Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

As I predicted 4 days ago Iran is playing chess. It would soak up all interceptors and then roll out its newer missiles. Well it did that yesterday in wave 22. Wave 22 began with a barrage of Khorramshahr 4, Kheibar, and Fattah missiles. Not a single country could...

1,424,729 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🇮🇷 Iran said it launched three separate waves of attacks today and that its list of potential targets against the U.S. and Israel in the region is “10 times larger” than the targets available to its enemies. Statements from the Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters and the IRGC, carried by Mehr News Agency, detail what Iran says it targeted and struck: 💢 In the 34th wave of “Operation True Promise 4,” Iran said it fired Qadr, Emad, Kheibar, and Fattah missiles at Israeli and U.S. targets. ➤ The gathering locations of American soldiers at Al Dhafra Air Base in the UAE and Al Jufair in Bahrain were “effectively targeted” by IRGC missile launches and attack drones. ➤ Iranian missiles “struck” Ramat David Airbase, the civilian airport in Haifa, and missile launchers near Bnei Brak east of Tel Aviv, according to the statement. 💢 Tehran said a 35th wave followed, launching Fattah, Kheibar Shekan, and Khorramshahr missiles toward Tel Aviv, Beit Shemesh, and U.S. bases. 💢 In Wave 36, the IRGC said attacks were carried out against the U.S. Fifth Fleet base in Bahrain, Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, and bases at Al-Adairi and Al-Harir in Iraq’s Kurdistan region, claiming American operational infrastructure was destroyed. 💢 The IRGC also said its air defenses intercepted and destroyed a Hermes-900 drone over Ilam province. 📹 Video released by Iranian media shows Qadr, Emad, and Kheibar Shekan missiles being launched during the 36th wave of “Operation True Promise 4.” Iran once again warned that U.S. and Israeli attacks on Iranian infrastructure and civilians “will not go unanswered.””Now, their days and nights are limited to siren sounds, fleeing, and shelters. We will not let them go,” the forces said.

Drop Site

67,203 views • 5 months ago

🇮🇷⚔️🇺🇸Iran or US: Who will win missile war or attrition? Russian military expert, historian of the Air Defense Forces Yuri Knutov explains: 💬 "If we look at the numbers being cited, Iran is said to have between 2,000 and 4,000 missiles. At a launch rate of around 100 or more per day, that would suggest roughly a month of sustained high-intensity missile attacks. As for THAAD interceptors, about 650 have been produced in total, with 150 used during a previous attack. That would leave roughly 400 remaining, possibly fewer. With careful and efficient use, that stock could last around 10 days — perhaps as little as five. If we’re talking about Patriot missiles, the US stockpile is larger, of course, but it can be depleted as well. Especially if they launch 10 missiles against a single Iranian ballistic missile, then they would have enough for three weeks, and that's with a very, very large margin. 👉 So Iran has a very important trump card right now. And if it uses its missiles correctly, saving its most technologically advanced ones, the hypersonic Fattahs, for the final stage—and the Fattahs are not intercepted at all by Israeli Arrow-3 missiles, nor by American THAAD and Patriot systems—then Iran essentially has a chance to land a very painful blow on Israel and the US. And in that way, essentially, to take revenge for the surprise attack carried out on Iran. [The US] produces around 55 interceptors per month, which is not enough to rapidly replenish heavy battlefield usage. New production facilities are under construction in Germany and Romania, but they are not yet operational. While some missiles could potentially be sourced from Arab states, yet Arab countries are using these missiles too. That’s why I say that given this intensity, this missile use can endure from two to three weeks, four weeks tops. But we don’t know the situation in Iran. It’s possible Iran has underground plants where ballistic missiles are produced as well."

Sputnik

195,817 views • 6 months ago

🚨Former Israeli Acting President Avraham Burg: Iran was NOT an existential threat for Israel, Netanyahu launched a WASTED war! ‘Hezbollah at the northern part of Israel is a problem, as an uncontrolled substate militia, it’s a problem for the Lebanese government, for the Israelis and maybe even for the Syrians. I mean, the entire triangle of the northern part of Israel should be troubled by the very existence and the kind of independence of Hezbollah. And something is to be done about it. Iran was not, if you ask me, an existential threat to Israel. It was a real problem. It was a real threat with the proxies and the fire and the fire belt around Israel and the provocations all over the Gulf and all over the Middle East. But it was not such an existential threat and could have been dealt differently by diplomacy, by agreements, by different equilibrium and balances. And last but not least, Hamas proved that October 7th 2023, that it is really very, very, very malicious and very criminal when it comes to their motivation to annihilate the state of Israel and to kill as many Israelis as possible. All these three are problems that Netanyahu believed, and unfortunately too many Israelis still believe that can be solved by muscles, by power, by military manoeuvres, without understanding the very ancient wisdom of war. A war that does not have a next step, which is political, which is agreement, which is a settlement, which is a kind of a new setting, is a wasted war. And all the victims, be them Israelis or be them Lebanese or innocent Gazan people or innocent Iranian people, are simply human sacrifice. It’s a waste. It’s a shame.’ -Avraham Burg joins us for Monday’s episode of Going Underground to discuss the US-Israeli war on Iran, and much more. Don’t miss it, follow us on X and follow our Rumble channel, link below in the replies 👇

Going Underground

24,097 views • 4 months ago

🇮🇷🇮🇱| NEW Documentary on the 12-day war interviewing a high-ranking Iranian Air Defense General. The general says that despite facing against a massive, technologically superior coalition (Israel & 33 countries), Iran’s air defense network remained fully operational despites suffering losses. He says that Iran successfully shot down nearly 196 enemy aircrafts (such as Hermes 900, and Heron 450, etc) and protected the country's airspace, though he admits to sustaining damage to defense systems and the loss of 35 military personnel. The General says Iran was under a massive hybrid warfare attack involving a massive volume of cruise missiles, ballistic missiles, stand-off weapons, and fighters. The general denied rumors that the Iranian air defense system was hacked or shut down. He insists the network did not stop working for "even a single moment." The general says that Iranian defense systems were struck, specifically by "stand-off" weapons (missiles fired from a distance). He also acknowledged the technological disadvantage in fighter jets where Iran operates 2nd generation aircraft while fighting against 5th generation aircrafts by the enemies, however praised the effectiveness of indigenous surface-to-air missiles (like Bavar-373 and 15 Khordad). He talks about Colonel Narimani in Tabriz who evacuated his staff but stayed behind alone to man the console, surviving a strike by 4 missiles (now a disabled veteran). The general also promised that Iran is working on technology to intercept advanced fighter jets (not just drones/missiles) and warns that any future threats will be met with a "crushing response."

Arya - آریا

116,957 views • 9 months ago

Why has Iran’s response been so lacklustre, managing to fire fewer than 100 missiles, of which only seven made it through the air defence net? The Israeli Air Force currently dominates Iran’s airspace—not just with stealth jets, but also with noisy drones, videos of which are now emerging as they circle over Tabriz, deep inside Iran. And there’s nothing Iran can do about it. Israel also clearly has excellent intelligence on missile storage sites. However, Iran is vast, and Israel can’t be everywhere at once. Some of Iran’s systems are mobile and can be launched quickly—so inevitably, some will get through. But as we’ve seen with Hezbollah, every launch burns a site and reveals more intelligence. So as Iran "uses it," it also "loses it." Recall that Iran’s primary means of deterring an Israeli attack was never its stockpile of a few thousand ballistic missiles. It was its proxies—Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, and other groups in Syria and Iraq. These were meant to attack Israel en masse in the event of an Israeli strike, creating a deterrent and allowing the IRGC to continue developing its doomsday weapons. But those proxies are now severely depleted. They’ve been rendered largely harmless. All Iran has left is its missile arsenal. However, as demonstrated in Iran’s two 2024 attacks, these missiles are highly inaccurate, with a circular error probable (CEP) of around 900 meters. That means half will land within 900 meters of their target—and half outside. Hitting any particular static target reliably requires launching hundreds of missiles. This makes them practically useless against military targets—which is why Iran has instead aimed them at cities, where even a miss can cause destruction. The missiles are also vulnerable to interception by multiple layers of Israeli and U.S. air defenses. That’s why they must be fired in large volleys rather than piecemeal. If launched one by one, over 90% will be intercepted. Combined with their inaccuracy, this makes them embarrassingly ineffective, as the Houthis have recently demonstrated. Launching large volleys, however, requires intact command-and-control systems—which have been struck—and the ability to move launch systems freely without hostile jets overhead. Last time, it took Iran three days to prepare a full-scale salvo. That kind of preparation is nearly impossible under an enemy’s air umbrella and with real-time intelligence coverage. They managed to assemble a volley of under 100 missiles—a quarter of what they launched in previous strikes—and it clearly wasn’t enough to break through air defenses. Only seven got through, destroying a few structures and injuring 12 people. Do the math: even if Iran has enough munitions for 20 more such volleys (as some experts suggest), the total damage it can inflict is not large. Still, Iran may have tricks left up its sleeve—such as submarine-launched missiles seen in recent footage—and could resort to terror attacks against soft Israeli or Jewish targets in the West. To Jews in the West, I’d say this: be careful. Iran is now a very dangerous, cornered bear. It has operatives in your countries, and it may not hesitate to use them. Stay vigilant.

Saul Sadka

398,976 views • 1 year ago

Prof. John Mearsheimer: ‘Iran war MUST END. The US🇺🇸 has used up 80% of our THAAD missiles and 65% of our Patriots.’ ‘Well, the first point I would make to you is that before the war started, General Caine was warning Trump that we had limited stocks of munitions, for purposes of waging a war against Iran. And we certainly could not fight a protracted war. But what's happened is we're engaged in a protracted war and it's amazing the extent to which we have depleted our stockpile of sophisticated weaponry. And these weapons are not going to be easy to replace. If you just look at Air Defence Missiles, there are two kinds. One are the THAADS and then the other are the Patriots. We have used up 80% of our THAAD missiles and 65% of our Patriots with regard to, you know, our attack missiles, our smart missiles that you can use for offensive purposes. We've used up 50% of the tomahawks and according to press reports, virtually all of the ATACMs and PrSMs. So the United States has really seriously damaged its inventory of sophisticated weapons that it really needs in places like East Asia, in places like Ukraine and so forth and so on. And I think that someone, who knows who it is, has leaked this information in large part to send out a clear message that the Iran war has to end. And certainly we cannot escalate in that war without even doing more damage to our weapons inventory.’ —Prof. John Mearsheimer on the latest episode of Going Underground Watch the full interview in the quoted post below 👇

Going Underground

88,136 views • 20 days ago