Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

As expected, #Haryana has a different take on language wars. Either speak properly, or stick to your own 😀👍 Moreover, Gurgaon and even other parts of haryana, millions of people from across the country come and work, settle down, build their lives. Never seen a single instance of such...

31,727 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

9 Comments

PRP's profile picture
PRP1 year ago

Being from Odisha, when I moved to Gurgaon for the first time back in 2008, the dialect was a shock to me just like everyone. People think haryanvi is rude, it’s not. People are very accepting and the dialect has inherent humour in it. If people spend some time, understand it and they will fall in love with it, just like I did 😀 But on a serious note, the language wars are nothing but planned.

Maj Manik M Jolly,SM's profile picture
Maj Manik M Jolly,SM1 year ago

😂👍

स्वाति शर्मा 🇮🇳's profile picture
स्वाति शर्मा 🇮🇳1 year ago

हम्बै! न्यूई होवे म्हारे पश्चिम यूपी मै भी 🤣

Sumit Chaudhary's profile picture
Sumit Chaudhary1 year ago

He already explained the mind set and trust me during partition when people from Pakistan came for how many days people of Haryana feed them , till you mind your own business you are welcome in Haryana if you don't then it's not a place for you

Rey's profile picture
Rey1 year ago

True for most parts of north India, I reckon. They’re less parochial and a lot more welcoming of outsiders.

Philosophon's profile picture
Philosophon1 year ago

Haryana always welcome people with love and respect. Sahi kaha bhai ne... Haryana m aao..ar bhai chaara seekho.

Krishna Hampe's profile picture
Krishna Hampe1 year ago

What's mine is mine, what's yours is negotiable is how you folks argue

Anu Bakshi🇮🇳🇮🇳's profile picture
Anu Bakshi🇮🇳🇮🇳1 year ago

Agree

@aashish🇮🇳 (Modi's family)'s profile picture
@aashish🇮🇳 (Modi's family)1 year ago

Or gujju... Kuchh bhi chalta hai humko.....

Related Videos

India is a land of many languages — but true unity stems from mutual respect, not forced conformity. Tejasvi Surya (तेजस्वी सूर्या) is a native Kannada speaker from Karnataka, just as Marathi is widely spoken across Maharashtra. While regional languages are an essential part of India's cultural identity, the employees of the Government of India primarily communicate in Hindi and English — the two official languages recognized and used across all central institutions. Expecting every central government or bank employee to fluently speak the regional language of the state they’re posted in is not just unrealistic, but also unfair. Take banking, for instance — it’s a centrally administered service. Bank employees may be posted anywhere in the country, often in states where their native language is not spoken. India’s linguistic landscape is incredibly rich — dialects and accents change every few kilometers. In such a diverse setting, Hindi, understood by a majority, and English, used officially, act as common communication bridges. These employees are here to serve and assist. If there's a problem with their service, it should be addressed constructively. But criticizing or harassing them for not speaking a local language is unjust. Should a Kannada speaker be expected to speak Punjabi in Punjab, Pahari in Himachal, or Haryanvi in Haryana? Certainly not. The recent incident involving a bank employee being targeted over a language issue is deeply unfortunate. It reflects a disturbing trend — one that threatens to sow division in the name of identity. Language is a means to connect, not to divide or degrade. India’s strength lies in its diversity. And that strength is preserved not by making everyone the same, but by recognizing, accepting, and respecting our differences. Let us not forget — dignity, respect, and service must rise above language barriers. That's the essence of a united and inclusive India.

𝐌𝐫.𝐑𝐚𝐣 𝐌𝐨𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐭

64,028 views • 1 year ago

Here is the real voice of Einstein. In 1941, the great physicist was recorded reading an essay he wrote called "The Common Language of Science." In this fascinating excerpt, he warns of the dangers of "errors and deception" that come from letting your language (and ideas) drift away from the reality perceived by your senses. Good message for all times — especially ours. The Common Language of Science The first step towards language was to link acoustically or otherwise commutable signs to sense-impressions. Most likely all sociable animals have arrived at this primitive kind of communication--at least to a certain degree. A higher development is reached when further signs are introduced and understood which establish relations between those other signs designating sense impression. At this stage it is already possible to report somewhat complex series of impressions; we can say that language has come to existence. If language is to lead at all to understanding, there must be rules concerning the relations between the signs on the one hand and on the other hand there must be a stable correspondence between signs and impressions. In their childhood individuals connected by the same language grasp these rules and relations mainly by intuition. When man becomes conscious of the rules concerning the relations between signs the so-called grammar of language is established. In an early stage the words may correspond directly to impressions. At a later stage this direct connection is lost insofar as some words convey relations to perceptions only if used in connection with other words (for instance such words as: "is", "or", "thing"). Then word-groups rather than single words refer to perceptions. When language becomes thus partially independent from the background of impressions a greater inner coherence is gained. Only at this further development where frequent use is made of so-called abstract concepts, language becomes an instrument of reasoning in the true sense of the word. But it is also this development which turns language into a dangerous source of error and deception. Everything depends on the degree to which words and word combinations correspond to the world of impression. What is it that brings about such an intimate connection between language and thinking? Is there no thinking without the use of language, namely in concepts and concept-combinations for which words need not necessarily come to mind? Has not every one of us struggled for words although the connection between "things" was already clear? We might be inclined to attribute to the act of thinking complete independence from language if the individual formed or were able to form his concepts without the verbal guidance of his environment. Yet most likely the mental shape of an individual growing up under such conditions, would be very poor. Thus we may conclude that the mental development of the individual and his way of forming concepts depend to a high degree upon language. This makes us realize to what extent the same language means the same mentality. In this sense thinking and language are linked together.

Benjamin Carlson

14,905 views • 2 years ago

#Manipur It is sad that even with all the horrible burnings and killings and kidnappings of small kids and women going on - the situation isn't serious enough for the Hon'ble PM and GOI to speak or act. 500 days and more of Manipur burning - armed militants roaming around freely attacking civilians and farmers, CM of neighbouring State openly supporting uniting of all Kuki Zo across 3 Countries while Manipur burns because of the same demand, still the situation isn't serious enough for the Hon'ble PM and GOI to speak or act. What is the boundary to be crossed for the situation to be serious enough? How many more people to be burnt and kidnapped? How many women and children to be tortured? How many more months for the poor displaced 60k people to languish in heart breaking situations in camps inside their own homeland?? What more are we all waiting to happen? What is this act east policy which doesn't allow our own Govt to act and protect its own citizens and their homes in India's own far eastern most State? What is the role of drug lords and international hands in this to keep the State boiling and segregate population along ethnic lines to cause borders and strategic areas to be controlled by the Christian tribals? Is our own GOI a part of this or just plain helpless? Or is it the intelligence that the GOI gets not the real picture as it passes from the ground to the Head through layers of bureaucrats who are more affiliated to their own communal agenda rather than their constitutional duties? Or is it just plain looking down upon the natives as unworthy of attention - let them settle the way they want kind of attitude? Is it only the land and its strategic location that India takes interest in and not its indigenous people? These are questions that deserve answers from those who wield power and are able to take decisions. Manipur doesn't deserve such treatment. Allow this situation to continue some more time and more and more people will start being convinced that India doesn't deserve to have Manipur as one of its States. Abhijit Chavda PMO India Narendra Modi Amit Shah गृहमंत्री कार्यालय, HMO India N. Biren Singh A. Bimol Akoijam News9 News18 EastMojo

GRT

10,700 views • 1 year ago

This is Kenyan President William Ruto boasting that Kenyans speak better English than Nigerians 🤣🤣🤣 He is confusing accent with diction. When African presidents boast that their citizens speak “better English” than others, they are not demonstrating a strong education system, as Ruto claims, they are showcasing a deep inferiority complex rooted in colonial conditioning. English is a colonial language, not a measure of intelligence, capability, or national progress. You can be fully fluent in a language and still have an accent that is difficult for some listeners to understand, as Nigerians do. Fluency means you have a strong command of vocabulary, grammar, and the ability to express ideas. Accent, on the other hand, relates to pronunciation, rhythm, and intonation, which are shaped by your first language and speech environment, which is what Ruto is confusing with good English. Has he ever had someone from Scotland, Liverpool, or Birmingham speak? Accents are a natural linguistic outcome, not a measure of education. They emerge from the influence of a person’s first language, the sounds and speech patterns they grow up with, and the environment in which they learn and use another language. Every language has its own phonetic structure, and when people speak a second language like English, those underlying patterns shape pronunciation, rhythm, and tone. That is why accents vary across regions and countries. They reflect history, identity, and exposure, not intellectual or educational superiority. I know that there is some kind of tension between Nigeria and Kenya, but such misleading statements undermine the confidence of young people. When they hear a president speak like that about how they speak, it erodes their self-belief, and that is not a good thing to come from a president.

Hopewell Chin’ono

141,353 views • 2 months ago