Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

As I explained on Hannity: These are not pro Palestinian protests. Nothing about what they are doing is benefiting any type of Middle Eastern people. These are pro Hamas riots. These are Islamist mobs. And what they are trying to do, their strategy, is to intimidate the American people,...

47,265 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

10 Yorum

LukeBSmith profil fotoğrafı
LukeBSmith2 yıl önce

They make all of us further disdain them. Protesting at the World Trade Center was despicable. Military families are disgusted with them as are all law abiding Americans.

ETTA50+2GO 🐶 🐾🐩🐈🐾 profil fotoğrafı
ETTA50+2GO 🐶 🐾🐩🐈🐾2 yıl önce

If any of these people are found to be illegal - they should be arrested and deported IMMEDIATELY! No warnings! Get them OUT OF HERE!!! I pray there is ONE DAY we (troops/Natl Guard) round them up and do this! No exceptions! WE DO NOT NEED THESE PEOPLE IN THE U.S.A!!!!

Alex profil fotoğrafı
Alex2 yıl önce

Totally agree. Their goal is to impose their culture (laws, traditions, moral codes of conduct,etc.).They go against the cultural foundations of our societies.

J. L. Amadé Hill Edwards profil fotoğrafı
J. L. Amadé Hill Edwards2 yıl önce

Delete “civil rights” lawyer from your bio 🤡

Sharon #WeAreCollective 🤍 profil fotoğrafı
Sharon #WeAreCollective 🤍2 yıl önce

You're a propagandist. An enabler of genocide.

Jonathan Levitt profil fotoğrafı
Jonathan Levitt2 yıl önce

Thanks for doing this work 👏🏻👏🏻

Ofra Haza Stan Account profil fotoğrafı
Ofra Haza Stan Account2 yıl önce

Spot on, thank you for your advocacy. This movement is a Pro-terror movement, it’s a Neo-Nazi movement, it should not be enabled by American law enforcement

Nhoj Daag profil fotoğrafı
Nhoj Daag2 yıl önce

Israel is committing crimes

The Persian Jewess profil fotoğrafı
The Persian Jewess2 yıl önce

#NeverAgainIsNow

Blake Selzer profil fotoğrafı
Blake Selzer2 yıl önce

Agree, terminology is important. To label anyone protesting for Palestinian rights or calling for a ceasefire to stop killing civilians in Gaza as Pro-Hamas is both disingenuous & lazy. And “Islamist mobs,” setting aside the racism in that comment, the protests are quite diverse.

Benzer Videolar

ABC’s George Stephanopoulos attempted to trip up Secretary of State Marco Rubio by asking the same question about Venezuela three different times. “What is the legal authority for the United States to be running Venezuela?” And three times, Rubio shut him down. RUBIO: “I explained to you what our goals are and how we’re going to use the leverage to make it happen.” “As far as our legal authority on the quarantine, simple. We have court orders. These are sanctioned boats, and we get orders from courts to go after and seize these sanctions. Is a court not a legal authority?” STEPHANOPOULOS: “Is the United States running Venezuela right now?” RUBIO: “Well, I’ve explained once again, I’ll do it one more time.” “What we are running is the direction this is going to move moving forward, and that is we have leverage.” “This leverage we are using and we intend to use. We started using already. You can see where they are running out of storage capacity. In a few weeks, they’re going to have to start pumping oil, unless they make changes.” “That leverage that we have with the armada of boats that are currently positioned, allow us to seize any sanctioned boats coming into or out of Venezuela loaded with oil or on its way in to pick up oil.” “We can pick and choose which ones we go after. We have court orders for each one.” “That will continue to be in place until the people who have control over the levers of power in that country make changes that are not just in the interest of the people of Venezuela but are in the interest of the United States and the things that we care about.” “The legal authority is the court orders that we have.”

Overton

213,086 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

🗣️"My second comment is that the women lured and entrapped by Jewish slave dealers are made doubly easy prey because they never have been warned to beware of Jews. And the reason they never have been warned is that the Jewish communists of every regime in Eastern Europe enacted legislation making it illegal to do so. ➡️To warn a young woman never to trust a Jew, to tell a young woman what Jews are like and what they do is hate speech. And hate speech is a penal offense in every country of Eastern Europe. ➡️Jews may not be criticized. It is illegal to tell the truth about them. In Israel, it is legal to buy and sell slaves so long as they aren't Jews. The slave trade is big business in Israel and it's legal. And these Russian and Latvian and Hungarian girls lured to Israel and forced into a life of slavery and degradation are our people. ➡️Among the moral 2% of the U.S. population, there are people who care as much as I do about the fact that their government sends billions of dollars a year to prop up a regime which permits beautiful young white girls to be stripped, raped, beaten, put up on an auction block and sold to whichever leering, swarthy, hook-nosed KIKE makes the highest bid. ➡️We fight wars to protect that regime from its Arab neighbors. We permit the kinsmen of those who make up that regime to control our mass media of news and entertainment. We condemn the Germans for trying to free themselves from such control. There are Americans who care about these things as much as I do. And by God, we intend to do something about these things even if we have to do it Timothy McVeigh's way. I hope it doesn't come to that. But we will break the grip of these Jews and their collaborators on our society. " White women trafficking - By Dr. William Pierce

Αναγεννώμενος Φοίνιξ (Reborn Phoenix)

14,416 görüntüleme • 26 gün önce

WATCH: CNN’s John Miller mentions the video and notes left behind by the alleged Minneapolis Catholic church shooter, citing their mental illness and the working motive is “he was in pain,” but NOTHING about the shooter being transgender and that they hated Christians, Jews, and Trump... Well, we’ve been looking into the shooter who law enforcement sources have identified as Robin Westman and police have been examining some of the postings online by an individual of the same name, presumed to be the same individual. It shows numerous weapons, magazines, things in preparation for the shooting along with a book and different notes. But one of them is particularly telling in that it says: ‘I have waited for this for so long. I am not well. I am not right. I am a sad person, haunted by these thoughts that do not go away. I know this is wrong’ and he goes on to describe that the action he is going to take against this world before taking his own life — which is not uncommon in these incidents, these active shooter scenarios where you see someone who reports to be in — in — in pain and trauma and that they write all of this out and leave it behind with the foreknowledge that what they're about to do is going to end their own life as well, while taking these — these strangers, these innocent people with them in the process. But investigators are going back through this material and a lot of other material trying to determine motive. So what do we know? I mean, what we know, if this in fact is from the shooter, that his motive was he was in pain. But what we don't see here and there's more to go through is what was, what was the shooter — Robin Westman in pain about specifically?”

Curtis Houck

64,113 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

For a long time most Jewish organizations and Jewish leaders in the world treated these false claims against Israel and the Jewish people as absurd, and on their face, ridiculous. And so we ignored the claims, and we let them sort of lie and fester for a long time. And one of the big criticisms that I've heard about my book, Israel on Trial, especially from Jewish organizations, is, "Well, we shouldn't give these these allegations the time of day. We should ignore them. We shouldn't put Israel on trial, we should put Hamas on trial." All of that, I think, is fair. Hamas should be on trial. But the opposite is not necessarily true either. And I think the strategy we have taken over the last 20 or 30 years—of ignoring these claims—has proven to be a fatal mistake. And the reason for that is whether in the law or in sports or in politics, when you ignore the other side's argument, you lose. That's just how it is. No matter how flagrantly absurd the argument is. In the law, if the other side files a motion, it's an adversarial system, if you don't respond to it, the judge isn't going to delve deeply into the correctness of the motion. They've got 300 other motions to deal with. If there's an unobjected to motion, that motion is granted by what we call default. The same thing happens in sports. If one football team arrives on the field and the other team doesn't show up, they win by forfeit. And so in either case, not rebutting the arguments that you believe are frivolous has allowed these arguments really to spread like wildfire across our population, both in our young people and even now bleeding into people in their 30s, 40s, and 50s. It's a very dangerous game we've been playing, and we were wrong to play it. The point of my book is to be patient with these arguments, show people that we can engage these arguments, and that on the merits they are totally false and frivolous as a matter of fact and law.

Roy K. Altman

14,998 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce