Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

As AI capabilities continue to improve, some people have questioned whether it's possible to reliably identify AI text at all. But researchers like Jenna Russell are finding more ways that human and AI texts differ. " We took about 10,000 human written short stories from published anthologies of stories,...

MTSlive's profile picture

MTS

435,054 subscribers

12,258 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🪐 WORLD CREATORS Generative AI opened the door for everyone to tell their stories without the need for a crew or a big budget. We started slowly with images and saw an enormous interest in tools like Midjourney, DALL-E, or Leonardo. Now, a bit more than a year later, we find ourselves in front of new technologies that are transforming our way of life, how we create, and how we consume content. ChatGPT is rapidly replacing Googling, and all the generative AI tools are replacing all the stock photos and videos, with tools like Runway enabling storytelling for everyone. And we won't take over Hollywood. We will surpass it in ways we can't even imagine right now. We'll be able to create worlds and stories beyond our wildest imagination. Generative AI is enabling creative people to go 1000x on what was possible before. At the core of everything we'll still need human creativity, and we have to understand that AI tools without it will be nothing. Until then, enjoy a short video I've put together to illustrate a small fraction of the worlds we will create soon. What worlds and stories are you excited to create?
2:01

🪐 WORLD CREATORS Generative AI opened the door for everyone to tell their stories without the need for a crew or a big budget. We started slowly with images and saw an enormous interest in tools like Midjourney, DALL-E, or Leonardo. Now, a bit more than a year later, we find ourselves in front of new technologies that are transforming our way of life, how we create, and how we consume content. ChatGPT is rapidly replacing Googling, and all the generative AI tools are replacing all the stock photos and videos, with tools like Runway enabling storytelling for everyone. And we won't take over Hollywood. We will surpass it in ways we can't even imagine right now. We'll be able to create worlds and stories beyond our wildest imagination. Generative AI is enabling creative people to go 1000x on what was possible before. At the core of everything we'll still need human creativity, and we have to understand that AI tools without it will be nothing. Until then, enjoy a short video I've put together to illustrate a small fraction of the worlds we will create soon. What worlds and stories are you excited to create?

Alex Patrascu

59,270 просмотров • 2 лет назад

AI Bedtimestory You can soon create personal audio/image stories like this from a single input ⚡️ It's been more than 2 years since we launched Bedtimestory. Some +100.000 hyper personal stories later, and here we are. But it's just not limited to bedtimestories... 🧵
6:05

AI Bedtimestory You can soon create personal audio/image stories like this from a single input ⚡️ It's been more than 2 years since we launched Bedtimestory. Some +100.000 hyper personal stories later, and here we are. But it's just not limited to bedtimestories... 🧵

Linus ✦ Ekenstam

14,063 просмотров • 2 лет назад

.Dan Shipper: "The AI jobpocalypse is not a thing. The mass unemployment thing that AI lab CEOs are talking about—that's not going to happen. AI models make yesterday's human competence cheap. But what's interesting is that since everyone's using the same models, it all looks the same. So it becomes commoditized. It's not valuable anymore. And what humans do is we go in there, and we're like, yeah, we have all this frozen human competence from yesterday, how do I use this to make something new and interesting, today?"
1:06

.Dan Shipper: "The AI jobpocalypse is not a thing. The mass unemployment thing that AI lab CEOs are talking about—that's not going to happen. AI models make yesterday's human competence cheap. But what's interesting is that since everyone's using the same models, it all looks the same. So it becomes commoditized. It's not valuable anymore. And what humans do is we go in there, and we're like, yeah, we have all this frozen human competence from yesterday, how do I use this to make something new and interesting, today?"

Lenny Rachitsky

276,488 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Steve Jobs was a great communicator of technology, and we could learn something from him today, in the context of AI. Sam Altman recently said, "If AI stays on the trajectory we think it will, then amazing things will be possible. Maybe with 10 gigawatts of compute, AI can figure out how to cure cancer." That's a fine quote. The abundance AI promises is super exciting. But Sam is saying that AI is going to figure out how to cure cancer. And if you've used these tools today, and talked to people who are at the labs, the reality is it's much more likely that humans will use AI to cure cancer. Steve might have said: "If AI stays on the trajectory we think it will, then amazing things will be possible. Maybe with 10 gigawatts of compute, humans can use AI to cure cancer." Small tweak, but a big difference. Steve Jobs was not one to shy away from impressive specs and massive scale, but flipping the final line from "AI will cure cancer" to "Humans will use AI to cure cancer" makes all the difference. Apple under Steve Jobs put human centrality at the heart of everything they did. And we need that spirit to infuse how we communicate about AI today.
1:48

Steve Jobs was a great communicator of technology, and we could learn something from him today, in the context of AI. Sam Altman recently said, "If AI stays on the trajectory we think it will, then amazing things will be possible. Maybe with 10 gigawatts of compute, AI can figure out how to cure cancer." That's a fine quote. The abundance AI promises is super exciting. But Sam is saying that AI is going to figure out how to cure cancer. And if you've used these tools today, and talked to people who are at the labs, the reality is it's much more likely that humans will use AI to cure cancer. Steve might have said: "If AI stays on the trajectory we think it will, then amazing things will be possible. Maybe with 10 gigawatts of compute, humans can use AI to cure cancer." Small tweak, but a big difference. Steve Jobs was not one to shy away from impressive specs and massive scale, but flipping the final line from "AI will cure cancer" to "Humans will use AI to cure cancer" makes all the difference. Apple under Steve Jobs put human centrality at the heart of everything they did. And we need that spirit to infuse how we communicate about AI today.

TBPN

21,828 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Sam Altman: "I'm not a jobs doomer at all. I think there are gonna be tons of jobs." "If we could go back to 2019 and show people our latest model, not only would they say that it's AGI, they would say that the economy would have been completely upended. And that has not happened. Anytime you're that wrong and that confident, which I think we were as a field, you have to update. AI is just very jagged. It's like superhuman genius in some ways, like dumb toddler in others. And people have, so far, extremely complementary skills to AI. It's not taste…the world may need a new kind of word for the kind of judgment that people are very good at that AIs seem to really deeply struggle with. You can go hire an AI consultant right now or talk to an AI sales rep or hire an AI engineer. And somehow most people seem to still really prefer interacting with a human. I definitely would rather engage with a person than engage with an AI for almost everything. Human values have value because they're human. We are deeply hardwired to care about people."
2:08

Sam Altman: "I'm not a jobs doomer at all. I think there are gonna be tons of jobs." "If we could go back to 2019 and show people our latest model, not only would they say that it's AGI, they would say that the economy would have been completely upended. And that has not happened. Anytime you're that wrong and that confident, which I think we were as a field, you have to update. AI is just very jagged. It's like superhuman genius in some ways, like dumb toddler in others. And people have, so far, extremely complementary skills to AI. It's not taste…the world may need a new kind of word for the kind of judgment that people are very good at that AIs seem to really deeply struggle with. You can go hire an AI consultant right now or talk to an AI sales rep or hire an AI engineer. And somehow most people seem to still really prefer interacting with a human. I definitely would rather engage with a person than engage with an AI for almost everything. Human values have value because they're human. We are deeply hardwired to care about people."

Patrick OShaughnessy

66,324 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Sam Altman: "I'm not a jobs doomer at all. I think there are gonna be tons of jobs.” If we could go back to 2019 and show people our latest model, not only would they say that it's AGI, they would say that the economy would have been completely upended. And that has not happened. Anytime you're that wrong and that confident, which I think we were as a field, you have to update. AI is just very jagged. It's like superhuman genius in some ways, like dumb toddler in others. And people have, so far, extremely complementary skills to AI. It’s not taste…the world may need a new kind of word for the kind of judgment that people are very good at that AIs seem to really deeply struggle with. You can go hire an AI consultant right now or talk to an AI sales rep or hire an AI engineer. And somehow most people seem to still really prefer interacting with a human. I definitely would rather engage with a person than engage with an AI for almost everything. Human values have value because they're human. We are deeply hardwired to care about people.”
2:08

Sam Altman: "I'm not a jobs doomer at all. I think there are gonna be tons of jobs.” If we could go back to 2019 and show people our latest model, not only would they say that it's AGI, they would say that the economy would have been completely upended. And that has not happened. Anytime you're that wrong and that confident, which I think we were as a field, you have to update. AI is just very jagged. It's like superhuman genius in some ways, like dumb toddler in others. And people have, so far, extremely complementary skills to AI. It’s not taste…the world may need a new kind of word for the kind of judgment that people are very good at that AIs seem to really deeply struggle with. You can go hire an AI consultant right now or talk to an AI sales rep or hire an AI engineer. And somehow most people seem to still really prefer interacting with a human. I definitely would rather engage with a person than engage with an AI for almost everything. Human values have value because they're human. We are deeply hardwired to care about people.”

Invest Like the Best

20,730 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

For generative AI to become an interesting art tool, we need much more control over the output. The slot-machine-like nature of pure text-to-image leaves too much to chance. Using the "Real-time Latent Consistency Model" that I'm using in the example here, is the first time I truly got a glimpse of a future where we'll be able to use our artistic skills and sensibility, to get control over AI image gen. Systems like these will never be able to match the quality or originality of a skilled artist, it won't surprise us in the same way an artist can. Things are a mess in terms of the training data these models are based on, and the questions about copyright concerns and about a time when everything will look the same are very valid. At some point capabilities like these will be embedded in photoshop, and anyone will be able to generate a pretty picture. But to create interesting designs, to tell original stories and to surprise us, we need creatives and artists with something on their mind. We'll be able to create immersive worlds, by making brush-strokes and sculpt marks, without needing to worry about all the dials, plugins, wires of our 3d and 2d tools today. I love to sculpt, I love to draw, and I love to explore new mediums and new ways to create. The Gen AI tools we have today are far from perfect, and things need to be steered in a better direction. For that we need artists to help point the way. Gen AI isn't going away.. it's too powerful and has the potential to allow us to tell stories like never before. Like all other big technological shifts, tech like this will come at a cost, but it will also open up new opportunities and empower a new generation of storytellers. I might be naive, but I believe that human ingenuity and creativity will persevere in this new world ♥️ #art #ai
0:32

For generative AI to become an interesting art tool, we need much more control over the output. The slot-machine-like nature of pure text-to-image leaves too much to chance. Using the "Real-time Latent Consistency Model" that I'm using in the example here, is the first time I truly got a glimpse of a future where we'll be able to use our artistic skills and sensibility, to get control over AI image gen. Systems like these will never be able to match the quality or originality of a skilled artist, it won't surprise us in the same way an artist can. Things are a mess in terms of the training data these models are based on, and the questions about copyright concerns and about a time when everything will look the same are very valid. At some point capabilities like these will be embedded in photoshop, and anyone will be able to generate a pretty picture. But to create interesting designs, to tell original stories and to surprise us, we need creatives and artists with something on their mind. We'll be able to create immersive worlds, by making brush-strokes and sculpt marks, without needing to worry about all the dials, plugins, wires of our 3d and 2d tools today. I love to sculpt, I love to draw, and I love to explore new mediums and new ways to create. The Gen AI tools we have today are far from perfect, and things need to be steered in a better direction. For that we need artists to help point the way. Gen AI isn't going away.. it's too powerful and has the potential to allow us to tell stories like never before. Like all other big technological shifts, tech like this will come at a cost, but it will also open up new opportunities and empower a new generation of storytellers. I might be naive, but I believe that human ingenuity and creativity will persevere in this new world ♥️ #art #ai

Martin Nebelong

1,660,694 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Stanford Prof. Christopher Manning says today’s AI can absorb 2,000 years of human knowledge and still be far worse than humans at learning from just a few examples: "No matter how fantastic these systems are, there's still a lot we can't do. A lot of it looks better than it is because these huge models have been able to slurp up 2,000-plus years of human learning across all domains and stick it all in one huge neural net." "That's amazing because it knows everything to a first approximation. But really that's exploiting hard-won human knowledge, and that's different to the large language model discovering its own knowledge the same way human beings have been for 2,000 years." "At the end of the day, the secret of human intelligence is actually the speed at which we can learn. We only need to see a couple of examples of something, and we can learn something and intuit it." "Our current AI is nothing like that. We're substituting, here are 10,000 examples of this thing, because really the machine learning is very poor compared to human learning." Stanford NLP Group Stanford University
2:55

Stanford Prof. Christopher Manning says today’s AI can absorb 2,000 years of human knowledge and still be far worse than humans at learning from just a few examples: "No matter how fantastic these systems are, there's still a lot we can't do. A lot of it looks better than it is because these huge models have been able to slurp up 2,000-plus years of human learning across all domains and stick it all in one huge neural net." "That's amazing because it knows everything to a first approximation. But really that's exploiting hard-won human knowledge, and that's different to the large language model discovering its own knowledge the same way human beings have been for 2,000 years." "At the end of the day, the secret of human intelligence is actually the speed at which we can learn. We only need to see a couple of examples of something, and we can learn something and intuit it." "Our current AI is nothing like that. We're substituting, here are 10,000 examples of this thing, because really the machine learning is very poor compared to human learning." Stanford NLP Group Stanford University

MTS

16,405 просмотров • 25 дней назад

Today we had 4 big Intercom product announcements. Huge shoutout to the many talented people here who worked on all of these 🥰 * 1 New AI-first Messenger* Messaging/Chat tools for Customer Service were never designed with AI at the centre, we added AI to what existed already. But there are better ways to do it, and so we redesigned our Messenger to make it AI-first! It's all-in on AI, and also imho quite beautiful! 🤩
0:26

Today we had 4 big Intercom product announcements. Huge shoutout to the many talented people here who worked on all of these 🥰 * 1 New AI-first Messenger* Messaging/Chat tools for Customer Service were never designed with AI at the centre, we added AI to what existed already. But there are better ways to do it, and so we redesigned our Messenger to make it AI-first! It's all-in on AI, and also imho quite beautiful! 🤩

Paul Adams

126,055 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Today we are announcing Keenable AI, an AI-native index of the best human knowledge we have, starting with the open web. AI seems to know just about everything until you ask it about something you know deeply. The answer isn’t wrong, but it's just very average. We started Keenable to fix this problem: every model and every agent should be able to query, reason over, and continuously learn from the living web. Backed by a $26M Seed from Accel and Conviction. Built by the team that took on Google at Yandex Search, with researchers and engineers from Amazon AGI, X, and Perplexity. The Web Search API and Web Query Language for AI are live now. Together they make the web queryable at AI scale. Both are free until end of September. Seven days of benchmarks, stories, and launches ahead. Let your agents search.
1:08

Today we are announcing Keenable AI, an AI-native index of the best human knowledge we have, starting with the open web. AI seems to know just about everything until you ask it about something you know deeply. The answer isn’t wrong, but it's just very average. We started Keenable to fix this problem: every model and every agent should be able to query, reason over, and continuously learn from the living web. Backed by a $26M Seed from Accel and Conviction. Built by the team that took on Google at Yandex Search, with researchers and engineers from Amazon AGI, X, and Perplexity. The Web Search API and Web Query Language for AI are live now. Together they make the web queryable at AI scale. Both are free until end of September. Seven days of benchmarks, stories, and launches ahead. Let your agents search.

Andrey Styskin

553,812 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Many people have reported their Tesla’s cameras showing people that aren’t really there American visits his dad’s grave. Nobody is there but the Tesla shows there are people, even dogs walking around This has been explained by the Tesla system being trained to detect human-like forms. It sees gravestones, statues, crosses and reflections that can look enough like people and the AI flags them as pedestrians The screen is an AI-generated overlay of the surroundings, so it interprets and animates objects. This has been used to explain these “ghosts” Other people believe the people the vehicle are picking up are real and not really gone. They’re just on a different frequency that we can’t see Whatever you believe or the explanation, it’s very interesting
1:23

Many people have reported their Tesla’s cameras showing people that aren’t really there American visits his dad’s grave. Nobody is there but the Tesla shows there are people, even dogs walking around This has been explained by the Tesla system being trained to detect human-like forms. It sees gravestones, statues, crosses and reflections that can look enough like people and the AI flags them as pedestrians The screen is an AI-generated overlay of the surroundings, so it interprets and animates objects. This has been used to explain these “ghosts” Other people believe the people the vehicle are picking up are real and not really gone. They’re just on a different frequency that we can’t see Whatever you believe or the explanation, it’s very interesting

Wall Street Apes

111,136 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Jensen Huang on "distillation" On his new interview with axios, he was asked this question "Should open source model companies be allowed to distill closed models" "Distillation—learning from AI, learning from other people, and learning from other sources of knowledge, is fundamental to intelligence. We are constantly learning from other people. I am learning from you through the questions you are asking, and you are learning from me. All day long, we are learning from one another. AI also has to learn from something. The original AI models, whether they were open or closed, were trained on previously created knowledge from the internet. Now, AI is generating more content than humans. In a few more years, the internet could be 99% AI-generated content, and that content will have been created by some form of AI. As a result, AI systems will constantly be distilling knowledge and intelligence from other AI systems. The fact that AI can learn is a good thing. We want AI systems to be intelligent because a smarter AI can also be a safer AI." ---- From "Axios" YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)
1:07

Jensen Huang on "distillation" On his new interview with axios, he was asked this question "Should open source model companies be allowed to distill closed models" "Distillation—learning from AI, learning from other people, and learning from other sources of knowledge, is fundamental to intelligence. We are constantly learning from other people. I am learning from you through the questions you are asking, and you are learning from me. All day long, we are learning from one another. AI also has to learn from something. The original AI models, whether they were open or closed, were trained on previously created knowledge from the internet. Now, AI is generating more content than humans. In a few more years, the internet could be 99% AI-generated content, and that content will have been created by some form of AI. As a result, AI systems will constantly be distilling knowledge and intelligence from other AI systems. The fact that AI can learn is a good thing. We want AI systems to be intelligent because a smarter AI can also be a safer AI." ---- From "Axios" YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)

Rohan Paul

444,163 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Why do I have the largest collection of curated TV commercials surfaced by independent VHS recordings to train AI? Trillions of dollars went in to them. Millions of minds. All to hone a message in 30 seconds. Today and forever AI will do this in seconds. There is a wealth of wisdom to learn from all of them as a genre. The profound compression of human emotions. Regardless of something being sold, like below, coffee, we can train AI to understand humanity in ways no other medium could. I hear the grumbling from some that may say this is “human slip” perhaps but it is far better than the self hating nihilism of Reddit and the Internet. My AI models already know human goals with our being told. And I am just getting started. So, you hear about “alignment” problems from brilliant AI minds, with them down for a coffee and school them, you now know more than most of them.
0:59

Why do I have the largest collection of curated TV commercials surfaced by independent VHS recordings to train AI? Trillions of dollars went in to them. Millions of minds. All to hone a message in 30 seconds. Today and forever AI will do this in seconds. There is a wealth of wisdom to learn from all of them as a genre. The profound compression of human emotions. Regardless of something being sold, like below, coffee, we can train AI to understand humanity in ways no other medium could. I hear the grumbling from some that may say this is “human slip” perhaps but it is far better than the self hating nihilism of Reddit and the Internet. My AI models already know human goals with our being told. And I am just getting started. So, you hear about “alignment” problems from brilliant AI minds, with them down for a coffee and school them, you now know more than most of them.

Brian Roemmele

60,306 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Nvidia $NVDA CEO Jensen Huang was asked about a recent story that said he warned that China will beat the US in the AI race “That’s not what I said. What I said was China has very good AI technology. They have many AI researchers, in fact 50% of the world’s AI researchers are in China. And they develop very good AI technology. In fact, the most popular AI models in the world today, open-source models, are from China. So, they are moving very, very fast. The United States has to continue to move incredibly fast. And otherwise, otherwise – the world is very competitive, so we have to run fast.” (H/T Dan Nystedt)
0:42

Nvidia $NVDA CEO Jensen Huang was asked about a recent story that said he warned that China will beat the US in the AI race “That’s not what I said. What I said was China has very good AI technology. They have many AI researchers, in fact 50% of the world’s AI researchers are in China. And they develop very good AI technology. In fact, the most popular AI models in the world today, open-source models, are from China. So, they are moving very, very fast. The United States has to continue to move incredibly fast. And otherwise, otherwise – the world is very competitive, so we have to run fast.” (H/T Dan Nystedt)

Evan

1,947,010 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Palo Alto Networks CEO Nikesh Arora says roughly 50% of the company’s new hires over the last six months have been early-career. Three talent profiles PAN is prioritizing in the AI era: 1 – People who can actually use coding agents “One set of people we want are people who are AI-savvy, who know how to use AI to get their jobs done better, who know how to use coding agents.” “These are people who are learning, and they’re typically having to run through hackathons to get to Palo Alto. We don’t look at where you went to school. We care about whether you can use coding agents, whether you can use AI.” “If we keep following that trend, it’s reasonably likely that we will overwhelm the non-AI-savvy people with more AI-savvy people. That’s kind of ground zero. You’ve got to get that done.” 2 - Cybersecurity experts who know AI “The second part is there are people who are really good at cybersecurity and know AI and they’d like to get involved.” “If you want to work in cybersecurity, there’s no better place to work than Palo Alto Networks. We’re the largest cybersecurity company in the world. You want to have an impact? You want lots of proprietary training data? We’ve got it.” 3 – Pure AI researchers “The third part is raw, pure AI researchers who can do wonders with small language models and large language models.” “There we have people who are AI literate. We have some PhDs in AI who work here who have a cybersecurity bent, but they can go back to their roots in AI.”
2:06

Palo Alto Networks CEO Nikesh Arora says roughly 50% of the company’s new hires over the last six months have been early-career. Three talent profiles PAN is prioritizing in the AI era: 1 – People who can actually use coding agents “One set of people we want are people who are AI-savvy, who know how to use AI to get their jobs done better, who know how to use coding agents.” “These are people who are learning, and they’re typically having to run through hackathons to get to Palo Alto. We don’t look at where you went to school. We care about whether you can use coding agents, whether you can use AI.” “If we keep following that trend, it’s reasonably likely that we will overwhelm the non-AI-savvy people with more AI-savvy people. That’s kind of ground zero. You’ve got to get that done.” 2 - Cybersecurity experts who know AI “The second part is there are people who are really good at cybersecurity and know AI and they’d like to get involved.” “If you want to work in cybersecurity, there’s no better place to work than Palo Alto Networks. We’re the largest cybersecurity company in the world. You want to have an impact? You want lots of proprietary training data? We’ve got it.” 3 – Pure AI researchers “The third part is raw, pure AI researchers who can do wonders with small language models and large language models.” “There we have people who are AI literate. We have some PhDs in AI who work here who have a cybersecurity bent, but they can go back to their roots in AI.”

TBPN

45,321 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Elon Musk: There are really two choices here: either be a spectator or a participant "I've been a voice saying that we need to slow down AI and we need to slow down all these things and we need to not have a crazy AI race. I've been saying that for a long time for 20+ years But then I came to realize that there are really two choices here: either be a spectator or a participant. And if I'm a spectator, I can't really influence the direction of AI But if I'm a participant, I can try to influence the direction of AI and have a maximally truth-seeking AI with good values that loves humanity And that's what we're trying to create with Grok at xAI. And the researchers, I think, are bearing this out. Grok was the only one of the AIs that weighted human life equally and didn't say For example, that a white guy's life is worth 1/20th of a black woman's life. Literally, that's what the calculation they came up with. So, I’m like, guys, this is very alarming; we’ve got to fix this stuff"
0:54

Elon Musk: There are really two choices here: either be a spectator or a participant "I've been a voice saying that we need to slow down AI and we need to slow down all these things and we need to not have a crazy AI race. I've been saying that for a long time for 20+ years But then I came to realize that there are really two choices here: either be a spectator or a participant. And if I'm a spectator, I can't really influence the direction of AI But if I'm a participant, I can try to influence the direction of AI and have a maximally truth-seeking AI with good values that loves humanity And that's what we're trying to create with Grok at xAI. And the researchers, I think, are bearing this out. Grok was the only one of the AIs that weighted human life equally and didn't say For example, that a white guy's life is worth 1/20th of a black woman's life. Literally, that's what the calculation they came up with. So, I’m like, guys, this is very alarming; we’ve got to fix this stuff"

X Freeze

15,201 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

A sneak peek of Princess Jane's home world. I know AI is nowhere near to creating perfect movies yet, but this feels like the beginning of something great. Experimenting with AI-generated scripts like this feels like an important first step on the journey towards more human-AI creativity in filmmaking. For those wondering if I use AI to write my scripts, yes and no, I craft the base ideas, then use Anthropic AI to refine and polish it. I have successfully trained Anthropic on my story; it automatically knows and predicts each plot in the story. I do not wish to destroy human creativity but enhance it through AI; I believe a human and AI partnership will transcend anything we have ever seen.
0:26

A sneak peek of Princess Jane's home world. I know AI is nowhere near to creating perfect movies yet, but this feels like the beginning of something great. Experimenting with AI-generated scripts like this feels like an important first step on the journey towards more human-AI creativity in filmmaking. For those wondering if I use AI to write my scripts, yes and no, I craft the base ideas, then use Anthropic AI to refine and polish it. I have successfully trained Anthropic on my story; it automatically knows and predicts each plot in the story. I do not wish to destroy human creativity but enhance it through AI; I believe a human and AI partnership will transcend anything we have ever seen.

Rufus

1,968,969 просмотров • 3 лет назад