…and then turn around and use it for something completely different just to make money. So what happens next? The court doesn’t just slap the city on the wrist. The judge orders them to make it right. Not politically right… not cosmetically right… Legally right. That means undoing the damage… compensating based on actual value… because what was taken wasn’t just land……it was equity… leverage… opportunity… and control over one’s own future. This is what people miss about eminent domain. It’s one of the most powerful tools government has…and when it’s abused… it stops being public service and starts looking like state-sanctioned taking for profit. If the facts are as stated… the court saw it for exactly what it was. Not a mistake. A misuse of power. And that’s why the ruling hit as hard as it did. #AStoneGroove

They took this man’s property… not because they needed it… but because they wanted it. He built something worth roughly $400,000… his land, his investment, his future. The county steps in under eminent domain… claims it’s for a fire station. Public use. Public good. Sounds clean… sounds lawful. But watch what actually happened. They forced him out… cut him a check for $175,000. Not market value. Not fair value. Half. Then… just months later… They flip the same property. No fire station. No public use. Luxury development. And suddenly that same land is worth hundreds of thousands more… A $675,000 gain… off land they took from a private citizen under the authority of the government. That’s not development. That’s not planning. That’s conversion of private property using state power. And here’s where it gets serious… A judge steps in… looks at the facts… and says what should’ve been said from the beginning: You cannot take someone’s property under eminent domain for one purpose…and then turn around and use it for something completely different just to make money. So what happens next? The court doesn’t just slap the city on the wrist. The judge orders them to make it right. Not politically right… not cosmetically right… Legally right. That means undoing the damage… compensating based on actual value… because what was taken wasn’t just land……it was equity… leverage… opportunity… and control over one’s own future. This is what people miss about eminent domain. It’s one of the most powerful tools government has…and when it’s abused… it stops being public service and starts looking like state-sanctioned taking for profit. If the facts are as stated… the court saw it for exactly what it was. Not a mistake. A misuse of power. And that’s why the ruling hit as hard as it did. #AStoneGroove

A Gene Robinson

197,320 次观看 • 4 个月前

Pastor Erik Reed boldly putting an end to the "both sides" arguments we've seen from many Christians over the last few weeks and calling out the Democrats for being at war with "creational reality." "We are living in a world where there are two different visions for what kind of society we want to live in. And if Christ is not in the foundations of what we're doing with our vision for the future, if the Christian foundation and worldview that made our country great to begin with is not there, and everybody's just doing what's right in their own eyes, you can guarantee chaos will ensue. We are choosing between two distinct futures. They are not the same. Our two political parties in our country are not morally equivalent to each other... I am not baptizing the Republican Party. They did not come from Mount Sinai on high from God to say 'Thus saith the Lord.' But the current state of the Democratic Party, as they are...they are a party at war with creational realities every day. Creational realities. They are at war about what it means to be a man or a woman, about marriage, about sexuality, about who has the right to live in a womb. They are at war with life and prosperity. There is one side in particular with a progressive ideology that not only tried to suppress the story of the young woman in Charlotte, but who celebrated, both in the media and with college professors and many others, the death of a man whose beliefs they did not hold... And if you're more concerned with what I've just said in the last two or three minutes, about sounding partisan, than you are concerned about the reality of what's actually happening in our society right now, you have lost the plot."

Pastor Erik Reed boldly putting an end to the "both sides" arguments we've seen from many Christians over the last few weeks and calling out the Democrats for being at war with "creational reality." "We are living in a world where there are two different visions for what kind of society we want to live in. And if Christ is not in the foundations of what we're doing with our vision for the future, if the Christian foundation and worldview that made our country great to begin with is not there, and everybody's just doing what's right in their own eyes, you can guarantee chaos will ensue. We are choosing between two distinct futures. They are not the same. Our two political parties in our country are not morally equivalent to each other... I am not baptizing the Republican Party. They did not come from Mount Sinai on high from God to say 'Thus saith the Lord.' But the current state of the Democratic Party, as they are...they are a party at war with creational realities every day. Creational realities. They are at war about what it means to be a man or a woman, about marriage, about sexuality, about who has the right to live in a womb. They are at war with life and prosperity. There is one side in particular with a progressive ideology that not only tried to suppress the story of the young woman in Charlotte, but who celebrated, both in the media and with college professors and many others, the death of a man whose beliefs they did not hold... And if you're more concerned with what I've just said in the last two or three minutes, about sounding partisan, than you are concerned about the reality of what's actually happening in our society right now, you have lost the plot."

Center for Baptist Leadership

105,520 次观看 • 10 个月前